Knowledge

Talk:Battle of Pakchon/GA1

Source ๐Ÿ“

482: 462: 446: 418: 393: 370: 358: 337: 321: 309: 278: 242: 42: 179:
It would be interesting to know more about Walsh's background; it seems surprising that the commander of one of Australia's three regular infantry battalions lacked experience commanding infantry so soon after World War II, when there were dozens of experienced battalion commanders potentially
189:
More information on the experiences of the Chinese forces in this battle would be useful, if this is available (which I suspect it isn't; while this engagement was a big deal for the Commonwealth forces, it was a pretty minor affair for the Chinese at this stage of the war)
47: 80: 70: 272: 126: 122: 176:"Encountering only one strong North Korean position which they quickly turned" - 'turned' is probably a bit too technical - 'outflanked' perhaps? 52: 107: 220: 99: 440: 172:
This is a nicely written and highly detailed article which meets the GA criteria. Accordingly, my comments are pretty limited:
75: 331: 193:
Cheers for these comments. I'll look for a bit more on Walsh and see if I can incorporate it into the article. I pinged
252: 295: 183:"given the potential to mask infiltration of their positions." - 'mask' is probably also a bit too technical 517: 412: 202: 115: 17: 197:
for any additional Chinese content but unfortunately it doesn't appear that any more is available.
513: 198: 92: 498: 432: 303: 260: 158: 150: 224: 383: 256: 456: 268: 264: 521: 502: 494: 206: 194: 162: 154: 146: 153:) 08:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC) I'll probably review this over the weekend. 455:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
439:
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
134: 103: 318:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 186:'offensive support' might also be too technical 8: 30: 512:Thanks Nick. Your time is appreciated. 61: 33: 7: 390:Fair representation without bias: 215:Assessment against the GA criteria 24: 480: 460: 444: 416: 391: 368: 356: 335: 319: 307: 276: 240: 1: 481: 461: 445: 417: 392: 369: 357: 336: 320: 308: 277: 241: 522:06:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 503:00:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 207:06:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 163:08:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 542: 436:to illustrate the topic? 234:reasonably well written 18:Talk:Battle of Pakchon 350:broad in its coverage 304:References to sources 332:No original research 441:fair use rationales 355:A. Major aspects: 291:factually accurate 239:A. Prose quality: 457:suitable captions 89: 88: 533: 484: 483: 464: 463: 448: 447: 420: 419: 395: 394: 372: 371: 360: 359: 339: 338: 323: 322: 311: 310: 280: 279: 244: 243: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 541: 540: 536: 535: 534: 532: 531: 530: 255:compliance for 217: 170: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 539: 537: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 479:Pass or Fail: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 453: 452: 451: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 365: 364: 363: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 328: 327: 326: 316: 315: 314: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 265:words to watch 249: 248: 247: 216: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 187: 184: 181: 177: 169: 166: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 538: 523: 519: 515: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 500: 496: 486: 485: 478: 477: 475: 472: 466: 465: 458: 454: 450: 449: 442: 438: 437: 435: 434: 428: 422: 421: 414: 410: 409: 407: 403: 397: 396: 389: 388: 386: 385: 380: 374: 373: 366: 362: 361: 354: 353: 351: 347: 341: 340: 333: 329: 325: 324: 317: 313: 312: 305: 301: 300: 298: 297: 292: 288: 282: 281: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 245: 238: 237: 235: 231: 230: 229: 228: 226: 223:review โ€“ see 222: 214: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174: 173: 167: 165: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 514:Anotherclown 493: 473: 430: 405: 382: 367:B. Focused: 349: 294: 290: 233: 227:for criteria 219: 218: 199:Anotherclown 171: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 195:User:Jim101 104:visual edit 296:verifiable 180:available. 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 413:edit wars 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 431:contain 429:Does it 225:WP:WIAGA 168:Comments 76:Criteria 474:Overall 415:, etc: 384:neutral 269:fiction 127:history 108:history 94:Article 495:Nick-D 433:images 406:stable 404:Is it 381:Is it 348:Is it 289:Is it 271:, and 261:layout 232:Is it 155:Nick-D 147:Nick-D 273:lists 136:Watch 16:< 518:talk 499:talk 293:and 257:lead 203:talk 159:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 411:No 330:C. 302:A. 253:MoS 251:B. 520:) 501:) 476:: 459:: 443:: 408:? 387:? 352:? 334:: 306:: 299:? 275:: 267:, 263:, 259:, 236:? 221:GA 205:) 161:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 516:( 497:( 201:( 157:( 149:( 132:ยท 129:) 121:( 113:ยท 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Battle of Pakchon
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Nick-D
talk
Nick-D
talk
08:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
User:Jim101
Anotherclown
talk
06:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
GA
WP:WIAGA
MoS
lead
layout
words to watch

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘