Knowledge

Talk:Bougainville counterattack/GA1

Source 📝

810: 780: 770: 756: 746: 715: 688: 678: 572: 562: 534: 520: 510: 292: 278: 42: 867:
Sorry, gents, I've got nothing at the moment. Having a bad afternoon (mentally). Nick, thanks for covering off on this. If anything else is needed, I will try to take a look later, but I doubt I can add much more than the simplest of edits in my current funk. For some reason everything seems dark and
389:
Likewise here "...received a battery of 75mm pack howitzers on 3 March..." and here "...six of these units were equipped with 105mm howitzers and the other two operated 155mm howitzers..." and here "...and eight batteries of 90mm anti-aircraft guns..."? (i.e. wikilinks)
356:
I've linked these where possible, but there are several different types of 15 cm howitzers and 7.5 cm mountain guns to choose from and the source is unspecific about what type they were - and given the IJA's practices they realistically could have been of any type.
318:"These troops were divided into three separate infantry units..." would "battle groups" be more accurate term than "infantry units" (as they seem to have had several arms, i.e. infantry, artillery and engineers etc)? (suggestion only) 617:"Americal Division requested permission to withdraw, but the US corps commander did not assent to this request, ordering them to continue to hold the position." Do the sources include a reason / justification for this insistence? 353:"... and was equipped with four 15 cm howitzers, two 10 cm howitzers, eighteen 7 cm infantry guns and an unconfirmed number of 7.5 cm mountain guns..." is any of this equipment able to be wikilinked? 416:
Given the amount of text which passes between the general being introduced and his name being used to open a paragraph, I think that this is OK - just the last name looks a bit odd in this context.
47: 882:
I know it must be hard but try to look after yourself mate (and everybody else can go get stuffed in my book). Anyway passing now as there is nothing else to cover off on by my count.
126: 122: 335:
Looks like a good option to me (I was concerned about the anachronistic aspect of my suggestion but couldn't extract a better idea from my grey matter at the time).
80: 321:
I've tweaked this to "groups" to take this into account. I think that "battle group" is something of an anachronism as the term wasn't used by Japan at the time.
107: 52: 70: 99: 853:
Glad to help of cse. All those changes look fine to me. I'll give AR a chance to look it over and make any changes / cmts but this looks fine to me.
156: 222: 762: 233: 115: 75: 17: 211: 526: 244: 817:
This article looks very good to me. Only a few fairly minor points above, otherwise I'd say its ready for promotion.
448:
Repetitive wording here: "Early the following day, Japanese indirect fire opened the fighting early..." (early x 2)
873: 92: 284: 582:"The Iwasa Unit's attack on the perimeter was delayed until 9 March...." do the sources say why it was delayed? 206: 496: 887: 858: 822: 639: 604: 435: 376: 340: 150: 869: 834: 299:
I think there may be a word missing here: "Barbed wire was a 22,500-yard (20,600 m)-long perimeter..."
250: 198: 883: 854: 818: 635: 600: 431: 410: 393:
Done - thanks to the US Army's pretty strict standardisation practices, that was much easier!
372: 336: 239: 217: 146: 891: 877: 862: 848: 844: 826: 732: 643: 629: 625: 608: 594: 590: 479: 475: 460: 456: 439: 425: 421: 402: 398: 380: 366: 362: 344: 330: 326: 311: 307: 160: 663: 243:: The Earwig Tool reveals no issues with copyright violations or close paraphrasing 228: 868:
foreboding today and all I see before me are those no longer here. Sorry. Regards,
541:
No issues. Article is well referenced and looks to reflect the sources available.
409:"General Beightler, the commander of the 37th Division...", remove rank here per 840: 621: 586: 471: 452: 417: 394: 358: 322: 303: 787:
Images are appropriate for article and are PD and have the req'd documentation.
620:
The source doesn't say. I've tweaked the text to clarify things a little bit.
579:
Most major aspects seem to be covered that I could see. A few minor points:
775:
public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain
232:: Most images lack alt text so you might consider adding it - 467:
Perhaps wikilink "flamethrowers", "bazookas" and "M4 tanks"?
202:: the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action req'd) 654:
Article is focused and doesn't go into unnecessary detail.
186: 178: 134: 103: 839:
do you have any further changes to those I've made?
585:No, the source says that the reason is unknown. 175:Version of the article when originally reviewed 183:Version of the article when review was closed 8: 736:, where possible, to illustrate the topic. 30: 751:(Is illustrated with appropriate images) 831:Thanks a lot for your detailed review. 61: 33: 371:No worries, one can only do so much. 7: 254:: no duplicate link to be removed. 24: 808: 778: 768: 754: 744: 713: 686: 676: 570: 560: 532: 518: 508: 290: 276: 515:(citations to reliable sources) 235:(suggestion only, not a GA req) 18:Talk:Bougainville counterattack 1: 892:09:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 878:08:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 863:07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 849:07:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 827:04:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 644:07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 630:07:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 609:07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 595:07:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 480:06:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 461:06:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 440:07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 430:No worries, happy with that. 426:06:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 403:06:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 381:07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 367:06:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 345:07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 331:06:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 312:06:53, 4 September 2016 (UTC) 161:05:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 809: 779: 769: 755: 745: 714: 687: 677: 571: 561: 533: 519: 509: 291: 277: 916: 683:(all significant views) 634:That looks fine to me. 266:reasonably well written 761:(non-free images have 741:(tagged and captioned) 673:(fair representation) 664:neutral point of view 550:broad in its coverage 599:Ok no problem then. 240:Copyright violations 763:fair use rationales 492:factually accurate 246:(no action req'd). 224:(no action req'd). 221:: No dead links - 790:Captions look ok. 710:No edit wars etc. 213:(no action req'd) 89: 88: 907: 870:AustralianRupert 838: 835:AustralianRupert 812: 811: 782: 781: 772: 771: 758: 757: 748: 747: 717: 716: 690: 689: 680: 679: 574: 573: 564: 563: 536: 535: 522: 521: 512: 511: 294: 293: 280: 279: 192:Technical review 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 915: 914: 910: 909: 908: 906: 905: 904: 832: 661:It follows the 557:(major aspects) 261: 251:Duplicate links 207:Disambiguations 194: 171: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 913: 911: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 865: 814: 813: 794: 793: 792: 791: 788: 784: 783: 726: 725: 724: 723: 719: 718: 699: 698: 697: 696: 692: 691: 658: 657: 656: 655: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 576: 575: 545: 544: 543: 542: 538: 537: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 465: 464: 463: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 407: 406: 405: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 316: 315: 314: 296: 295: 260: 257: 256: 255: 247: 236: 225: 214: 203: 193: 190: 189: 188: 180: 170: 167: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 912: 893: 889: 885: 881: 880: 879: 875: 871: 866: 864: 860: 856: 852: 851: 850: 846: 842: 836: 830: 829: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 806: 802: 801: 799: 796: 795: 789: 786: 785: 776: 766: 764: 752: 742: 738: 737: 735: 734: 728: 727: 721: 720: 711: 708: 707: 705: 701: 700: 694: 693: 684: 674: 670: 669: 667: 665: 660: 659: 653: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 627: 623: 619: 618: 616: 610: 606: 602: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 584: 583: 581: 580: 578: 577: 568: 558: 554: 553: 551: 547: 546: 540: 539: 530: 528: 516: 506: 502: 501: 499: 498: 493: 489: 488: 481: 477: 473: 469: 468: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 449: 447: 441: 437: 433: 429: 428: 427: 423: 419: 415: 414: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 391: 388: 382: 378: 374: 370: 369: 368: 364: 360: 355: 354: 352: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 300: 298: 297: 288: 286: 274: 270: 269: 267: 263: 262: 258: 253: 252: 248: 245: 242: 241: 237: 234: 231: 230: 226: 223: 220: 219: 215: 212: 209: 208: 204: 201: 200: 196: 195: 191: 187: 184: 181: 179: 176: 173: 172: 168: 166: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 884:Anotherclown 855:Anotherclown 819:Anotherclown 804: 797: 774: 760: 750: 740: 730: 709: 703: 682: 672: 662: 636:Anotherclown 601:Anotherclown 566: 556: 549: 524: 514: 505:(references) 504: 495: 491: 432:Anotherclown 373:Anotherclown 337:Anotherclown 282: 272: 265: 249: 238: 227: 216: 210:: no dabs - 205: 197: 182: 174: 164: 153: 147:Anotherclown 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 169:Progression 104:visual edit 722:No issues. 695:No issues. 497:verifiable 411:WP:SURNAME 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 805:Pass/Fail 731:contains 567:(focused) 199:Citations 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 259:Criteria 229:Alt text 157:contribs 76:Criteria 798:Overall 273:(prose) 218:Linkrot 127:history 108:history 94:Article 841:Nick-D 733:images 704:stable 702:It is 666:policy 622:Nick-D 587:Nick-D 548:It is 490:It is 472:Nick-D 453:Nick-D 451:Fixed 418:Nick-D 395:Nick-D 359:Nick-D 323:Nick-D 304:Nick-D 302:Fixed 264:It is 470:Done 136:Watch 16:< 888:talk 874:talk 859:talk 845:talk 823:talk 640:talk 626:talk 605:talk 591:talk 494:and 476:talk 457:talk 436:talk 422:talk 399:talk 377:talk 363:talk 341:talk 327:talk 308:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 729:It 285:MoS 890:) 876:) 861:) 847:) 825:) 807:: 803:a 800:: 777:: 773:d 767:: 759:c 753:: 749:b 743:: 739:a 712:: 706:. 685:: 681:b 675:: 671:a 668:. 642:) 628:) 607:) 593:) 569:: 565:b 559:: 555:a 552:. 531:: 527:OR 523:c 517:: 513:b 507:: 503:a 500:. 478:) 459:) 438:) 424:) 413:. 401:) 379:) 365:) 343:) 329:) 310:) 289:: 281:b 275:: 271:a 268:. 185:: 177:: 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 886:( 872:( 857:( 843:( 837:: 833:@ 821:( 765:) 638:( 624:( 603:( 589:( 529:) 525:( 474:( 455:( 434:( 420:( 397:( 375:( 361:( 339:( 325:( 306:( 287:) 283:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Bougainville counterattack
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Anotherclown
talk
contribs
05:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)


Citations
Disambiguations

Linkrot

Alt text

Copyright violations

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.