Talk:Batman Forever/Archive 1

80:

comics are, an interpretation). At any rate I don't think he was any more over-the-top than Nicholson's Joker. That's not an insult, Nicholson was phenominal. But these characters are larger than life and beyond the norm. If you simply mean Jones was overacting, I refer you to Cobb or Natural Born Killers. Compared to those he's positively subdued in Batman Forever. I think there's a lot in Forever that is true to Batman and was mising from all the other three to a degree. Someone on the new DVDs made a really interesting statement. As it relates to the comics, Batman is Bob Kane's 1939 version. Batman Returns is how the characters were treated in the 90s. Batman Forever is Bill Finger's heyday in the 1940s with an intersting detective or adventure story yet larger than life props like the giant typewriters and huge pennies in the Batcave. Batman & Robin is the TV show. All are valid interpretations, it really just depends on what you like.--Talison 05:14, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

31: 848:, which requires critical commentary for every non-free image used. Here's a big hint, the DVD box is not relevant to the article. I would ditch that image, and the teaser image. Then, I'd move the Batman and Robin image to the Production section because you have a paragraph in there that discusses the changes to the Batman costume, because that's the closest thing you have to satisfying critical commentary for any other image on the page. 765:

mentioned of being said by cast and crew is responses to criticism concerning the film, which means it is relevant to the section. As for "purely online sources"...did you even look at the reference section? Sure, there are online references (which, BTW, what's this crap about "online sources not sufficient for shaping an article's content". Where exactly is that said in the good article criteria? Nowhere, that's where. In fact,

628: 609: 595: 568: 548: 525: 515: 494: 480: 466: 439: 425: 810:-- these are three films with what I believe are well-supported fair use rationales. Additionally, I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with the response from people on the set to whatever criticism took place. However, there needs to be more critical reaction for a blockbuster film -- two or three full paragraphs' worth. As for citing offline sources, I meant to say, showing 2295:

Warner should release that cut to the public so we can see the diffrences between that cut and the theatrical cut. I personally think there is no need for a special/extended/director's cut if the original theatrical cut is the cut that the director prefers. So Warner should at minimum try to figure out which of the cut Joel Schumacher prefered and go form there me thinks

905:

images can easily be found elsewhere. Knowledge strives to provide real-world context about the film, so only images relevant to that context should be included. Additionally, what I am trying to say about the Critical analysis section is that there should be more independent reviews -- you only have three major ones, and they don't really say

225:...And despite criticism, there's a degree of depth to Batman Forever that Batman and Robin clearly did not have. Several scenes were cut that would have expanded the plot and made the film seem whole instead of inconsistent to fit with the stunts and the action set peices. The only real flaw being that Tommy Lee Jones thought he was playing 702: 675: 869:

production, but the Two-Face and Riddler one looks to be fine where it is. It's in the cast section, so I don't see a problem with that. And, the critical analysis section IS 3 paragraphs long, with mentions of comments by Roger Ebert, Peter Travers, and a mention of the Rotten Tomatoes rating. And, Erik, I am fully aware of

1482:

which is not reflected here in this article. Would someone please bring over anythign that can be used, and delete anything which you can refute based on the research and info here? I don't want to randomly throw in facts from there to here and significantly throw off all the work that got this a GA,

909:

the film was good or bad. It needs to be explained if the story was too contrived, the costumes too gaudy, the dialogue too stilted, etc. It's not just opinion of whether the film was enjoyable, but specific reasons why the film caused that opinion. I would be happy to help provide offline sources

904:

was designed a specific way, a picture of it would complement the description. Another example would be explaining the makeup process of Two-Face and having a picture of Tommy Lee Jones as the villain. I know that the attempt is to show images of the heroes and the villains from the film, but these

2315:

I'd like to see this get back to GA status. But I tried to provide more citations for the awards section and it seemed nigh-impossible to cite anything that's not IMDB (IMDB seems to be the only place that keeps track of these awards). Anyone know a better way of verifying these things? Also checked

2274:

It is an interesting list but was not well sourced, and it made that section disproportionately long. It might be worthwhile to reorganize and reinclude some of those details in other ways. For example, rather than focusing on the deleted scenes it could be mentioned that Rene Auberjonois originally

899:

DVD cover. Non-free images need to have a specific purpose in the article, which means we can't pick an image and say, "I believe this helps show so-and-so in the film." There's no limit to that approach. Images need to be chosen to complement existing content in the article. For example, if the

764:

I don't see a problem with the fair-use rationales for any of the pictures, except for maybe the teaser poster. Having pictures that show the heroes and villians is pretty standard. The critical analysis section has the first two paragraphs talking about reviewers's thoughts on the film, and what is

708:

I think you should see for yourself. I wrote it in the same format/style that you wrote in Road to Perdition#Reception. The reason why I included quotes from Schumacher were because of his reaction towards the reviews, so to speak. Now, I'm just trying my best to find those articles you listed. They

178:

Batman Forever has been regarded by some as a homoerotic movie after a conservative columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times, Gary Willis, (not a movie reviewer) sardonically bashed the movie's campiness and perceived homoerotic motifs ("Batman Forever is a Gay Old Time," Chicago Sun-Times, 1995). Though

89:

It says early in the article that "Originally it was intended that the third Batman film would be directed by Burton... When Burton was attached by the studio to the Superman film..." Later, in the Trivia section, it says that, "Director Tim Burton intended to direct the third film in the franchise,

2294:

All of these sequences are probably all related to the Schumacher cut of the movie, which was confirmed to exist in the summer, by Varity afer Schumacher'S death. So these could be mentioned in relation to those. But far as i'm conerned if the Joel Schumacher perfered the darker Schumacher Cut then

769:

is a featured article and has no offline cites. Do you think it shouldn't be considered an FA? A reference is a reference, no matter where it comes from, as long as it's verifiable), but there's also stuff from the DVD's, from the Chicago Sun-Times, and from Entertainment Weekly, which is an online

357:

Removed POV: "Still, to this day, Jim Carrey is the most recognizable, as well as the most beloved, actors to portray the green suited villain. While most comic book fans will judge his performace as more "Joker-like" in nature, non-fanboys enjoyed Carrey's comedic, yet villainous, portrayal of the

1871:

I've added Bill Finger to the infobox under the "based on" section along with Bob Kane. As I've stated on the other Batman film pages, Finger is now an acknowledged co-creator of Batman. I think it's important to add this to each page since it keeps the pages as factual as possible - without this

79:

It really amazes me when people insult Tommy Lee Jones performance as over-the-top. I really liked how he was calm and cool as Dent yet just psychotic as Two-Face. It may not be exactly what is in the comics, but it is certainly a valid interpretation (and really that's what all movie versions of

1567:

I've just done a date audit and discovered that the monobook script is suddenly removing such links. I've checked with the programmer. In fact, I think WikiProject film might already deprecate such links. Please let me know if you want me to revert (or are reverting yourselves—feedback would be

274:

This article has pov issues. The reaction area reads liike one persons opinion: Kilmers wooden performance, criticism of Joel, cartoonish acts by Jim and Tommy, criticism of gadgets etc etc. Though many of these opinions are most likely true, it needs to be referenced properly. The plot needs a

868:

Plot section looks fine to me. I can try to trim it down, but keeping plot sections short for movies is no easy task. The DVD box is there because the article mentions that it came out on DVD with the 3 other Batman films in a special anthology edition. I'll move the Batman and Robin one up to

74:

Tommy Lee Jones is a great actor. There was no excuse for him to ham it up so over-the-top in this; however, I believe it was direction. The next Batman movie was even worse. Something should be said on this page and the one for the Clooney Batman that the production team (including writers,

2097:

with a trivial list of deleted scenes only just recently having been removed). I considered reverting this back to the 2007 revision, but looking over it, I'm not convinced it would pass modern GA criteria. The plot synopsis and bolded cast list doesn't even pass the current manual of style.

995:

is clear that if you are going to include any non-free images, especially box art for DVDs, you need critical commentary on that image. That would mean you would need critical commentary on the box art for that DVD set, because simply saying "the movie came out in a box set" is not critical

1942:. He comments about Kilmer "I said he was pyschotic", and says that Tommy Lee Jones was difficult but always delivered good takes. He says "I shouldn't have made a sequel" and explains his reasoning, and also makes his opinions clear "Nor do I ever think Batman and Robin are gay." 93:

The first quote makes it seem that Burton became attached to another movie and was unable to direct, but the latter quote says he refused it. Are they both true? Maybe the first should be changed to say that Burton refused the role as director or that was not to work on the project.

944:

It's alright. :) I'm hoping to retrieve some information for Wildroot, but not everything may be available online. I'm on break now, but when I get back to the university, I can access the stacks for some more out-of-reach information. Right now, though, I'm working on expanding

199:

Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?

770:

source, but it also appeared in the actual magazine. It's just easier to get it from the website then to try to find the actual magazine. You don't like how he reviewed it? Fine. I've been an editor here much longer than he has and I agree with the review; are you saying that

794:. This would mean there needs to be content directly commenting on the specific screenshot or something in the screenshot. While it may be "pretty standard" to decorate images with the look of a film's characters, it does not add anything significant to the article per 2036:

This has been open for around three weeks, with multiple top editors and at least two Wikiprojects tagged. Unfortunately, no one has made an effort to address these concerns or improve the article to an extent that would lead to it passing a GA review. Closing as

1848:

The url is not random as it talks about Michael Keaton walking away from the Batman Franchise to his reason not being in Batman Forever. You should read the information in the url. It appears the information has been updated on the Batman Forever page by someone.

1536:

list of the highest grossing Batman films as of 2008 1. The Dark Knight (2008) 2. Batman (1989) 3. Batman Begins (2005) 4. Batman Forever (1995) 5. Batman Returns (1992) 6. Batman and Robin (1997) 7. Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1994)

996:

commentary, and not enough to justify the fair-use of that non-free image. This image is on each of the film pages. It's unnecessary for all the articles. It's pure eye-candy. I don't understand the home video release of any of those films

251:

Why is that notice about the plot being "overly long" still up? I don't really think this plot summary is longer than usual, is it? There are certainly some plot summaries out there that are quite a bit more overboard than this one.

1902:

Throughout the article Meridian is referred to alternately as a 'psychologist' and 'psychiatrist'. These are two distinct things - but I can't find a definitive source on it outside .fandom wikis (which are similarly inconsistent).

709:

are of course hard to find, but I did purchase two magazines off EBAY with a total of three dollars each. They were original published material specifically from Warner Brothers. I'm going to see what I can dig up, catch you later.

1185:

Interview with producer Peter MacGregor-Scott about the making of BATMAN FOREVER: on the casting and the characters in the film and about his films before BATMAN FOREVER; and interview with Chris O'Donnell about the characters he

336:

The text pretty much assumes that the UK Region 2 DVD is the only R2 release, there are many others. Also, only the UK release was previously cut, while all other R2 releases (both original and special edition) were/are uncut

873:. However, I would argue that Wildroot has done considerable work on the article, and he is a large reason of the push to GA, and he is the only one known of actively trying to improve the article; hence why I addressed him. 1290:

Description of the methods used to achieve the special effects on Joel Schumacher's BATMAN FOREVER, for example the creation of Gotham City, the bat-signal, digital rendering of some Batman sequences, creation of the Bat

691:

The "Critical analysis" section barely has any reviewers talking about the film. A lot of the content is from people involved with the film itself. It would be appropriate to have more independent perspectives -- see

1072:

Several articles about BATMAN & ROBIN and the Batman films: interviews with George Clooney, Joel Schumacher, Arnold Schwarzenegger *and Michael Gough, features on BATMAN FOREVER BATMAN RETURNS, BATMAN and the 1966

1502:

It says in this article that Batman Forever is the 4th highest grossing Batman film to date. Under the Batman Returns article, it says that Batman Returns is the 4th highest grossing Batman film to date. Which is

1532:

list of the highest grossing Batman films as of 2007 1. Batman (1989) 2. Batman Begins (2005) 3. Batman Forever (1995) 4. Batman Returns (1992) 5. Batman and Robin (1997) 6. Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1994)

2279:, or the comic adaptation, both of which include various deleted scenes, so again there may be other ways to add more details and improve this article, other than making Deleted scenes section extremely long. -- 1872:

note in the infobox there is little or no reference to Finger as the co-creator, while some mention of Kane's contribution is still present. I've noted that Finger's contribution was uncredited at the time.

1171:

Review of a copyright dispute between Warner Bros. and sculptor Andrew Leicester over the alleged use of a copy of a work on public display, called Zanga Madre, which appeared as Gotham City in BATMAN FOREVER.

1651:

The Movie is ambiguous as to the fate of Sugar and Spice-it only shows them running away on stairs under the platform after Nigma's carrier beam is destroyed. Was it planned that way in the original script?

1157:

Article about the special effects in BATMAN FOREVER: the co- ordination of shooting and post-production, miniature sets for Gotham city, the Batmobile model, the animatronic bat, the characters in the film

1228:

Report from the press screenings and conferences for BATMAN FOREVER, with an interview with Val Kilmer, a look at the work of production designer Barbara Ling, and a report on the internet site.

930:

Okay, now it makes more sense. I apologize if I have come across as a jerk. Looking back at some of the things I've said, I definitely seemed to have let things get out of control on my end.

1678:

Weren't the external scenes of "Wayne Mansion" shot at Webb Institute in Glen Cove, NY? The Knowledge entries for other Batman movies include information about where they were filmed. See

179:

not defending the film's cinematic merits, most view this analysis a groundless throwback to similar homophobic criticisms of the early years of the comic books and the 1960's TV series.

121:

Any sources to back up the proposed Burton production with Russo, Wayans, and a possible return of Catwoman? Never heard of this until this page, never been able to find it since.

1333:

Michael Gough has played butler Alfred Pennyworth in all the recent BATMAN movies and he explains how he sees his role and how it has changed with different directors and cast.

1725:

After Bruce takes Dick into his home, he has a flashback to the murder of his parents. Is that footage reused from an earlier movie (maybe an alternate angle?), or is it new?

2275:

had a larger role, or expanding the background of other characters. Maybe more could be written about the script development. This article does not mention the film

266:

In the plot summary, it says "Batman then rescues the hostages and foils the robbery but is unable to foil the robbery." Does this sentence make sense to anyone??

887:

Including a non-free image of the anthology set only serves to identify the said set -- with that approach, it would be appropriate to include a gallery of every

2333:, I'd be very surprised if none of those could be reused. It takes some digging but IMDB gets most of its information from press releases in the first place. -- 1087:

Director Joel Schumacher talks about casting differences with author John Grisham for A TIME TO KILL and about the casting of the lead roles in his BATMAN films.

1276:

Article on the visual style of Joel Schumacher's BATMAN FOREVER, looks at the use of the original comics, the type of film stock used and filming techniques. .

1630:

Summarizing might be good, but surely we would lose information in doing that? The list I posted is not the complete list, just the most important changes.

1945:

It's a long interview which covers many topics including Batman but there's probably some of that interview that could be referenced in this article. --

1377:

Article on the use of 'motion capture' on BATMAN FOREVER - a technique whereby an actor's features are scanned and combined with a skeletal 'body map'.

776:

would have made a mistake in passing it? Wildroot, don't feel threatened that the article may lose its GA status. I think the article is worthy of GA.

665:

I was concerned to see that an editor who has only been editing since November 3, 2007 passed this as a Good Article. These are the following issues:

1918:

I have corrected the instance of "psychiatrist" to "psychologist" because the latter appears much more often in this article and in other material.

1247:

A report from a press viewing of Joel Schumacher's BATMAN FOREVER with interviews with the Schumacher, Val Kilmer, Tommy Lee Jones, and Jim Carrey.

1887: 2093:. Right now, the article has substantial cruft issues, citing issues, and unaddressed section templeting (these problems have actually existed 1747: 1363:

Interview with Val Kilmer, Jim Carrey, Tommy Lee Jones, Nicole Kidman, Chris O'Donnell, Barbara Ling and Joel Schumacher about BATMAN FOREVER.

2237: 1552: 2206: 2110: 2053: 2002: 1704: 1682: 322:

all have the movie posters in the infobox, whereas this one has the DVD cover. Can somebody please upload a movie poster for this one too?

2334: 1946: 129:

I removed uncited, unsourced, unverifiable comments in relation to Batman Forever being a failure, as we need some statistics or other

2280: 1659: 818:

is easier, but online sources are not always comprehensive, as my subpage shows. Also, I would inform you that this article does not

403: 397: 377: 1143:

Jim Carrey talks about his role as The Riddler in BATMAN FOREVER and especially his scenes with Tommy Lee Jones who played Two-Face.

175:

This resulted making the third Batman movie with a feel that was more reminiscent to the 1960s TV show than its Burton predecessors

150:

Failure??, hell no, it was probably the most successful Batman movie since Batman 1 (but maybe not as successful as the recent one).

723:

for many sources that should be used in the article. Even Good Articles require some research beyond what's accessible via Google.

1447:

Warner Brothers are not using Tim Burton to direct BATMAN 3, but he will be executive producer and may direct a Catwoman spin-off.

2327: 587: 826:. I am only expressing concerns because I believe that this article can progress further before reaching Good Article status. — 1058:

Interview with Barbara Ling and John Dykstra about the special effects in BATMAN & ROBIN and comparison of the Batman films

139: 1595:. Plus, and this is just me, I'm sometimes curious what other films came out that year and the link is a nice thing to have. 1464: 754: 486: 1319:

Profile of Pat Hingle who plays Commissioner Gordon in BATMAN FOREVER and who has a screen career stretching over 40 years.

318: 2123: 1805: 1883: 162:

This section seems to be a POV fork, Characterizing opinions of people's work. The lines which seem to be biased are:

1615:

I appreciate the info, but we seriously need to find some other way to summarize this whole thing. Any suggestions?

1129:

On the various merchandising products available for recent Hollywood films, such as BATMAN, CONGO, JUDGE DREDD etc.

964: 919: 835: 736: 38: 1548: 431: 75:

directors and ACTORS) did not take these two movies seriously and aggregiously wounded the Batman idea. Tom S.

2330: 2201: 2105: 2048: 1997: 1775: 1708: 650:

Bah, you beat me to it, Evil. It is a very solid article Wildroot, most definitely deserving the status of GA.

1686: 1214:

Interview with Chris O'Donnell about his upbringing and his career, acting and playing Robin in BATMAN FOREVER

1031: 811: 720: 2338: 844:

The plot section is overly long; as Erik has pointed out, every image other than the one in the infobox fail

2284: 2077: 1987: 1950: 452: 1044:

A discussion of the problems of adapting comic books for film, focussing on the BATMAN films amongst others

814:

in the process, that there was more information available offline. It's great to use online sources since

301:

film that one sucked and the batman films before this were worse! But This film was a genuine work of art.

2073: 1879: 1762: 1663: 1635: 1455:

page. As soon as Erik lets me read these (which he promised he would), then I will get down to business. —

220: 341: 1969: 1837: 183:

I suggest that this be removed...Much of the negativity came from the drastic makeover of the franchise

1964:

Horrible language throughout. Anyone care to clean it up? My suggestions and edits tend to get reverted

1939: 669:

Non-free images in the article besides the identifying poster image lack sufficient fair use rationale.

1981: 1965: 1115:

The reasons why forty minutes of footage failed to make the final cut in BATMAN FOREVER are explained.

2300: 2149: 2137: 1875: 1854: 1850: 1827: 1815: 1811: 1655: 1544: 1540: 1508: 807: 236:

Damn you and your mother for dissing Tommy. He was the master of light and dark, and made The Joker

169:

earned less than the original, Warner Bros. insisted the movie be made into a kid-friendly cash cow.

2219: 2196: 2100: 2043: 1992: 1600: 935: 878: 781: 253: 47: 17: 1433:

Article on BATMAN FOREVER (a.k.a. BATMAN III); statements by director Tim Burton on the production

2233: 2129: 2028: 1791: 1730: 1620: 1460: 750: 745:

I've tried my best to find and read those articles you listed but I just simply don't know how. —

359: 306: 188: 116: 1504: 790:

Unfortunately, non-free images need to be supported with critical commentary -- take a look at

2179: 2153: 1631: 1488: 1287:

American Cinematographer (0002-7928) v.76 n.7 , July 1995, p.45-48,50,52,54-55, English, illus

1010: 858: 803: 799: 693: 641: 323: 170: 2224:

Unfortunately, Wx5uuh and Filmcritik are long gone at this point. I've already notified the

2169: 1833: 577: 298: 2316:

the FILM MOS and was unsure how the plot summary/cast list didn't follow its instructions.

719:

Purely online sources are not sufficient for shaping an article's content. Take a look at

248:

I dont think it's necessary to write everything that happens in the movie in this section.

2296: 2173: 1923: 1908: 1576: 947: 2317: 2225: 2187: 2145: 1596: 1452: 960: 931: 915: 874: 831: 777: 732: 651: 534: 312: 226: 134: 2228:

project as well as the Batman and Comic book film task forces about the reassessment.

2229: 2161: 2141: 2018: 1806:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michael-keaton-batman_us_586ca422e4b0eb58648b33d9

1787: 1726: 1616: 1456: 1273:

American Cinematographer (0002-7928) v.76 n.7 , July 1995, p.34-42,44, English, illus

870: 823: 819: 795: 791: 746: 710: 682: 637: 601: 382: 112: 2342: 2320: 2304: 2288: 2241: 2212: 2116: 2086: 2059: 2008: 1973: 1954: 1927: 1912: 1891: 1858: 1841: 1819: 1795: 1734: 1712: 1690: 1667: 1639: 1624: 1604: 1581: 1556: 1512: 1492: 1468: 1015: 968: 939: 923: 882: 863: 839: 785: 758: 740: 713: 685: 654: 644: 385: 362: 344: 338: 326: 279: 256: 191: 144: 101: 2191: 2133: 1752: 1588: 1484: 1001: 992: 849: 845: 472: 2080:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment. 375:: If you have not contributed significantly to this article, please review it at 2157: 1479: 1451:

I will be checking off each one after reading it and publishing new info on the

815: 276: 205: 130: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2326:

Keep looking. Here is an announcement of the 1996 MTV Movie Awards nominations

1200:

Interview with Lee and Janet Scott Batchler about the script for BATMAN FOREVER

1168:

International Media Law (0263 6395) v.13 n.9 , September 1995, p.67-68, English

185:(most of it led by Joel Schumacher at the will of the Warner Bros. executives). 1919: 1904: 1569: 1041:

Cinefantastique (0145-6032) v.29 n.10 , February 1998, p.32-35, English, illus

1430:

Cinefantastique (0145-6032) v.25 n.1 , February 1994, p.64-68, English, illus

1123:

TIRARD, Laurent: Noël made in Hollywood: La folie du marketing atteint des so

2183: 1027: 956: 911: 827: 728: 98: 1346:

Cinefantastique (0145-6032) v.26 n.4 , June 1995, p.4-5, 61, English, illus

1211:

StarBurst (0955-114X) v.Star n.Trek , August 1995, p.36-39, English, illus

1069:

Film Review (0957-1809) v.Spec n.No.20 , July 1997, p.4-47, English, illus

2165: 1419:

Jim Carrey has been signed to play The Riddler, replacing Robin Williams.

1416:

Screen International (0307-4617) n.959 , 27 May 1994, p.2, English, illus

766: 133:

information to back this claim up. Feel free to add some if you have it.

1126:

Studio Magazine (0982-8354) n.103 , October 1995, p.36,37, French, illus

275:

massive rewrite as well, it is huge, the whole article is 33 kilobytes.

2268:

An anonymous editor added a long list of deleted scenes to the article.

1521:

is currently the fourth highest grossing Batman film to date. Remember

1052:

PERENSON, Melissa J.; NEWMAN, Kim: Designing Gotham / Batman redundant

1026:

Greetings for anyone wondering what this is, it's a list as seen from

701: 674: 240:

in comparison. "Emotion's always the enemy of true justice"- Two Face

221:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ateQQc-AgEM&search=Batman%20Forever

1391:

Article on the personnel changes on the production of BATMAN FOREVER.

1832:

Did you have any comment or recommendation other than a random URL?

1483:

but there's abotu zero apparent overlap between the two articles.

1197:

StarBurst (0955-114X) n.204 , August 1995, p.39-42, English, illus

1101:

Interview with designer Barbara Ling on the sets of BATMAN FOREVER

1055:

StarBurst (0955-114X) n.228 , August 1997, p.20-25, English, illus

2027:

Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at

1587:

I'd say have the links in there. Considering this is a '95 film,

1388:

Sight and Sound (0037-4806) v.4 n.10 , October 1994, p.4, English

1182:

StarBurst (0955-114X) n.204 , August 1995, p.8-14, English, illus

1098:

StarBurst (0955-114X) , 31 December 1995, p.22-24, English, illus

951:

for this weekend. I'll see if I can help out with resources for

1679: 1592: 1360:

Premiere (0894-9263) v.8 n.9 , May 1995, p.52-59, English, illus

1305:

Joel Schumacher explains why he wanted to direct BATMAN FOREVER.

1259:

Film-Echo/Filmwoche n.29 , 21 July 1995, p.9-11, German, illus

1179:

JANKIEWICZ, Pat: Peter MacGregor-Scott declares Batman Forever

25: 987:

It doesn't matter that the film came out in a box set, that

910:

with the article, and I've extended the offer to Wildroot. —

1270:

PIZZELLO, Stephen: Batman Forever mines comic-book origins

2178:

Other pertinent editors include the original GA reviewer

1405:

Note on Michael Keaton's reasons for leaving the project.

2269: 2094: 2090: 1330:

Starlog n.215 , June 1995, p.50-53, 72, English, illus

1225:

Premiere v.3 n.7 , August 1995, p.46-54, English, illus

1154:

Cinefex n.63 , September 1995, p.90-113, English, illus

1140:

Starlog n.218 , September 1995, p.27-30, English, illus

1701:

It would appear that someone has been trolling there.

1316:

Starlog n.216 , July 1995, p.46-49, 63, English, illus

681:

I'll get to work on the other two improvements later.

1242:

Empire n.74 , August 1995, p.108-117, English, illus

1084:

Empire n.88 , October 1996, p.62-64, English, illus

1302:Starlog n.216 , July 1995, p.40-45, English, illus 1234:*NATHAN, Ian: Hold me, thrill me, kiss me, Kilmer 2251:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 1717:How is 77 percent more balanced than 44 percent? 1444:Empire n.54 , December 1993, p.14, English, illus 1374:Empire n.65 , November 1994, p.11, English, illus 1284:MAGID, Ron: Effects help to expand Batman's world 1112:Empire n.77 , November 1995, p.54, English, illus 339:http://dvdcompare.net/comparisons/film.php?fid=41 90:but turned it down due to creative differences." 2031:. No further edits should be made to this page. 1066:BRETT, Anwar; JONES, Matthew;: Batman and Robin 197: 2257:No further edits should be made to this page. 2017:The following is an archived discussion of a 154:I think Schumacher dropped the ball big time 8: 1529:from the fourth to the fifth. See below. 1262:On the premiere of BATMAN FOREVER in Hamburg 727:Hopefully, these improvements can be made. — 586:(images are tagged and non-free images have 1402:Empire n.63 , September 1994, p.14, English 2089:, but now bares only a modest resemblance 1873: 640:. I'm looking forward to you future work. 1478:There's a fair amount of information at 1413:HAZELTON, John: Carrey set to vex Batman 378:Knowledge:Good article nominations#Media 2182:, the original GA reassessor from 2007 1680:http://en.wikipedia.org/Webb_Institute 1095:MCILHONEY, Lawrence: Designing Forever 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2126:, tagging the article's top editors: 2085:The article first passed a GA review 1371:Front desk news: dead clever, that... 1349:Looks at the making of BATMAN FOREVER 1081:NATHAN, Ian: Nothing but the truth... 158:Critical reaction and box office Bias 7: 2329:There are references in the article 1357:BIBBY, Bruce: Riddle Me This, Batman 373:ATTENTION TO ALL EXPERIENCED EDITORS 2311:Awards verification/other GAN stuff 1222:NAUGHTON, John: 'We Have a Problem' 1194:JANKIEWICZ, Pat: Batcherls forever 581:, where possible and appropriate. 24: 1343:BIODROWSKI, Steve: Batman Forever 1151:VAZ, Mark Cotta: Forever a knight 1763:"Dark Knight Becomes 'Bat' Lite" 1299:SHAPIRO, Marc: Knightmare master 1000:when I look at the DVD box set. 700: 673: 626: 607: 593: 566: 546: 543:Fair representation without bias 523: 513: 492: 478: 464: 437: 423: 233:of what made Harvey who he was. 187:...unless a source is provided. 29: 1776:"Rental champs: Rate of return" 2122:As a courtesy, and going from 2091:to that version of the article 1761:Busch, Anita M (May 1, 1995). 1605:04:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1582:03:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1165:WILLIAMS, ALan: Batman forever 289:Image:Batman_forever_ver7.jpg 280:02:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 216:My Power, My Pleasure, My PAIN 70:Worst Batman Run since the 60s 1: 2305:01:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC) 2289:09:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC) 2242:05:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 2060:00:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC) 1625:06:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 1591:is a better link than simply 1557:18:16, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 1469:18:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1327:WARREN, Bill: Batman's batman 1208:GRAY, Marianne: Robin forever 1137:MURRAY, Will: Riddler forever 1016:05:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 969:06:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 940:17:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 924:17:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 883:15:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 864:05:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 840:05:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 786:02:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 759:18:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 741:20:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 714:11:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 686:11:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 655:18:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 645:13:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 386:12:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 345:12:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 327:07:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC) 2213:19:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC) 2117:02:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC) 2009:02:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC) 1928:05:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC) 1892:19:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 1859:00:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC) 1796:17:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC) 1735:22:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 1668:17:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 1493:14:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC) 1427:ALTMAN, Mark A.: Dark Knight 627: 608: 594: 567: 547: 524: 514: 493: 479: 465: 438: 424: 192:04:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 2321:18:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC) 1955:15:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 1940:interviewed Joel Schumacher 1842:03:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC) 1820:03:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC) 1774:Staff (December 15, 1997). 1746:Staff (November 24, 1993). 1640:06:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 1313:WEAVER,Tom: Gotham's finest 1022:Magazine Published Articles 694:Road to Perdition#Reception 145:11:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 85:Tim Burton Inconsistencies? 2359: 2186:, and active participants 1867:Bill Finger Creator Credit 1691:02:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1513:03:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 363:03:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 2343:17:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 2019:Good Article reassessment 1974:08:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC) 1913:15:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC) 1697:Critical reaction Section 661:Good Article Reassessment 257:09:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 102:03:44, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 2331:53rd Golden Globe Awards 2254:Please do not modify it. 2024:Please do not modify it. 1748:"Robin Williams Studies" 1713:12:54, 4 June 2011 (UTC) 1517:Well, Vesus as of 2008, 1474:Gotham City article info 1399:Front desk in production 1038:EVANS, David: Caped Fear 1034:page. The list follows: 1032:User:Erik/Batman Forever 812:User:Erik/Batman Forever 792:WP:NFC#Acceptable images 721:User:Erik/Batman Forever 2078:Talk:Batman Forever/GA1 1988:Talk:Batman Forever/GA1 413:reasonably well written 293:Best Batman Of Them All 115:could play E.NIGMA aka 1960:this article is a mess 1525:, and it knocked down 600:(appropriate use with 202: 1898:Psychiatry/psychology 991:critical commentary. 575:It is illustrated by 535:neutral point of view 503:broad in its coverage 165:Due to the fact that 42:of past discussions. 2271:This was reverted. 1647:Sugar and Spice fate 1109:NATHAN, Ian: Q&A 895:VHS cover and every 808:Sunshine (2007 film) 368:Good Article Nominee 297:I hated that stupid 2124:the page statistics 2072:This discussion is 696:for such a section. 588:fair use rationales 332:Home Video releases 18:Talk:Batman Forever 2029:Knowledge talk:GAR 1611:The "original cut" 1563:year in film links 1498:Box office grosses 798:. Take a look at 448:factually accurate 319:Batman & Robin 1894: 1880:Friendly Lobotomy 1878:comment added by 1740:References to use 1658:comment added by 1559: 1543:comment added by 1013: 1008: 891:poster and every 861: 856: 804:Road to Perdition 800:Fight Club (film) 602:suitable captions 563:No edit wars etc. 358:famous Bat-Foe." 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2350: 2256: 2223: 2209: 2204: 2199: 2177: 2113: 2108: 2103: 2056: 2051: 2046: 2026: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1985: 1831: 1783: 1770: 1757: 1674:Filming location 1670: 1579: 1574: 1538: 1011: 1006: 1002: 859: 854: 850: 704: 677: 630: 629: 611: 610: 597: 596: 570: 569: 550: 549: 527: 526: 517: 516: 496: 495: 482: 481: 473:reliable sources 468: 467: 441: 440: 427: 426: 299:Batman and Robin 208: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2313: 2266: 2261: 2252: 2217: 2207: 2202: 2197: 2138:SheriffIsInTown 2127: 2111: 2106: 2101: 2068: 2066:GA Reassessment 2054: 2049: 2044: 2022: 2003: 1998: 1993: 1979: 1962: 1936: 1900: 1869: 1825: 1803: 1773: 1760: 1745: 1742: 1723: 1721:Reused footage? 1715: 1699: 1676: 1653: 1649: 1613: 1577: 1570: 1565: 1545:Christianster45 1523:The Dark Knight 1500: 1476: 1024: 1004: 852: 663: 532:It follows the 510:(major aspects) 393: 370: 355: 334: 295: 287: 272: 264: 246: 218: 210: 204: 160: 142: 127: 109: 87: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2356: 2354: 2346: 2345: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2265: 2264:Deleted scenes 2262: 2260: 2259: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2220:Darkknight2149 2083: 2082: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2034: 2033: 2013: 2012: 2011: 1961: 1958: 1935: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1899: 1896: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1847: 1845: 1844: 1810: 1802: 1801:Michael Keaton 1799: 1785: 1784: 1771: 1758: 1741: 1738: 1722: 1719: 1705:218.186.18.233 1703: 1698: 1695: 1683:96.255.105.148 1675: 1672: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1612: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1564: 1561: 1527:Batman Returns 1519:Batman Forever 1499: 1496: 1475: 1472: 1449: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1435: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1400: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1372: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1351: 1350: 1347: 1344: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1328: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1285: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1257: 1250: 1249: 1243: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1223: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1124: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1046: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1023: 1020: 1019: 1018: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 953:Batman Forever 902:Batman Forever 897:Batman Forever 893:Batman Forever 889:Batman Forever 725: 724: 698: 697: 671: 670: 662: 659: 658: 657: 634: 633: 632: 631: 614: 613: 612: 573: 572: 571: 553: 552: 551: 530: 529: 528: 499: 498: 497: 471:(citations to 444: 443: 442: 408: 407: 392: 389: 369: 366: 354: 351: 349: 342:62.142.194.228 333: 330: 313:Batman Returns 304: 294: 291: 286: 283: 271: 268: 263: 260: 254:Chalkieperfect 245: 242: 229:and displayed 217: 214: 212: 196: 195: 194: 167:Batman Returns 159: 156: 152: 151: 138: 126: 123: 108: 105: 86: 83: 82: 81: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2355: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2335:109.76.202.85 2332: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2319: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2272: 2270: 2263: 2258: 2255: 2249: 2248: 2243: 2239: 2238:contributions 2235: 2231: 2230:Lord Sjones23 2227: 2221: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2205: 2200: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2125: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2115: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2062: 2061: 2058: 2057: 2052: 2047: 2040: 2032: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2006: 2001: 1996: 1989: 1983: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1959: 1957: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1947:109.76.195.16 1943: 1941: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1897: 1895: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1829: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1808: 1807: 1800: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1781: 1777: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1749: 1744: 1743: 1739: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1720: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1696: 1694: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1681: 1673: 1671: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1646: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1575: 1573: 1562: 1560: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1534: 1530: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1497: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1481: 1473: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1332: 1331: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1261: 1258: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1235: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1021: 1017: 1014: 1009: 1007: 999: 994: 990: 986: 970: 966: 962: 958: 954: 950: 949: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 921: 917: 913: 908: 903: 900:Batmobile in 898: 894: 890: 886: 885: 884: 880: 876: 872: 867: 866: 865: 862: 857: 855: 847: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816:verifiability 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 796:WP:NFC#Policy 793: 789: 788: 787: 783: 779: 775: 774: 768: 763: 762: 761: 760: 756: 752: 748: 743: 742: 738: 734: 730: 722: 718: 717: 716: 715: 712: 707: 703: 695: 690: 689: 688: 687: 684: 680: 676: 668: 667: 666: 660: 656: 653: 649: 648: 647: 646: 643: 639: 624: 621: 620: 618: 615: 605: 603: 591: 589: 583: 582: 580: 579: 574: 564: 561: 560: 558: 554: 544: 541: 540: 538: 536: 531: 521: 511: 507: 506: 504: 500: 490: 488: 476: 474: 462: 458: 457: 455: 454: 449: 445: 435: 433: 421: 417: 416: 414: 410: 409: 406:for criteria) 405: 401: 399: 395: 394: 390: 388: 387: 384: 380: 379: 374: 367: 365: 364: 361: 360:Smylere Snape 352: 350: 347: 346: 343: 340: 331: 329: 328: 325: 321: 320: 315: 314: 309: 308: 302: 300: 292: 290: 284: 282: 281: 278: 269: 267: 261: 259: 258: 255: 249: 243: 241: 239: 234: 232: 228: 223: 222: 215: 213: 209: 207: 201: 193: 190: 189:Forever young 186: 182: 181: 180: 176: 173: 172: 168: 163: 157: 155: 149: 148: 147: 146: 141: 136: 132: 124: 122: 119: 118: 114: 113:Frank Gorshin 106: 104: 103: 100: 95: 91: 84: 78: 77: 76: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2314: 2281:109.79.72.89 2277:novelization 2276: 2273: 2267: 2253: 2250: 2195: 2180:Evildeadbuzz 2154:JesusFreak89 2099: 2087:back in 2007 2084: 2071: 2042: 2038: 2035: 2023: 2016: 1991: 1963: 1944: 1938:Vulture.com 1937: 1901: 1874:— Preceding 1870: 1862: 1846: 1809: 1804: 1786: 1779: 1766: 1753:Sun-Sentinel 1751: 1724: 1716: 1700: 1677: 1660:74.83.126.88 1650: 1642:JesusFreak89 1632:JesusFreak89 1614: 1589:1995 in film 1571: 1566: 1535: 1531: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1501: 1477: 1453:main article 1450: 1441:The Lost Boy 1436: 1422: 1408: 1394: 1385:The business 1380: 1366: 1352: 1338: 1322: 1308: 1294: 1279: 1265: 1251: 1246: 1240: 1237: 1233: 1231: 1217: 1203: 1189: 1174: 1160: 1146: 1132: 1118: 1104: 1090: 1076: 1061: 1047: 1025: 1012:(Contact me) 1003: 997: 988: 952: 946: 906: 901: 896: 892: 888: 860:(Contact me) 851: 772: 771: 744: 726: 705: 699: 678: 672: 664: 642:Evildeadbuzz 635: 622: 616: 599: 585: 576: 562: 556: 542: 533: 519: 509: 502: 484: 470: 461:(references) 460: 451: 447: 429: 419: 412: 396: 376: 372: 371: 356: 348: 335: 324:Osaboramirez 317: 311: 305: 303: 296: 288: 273: 265: 250: 247: 237: 235: 230: 224: 219: 211: 203: 198: 184: 177: 174: 166: 164: 161: 153: 128: 120: 110: 96: 92: 88: 73: 60: 43: 37: 2170:NeoBatfreak 2074:transcluded 1982:Robbmonster 1966:Robbmonster 1834:Cyphoidbomb 1654:—Preceding 1539:—Preceding 1480:Gotham City 955:tomorrow. — 117:THE RIDDLER 36:This is an 2297:DoctorHver 2174:Gothicfilm 2150:Filmcritik 1934:Schumacher 1851:Majinsnake 1828:Majinsnake 1812:Majinsnake 636:Great job 453:verifiable 262:Repetative 131:verifiable 2318:Etzedek24 2188:Anakinjmt 2146:CovenantD 2095:for years 1597:Anakinjmt 932:Anakinjmt 875:Anakinjmt 778:Anakinjmt 652:Anakinjmt 623:Pass/Fail 520:(focused) 238:laughable 227:The Joker 135:Werdna648 61:Archive 1 2162:Sjones23 2142:Wildroot 1888:contribs 1876:unsigned 1788:Wildroot 1656:unsigned 1617:Wildroot 1553:contribs 1541:unsigned 1457:Wildroot 1256:Premiere 1005:BIGNOLE 948:The Mist 853:BIGNOLE 824:Wildroot 767:GameFAQs 751:Wildroot 747:Wildroot 711:Wildroot 683:Wildroot 638:Wildroot 383:Wildroot 125:Failure? 2226:WP:FILM 2192:Bignole 2172:, and 2134:TMC1982 2039:Demoted 1780:Variety 1767:Variety 1568:good). 1485:ThuranX 1465:contrib 965:contrib 920:contrib 836:contrib 755:contrib 737:contrib 617:Overall 420:(prose) 231:nothing 107:Remarks 39:archive 2203:knight 2158:J Greb 2130:Wx5uuh 2107:knight 2050:knight 1999:knight 1578:(talk) 1073:Batman 998:better 989:is not 871:WP:OWN 820:belong 806:, and 578:images 557:stable 555:It is 537:policy 501:It is 446:It is 411:It is 400:review 391:Review 316:, and 307:Batman 277:Davey4 206:Wetman 2076:from 1920:ADEps 1905:ADEps 1727:Allen 1693:Dane 1505:Vesus 1186:plays 993:WP:FU 846:WP:FU 402:(see 285:Image 111:Only 16:< 2339:talk 2301:talk 2285:talk 2234:talk 2208:2149 2198:Dark 2190:and 2184:Erik 2112:2149 2102:Dark 2055:2149 2045:Dark 2004:2149 1994:Dark 1986:See 1970:talk 1951:talk 1924:talk 1909:talk 1884:talk 1855:talk 1838:talk 1816:talk 1792:talk 1731:talk 1709:talk 1687:talk 1664:talk 1636:talk 1621:talk 1601:talk 1593:1995 1572:Tony 1549:talk 1509:talk 1489:talk 1467:) - 1461:talk 1291:Cave 1028:Erik 967:) - 961:talk 957:Erik 936:talk 922:) - 916:talk 912:Erik 879:talk 838:) - 832:talk 828:Erik 782:talk 757:) - 739:) - 733:talk 729:Erik 706:Done 679:Done 450:and 404:here 244:Plot 99:Daev 2166:-5- 1503:it? 1030:'s 907:why 822:to 432:MoS 353:POV 270:POV 2341:) 2303:) 2287:) 2240:) 2236:- 2194:. 2168:, 2164:, 2160:, 2156:, 2152:, 2148:, 2144:, 2140:, 2136:, 2132:, 2041:. 2021:. 1990:. 1972:) 1953:) 1926:) 1911:) 1890:) 1886:• 1857:) 1840:) 1818:) 1794:) 1778:. 1765:. 1750:. 1733:) 1711:) 1689:) 1666:) 1638:) 1623:) 1603:) 1555:) 1551:• 1511:) 1491:) 1463:• 1437:- 1423:- 1409:- 1395:- 1381:- 1367:- 1353:- 1339:- 1323:- 1309:- 1295:- 1280:- 1266:- 1252:- 1232:- 1218:- 1204:- 1190:- 1175:- 1161:- 1147:- 1133:- 1119:- 1105:- 1091:- 1077:- 1062:- 1048:- 963:• 938:) 918:• 881:) 834:• 802:, 784:) 753:• 735:• 625:: 619:: 606:: 598:b 592:: 584:a 565:: 559:. 545:: 539:. 522:: 518:b 512:: 508:a 505:. 491:: 487:OR 483:c 477:: 469:b 463:: 459:a 456:. 436:: 428:b 422:: 418:a 415:. 398:GA 381:. 310:, 143:\ 97:-- 2337:( 2299:( 2283:( 2232:( 2222:: 2218:@ 2176:: 2128:@ 1984:: 1980:@ 1968:( 1949:( 1922:( 1907:( 1882:( 1853:( 1836:( 1830:: 1826:@ 1814:( 1790:( 1782:. 1769:. 1756:. 1729:( 1707:( 1685:( 1662:( 1634:( 1619:( 1599:( 1547:( 1507:( 1487:( 1459:( 959:( 934:( 914:( 877:( 830:( 780:( 773:I 749:( 731:( 604:) 590:) 489:) 485:( 475:) 434:) 430:( 171:1 140:C 137:/ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index