42:
483:
357:
The evaluation deals delicately with what would today be received as patent nonsense by modern readers. However, Adamson is generous in explaining that philosophers were attempting to understand the nature of reality, knowledge, understanding and how the intellect and reasoning functioned within the
337:
While
Aquinas has an evident critique of Averroes in his works, I would be cautious in claiming that the Catholic Church condemned Averroes in a formal dogmatic expression. Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia were singled out as the most prominent targets of the 1277 censure, and a clarification
419:
This is factually concise and gives a proficient coverage of the theory of
Averroes and the Universal Intellect, along with its history, expansion among the latin Scholastics and subsequent decline. Averroes methodology in exegesis and writing were taken up and further
47:
126:
235:
The background touches bases with philosophers who have examined the intellect: Aristotle, Plotinius, Al-Farabi and
Avicenna. There is reference to Avempace developing this theory, but with limitations on understanding
322:
shows the reader how the unity of the intellect thesis, in particular, generated an intellectual controversy in Latin
Christendom, along with a good illustration of how Dante Alighieri adapted this for his political
122:
107:
447:
This page was created on 5 May 2018 and has had 29 editors. The top 10 editors have contributed the majority of the material, and the page is not subject to any edit wars, etc. Pageviews analysis is unclear.
99:
52:
206:
The impact of the latin translation illustrates his influence political philosophy of Dante
Alighieri in the fourteenth century and the critique by other philosophers—including Thomas Aquinas.
17:
115:
435:
Coverage is considered neutral; there is no bias nor leaning toward any particular theory of
Intellect (there are many) and treats Averroes and his works with neutrality.
362:
is important, both to the latin
Scholastics and the post-Aristotelian philosophers as it leads us to the modern grasps of knowledge on this planet, and off the planet.
92:
80:
70:
183:
The brief introduction to
Avveroes philosophy touches necessary bases relevant to his times, illustrating the influence of previous thinkers such as
358:
human. In this wise, Adamson is generous in his summary of
Averroes and his concept of universal intellect. The introduction of the term
166:
Due this being a long article, the GA review shall be broken into the same sections of the
Article, in order to make matters manageable.
427:
156:
75:
160:
334:
reveals the (then) closed world of theological reasoning and presumptions about the afterlife. So a telling inclusion.
330:
showed how Scholasticism and Aquinas in particular criticized the thesis from the theological standpoint. To say that
150:
272:
a process which contains not universal knowledge but "active consideration of particular things"
462:
146:
210:
292:
reaches right back to pre-Socratic philosophy and and is a brilliant inclusion.
243:
Well written prose leads the reader to a neat conclusion for the background:
192:
184:
200:
196:
188:
213:'s conclusion about the influence of Avveroes as a product of its times.
374:
It makes a reasonable attribution to the Aristotelian theory of mind.
332:
the theory fails to provide for a person's immortality and afterlife
407:
Secondary references were examined, verified and well laid out.
469:
The talk page notes this is part of the WikiProject Philosophy
245:
notion of unity of the intellect is his most mature theory
18:
Talk:Averroes's theory of the unity of the intellect
288:
propounded operational union; however the reference to
134:
103:
466:
and the three images are appropriate and informative.
277:
This then becomes a basis for exegesis of Aristotle's
404:
Primary References: all from Averroes and his works.
295:The double conjunction then leads to a possible
8:
386:The references are robust and explanatory.
30:
397:It is factually accurate and verifiable.
299:: the intellect becomes a human faculty.
401:Footnotes are succinct and appropriate.
61:
33:
216:A well written lead; neat and simple.
7:
24:
270:is succinctly explained like so:
481:
161:23:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
513:
209:The lead concludes with
352:reasonably well written
313:reasonably well written
261:reasonably well written
230:reasonably well written
178:reasonably well written
460:It is illustrated by
428:neutral point of view
414:Broad in its coverage
369:Broad in its coverage
360:universal knowledge
240:what was developed.
338:might be in order.
345:Modern Evaluation
89:
88:
504:
488:
485:
484:
286:Latin Averroists
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
486:
482:
425:It follows the
393:
391:Conclude Review
383:
347:
308:
268:Original Theory
256:
225:
199:(Ibn Sina) and
173:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
490:
489:
472:
471:
470:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
449:
448:
438:
437:
436:
423:
422:
421:
410:
409:
408:
405:
402:
392:
389:
388:
387:
382:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
365:
364:
363:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
335:
324:
307:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
293:
282:
275:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
241:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
214:
207:
204:
172:
169:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
494:
493:
492:
491:
479:
478:
476:
473:
468:
467:
465:
464:
459:
453:
452:
451:
450:
446:
445:
443:
439:
434:
433:
431:
429:
424:
418:
417:
415:
411:
406:
403:
400:
399:
398:
395:
394:
390:
385:
384:
380:
373:
372:
370:
366:
361:
356:
355:
353:
349:
348:
344:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
314:
310:
309:
305:
298:
294:
291:
287:
283:
280:
276:
273:
269:
265:
264:
262:
258:
257:
253:
246:
242:
239:
234:
233:
231:
227:
226:
222:
215:
212:
211:Peter Adamson
208:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
179:
175:
174:
170:
168:
167:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
474:
461:
441:
426:
413:
396:
368:
359:
351:
331:
327:
326:The section
319:
312:
296:
289:
285:
278:
271:
267:
260:
244:
237:
229:
203:(Ibn Bajja).
177:
165:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
323:philosophy.
290:phantasmata
279:On the Soul
104:visual edit
381:References
328:Criticisms
223:Background
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
420:utilised.
320:Reception
193:Al-Farabi
185:Aristotle
147:Whiteguru
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
306:Reaction
297:sapienta
201:Avempace
197:Avicenna
189:Plotinus
157:contribs
76:Criteria
475:Overall
281:. Good.
238:exactly
127:history
108:history
94:Article
463:images
442:stable
440:Is it
430:policy
412:It is
367:It is
350:Is it
311:Is it
259:Is it
254:Theory
228:Is it
176:Is it
480:Pass
136:Watch
16:<
318:The
284:The
266:The
171:Lead
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
477::
444:?
432:.
416:.
371:?
354:?
315:?
263:?
232:?
195:,
191:,
187:,
180:?
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
487:Y
274:.
247:.
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.