Knowledge

Talk:Bone Tomahawk/GA1

Source 📝

525: 415: 264:— I have no real idea what this is trying to say. Most films keep to a script. If the point is Zahler tried to create the film with as few edits to the original draft, that could be better, but until this point we haven't even mentioned the script, which is implied to have been a recent and bespoke creation. I would just remove this line as it's not telling us much. 42: 773: 749: 714: 576: 548: 498: 471: 439: 388: 351: 299: 270: 243: 215: 324: 293:— the entire last line, besides being confusingly marked by quotes, is redundant with the previous sentences. This dovetails with a feeling of peacocky and POV language throughout, where the article is excessively privileging the opinions of the director (who gets to decide he's "invulnerable" to violence?) 409:
How relevant is this? 1st ADs are not a hugely important role to a general audience. The inclusion of a date also makes things more confusing; it implies everything before that point happened before October 2014 but there's no signposts that verify this. (This also sounds redundant, because the next
890:
Thanks. I performed a to trim some more redundancies. You also have an issue with shifting tense (some stuff is given in the past, some present.) Not sure if I got all of the relevant ones switched to past, so something to keep an eye out on. With the other issues addressed above, I think it's now
681:
Daily Dead is reliable because it is a secondary source on the horror entertainment industry that does not rely on user-generated content nor is extremist. They do have opinion pieces and blogs, but all media has the former while the article does not rely on the latter. Daily Dead has done numerous
290:
Zahler incorporated some details of his personal life into the script, remarking: "Most characters I write have some attributes in common with me, and some attributes that are not. Certainly when Brooder says: ‘Smart men don’t get married’, everyone who knows me is thinking of me. ‘That’s something
505:
Changed to Kurt Russell's agent handed over the script to Peter Sarsgaard, who enjoyed the script and signed on to the movie, leading to him passing the script off to Russell. Moved all info regarding Russell reading the script and his thoughts into a singular paragraph and moved it to the first
345:— Why is the producer the one pledging to be faithful to the script? And why is it relevant he praised it? I don't think producers generally go around bad-mouthing their projects. If the point is that he didn't want investors to make changes, just say that instead of beating around the bush. 184:
Woop, I was sitting here thinking the GA nom was on hold for weeks, but it apparently didn't save. Sorry for the delay! Overall, the article is a good start, but there's stumbling issues throughout in terms of organization, referencing, and prose. Comments as follows:
367:
New sentence: Despite Sonnier's assurances the there will be no intervention in the script, investors still wanted the script to be changed due to conflicting interpretations of the film’s genre, and the film being Zahler’s directorial debut. -
317:
The following paragraphs is just westerns Zahler didn't like? Why is this mentioned here? It feels like it should belong earlier when he's talking about developing a western in response to films in the genre he didn't like.
432:
Again, out of order info: why are details from October in casting coming before September casting? Also, why are you giving details about specific roles? We already got a full cast list after the plot section.
566:
The reception section needs a lot of work in reorganization. It shouldn't just be a list of critics and pull quotes, but go through the various aspects of the film and how they were received. See
492:
Why is this coming after we got the information that Russell was cast? Why is the agent's name important? Why are we mentioning it's the Bone Tomahawk script (isn't that a given?)
682:
reviews for movies, especially in the horror genre, so their interview with Zahler, which was done professionally, should be taken into account. They are not self-published. - 祝好,
708:
References are inconsistently formatted—some have URLs, some are capitalized, others aren't, etc. Some are italicized, others are missing website/publication info.
80: 47: 70: 602:
What makes Discogs, We Got This Covered, onlocationvacations, kathryn-morris.co.uk, Blu-Ray.com, Nerd Repository, Daily Dead, and Next Best Picture
126: 122: 52: 854:
Sorry, I'm a bit busy from internship stuff. However, I've already started brainstorming the reception section a couple days ago. - 祝好,
382:—this stuff here seems again out of sequence, since we've gone from finding investors to the final budget, back to finding investors. 490:
Russell's agent Michael Cooper handed over the script of Bone Tomahawk to Sarsgaard, who was originally cast to play Arthur O'Dwyer.
156: 107: 209:— it seems weird to me we mention the number of novels, but not screenplays, and then add it up at the end. Could be simplified. 75: 99: 207:
Zahler had previously written two novels and screenplays in the Western genre, making Bone Tomahawk his fifth Western work
222:
Changed to "Zahler had previously written four Westerns, making Bone Tomahawk his fifth work in the Western genre." - 祝好,
465:
not getting linked in its first use in a caption, but getting linked in an image further down.) Please check those.
331:
Due to chronological reasons. He watched all those Western films to critique what he didn't like back in 2005. - 祝好,
189:
It's alright. Just a bit busy at the moment but I'll try to answer the concerns below as quick as possible. - 祝好,
262:
Zahler took satisfaction while creating Bone Tomahawk, in preserving within the film much of the original script
288:
I think overall the article relies on quotes, or overly-long quotes, rather than summaries too much. E.g.
660: 625: 612: 150: 531:
Means that the actors all like the script, though in this context, is redundant and irrelevant. - 祝好,
524: 414: 567: 115: 17: 306:
Removed invulnerable to violence mention and reformatted several, if not all, long quotes. - 祝好,
740: 892: 878: 867: 844: 829: 808: 175: 146: 819:
Won't be able to get to it until the Holidays due to finals. Hopefully you can wait! - 祝好,
462: 458: 234: 169: 407:
On October 2, 2014, Dave Halls was hired as first assistant director of Bone Tomahawk.
343:
Dallas Sonnier praised the script for Bone Tomahawk, and pledged to be faithful to it,
92: 603: 517: 489: 406: 379: 342: 261: 206: 637:
Deleted OnLocationVacations and replaced with other sources on the article. - 祝好,
289: 903: 882: 863: 855: 840: 820: 781: 757: 722: 696: 683: 673: 664: 651: 638: 629: 616: 584: 556: 532: 507: 479: 447: 422: 396: 369: 359: 332: 307: 278: 251: 223: 190: 661:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sources
626:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sources
613:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Sources
624:
Deleted We Got This Covered source due to accepting user-generated content.
291:
Zahler would say.’" and "I’m not married and don’t have any interest in it."
906: 897: 885: 872: 858: 849: 834: 823: 813: 784: 760: 725: 699: 686: 676: 667: 654: 646:
Deleted kathryn-morris.co.uk; seems like a blog; replaced with a source by
641: 632: 619: 587: 559: 535: 510: 482: 461:
getting multiple wikilinks in the same section) or bad linking (stuff like
450: 425: 399: 372: 362: 335: 310: 281: 254: 226: 193: 180: 160: 902:
Much appreciated! Thank you for your time! Sorry that this was late. - 祝好,
881:
Sorry for the extremely late response. All the points are addressed. - 祝好,
446:
Removed redundancy of mentioning roles again and fixed date. - 祝好,
410:
section also starts with the exact same "on this date" opener.)
380:
When selling the movie to investors, Zahler used directors such
237:. Also, there shouldn't be any contractions outside of quotes. 739:
The film's theatrical gross is quoted as $ 481,000 but the
828:
I'm happy to keep it open longer for the end of the year.
866:
Have you addressed all the above points so I can review?
233:
Quote marks need to be converted to straight quotes, per
733: 134: 103: 672:
Replaced Nerd Repository with primary source. - 祝好,
395:Moved to the first sentence of the paragraph - 祝好, 358:Removed and adjusted the following sentence. - 祝好, 611:Deleted Discogs as it is user-generated content. 801:Images look appropriately sourced and licensed. 457:There's a examples of either overlinking (a la 8: 736:1, 2, 4, 9, 13, 18, 29, 39, 47, 52, 57, 60. 542:Excessively long quote from the composer. 30: 518:The actors were all onboard on the script 61: 33: 732:Spot-checked statements attributed to 7: 891:up to GA quality, so I'm passing. 24: 771: 747: 712: 691:Replaced Next Best Picture with 574: 546: 523: 496: 469: 437: 413: 386: 349: 322: 297: 268: 241: 213: 506:paragraph of the section. - 祝好, 1: 907:21:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC) 898:19:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC) 835:22:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC) 824:00:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC) 807:Placing the article on hold. 483:19:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC) 282:15:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC) 255:15:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC) 181:17:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC) 161:17:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC) 886:23:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 873:15:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC) 859:21:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 850:16:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 814:16:42, 7 December 2022 (UTC) 785:06:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 761:06:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 726:23:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 700:06:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 687:06:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 677:05:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 668:05:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 655:05:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 642:05:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 633:05:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC) 620:00:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 588:00:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 227:14:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 194:13:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 560:21:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 536:21:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 511:21:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 451:15:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 426:21:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 400:21:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 373:21:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 363:21:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 336:21:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC) 311:15:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) 937: 743:gives a different number. 894:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 869:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 846:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 831:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 810:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 570:for some advice on this. 177:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 767:Ref 57 is a dead link. 648:The Charlotte Observer 555:Shortened quote. - 祝好, 659:Deleted Blu-ray.com. 520:What does this mean? 843:how is this going? 18:Talk:Bone Tomahawk 89: 88: 928: 895: 870: 847: 832: 811: 779: 775: 774: 755: 751: 750: 720: 716: 715: 695:newspaper. - 祝好, 604:reliable sources 583:Renovated. - 祝好, 582: 578: 577: 554: 550: 549: 527: 519: 504: 500: 499: 491: 477: 473: 472: 445: 441: 440: 417: 408: 394: 390: 389: 381: 357: 353: 352: 344: 330: 326: 325: 305: 301: 300: 292: 276: 272: 271: 263: 249: 245: 244: 221: 217: 216: 208: 178: 174: 168: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 936: 935: 931: 930: 929: 927: 926: 925: 893: 868: 845: 830: 809: 772: 770: 748: 746: 713: 711: 575: 573: 547: 545: 497: 495: 470: 468: 438: 436: 387: 385: 350: 348: 323: 321: 298: 296: 269: 267: 242: 240: 214: 212: 176: 172: 166: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 934: 932: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 805: 804: 803: 802: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 780:- Fixed. - 祝好, 765: 764: 763: 756:- Fixed. - 祝好, 730: 729: 728: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 693:Irish Examiner 689: 679: 670: 657: 644: 635: 622: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 564: 563: 562: 540: 539: 538: 515: 514: 513: 487: 486: 485: 463:Fantastic Fest 459:Dallas Sonnier 455: 454: 453: 430: 429: 428: 404: 403: 402: 377: 376: 375: 365: 340: 339: 338: 315: 314: 313: 286: 285: 284: 259: 258: 257: 235:MOS:QUOTEMARKS 231: 230: 229: 197: 196: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 933: 908: 905: 901: 900: 899: 896: 889: 888: 887: 884: 880: 876: 875: 874: 871: 865: 862: 861: 860: 857: 853: 852: 851: 848: 842: 838: 837: 836: 833: 827: 826: 825: 822: 818: 817: 816: 815: 812: 800: 799: 797: 794: 786: 783: 778: 769: 768: 766: 762: 759: 754: 745: 744: 742: 738: 737: 735: 731: 727: 724: 719: 710: 709: 707: 701: 698: 694: 690: 688: 685: 680: 678: 675: 671: 669: 666: 662: 658: 656: 653: 649: 645: 643: 640: 636: 634: 631: 627: 623: 621: 618: 614: 610: 609: 608: 607: 605: 601: 600: 598: 595: 589: 586: 581: 572: 571: 569: 565: 561: 558: 553: 544: 543: 541: 537: 534: 530: 526: 522: 521: 516: 512: 509: 503: 494: 493: 488: 484: 481: 476: 467: 466: 464: 460: 456: 452: 449: 444: 435: 434: 431: 427: 424: 420: 416: 412: 411: 405: 401: 398: 393: 384: 383: 378: 374: 371: 366: 364: 361: 356: 347: 346: 341: 337: 334: 329: 320: 319: 316: 312: 309: 304: 295: 294: 287: 283: 280: 277:Removed - 祝好, 275: 266: 265: 260: 256: 253: 248: 239: 238: 236: 232: 228: 225: 220: 211: 210: 205: 204: 202: 199: 198: 195: 192: 188: 187: 186: 183: 182: 179: 171: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 806: 795: 776: 752: 741:cited source 734:current refs 717: 692: 647: 596: 579: 568:WP:RECEPTION 551: 528: 501: 478:Fixed. - 祝好, 474: 442: 418: 391: 354: 327: 302: 273: 246: 218: 200: 165: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 879:David Fuchs 147:David Fuchs 104:visual edit 597:References 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 328:Not done 157:contribs 76:Criteria 650:. - 祝好, 529:Removed 419:Removed 127:history 108:history 94:Article 904:Sinoam 883:Sinoam 864:Sinoam 856:Sinoam 841:Sinoam 821:Sinoam 782:Sinoam 758:Sinoam 723:Sinoam 697:Sinoam 684:Sinoam 674:Sinoam 665:Sinoam 652:Sinoam 639:Sinoam 630:Sinoam 617:Sinoam 585:Sinoam 557:Sinoam 533:Sinoam 508:Sinoam 480:Sinoam 448:Sinoam 423:Sinoam 397:Sinoam 370:Sinoam 360:Sinoam 333:Sinoam 308:Sinoam 279:Sinoam 252:Sinoam 224:Sinoam 191:Sinoam 796:Media 721:- 祝好, 663:- 祝好, 628:- 祝好, 615:- 祝好, 421:- 祝好, 250:- 祝好, 201:Prose 170:doing 136:Watch 16:< 839:Hey 777:Done 753:Done 718:Done 580:Done 552:Done 502:Done 475:Done 443:Done 392:Done 355:Done 303:Done 274:Done 247:Done 219:Done 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 368:祝好, 798:: 606:? 599:: 203:: 173:}} 167:{{ 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 877:@ 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Bone Tomahawk
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
David Fuchs
talk
contribs
17:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
doing
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
17:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Sinoam
13:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Sinoam
14:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
MOS:QUOTEMARKS
Sinoam
15:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Sinoam

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.