Knowledge

Talk:Boycotts of Chinese products

Source đź“ť

222:"The strain of coronavirus originated from China and spread around the world, creating a crisis that led to widespread criticism of the Chinese government, due to its behavior of hiding real figures, including deliberately destroying evidence about the initial coronavirus outbreak, and not containing it on time, enabling the continuation of the 2020 Chunyun period." - This statement appears to be based off of a report, which China disputes and isn't supported by the WHO currently. The report was compiled by countries including the US and Australia, who are amid a diplomatic spat with China. Needs to be reworded for NPOV. 123: 113: 92: 376:. For point 2 specifically, either go ahead and remove it or include the sanctions, but make sure to cite the reasons for it from the article (ex. b/c the Trump admin deem it a "national security risk") and not because it uses "illegal monitoring software/equipment in their phones and technology to track user inputs and personal information and storage of that information for use in Big Data analysis" as a fact, since its unsourced. 296:, Thanks for taking a look at it. In regards to point 2, I still think it can be modified. The Forbes article talks about Europeans debating whether or not to include Huawei in their 5G contracts. The ArsTechnica article talks about a ZTE ban for doing business with Iran and North Korea. The CNBC articles talks about how Huawei could theoretically provide a backdoor to China. They don't directly support the statement in point 2. 227:"Technology produced from China has also been a great cause for concern and has led to further support of the movement, particularly from companies such as Huawei, who have been identified as using illegal monitoring software/equipment in their phones and technology to track user inputs and personal information and storage of that information for use in Big Data analysis." Uncited, needs a citation from a neutral source. 232:"In May 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 China–India skirmishes which were primarily perpetrated by China’s People's Liberation Army, Indian engineer, educator and innovator, Sonam Wangchuk appealed to Indians to "use your wallet power" and boycott Chinese products." - It's Wangchuk’s opinion that the pandemic and the skirmishes are primarily perpetrated by the PLA, not a fact. 61: 32: 273:, regarding point 2, I’ve added citations for the claim that Chinese tech collects data but there isn’t much about this causing a boycott except for some sources calling Trump’s ban a boycott. Regarding point 3, I’ve rewritten it a bit. Now for point 1, I can’t exactly figure out how to fix it ... We may have to rewrite or remove it. 599:
The whole 1st three paragraphs under "Causes" can basically go. It's very broad background: China is the world's most populous country, it has many borders, the Communists took over in 1949, etc. that has no relevant to contemporary boycotts.
251:
Regarding the first point, the presence of citations in the lead of such as long article as this one, is itself a red flag regarding proper emphasis. I agree that it's not acceptable for the article to cite, as it does,
639: 42: 314: 603:
It's also pretty biased, saying that fake products are a "normal" part of development. I don't think our pages need to weigh in on whether actions are "normal" or not.
345:
And regarding point 1, maybe we can rewrite it to note that the fact that the COVID pandemic began in China is being used to justify boycotts by organisations like the
634: 169: 201:
It's odd that the article is silent on these when (my anecdotal original research suggests) they're a big motivating factor in a lot of the boycott movements.
349: 629: 313:
opinion piece calls this a boycott. But since it is an opinion piece and also by China, maybe rewording "boycott" as "sanction" would be more appropriate?
310: 318: 179: 535:- multiple slogans exist and there is no proof that one slogan is more prevalent than another. But all slogans that were on this article 441:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
644: 540: 202: 145: 402: 360: 333: 281: 497: 473: 72: 136: 97: 505: 144:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
575: 432: 395: 373: 353: 326: 293: 274: 38: 485: 469: 60: 544: 206: 611: 261: 256:, a document that is alleged by an Australian newspaper to have been leaked by US intelligence services. 607: 585: 501: 442: 346: 78: 524: 31: 493: 489: 257: 561: 381: 301: 241: 112: 91: 17: 459: 615: 565: 548: 527: 509: 463: 409: 385: 367: 340: 305: 288: 265: 245: 210: 520: 492:), and must do so without seeming to trumpet the clarion call to join the bandwagon, per 321:
sources are calling it a sanction. But then again, would a sanction be relevant enough,
623: 557: 391: 377: 322: 297: 270: 237: 128: 455: 584:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
518:, this slogan is rarely used and this article is about boycotts in general. – 118: 496:. The proposed neutral and precise name follows the pattern established at 484:
but about advocacy efforts to engage in boycott politics. Hence policy on
606:
I just wanted to flag this before I delete basically a whole section.
404: 362: 335: 283: 141: 372:
I think the NPOV tag can be removed once those changes are made,
54: 26: 394:. If the article is good enough now, do remove the tag. 574:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
640:
Start-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
140:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 445:. No further edits should be made to this section. 588:. No further edits should be made to this section. 537:must be changed to redirects to the target page 488:requires a title that matches the content (see 595:Request to delete extraneous / biased sections 8: 396: 354: 327: 275: 58: 431:The following is a closed discussion of a 86: 41:on 13 October 2014 (UTC). The result of 88: 635:Mid-importance China-related articles 7: 450:The result of the move request was: 134:This article is within the scope of 77:It is of interest to the following 630:Start-Class China-related articles 25: 121: 111: 90: 59: 30: 174:This article has been rated as 37:This article was nominated for 1: 498:Boycotts of Japanese products 148:and see a list of open tasks. 18:Talk:Boycott Chinese products 474:Boycotts of Chinese products 424:Requested move 28 July 2020 154:Knowledge:WikiProject China 661: 645:WikiProject China articles 566:22:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 464:12:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC) 311:South China Morning Post’s 180:project's importance scale 157:Template:WikiProject China 549:09:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 528:17:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 510:15:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC) 410:10:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 386:15:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 368:04:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 341:04:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 306:14:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 289:12:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 266:09:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 246:07:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 173: 106: 85: 616:16:14, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 581:Please do not modify it. 470:Boycott Chinese products 438:Please do not modify it. 211:14:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 556:per above reasoning. -- 454:to the proposed title. 160:China-related articles 67:This article is rated 347:Vishva Hindu Parishad 398:RedBulbBlueBlood9911 374:RedBulbBlueBlood9911 356:RedBulbBlueBlood9911 329:RedBulbBlueBlood9911 294:RedBulbBlueBlood9911 277:RedBulbBlueBlood9911 73:content assessment 486:WP:Article titles 480:an article about 194: 193: 190: 189: 186: 185: 137:WikiProject China 53: 52: 16:(Redirected from 652: 583: 502:NewsAndEventsGuy 440: 406: 400: 364: 358: 337: 331: 285: 279: 162: 161: 158: 155: 152: 131: 126: 125: 124: 115: 108: 107: 102: 94: 87: 70: 64: 63: 55: 34: 27: 21: 660: 659: 655: 654: 653: 651: 650: 649: 620: 619: 597: 592: 579: 483: 436: 426: 233: 228: 223: 218: 199: 159: 156: 153: 150: 149: 127: 122: 120: 100: 71:on Knowledge's 68: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 658: 656: 648: 647: 642: 637: 632: 622: 621: 596: 593: 591: 590: 576:requested move 570: 569: 568: 551: 530: 481: 467: 448: 447: 433:requested move 427: 425: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 343: 268: 235: 234: 231: 229: 226: 224: 221: 217: 214: 198: 195: 192: 191: 188: 187: 184: 183: 176:Mid-importance 172: 166: 165: 163: 146:the discussion 133: 132: 116: 104: 103: 101:Mid‑importance 95: 83: 82: 76: 65: 51: 50: 43:the discussion 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 657: 646: 643: 641: 638: 636: 633: 631: 628: 627: 625: 618: 617: 613: 609: 608:PumpkinKitten 604: 601: 594: 589: 587: 582: 577: 572: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 552: 550: 546: 542: 541:45.251.33.118 538: 534: 531: 529: 526: 523: 522: 517: 514: 513: 512: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 479: 475: 471: 466: 465: 461: 457: 453: 446: 444: 439: 434: 429: 428: 423: 411: 408: 407: 401: 399: 393: 389: 388: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 370: 369: 366: 365: 359: 357: 351: 348: 344: 342: 339: 338: 332: 330: 324: 320: 316: 312: 309: 308: 307: 303: 299: 295: 292: 291: 290: 287: 286: 280: 278: 272: 269: 267: 263: 259: 258:William Avery 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 230: 225: 220: 219: 215: 213: 212: 208: 204: 203:92.17.144.186 196: 181: 177: 171: 168: 167: 164: 147: 143: 139: 138: 130: 119: 117: 114: 110: 109: 105: 99: 96: 93: 89: 84: 80: 74: 66: 62: 57: 56: 48: 44: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 605: 602: 598: 580: 573: 553: 536: 532: 519: 515: 494:WP:POVNAMING 490:WP:PRECISION 477: 468: 451: 449: 437: 430: 403: 397: 361: 355: 334: 328: 282: 276: 253: 236: 200: 175: 135: 129:China portal 79:WikiProjects 46: 586:move review 443:move review 350:as per this 197:HK/Xinjiang 69:Start-class 624:Categories 482:the slogan 476:– This is 452:page moved 216:NPOV Note 521:Thjarkur 39:deletion 558:Drevolt 554:Support 533:Support 516:Support 392:Leotext 378:Leotext 323:Leotext 298:Leotext 271:Leotext 254:as fact 238:Leotext 178:on the 525:(talk) 456:Kraose 390:Done, 75:scale. 151:China 142:China 98:China 612:talk 562:talk 545:talk 506:talk 460:talk 405:Talk 382:talk 363:Talk 336:Talk 319:this 317:and 315:This 302:talk 284:Talk 262:talk 242:talk 207:talk 47:keep 45:was 578:. 478:not 170:Mid 626:: 614:) 564:) 547:) 539:. 508:) 500:. 472:→ 462:) 435:. 384:) 352:. 325:? 304:) 264:) 244:) 209:) 610:( 560:( 543:( 504:( 458:( 380:( 300:( 260:( 240:( 205:( 182:. 81:: 49:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Boycott Chinese products
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
China
WikiProject icon
China portal
WikiProject China
China
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
92.17.144.186
talk
14:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Leotext
talk
07:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
William Avery
talk
09:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Leotext
RedBulbBlueBlood9911
Talk
12:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
RedBulbBlueBlood9911

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑