Talk:Bareunmirae Party

1859:

quotation marks as a search operator to specify only results for the exact phrases “Bareunmirae Party,” “Bareun Mirae Party,” and “Bareun Future Party,” Bareunmirae is the most often used and Bareun Future the least common. You can also clearly see that Bareunmirae has established itself as the dominant form over time as major sources (such as Yonhap, which is essentially Korea’s equivalent of Reuters or AP) adopted it as their preferred form after previously having had either another or no preferred form when the party first appeared on the scene. This is similar to how some major English-language sources used “Righteous Party” before “Bareun Party” became the preferred form.”

2020:- my opinion in the previous discussion was that there was not yet consensus among English-language sources about the less-than-one-month-old (at the time) party and so no opinion could be formed, but in the past two months this has evidently skewed toward predominant use of the proposed title (the organization's stated official name). In situations such as these, we would only prefer the translated English title if that title was quite significantly predominant in English sources over the official title. An example of that is 1930:'s position, but I don't believe his assertions are in evidence. If you go to the Korea Herald's website, a quick search shows that they have used all three names at various points in time; they have used "Bareun Mirae Party" six times since the beginning of March, "Bareun Future Party" seven times since the beginning of March, and "Bareunmirae Party" 19 times since the beginning of March. UPI and the Straits Times have not mentioned the party very many times, but UPI has used "Bareunmirae Party" most often and in 1855:“Bareunmirae Party” is favored over “Bareun Mirae Party” and “Bareun Future Party” by wire services including Agence France-Presse (AFP), United Press International (UPI), and Korea’s own Yonhap News Agency. It is also favored by the Korea Herald, Korea JoongAng Daily, KBS World, Korea Bizwire, The Diplomat, the South China Morning Post, the Japan Times, and the Straits Times. These are major English-language sources from within Korea, from its neighboring countries, and from countries outside the region. 285: 1404:, that "Knowledge does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title" (which has been made clear to you at least six times already). Thirdly, that "statement" you gave us, how are we to confirm its veracity? Anyone could have made it up in a desperate attempt to shore up their arguments. It's unsourced. Besides that, the "statement" still doesn't change the fact that we don't necessarily use the official name here on Knowledge. 1938:. I could go on, but I think it should be clear that Kiteinthewind's argument that "There appears to be a consensus, even within Korea, to use 'Bareun Future' when referring to the party in English" is not correct. My original reasoning for having the article title be "Bareunmirae Party" was that the article title should reflect the “version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language,” in accordance with 201: 183: 211: 155: 33: 1978:

times since the beginning of March. I would continue to argue that the existence of sparse usage of "Bareun Future Party" should not be used as a justification to displace the most common usage, "Bareunmirae Party," on Knowledge — much in the same way that the less common, but still existing, use of "New Frontier Party" should not displace the more common "Saenuri Party" on Knowledge.

85: 64: 515: 590: 370:, it has been established that "The title used in reliable English-language sources both inside and outside the political party's country (in scholarly works and in the news media), should be preferred." Therefore, under convention, the page's name should be Bareun Future Party. It is for that same reason why 1912:

also used "Bareun Future" within the past month alone. There appears to be a consensus, even within Korea, to use "Bareun Future" when referring to the party in English. In addition, it has not been established, by any stretch of imagination, that "Bareunmirae" is the official name. It was only based

1721:

I'm going to impart you with something an editor here told me a long time ago (edited to fit this situation): You seem to think you can browbeat, accuse, and insult whoever you like. When you've apologized to everyone else you insulted, you might be in a better position to lambast others. Until then,

1977:

I believe this discussion is one worth having, even if the verdict is to again wait to change the name. If one looks to Yonhap, you can see that they have used "Bareun Mirae Party" once since the beginning of March, "Bareun Future Party" twice since the beginning of March, and "Bareunmirae Party" 42

1967:

The opening of yet another divisive move discussion, merely weeks after the last one, is counterproductive and definitely out-of-process. The last debate resulted in a "No Move" verdict, and we were told to wait before talking about it again. To circumvent that discussion with yet another discussion

1799:

See enough agreement in this discussion to go ahead and rename this article. Along with the opposer, I first thought this debate should be "procedurally closed" as out-of-process. However after reading the supporting nomination and the rationales of the supporters, I began to see the good in having

1862:

There is also a precedent for naming articles on South Korean political parties with their Romanized names (as opposed to their translated ones) so long as they are the most commonly used forms. This has been true with the Saenuri Party, from which many of the Bareunmirae Party’s members defected,

1048:

English-language sources both inside and outside the political party's country (in scholarly works and in the news media), should be preferred. Parties whose names are always kept in one language in a multilingual country also are commonly referred to by their native title in English, and so those

1453:

The official English name of South Korea is not "Daehan Minguk". And until now, regretfully all articles for Korean political parties on English Wikipeida are following this rule. (in other words, "official English name" became "commons name".) For this, see Saenuri Party, Minjoo Party and Bareun

1619:

shows the user’s unwillingness to assume good faith, railroading the concensus, blatant nationalism, and -icing on the cake- threat to revert all his edits when he was first banned in 2013. The user’s recent conflicts with other users in English Knowledge has shown that he has not changed a bit.

1501:

First, South Korea use the Hangeul, not English alphabet. So, "Daehan Minguk" is not correct. Second, Saenuri, Minjoo and Bareun are official names, and it is became common names. I think you still cannot recognize "Hangeul" or "Korean". And I already suggested to you for it. And until now, Some

1866:

On top of that, if you look, you can see that major English-language sources, such as the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, use both “Saenuri Party” and “New Frontier Party”—yet the presence of the alternative English translation does not in itself result in deferring or defaulting to the

1128:

the title ought to be the most English name that's in common use by English-language sources, which is the current title. The problem with this discussion is lack of coverage of this new, minor party among sources outside of Asia, so there's just not that much conclusive evidence to go on. The

1603:

It does appear we are encountering the same problems here with Garam. I put the log page (link above) through Google Translate, and it appears Garam has been blocked three times (and for significant periods at a time) on kowiki since 2012 for "personal attacks", "non-collaborative attitudes",

1858:

In a previous discussion on moving the page, the number of Google News results for Bareun Future Party was cited, but if one looks deeper, you’ll notice that many of those results are actually false positives popping up for the Bareun Party, a predecessor to Bareunmirae. Moreover, if you use

1693:

Don't cross you? Everyone is held to the same rules on Knowledge. Your behavior on other Wiki projects is certainly impeachable, and we are going to talk about this, because you are carrying over your behaviors from another part of the Knowledge group of sites onto this edition of Knowledge.

1617: 597: 1662:: What is "blatant nationalism"? In other words, where is "nationalism" in here? It is only your opinion. And I think you can't recognize "Hangeul" or "Korean". So, please stop dogmatic opinion. And I think you have repeatedly and intentionally ignored my points above. 1356:, if we don't know official name of this party, we shouldn't think name of this political party is not simply this or not now. Because this is a newly founded political party in South Korea, and it may take some time until the English language name is settled. 1892:. The consensus was not to move in a debate that happened within the past two months. The admin who closed the debate said we need to wait for a much longer time before we approach the issue again. Also, KH does not favor the name Bareunmirae Party. In fact, 1946:

form of the party's name in major English-language sources. One last (minor) note, I also want to clarify and reiterate that in the first paragraph of my reasoning, I stated that the party's official name is not what's important under

1005:). This is proof that Bareun Future remains in use. Since the word "Mirae" makes no sense in English, I recommend we stick to the current system, where the other name is listed in the article, but is not the article title itself. 519: 1313:, and there's enough use of "Bareun Future" where the "translation rarely used" protocol comes nowhere near being applicable. No matter what, I will oppose the renaming, but I will let other genuine, non-canvassed users decide. 968:

Recently, as I said, the name spelling "Bareunmirae Party" (and "Bareun Mirae Party; two terms is same in Korean lanuage) is continue to increasing rather than "Bareun Future Party" in English news since February 22, 2018. See

1483:

on Knowledge, and not Republic of Korea, Daehan Minguk, or anything other than "South Korea", thus, your argument is invalid. Also, official names don't necessarily matter. Also, asking for the party's name in English is an

1871:

does not call for only using English article titles but instead for whichever article title best reflects the “version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language.” This is “Bareunmirae Party.”

1124:- what I'm seeing is there doesn't seem to be any consistency among the various reliable English-language sources as to which name to use to refer to the party - even individual publications go back and forth. As such per 1014:

Well, you said to me for this party's name on Yophap last time. Now, Yonhap is using the name "Bareunmirae Party". And from what you say, not only "Mirae", but "Bareun" also don't have any meanings in English language.

522:

turned up only four hits. There is a consensus internationally, it appears, to use Bareun Future. Also, citing the official party website is, in and of itself, a Knowledge rules violation, as it is clearly stated, in

576: 898:: Since February 22, 2018, English news using the spelling "Bareunmirae Party" for the name this party, such as "Yonhap" ─ who is similar to "AP" in South Korea ─. Please check the date of recent news on Yonhap 529:

Knowledge does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable

1852:

is the “title used in reliable English-language sources both inside and outside the political party's country.” Under that standard, “Bareunmirae Party” remains the proper form for use on Knowledge.

1968:

is fruitless, in my opinion, especially when it has been proven (by Cjeongbis himself/herself, no less) that there is still no commonly accepted term for this party amongst certain publications.

416:

Interesting discussion below – perhaps in a year or so when the situation isn't so "recent", circumstances may change enough to approach this subject again. Time will tell (and time also heals).

1179:

Yes, I see that, but because there's no consensus it's my opinion that the English word "Future" is preferable to the transliterated Korean word "Mirae", since both are being used in sources.

632: 811:? I don't see any results for "bareunmirae", only the name with a space. For the other two, I'm finding use in the past 30 days in reliable sources, off the first page of my Google results: 1488:

violation, and Divided Use is irrelevant to this debate. Finally, I'm done talking to you, Garam. You have not AGFed at all in this discussion, and you have violated several tenets of

1604:"violation of discussion guidelines", "repeated debate issues", and "A violation of a collaborative relationship" (I assume that means an AGF violation?). These are serious issues. 1373:

3. First of all, today this political party said to me, as above. "Bareunmirae Party" has been named as official name of this political party. And I think this relates to number 1.

1917:) Also, it has clearly been stated that official names do not necessarily matter on Knowledge, which another user has conveniently decided to ignore, by all means necessary. 1948: 1849: 1704: 1475: 1473:

For the final time (since your controversial past on kowiki is showing here now), Saenuri, Minjoo, and Bareun falls under the "translation rarely used" protocol under

1030: 367: 1669:

for it, and don't cross me in further irrelevant disscusion. Also, if you don't know Korean language, please don't read it using "Google Translate". It is an obvious

1076:. Therefore, what you said about Bareun is invalid, because it falls under the "translation rarely used" protocol. The "Future/Mirae" part, however, falls under the 1867:

taking up of the less common usage “New Frontier Party” in place of the more common “Saenuri Party” on Knowledge, even if the former is in English. This is because

959:

And I would argue that the "evidence" given by Garam is the most recent of recent, when the "less recent of recent" information, in this case, carries more weight.

885:: The sources you cited above, for either of the names, represent some of the most reliable sources in South Korea and the world, so they are pretty good sources. 2084: 1817: 1795: 636: 425: 412: 135: 2099: 1722:

I'm busy editing articles and improving them rather than accusing other editors of being biased liars, so if you'll excuse me I'm done with this issue and you.

849: 257: 865:

Okay, from this it looks more like Bareun Future Party is more commonly used, especially outside Korea. I'm not familiar with most of these sources, though.

1655:

etc, because I believe that I can resolve several issues on Knowledge related to you smoothly. But now I think you don't think so. It is highly regrettable.

2079: 1905: 1939: 1868: 688: 164: 1216:, and people with better knowledge or different opinions might come by. I don't see any harm in letting this run the full 7 days, it's already been 4. 263: 1901: 839: 103: 654:, not "Our Open Party". And it is also the same with article name in English Knowledge. And in South Korea, "새누리당" and "더불어민주당" also was called " 1942:, and I believe that Kiteinthewind's noting of the existence of other usages does not refute that reasoning, as "Bareunmirae Party" remains the 2104: 2094: 1502:

English news is changing name of this political party on their news articles. But you have intentionally ignored it, and now you claim it is a

1045: 145: 1784:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

401:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

2089: 233: 572:

etc. And "Bareunmirae" and "Bareun Mirae" have the same meaning in Korean language. Also, all results in Google News is infinitesimal.

691:. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not here to enforce some Asiatic language or nationalistic appeal. You need to remember that. 1931: 914:

the same meaning with "Bareun Mirae". Also, "Bareunmirae Party" is official English name of this party on their website. Thanks. --

1634:

Blatant nationalism, which explains why he is railroading the change to Korean. We can't allow rules to be violated on Knowledge.

2036: 1577: 1222: 1185: 1135: 949: 871: 290:

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

107: 970: 907: 903: 899: 1809: 1154: 1100: 417: 224: 188: 111: 1913:

on an claim by another user that I have since called into question (not the least because it was "established" by violating

1665:

That log is outside English wikipedia. And I don't understand why many times I explain it in English Knowledge. Please read

475: 1074:

because their English translations are rarely used even in the English-language media, either inside or outside the country

1707:, and don't be unreasonable. And if you want to discuss it, please visit other page. HERE is talk page for the article. -- 1540: 469: 501:: Request rename goes against established conventions for the naming of articles on Knowledge, and is a rules violation. 44: 843: 565: 561: 518:

on Google News turned up at least 400 hits from multiple domestic South Korean and foreign sources, including Yonhap.

92: 69: 1935: 1069: 2051: 1848:– It has been established that “Bareunmirae Party” is the party’s own preferred form, but what’s important under 1832: 1775: 1747: 1129:

situation may change, but we have to go by what sources are available now, not what we think might happen later.

659: 440: 392: 1446:. And that answer is from Facebook. Also, I already said to you for official name of this political party. See 2021: 1401: 731:

Well, my point on this page isn't about "Asiatic" or "nationalistic". So, I don't know your opinion. Thanks. --

943:

It's really not, though. This party was created less than two months ago, all there is is recent information.

32: 1349:

1. Some english news is changing name of this political party on their news articles, as mentioned earlier.

1666: 1652: 1353: 1244: 1162: 1158: 827: 759: 755: 1396:

Firstly, you said some are changing their names, but not all are doing so, and that means we must follow

2061: 1785: 1757: 808: 402: 50: 1153:: But the name "Bareun Future Party" also no have consensus. The original version of this article is " 651: 1824: 1648: 1625: 1621: 1554: 1550: 1426: 1397: 1323: 1310: 1125: 1077: 1057: 432: 1268: 835: 1983: 1956: 1877: 1841: 1546: 1002: 449: 1548: 1400:. Second, the official name of the party is not the issue here. It has clearly been stated, under 857: 853: 631:

for example, was another case in which official English name; "Our Open Party" was not picked up.

232:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1969: 1927: 1918: 1723: 1695: 1659: 1651:: Do you remember what you said to me? I didn't visit ANI until now about your comments, such as 1635: 1605: 1493: 1417: 1314: 1286: 1204: 1081: 1006: 960: 935: 886: 792: 751: 723: 701: 692: 557: 551: 541: 502: 375: 1909: 1845: 819: 663: 453: 931: 355: 560:: Well, the name "Bareunmirae Party" is continue to increasing in English news. Please see 2031: 2006: 1712: 1678: 1572: 1515: 1464: 1383: 1331: 1298: 1276: 1264: 1252: 1217: 1196: 1180: 1170: 1150: 1130: 1108: 1096: 1020: 982: 944: 919: 895: 882: 866: 767: 736: 709: 671: 612: 489: 359: 216: 627:: Bareun Future Party seems to be the consensus English name among the Anglophone media. 1893: 1290: 998: 974: 831: 569: 17: 1979: 1952: 1873: 1409: 1363:→ It is has been officially named "BAREUNMIRAE party" in English. Sorry for late reply. 1213: 210: 200: 182: 2073: 1805: 1670: 1568: 1435: 784: 655: 537: 1914: 1507: 1503: 1489: 1485: 823: 704:: In here, where is the "Asiatic" or "nationalistic"? Please keep to the record. -- 524: 1897: 1480: 1413: 1405: 1053: 1479:. And it doesn't matter what the official name of South Korea is. We still use 154: 2060:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

2002: 1934:

and the Straits Times has likewise used "Bareunmirae Party" most often and in

1756:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

1708: 1674: 1613: 1511: 1460: 1379: 1327: 1294: 1272: 1248: 1243:

The Hankyoreh mentioned above, it changed "Bareun Future" into "Bareunmirae".

1166: 1104: 1016: 994: 978: 915: 788: 763: 732: 719: 705: 684: 667: 608: 485: 206: 910:. And "Bareunmirae" (바른미래) in Korean language (and romanizaion of Korean) is 1443: 1271:

you mentioned above, it says "Bareun Mirae", not "Bareun Future". Thanks. --

997:, two articles published February 28th continue to use Bareun Future Party ( 647: 628: 371: 2041: 2010: 1987: 1972: 1960: 1921: 1881: 1835: 1726: 1716: 1698: 1682: 1638: 1629: 1608: 1582: 1558: 1519: 1496: 1468: 1420: 1387: 1335: 1317: 1302: 1280: 1256: 1227: 1207: 1190: 1174: 1140: 1112: 1084: 1024: 1009: 986: 963: 954: 938: 923: 889: 876: 795: 771: 740: 726: 713: 695: 675: 640: 616: 544: 505: 493: 443: 378: 1545:

Also, Bareun Futurue seems to be widely used in recent articles as well.

1438:; If you think I am lying, you can ask this political party for it using 1099:: And original version of "title discussion before changing the name" is 229: 1293:

on article also changed "Bareun Future" into "Bareun Mirae". Thanks. --

1200: 354:

The party's English name, Bareun Future Party, has been established by

84: 63: 1439: 1065: 363: 1447: 1061: 463: 98: 96:, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to 110:. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the 279: 26: 1673:. Finally, please don't try to get off this topic. Thanks. -- 1412:

is still Czech Republic on Knowledge, not Czechia. Likewise,

787:

to the letter, and in the strictest manner humanly possible,

662:", not "New Frontier Party" and "Together Democratic Party". 1863:

and the Bareun Party, which preceded the Bareunmirae Party.

153: 2024:, where next to no English sources use its official name, 1567:

Pretty much the entirety of this comment was an off-topic

1476:

the relevant convention on the naming of political parties

1402:

Knowledge:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names

307: 302: 297: 1408:

on Knowledge is still Ivory Coast, not Cote d'Ivoire.

1031:

relevant convention on the naming of political parties

2050:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

2030:. That's not the case here, and really it never was. 1746:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

754:: Do you remember? All this matter began your edits ( 2001:

as per my opinion of previous discussion. Thanks. --

325: 228:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1788:. No further edits should be made to this section. 405:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2064:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1760:. No further edits should be made to this section. 262:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1361:BAREUNMIRAE party 로 영문명이 정해졌습니다. 늦게 연락드려서 죄송합니다. 1949:Knowledge:Naming conventions (political parties) 1850:Knowledge:Naming conventions (political parties) 1705:Knowledge:Staying cool when the editing gets hot 1416:on Knowledge is South Korea, not Daehan Minguk. 368:Knowledge:Naming conventions (political parties) 337: 1359: 332:RM, Bareun Future Party → Bareunmirae Party, 320:RM, Bareun Future Party → Bareunmirae Party, 8: 2025: 646:Sorry? "열린우리당"'s official English name is " 374:is not named Yeollin Uridang on Knowledge. 30: 1940:Knowledge:Naming conventions (use English) 1869:Knowledge:Naming conventions (use English) 1774:The following is a closed discussion of a 1590: 689:Knowledge:Naming conventions (use English) 391:The following is a closed discussion of a 177: 58: 1049:names should be used in article titles. 466:; see the name at the bottom of the link 102:. All interested editors are invited to 1593: 179: 60: 1029:For probably the 5th time: here's the 2085:Low-importance Korea-related articles 1936:its most recent coverage of the party 1932:its most recent coverage of the party 1212:I don't know, I think it's not quite 7: 2100:Unknown-importance politics articles 1890:Strident Oppose and requesting close 1793:The result of the move request was: 633:2604:2000:CFC0:1A:34DA:E32:3F4E:62F7 410:The result of the move request was: 222:This article is within the scope of 90:This article is within the scope of 165:one or more inactive working groups 49:It is of interest to the following 2080:Start-Class Korea-related articles 575:"Bareun Future Party" -wikipedia: 516:A search for "Bareun Future Party" 25: 1898:An English article by Dong-A Ilbo 1800:this discussion again even if it 718:You know what I'm talking about, 589:"Bareun Mirae Party" -wikipedia: 1510:, for what "OR" violation is. -- 596:"Bareunmirae Party" -wikipedia: 520:A search for "Bareunmirae Party" 283: 209: 199: 181: 83: 62: 31: 384:Requested move 24 February 2018 140:This article has been rated as 1894:an article published April 2nd 1616:‘s talk page prior to the ban 242:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 2105:WikiProject Politics articles 2095:Start-Class politics articles 1228:21:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 1208:20:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 1191:18:35, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 1175:17:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 1141:16:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 1113:04:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 1085:23:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 1025:15:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 1010:15:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 987:13:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 977:etc - Feb 28, 2018 Thanks. -- 964:01:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 955:12:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 939:04:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 924:03:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 890:21:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 877:21:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 796:21:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 772:17:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 741:17:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 727:17:41, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 714:17:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 696:17:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 676:12:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 641:08:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 617:07:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 545:06:49, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 506:06:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC) 494:11:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC) 379:17:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC) 245:Template:WikiProject Politics 236:and see a list of open tasks. 162:This article is supported by 1157:" before user Kiteinthewind 532:This issue has been debated 2027:Österreichische Volkspartei 1900:also used "Bareun Future". 1767:Requested move 3 April 2018 120:Knowledge:WikiProject Korea 2121: 2090:WikiProject Korea articles 1836:01:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 1309:It's still a violation of 1199:, I believe it is time we 1070:Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami 762:etc) without consensus. -- 687:, is still a violation of 472:, since February 22, 2018. 264:project's importance scale 146:project's importance scale 123:Template:WikiProject Korea 2042:19:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 2011:18:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1988:18:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1973:18:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1961:18:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1926:I understand and respect 1922:07:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1882:03:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 1727:05:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 1717:05:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 1699:05:08, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 1683:05:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 1639:22:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1630:22:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1609:21:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1583:15:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 1559:21:30, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1520:05:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 1497:21:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1469:20:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1421:17:19, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1388:13:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1336:13:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC) 1318:21:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC) 1303:08:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC) 1281:08:11, 1 March 2018 (UTC) 1257:07:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC) 930:What you said above is a 683:: What you're proposing, 660:The Minjoo Party of Korea 582:10 results in Google News 536:, and I think we need to 444:19:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC) 261: 194: 161: 139: 78: 57: 2057:Please do not modify it. 1781:Please do not modify it. 1753:Please do not modify it. 398:Please do not modify it. 18:Talk:Bareun Future Party 2022:Austrian People's Party 1808:. Have a Great Day and 1571:and I have removed it. 1541:Personal attack removed 1506:violation. Please read 1344:My point is as follows: 2026: 1896:used "Bareun Future". 1667:special:diff/800369593 1653:special:diff/804513292 1370: 760:special:diff/825928606 756:special:diff/826005231 158: 126:Korea-related articles 106:and contribute to the 39:This article is rated 818:Bareun Future Party: 157: 1818:closed by page mover 848:Bareun Mirae Party: 512:Supplemental Comment 426:closed by page mover 324:, 24 February 2018, 225:WikiProject Politics 1842:Bareun Future Party 1432:See number 4 below. 1367:— Bareunmirae Party 1163:Bareun Future Party 450:Bareun Future Party 298:Bareun Future Party 1944:most commonly used 1044:The title used in 809:Bareun Mirae Party 159: 45:content assessment 1846:Bareunmirae Party 1834: 1821: 1740: 1739: 1544: 1155:Bareunmirae Party 1101:Bareunmirae Party 555: 454:Bareunmirae Party 442: 429: 347: 346: 340: 328: 308:Bareunmirae Party 278: 277: 274: 273: 270: 269: 248:politics articles 176: 175: 172: 171: 93:WikiProject Korea 16:(Redirected from 2112: 2059: 2029: 1831: 1827: 1815: 1810:Happy Publishing 1783: 1755: 1595:Extended content 1591: 1538: 1368: 1364: 781:strongly advised 549: 439: 435: 423: 418:Happy Publishing 400: 356:The Korea Herald 338: 336:, 3 April 2018, 326: 287: 286: 280: 250: 249: 246: 243: 240: 219: 214: 213: 203: 196: 195: 185: 178: 128: 127: 124: 121: 118: 104:join the project 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2055: 2039: 1826:Paine Ellsworth 1825: 1779: 1769: 1764: 1751: 1741: 1596: 1580: 1569:personal attack 1369: 1366: 1362: 1225: 1188: 1161:contents into " 1138: 1003:KBS World Radio 952: 883:User:Ivanvector 874: 434:Paine Ellsworth 433: 396: 386: 360:KBS World Radio 352: 312: 303:Bareunmiraedang 284: 247: 244: 241: 238: 237: 217:Politics portal 215: 208: 125: 122: 119: 116: 115: 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2118: 2116: 2108: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2082: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2066: 2052:requested move 2046: 2045: 2044: 2035: 2014: 2013: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1839: 1791: 1790: 1776:requested move 1770: 1768: 1765: 1763: 1762: 1748:requested move 1742: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1719: 1686: 1685: 1663: 1656: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1632: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1576: 1562: 1561: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1433: 1430: 1410:Czech Republic 1391: 1390: 1375: 1374: 1365: 1360: 1358: 1357: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1306: 1305: 1283: 1260: 1259: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1221: 1193: 1184: 1144: 1143: 1134: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1058:Bloc Québécois 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1027: 991: 990: 989: 975:Korean Heraldo 948: 928: 927: 926: 892: 870: 863: 862: 861: 846: 813: 812: 801: 800: 799: 798: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 716: 678: 622: 621: 620: 619: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600:in Google News 594: 593:in Google News 584: 583: 580: 579:in Google News 482: 481: 480: 479: 473: 467: 447: 408: 407: 393:requested move 387: 385: 382: 351: 348: 345: 344: 343: 342: 330: 311: 310: 305: 300: 291: 288: 276: 275: 272: 271: 268: 267: 260: 254: 253: 251: 234:the discussion 221: 220: 204: 192: 191: 186: 174: 173: 170: 169: 160: 150: 149: 142:Low-importance 138: 132: 131: 129: 88: 76: 75: 73:Low‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2117: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2065: 2063: 2058: 2053: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2038: 2033: 2028: 2023: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1996: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1970:Kiteinthewind 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1928:Kiteinthewind 1925: 1924: 1923: 1920: 1919:Kiteinthewind 1916: 1911: 1907: 1906:Straits Times 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1870: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1853: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1819: 1814: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1798: 1797: 1789: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1761: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1744: 1743: 1728: 1725: 1724:Kiteinthewind 1720: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1697: 1696:Kiteinthewind 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1661: 1660:Kiteinthewind 1657: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1640: 1637: 1636:Kiteinthewind 1633: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1607: 1606:Kiteinthewind 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1592: 1584: 1579: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1542: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1494:Kiteinthewind 1491: 1487: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1452: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1427:WP:DIVIDEDUSE 1424: 1423: 1422: 1419: 1418:Kiteinthewind 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398:WP:USEENGLISH 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1355: 1352:2. As others 1351: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324:WP:DIVIDEDUSE 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1315:Kiteinthewind 1312: 1311:WP:USEENGLISH 1308: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1287:Kiteinthewind 1284: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1205:Kiteinthewind 1203:this debate. 1202: 1198: 1194: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1165:". Thanks. -- 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1126:WP:USEENGLISH 1123: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1086: 1083: 1082:Kiteinthewind 1079: 1078:WP:USEENGLISH 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1052:For example, 1051: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1042: 1033:on Knowledge: 1032: 1028: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1007:Kiteinthewind 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 967: 966: 965: 962: 961:Kiteinthewind 958: 957: 956: 951: 946: 942: 941: 940: 937: 936:Kiteinthewind 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 891: 888: 887:Kiteinthewind 884: 880: 879: 878: 873: 868: 864: 859: 855: 851: 847: 845: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 810: 806: 803: 802: 797: 794: 793:Kiteinthewind 790: 786: 783:to adhere to 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 752:Kiteinthewind 742: 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 725: 724:Kiteinthewind 721: 717: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702:Kiteinthewind 699: 698: 697: 694: 693:Kiteinthewind 690: 686: 682: 679: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 656:Saenuri Party 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 618: 614: 610: 606: 599: 595: 592: 588: 587: 586: 585: 581: 578: 574: 573: 571: 567: 563: 559: 558:Kiteinthewind 553: 552:edit conflict 548: 547: 546: 543: 542:Kiteinthewind 539: 535: 531: 526: 521: 517: 513: 510: 509: 508: 507: 504: 503:Kiteinthewind 500: 496: 495: 491: 487: 477: 474: 471: 468: 465: 464:official name 462: 461: 459: 458: 457: 455: 451: 446: 445: 441: 438: 437: 436: 427: 422: 421: 415: 414: 406: 404: 399: 394: 389: 388: 383: 381: 380: 377: 376:Kiteinthewind 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 349: 341: 335: 331: 329: 323: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315:Discussions: 309: 306: 304: 301: 299: 296: 293: 292: 289: 282: 281: 265: 259: 256: 255: 252: 235: 231: 227: 226: 218: 212: 207: 205: 202: 198: 197: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 167: 166: 156: 152: 151: 147: 143: 137: 134: 133: 130: 113: 112:documentation 109: 105: 101: 100: 95: 94: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 2056: 2049: 2017: 1998: 1943: 1889: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1854: 1840: 1823: 1822: 1812: 1801: 1794: 1792: 1780: 1773: 1752: 1745: 1703:Please read 1534: 1474: 1425:Please read 1322:Please read 1240: 1121: 1103:. Thanks. -- 1080:convention. 1073: 999:Korea Herald 911: 836:Korea Herald 832:Korea Herald 804: 780: 779:You are now 749: 680: 624: 623: 570:Korea Herald 533: 528: 511: 498: 497: 483: 448: 431: 430: 419: 411: 409: 397: 390: 353: 333: 321: 314: 313: 294: 223: 163: 141: 97: 91: 51:WikiProjects 2062:move review 1786:move review 1758:move review 1481:South Korea 1414:South Korea 1406:Ivory Coast 1159:was changed 1054:Plaid Cymru 971:Yonhap News 934:violation. 858:Korea Times 854:Korea Times 403:move review 295:Move logs: 41:Start-class 2074:Categories 2032:Ivanvector 1804:a case of 1649:Spring3390 1622:Spring3390 1573:Ivanvector 1551:Spring3390 1459:Thanks. -- 1454:Party etc. 1378:Thanks. -- 1265:Ivanvector 1247:Thanks. -- 1218:Ivanvector 1201:guillotine 1197:Ivanvector 1181:Ivanvector 1151:Ivanvector 1131:Ivanvector 1097:Ivanvector 995:User:Garam 945:Ivanvector 912:completely 896:Ivanvector 867:Ivanvector 807:- perhaps 789:User:Garam 720:User:Garam 685:User:Garam 666:Thanks. -- 607:Thanks. -- 577:63 results 534:ad nauseum 484:Thanks. -- 413:not moved. 350:Party Name 339:discussion 327:discussion 108:discussion 1980:Cjeongbis 1953:Cjeongbis 1874:Cjeongbis 1492:as well. 1450:'s below. 1448:this link 1269:this link 1072:are used 932:WP:RECENT 828:Hankyoreh 648:Uri Party 629:Uri Party 598:4 results 591:6 results 566:Yonhap #2 562:Yonhap #1 460:Soruces: 372:Uri Party 322:not moved 1999:Support: 1444:Facebook 1214:so clear 1046:reliable 540:by now. 530:sources. 366:. Under 239:Politics 230:politics 189:Politics 2018:Support 1440:Twitter 1195:Then, @ 838:again, 805:Comment 681:Comment 658:" and " 527:, that 144:on the 1910:Xinhua 1908:, and 1806:WP:IAR 1796:moved. 1671:WP:ABF 1535:Oppose 1436:WP:AGF 1291:link 1 1289:: The 1267:: And 1122:Oppose 1068:, and 1066:Kadima 844:Yonhap 824:Dong-A 820:Xinhua 785:WP:AGF 625:Oppose 499:Oppose 470:Yonhap 364:Yonhap 362:, and 47:scale. 2037:Edits 2003:Garam 1915:WP:OR 1709:Garam 1675:Garam 1614:Garam 1578:Edits 1512:Garam 1508:WP:OR 1504:WP:OR 1490:WP:TE 1486:WP:OR 1461:Garam 1380:Garam 1328:Garam 1295:Garam 1273:Garam 1249:Garam 1241:Note: 1223:Edits 1186:Edits 1167:Garam 1136:Edits 1105:Garam 1062:Likud 1017:Garam 979:Garam 950:Edits 916:Garam 872:Edits 860:again 764:Garam 733:Garam 706:Garam 668:Garam 609:Garam 525:WP:NC 486:Garam 334:moved 117:Korea 99:Korea 70:Korea 2007:talk 1984:talk 1957:talk 1878:talk 1713:talk 1679:talk 1626:talk 1555:talk 1516:talk 1465:talk 1384:talk 1354:said 1332:talk 1326:. -- 1299:talk 1277:talk 1253:talk 1171:talk 1109:talk 1021:talk 1001:and 983:talk 973:and 920:talk 768:talk 758:and 737:talk 710:talk 672:talk 637:talk 613:talk 568:and 490:talk 478:etc. 2054:. 1902:UPI 1750:. 1442:or 850:UPI 840:UPI 538:GOI 476:TBS 456:– 258:??? 136:Low 2076:: 2040:) 2034:(/ 2009:) 1986:) 1959:) 1951:. 1904:, 1880:) 1844:→ 1802:is 1778:. 1715:) 1681:) 1628:) 1581:) 1575:(/ 1557:) 1537:- 1518:) 1467:) 1386:) 1334:) 1301:) 1279:) 1255:) 1226:) 1220:(/ 1189:) 1183:(/ 1173:) 1139:) 1133:(/ 1111:) 1064:, 1060:, 1056:, 1023:) 1015:-- 985:) 953:) 947:(/ 922:) 908:#5 906:, 904:#4 902:, 900:#3 875:) 869:(/ 856:, 852:, 842:, 834:, 830:, 826:, 822:, 791:. 770:) 739:) 722:. 712:) 674:) 664:#2 652:#1 650:" 639:) 615:) 564:, 514:: 492:) 452:→ 395:. 358:, 2005:( 1982:( 1955:( 1876:( 1820:) 1816:( 1813:! 1711:( 1677:( 1658:@ 1647:@ 1624:( 1553:( 1543:) 1539:( 1514:( 1463:( 1429:. 1382:( 1330:( 1297:( 1285:@ 1275:( 1263:@ 1251:( 1245:# 1169:( 1149:@ 1107:( 1095:@ 1019:( 993:@ 981:( 918:( 894:@ 881:@ 766:( 750:@ 735:( 708:( 700:@ 670:( 635:( 611:( 556:@ 554:) 550:( 488:( 428:) 424:( 420:! 266:. 168:. 148:. 114:. 53:: 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index