340:"A player who is currently batting is denoted as a batter." He may be in baseball for all I know but in cricket he is known as a batsman. As for the definitions of a Hook and a Pull they must have changed since I played cricket as a young man as they were basically the same shot (no difference in height) but when playing a hook the batsman moved into the line of the ball, with the risk of being hit on the head, to better time his shot, whereas the pull was played outside the line of the ball (no risk of being hit) but more difficult to time correctly.Williamgeorgefraser 07:42, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
921:
912:
975:
954:
383:
technique that doesn't start with describing the batsmen moving either forward or back as a starting point is doomed to failure. There should also be separate techniques on playing fast bowling and spin bowling, seeing as they are almost completely different skills. Batting is actually a relatively simple exercise in theory, but this article makes it sound fiendishly complicated
985:
600:
differences. There do seem to be quite a few sources stating this is a new stroke and with no response from other editors here I'm resigned to allow you to add the information on this shot back into this article. However when you do please make it clear the differences compared to the
Marillier shot so layman readers like myself can understand. Thanks. --
1447:
645:
reverse sweep and slog obviously belong in this section, they have been adopted by many cricketers and can be considered as a genuine, bona fide unorthodox shots. They have also been popular enough to enter common usage in cricket commentary as a descriptive terms i.e. they are part of the cricket lexicon.
599:
I'm sorry but I still don't quite understand the differences, how is
Dilshan's played with a vertical bat, a vertical bat in my mind would see the toe end of the bat facing the sky and the shot being an uppercut. Without a video of the Marillier shot I don't think my creativeless mind can imagine the
364:
I fear you are rather out of date and presumably don't listen to Test Match
Special, that home of undeniable experts on cricket. 'Batter' is the preferred term there. The recent development and popularity of women's cricket has made 'batsman' old fashioned. I see no problem with this and I propose to
66:
I disagree. He has cearly missed/mishit the ball as you can see the ball at the bottom right corner of the pic past the wicket and going towards the wicketkeeper. His followthrough is awkward and indicates that he has botched up while trying to chop down at a low bouncing ball (possibly a spinner). I
588:
I quote cricket pundit Trevor
Chesterfield from the above link: Marillier held the bat parallel to the pitch with the toe of the bat pointing towards the bowler, allowing him to either flick or scoop the ball over the wicketkeeper’s head, which is a different action to that used by Dilshan. It could
382:
I agree - this article could really do with some work. For starters, while it is nice to have a video component, that video is worse than useless. The article also simply lists a batsman's shots, without mention of how, why, or against what type of delivery he might play them. Any article on batting
265:
Batting is not just about scoring runs. It also needs some skills like watching the ball carefully and then manouver it around the field. Batsmen like Shahid Afridi are just useless players who just doesnt know anything but slogging at the ball. He wont stop slogging no matter what. Even if his team
841:
I noticed @190.83.209.132 removed the reference to strike rate in the lead. First of all, I think there should be a mention somewhere in this article given its importance to the limited overs game, but more importantly, I think we need to develop some consensus on to what extent (and where) batting
24:
I'm not happy about this statement at all. Firstly it implies that average and strike rate are the same thing or at least in some way linked or eqivalent. Secondly a batsman's strike rate is rarely of any importance outside of limited overs cricket and even there its hardly an accepted measure of a
648:
Things like the switch hit are a marginal case, having only been used by one player and not in common usage amongst players or commentators thus far. Same with the paddle sweep/scoop, which is simply a variation on the sweep shot and thus does not stand on its own as a separate named and described
274:
Seriously speaking, bowling is much more difficult than batting, and much more exhausting. It requires stamina and patience. Its not a fun thing in international cricket. Brett Lee is a wonderful bowler who not only has the stamina, but the determination and attitude to get wickets in a eye blink.
764:
Compared to the depth of information available about different bowling styles and techniques on wikipedia, this article is extremely thin. I think it needs to be expanded dramatically - particularly the information about the orthodox shots (Curiously, there is more than enough info on the gimmick
675:
was discussing amendments he'd put down to the Fixed-Term
Parliament Bill. He said he was told by the clerks that he was "open to batting", and Rees-Mogg made it clear this was a cricket reference. As an American, I find cricket a bit bewildering, so can someone help me out in explaining what the
479:
page. The issue I have with this is that the expression 'straight bat' has a metaphorical meaning which is originated from the tactical implications of undertaking a drive or straight bat shot. However, this conversational metaphor is no longer accessible, as it has been suborned into a tactical
644:
The section on unorthodox shots (in fact the whole article to be honest) needs some proper references. Since anyone can play any type of shot at the ball, there are obviously thousands of variations of cricket shot that may be played. Not all of them enter popular usage though. Things like the
768:
A lot of the content is far too oversimplified as to be useful, and several of the pictures are unhelpful (that picture depicting a village cricketer playing something only distantly related to a cut shot for example). The wheel diagram showing the direction of the various shots is completely
25:
batsman's ability. Many of the game's most prolific batsmen would be classed as accumulators of runs rather than free scorers and none the worse is thought of them because of this. Strike rate is however somewhat more significant for a bowler but this is a different strike rate entirely. --
183:
For historical players certainly of course but I dont think we can ignore the importance of limited overs cricket these days. I'm a purist but the article, like all others, should be aimed at a general audience. Funny you should mention Bevan, I was going to add him for that very reason.
690:
I imagine it means he is willing to have first crack - ie to say his bit first and then let the other "team" respond. I suppose that may indicate that he thinks he has a lot to say, and perhaps feels he can anticipate all the opposition's arguments. Does that make sense?
67:
don't see any "nice arc" there, rather a snapshot of an awkward, off-balance followthrough of a chopping action with the behind of the bat facing the viewer at a weird angle. All I am saying is that there could be a better looking shot than that snap. Nothing major.
652:
The reverse drive and marillier shot I don't consider bona fide unorthodox shots, they have been used very rarely in cricket, to the extent that these descriptive terms are NOT in common usage and are not standard terms used amongst cricket commentators.
726:
What exactly is this list meant to add to the article? It just seems to be a list of names chosen almost entirely at random. I'm inclined to suggest that it should be removed, as there is a perfectly adequate list of famous cricketers elsewhere.
676:
gist of the metaphor was? The best I can come up with on my own is that the amendments are not well written so the minister in charge of the bill will be able to score a lot of debating points. Unfortunately, the context doesn't help much. -
925:
512:
I can find for the evolution of the scoop are equally unclear whether the shot was over fine leg or the keeper which appears the major difference between the scoop and the 'Dilscoop'. Any thoughts to clear up the confusion welcome.
1320:
141:
Chris Cairns has scored more 6's in Test's than anyone else. Thats notable in itself. Also the New
Zealand line up is not up to the standard of others. I'm inclined to re-include him. Its not like there's 100 Kiwis listed.
266:
needs him to stay at the crease. But batsman like
Virender Sehwag is what a team needs. A person who can stay at the crease for a lot of tme and also score runs at a blaze. His stats in both one-dayers and tests prove it.
220:
Any criteria that can be drawn up is better covered by our existing article about cricket records and statistics (not sure of the exact article name). Most runs? Most centuries? Most sixes? Best strike rate? All already
1289:
1249:
1224:
54:
I think the picture's OK. His head is nicely over the ball, he's hit the ball square and downwards, and the bat's going through in a nice arc. The setting is attractively rural as befits the spirit of the game.
656:
Including each and every variation of unorthodox shot that has been played by a batsman at one point or another simply dilutes the effect of trying to explain batting to the encyclopedia reader. Thoughts?
537:
1644:
561:
How do explain the definition of the
Marillier shot on this page then? It is identical to the 'unique' Dilshan. The definition of the Marillier scoop shot has been in existence since November 2005
160:
Err, are we using the primacy of Test cricket here? I can't see how Dhoni comes close otherwise, unless we add Bevan and Dean Jones as well, he averaged 46 in the low scoring eras of ODIs.
310:
already exists and covers everything that is here in much better context and detail, in other words this article was simply a less complete duplicate of that one. I've thus redirected it.
527:
DILSCOOP is played over the batsman himself and the wicket keeper's head and the MARILLER goes towards Fine leg. DILSCOOP has now been accepted by the international media. See the links:
1313:
1664:
1634:
1217:
1649:
1204:
245:
I agree on all points. Removing it will also hopefully stop the constant addition of marginal names and reversion that's been going on for ages. Thank you for your boldness. -
1283:
1262:
1510:
589:
be argued how
Dilshan’s smart revolutionary tactic is an extension of the original Marillier flick, but he has refined it and it has become a more sophisticated stroke.
538:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Cricket/T20WorldCup/StoryPage.aspx?id=3a0e79a9-d14a-43f3-8b5a-6e7461a3a2fd&category=Chunk-HT-UI-ICCWorldTwenty20SectionPage-LatestNews
1231:
440:
This whole article would be really difficult to understand if you dont know anything of cricket. Too much terminology that you wouldnt understand necessarily
1098:
503:
Is the scoop played by
Tillakaratne Dilshan a new shot? The definition of the Mariller shot on this page sounds near identical however the shot described on
336:
This article seems to have beem written by someone for whom English is a second language and Cricket is a distant memory. I'd suggest deleting or rewriting.
1629:
1639:
1102:
1045:
1358:
1269:
1164:
356:
1659:
1035:
579:
First of all 3 questions 1/how do I reply to talk without going to edit? Is there a short cut? 2/ Also how do I do new articles 3/ and add links?
555:
1238:
881:
1245:
621:
1669:
1654:
822:
807:
1011:
1094:
706:
Sort of. I think it makes more sense if the officials were telling him everyone would be batting away his arguments, but yeah. Thank you. -
1624:
461:
484:
and possibly a discussion at the end of the section on Drive shots which covers the use of the term in general conversational English.
1393:
1185:
that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
384:
592:
Besides the effects of the 2 shots are different: 1/ MARILLER - ball goes towards fine leg 2/ DILSCOOP - ball goes to no man's land
1389:
582:
Marillier technique is different - played with a bat parallel to the ground Dilscoop is different - played with a vertical bat See
1007:
998:
959:
1277:
1273:
769:
rubbish. We need firstly to divide the article into seperate sections for front foot and back foot shots and start from there.
934:
1350:
352:
217:
At the moment it does not have any objective criteria by which players are included/excluded. "Notable" by what criteria?
1518:
1484:
1337:
624:
for links/references. I'm not sure what you mean in Q1, to respond to comments you have to edit the page or section. --
108:
really warrant a mention as a notable batsman? While undoubtly a clean striker of the ball and one of the game's great
798:
Is there grounds for a section on shots you're not trying to play.. french cuts, outside, leading and top edges etc.?
1503:
1603:
1562:
847:
1168:
556:
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cricket/murali-and-mendis-keep-a-tight-rein--on-battling-ireland-1705334.html
1585:
826:
811:
617:
348:
231:
better covered in multiple "lists of batsmen by country" or the aforementioned "cricket records and statistics"
940:
911:
489:
1499:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
1539:
1514:
1475:
1354:
882:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060828035326/http://www.icc-cricket.com:80/icc-media/content/story/211848.html
873:
564:
and hasn't been changed, if that definition is incorrect as you claim then why hasn't anybody changed it? --
465:
457:
344:
224:
It is simply a list article masquerading as a sub-section of related article; it is thus in the wrong place
1148:
388:
170:
1595:
1581:
485:
1599:
1573:
1558:
1459:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1409:
1375:
1140:
843:
431:
872:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
155:
133:
1437:
1299:
1116:
454:
Actually, this whole article is difficult to understsand because it's badly written and inaccurate.
531:
1295:
1124:
748:
508:
480:
discussion of actual game play. I suggest that there could be a link to the sporting metaphor list
441:
370:
1535:
885:
785:
770:
728:
692:
629:
605:
569:
518:
445:
406:
1557:" is a redirect to this article. But "French Cut" is not explained here, not even is mentioned.
402:
There ought to be something here about the difference between batting left- and right-handed. —
1460:
1577:
865:
307:
279:
162:
132:
On a similar note does Chris Cairns, great all-rounder that he was, really deserve a mention?
1532:
510:
1371:
1156:
789:
774:
732:
696:
658:
427:
311:
250:
236:
1467:
1261:
Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and
306:
Chasing after a curiousity I idly wondered if an article on batting existed. Lo and behold
200:
154:
I take your point, how about including Scott Styris if your looking to expand the section?
711:
681:
672:
293:
189:
1002:
which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
1186:
1182:
806:
Can someone add "flick shot" under vertical bat shots with some details and references?
426:
into this article. I don't know anything about cricket so I don't want to do it myself.
1333:
990:
743:
504:
366:
50:
Can we have a better picture of a batsman? The current one looks like a batting bunny.
1466:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
595:
Therefore the 2 terms - Mariller and Dilscoop denote 2 different strokes and effects.
22:"A batsman's batting average or strike rate are the accepted measures of his ability."
1618:
1495:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1190:
625:
601:
565:
514:
403:
112:, where he is of course correctly honoured, I can't justify him being listed here. --
1152:
1120:
476:
423:
416:
56:
246:
109:
81:
77:
36:
583:
1554:
980:
784:
I have had a crack at reorganising and expanding. Let me know what you think?
707:
677:
549:
543:
290:
185:
143:
123:
113:
85:
26:
1378:
and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours
1136:
105:
1607:
1589:
1566:
1543:
1522:
1489:
851:
830:
815:
793:
778:
750:
736:
715:
700:
685:
661:
633:
609:
573:
522:
493:
469:
449:
435:
409:
392:
374:
314:
296:
254:
239:
193:
177:
146:
126:
116:
88:
39:
29:
1290:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
325:
974:
953:
1144:
1132:
1003:
286:
1454:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
507:
sounds more like the scoop over the shoulder. The two main references
122:
No one has come to Kapil's defence in 2 weeks so I will remove him. --
1160:
1128:
207:
It is woefully incomplete (every batsman is not included, also see 3)
821:
Added a couple of lines and an image myself. Expand it if possible.
481:
1413:
1311:
Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these
365:
change every reference to 'batsman' or 'batsmen' in this article.
532:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/cricket/article6489070.ece
475:
I came to this page as a consequence of the redirection from the
1288:
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in
1268:
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in
905:
886:
http://www.icc-cricket.com/icc-media/content/story/211848.html
1216:
Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in
891:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1314:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) requested images of cricket people
1533:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/skills/4177934.stm
1241:
for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
876:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
76:
I disagree too. It just looks awkward. I can't imagine a
1218:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
1645:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Everyday life
1205:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
869:
562:
1388:
A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in
1222:
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the
324:
Can you include an image about batting in cricket and
203:
of completely removing this list. Reasons as follows:
742:
Agree, there are no criteria for inclusion. Removed.
214:
list every batsman and still serve any useful purpose
35:
Yes, I agree somewhat. I've edited to reflect this. -
1232:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies
1165:classified by the WikiProject as high-importance
172:click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!
84:ever getting snapped in a position like that. --
1635:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Everyday life
482:http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_metaphors#Sport
1665:Start-Class cricket articles of Top-importance
1509:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
1203:Add infoboxes to the player articles found at
1319:Add pictures for grounds missing photos from
8:
1398:Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.
1099:Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles
584:http://www.island.lk/2009/06/15/sports4.html
1650:Start-Class vital articles in Everyday life
909:
550:http://www.nation.lk/2009/06/14/sports4.htm
544:http://www.nation.lk/2009/06/14/sports2.htm
1359:ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel
1053:
948:
864:I have just modified one external link on
1270:List of current first-class cricket teams
760:This article desperately needs expanding
1282:Create articles about cricket in these
950:
289:is there that needs disambiguation? --
1630:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
1234:and improve these to at least B-class.
1244:Create articles for redlinks present
1006:. Please participate by visiting the
903:to let others know (documentation at
7:
1408:Export all cricket terms present in
1332:Expand the anniversary coverage for
1095:Category:Unassessed cricket articles
1020:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cricket
939:It is of interest to the following
620:will help you start a new page and
1640:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
1394:Template:National cricket captains
14:
1390:Template:International cricketers
1230:Check the listing of key bios at
1163:, and other fundamental articles
868:. Please take a moment to review
1445:
1183:WikiProject Cricket cleanup list
983:
973:
952:
919:
910:
616:To answer your other questions:
1660:Top-importance cricket articles
1278:Under-19 national cricket teams
1057:WikiProject Cricket To-do list:
1040:This article has been rated as
328:??: - Yes, that would be nice.
1567:21:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
1351:ICC International umpire panel
794:20:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
1544:20:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
1256:Cricket teams & countries
831:16:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
816:16:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
751:16:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
737:16:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
716:03:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
649:shot in the cricket lexicon.
127:23:51, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
1670:WikiProject Cricket articles
1655:Start-Class cricket articles
1608:21:55, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
1590:17:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
1490:11:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
1338:Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries
1181:There is a toolserver based
1023:Template:WikiProject Cricket
852:03:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
701:09:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
686:02:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
470:05:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
40:23:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
837:Batting average/Strike rate
410:15:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
393:14:19, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
375:06:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
117:23:02, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
89:23:02, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
30:00:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
1686:
1625:Start-Class vital articles
1046:project's importance scale
861:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
842:statistics are discussed.
779:14:50, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
494:04:33, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
436:16:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
147:09:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
1523:15:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
1294:Create a link as such on
1052:
1039:
968:
947:
662:09:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
634:21:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
610:21:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
574:20:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
523:11:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
450:00:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
422:I have proposed to merge
315:17:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
297:14:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
996:This article is part of
255:23:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
240:13:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
194:05:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
178:05:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
59:20:01, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1355:ICC Elite referee panel
1225:task force redlink list
857:External links modified
285:Um, what other sort of
1327:On this day in cricket
1274:National cricket teams
1239:batting/bowling graphs
1149:Pakistan Cricket Board
1410:List of cricket terms
1141:limited overs cricket
1103:Assessment Department
933:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
926:level-5 vital article
1504:MS Dhoni batting.jpg
1376:Women's Test cricket
1300:Cricket Australia XI
1117:fair and unfair play
1101:for importance: see
1296:Template:Cr-Aus/doc
1125:first-class cricket
999:WikiProject Cricket
895:parameter below to
349:Williamgeorgefraser
302:Redirect to batting
1576:: added a section
1515:Community Tech bot
1478:InternetArchiveBot
1167:so that they meet
1088:Article assessment
935:content assessment
332:Article is rubbish
227:This info is FAR,
1433:
1432:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1420:
1284:missing countries
1014:for more details.
866:Batting (cricket)
554:THE INDEPENDENT
536:HINDUSTAN TIMES
460:comment added by
398:left/right-handed
361:
347:comment added by
308:batting (cricket)
280:Batsman (cricket)
1677:
1600:Meridiana solare
1574:Meridiana solare
1559:Meridiana solare
1528:Possible sources
1488:
1479:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1441:
1171:policy standards
1169:WP:Verifiability
1157:underarm bowling
1054:
1028:
1027:
1026:cricket articles
1024:
1021:
1018:
993:
988:
987:
986:
977:
970:
969:
964:
956:
949:
932:
923:
922:
915:
914:
906:
844:Triptothecottage
667:Metaphorical use
640:Unorthodox shots
472:
360:
341:
173:
165:
1685:
1684:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1615:
1614:
1551:
1530:
1511:nomination page
1497:
1482:
1477:
1450:
1446:
1435:
1372:Women's cricket
1085:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1016:
1015:
989:
984:
982:
962:
930:
920:
874:this simple FaQ
859:
839:
823:117.192.176.110
808:117.192.176.110
804:
762:
746:
724:
722:Notable Batsmen
673:Jacob Rees-Mogg
671:On 18 January,
669:
642:
501:
455:
420:
400:
342:
334:
322:
304:
283:
272:
263:
199:I've taken the
171:
163:
102:
100:Notable Batsmen
48:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1683:
1681:
1673:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1627:
1617:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1596:YorkshireExpat
1582:YorkshireExpat
1550:
1547:
1529:
1526:
1507:
1506:
1496:
1493:
1472:
1471:
1464:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1396:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1379:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1334:Portal:Cricket
1329:
1328:
1324:
1323:
1317:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1292:
1286:
1280:
1266:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1242:
1235:
1228:
1220:
1213:
1212:
1211:Cricket people
1208:
1207:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1178:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1097:for class and
1090:
1089:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1050:
1049:
1042:Top-importance
1038:
1032:
1031:
1029:
995:
994:
991:Cricket portal
978:
966:
965:
963:Top‑importance
957:
945:
944:
938:
916:
889:
888:
880:Added archive
858:
855:
838:
835:
834:
833:
803:
800:
783:
761:
758:
756:
754:
753:
744:
723:
720:
719:
718:
668:
665:
641:
638:
637:
636:
613:
612:
577:
576:
505:Marillier shot
500:
497:
486:Bendigo Bunyip
419:
413:
399:
396:
380:
379:
378:
377:
333:
330:
321:
318:
303:
300:
282:
277:
271:
270:Bowling Skills
268:
262:
261:Batting Skills
259:
258:
257:
233:
232:
225:
222:
218:
215:
208:
197:
196:
152:
151:
150:
149:
130:
129:
101:
98:
96:
94:
93:
92:
91:
71:
70:
69:
68:
61:
60:
47:
44:
43:
42:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1682:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1626:
1623:
1622:
1620:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1598:, thank you.
1597:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1548:
1546:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1536:GreekApple123
1534:
1527:
1525:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1505:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1494:
1492:
1491:
1486:
1481:
1480:
1469:
1465:
1462:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1443:
1439:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1318:
1316:
1315:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1291:
1287:
1285:
1281:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1240:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:
1110:Verifiability
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1063:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
992:
981:
979:
976:
972:
971:
967:
961:
958:
955:
951:
946:
942:
936:
928:
927:
917:
913:
908:
907:
904:
902:
898:
894:
887:
883:
879:
878:
877:
875:
871:
867:
862:
856:
854:
853:
849:
845:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
819:
818:
817:
813:
809:
801:
799:
796:
795:
791:
787:
781:
780:
776:
772:
766:
759:
757:
752:
749:
747:
741:
740:
739:
738:
734:
730:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
704:
703:
702:
698:
694:
688:
687:
683:
679:
674:
666:
664:
663:
660:
654:
650:
646:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:
611:
607:
603:
598:
597:
596:
593:
590:
586:
585:
580:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
559:
558:
557:
552:
551:
546:
545:
540:
539:
534:
533:
528:
525:
524:
520:
516:
511:
509:
506:
498:
496:
495:
491:
487:
483:
478:
473:
471:
467:
463:
462:62.194.83.124
459:
452:
451:
447:
443:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
418:
414:
412:
411:
408:
405:
397:
395:
394:
390:
386:
376:
372:
368:
363:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
339:
338:
337:
331:
329:
327:
319:
317:
316:
313:
309:
301:
299:
298:
295:
292:
288:
281:
278:
276:
269:
267:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
242:
241:
238:
230:
226:
223:
219:
216:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
202:
195:
191:
187:
182:
181:
180:
179:
175:
174:
167:
166:
158:
157:
148:
145:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
128:
125:
121:
120:
119:
118:
115:
111:
107:
99:
97:
90:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
73:
72:
65:
64:
63:
62:
58:
53:
52:
51:
45:
41:
38:
34:
33:
32:
31:
28:
23:
16:
1552:
1531:
1508:
1498:
1476:
1473:
1453:
1444:
1434:
1312:
1223:
1187:one big list
1153:spin bowling
1121:fast bowling
1041:
997:
941:WikiProjects
924:
900:
896:
892:
890:
863:
860:
840:
805:
797:
782:
767:
763:
755:
725:
689:
670:
655:
651:
647:
643:
594:
591:
587:
581:
578:
553:
548:THE NATION
547:
542:THE NATION
541:
535:
529:
526:
502:
477:Straight Bat
474:
453:
439:
424:Straight Bat
421:
417:Straight Bat
401:
385:213.70.98.66
381:
335:
323:
305:
284:
273:
264:
234:
228:
211:
198:
169:
164:YellowMonkey
161:
159:
153:
131:
110:all-rounders
103:
95:
49:
21:
20:
1438:Sourcecheck
1105:for details
931:Start-class
530:THE TIMES
456:—Preceding
428:PrimeHunter
415:Merge from
343:—Preceding
156:Vladhilavic
134:Vladhilavic
82:Carl Hooper
78:David Gower
1619:Categories
1555:French Cut
1549:French Cut
1485:Report bug
1414:Wiktionary
1191:CSV format
1012:talk pages
802:Flick shot
235:Thoughts?
1468:this tool
1461:this tool
1198:Infoboxes
1137:leg break
929:is rated
745:wjemather
367:treesmill
212:can never
201:bold step
106:Kapil Dev
1474:Cheers.—
1263:Zimbabwe
765:shots).
626:Jpeeling
602:Jpeeling
566:Jpeeling
515:Jpeeling
499:Dilscoop
458:unsigned
442:ClamsonJ
404:sjorford
357:contribs
345:unsigned
326:off spin
221:covered!
1578:on this
1370:Expand
1349:Expand
1344:Umpires
1237:Create
1189:and in
1176:Cleanup
1145:not out
1133:innings
1115:Update
1071:history
1044:on the
1017:Cricket
1008:project
1004:cricket
960:Cricket
893:checked
870:my edit
287:batsman
57:RobertG
46:Picture
1383:Update
1306:Images
1161:wicket
1129:googly
1093:Check
937:scale.
901:failed
786:Py0alb
771:Py0alb
729:Py0alb
693:Py0alb
659:Zunaid
312:Zunaid
294:(Talk)
247:dmmaus
237:Zunaid
37:dmmaus
1403:Other
1365:Women
1081:purge
1076:watch
918:This
708:Rrius
678:Rrius
320:Image
291:ALoan
186:LiamE
144:LiamE
124:LiamE
114:LiamE
104:Does
86:LiamE
27:LiamE
17:Intro
1604:talk
1586:talk
1563:talk
1540:talk
1519:talk
1392:and
1321:here
1298:for
1250:here
1248:and
1246:here
1066:edit
1010:and
897:true
848:talk
827:talk
812:talk
790:talk
775:talk
733:talk
712:talk
697:talk
682:talk
630:talk
622:this
618:This
606:talk
570:talk
519:talk
490:talk
466:talk
446:talk
432:talk
389:talk
371:talk
353:talk
251:talk
190:talk
1513:. —
1442:).
1412:to
1336:at
1036:Top
899:or
884:to
229:FAR
210:It
80:or
1621::
1606:)
1588:)
1580:.
1565:)
1542:)
1521:)
1440:}}
1436:{{
1374:,
1357:;
1353:;
1276:;
1272:;
1159:,
1155:,
1151:,
1147:,
1143:,
1139:,
1135:,
1131:,
1127:,
1123:,
1119:,
850:)
829:)
814:)
792:)
777:)
735:)
714:)
699:)
684:)
632:)
608:)
572:)
521:)
513:--
492:)
468:)
448:)
434:)
407:++
391:)
373:)
359:)
355:•
253:)
192:)
184:--
176:)
142:--
55:--
1602:(
1594:@
1584:(
1572:@
1561:(
1553:"
1538:(
1517:(
1487:)
1483:(
1470:.
1463:.
1451:Y
1265:;
1193:)
1048:.
943::
846:(
825:(
810:(
788:(
773:(
731:(
710:(
695:(
680:(
628:(
604:(
568:(
517:(
488:(
464:(
444:(
430:(
387:(
369:(
351:(
249:(
188:(
168:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.