90:
208:
198:
177:
380:
the first comment states, this is not a biography of
Brebbia and information like where he was born is not important. I guess it's a matter of balance: more people have contributed than Brebbia and his group at Southampton and they should also be mentioned ("Anglocentric" refers to the fact that Brebbia spent most of his productive life in the UK). If you can't write about all contributors to BEM, then my advice would be to condense the previous text to one paragraph. --
80:
53:
22:
379:
If
Brebbia played an important role in the history of BEM then he should of course be mentioned in this article. It would be nice to have some independent corroboration though (Brebbia is editor-in-chief of EABE). Nevertheless, that does not mean that the half the article should be about Brebbia. As
354:
Seems odd not to have a mention of
Brebbia since he pretty much founded the field of BEM. I have spoken to Professor Brebbia and he has obtained permission from Elsiver to use the text from the paper cited above. I will be reinstating this information soon if no one has any objections, this is after
360:
Snottily can you please explain why a professor abusing their position on a conference committee for whatever their personal reasons were should have any bearing on the content of this page. It does not seem relevant or in keeping with POV? Maybe someone more versed in writing pages could help me
281:
Much of this page should really be remarked as a biography of Carlos
Brebbia. It is also a bit Anglo-Centric, ignoring much of the work done by researchers in continental Europe (Bonnet, Hackbush, Nedelec, etc., etc.,) and crediting Brebbia as essentially the originator of the whole field.
361:
make this article more factual without upsetting the first comments view that it was Anglo-Centric WITH the
Brebbia material included (even though he is from Argentina so again I'm not quite sure how that makes his information Anglo-centric)
421:
This article seems more like an explanation of the reasons why one should not use BEM than a description of the method itself. There is not enough detail of the method here to warrant such detailed criticisms.
317:
This material has been extracted from the review paper by AHD Cheng and DT Cheng entitled “Heritage and early history of the
Boundary Element Method”, published in the EABE Journal, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp
306:
Makes sense. Also, I'm concerned that the
Brebbia material may have been copied verbatim from the paper cited at the end. If anyone watching this has access to EABE Journal, could you check? Thanks.
344:
I also think the biography of
Brebbia does not belong in this page. It is actually longer than the portion which talks about the BEM and should be made a separate entry if to be kept at all.
264:
455:
158:
63:
146:
460:
475:
254:
470:
450:
136:
402:
Is it ok to add boundaryelements.com in the external links? They have a whole book on BEM on open access on their site, and some code examples. --
230:
89:
445:
298:
112:
221:
182:
465:
103:
58:
33:
21:
385:
294:
427:
307:
39:
290:
207:
286:
423:
229:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
111:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
345:
213:
197:
176:
381:
407:
95:
439:
336:
431:
411:
389:
370:
348:
339:
327:
324:
310:
403:
367:
226:
79:
52:
203:
85:
333:
323:
This page needs work - but the stuff on Brebbia should simply be deleted --
108:
15:
355:
all an Encyclopedia and should reflect historical fact surly?
335:, it speaks for itself. the lemma should be speed deleted. --
225:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
456:Start-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
8:
19:
171:
47:
173:
49:
7:
219:This article is within the scope of
101:This article is within the scope of
461:Start-Class fluid dynamics articles
366:More discussion would be nice :) --
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
476:Low-priority mathematics articles
239:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
471:Start-Class mathematics articles
242:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
206:
196:
175:
88:
78:
51:
20:
451:Mid-importance physics articles
259:This article has been rated as
141:This article has been rated as
340:15:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
233:and see a list of open tasks.
156:This article is supported by
121:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
115:and see a list of open tasks.
446:Start-Class physics articles
349:21:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
124:Template:WikiProject Physics
432:18:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
328:04:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
492:
390:02:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
371:22:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
147:project's importance scale
258:
191:
155:
140:
73:
46:
311:20:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
265:project's priority scale
159:Fluid Dynamics Taskforce
466:Fluid dynamics articles
412:06:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
222:WikiProject Mathematics
28:This article is rated
398:Boundaryelements.com?
332:you may want to read
301:) 17:59, June 7, 2006
245:mathematics articles
104:WikiProject Physics
214:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
303:
289:comment added by
279:
278:
275:
274:
271:
270:
170:
169:
166:
165:
483:
302:
283:
247:
246:
243:
240:
237:
216:
211:
210:
200:
193:
192:
187:
179:
172:
129:
128:
127:physics articles
125:
122:
119:
98:
93:
92:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
436:
435:
419:
400:
284:
244:
241:
238:
235:
234:
212:
205:
185:
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
94:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
479:
478:
473:
468:
463:
458:
453:
448:
438:
437:
418:
415:
399:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
374:
373:
363:
362:
357:
356:
321:
320:
277:
276:
273:
272:
269:
268:
257:
251:
250:
248:
231:the discussion
218:
217:
201:
189:
188:
180:
168:
167:
164:
163:
154:
151:
150:
143:Mid-importance
139:
133:
132:
130:
113:the discussion
100:
99:
96:Physics portal
83:
71:
70:
68:Mid‑importance
64:Fluid Dynamics
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
477:
474:
472:
469:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
447:
444:
443:
441:
434:
433:
429:
425:
416:
414:
413:
409:
405:
397:
391:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
372:
369:
365:
364:
359:
358:
353:
352:
351:
350:
347:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
329:
326:
319:
315:
314:
313:
312:
309:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
266:
262:
256:
253:
252:
249:
232:
228:
224:
223:
215:
209:
204:
202:
199:
195:
194:
190:
184:
181:
178:
174:
161:
160:
153:
152:
148:
144:
138:
135:
134:
131:
114:
110:
106:
105:
97:
91:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
420:
401:
382:Jitse Niesen
343:
331:
322:
316:
305:
291:80.75.192.70
280:
261:Low-priority
260:
220:
186:Low‑priority
157:
142:
102:
40:WikiProjects
417:Objectivity
308:FreplySpang
285:—Preceding
236:Mathematics
227:mathematics
183:Mathematics
30:Start-class
440:Categories
424:Wulfgang
337:Snottily
318:268-302.
299:contribs
287:unsigned
325:Kiwimhm
263:on the
145:on the
118:Physics
109:Physics
59:Physics
404:Curuxz
368:Curuxz
346:Gregvw
36:scale.
428:talk
408:talk
386:talk
295:talk
255:Low
137:Mid
442::
430:)
410:)
388:)
297:•
62::
426:(
406:(
384:(
293:(
267:.
162:.
149:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
