1029:
nominator (your own). Then by efforts to deliberately misinform the debate with clearly factually incorrect arguments on which others based uninformed "per x" opinions. The keep crowd did an excellent job of shifting the goal-posts and playing the man instead of the ball. Rather than re-listing something for which there were three possible outcomes, the closer closed it with what he had. The fault lies with the participants, not the closer, so DRV would be a pointless exercise. The only "disruption" here is the attempt to road-block further discussion with straw man nonsense. As I said on your talk page, Tim, I expected better from you.
651:
Again, there is no "rage". There is, however, a long term and collegial effort to up-merge diplomati-stubs to ensure that bilateral relations are covered appropriately without hundreds of articles covering the minutiae of global diplomacy (including individual signs on doors, offices within offices within offices and synthesised relationships). It is equal part creation and deletion, as evidenced by those articles I've created and those I've fought to save. Childishly lumping "you guys" into a group doesn't make your commentary any less oafish or ill-thought-through.
602:
facts, nor my legitimate concern about them. I have no particular desire to see it deleted for the sake of deleting it and have created a number of similar articles in the past. While I agreed with the nominator in this instance, there are plenty of occasions where he and I have disagreed and we have remained frequent participants in bilateral relations AFDs since a collective effort a couple of years ago to remove a bunch of COI promo-spam. Again, I haven't nominated it once so the suggestion that I "keep taking it to AFD" is spurious ad-hom.
368:
358:
331:
134:
113:
144:
434:
82:
21:
560:) should be glued together to make a notable whole is plainly non-policy. The addition of non-assertions ("there is not bilateral agreement" and "these two countries are both part of broad groups with dozens of others") doesn't make this subject any more notable. The "keep" arguments at AFD prevailed because they played the man rather than the ball.
1174:
484:
466:
636:
notable, but the notability was addressed at the AFD. I understand the rage you feel, why don't you guys give it a rest and nominate a third time in a few months, instead of the death by 1,000 cuts approach. I am sure if you keep at it you can get it deleted. Persistence usually wins at deletions. Cheers. --
834:
Except the absence of a standard diplomatic milestone is not the same as random infrastructure in a city. We also include that they have no resident ambassadors. Take it to the standard third opinion route and see what other people think. This is an almanac type entry, people are looking for what the
964:
I hesitate to wade into what's looking like an edit war in the brewing; but I added that statement to begin with because I felt it was important to note that they don't have any bilateral treaties with one another to avoid giving the impression that their relationship is more formalized than it is.
816:
Why is this sentence even required. It is no different from having a citation that a town does not have a hospital or airport. It is really scraping the barrel to add such content to pad out an article. perhaps users should put on their user page. User X is not a doctor, solider, policeman, nurse. I
745:
I agree, so I don't understand why you referred to one thing I've never done, suggested I'd do it again and called it mathematics. You now seem to be arguing with yourself. They weren't the same changes, they weren't at the same time and I think you know you've made yourself look incredibly foolish.
1062:
The community has spoken and the war was lost -- twice -- during the past year. The community consensus is that the article meets the
Knowledge notability standard. Instead of accepting consensus, the same two editors who are the only ones to challenge this consensus are fighting the same battle in
635:
story, sometimes the absence of something is important. This is not something random like the absence of a hockey team, it is the basis of most diplomatic articles. I also removed the rage tags again. The notability was upheld at the AFD. I am sorry it still sticks in your craw that you find it not
790:
They weren't consecutive - your edit came between them, as did your first confused comment here (crediting me with another editor's actions). You tried to clumsily lump the two matters together in your second comment. The same misdirection/misinformation occurred at AFD. The second matter is now,
650:
No, you have no right to remove legitimate tags from articles, especially given you seem to have no interest in discussing the issues. You clearly didn't look at who you were addressing your comments to, shot from the hip and now you're doubling-down in an effort to shout away dissent. Nice try.
601:
They aren't "rage tags", I didn't take it to AFD, and your removal of those tags was inappropriate. The discussion at AFD was trending toward "merge" anyway and the closer closed it rather than actually considering the content of the discussion. That's a matter for him, but it doesn't change the
1028:
No, the first AFD was closed by a non-admin on the basis of unchallenged opinions that have since been comprehensively debunked. The second was disrupted by plainly silly suggestions that nominating something 12 months after an initial nomination was disruptive. Then by baseless attacks on the
1085:
An effort to discuss this amicably is being disrupted by the same two editors who disrupted the AFD. We've not challenged the consensus, we're being prevented from raising entirely different issues. The DRV red-herring is a lovely side-track and talk of "wars" and "battle" is unhelpful.
901:
The two countries also do not have joint military operations, a free trade agreement, ongoing cultural or literary relations, religious ties or anything resembling a notable relationship like those other articles where such a notable relationship has been substantiated and
932:
A lack of migration, needs to be added and cited too. We could really pad out this article with a lot of lack of. I remember
Richard norton really opposed Estonia-Luxembourg being deleted. to think we could have a 20 sentence article based on what they don't have!
771:
The conversation isn't always about you, I am addressing more than one person. "Consecutively" is not a synonym for "at the same time". Consecutive events occur one after the other, not at the same time. I'm not really following your logic, can you restate it?
578:
I removed your rage tags, these issues were settled at the AFD. Keep taking it to AFD until you get the outcome you want. Eventually you will get it deleted. The beauty of deletion is that no one will ever see the article again, and though we all agree that
51:
1012:
As everyone should note, notability of this topic is decided, it has passed
Articles for Deletion twice. Stop disrupting Knowledge to make a point. If you feel something was wrongly decided here, Deletion Review is thattaway... ---:
41:
948:
it is a milestone in an actor's career to get an academy award. Richard, could you please to add to every actor who has an article if they haven't won an academy award. This information is useful and adds to notability.
61:
1278:
524:
283:
530:
1283:
1273:
272:
500:
297:
1047:
I'm surprised
Carrite didn't use the imaginary criterion that since Bangladesh has more than 150 million it therefore has automatic notability with other nations.
719:
One data point is not a trend in mathematics, even if it is the last data point. "You guys" is a term to address the two people who made changes consecutively. --
965:
From my research and from the sources cited in the article, this is still a very informal relationship in its infancy. Noting that, although there have been talk
491:
471:
1233:
200:
190:
853:
of agreements to all bilaterals where it applies. I feel it is more a desperate bid to pad articles rather than focus on evidence of actual relations.
973:
of the relationship, I was trying to emphasize the importance of the fact that the relationship between the two countries is informal. Make sense? ~
969:, there are no treaties, avoids creating misconceptions among readers. (which is also why I used the word "notably" - I was not trying to assert the
1238:
1228:
840:
777:
724:
681:
641:
588:
258:
1130:
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add
1258:
1248:
448:
424:
414:
166:
1268:
1263:
1253:
1243:
836:
773:
720:
677:
637:
584:
1063:
the same article all over again. If there are issues with the AfDs and/or the manner in which either of them was closed, take it to
390:
552:
Despite the unverified assertions and personal attacks against the nominator in the most recent AFD, the article remains a mess of
157:
118:
1115:
849:
airports and hospitals are not random infrastructure but signs of a town's level of development. Are you now going to add
1067:
and make your case. Raising this all over again to refight the war that's already been lost appears plainly disruptive.
443:
381:
341:
336:
251:
93:
244:
27:
81:
992:
it's padding at best, you don't need to state the lack of agreements in bilaterals for reasons stated above.
496:
694:
It is when it's directed at the wrong target because you didn't take the time to read things thoroughly.
1206:
1186:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
99:
1138:
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
1164:
970:
583:, it can only change if people look at the article. Once deleted no one looks at it again. Cheers. --
20:
1214:
1143:
1098:
1076:
1056:
1041:
1022:
1001:
986:
958:
942:
918:
880:
862:
844:
826:
803:
781:
758:
728:
706:
685:
663:
645:
614:
592:
572:
499:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
389:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
165:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1072:
357:
330:
1187:
1125:
1052:
1018:
997:
954:
938:
876:
858:
822:
149:
1202:
1088:
1031:
982:
908:
793:
748:
696:
653:
604:
562:
279:
1194:
556:. The suggestion that a couple of disparate events (that wouldn't meet the requirements of
1133:
628:
557:
553:
975:
262:
1193:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1222:
1068:
1064:
373:
1048:
1014:
993:
950:
934:
872:
854:
818:
812:
As of 2015 Rwanda and
Bangadesh do not have any bilateral treaties with one another
632:
133:
112:
903:
307:
363:
268:
162:
139:
433:
30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
627:
I have restored that they do not have any current bilateral treaties. Like
676:"keep taking it to AFD is spurious ad-hom", No it is just mathematics. --
290:
1181:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
386:
1144:
http://www.newagebd.com/detail.php?date=2012-05-17&nid=10566
483:
465:
75:
15:
1149:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
432:
1114:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1119:
235:
230:
225:
220:
495:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
385:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
161:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1279:
306:Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to
529:This article has not yet received a rating on the
835:countries have and do not have diplomatically. --
791:quite rightly, the subject of its own thread.
509:Knowledge:WikiProject International relations
8:
1284:WikiProject International relations articles
1274:Start-Class International relations articles
512:Template:WikiProject International relations
79:
460:
325:
208:
107:
817:can't deduce this looking at user pages.
259:History of Bangladesh after independence
462:
327:
109:
1161:to let others know (documentation at
7:
489:This article is within the scope of
379:This article is within the scope of
155:This article is within the scope of
1008:Notability on this topic is decided
492:WikiProject International relations
98:It is of interest to the following
1234:Low-importance Bangladesh articles
282:back to FA as it was demoted (see
271:back to FA as it was demoted (see
212:WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:
14:
1118:. Please take a moment to review
1172:
515:International relations articles
482:
464:
366:
356:
329:
175:Knowledge:WikiProject Bangladesh
142:
132:
111:
80:
19:
1239:WikiProject Bangladesh articles
1229:Start-Class Bangladesh articles
419:This article has been rated as
195:This article has been rated as
178:Template:WikiProject Bangladesh
26:This article was nominated for
1259:Low-importance Rwanda articles
1249:Low-importance Africa articles
1142:Attempted to fix sourcing for
906:. We should mention that too.
837:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
774:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
721:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
678:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
638:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
585:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
1:
503:and see a list of open tasks.
441:This article is supported by
393:and see a list of open tasks.
169:and see a list of open tasks.
1099:20:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1077:17:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1057:12:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1042:11:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1023:11:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
1002:22:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
987:19:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
959:08:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
943:07:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
919:06:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
881:06:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
867:you should also reference a
863:06:37, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
845:06:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
827:06:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
804:08:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
782:07:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
759:06:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
729:06:33, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
707:06:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
686:06:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
664:06:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
646:06:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
615:06:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
593:02:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
573:23:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
399:Knowledge:WikiProject Africa
252:Climate change in Bangladesh
1269:WikiProject Africa articles
1264:WikiProject Rwanda articles
1254:Start-Class Rwanda articles
1244:Start-Class Africa articles
1116:Bangladesh–Rwanda relations
402:Template:WikiProject Africa
1300:
1215:11:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
1136:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1111:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
531:project's importance scale
425:project's importance scale
303:Make a MRT line 3 article.
201:project's importance scale
528:
477:
440:
418:
351:
245:Bangladesh Liberation War
207:
194:
127:
106:
548:Notability and synthesis
254:, it needs a lot of work
50:, 23 December 2014, see
1107:External links modified
506:International relations
497:International relations
472:International relations
60:, 22 January 2014, see
40:, 31 January 2015, see
437:
158:WikiProject Bangladesh
88:This article is rated
436:
581:consensus can change
1153:parameter below to
296:Take a look at the
243:Add more images to
181:Bangladesh articles
444:WikiProject Rwanda
438:
382:WikiProject Africa
298:requested articles
94:content assessment
1213:
985:
871:of state visits.
545:
544:
541:
540:
537:
536:
459:
458:
455:
454:
324:
323:
320:
319:
316:
315:
293:and related pages
247:and related pages
150:Bangladesh portal
74:
73:
70:
69:
1291:
1209:
1208:Talk to my owner
1204:
1179:
1176:
1175:
1168:
1137:
1129:
1095:
1093:
1038:
1036:
981:
978:
915:
913:
800:
798:
755:
753:
703:
701:
660:
658:
611:
609:
569:
567:
517:
516:
513:
510:
507:
486:
479:
478:
468:
461:
407:
406:
403:
400:
397:
376:
371:
370:
369:
360:
353:
352:
347:
344:
333:
326:
280:Bengali language
209:
183:
182:
179:
176:
173:
152:
147:
146:
145:
136:
129:
128:
123:
115:
108:
91:
85:
84:
76:
32:
31:
23:
16:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1219:
1218:
1212:
1207:
1177:
1173:
1162:
1131:
1123:
1109:
1091:
1089:
1034:
1032:
1010:
983:problem solving
976:
911:
909:
814:
796:
794:
751:
749:
699:
697:
656:
654:
629:Sherlock Holmes
607:
605:
565:
563:
550:
514:
511:
508:
505:
504:
405:Africa articles
404:
401:
398:
395:
394:
372:
367:
365:
345:
339:
240:
180:
177:
174:
171:
170:
148:
143:
141:
121:
92:on Knowledge's
89:
12:
11:
5:
1297:
1295:
1287:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1221:
1220:
1205:
1199:
1198:
1191:
1147:
1146:
1122:. You may add
1108:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1080:
1079:
1045:
1044:
1009:
1006:
1005:
1004:
962:
961:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
921:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
813:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
785:
784:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
712:
711:
710:
709:
689:
688:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
620:
619:
618:
617:
596:
595:
549:
546:
543:
542:
539:
538:
535:
534:
527:
521:
520:
518:
501:the discussion
487:
475:
474:
469:
457:
456:
453:
452:
449:Low-importance
439:
429:
428:
421:Low-importance
417:
411:
410:
408:
391:the discussion
378:
377:
361:
349:
348:
346:Low‑importance
334:
322:
321:
318:
317:
314:
313:
312:
311:
304:
301:
294:
287:
276:
265:
255:
248:
239:
238:
233:
228:
223:
217:
214:
213:
205:
204:
197:Low-importance
193:
187:
186:
184:
167:the discussion
154:
153:
137:
125:
124:
122:Low‑importance
116:
104:
103:
97:
86:
72:
71:
68:
67:
66:
65:
55:
45:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1296:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1224:
1217:
1216:
1210:
1203:
1196:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1170:
1166:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1145:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1127:
1121:
1117:
1112:
1106:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1043:
1040:
1039:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
979:
972:
971:WP:notability
968:
960:
956:
952:
947:
946:
945:
944:
940:
936:
920:
917:
916:
905:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
865:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
847:
846:
842:
838:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
811:
805:
802:
801:
789:
788:
787:
786:
783:
779:
775:
770:
769:
760:
757:
756:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
730:
726:
722:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
708:
705:
704:
693:
692:
691:
690:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:
665:
662:
661:
649:
648:
647:
643:
639:
634:
630:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
616:
613:
612:
600:
599:
598:
597:
594:
590:
586:
582:
577:
576:
575:
574:
571:
570:
559:
555:
547:
532:
526:
523:
522:
519:
502:
498:
494:
493:
488:
485:
481:
480:
476:
473:
470:
467:
463:
450:
447:(assessed as
446:
445:
435:
431:
430:
426:
422:
416:
413:
412:
409:
392:
388:
384:
383:
375:
374:Africa portal
364:
362:
359:
355:
354:
350:
343:
338:
335:
332:
328:
309:
305:
302:
299:
295:
292:
288:
285:
281:
277:
274:
270:
266:
264:
260:
256:
253:
249:
246:
242:
241:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
218:
216:
215:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
192:
189:
188:
185:
168:
164:
160:
159:
151:
140:
138:
135:
131:
130:
126:
120:
117:
114:
110:
105:
101:
95:
87:
83:
78:
77:
63:
59:
56:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1200:
1180:
1171:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1148:
1113:
1110:
1087:
1046:
1030:
1011:
974:
966:
963:
931:
907:
868:
850:
815:
792:
747:
695:
652:
633:Silver Blaze
603:
580:
561:
551:
490:
442:
420:
380:
196:
156:
100:WikiProjects
57:
47:
37:
1165:Sourcecheck
308:New Eskaton
261:, it needs
90:Start-class
1223:Categories
284:discussion
273:discussion
269:Bangladesh
172:Bangladesh
163:Bangladesh
119:Bangladesh
62:discussion
52:discussion
42:discussion
1195:this tool
1188:this tool
977:ONUnicorn
554:synthesis
257:Clean up
250:Clean up
1201:Cheers.—
1126:cbignore
1069:Alansohn
904:verified
558:WP:EVENT
291:Bengalis
289:Improve
278:Improve
267:Improve
28:deletion
1211::Online
1151:checked
1120:my edit
1049:LibStar
1015:Carrite
994:LibStar
951:LibStar
935:LibStar
873:LibStar
855:LibStar
851:absence
819:LibStar
631:in the
423:on the
226:history
199:on the
1159:failed
1134:nobots
1065:WP:DRV
396:Africa
387:Africa
342:Rwanda
337:Africa
96:scale.
1094:lwart
1037:lwart
914:lwart
799:lwart
754:lwart
702:lwart
659:lwart
610:lwart
568:lwart
236:purge
231:watch
1155:true
1073:talk
1053:talk
1019:talk
998:talk
955:talk
939:talk
877:talk
869:lack
859:talk
841:talk
823:talk
778:talk
725:talk
682:talk
642:talk
589:talk
263:NPOV
221:edit
58:Keep
48:Keep
38:Keep
1169:).
1157:or
1013:-->
525:???
415:Low
191:Low
1225::
1167:}}
1163:{{
1132:{{
1128:}}
1124:{{
1090:St
1075:)
1055:)
1033:St
1021:)
1000:)
957:)
941:)
910:St
879:)
861:)
843:)
825:)
795:St
780:)
772:--
750:St
727:)
698:St
684:)
655:St
644:)
606:St
591:)
564:St
451:).
340::
1197:.
1190:.
1178:Y
1092:★
1071:(
1051:(
1035:★
1017:(
996:(
967:s
953:(
937:(
912:★
875:(
857:(
839:(
821:(
797:★
776:(
752:★
723:(
700:★
680:(
657:★
640:(
608:★
587:(
566:★
533:.
427:.
310:.
300:.
286:)
275:)
203:.
102::
64:.
54:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
