248:
85:
64:
188:
161:
33:
321:
non-free operating system question, but addresses issues that will encompass the design of electronic appliances in the next decades. Therefore, it deserves a balanced explanation in an encyclopedia that aims at giving quickly understandable information about relevant facts. The question arose in an FSF campaign involving a
Microsoft OS, so let's just inform the people about the point from a
393:
should not be removed is that it embodies a question which is rather unique. It is difficult (and nonsensical) to cover that question in
Knowledge (XXG) independently of BadVista. So, is it a relevant question? Dunno. To answer that, one has to put another couple of questions: Is computing an epochal
296:
is already in the Vista article and the FSF who is responsible for this campaign has already a separate article as well. There is no need for a separate article about some FSF campaign criticizing Vista. This article is like an invite to every other campaign to add article on themselves in
Knowledge
320:
The notability derives from the basic questions that the campaign puts. In addition, big users as Intel have expressed serious doubts on adopting Vista. I'll try and describe the basic question in a new section of the article, striving to be objective and not partisan. It is not just a free vs.
441:
This article should not be removed. It got good press, raised points others would not raise, and was successful. It is written from also written from a neutral tone and is not SOAP. It is certainly notable enough to deserve the short article it
341:
Asking a relevant question does not make YOU relevant, sorry. The fact that a small group agrees with a large group isn't cause for notability either, at least not until the small group actually, you know, DOES something notable.
777:
591:
262:
685:
681:
667:
782:
772:
637:
500:
238:
143:
767:
752:
228:
133:
257:
171:
787:
762:
747:
204:
109:
595:
653:
614:
371:
516:
195:
166:
92:
69:
663:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
553:
398:
at the end of neolithic?) If yes, will freedom be preserved during that transition? (This is not the place to philosophize whether
757:
44:
609:
No, FSF does not "like" Windows XP neither Mac OS X, and not all FreeBSD and GNU/Linux are "entirely free" (only these in
426:
728:
575:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
473:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
382:
733:
622:
599:
561:
539:
524:
491:
451:
430:
353:
336:
306:
684:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
618:
50:
32:
520:
719:
645:
374:
414:
289:
349:
105:
654:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090614034441/http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/29/defective-by-design-.html
378:
703:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
691:
557:
322:
203:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
108:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
644:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
285:
549:
657:
587:
535:
447:
688:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
704:
410:, but some of the implied considerations would help to correctly place FSF and its campaigns.)
422:
345:
332:
298:
548:"Free Software Foundation anti-Windows campaigns" title would be better because it excludes
403:
711:
670:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
395:
710:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
677:
741:
531:
510:
487:
443:
302:
293:
530:"Free Software Foundation anti-DRM campaigns" would be more specific and clearer...
364:
418:
328:
247:
399:
381:) which is not quite the same subject. Furthermore, Intel "obviously" lauds Vista
407:
610:
84:
63:
676:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
17:
200:
187:
160:
101:
483:
390:
199:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
97:
363:
is the BadVista supporters (7000 registered supporters at end of 2008
467:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
569:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
496:
284:
The article lacks any significant encyclopedic content, it lacks
658:
http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/29/defective-by-design-.html
613:
are entirely free). There is some way to rewrite this article
370:
is presumably Intel (86,000 employees worldwide at end of 2007
26:
246:
648:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
394:
transition? (How does it compare to, say, the advent of
641:
590:
caused much grievance, of course in article itself.
96:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
680:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
638:Free Software Foundation anti-Windows campaigns
501:Free Software Foundation anti-Windows campaigns
666:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
344:I also think this article should be removed.
30:
636:I have just modified one external link on
155:
58:
778:Low-importance Microsoft Windows articles
157:
60:
783:WikiProject Microsoft Windows articles
773:Start-Class Microsoft Windows articles
213:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Microsoft
118:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
193:This article is within the scope of
90:This article is within the scope of
49:It is of interest to the following
605:Mac OS X is not "less restrictive"
25:
768:Low-importance Microsoft articles
753:Low-importance Computing articles
640:. Please take a moment to review
373:). However, they merely consider
288:and it is aq soapbox article and
290:Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox
186:
159:
83:
62:
31:
478:The result of the proposal was
233:This article has been rated as
138:This article has been rated as
788:WikiProject Microsoft articles
763:Start-Class Microsoft articles
748:Start-Class Computing articles
280:This article should be removed
216:Template:WikiProject Microsoft
121:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
354:15:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
337:13:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
258:WikiProject Microsoft Windows
255:This article is supported by
207:and see a list of open tasks.
112:and see a list of open tasks.
623:18:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
611:Free GNU/Linux distributions
592:2001:4858:AAAA:1B:0:0:0:1207
562:16:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
540:17:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
525:20:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
513:14:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
492:00:45, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
734:14:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
431:12:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
402:would ever have existed if
377:and productivity (see e.g.
307:15:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
804:
697:(last update: 5 June 2024)
633:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
239:project's importance scale
144:project's importance scale
600:13:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
254:
232:
181:
137:
78:
57:
572:Please do not modify it.
470:Please do not modify it.
452:11:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
629:External links modified
758:All Computing articles
251:
106:information technology
39:This article is rated
323:neutral point of view
250:
196:WikiProject Microsoft
93:WikiProject Computing
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
678:regular verification
406:hadn't launched the
312:This article should
668:After February 2018
550:Defective by Design
722:InternetArchiveBot
673:InternetArchiveBot
588:Product Activation
252:
219:Microsoft articles
124:Computing articles
45:content assessment
698:
552:not listed here.
515:
514:
434:
417:comment added by
277:
276:
273:
272:
269:
268:
154:
153:
150:
149:
16:(Redirected from
795:
732:
723:
696:
695:
674:
586:Please say that
574:
505:
504:
503:– general name.
472:
433:
411:
404:Richard Stallman
221:
220:
217:
214:
211:
190:
183:
182:
177:
174:
163:
156:
126:
125:
122:
119:
116:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
803:
802:
798:
797:
796:
794:
793:
792:
738:
737:
726:
721:
689:
682:have permission
672:
646:this simple FaQ
631:
607:
584:
579:
570:
468:
462:
412:
400:Knowledge (XXG)
396:writing systems
389:The reason why
318:
292:. Criticism on
282:
218:
215:
212:
209:
208:
175:
169:
123:
120:
117:
114:
113:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
801:
799:
791:
790:
785:
780:
775:
770:
765:
760:
755:
750:
740:
739:
716:
715:
708:
661:
660:
652:Added archive
630:
627:
615:177.126.57.128
606:
603:
583:
580:
578:
577:
566:
565:
564:
543:
542:
476:
475:
463:
461:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
436:
435:
386:
385:
343:
340:
339:
317:
310:
281:
278:
275:
274:
271:
270:
267:
266:
263:Low-importance
253:
243:
242:
235:Low-importance
231:
225:
224:
222:
205:the discussion
191:
179:
178:
176:Low‑importance
164:
152:
151:
148:
147:
140:Low-importance
136:
130:
129:
127:
110:the discussion
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
800:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
761:
759:
756:
754:
751:
749:
746:
745:
743:
736:
735:
730:
725:
724:
713:
709:
706:
702:
701:
700:
693:
687:
683:
679:
675:
669:
664:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
647:
643:
639:
634:
628:
626:
624:
620:
616:
612:
604:
602:
601:
597:
593:
589:
581:
576:
573:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
545:
544:
541:
537:
533:
529:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
517:23.226.70.113
512:
509:
502:
498:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
474:
471:
465:
464:
459:
453:
449:
445:
440:
439:
438:
437:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
409:
405:
401:
397:
392:
388:
387:
383:
380:
379:CompModelsTCO
376:
372:
369:
365:
362:
358:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
338:
334:
330:
326:
324:
315:
311:
309:
308:
304:
300:
295:
294:Windows Vista
291:
287:
279:
264:
261:(assessed as
260:
259:
249:
245:
244:
240:
236:
230:
227:
226:
223:
206:
202:
198:
197:
192:
189:
185:
184:
180:
173:
168:
165:
162:
158:
145:
141:
135:
132:
131:
128:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
18:Talk:BadVista
720:
717:
692:source check
671:
665:
662:
635:
632:
608:
585:
571:
568:
507:
495:
479:
477:
469:
466:
367:
360:
346:Kingoomieiii
327:
319:
313:
283:
256:
234:
194:
139:
91:
51:WikiProjects
554:72.51.41.46
413:—Preceding
408:GNU project
368:large group
361:small group
41:Start-class
742:Categories
729:Report bug
359:Hm... The
316:be removed
286:notability
712:this tool
705:this tool
508:Relisted.
210:Microsoft
201:Microsoft
167:Microsoft
115:Computing
102:computing
98:computers
70:Computing
718:Cheers.—
532:AnonMoos
511:Armbrust
444:Scientus
427:contribs
415:unsigned
391:BadVista
642:my edit
419:Ale2006
366:). The
297:(XXG).
237:on the
172:Windows
142:on the
104:, and
47:scale.
497:BadXP
480:moved
619:talk
596:talk
558:talk
536:talk
521:talk
488:talk
482:. --
460:Move
448:talk
442:has.
423:talk
350:talk
333:talk
303:talk
686:RfC
656:to
582:DRM
484:BDD
375:TCO
329:ale
314:not
299:hAl
229:Low
134:Low
744::
699:.
694:}}
690:{{
625:.
621:)
598:)
560:)
538:)
523:)
506:--
499:→
490:)
450:)
429:)
425:•
352:)
335:)
325:.
305:)
265:).
170::
100:,
731:)
727:(
714:.
707:.
617:(
594:(
556:(
534:(
519:(
486:(
446:(
421:(
384:.
348:(
331:(
301:(
241:.
146:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
