1308:
accepting the non-English sources on good faith since the sources I've looked at have not been on the money. I'd like to get a response to determine how these issues can be resolved while this is on hold or if I should fail it to allow for a re-write. This is an important subject and there's some good scholarship here but it's not clear enough for me to feel good about. There's also the image issue to resolve.
1302:
1282:
1185:
1145:
1120:
1097:
1011:
986:
872:
265:
234:
198:
42:
1307:
I am growing very concerned on the sloppiness of the sourcing. When I see a citation I expect it to represent exactly what the text says with little variation. With so many sourcing issues it's not clear to me if there's original research (as in synthesis) going on. I'm also having doubts about
1346:
I'm glad we were finally able to complete this review. I spent more time at the library than I had intended but that's part and parcel of a GA review. I would warn you that your writing style seems to create a narrative with flourish only citing
295:
Successors of Drake which even has detailed map. Added this too in relevant sections of the article. Was on page 400 in
Wernham's book so changed the first citation with relevant page no.s. Both say here that Cecil gave the order rather than the
1228:
Unless you can find proof the image is not copywritten, I'd remove the image. It's a shame because I'm pretty sure the image itself would be fine but the museum's webpage seems to assert copyright and I have to take their word for it.
824:
I think you misplaced the
Corbett citation. The linked page 364 doesn't talk at all about English dominance of the seas... perhaps you meant page 366 for Philip abandoning an amphibious invasion of England?
1351:. I dislike this style because your sources do not always support the assertions you're trying to make with your text. Please remember that Knowledge is a tertiary source and unlike academic writing, it's
1332:
put in the non
English sources and that I cannot help with seeing as he seemed to disagree with some of the points. As for the image I may just remove it if nothing can be done about the copyright.
47:
126:
866:
122:
80:
1375:
I will learn from this and last thing I want is any arguments... many thanks for taking the timeout to review this and yes I spent a long time in the library too.
1016:
There's no discussion (as
Bicheno mentions) of Fredrico Spinola's history of privateer activity, or that this battle was the nation-state culmination of earlier
107:
52:
70:
1175:
228:
99:
710:. You are prohibited from developing your own conclusions. Knowledge is a tertiary source. While you are probably right, that's not what we do here.
924:
507:
I realize that. My point is, does every other reader intuitively understand that? I don't speak
Spanish so I didn't initially know to what
156:
164:
786:
Bicheno mentions flyboats in the book but not on the same page as the rest of this material and not even for this naval battle.
1191:
75:
980:
192:
115:
17:
877:
Using the "autogenerated" title for most of the sources only makes checking these sources harder. You would do well to try
575:
Strange he seems to get mixed up Sir Robert
Mansell at Cezimbra yet it was Ricahrd Leveson who was at Cezimbra NOT Mansell.
273:
There is no mention of the Queen deciding to act, appointing
Mansell, or ordering him to join with the States fleet.
594:
Bicheno says that the
English and Dutch were informed of Spinola's movements; Bicheno does not specify about spies.
368:
The source does not say that
Spinola was blockaded at Dunkirk, although we can assume the naval battle ended there.
293:
Added source which also says same (Calendar of state papers). Also found a new source by
Corbett which I have added
1179:
1380:
1337:
1272:
1254:
1219:
1055:
962:
912:
856:
811:
775:
735:
697:
657:
623:
580:
536:
498:
434:
393:
356:
301:
208:
188:
92:
750:
Bicheno says that Mansell was only 29 when he led this fleet against the Spanish, which seems impressive to me.
409:
The citation itself is wrong. The book that addresses this action is in volume 4. The page number is 114-116.
1363:
1316:
1237:
1202:
1194:
is copywritten. While I would assume that it is too old and is now public domain, the website says otherwise.
1167:
1072:
1034:
935:
895:
833:
794:
758:
718:
680:
640:
602:
563:
519:
469:
417:
376:
329:
281:
150:
1171:
251:
1139:
1022:
1005:
632:
It is not your job to theorize about what the text might mean. Strike that part of the sentence, please.
1376:
1333:
1250:
1215:
1051:
958:
908:
852:
807:
771:
731:
693:
653:
619:
576:
532:
494:
430:
389:
352:
297:
1357:
1310:
1231:
1196:
1066:
1028:
929:
889:
827:
788:
752:
712:
674:
634:
596:
557:
513:
463:
411:
370:
323:
275:
146:
1352:
1329:
1159:
1091:
259:
216:
1384:
1370:
1341:
1323:
1258:
1244:
1223:
1209:
1079:
1059:
1041:
966:
942:
916:
902:
860:
840:
815:
801:
779:
765:
739:
725:
701:
687:
661:
647:
627:
609:
584:
570:
540:
526:
502:
476:
438:
424:
397:
383:
360:
336:
305:
288:
160:
707:
168:
1110:
212:
1276:
224:
220:
881:
672:
Bicheno does not specify about the English fleet turning to port for a broadside.
652:
Righto will change this with added source and who was informed (Robert Cecil).
388:
Corbett mentions the blockade to where he finally meets his end a year later.
184:
1020:, or that the English and Dutch had sought specifically to interdict Spanish
1017:
1328:
I will change this as much I can I hopefully I have improved the sourcing.
453:
which to some English-only speakers is not readily identifiable with
555:
or the gale, although he does mention one Dutch vessel was damaged.
847:
Not sure what happened there - changed as per new source Corbett -
134:
103:
481:
These are translated into English - San Felipe is the
692:
This is a typical naval maneuver but I can remove it.
511:referred. You should spell it out in the article.
923:Much of the text from Motley can also be found at
806:changed reference to Corbett who mentions this.
1190:The Royal Museum of Greenwich seems to assert
1249:Will remove it for now until it gets sorted.
8:
1271:B. Images are provided if possible and are
1046:I will have a look at this but Wernham in
30:
313:The source mentions Spinola running into
61:
33:
531:I have placed said names in brackets.
7:
270:For the Wernham source (page 401):
1117:Fair representation without bias:
1050:discuses this on page 400 in 1599.
927:so you probably ought to link it.
195:, or spelling and grammar errors:
24:
907:Will try using that from now on.
1300:
1280:
1183:
1143:
1118:
1095:
1009:
984:
870:
865:B. Citation to reliable sources
263:
232:
196:
1192:File:Dover, 23 October 1602.jpg
551:Motley makes no mention of the
18:Talk:Battle of the Narrow Seas
1:
1353:not meant to make an argument
343:Spinola ran into the 400 ton
260:appropriate reference section
161:00:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
1385:23:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1371:06:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1342:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1324:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1301:
1281:
1259:20:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
1245:01:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
1224:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1184:
1144:
1119:
1096:
1080:06:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
1060:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1042:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1010:
985:
967:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
943:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
917:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
903:23:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
871:
861:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
841:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
816:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
802:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
780:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
766:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
740:20:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
726:01:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
706:So we're clear, please read
702:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
688:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
662:20:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
648:01:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
628:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
610:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
585:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
571:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
541:20:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
527:01:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
503:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
477:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
439:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
425:08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
398:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
384:23:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
361:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
347:launched in 1559 along with
337:23:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
306:19:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
289:23:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
264:
233:
197:
1210:01:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
341:Bicheno says so on pg 298
1411:
1176:valid fair use rationales
1163:to illustrate the topic?
614:I see no problem in this
887:to cover the citations.
591:For the Bicheno source:
1275:to the topic, and have
406:For the Motley source:
351:. Added relevant page.
178:reasonably well written
1214:How do I change this?
1018:private-venture piracy
1048:Return of the Armadas
999:broad in its coverage
770:Indeed.. Impressive.
445:Motley refers to the
981:No original research
849:Successors of Drake
1330:User:Weymar Horren
247:factually accurate
1277:suitable captions
1178:are provided for
618:might mean spies.
89:
88:
1402:
1369:
1366:
1360:
1322:
1319:
1313:
1304:
1303:
1284:
1283:
1243:
1240:
1234:
1208:
1205:
1199:
1187:
1186:
1180:non-free content
1172:copyright status
1147:
1146:
1122:
1121:
1099:
1098:
1078:
1075:
1069:
1040:
1037:
1031:
1013:
1012:
988:
987:
941:
938:
932:
901:
898:
892:
886:
880:
874:
873:
839:
836:
830:
800:
797:
791:
764:
761:
755:
724:
721:
715:
686:
683:
677:
646:
643:
637:
608:
605:
599:
569:
566:
560:
525:
522:
516:
475:
472:
466:
461:, respectively.
423:
420:
414:
382:
379:
373:
335:
332:
326:
287:
284:
278:
267:
266:
236:
235:
200:
199:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1364:
1358:
1356:
1317:
1311:
1309:
1238:
1232:
1230:
1203:
1197:
1195:
1073:
1067:
1065:
1035:
1029:
1027:
936:
930:
928:
896:
890:
888:
884:
878:
867:where necessary
834:
828:
826:
795:
789:
787:
759:
753:
751:
719:
713:
711:
681:
675:
673:
641:
635:
633:
603:
597:
595:
564:
558:
556:
520:
514:
512:
470:
464:
462:
418:
412:
410:
377:
371:
369:
330:
324:
322:
282:
276:
274:
211:compliance for
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1408:
1406:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1359:Chris Troutman
1312:Chris Troutman
1299:Pass or Fail:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1233:Chris Troutman
1198:Chris Troutman
1166:A. Images are
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1068:Chris Troutman
1030:Chris Troutman
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
957:Done. Thanks.
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
931:Chris Troutman
921:
920:
919:
891:Chris Troutman
863:
845:
844:
843:
829:Chris Troutman
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
790:Chris Troutman
784:
783:
782:
754:Chris Troutman
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
714:Chris Troutman
676:Chris Troutman
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
636:Chris Troutman
598:Chris Troutman
589:
588:
587:
573:
559:Chris Troutman
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
515:Chris Troutman
465:Chris Troutman
443:
442:
441:
413:Chris Troutman
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
372:Chris Troutman
366:
365:
364:
325:Chris Troutman
311:
310:
309:
277:Chris Troutman
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
221:words to watch
205:
204:
203:
147:Chris troutman
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1407:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1367:
1361:
1354:
1350:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1320:
1314:
1306:
1305:
1298:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1286:
1285:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1241:
1235:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1200:
1193:
1189:
1188:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1155:
1149:
1148:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1134:
1130:
1124:
1123:
1116:
1115:
1113:
1112:
1107:
1101:
1100:
1093:
1089:
1081:
1076:
1070:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1038:
1032:
1025:
1024:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1007:
1006:Major aspects
1003:
1002:
1000:
996:
990:
989:
982:
978:
977:
976:
975:
968:
964:
960:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
944:
939:
933:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
905:
904:
899:
893:
883:
876:
875:
868:
864:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
837:
831:
823:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
803:
798:
792:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
768:
767:
762:
756:
749:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:
727:
722:
716:
709:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
690:
689:
684:
678:
671:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
644:
638:
631:
630:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:well informed
613:
612:
611:
606:
600:
593:
592:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
572:
567:
561:
554:
550:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
523:
517:
510:
506:
505:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
479:
478:
473:
467:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
426:
421:
415:
408:
407:
405:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:
385:
380:
374:
367:
363:
362:
358:
354:
348:
344:
340:
339:
338:
333:
327:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
303:
299:
292:
291:
290:
285:
279:
272:
271:
269:
268:
261:
257:
256:
254:
253:
248:
244:
238:
237:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
194:
190:
186:
183:A. Prose is "
182:
181:
179:
175:
174:
173:
172:
170:
167:review – see
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
1348:
1293:
1157:
1132:
1109:
1064:Never mind.
1047:
1021:
998:
848:
615:
552:
508:
491:Morning Star
490:
486:
482:
458:
454:
451:Morning Star
450:
446:
350:
346:
342:
318:
314:
294:
250:
246:
177:
171:for criteria
163:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
1170:with their
191:", without
104:visual edit
455:San Felipe
447:St. Philip
258:A. Has an
252:verifiable
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
1349:pro forma
1140:edit wars
483:St Philip
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
1377:ChrisWet
1334:ChrisWet
1273:relevant
1251:ChrisWet
1216:ChrisWet
1158:contain
1156:Does it
1052:ChrisWet
959:ChrisWet
925:this URL
909:ChrisWet
853:ChrisWet
808:ChrisWet
772:ChrisWet
732:ChrisWet
708:WP:SYNTH
694:ChrisWet
654:ChrisWet
620:ChrisWet
577:ChrisWet
533:ChrisWet
495:ChrisWet
449:and the
431:ChrisWet
390:ChrisWet
353:ChrisWet
317:but not
298:ChrisWet
193:copyvios
169:WP:WIAGA
157:contribs
76:Criteria
1294:Overall
1142:, etc:
1111:neutral
1092:Focused
429:Changed
349:Victory
319:Victory
225:fiction
189:concise
127:history
108:history
94:Article
1174:, and
1168:tagged
1160:images
1133:stable
1131:Is it
1108:Is it
997:Is it
730:Done.
553:Samson
509:Lucera
489:means
487:Lucera
459:Lucera
296:Queen.
245:Is it
227:, and
217:layout
176:Is it
1023:flota
229:lists
185:clear
136:Watch
16:<
1381:talk
1365:talk
1338:talk
1318:talk
1255:talk
1239:talk
1220:talk
1204:talk
1074:talk
1056:talk
1036:talk
963:talk
937:talk
913:talk
897:talk
857:talk
835:talk
812:talk
796:talk
776:talk
760:talk
736:talk
720:talk
698:talk
682:talk
658:talk
642:talk
624:talk
604:talk
581:talk
565:talk
537:talk
521:talk
499:talk
485:and
471:talk
457:and
435:talk
419:talk
394:talk
378:talk
357:talk
345:Hope
331:talk
315:Hope
302:talk
283:talk
249:and
213:lead
187:and
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
1138:No
1090:B.
1004:A.
979:C.
882:Sfn
209:MoS
207:B.
1383:)
1355:.
1340:)
1296::
1279::
1257:)
1222:)
1182::
1135:?
1114:?
1094::
1058:)
1026:.
1008::
1001:?
983::
965:)
915:)
885:}}
879:{{
869::
859:)
851:.
814:)
778:)
738:)
700:)
660:)
626:)
583:)
539:)
501:)
493:.
437:)
396:)
359:)
321:.
304:)
262::
255:?
231::
223:,
219:,
215:,
180:?
165:GA
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
1379:(
1368:)
1362:(
1336:(
1321:)
1315:(
1253:(
1242:)
1236:(
1218:(
1207:)
1201:(
1077:)
1071:(
1054:(
1039:)
1033:(
961:(
940:)
934:(
911:(
900:)
894:(
855:(
838:)
832:(
810:(
799:)
793:(
774:(
763:)
757:(
734:(
723:)
717:(
696:(
685:)
679:(
656:(
645:)
639:(
622:(
607:)
601:(
579:(
568:)
562:(
535:(
524:)
518:(
497:(
474:)
468:(
433:(
422:)
416:(
392:(
381:)
375:(
355:(
334:)
328:(
300:(
286:)
280:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.