700:
long he has now been absent, he is currently not a presenter at all, although we also don't know if he is a former presenter as nothing definite that he will never come back, although we expect, based on the
Guardian, that he is a former presenter but then again crystal ball and ... it's not factually accurate to say he is a current presenter anymore is it? He isn't currently presenting the show and hasn't done so for best part of approaching five months now. The box on the right of the article claims "Presented by" and then includes Huw Edwards. But the programme isn't presented by Huw Edwards at the moment. The claim is factually incorrect. It may remain correct in the case of someone on the rota so that someone not presenting over the weekend that still regularly presents is still a person the programme is presented by. It doesn't cease to be presented by Sophie Raworth on days she is absent because, as a whole, she is regularly a current presenter. However, Huw Edwards no longer is. Also to claim he is the lead presenter for the bulletin on weekdays when he isn't is factually incorrect. However, the article says he is the lead presenter and then adds "but he has been suspended since July 2023", which clarifies the position and isn't misleading or inaccurate. Nonetheless maybe the box on the right, that says "Presented by", is wrong. I am neutral point of view and therefore I have no view.
696:
see it, the
Guardian is a reliable source for saying he is not expected to come back. The speculation therefore isn't unverified. This is not "rumors", it is information from well-placed sources. They may presume or expect that he isn't going to come back but, again, it is verified by the reliable source the Guardian. However, Knowledge does not predict the future and we don't know he isn't going to come back. There is nothing definite to say he is a former presenter. However, maybe this also can be turned on its head and there is nothing definite to say he is still a current presenter. In fact, as I see that, it is , if we discount the Guardian as we can't independently verify what it says ourselves, then unverified speculation and crystal ball.
74:
53:
194:
468:
22:
84:
414:
665:
as we don't know what is going to come of this. The situation isn't ideal as neither the BBC nor
Edwards have made any further comment on this since July, and it might not happen for months. Nevertheless, the article should not say he is a former presenter until there is some direct clarification. As
517:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
621:
Because of the ongoing story related to misconduct of Huw
Edwards and him being revealed as the unnamed BBC presenter that these stories were about and therefore him stepping back from the role as main presenter of both the News at Ten and BBC Event programming as well as currently being in hospital
714:
As not unknown with me I'm afraid an afterthought. It is unverified speculation that the programme is now presented by him and
Knowledge is predicting the future that he is going to come back which is prohibited and is what Knowledge is not allowed to do. He is not at the moment a current presenter
695:
It is an interesting point and I am now of no view one way or the other on this. On the one hand, Knowledge is not a collection of unverifiable speculation; however "verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source" and, as far as I
699:
However this is also versus the claim that he is current presenter and, given that he has now been absent for so long, he has arguably ceased to be a current presenter and crystal ball vs the claim that he is current presenter which is factually inaccurate. He is not a current presenter. Given how
642:
Economic forecasts and science are reported on the basis of what economists/scientists expect to happen or expect to be the case; therefore I see the information we have today as justification for thinking Mr
Edwards isn't going to come back on the basis this is very unlikely to happen as it isn't
637:
I was teetering on the brink of replying in July and my apologies for not doing so. I should make clear this is alleged misconduct as we don't know what, if anything, is proven. My thoughts at the time were that he is still presenter of the programme and that it was appropriate to wait as he might
638:
come back and the absence be a temporary one. However I am now of the view this can be changed to show Mr
Edwards as a former presenter, on the basis we hear today that many BBC journalists including what we are told is a senior member of staff do not expect him back:
622:
this will mean he will not be returning any time soon. Should this page be updated to state he is not the main presenter anymore or should it wait until there is a permanent main presenter announced to replace him instead?
514:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
715:
for this show, given how long the absence now is, although he may (this is of course speculation) become a current presenter again in the future if he were then to come back.
429:
565:
555:
602:. I've left out his education, as that doesn't seem relevant here to me, but if others disagree it's still available over there to be brought across.
495:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
492:
339:
519:
511:
507:
484:
743:
144:
134:
448:. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
582:
523:
639:
748:
738:
274:
598:
Following the AfD decision to merge that article into this one, I've copied across what I feel are the key facts and references to
324:
300:
543:
285:
249:
206:
33:
257:
607:
425:
310:
156:
106:
97:
58:
627:
293:
21:
368:
356:
623:
603:
352:
217:
39:
503:
475:
306:
479:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
529:
245:
640:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/sep/02/no-one-expects-him-back-what-now-for-bbc-huw-edwards
480:
267:
662:
441:
235:
670:
news story points out, Edwards is still believed to be suspended on full pay at the moment.--
372:
720:
705:
648:
599:
578:
445:
558:
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
551:
318:
193:
643:
expected by anyone close to the news teams including those involved in the programme.
467:
73:
52:
732:
547:
289:
241:
554:
when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an
673:
496:
363:
592:
716:
701:
644:
110:
89:
79:
281:
263:
221:
724:
709:
687:
652:
631:
611:
586:
532:
348:
101:, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the
550:, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the
571:
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
408:
379:
213:
102:
15:
568:
on the image's description page for the use in this article.
466:
491:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
344:
Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
538:
Image copyright problem with Image:Bbc news theme 2007.ogg
224:
to Good
Article status following previous reviews, create
109:
where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the
453:
449:
420:
226:
182:
177:
172:
167:
280:
Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance:
105:. If you would like to participate, please visit the
522:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
581:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
8:
617:Huw Edwards news story and him stepping back
19:
230:(in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
201:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
152:
47:
546:is used in this article under a claim of
463:Fair use rationale for Image:Bbc ten.jpg
49:
512:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
95:This article is within the scope of
7:
583:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
244:- references and general clean-up,
38:It is of interest to the following
382:following improvements to article.
14:
510:. Using one of the templates at
412:
192:
82:
72:
51:
20:
577:This is an automated notice by
139:This article has been rated as
524:Media copyright questions page
340:BBC articles without infoboxes
1:
725:01:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
710:00:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
688:07:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
653:07:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
544:Image:Bbc news theme 2007.ogg
493:boilerplate fair use template
227:BBC Computer Literacy Project
552:requirements for such images
533:11:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
520:criteria for speedy deletion
286:BBC World Service Television
252:- unreferenced and confusing
250:BBC World Service Television
744:Mid-importance BBC articles
765:
504:the image description page
335:*Restructure the category
248:- over-detailed and long,
145:project's importance scale
632:23:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
612:09:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
506:and edit it to include a
452:; for its talk page, see
151:
138:
119:Knowledge:WikiProject BBC
67:
46:
749:WikiProject BBC articles
739:Start-Class BBC articles
587:08:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
485:explanation or rationale
294:BBC Two Northern Ireland
122:Template:WikiProject BBC
357:Coat of arms of the BBC
325:Stub-Class BBC articles
566:non-free use rationale
471:
28:This article is rated
487:as to why its use in
470:
338:Add infoboxes to the
218:BBC News (TV channel)
440:. Its contents were
436:with a consensus to
307:Criticism of the BBC
159:for WikiProject BBC:
246:Pebble Mill Studios
508:fair use rationale
472:
424:was nominated for
347:Add references to
268:Broadcasting House
34:content assessment
476:Image:Bbc ten.jpg
460:
459:
407:
406:
403:
402:
399:
398:
395:
394:
391:
390:
756:
683:
681:
680:
604:Landscape repton
564:That there is a
483:but there is no
416:
415:
409:
229:
207:Article requests
196:
189:
188:
153:
127:
126:
123:
120:
117:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
764:
763:
759:
758:
757:
755:
754:
753:
729:
728:
678:
676:
674:
619:
596:
540:
465:
446:BBC News at Ten
413:
387:
225:
187:
124:
121:
118:
115:
114:
98:WikiProject BBC
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
762:
760:
752:
751:
746:
741:
731:
730:
693:
692:
691:
690:
656:
655:
624:TheMightyShipp
618:
615:
595:
590:
575:
574:
573:
572:
569:
539:
536:
530:BetacommandBot
464:
461:
458:
457:
432:was closed on
430:The discussion
417:
405:
404:
401:
400:
397:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
386:
385:
384:
383:
376:
359:
345:
342:
327:
314:
296:
270:
253:
231:
200:
198:
197:
186:
185:
180:
175:
170:
164:
161:
160:
149:
148:
141:Mid-importance
137:
131:
130:
128:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
761:
750:
747:
745:
742:
740:
737:
736:
734:
727:
726:
722:
718:
712:
711:
707:
703:
697:
689:
686:
685:
684:
669:
664:
660:
659:
658:
657:
654:
650:
646:
641:
636:
635:
634:
633:
629:
625:
616:
614:
613:
609:
605:
601:
594:
591:
589:
588:
584:
580:
570:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
557:
553:
549:
545:
537:
535:
534:
531:
527:
526:. Thank you.
525:
521:
515:
513:
509:
505:
502:Please go to
500:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
469:
462:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
418:
411:
410:
381:
377:
374:
370:
366:
365:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
341:
337:
336:
334:
332:
328:
326:
323:
321:
320:
315:
312:
308:
305:
303:
302:
297:
295:
291:
290:BBC Lifestyle
287:
283:
279:
277:
276:
271:
269:
265:
262:
260:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
242:Chucklevision
240:
238:
237:
232:
228:
223:
219:
215:
211:
209:
208:
203:
202:
199:
195:
191:
190:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:
171:
169:
166:
165:
163:
162:
158:
155:
154:
150:
146:
142:
136:
133:
132:
129:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
713:
698:
694:
672:
671:
667:
620:
600:this section
597:
576:
541:
528:
516:
501:
488:
474:
473:
437:
434:21 July 2017
433:
419:
373:See comments
369:Good article
362:
330:
329:
317:
316:
311:See comments
299:
298:
273:
272:
256:
255:
234:
233:
205:
204:
140:
125:BBC articles
107:project page
96:
40:WikiProjects
661:It's still
593:Paul Royall
556:explanation
450:its history
421:Paul Royall
30:Start-class
733:Categories
663:WP:CRYSTAL
579:FairuseBot
542:The image
364:Dad's Army
353:assessment
111:BBC Portal
90:BBC portal
378:Reassess
282:BBC Japan
668:Guardian
548:fair use
497:fair use
481:fair use
426:deletion
264:BBC News
258:Copyedit
222:BBC News
212:Improve
361:Return
349:Goa Mix
236:Cleanup
173:history
143:on the
442:merged
355:) and
275:Expand
36:scale.
717:Aspaa
702:Aspaa
645:Aspaa
444:into
438:merge
367:to a
351:(see
331:Other
319:Stubs
183:purge
178:watch
157:Tasks
721:talk
706:talk
675:♦Ian
666:the
649:talk
628:talk
608:talk
585:. --
489:this
454:here
301:NPOV
220:and
168:edit
428:.
380:BBC
371:. (
214:BBC
135:Mid
116:BBC
103:BBC
59:BBC
735::
723:)
708:)
682:M♦
677:Ma
651:)
630:)
610:)
499:.
292:,
288:,
284:,
266:,
216:,
719:(
704:(
679:c
647:(
626:(
606:(
456:.
375:)
333::
322::
313:)
309:(
304::
278::
261::
239::
210::
147:.
113:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
