368:
name" Rey is known as? So it's a bit random/arbitrary plus frankly it's irrelevant what their real names are - it's trivia and nothing more that Kofi
Kingston's real name is Kofi Mensah, it does not add anything to this article at all nor does it help with the "Out of Universe" distinctions, if it was an "OOU" issue then everyone should be listed as such. it's either one or the other, being inconsistent with a judgment call made by the author is not the way to do it. It was originally put in because one person in one review suggested it - well I'm one person in another review suggesting it needs to be 100% or 0%, not 45,72% depending on the mood of the author.
2535:
wrong he is, we do not do this for actors and musicians who don't use their real name. My prime example is Tom Cruise, when talking about him we write "Tom Cruise" and not "Thomas
Mapother IV". Same thing applies here with Triple H, he uses that name even outside of wrestling and is never called under his real name. He is even credited in the movie "Blade: Trinity" as Triple H). This article should be de-listed immediately (this is the problem with letting anybody review GA nominees, you can end up having articles promoted when they clearly should not be promoted).
2560:
makes it more accessible to non-fans, take it up with your project that they insist on the "ring name (real name)" construction at all, I'm just saying that if it's a rule it has to be consistent and you guys never did anything but create a vague definition of when it's there and when it's not. Oh and have a pleasant day sunshine. In conclusion - your problem is with policy, not this article and frankly I can't be bothered to do anything else about it, get the policy changed and I'm sure Will will be happy to change it.
2595:
well known both as Dustin Rhodes and as
Goldust), Wrestlinglover just disagrees with that. I would switch the article to just ringnames, but then Wrestlinglover would just revert and claim some BS about that not being OOU. When I tried switching the article back to the standards set by WP:PW, Will just reverted it. As for your second comment, that just shows your immaturity and another reason to restrict who can review GA-nominees.
443:, you see "Tom Cruise" (not Thomas Mapother IV). I think this GA nomination should fail the article has to use every wrestlers real name for no good reason. I oppose promoting this article while the WillC's current format is used (especially since we have had PPV article's promoted to FA status without using every one of their real names, even though many of them are not known at all by their real name).
404:
listed as Al Bundy anywhere else. My take is that it should be for none of the names as it's jut a matter of trivia what Kofi
Kingston's real name is it does not add anything to the article, in movie/TV articles stating the name of the actor makes sense as he's generally referred to as that when mentioned anywhere - wrestlers, not so much.
513:
what is done elsewhere. This is a wrestling article. All articles are different. Hell, wrestlers can't have common names. They've had too many different ring names, like Trips and appeared under their real name a time or two outside of wrestling. You can continue with your harrasment. Wrestling is just a giant film.--
1684:, it has a lot of issues, mainly with the prose and I haven't mention all of them I'm sure, it'd be great if someone could not only address the points I've made but had a serious look at the match descriptions as they are definitely not GA level writing right now. This needs a lot of rewrites before it's ready.
2559:
And a good day to you as well, if you read the comments I insisted that this article was consistent, either all names nor no names - I'd prefer no "real names" at all as I find it nothing but trivial but there seems to be a consensus from the project you're a member off TJ that putting the real names
2598:
You may have noticed that it was me that said either all have real names or none, as long as it's consistent - so don't blame Will for it being "all names". I'd rather see no real names, I think that listing their real names is just trivia, but that does not seem to be the semi-quasi-sorta policy so
2534:
This is a pure joke, it is NOT a Good
Article and should not have been promoted. First, there is the name issues. Wrestlinglover is obsessed with going against guidelines and policies by listing every wrestler by their real name regardless of how well known they are (and ignoring me pointing out how
1823:
Factual error, Armageddon did not in itself gross 15.9 million in ticket sales, it didn't even gross 15.9 million at all - later on it's state that the WWE grossed 15.9 million in PPV revenue in 2008, Armageddon may have contributed to that (or it may have lost money) but it did not gross the entire
81:
Disclaimer: I am indeed a big wrestling fan and a frequent editor of professional wrestling articles but the only edits I've ever made to this article is upgrading three "questionable" sources to three reliable ones, nothing else. I am not a member of the Pro
Wrestling project either and will review
2594:
The semi-consensus (a lot of members disagree with it and think we don't need to list real names) at WP:PW is to use the most common name the wrestler is known as (and to only use real names if the wrestler is relatively new or has been well known by multiple names, like how Dustin
Runnels has been
2271:
It is supposed to be giving the keys points to the move so people who don't know what the moves are can understand without going to the link. Plus the move names are considered jargon so they have to be explained out. It was agreed to cut down the descriptions to better fit the articles. The Styles
512:
What is the name of this article? Oh yeah, Armageddon (2008). Not Tom Cruise. Lets look, Triple H is common in wrestling, but is it common everywhere? If he was to go to a movie primere would they say here comes Triple H. No, because he isn't known enough to even get to go to one. It doesn't matter
469:
and it had everyone's real name next to the ring name. The wrestlers play characters. We should mention that. It was agreed to have the real name listed next to the ring name. So to follow consensus it should be this way. The common name thing was decided between you and Truco.--19:32, 28 June 2009
475:
I noticed that you conveniently skipped over my point about how non-wrestling articles don't do this. Do you intent to go and (for example) change every link to Tom Cruise to say ]? That is EXACTLY what you are trying to do. This will not be a good article if the format you want to use stays in, I
438:
If it is one way or the other, it should be all ringnames as this article is about the event, which means the characters. I see no reason to have to list their real name when we don't do that for other people. In an article that mentions Snoop Dogg for example, you don't write "Snoop Dog (Cordozar
367:
Is Koslov more known as "Oleg
Prudeus"?? Also the distinction seems to be totally arbitrary here as you've got Kofi Kingston mentioned yet he's wrestled 99% of his time as "Kofi Kingston" and is definitely best known as Kingston and nothing else. Also how is "Oscar Gutierez" in any way the "common
403:
So it has nothing to do with having been known under other names but "how widely they are known", again I don't see a clear definition of what goes where then. And if it's like for actors then it should be for everyone, after all just cause you play Al Bundy for so many years does not mean you're
382:
I agree, it should be for all the names. But it seems the consensus is to only have it for ones who are not widely known. For people like Edge, he has wrestled for many many years and won several championships under that name, so that is his common name. While
Kingston has won championships under
343:
you list Koslov as "(Oleg
Prudious)" while most others are not listed like that. Please be consistent and do it everywhere or nowhere, this in between with no rhyme or reason is just confusing. Link the ring name, mentions of Prince aren't listed as "Prince (Prince Rogers Nelson)" after all. It's
1492:
Out of 26 references 20 of them are from the WWE themselves, so you've got 77% Primary sources - I'm sorry but to me that's not really good enough for a "Good Article", 3rd party sources helps with neutrality and need to be used for more than the HSBC's normal capacity and the billboard charts.
533:
So you are admitting that you have no valid argument to support you? Triple H uses that name when he appears outside of wrestling too. He is credited as that in the movie "Blade: Trinity", he was credited as that on Saturday Night Live and MadTV, etc. How am I harassing anybody by applying a WP
1798:"Several matches were featured on the undercard.", a very short sentence, almost a fragment could it not be merged with the mention of the Punk/Mysterio & Orton/Batista match. That would also eliminate the odd "were two featured" end to the next sentence. 2 birds, 1 stone.
383:
that name, but not known widely. Rey as wrestled has Rey Jr which could be considered another ring name. The reason to list names is the wrestlers play characters. Like in films articles. The actors play characters, and to show this their name is listed next to the character.--
1598:
Source 22: Having read it it's clear that it has not been state if Armageddon even made money - yes PPV's earned "X" but if Armageddon lost say 2 mil it actually did not contribute. Specific figures for Armageddon is the only way to ensure that this is now
589:"Kozlov then faced ECW Champion, Matt Hardy, but failed to defeat Matt's time in a quicker time than Jeff's winning time, thus having him eliminated." - Matt's time? Generally this isn't very well written, can you please give it a re-write?
1544:
Source #5: After having read it I cannot see what part of the match build it actually sources?? Nothing in the source is actually mentioned in the article and the source does not cover any of the described build. Not an appropriate source.
1628:
Source #25 does not state that it peaked at #2, it states that it reached #2 on that week (it's second week) not if it climbed higher or not - it confirms that it was #2 but nowhere does it confirm that it never went to #1.
538:(which COMMONNAME is) to the article over your personal opinion on what should be used? This article can not and should not be promoted as long as your own personal opinions are being used instead of Knowledge (XXG) POLICY.
1026:"The match was wrestled briefly"... so it was a short match? I'm a big believer in calling a spade a spade instead of wrapping the basic fact that "it was a short match" in fancy windowdressing that isn't crystal clear.
1726:
I see that a whole lot of this is actually rewritten and much better than before. I don't think there is anything outstanding from my previous comments, but as it's had a major rewrite I will have to review it again.
1518:
Source #4: title states "Jeff Hardy Found unconscious" - which made me realize that the build to Edge/Hardy/HHH totally neglected ANY of that, please actually describe more of the storyline leading up to the match.
1186:"with Triple H disposing all three announcers tables.", so he threw them in a dumpster? I do not get this sentence, especially since there are plenty of "tables" mentioned in the subsequent description. Confusing.
2426:
It's an encylopedia, it's here to educate people on subjects - as such I think it would be nice to tell people that the "front flip" is the Swanton - heck even wrestling fans may not think it was the same move.
2267:
Are we writing the description of the finisher to give people an idea of what they are? because then I'm not sure "Holding the person upside down and slamming them face first" does justice to the Styles Clash.
835:
Rey / Punk "execute their signature maneuvers", a generic statement like that is not very helpful to non-wrestling fans, what kind of signature maneuvers? I'd consider rewriting this very generic beginning.
82:
this without bias towards the subject. If you think this is a problem say so and I will withdraw stop reviewing this article. In the next day or so I will be reviewing the article and provide feedback.
1083:
The FU is in no way a power slam, no matter how much his article may try to claim it is, now "Power bomb" may fit the definition slightly better since the FU is basically a "Fireman's carry powerbomb"
1136:
the last match is described as "the main event", perhaps "co-main event" or "other half of the co-main event" relates the fact that the two last matches were generally considered equal in importance?
2226:
I think it's misleading to place Batista/Orton and especially the divas match under the heading "Main event matches", this show had 2 main event matches, the other two need to go under "preliminary"
1211:"only to have Hardy reverse it to have it reversed by Triple H, who would push Hardy away to have Edge run across the tables, spearing Hardy through one." I'm confused and I read it three times now.
169:"were scheduled"?? that makes it sound like there could have been either or six, how about actually stating that the show featured 7 matches on PPV and one pre-show match, clarity is always better.
347:
The rest are known under their common name. The reason Edge, Triple H, etc do not have it like that is they are known more under that one ring name. Koslov is not widely known under one name.--
1995:
Write time the same way through out, one place you have "12 minutes and 13 seconds (12:13)" and the rest it's just "12:13", is there really a point to writing it out the first time?
918:"After a verbal dispute and Michaels making it abundantly clear that he did not like JBL, he accepted his offer" - who accepted the offer? who is "he", "Michaels accepted the offer"
294:"But was defeated by the" - it's not a contest, therefor it cannot be defeated, it was out earned by the previous year, topped by it, words to that effect, pick some and use them.
1261:"he would ascend the top turnbuckle before Triple H prevented him from doing anything,", cannot ascend the turnbuckle if Triple H is preventing him from doing anything at all.
1929:
I do believe that the term "General Manager" is not exclusive to wrestling and will be understood by everyone if you just put that instead of "Primary authority figure"
1932:
It has been agreed that General Manager is still jargon. The term may be used here and there outside of wrestling, but most people may not understand what a GM is.--
1236:
You mention that there were two chairs, one in Edge's hand - then you say "another chair", did he discard chair #2 and pick up chair #3? that's what it sounds like.
671:
That's it? lost the title, won the #1 contenders match? I appreciate that it's not a week by week recap of the Cena/Jericho feud but this makes it sound so generic.
418:
Well usually wrestlers are called by their real name and said known as blank in wrestling. There is inconsistency in the project. I'll make the article consistent.--
969:
The description of the Henry/Finlay match needs a serious copyedit. Just take a stab at the whole thing again, past tense, not passive is just part of the problem.
760:
In the match description you start off with an explanation of the background of the match, yet you have a section named "background" that'd be perfect for this.
614:"A dispute between officials" and then later it was "Vickie Guerrero's decision" - the first one sounds like two referees disagree and not what really happened.
564:
I'd say the link to Brian Kendrick should include the term "The" or unfamiliar readers will be confused, by linking it you make it clear it's part of his name.
1699:
Fixed everything. Above I wrote fixed to almost everything because I rewrote the entire article and everything should be fixed. If not, then one word: Shit!.--
66:
1632:
That is usually the stand. To search through reports at billboard and find the highest and lowest positions. It was deemed fine at the recent FACs.--
194:"in an exhibition against Vladimir Koslov" - Exhibition? that seems to indicate that it was something other than a standard match between the two.
2503:
Alright it looks much better, one last read through and if I don't find anything major (doubtful) I'll promote to GA later today, good work Will.
62:
1460:
Does their managers REALLY need to be listed in the results table? it was mentioned in the text, the results were that "A defeated B" after all.
2175:"performing a knee strike to the face , a move called the Go To Sleep." Again no need to over-complicate it, it just makes it harder to read
2094:
Do you know if the dark match was on the DVD? If so it may be worth noting so that the very small sectiong gets slightly more content to it.
47:
476:
know I will continue objecting and ask for it to be reviewed again. COMMONNAME applies to wrestling articles too, despite what you think.
1998:
I did that as an introduction. It may be common sense to understand that "12:13" is the time, but it is better to be safe than sorry.--
2401:
Last match: Did HHH just let Hardy pin him? explanation needed for why HHH didn't just pin Edge after "forcing his head into the mat"
39:
2272:
Clash is a hard move to describe. So the hold upside down and slam face first is the shortest easiest way to describe it I believe.--
1346:
The CM Punk section is clunky. Could stand to have maybe three sentences all together instead of 1 regular and a long elaborate one.
1264:
Hate to be harsh but the Edge/HHH/Hardy match description is really bad. Needs a total overhaul to make sense and flow a bit better.
1051:
If it's the intention of explaining the Faithbreaker for non-wrestling fans then "inverted belly to back" does not really help much.
2578:
Oh and I think you need to be clearer, you mean "this is the problem with letting people who disagree with TJ Spyke" review GA's.
269:"This enabled PPV revenue to increase" - really odd sentence, how about straight out that it earned 15.9 million in revenue?
144:
First time the term wrestler is use it should be "Professional wrestler" to make it crystal clear what we're talking about.
890:
Following this match" - perhaps "the match" or "that match", but not this as no match has been described in the paragraph.
2062:
you don't have to say "won their respective singles matches" when you've already stated it was "four standard matches"
1952:
Ah yes, no need to remind me why I'm not a member of WP:PW, alright fair enough it's the "standard", I'll leave it be.
995:"knocking Batista to the outside of the ring, only to Batista gain the advantage in the match" or something like that.
337:
Urgh the "WP:PW Scripted event" disclaimer is so lame, but it's the established wording so I'll just leave it alone.
1878:
In the second paragraph you forgot to mention that it was the main rivalry of smackdown, not of the entire WWE.
1773:
It's worded to indicate that Hardy/HHH/Edge was the only main event, wasn't the Cena/Jericho the co-main event?
696:
Regal was without an "official challenger", I'm sure there were plenty of people who'd like to challenge him ;)
119:"It was the ninth annual event" - probably the 9th annual Armageddon event right? that's just not what it says.
2488:
2438:
2412:
2387:
2362:
2321:
2280:
2237:
2212:
2186:
2160:
2131:
2105:
2073:
2048:
2006:
1981:
1940:
1915:
1889:
1855:
1835:
1809:
1784:
1749:
1707:
1665:
1640:
1614:
1584:
1556:
1530:
1504:
1471:
1439:
1414:
1389:
1357:
1332:
1307:
1275:
1247:
1222:
1197:
1172:
1147:
1122:
1094:
1062:
1037:
1009:
980:
955:
929:
901:
876:
847:
821:
796:
771:
739:
707:
682:
657:
625:
600:
575:
521:
426:
391:
355:
316:
280:
255:
230:
205:
180:
155:
130:
2120:"and slammed him down with a chokeslam". You described the move and linked it, no need to over-complicate it.
1428:
One "reception"? that's hardly broad in coverage of the shows reception as it just covers "one man's opinion"
1111:
the "F" in STFU stands for "facelock", which is not a sleeper, it is in fact a facelock as the name implies.
1321:
Nothing on Cena/Jericho? the fact that Armageddon may have concluded their running feud could be mentioned.
2037:"As a result of the tie, neither" just to make it crystal clear why no one was announced as the contender.
943:"in a match in a match dubbed a Belfast Brawl, which would be a match without no disqualifications." =: -->
2201:"Batista followed by pinning Orton and becoming the victor of the encounter" - Again over-complicating it
55:
17:
646:
in the article, I'd like to see all passive tenses like this eliminated, use past tense but not passive.
244:
When you mention that it was less buys it'd be helpful to throw in the figure of how many buys that was.
2229:
Fixed. Mainly was give room to the Hardt picture and since Orton/Batista was one of the main matches.--
2481:
2463:
That's what I've found, a much smaller "laundry list" than the previous article. Good work so far.
2431:
2405:
2380:
2355:
2333:
Hey that's why I'm here :) I checked it out cause I was confused about what it was supposed to be.
2314:
2273:
2230:
2205:
2179:
2153:
2124:
2098:
2066:
2041:
1999:
1974:
1933:
1908:
1882:
1848:
1828:
1802:
1777:
1742:
1700:
1658:
1633:
1607:
1577:
1549:
1523:
1497:
1464:
1432:
1407:
1382:
1350:
1325:
1300:
1268:
1240:
1215:
1190:
1165:
1140:
1115:
1087:
1055:
1030:
1002:
973:
948:
922:
894:
869:
840:
814:
789:
764:
732:
700:
675:
650:
618:
593:
568:
514:
419:
384:
348:
309:
273:
248:
223:
198:
173:
148:
123:
1296:
The aftermath of Edge/Hardy does not need to include the Hardy/Hardy feud, just go to the Rumble.
2543:
546:
484:
451:
1904:"a match involving three competitors, known as a Triple Threat match in WWE, for the" - commas.
1827:
Okay, I've never delt with the gross stuff in PPVs, so this may take me a while to figure out.--
861:
Did Punk catch Mysterio doing the 619? it's not clear how they got from the 619 to the go2sleep.
915:"Talking about his current situation" - again very generic, please elaborate just a little bit.
1139:
Well the last match is the main event which is what this is meant to represent in this case.--
674:
Standard really. I would enlarge it but there wasn't much build to that storyline I believe.--
32:
2351:
Inflicting pain to Jerico's Face and back - forget the "areas" it's clear enough without it.
2604:
2583:
2565:
2523:
2508:
2468:
2338:
2297:
2254:
2023:
1957:
1732:
1689:
642:- this article is littered with passive tense like "would have" instead of "had", this is a
409:
373:
299:
87:
2376:
Other finishing moves are explained but not the STFU? just where it hurts, not what it is.
466:
1903:
a match involving three competitors known as a Triple Threat match in WWE for the" =: -->
1600:
1108:"Knee to the face" sounds like he drove his knee into Cena's face like an MMA style move.
2174:"performing a knee strike to the face to complete a move called the Go To Sleep." =: -->
440:
344:
also irrelevant to Armageddon 2008 that Vladimir Koslov's real name is Oleg Prudious.
2538:
541:
479:
446:
998:
What are "classic Christmas Icons"?? that description is not very helpful or clear.
1570:
Source #6 is for Survivor Series, cannot be a source for the result of Armageddon.
2310:
Link to the aforementioned move isn't right, there is no subheader of that name.
1970:
I'd recommend it be listed as a "Beat the Clock" challenge with quotation marks.
2608:
2600:
2587:
2579:
2569:
2561:
2550:
2527:
2519:
2512:
2504:
2495:
2472:
2464:
2445:
2419:
2394:
2369:
2342:
2334:
2328:
2301:
2293:
2287:
2258:
2250:
2244:
2219:
2193:
2167:
2138:
2112:
2080:
2055:
2027:
2019:
2013:
1988:
1961:
1953:
1947:
1922:
1896:
1862:
1842:
1816:
1791:
1756:
1736:
1728:
1714:
1693:
1685:
1672:
1647:
1621:
1591:
1563:
1537:
1511:
1478:
1446:
1421:
1396:
1364:
1339:
1314:
1282:
1254:
1229:
1204:
1179:
1154:
1129:
1101:
1069:
1044:
1023:
You'd probably put a comma after "icons" even after you explain what that means.
1016:
987:
962:
936:
908:
883:
854:
828:
803:
778:
746:
714:
689:
664:
632:
607:
582:
553:
528:
491:
458:
433:
413:
405:
398:
377:
369:
362:
323:
303:
295:
287:
262:
237:
212:
187:
162:
137:
91:
83:
2459:
The source states that the 2007 Armageddon got 237.000 buys, you state 350.000
994:"knocking Batista to the outside to have the latter gain the advantage" =: -->
2518:
I've read it, nothing jumped out so I'm promoting it to GA, congratulations.
2018:
Good point, I've been preaching clarity so extra points for having it :)
1161:"Outside area", sounds like they left the arena, not just the ring.
944:"In a match without disqualifications, billed as a "Belfast Brawl".
2379:
It is hard to explain the move without going in depth. Fixed.--
1463:
Somewhat, it is the standard/ Usually the managers interfere.--
105:
Resolved Review comments on previous version of the article
219:
You cannot "gross an attendance", grossing is for money.
810:
Same sentence, before back to back isn't very dynamic.
74:
43:
2249:
I see that now, but still it's more correct this way.
1764:
Alright mostly new-ish article, mostly new-ish review
2119:"and slammed him down to perform a chokeslam" =: -->
785:"before executing with a chokeslam" drop the "with"
728:Was the dark match a title or non-title match?
96:Alright I'm posting comments as I read along.
8:
2149:tournament, not "Championship tournament".
439:Broadus, Jr.)". Same thing with actors. In
99:
1378:Maybe state why the capacity was reduced
1573:No sources on the CM Punk "Aftermath"
2404:I didn't know, but now I do. Fixed.--
465:TJ the most recnt FA that passed was
7:
2599:it's nothing I can do to change it.
1403:Notes on the lead applies here too.
2313:Fixed. Didn't know it was wrong.--
24:
1680:I've placed the GA nomination on
1654:Source #26 - Link does not work.
2292:Alright WP:PW policy and all.
2145:Intercontinental CHampionship
864:", and earning a match" =: -->
1:
2036:"As a result, neither" =: -->
865:", earning CM Punk a match"
2631:
1757:16:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
1737:08:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
1715:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1694:03:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
1673:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1648:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1622:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1592:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1564:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1538:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1512:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1479:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1447:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1422:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1397:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1365:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1340:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1315:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1283:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1255:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1230:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1205:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1180:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1155:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1130:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1102:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1070:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1045:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
1017:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
988:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
963:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
937:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
909:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
884:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
855:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
829:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
804:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
779:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
747:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
715:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
690:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
665:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
633:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
608:01:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
583:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
529:16:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
492:16:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
459:18:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
434:19:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
414:18:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
399:18:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
378:17:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
363:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
324:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
304:03:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
288:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
263:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
238:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
213:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
188:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
163:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
138:13:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
92:12:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
2609:16:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2588:15:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2570:15:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2551:14:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2528:07:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2513:07:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2496:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2473:09:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2446:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2420:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2395:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2370:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2343:07:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2329:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2302:07:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2288:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2259:07:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2245:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2220:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2194:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2168:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2139:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2113:20:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2081:19:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2056:19:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2028:07:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
2014:19:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1989:19:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1962:07:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
1948:19:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1923:19:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1897:19:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1863:05:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
1843:19:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1817:19:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1792:19:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
554:19:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
18:Talk:Armageddon (2008)
755:Preliminary matches
1847:Should be fixed.--
1078:Main event matches
1722:
1721:
1601:Original Research
2622:
2548:
2546:
2541:
2493:
2486:
2443:
2436:
2417:
2410:
2392:
2385:
2367:
2360:
2326:
2319:
2285:
2278:
2242:
2235:
2217:
2210:
2191:
2184:
2165:
2158:
2136:
2129:
2110:
2103:
2078:
2071:
2053:
2046:
2011:
2004:
1986:
1979:
1945:
1938:
1920:
1913:
1894:
1887:
1860:
1853:
1840:
1833:
1814:
1807:
1789:
1782:
1754:
1747:
1712:
1705:
1670:
1663:
1645:
1638:
1619:
1612:
1589:
1582:
1561:
1554:
1535:
1528:
1509:
1502:
1476:
1469:
1444:
1437:
1419:
1412:
1394:
1387:
1362:
1355:
1337:
1330:
1312:
1305:
1280:
1273:
1252:
1245:
1227:
1220:
1202:
1195:
1177:
1170:
1152:
1145:
1127:
1120:
1099:
1092:
1067:
1060:
1042:
1035:
1014:
1007:
985:
978:
960:
953:
934:
927:
906:
899:
881:
874:
852:
845:
826:
819:
801:
794:
776:
769:
744:
737:
712:
705:
687:
680:
662:
655:
630:
623:
605:
598:
580:
573:
551:
549:
544:
526:
519:
489:
487:
482:
456:
454:
449:
431:
424:
396:
389:
360:
353:
321:
314:
285:
278:
260:
253:
235:
228:
210:
203:
185:
178:
160:
153:
135:
128:
106:
100:
79:
70:
51:
2630:
2629:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2544:
2539:
2537:
2489:
2482:
2439:
2432:
2413:
2406:
2388:
2381:
2363:
2356:
2322:
2315:
2281:
2274:
2238:
2231:
2213:
2206:
2187:
2180:
2161:
2154:
2132:
2125:
2106:
2099:
2074:
2067:
2049:
2042:
2007:
2000:
1982:
1975:
1941:
1934:
1916:
1909:
1890:
1883:
1856:
1849:
1836:
1829:
1810:
1803:
1785:
1778:
1750:
1743:
1723:
1708:
1701:
1666:
1659:
1641:
1634:
1615:
1608:
1585:
1578:
1557:
1550:
1531:
1524:
1505:
1498:
1472:
1465:
1440:
1433:
1415:
1408:
1390:
1383:
1358:
1351:
1333:
1326:
1308:
1301:
1276:
1269:
1248:
1241:
1223:
1216:
1198:
1191:
1173:
1166:
1148:
1141:
1123:
1116:
1095:
1088:
1063:
1056:
1038:
1031:
1010:
1003:
981:
974:
956:
949:
930:
923:
902:
895:
877:
870:
848:
841:
822:
815:
797:
790:
772:
765:
740:
733:
708:
701:
683:
676:
658:
651:
626:
619:
601:
594:
576:
569:
547:
542:
540:
522:
515:
485:
480:
478:
467:Lockdown (2008)
452:
447:
445:
427:
420:
392:
385:
356:
349:
317:
310:
281:
274:
256:
249:
231:
224:
206:
199:
181:
174:
156:
149:
131:
124:
107:
104:
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2628:
2626:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2591:
2590:
2573:
2572:
2554:
2553:
2531:
2530:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2461:
2460:
2456:
2455:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1875:
1874:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1770:
1769:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1489:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1457:
1456:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1262:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1109:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
996:
992:
991:
990:
967:
966:
965:
941:
940:
939:
916:
913:
912:
911:
888:
887:
886:
862:
859:
858:
857:
833:
832:
831:
808:
807:
806:
783:
782:
781:
757:
756:
752:
751:
750:
749:
725:
724:
720:
719:
718:
717:
694:
693:
692:
669:
668:
667:
637:
636:
635:
612:
611:
610:
587:
586:
585:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
441:Top Gun (film)
338:
334:
333:
329:
328:
327:
326:
292:
291:
290:
267:
266:
265:
242:
241:
240:
217:
216:
215:
192:
191:
190:
167:
166:
165:
142:
141:
140:
116:
115:
109:
108:
103:
98:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2627:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2597:
2596:
2593:
2592:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2552:
2549:
2547:
2542:
2533:
2532:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2487:
2485:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2458:
2457:
2453:
2452:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2437:
2435:
2429:
2428:
2425:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2411:
2409:
2403:
2402:
2400:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2386:
2384:
2378:
2377:
2375:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2361:
2359:
2353:
2352:
2350:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2327:
2325:
2320:
2318:
2312:
2311:
2309:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2286:
2284:
2279:
2277:
2270:
2269:
2266:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2243:
2241:
2236:
2234:
2228:
2227:
2225:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2211:
2209:
2203:
2202:
2200:
2195:
2192:
2190:
2185:
2183:
2177:
2176:
2173:
2169:
2166:
2164:
2159:
2157:
2151:
2150:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2137:
2135:
2130:
2128:
2122:
2121:
2118:
2114:
2111:
2109:
2104:
2102:
2096:
2095:
2093:
2092:
2088:
2087:
2082:
2079:
2077:
2072:
2070:
2064:
2063:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2047:
2045:
2039:
2038:
2035:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2005:
2003:
1997:
1996:
1994:
1990:
1987:
1985:
1980:
1978:
1972:
1971:
1969:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1946:
1944:
1939:
1937:
1931:
1930:
1928:
1924:
1921:
1919:
1914:
1912:
1906:
1905:
1902:
1898:
1895:
1893:
1888:
1886:
1880:
1879:
1877:
1876:
1872:
1871:
1864:
1861:
1859:
1854:
1852:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1841:
1839:
1834:
1832:
1826:
1825:
1822:
1818:
1815:
1813:
1808:
1806:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1783:
1781:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1748:
1746:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1725:
1724:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1706:
1704:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1664:
1662:
1656:
1655:
1653:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1639:
1637:
1631:
1630:
1627:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1613:
1611:
1605:
1604:
1602:
1597:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1583:
1581:
1575:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1555:
1553:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1534:
1529:
1527:
1521:
1520:
1517:
1513:
1510:
1508:
1503:
1501:
1495:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1485:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1470:
1468:
1462:
1461:
1459:
1458:
1454:
1453:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1438:
1436:
1430:
1429:
1427:
1423:
1420:
1418:
1413:
1411:
1405:
1404:
1402:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1388:
1386:
1380:
1379:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1356:
1354:
1348:
1347:
1345:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1331:
1329:
1323:
1322:
1320:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1306:
1304:
1298:
1297:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1274:
1272:
1266:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1246:
1244:
1238:
1237:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1221:
1219:
1213:
1212:
1210:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1196:
1194:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1171:
1169:
1163:
1162:
1160:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1146:
1144:
1138:
1137:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1121:
1119:
1113:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1093:
1091:
1085:
1084:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1061:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1036:
1034:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1008:
1006:
1000:
999:
997:
993:
989:
986:
984:
979:
977:
971:
970:
968:
964:
961:
959:
954:
952:
946:
945:
942:
938:
935:
933:
928:
926:
920:
919:
917:
914:
910:
907:
905:
900:
898:
892:
891:
889:
885:
882:
880:
875:
873:
867:
866:
863:
860:
856:
853:
851:
846:
844:
838:
837:
834:
830:
827:
825:
820:
818:
812:
811:
809:
805:
802:
800:
795:
793:
787:
786:
784:
780:
777:
775:
770:
768:
762:
761:
759:
758:
754:
753:
748:
745:
743:
738:
736:
730:
729:
727:
726:
722:
721:
716:
713:
711:
706:
704:
698:
697:
695:
691:
688:
686:
681:
679:
673:
672:
670:
666:
663:
661:
656:
654:
648:
647:
645:
641:
638:
634:
631:
629:
624:
622:
616:
615:
613:
609:
606:
604:
599:
597:
591:
590:
588:
584:
581:
579:
574:
572:
566:
565:
563:
555:
552:
550:
545:
537:
532:
531:
530:
527:
525:
520:
518:
511:
493:
490:
488:
483:
474:
473:
472:
471:
468:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
457:
455:
450:
442:
437:
436:
435:
432:
430:
425:
423:
417:
416:
415:
411:
407:
402:
401:
400:
397:
395:
390:
388:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
366:
365:
364:
361:
359:
354:
352:
346:
345:
342:
339:
336:
335:
331:
330:
325:
322:
320:
315:
313:
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
284:
279:
277:
271:
270:
268:
264:
261:
259:
254:
252:
246:
245:
243:
239:
236:
234:
229:
227:
221:
220:
218:
214:
211:
209:
204:
202:
196:
195:
193:
189:
186:
184:
179:
177:
171:
170:
168:
164:
161:
159:
154:
152:
146:
145:
143:
139:
136:
134:
129:
127:
121:
120:
118:
117:
113:
112:
111:
110:
102:
101:
97:
94:
93:
89:
85:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
2536:
2502:
2490:
2483:
2462:
2440:
2433:
2414:
2407:
2389:
2382:
2364:
2357:
2323:
2316:
2282:
2275:
2239:
2232:
2214:
2207:
2188:
2181:
2162:
2155:
2146:
2133:
2126:
2107:
2100:
2075:
2068:
2050:
2043:
2008:
2001:
1983:
1976:
1942:
1935:
1917:
1910:
1891:
1884:
1857:
1850:
1837:
1830:
1811:
1804:
1786:
1779:
1763:
1751:
1744:
1709:
1702:
1681:
1679:
1667:
1660:
1642:
1635:
1616:
1609:
1586:
1579:
1558:
1551:
1532:
1525:
1506:
1499:
1473:
1466:
1441:
1434:
1416:
1409:
1391:
1384:
1359:
1352:
1334:
1327:
1309:
1302:
1277:
1270:
1249:
1242:
1224:
1217:
1199:
1192:
1174:
1167:
1149:
1142:
1124:
1117:
1096:
1089:
1064:
1057:
1039:
1032:
1011:
1004:
982:
975:
957:
950:
931:
924:
903:
896:
878:
871:
849:
842:
823:
816:
798:
791:
773:
766:
741:
734:
709:
702:
684:
677:
659:
652:
643:
640:Active voice
639:
627:
620:
602:
595:
577:
570:
539:
535:
523:
516:
477:
444:
428:
421:
393:
386:
357:
350:
340:
318:
311:
282:
275:
257:
250:
232:
225:
207:
200:
182:
175:
157:
150:
132:
125:
95:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
644:big problem
341:Consistency
44:visual edit
1873:Background
1487:References
617:rewrote.--
592:rewrote.--
332:Background
308:rewrote.--
272:rewrote.--
247:rewrote.--
222:rewrote.--
197:rewrote.--
172:rewrote.--
147:rewrote.--
122:rewrote.--
2454:Reception
2147:contender
1373:Reception
1291:Aftermath
27:GA Review
2480:Fixed.--
2430:Fixed.--
2354:Fixed.--
2204:Fixed.--
2178:Fixed.--
2152:Fixed.--
2123:Fixed.--
2097:Noted.--
2065:Fixed.--
2040:Fixed.--
1973:Fixed.--
1907:Fixed.--
1881:Fixed.--
1824:amount.
1801:Fixed.--
1776:Fixed.--
1657:Fixed.--
1606:Fixed.--
1576:Fixed.--
1548:Fixed.--
1522:Fixed.--
1496:Fixed.--
1431:Fixed.--
1406:Fixed.--
1381:Fixed.--
1349:Fixed.--
1324:Fixed.--
1299:Fixed.--
1267:Fixed.--
1239:Fixed.--
1214:Fixed.--
1189:Fixed.--
1164:Fixed.--
1114:Fixed.--
1086:Fixed.--
1054:Fixed.--
1029:Fixed.--
1001:Fixed.--
972:Fixed.--
947:Fixed.--
921:Fixed.--
893:Fixed.--
868:Fixed.--
839:Fixed.--
813:Fixed.--
788:Fixed.--
763:Fixed.--
731:Fixed.--
699:Fixed.--
649:Fixed.--
1741:Okay.--
1455:Results
67:history
48:history
34:Article
2601:MPJ-DK
2580:MPJ-DK
2562:MPJ-DK
2520:MPJ-DK
2505:MPJ-DK
2465:MPJ-DK
2335:MPJ-DK
2294:MPJ-DK
2251:MPJ-DK
2089:Event.
2020:MPJ-DK
1954:MPJ-DK
1729:MPJ-DK
1686:MPJ-DK
567:Done--
536:POLICY
470:(UTC)
406:MPJ-DK
370:MPJ-DK
296:MPJ-DK
84:MPJ-DK
2545:Spyke
723:Event
548:Spyke
486:Spyke
453:Spyke
76:Watch
16:<
2605:talk
2584:talk
2566:talk
2524:talk
2509:talk
2484:Will
2469:talk
2434:Will
2408:Will
2383:Will
2358:Will
2339:talk
2317:Will
2298:talk
2276:Will
2255:talk
2233:Will
2208:Will
2182:Will
2156:Will
2127:Will
2101:Will
2069:Will
2044:Will
2024:talk
2002:Will
1977:Will
1958:talk
1936:Will
1911:Will
1885:Will
1851:Will
1831:Will
1805:Will
1780:Will
1768:Lead
1745:Will
1733:talk
1703:Will
1690:talk
1682:hold
1661:Will
1636:Will
1610:Will
1580:Will
1552:Will
1526:Will
1500:Will
1467:Will
1435:Will
1410:Will
1385:Will
1353:Will
1328:Will
1303:Will
1271:Will
1243:Will
1218:Will
1193:Will
1168:Will
1143:Will
1118:Will
1090:Will
1058:Will
1033:Will
1005:Will
976:Will
951:Will
925:Will
897:Will
872:Will
843:Will
817:Will
792:Will
767:Will
735:Will
703:Will
678:Will
653:Will
621:Will
596:Will
571:Will
517:Will
422:Will
410:talk
387:Will
374:talk
351:Will
312:Will
300:talk
276:Will
251:Will
226:Will
201:Will
176:Will
151:Will
126:Will
114:Lead
88:talk
63:edit
40:edit
2607:)
2586:)
2568:)
2540:TJ
2526:)
2511:)
2471:)
2341:)
2300:)
2257:)
2026:)
1960:)
1735:)
1692:)
1603:.
543:TJ
481:TJ
448:TJ
412:)
376:)
302:)
90:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
2603:(
2582:(
2564:(
2522:(
2507:(
2491:C
2467:(
2441:C
2415:C
2390:C
2365:C
2337:(
2324:C
2296:(
2283:C
2253:(
2240:C
2215:C
2196:.
2189:C
2163:C
2134:C
2108:C
2076:C
2051:C
2022:(
2009:C
1984:C
1956:(
1943:C
1918:C
1892:C
1858:C
1838:C
1812:C
1787:C
1752:C
1731:(
1710:C
1688:(
1668:C
1643:C
1617:C
1587:C
1559:C
1533:C
1507:C
1474:C
1442:C
1417:C
1392:C
1360:C
1335:C
1310:C
1278:C
1250:C
1225:C
1200:C
1175:C
1150:C
1125:C
1097:C
1065:C
1040:C
1012:C
983:C
958:C
932:C
904:C
879:C
850:C
824:C
799:C
774:C
742:C
710:C
685:C
660:C
628:C
603:C
578:C
524:C
429:C
408:(
394:C
372:(
358:C
319:C
298:(
283:C
258:C
233:C
208:C
183:C
158:C
133:C
86:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.