Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Are All Men Pedophiles?

Source 📝

251: 230: 261: 202: 353: 335: 363: 452: 427: 498: 77: 132: 108: 142: 626:
complaints from BuzzFeed that the film doesn't argue against such regulations when BuzzFeed obviously thinks it should, where those complaints in favor of liberal AoC reforms on behalf of BuzzFeed are lumped in, by putting them all in the same "criticism" section, with those where people voiced their views on harmfulness of violation of existing regulations. --
625:
Other than those many issues of self-contradiction between different sections of the article, what remains of the article is the moral issue of whether a 14-year-old professional model should pose for a film poster where the film is dedicated to debates related to AoC regulations, and, surprisingly,
616:
section pretty much says that the film tries to debunk the myth that all males would be potentially paedophile, where one of its strategies is to explain the difference between paedophilia and ephebophilia or hebephilia. The "critical reception" then cites numerous instances where people tried to
572:
While this section is well sourced, at the moment it's out of balance. There is one positive note, the award received by the film, "buried" at the end. This should either be moved to the top of the section or given a section of its own (Awards or Accolades as usually found on similar pages for
621:
section, including by attaching different meanings to words than does the film only for the sake of strawmen arguments against the film, or used that tactic to accuse it of either "trying to normalize paedophilia" or "supporting the very prejudices that it tries to debunk".
552:
culture, as well, claiming that the filmmaker has completely misunderstood the movement as some kind of fetishist ageplay, instead of the elaborate fashion moment it is. (The girl on the cover doesn't look at all like a lolita in that sense, for instance.)
46: 36: 645:
Does the fact that the movie won ONE award really warrant this being mentioned in the opening line of the article? Especially when said award is otherwise practically invisible on Knowledge (XXG).
56: 317: 211: 118: 837: 307: 842: 832: 283: 857: 750: 746: 732: 458: 432: 712: 592:
I stand corrected. Nothing at Rotten Tomatoes. Still, it needed some rebalancing and I think I've done a fair job of that. Never seen the film myself by the way.
817: 274: 235: 822: 852: 847: 389: 532: 627: 385: 376: 340: 646: 827: 812: 722: 516: 160: 728:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
508: 713:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131017124808/http://www.transatlantyk.org/en/program/events/special-screening-are-all-men-pedophiles
660:
I agree, a non-notable award which at best deserves a passing mention. To put "award winning" in the opening line is POV pushing.
88: 716: 172: 164: 168: 155: 113: 793: 22: 706: 512: 526: 749:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
684: 631: 597: 582: 94: 76: 650: 784: 692: 463: 437: 522: 266: 700: 768:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
756: 282:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
691:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 201: 260: 250: 229: 665: 593: 578: 723:
http://jezebel.com/5909365/documentarian-tries-but-does-not-quite-succeed-at-justifying-pedophilia
368: 753:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
769: 558: 776: 279: 352: 334: 735:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 717:
http://www.transatlantyk.org/en/program/events/special-screening-are-all-men-pedophiles
661: 549: 798: 775:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
742: 669: 654: 635: 601: 586: 562: 806: 707:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/annanorth/pedophilia-documentarian-eighteen-is-just-a-numb
554: 159:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 381: 147: 451: 426: 741:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 358: 256: 137: 131: 107: 507:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
617:"debunk" the film on utterly different issues than those mentioned in the 176: 701:
http://www.queenstribune.com/feature/Feature_030112_Film-Festival.html
612:
This article seems to have several issues of self-contradiction. The
380:, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the 548:
Apparently the film has also been heavily criticized within the
384:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, visit the
505:
contributor has declared a personal or professional connection
492: 70: 15: 200: 695:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
25:. Review prior discussions if considering re-nomination: 688: 473:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch
388:
where you can join the project or contribute to the
278:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 745:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 292:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 461:, a project which is currently considered to be 573:films). And if it won an award, there must be 175:. To improve this article, please refer to the 838:Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles 731:This message was posted before February 2018. 476:Template:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch 8: 843:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles 833:Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles 535:) This user has contributed to the article. 295:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 74: 421: 329: 224: 171:. To use this banner, please refer to the 102: 858:Articles edited by connected contributors 683:I have just modified 4 external links on 423: 398:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Netherlands 374:This article falls within the scope of 331: 226: 104: 818:Start-Class Documentary films articles 823:Documentary films task force articles 7: 459:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch 457:This article is within the scope of 272:This article is within the scope of 153:This article is within the scope of 93:It is of interest to the following 275:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality 14: 853:All WikiProject Netherlands pages 687:. Please take a moment to review 479:Pedophilia Article Watch articles 209:This article is supported by the 848:Start-Class Netherlands articles 496: 450: 425: 401:Template:WikiProject Netherlands 361: 351: 333: 259: 249: 228: 185:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film 169:regional and topical task forces 140: 130: 106: 75: 721:Corrected formatting/usage for 705:Corrected formatting/usage for 699:Corrected formatting/usage for 312:This article has been rated as 298:Sexology and sexuality articles 21:This article was nominated for 655:22:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 503:The following Knowledge (XXG) 1: 670:07:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 563:15:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 286:and see a list of open tasks. 577:positive reviews out there. 212:Documentary films task force 874: 762:(last update: 5 June 2024) 680:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 608:"Advocacy" and "criticism" 318:project's importance scale 828:WikiProject Film articles 813:Start-Class film articles 636:02:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC) 602:16:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 587:16:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC) 445: 346: 311: 244: 208: 188:Template:WikiProject Film 125: 101: 799:19:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC) 470:Pedophilia Article Watch 433:Pedophilia Article Watch 55:, 27 November 2011, see 685:Are All Men Pedophiles? 676:External links modified 377:WikiProject Netherlands 289:Sexology and sexuality 267:Human sexuality portal 236:Sexology and sexuality 205: 83:This article is rated 517:neutral point of view 204: 87:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 35:, 16 April 2022, see 743:regular verification 509:conflict of interest 404:Netherlands articles 733:After February 2018 161:join the discussion 787:InternetArchiveBot 738:InternetArchiveBot 568:Critical reception 369:Netherlands portal 206: 89:content assessment 45:, 9 May 2012, see 763: 541: 540: 491: 490: 487: 486: 420: 419: 416: 415: 412: 411: 328: 327: 324: 323: 223: 222: 219: 218: 163:and see lists of 69: 68: 65: 64: 865: 797: 788: 761: 760: 739: 641:"award-winning"? 500: 499: 493: 481: 480: 477: 474: 471: 454: 447: 446: 441: 429: 422: 406: 405: 402: 399: 396: 371: 366: 365: 364: 355: 348: 347: 337: 330: 300: 299: 296: 293: 290: 269: 264: 263: 253: 246: 245: 240: 232: 225: 193: 192: 189: 186: 183: 156:WikiProject Film 150: 145: 144: 143: 134: 127: 126: 121: 110: 103: 86: 80: 79: 71: 27: 26: 16: 873: 872: 868: 867: 866: 864: 863: 862: 803: 802: 791: 786: 754: 747:have permission 737: 693:this simple FaQ 678: 643: 610: 570: 546: 523:Janwillembreure 497: 478: 475: 472: 469: 468: 435: 403: 400: 397: 394: 393: 367: 362: 360: 297: 294: 291: 288: 287: 280:human sexuality 265: 258: 238: 190: 187: 184: 181: 180: 146: 141: 139: 116: 84: 12: 11: 5: 871: 869: 861: 860: 855: 850: 845: 840: 835: 830: 825: 820: 815: 805: 804: 781: 780: 773: 726: 725: 719: 711:Added archive 709: 703: 677: 674: 673: 672: 642: 639: 628:80.187.109.151 609: 606: 605: 604: 594:ZarhanFastfire 579:ZarhanFastfire 569: 566: 550:lolita fashion 545: 544:Lolita fashion 542: 539: 538: 537: 536: 501: 489: 488: 485: 484: 482: 455: 443: 442: 430: 418: 417: 414: 413: 410: 409: 407: 373: 372: 356: 344: 343: 338: 326: 325: 322: 321: 314:Low-importance 310: 304: 303: 301: 284:the discussion 271: 270: 254: 242: 241: 239:Low‑importance 233: 221: 220: 217: 216: 207: 197: 196: 194: 152: 151: 135: 123: 122: 111: 99: 98: 92: 81: 67: 66: 63: 62: 61: 60: 50: 40: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 870: 859: 856: 854: 851: 849: 846: 844: 841: 839: 836: 834: 831: 829: 826: 824: 821: 819: 816: 814: 811: 810: 808: 801: 800: 795: 790: 789: 778: 774: 771: 767: 766: 765: 758: 752: 748: 744: 740: 734: 729: 724: 720: 718: 714: 710: 708: 704: 702: 698: 697: 696: 694: 690: 686: 681: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 658: 657: 656: 652: 648: 647:2.247.101.129 640: 638: 637: 633: 629: 623: 620: 615: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 590: 589: 588: 584: 580: 576: 567: 565: 564: 560: 556: 551: 543: 534: 531: 528: 524: 521: 520: 518: 514: 513:autobiography 510: 506: 502: 495: 494: 483: 466: 465: 460: 456: 453: 449: 448: 444: 439: 434: 431: 428: 424: 408: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 370: 359: 357: 354: 350: 349: 345: 342: 339: 336: 332: 319: 315: 309: 306: 305: 302: 285: 281: 277: 276: 268: 262: 257: 255: 252: 248: 247: 243: 237: 234: 231: 227: 214: 213: 203: 199: 198: 195: 191:film articles 178: 174: 173:documentation 170: 166: 162: 158: 157: 149: 138: 136: 133: 129: 128: 124: 120: 115: 112: 109: 105: 100: 96: 90: 82: 78: 73: 72: 58: 54: 51: 48: 44: 41: 38: 34: 31: 30: 29: 28: 24: 20: 18: 17: 785: 782: 757:source check 736: 730: 727: 682: 679: 644: 624: 618: 613: 611: 574: 571: 547: 529: 504: 462: 386:project page 375: 313: 273: 210: 154: 95:WikiProjects 52: 42: 33:No consensus 32: 395:Netherlands 382:Netherlands 341:Netherlands 148:Film portal 119:Documentary 85:Start-class 807:Categories 794:Report bug 555:惑乱 Wakuran 390:discussion 177:guidelines 165:open tasks 57:discussion 47:discussion 37:discussion 777:this tool 770:this tool 662:MaxBrowne 783:Cheers.— 533:contribs 23:deletion 689:my edit 619:content 614:content 464:defunct 438:defunct 316:on the 515:, and 91:scale. 53:Delete 43:Delete 666:talk 651:talk 632:talk 598:talk 583:talk 575:some 559:talk 527:talk 182:Film 167:and 114:Film 751:RfC 715:to 519:. 308:Low 809:: 764:. 759:}} 755:{{ 668:) 653:) 634:) 600:) 585:) 561:) 511:, 117:: 796:) 792:( 779:. 772:. 664:( 649:( 630:( 596:( 581:( 557:( 530:· 525:( 467:. 440:) 436:( 392:. 320:. 215:. 179:. 97:: 59:. 49:. 39:.

Index

deletion
discussion
discussion
discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Film
Documentary
WikiProject icon
Film portal
WikiProject Film
join the discussion
open tasks
regional and topical task forces
documentation
guidelines
Taskforce icon
Documentary films task force
WikiProject icon
Sexology and sexuality
WikiProject icon
icon
Human sexuality portal
WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
human sexuality
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.