806:
top proves that the "badge man" head top is above the ground some 8', therefore, as seen in the
Moorman #5 polaroid the "badge man" feet if just 0.5' northwest of the picket fence line were elevated above the car parking lot ground (given an average human male height of 5'10"). Because it has been scientifically determined that the "badge man" head top was elevated above the ground some 8', that, of course, then did make it entirely possible for a "badge man" fired bullet to pass above the upper corner of the cement retaining wall. The "badge man" assassin's shot, fired within a micro-second of the HSCA-determined assassin's shot, did not strike President Kennedy. (since the president was facing nearly in profile to the "badge man," if a "badge man" fired bullet had hit the president in the right side of his head, the bullet, most-likely, would have exited on the left half of the president's head). There is evidence of where the "badge man" missed shot went to. On 11-22-63, within an hour of the assassination, Jean Hill, who was very close to the president at 313, stated on tv that some shots were fired from the grassy knoll. Jean Hill further testified to the Warren Commission that on 11-22-63 she was told by one of the "agents" who questioned her and Mary Moorman that a second "agent" -who Hill testified the first agent told her this second "agent" had been stationed in Dealey Plaza- saw a bullet strike close to her feet in the ground and that bullet kicked up debris. (officially, there were no "agents" documented to be stationed in/near Dealey Plaza at any time, even though several other witnesses are documented to have encountered "agent(s)" within Dealey Plaza within 25 minutes of the assassination) The trajectory line of a shot fired from "badge man" just missing President Kennedy from Z-310 to 314, leads directly at the immediate ground surrounding Jean Hill. Additionally, there is
954:
shaded gray. The "badge man" is supposed to be just above the wall, right at that corner. In the image on this page you can make out two white dots a little above this corner and a grayish blob at the top of the right side of the wall. The left white dot is supposed to be the "muzzle flash", and the right white dot is supposed to be the background behind badge man's left shoulder. The lower gray blob is supposed to be the background underneath his left arm. This looks nothing like the "enhanced" badge man photo (not even like the non-colorized one). Note that you can't make out his head, nor the famous "badge". I loaded the image into gimp and raised the brightness to 73 (I don't know what unit this is, it's just what the brightness tool shows) and I could just barely make out what is supposed to be his head. Still no sign of the badge though. It looks nothing like a person, but guess what it does look exactly like... light filtering through tree leaves. Which is exactly what's going on all around that spot. I really don't believe this garbage should be on wikipedia. I thought reliable sources was the name of the game here. Especially that horrendous colorized version. Someone just picked the colors they wanted where they wanted them. You may as well accept someone's original painting as evidence.
666:
most-likely, would have exited on the left half of the president's head). There is evidence of where the "badge man" missed shot went to. On 11-22-63, within an hour of the assassination, Jean Hill, who was very close to the president at 313, stated on tv that some shots were fired from the grassy knoll. Jean Hill further testified to the Warren
Commission that on 11-22-63 she was told by one of the "agents" who questioned her and Mary Moorman that a second "agent" -who Hill testified the first agent told her this second "agent" had been stationed in Dealey Plaza- saw a bullet strike close to her feet in the ground and that bullet kicked up debris. (officially, there were no "agents" documented to be stationed in/near Dealey Plaza at any time, even though several other witnesses are documented to have encountered "agent(s)" within Dealey Plaza within 25 minutes of the assassination) The trajectory line of a shot fired from "badge man" just missing President Kennedy from Z-310 to 314, leads directly at the immediate ground surrounding Jean Hill. Additionally, there is
712:
years), nor have you, apparently, read, and/or you have not comprehended, the acoustics dictabelt tape research from 2001 onward that further supports the second, grassy knoll/picket fence-determined assassin. Here are external links, freely available for all to read and make his/her own determination, to the up-to-date acoustics dictabelt research from 2001 to present that scientifically determines to better than a 95% probability, and further supports the second, grassy/knoll picket fence assassin that was also determined scientifically by the HSCA to a 95% probability:
214:
187:
32:
224:
156:
65:
317:
390:
365:
329:
457:
436:
822:
only a few yards from that fence, would have noticed someone standing eight feet off the ground firing a rifle? Or that Lee Bowers, who had an unobstructed view of the back of the fence from a two-story tower in the parking lot, would have seen this? You have to do a lot of explaining away of other eye- and earwitness testimony to make "Badgeman" possible. —
467:
953:
This was bothering me for longer than it should have. I finally found where he's supposed to be in the larger image. In the center of the image, just up the hill a bit, you'll see the corner of a wall. The left (from our perspective) side of the fence is an over-exposed white, and the right side is a
821:
Isn't it odd that Jim
Garrison didn't use that witness in his trial? Do we have any corroborating evidence that Jim Hicks was in Dealey Plaza that day? Why did no one hear from him before 1968? As for "Badgeman", don't you think witnesses Emmett Hudson, Abraham Zapruder, and Marilyn Sitzman, standing
1019:
Is "unknown" necessary? It begs the question, "Unknown to whom?" The alleged person is unknown to some conspiracists, but other conspiracists believe they know who it is. And given that everyone who thinks it is an actual person also thinks it is an assassin (not just an observer standing behind the
879:
In colorosation I gather the settings of what areas of a B&W image are what particular color are set by an operator. Is this the case? Has the color of that image been absolutely determined by algorithm? The colorisation seems too good to be true; to fit what the coloriser wants to see in the
805:
Not true, Ramsquire. As with most "lone nut" apologists, Ramsquire is not knowledgeable of, and/or, he "forgot" to mention something.... he "forgot" to mention that it has, in fact, been scientifically proven that in the
Moorman polaroid #5 the line-of-sight from Mary Moorman to the "badge man" head
1265:
Bugliosi only states: "But the image of the retaining wall area is so blurred that enlarging the photo and seeking to enhance it at the
Rochester Institute of Technology 'produced no significant increase in detail and no evidence of any human form.' And since the 'fence region of the photograph was
968:
The location of the enlargement area is described in the article text as well as the first photo caption. As for that new enlargement, I've removed it: You can't possibly find the same detail in a JPEG that you can in the original photograph. The Mack/White enlargement comes from that original, and
665:
The "badge man" assassin's shot, fired within a micro-second of the HSCA-determined assassin's shot, did not strike
President Kennedy. (since the president was facing nearly in profile to the "badge man," if a "badge man" fired bullet had hit the president in the right side of his head, the bullet,
711:
Thanks, Gamaleel, for your "lone nut" Warren
Commission apologist opinion. Obviously your (liberally over-emotional) opinion is only a non-neutral opinion, and, just as transparent, you have not kept yourself current with (and/or, you are living in denial about) the research since 1982 (over 23+
786:
I am tempted to add a sentence saying that the purported badge man could not have been "the" assasin since the retaining wall would have blocked him from the
President for that fatal shot. I know some will claim that is POV, but I've been to Dealey Plaza and I can tell you that that shot is
792:
Visitors to Dealey Plaza will quickly realize however that any person standing in the location of "badge man" could not have fired a fatal shot at
President Kennedy, since the retaining wall would block their line of sight. This is so even if the person stands on the bumber of a
749:
Your edit removed some of my earlier comments, which I have restored. I assume this was accidental, but however it happened, please take care not to do this again. If you want a productive discussion, please take a more polite tone with those who disagree with you. Note
938:
I also can't tell where in the picture that section is actually located. Would it be possible for a version of the photo currently in the article to be uploaded pointing out the appropriate section within the picture as a whole....? --
651:
Thanks for the photos. Seems like wiki-software does not display them as clear and crisp as they actually are. In your opinion, IF badgeman was a real assassin who appears to have just fired a shot, do you think that bullet hit JFK?
1109:
Agreed with both here that the wording "an unknown figure" gives off wrong vibes. "figure" as a word can occasionally refer to non-humans or objects, but "unknown" suggests the most common definition (a human silhouette) by way of
850:- She is mildly famous as a witness to the assassination. There is quite a bit of information on her on the Internet. She made statements to the FBI and others about it. She was played by Sally Nystuen in the movie JFK.
765:
Gamaliel, you do agree, do you not, that a "productive discussion," (and by direct inference, productive, accurate
Knowledge (XXG)-disseminated information) also, absolutely, includes discussing and disseminating
1356:
1351:
1014:
The Badge Man is an unknown figure that is purportedly present within the Mary Moorman photograph of the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy in Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963.
1161:
Agree with the removal of "unknown" to describe a purported figure. Besides making the sentence simpler and more direct, it avoids implying there is someone's figure but their identity is unknown.
864:— Mary Moorman was a witness, Badgeman is a theory held by conspiracy theorists. "Badgeman" is not Mary Moorman's theory, it is an inference drawn by others. The two are not joined at the waist. —
1025:
The Badge Man is an assassin that is purportedly present within the Mary Moorman photograph of the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy in Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963.
1003:
126:
46:
1371:
254:
1067:
If that is the impression that most people would receive from my suggestion, then we definitely should not use it! I'm still not sure why we use "unknown" as it implies to me that there
1262:
My understanding is that the original photographs is relatively small (i.e. less than 3" wide), so RIT used the original to make a negative then used the negative to make larger images.
1114:. IMO, it's better to simply state "a figure", which leaves the epistemological burden on conspiracy theorists to prove that it's a human figure. This is also the approach taken by
271:
698:
The idea that the HSCA "scientifically determined to better than a 95% probability" the exact spot of a second shooter based on dubious acoustic evidence is utter nonsense.
1320:
837:
Mary Moorman's only claim to fame is that she has taken a photo that some claim contains Badgeman. It seems fairly obvious to me that a merger would be appropriate here.
71:
1115:
307:
1366:
297:
261:
107:
1391:
523:
266:
396:
370:
810:
from a Dealey Plaza witness that he observed a gunman fire from within the open trunk of a car parked with its trunk up close to the picket fence line.
670:
from a Dealey Plaza witness that he observed a gunman fire from within the open trunk of a car parked with its trunk up close to the picket fence line.
1225:
The HSCA then sent a negative version of the Moorman photo to the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) for enlargement, enhancement, and analysis.
1401:
1361:
513:
1220:
with the note "Did HSCA send a negative or the original positive to RIT?" A few sentence earlier in the paragraph there is a sentence that states:
1002:
Good work on this. I understand that this will be a featured article on May 5, 2023. I did have one more comment that may have been touched on in
1346:
1381:
347:
758:. Comments like "liberally over-emotional" and "living in denial" are unproductive and uncivil. Also, please spell my user name correctly.
237:
192:
1406:
489:
1386:
906:
I can't figure out where in the photo the Badge Man is. Could someone please circle this area with a pen or with software? Thank you.
1396:
249:
969:
the colorized version was White's way of conveying their theory. It's a threadbare theory, perhaps even "garbage", but there it is.
887:
1376:
245:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
755:
480:
441:
167:
1053:
in the photo. I think the first one does a good job of making it clear that even the existence of the badge man is in doubt.
342:
197:
41:
1328:
585:
1313:
1248:
So RIT made a negative copy, but didn't use it in the analysis? I don't have a copy of Bugliosi to check what he says.
807:
683:
667:
579:
Moorman #5 showing inverted shades displaying the evident damage to the head top and head rear of President Kennedy.
1147:
I have removed "unknown" per the above. I assuming doing so may draw others to this thread who will follow WP:BRD. -
64:
604:
1123:
155:
31:
173:
51:
1309:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
692:
Your opinions on this McAdams person are irrelevant and do not belong in this article or in the edit summary.
1324:
974:
929:
891:
883:
401:
375:
1287:
Do you think the tag could be removed or do you think there is still something that needs clarification? -
944:
653:
632:
488:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
751:
1093:
in it. I’d also make it clearer sooner that the consensus amongst experts is there is no such figure.
1166:
229:
55:
1282:
1249:
1231:
1201:
1142:
1119:
811:
775:
740:
642:
617:
1292:
1271:
1253:
1238:
1152:
1076:
1035:
970:
959:
925:
571:
locate, and most will share the details of what he/she saw, heard, felt, touched, and/or smelled.
213:
186:
1045:
Maybe I have a paranoid mindset, but your alternative could be read to mean that The Badge Man
596:
compared to an HSCA shooting recreation recorded in 1978. The HSCA never tested the "badge man"
594:
the HSCA had an 11-22-63 Dallas police motorcycle escort radio tape scientifically analyzed and
567:
the assassination should personally interview the living witnesses. They are relatively easy to
940:
1180:
1058:
911:
1266:
of even poorer quality than the retaining wall area, no enhancement' was even attempted." -
1233:
This seems to me to mean that the HSCA sent the original and that RIT made the negative. -
1162:
1098:
1085:
I’d go further than this: “the badge man is an unknown figure…” emphasises that a figure
554:
do you know where the "badge man" and HSCA-determined grassy knoll assassins were located
715:
624:(left to right, and colorized) supposedly Gordon Arnold filming, "badge man" assassin,
838:
796:
472:
550:
315 to 316 (precisely 315.6), only 0.14 second after President Kennedy's head exploded
1340:
1305:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1288:
1267:
1234:
1148:
1072:
1031:
955:
759:
725:
702:
242:
720:
1211:
The examined photo was the original copy, which had greatly degraded by that point.
865:
823:
730:
559:
Used with the personal permission of Mary Moorman, one of three dozen Dealey Plaza
334:
735:
563:
witnesses I have personally interviewed. Anyone who claims to know anything about
1176:
1134:
1111:
1054:
997:
907:
316:
592:
The HSCA acoustically-determined the location of the grassy knoll assassin when
389:
364:
1138:
1094:
1089:
in the picture. I would say something weaker than this, that such a figure is
851:
462:
324:
219:
17:
921:
684:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style#Use_straight_quotation_marks_and_apostrophes
736:
Dr. Thomas study of the grassy knoll shot, December 2003; Court-tv rebuttal
241:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
456:
435:
1230:
The HSCA report says "a high quality negative copy" was made at the RIT.
695:
This is not the HSCA article and is not the place for their conclusions.
689:
It is rude to accuse another editor of vandalism over a content dispute.
485:
1006:. I am mentioning it here in the event others would like to chime in.
484:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
1332:
1296:
1275:
1257:
1242:
1184:
1170:
1156:
1127:
1102:
1080:
1062:
1039:
978:
963:
948:
933:
915:
895:
868:
854:
841:
826:
598:
location because the "badge man" was not discovered until 1982.
1004:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Badge Man/archive1
149:
682:
There is no reason to restore the old quotation marks. See
315:
1116:
John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories#Badge_man
1357:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1071:
a figure (i.e. person) but we just don't know who it is. -
726:
Dr. Thomas study of the grassy knoll shot, September 2002
611:
The "badge man" cropped, contrasted and brightened only.
731:
Dr. Thomas study of the grassy knoll shot, November 2002
721:
Dr. Thomas study of the grassy knoll shot, November 2001
70:
This article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
1217:
119:
100:
1352:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
716:
Dr. Thomas study of the grassy knoll shot, March 2001
626:
the railroadman construction-hard-hatted accomplice.
1009:
The first sentence of the article currently states:
1372:FA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1118:(and the subsequent section on "Black dog man").
399:, a project which is currently considered to be
587:File:WIKImoormanDIDPmackASSASSINSnoQUESTION.gif
1319:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
411:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth
8:
54:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
50:as one of the best articles produced by the
44:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
548:captured simultaneously with Zapruder frame
902:Where is the "Badge Man in the photograph?
606:File:MOORMANwhiteENHANCEMENT080304crop.gif
430:
359:
181:
79:
26:
1218:you placed a {{clarification needed}} tag
1030:Thoughts? Should I open an Rfc on this? -
631:
616:
603:
584:
282:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1206:At the end of the following sentence...
153:
432:
361:
183:
414:Template:WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth
1367:Low-importance United States articles
7:
808:1968 documented grand jury testimony
668:1968 documented grand jury testimony
639:The "badge man" assassin colorized.
478:This article is within the scope of
395:This article is within the scope of
235:This article is within the scope of
756:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks
498:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History
172:It is of interest to the following
1392:WikiProject United States articles
285:Template:WikiProject United States
25:
1347:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles
465:
455:
434:
388:
363:
327:
222:
212:
185:
154:
63:
30:
1402:Low-importance history articles
1362:FA-Class United States articles
677:Some notes on the latest revert
634:File:MACKwhiteZOOMbmONLYgif.gif
518:This article has been rated as
302:This article has been rated as
875:"Badge man" image colorization
790:Here is a proposed sentence:
1:
1382:Low-importance Texas articles
979:03:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
934:04:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
916:04:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
842:01:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
492:and see a list of open tasks.
397:WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth
340:This article is supported by
1407:WikiProject History articles
964:15:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
949:21:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
501:Template:WikiProject History
1423:
1387:WikiProject Texas articles
1040:15:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
869:04:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
855:03:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
827:05:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
524:project's importance scale
417:Dallas-Fort Worth articles
308:project's importance scale
127:Featured article candidate
1397:FA-Class history articles
896:18:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
799:21:03, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
778:14:04, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
762:01:36, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
645:18:17, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
619:File:MACKwhiteZOOMgif.gif
517:
450:
383:
323:
301:
238:WikiProject United States
207:
180:
140:
82:
78:
52:Knowledge (XXG) community
752:Knowledge (XXG):Civility
705:00:57, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
656:20:18, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
243:United States of America
72:Today's featured article
1377:FA-Class Texas articles
1333:11:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1297:17:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1276:16:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1258:13:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1243:05:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1185:01:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
1171:17:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1157:16:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1128:07:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1103:05:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1081:05:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
1063:03:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
814:00:04, 29 Jan 2005(UTC)
743:00:04, 29 Jan 2005(UTC)
546:The Moorman #5 polaroid
320:
288:United States articles
162:This article is rated
1314:Badgeman coloured.jpg
991:Introductory sentence
319:
166:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
108:Articles for deletion
230:United States portal
1020:fence), I propose:
772:documented evidence
481:WikiProject History
256:Articles Requested!
1325:Community Tech bot
321:
168:content assessment
83:Article milestones
898:
886:comment added by
538:
537:
534:
533:
530:
529:
429:
428:
425:
424:
408:Dallas-Fort Worth
371:Dallas-Fort Worth
358:
357:
354:
353:
343:WikiProject Texas
148:
147:
136:
135:
101:November 23, 2010
16:(Redirected from
1414:
1286:
1205:
1146:
1049:an assassin who
1001:
924:, more or less.
881:
637:
635:
622:
620:
609:
607:
590:
588:
506:
505:
504:history articles
502:
499:
496:
475:
470:
469:
468:
459:
452:
451:
446:
438:
431:
419:
418:
415:
412:
409:
392:
385:
384:
379:
367:
360:
337:
332:
331:
330:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
232:
227:
226:
225:
216:
209:
208:
203:
200:
189:
182:
165:
159:
158:
150:
143:Featured article
141:Current status:
122:
103:
80:
67:
42:featured article
34:
27:
21:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1337:
1336:
1321:nomination page
1307:
1280:
1199:
1197:
1132:
995:
993:
904:
877:
835:
784:
782:Question of POV
770:of the related
679:
633:
618:
605:
586:
543:
503:
500:
497:
494:
493:
471:
466:
464:
444:
416:
413:
410:
407:
406:
373:
333:
328:
326:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
276:
262:Become a Member
228:
223:
221:
201:
195:
163:
118:
99:
74:on May 5, 2023.
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1420:
1418:
1410:
1409:
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1374:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1339:
1338:
1317:
1316:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1278:
1263:
1228:
1227:
1216:...I saw that
1214:
1213:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1173:
1143:Ceconhistorian
1120:Ceconhistorian
1107:
1106:
1105:
1083:
1028:
1027:
1017:
1016:
992:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
903:
900:
876:
873:
872:
871:
858:
857:
834:
831:
830:
829:
818:
817:
816:
815:
783:
780:
747:
746:
745:
744:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
700:
699:
696:
693:
690:
687:
678:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
658:
657:
638:
625:
623:
610:
597:
595:
593:
591:
578:
569:
565:
560:
557:
551:
549:
542:
539:
536:
535:
532:
531:
528:
527:
520:Low-importance
516:
510:
509:
507:
490:the discussion
477:
476:
473:History portal
460:
448:
447:
445:Low‑importance
439:
427:
426:
423:
422:
420:
393:
381:
380:
368:
356:
355:
352:
351:
348:Low-importance
339:
338:
322:
312:
311:
304:Low-importance
300:
294:
293:
291:
275:
274:
269:
264:
259:
252:
250:Template Usage
246:
234:
233:
217:
205:
204:
202:Low‑importance
190:
178:
177:
171:
160:
146:
145:
138:
137:
134:
133:
130:
123:
120:March 24, 2023
115:
114:
111:
104:
96:
95:
92:
89:
85:
84:
76:
75:
68:
60:
59:
35:
24:
18:Talk:Badge man
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1419:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1370:
1368:
1365:
1363:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1342:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1304:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1284:
1279:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1226:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1219:
1212:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1194:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1005:
999:
990:
980:
976:
972:
971:SteveStrummer
967:
966:
965:
961:
957:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
937:
936:
935:
931:
927:
926:SteveStrummer
923:
920:
919:
918:
917:
913:
909:
901:
899:
897:
893:
889:
885:
874:
870:
867:
863:
860:
859:
856:
853:
849:
846:
845:
844:
843:
840:
832:
828:
825:
820:
819:
813:
809:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
798:
794:
788:
781:
779:
777:
773:
769:
763:
761:
757:
753:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
704:
697:
694:
691:
688:
685:
681:
680:
676:
669:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
655:
654:205.188.117.9
650:
649:
648:
646:
644:
640:
636:
629:
627:
621:
614:
612:
608:
601:
599:
589:
582:
580:
575:
573:
572:
568:
564:
561:
555:
547:
540:
525:
521:
515:
512:
511:
508:
491:
487:
483:
482:
474:
463:
461:
458:
454:
453:
449:
443:
440:
437:
433:
421:
404:
403:
398:
394:
391:
387:
386:
382:
377:
372:
369:
366:
362:
349:
346:(assessed as
345:
344:
336:
325:
318:
314:
313:
309:
305:
299:
296:
295:
292:
279:United States
273:
270:
268:
265:
263:
260:
258:
257:
253:
251:
248:
247:
244:
240:
239:
231:
220:
218:
215:
211:
210:
206:
199:
194:
193:United States
191:
188:
184:
179:
175:
169:
161:
157:
152:
151:
144:
139:
131:
129:
128:
124:
121:
117:
116:
112:
110:
109:
105:
102:
98:
97:
93:
90:
87:
86:
81:
77:
73:
69:
66:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
48:
43:
39:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1318:
1308:
1229:
1224:
1215:
1210:
1198:
1163:- LuckyLouie
1090:
1086:
1068:
1050:
1046:
1029:
1024:
1018:
1013:
1008:
994:
941:ChrisTheDude
905:
878:
861:
847:
836:
791:
789:
787:impossible.
785:
771:
767:
764:
748:
701:
659:
647:
641:
630:
628:
615:
613:
602:
600:
583:
581:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
553:
545:
544:
519:
479:
400:
341:
335:Texas portal
303:
267:Project Talk
255:
236:
174:WikiProjects
142:
125:
106:
56:please do so
45:
37:
1175:I like it,
1112:implicature
888:92.3.188.27
882:—Preceding
1341:Categories
1091:supposedly
922:This is it
47:identified
839:JChap2007
797:Ramsquire
774:, right?
38:Badge Man
1289:Location
1283:GA-RT-22
1268:Location
1250:GA-RT-22
1235:Location
1202:GA-RT-22
1149:Location
1073:Location
1032:Location
956:Onlynone
884:unsigned
880:image.
862:Disagree
848:Disagree
812:Badgeman
776:Badgeman
760:Gamaliel
741:Badgeman
703:Gamaliel
643:Badgeman
541:Untitled
402:inactive
376:inactive
164:FA-class
132:Promoted
1141:, and
866:Walloon
824:Walloon
522:on the
495:History
486:History
442:History
306:on the
91:Process
1177:Rjjiii
1135:Rjjiii
1055:Rjjiii
1051:may be
998:HAL333
908:Risssa
833:Merger
272:Alerts
170:scale.
94:Result
1139:FOARP
1095:FOARP
852:Fanra
198:Texas
40:is a
1329:talk
1293:talk
1272:talk
1254:talk
1239:talk
1181:talk
1167:talk
1153:talk
1124:talk
1099:talk
1077:talk
1059:talk
1036:talk
975:talk
960:talk
945:talk
930:talk
912:talk
892:talk
754:and
113:Kept
88:Date
1323:. —
1195:Tag
793:car
768:ALL
514:Low
298:Low
1343::
1331:)
1295:)
1274:)
1256:)
1241:)
1183:)
1169:)
1155:)
1137:,
1126:)
1101:)
1087:is
1079:)
1069:is
1061:)
1047:is
1038:)
977:)
962:)
947:)
932:)
914:)
894:)
556:?)
350:).
196::
1327:(
1291:(
1285::
1281:@
1270:(
1252:(
1237:(
1204::
1200:@
1179:(
1165:(
1151:(
1145::
1133:@
1122:(
1097:(
1075:(
1057:(
1034:(
1000::
996:@
973:(
958:(
943:(
928:(
910:(
890:(
795:.
686:.
577:]
552:(
526:.
405:.
378:)
374:(
310:.
176::
58:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
-logo-v2.svg.png){kind=logo}
