235:
21:
1261:, you recently replaced all of the patents in the Harvard style with simple links to the patent. You said that Harvard style was "not appropriate" for this application. While I in part agree, I do think that keeping one consistent referencing style is important the article as a whole. Under its current revision (your version), the Harvnb template links in the References section don't work consistently, for instance. And I can't see anything really
225:
204:
330:
309:
411:
44:
1008:, and I must say I'm fuzzy on the details myself. I don't want to correct any of your guesses, as I may be wrong myself; I'm just sure on what's in the article, and I've not worked too hard on stuff that should be covered in other articles. To elaborate on my previous comment: I think the article is long and dense enough, and material should only be added if really necessary. And you're quite welcome.
929:"This resonance causes waves to be decomposed into two circularly polarized rays which propagate at different speeds, a property known as circular birefringence. The rays can be considered to re-combine upon emergence from the medium, however owing to the difference in propagation speed they do so with a net phase offset, resulting in a rotation of the angle of linear polarization."
173:
989:* So, incoming light at the atoms' absorption frequency is split by the Zeeman effect into rays with different wavelengths and polarizations. Those rays travel at significantly different speeds due to anomalous dispersion. When those rays leave the medium, they re-combine, and a detectably rotated light beam results.
907:
No special physics background here, but (a) ALFs are cool, and (b) the sections that immediately made the most sense to me were Types, Common components, and
Applications (especially LIDAR). A common guy like me needs a clear description of how an ALF works (like the descriptions in Types) before I
1275:
If I may add my two cents, I don't see any real issue with either style of reference. What's nice about the
Harvard style (which I hadn't been familiar with before) is that it does list the inventors. On the other hand, what's nice about the direct patent links is that you get to see the patent
507:
A very small suggestion... The
Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) suggests that inline citations refering to an entire sentence should happen after the full stop of the sentence. Your article places them before the full stop. CMS isn't wikipedia policy, and the guidelines are a bit unclear about what
526:
Continue to limit the use of jargon, and to include descriptions of terminology inline with the article. You've done a good job of this so far, but as you continue to edit, keep this in mind. Per your user page, the article should be for the curious common man, and parts of this article are
971:
different speeds. However, when light is close to an absorption frequency of an atom, its tendency to be scattered and slowed by absorption and reemission depends critically on how close it is to one of the absorption lines of the material it's passing through; this effect is called
1290:. Furthermore, inventorship is determined by what the patent is actually granted on. Thus inventors can be added or removed from a patent application depending upon what is claimed. There is also no formal significance to what order inventors are listed on a patent.
1319:
A single field of "date" is confusing/ambiguous. Is this the date of filing, the date of publication of the patent application, or the date of publication of the granted patent? The link generated by Cite patent includes all of those pieces of info in a non-ambiguous
1644:
As part of an effort to check all old featured articles, I'm checking the current article against the FA criteria. The article seems to be largely based on pre-2005 sources, and I cannot imagine that development stopped since. There are some uncited paragraphs,
1281:
As a point of information, there are very different criteria for being listed as an inventor on a patent versus being listed as an author on a refereed publication. Normally, for example, the inventor does not actually write the patent. That's done by a
1311:
The inventors are almost invariably not the authors of a patent spec, and authorship implies copyright ownership. Copyright is a tricky issue when it comes to patent specs, and it would be best to avoid any implication as to who the copyright belongs
1315:
The assignee of a patent is important, especially for non-US patents where the inventors may not even be the first owners of the invention. Harvard referencing doesn't appear to include any sensible way of including an assignee (correct me if I'm
497:
for GA status. It is well written, well referenced, and has some very useful infographics. It is a highly technical article about a technical topic, but the author(s) have made a good attempt to clarify terms, and avoid jargon. I've got a few
508:
should be used, but in my experience, the CMS style looks a little smoother, and is what is most commonly used in other articles. You can change it, or not change it, but I thought I'd point it out as something I found a little odd looking.
958:* The Zeeman effect causes each emission line to split into a few lines at nearly identical frequencies, because the magnetic field affects the possible energy states of the atoms. Each line also has different polarization.
951:
around the absorption lines of the gas in the vapor cell. I tried to piece together an explanation from what's available on
Knowledge and the Web. I wouldn't be surprised if this were laughably inaccurate. (Friedman,
1368:
Just went through
Harvard NB references to correct non-working double links (which strikes me as being a silly way to reference, by the way). Sadly, the submit button failed, so I'll have to do it again another time.
1721:
34:
1716:
380:
143:
735:
124:
1372:
Noticed while doing this that several of the
Harvard NB links weren't working even before my edit, showing how fragile such double links can be. I recommend removing all of them.
50:
1741:
346:
543:
Keep up the good work. This is an impressive bit of single-editor effort! If you have any questions about my rationale for promotion, don't hesistate to leave me a message.
1756:
105:
1584:
1580:
1566:
1474:
1470:
1456:
337:
314:
1653:, and the first sentence has only half of a comparison (more effective than what?). If this article cannot be improved via talk, it will likely be submitted to
1265:
with calling the author of a patent its "author"; for the sake of internal consistency and simplicity, I feel that your edit should be undone. What say you? --
291:
741:
Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
1711:
1412:
1766:
1736:
281:
1150:
Obviously it's one thing for me to talk a good talk and another thing for someone to be bold in editing pages. Just hope some of this is helpful.
1751:
1422:
976:. So the multiple rays of light created by the Zeeman effect travel at significantly different speeds because of their different frequencies.
818:
731:
370:
234:
1726:
790:, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change
1761:
1165:
1017:
Bring together in one place the physics of the absorption and flourescence that happens inside the tube. This could help tie together:
1552:
257:
30:
1731:
1654:
1562:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1350:
In the absence of improvements in the
Harvard referencing template, I think the amendments I made represent the best compromise.
533:
Roger. I think I've made everything that's already in the article more accessible, and I shall continue to keep it that way. --
20:
1746:
248:
209:
1627:
1517:
1024:
Why/how do you want these tied together more? They're all explained once, and I believe, in the appropriate section. --
184:
882:
There is an atrocious quadruple-"filter" in the first sentence that comes off so puerile, no? And on the front page!
1413:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060823170658/http://earth.engr.ccny.cuny.edu/noaa/doc/seminar/doc/Jim_Sherman031005.pdf
1308:
This is a list of reasons, off the top of my head, as to why a
Harvard reference is not suitable for citing patents:
978:(True? I'm leaving out attenuation and the exact nature of the frequency/dispersion relationship, both discussed at
569:
33:. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check
1276:
image. This may be particularly helpful in this technology area. Perhaps it may be possible to combine the two.
1583:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1473:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1416:
1161:
1618:
1544:
1508:
1423:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070930200638/http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/Voigt+filter
1398:
1295:
That being said, however, I don't see any problem with using the
Harvard style for referencing a patent.--
841:
813:
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of
1340:
Cite patent template needs improving to include (optional) inventor/assignee, publication etc information
991:(True? If so, is it the same as the Faraday effect due to ferromagnetic resonance, or is that distinct?)
883:
43:
1662:
1646:
1602:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1590:
1492:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1480:
1157:
996:
853:
190:
1543:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1397:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1325:
So, as it currently stands, I think
Harvard referencing is completely inadequate to cite a patent spec.
1133:
Say something about how radiation trapping happens and what the "state selectivity" in passive ALFs is.
1447:
1246:
1232:
1219:
1153:
415:
1426:
172:
1638:
1553:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060823170700/http://www2.naic.edu/~jonathan/pres/FADOF-colloquium.ppt
959:
345:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
256:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1536:
1390:
1258:
1231:
refers to filtering out the earth's thermal radiation, not analyzing it. Article now corrected.-
1228:
1141:
985:
979:
967:
different indices of refraction, meaning that light at the different wavelengths would travel at
935:
787:
734:
that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's
419:
1587:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1477:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1603:
1493:
649:
617:
1210:. (Presumably an error rather than vandalism as it was posted by the article's main editor:
1658:
1345:(I have not yet read up enough on template creation to be able to do either of these things)
1215:
983:
847:
581:
1610:
1556:
1500:
1406:
1337:
Harvard referencing template needs improving to include patent specific reference features.
953:
1650:
1373:
1354:
1287:
1117:
814:
494:
1569:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1459:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1005:
921:
240:
1609:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1499:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
915:
Say something about why "Only light at the resonant frequency of the vapor is rotated.
502:
suggestions for further improvement, beyond continued attempts to expand the article.
1705:
1266:
1183:
1174:
1173:
I think they're fine suggestions and I shall respond to the rest tonight, I hope. --
1025:
939:
893:
868:
770:
711:
683:
621:
554:
544:
534:
515:
1283:
1039:
The selective drop in frequency that allows absorption re-emission filters to work.
908:
can understand the historical context or what the special properties of ALFs mean.
487:
329:
308:
1576:
1466:
224:
203:
1575:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1465:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
661:
654:
625:
230:
1666:
1632:
1522:
1376:
1357:
1299:
1296:
1269:
1235:
1222:
1186:
1177:
1028:
999:
942:
896:
886:
871:
861:
773:
557:
547:
537:
518:
1334:
As I see it, therefore, there is room for improvement in a number of ways:
1417:
http://earth.engr.ccny.cuny.edu/noaa/doc/seminar/doc/Jim_Sherman031005.pdf
911:
Here are more specific ideas that I don't yet know enough to do myself:
493:
I've been reviewing this article, and have determined that it meets the
253:
588:
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of
1207:
710:
Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
686:, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example,
1121:
342:
1427:
http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/Voigt+filter
629:
401:
166:
1353:
I will copy this discussion to the article Talk page itself.
1182:
I've posted some more responses... sorry for the delay... --
963:* In a vacuum or in air, each of these lines would encounter
568:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
1432:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
624:, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link
1722:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1547:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1401:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1144:
article, and I wrote a little more on "state selectivity".
596:, which when you are editing the page, should look like:
1557:
http://www2.naic.edu/~jonathan/pres/FADOF-colloquium.ppt
1407:
http://www2.naic.edu/~jonathan/pres/FADOF-colloquium.ppt
892:
I've changed it. I dunno if I like it more though... --
564:
Compliance with WP standards, peerreviewer script output
1540:
1394:
1211:
443:
437:
431:
425:
136:
117:
98:
79:
947:
The mysterious thing for me was why light was rotated
652:, dates shouldn't use ; for example, instead of using
1717:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
341:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
252:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1579:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1469:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1199:they may be used for analyzing the earth's thermal
1061:Why particular metal vapors are more commonly used
769:I've performed a mighty redundancy edit/copyedit.
49:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
1218:to check this, but it requires a subscription. -
1565:This message was posted before February 2018.
1455:This message was posted before February 2018.
995:Thanks for responding to my earlier comments.
934:If you think a portion of this needs to be in
355:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/Glass
553:Thanks for the review and for the praise. --
8:
1245:The below conversation has been copied from
938:, I'd be happy to synthesise and add it. --
1742:C-Class physics articles of Low-importance
1535:I have just modified one external link on
1227:Sorry-ignore previous comment. Actually,
303:
198:
58:
15:
1389:I have just modified 3 external links on
584:, there should be a non-breaking space -
1757:C-Class glass articles of Low-importance
1671:
305:
200:
170:
819:User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a
1444:to let others know (documentation at
7:
1249:. Please add further comments here.
335:This article is within the scope of
246:This article is within the scope of
189:It is of interest to the following
1712:Knowledge former featured articles
14:
1539:. Please take a moment to review
1393:. Please take a moment to review
462:New photo from Jonathan Friedman.
1767:Knowledge pages with to-do lists
747:pigs are pink, so we thought of
409:
328:
307:
233:
223:
202:
171:
42:
19:
1737:Low-importance physics articles
1405:Corrected formatting/usage for
1241:Harvard referencing for patents
840:You may wish to browse through
632:, but do not link January 2006.
375:This article has been rated as
286:This article has been rated as
1633:17:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
1083:Noise due to thermal radiation
955:, slide 7 got me started here)
1:
1752:Low-importance glass articles
1236:13:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
1223:17:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
1187:22:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1178:13:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1029:22:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1000:20:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
943:13:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
897:00:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
887:07:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
576:for the article in question.
349:and see a list of open tasks.
266:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
260:and see a list of open tasks.
1727:Old requests for peer review
1523:00:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
1377:14:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
1358:17:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
1300:01:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
1270:23:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
269:Template:WikiProject Physics
1050:In the section on ARE ALFs.
844:for further ideas. Thanks,
475:More Faraday filter history
472:More on Stark/Zeeman tuning
1783:
1762:WikiProject Glass articles
1655:WP:featured article review
1596:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1532:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1486:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1386:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
574:may or may not be accurate
358:Template:WikiProject Glass
292:project's importance scale
125:Featured article candidate
1667:09:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
1649:, potential violation of
1216:the Gelbwachs 1988 source
1004:This really should go in
878:Wording of first sentence
872:13:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
867:Already have done so. --
862:22:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
774:19:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
753:ways to turn them green.”
548:16:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
519:03:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
374:
323:
285:
218:
197:
153:
61:
57:
37:) and why it was removed.
1732:C-Class physics articles
558:03:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
538:03:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
51:Today's featured article
1528:External links modified
1382:External links modified
1214:.) I tried to look at
1206:I think this should be
156:Former featured article
144:Featured article review
31:former featured article
1747:C-Class glass articles
1253:--Copied text begins--
1140:That should be in the
842:User:AndyZ/Suggestions
527:borderline specialist.
179:This article is rated
35:the nomination archive
1195:Spellcheck gone awry?
1156:comment was added by
815:Knowledge's best work
53:on September 2, 2006.
1577:regular verification
1467:regular verification
1364:--Copied text ends--
1247:User_talk:GDallimore
1120:or the mechanism of
974:anomalous dispersion
736:redundancy exercises
690:would be changed to
87:Good article nominee
1567:After February 2018
1457:After February 2018
1436:parameter below to
1094:"Sources of noise".
249:WikiProject Physics
1621:InternetArchiveBot
1572:InternetArchiveBot
1537:Atomic line filter
1511:InternetArchiveBot
1462:InternetArchiveBot
1391:Atomic line filter
1259:Atomic line filter
1142:radiation trapping
936:Atomic line filter
570:javascript program
449:Updated 2006-09-02
420:Atomic line filter
185:content assessment
62:Article milestones
27:Atomic line filter
1597:
1487:
1169:
688:==The Biography==
483:
482:
457:Almost Definitely
395:
394:
391:
390:
387:
386:
338:WikiProject Glass
302:
301:
298:
297:
165:
164:
161:
160:
1774:
1697:
1694:
1688:
1685:
1679:
1676:
1631:
1622:
1595:
1594:
1573:
1521:
1512:
1485:
1484:
1463:
1451:
1151:
1072:In "vapor cells"
860:
752:
746:
587:
575:
450:
413:
412:
402:
381:importance scale
363:
362:
359:
356:
353:
332:
325:
324:
319:
311:
304:
274:
273:
272:physics articles
270:
267:
264:
243:
238:
237:
227:
220:
219:
214:
206:
199:
182:
176:
175:
167:
154:Current status:
139:
120:
101:
82:
59:
46:
23:
16:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1695:
1691:
1686:
1682:
1677:
1673:
1642:
1625:
1620:
1588:
1581:have permission
1571:
1545:this simple FaQ
1530:
1515:
1510:
1478:
1471:have permission
1461:
1445:
1399:this simple FaQ
1384:
1288:patent attorney
1257:Hello. Editing
1243:
1233:QuantumEngineer
1220:QuantumEngineer
1197:
1152:—The preceding
1118:Doppler profile
905:
880:
845:
748:
742:
684:WP:MOS#Headings
664:was a great day
657:was a great day
585:
573:
566:
491:
479:
478:
469:
459:
424:
410:
400:
360:
357:
354:
351:
350:
317:
271:
268:
265:
262:
261:
239:
232:
212:
183:on Knowledge's
180:
135:
118:August 11, 2006
116:
97:
78:
12:
11:
5:
1780:
1778:
1770:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1749:
1744:
1739:
1734:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1704:
1703:
1699:
1698:
1689:
1680:
1670:
1647:WP:sandwiching
1641:
1636:
1615:
1614:
1607:
1560:
1559:
1551:Added archive
1529:
1526:
1505:
1504:
1497:
1430:
1429:
1421:Added archive
1419:
1411:Added archive
1409:
1383:
1380:
1366:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1351:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1338:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1303:
1302:
1292:
1291:
1278:
1277:
1255:
1254:
1242:
1239:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1135:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1006:Faraday effect
993:
987:
961:
956:
931:
930:
926:
925:
922:Faraday effect
917:
916:
904:
901:
900:
899:
884:172.162.185.52
879:
876:
875:
874:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
823:
822:
810:
809:
808:
807:
799:
798:
786:As is done in
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
765:Am watching...
757:
756:
755:
754:
727:
726:
725:
724:
716:
715:
707:
706:
705:
704:
696:
695:
679:
678:
677:
676:
668:
667:
645:
644:
643:
642:
634:
633:
613:
612:
611:
610:
602:
601:
599:
598:18 mm
565:
562:
561:
560:
541:
540:
530:
529:
522:
521:
511:
510:
495:qualifications
490:
484:
481:
480:
477:
476:
473:
468:
465:
464:
463:
458:
455:
452:
407:
405:
399:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
385:
384:
377:Low-importance
373:
367:
366:
364:
361:glass articles
347:the discussion
333:
321:
320:
318:Low‑importance
312:
300:
299:
296:
295:
288:Low-importance
284:
278:
277:
275:
258:the discussion
245:
244:
241:Physics portal
228:
216:
215:
213:Low‑importance
207:
195:
194:
188:
177:
163:
162:
159:
158:
151:
150:
147:
140:
132:
131:
128:
121:
113:
112:
109:
102:
94:
93:
90:
83:
75:
74:
71:
68:
64:
63:
55:
54:
47:
39:
38:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1779:
1768:
1765:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1750:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1709:
1707:
1693:
1690:
1684:
1681:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1623:
1612:
1608:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1592:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1533:
1527:
1525:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1513:
1502:
1498:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1482:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1458:
1453:
1449:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1387:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1375:
1370:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1335:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1324:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1280:
1279:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1248:
1240:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1230:
1225:
1224:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1202:
1194:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:67.119.192.12
1155:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1105:Doppler shift
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1007:
1003:
1002:
1001:
998:
997:67.119.192.12
994:
992:
988:
986:
984:
982:
980:
975:
970:
966:
962:
960:
957:
954:
950:
946:
945:
944:
941:
937:
933:
932:
928:
927:
923:
919:
918:
914:
913:
912:
909:
902:
898:
895:
891:
890:
889:
888:
885:
877:
873:
870:
866:
865:
864:
863:
859:
857:
856:
851:
850:
848:Wim van Dorst
843:
832:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
820:
816:
812:
811:
806:
803:
802:
801:
800:
797:
793:
789:
785:
784:
775:
772:
768:
767:
766:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
751:
745:
740:
739:
737:
733:
729:
728:
723:
720:
719:
718:
717:
713:
709:
708:
703:
700:
699:
698:
697:
693:
692:==Biography==
689:
685:
681:
680:
675:
672:
671:
670:
669:
665:
663:
658:
656:
651:
647:
646:
641:
638:
637:
636:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:
609:
606:
605:
604:
603:
597:
595:
591:
583:
579:
578:
577:
571:
563:
559:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
546:
539:
536:
532:
531:
528:
524:
523:
520:
517:
513:
512:
509:
505:
504:
503:
501:
496:
489:
485:
474:
471:
470:
466:
461:
460:
456:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
436:
433:
430:
427:
423:
421:
417:
406:
404:
403:
397:
382:
378:
372:
369:
368:
365:
348:
344:
340:
339:
334:
331:
327:
326:
322:
316:
313:
310:
306:
293:
289:
283:
280:
279:
276:
259:
255:
251:
250:
242:
236:
231:
229:
226:
222:
221:
217:
211:
208:
205:
201:
196:
192:
186:
178:
174:
169:
168:
157:
152:
148:
146:
145:
141:
138:
137:June 12, 2021
134:
133:
129:
127:
126:
122:
119:
115:
114:
110:
108:
107:
103:
100:
99:June 19, 2006
96:
95:
91:
89:
88:
84:
81:
80:June 27, 2006
77:
76:
72:
69:
66:
65:
60:
56:
52:
48:
45:
41:
40:
36:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1696:See footnote
1692:
1687:See footnote
1683:
1678:See footnote
1674:
1643:
1639:WP:URFA/2020
1619:
1616:
1591:source check
1570:
1564:
1561:
1534:
1531:
1509:
1506:
1481:source check
1460:
1454:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1431:
1388:
1385:
1371:
1367:
1284:patent agent
1262:
1256:
1244:
1226:
1205:
1200:
1198:
1149:
1116:Do you mean
990:
977:
973:
968:
964:
948:
910:
906:
881:
854:
849:
846:
839:
830:
804:
795:
791:
764:
749:
743:
732:redundancies
721:
701:
691:
687:
673:
660:
653:
639:
607:
593:
589:
567:
542:
525:
506:
499:
492:
488:Good Article
453:
446:
440:
434:
428:
414:
408:
376:
336:
287:
247:
191:WikiProjects
155:
142:
123:
104:
86:
85:
26:
1659:FemkeMilene
1448:Sourcecheck
1229:this source
817:. See also
792:blah blah .
788:WP:FOOTNOTE
750:a number of
106:Peer review
1706:Categories
1628:Report bug
1518:Report bug
1374:GDallimore
1355:GDallimore
796:blah blah.
730:Watch for
662:January 30
655:January 30
650:WP:MOSDATE
626:January 15
618:WP:CONTEXT
586:
486:This is a
416:To-do list
1611:this tool
1604:this tool
1501:this tool
1494:this tool
920:To quote
582:WP:MOSNUM
1651:WP:PRICE
1617:Cheers.—
1507:Cheers.—
1267:Rmrfstar
1184:Rmrfstar
1175:Rmrfstar
1166:contribs
1154:unsigned
1026:Rmrfstar
969:slightly
965:slightly
940:Rmrfstar
903:Comments
894:Rmrfstar
869:Rmrfstar
771:Phidauex
555:Rmrfstar
545:Phidauex
535:Rmrfstar
516:Rmrfstar
514:Done --
130:Promoted
111:Reviewed
1541:my edit
1434:checked
1395:my edit
1320:manner.
1316:wrong).
648:As per
444:refresh
432:history
398:Banners
379:on the
290:on the
263:Physics
254:Physics
210:Physics
181:C-class
149:Demoted
70:Process
1442:failed
1208:albedo
1201:libido
712:WP:GTL
659:, use
622:WP:BTW
592:, use
572:, and
187:scale.
92:Listed
73:Result
1263:wrong
1122:LIDAR
594:18Â mm
500:small
467:Maybe
438:watch
352:Glass
343:glass
315:Glass
29:is a
1663:talk
1438:true
1297:Nowa
1212:diff
1162:talk
949:only
855:Talk
831:Done
805:Done
722:Done
702:Done
682:Per
674:Done
640:Done
630:2006
620:and
616:Per
608:Done
590:18mm
580:Per
426:edit
418:for
67:Date
1585:RfC
1555:to
1475:RfC
1452:).
1440:or
1425:to
1415:to
1312:to.
1286:or
1203:,
794:to
744:All
738:.)
371:Low
282:Low
1708::
1665:)
1657:.
1598:.
1593:}}
1589:{{
1488:.
1483:}}
1479:{{
1450:}}
1446:{{
1168:).
1164:•
821:.
628:,
1661:(
1630:)
1626:(
1613:.
1606:.
1520:)
1516:(
1503:.
1496:.
1160:(
1124:?
981:)
924::
858:)
852:(
714:.
694:.
666:.
600:.
447:·
441:·
435:·
429:·
422::
383:.
294:.
193::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
