164:
88:
64:
98:
33:
152:
256:
228:
200:
459:
Please don't misrepresent the facts. The sentence in question reads "Rabbi
Michael Lerner is ... rabbi of Beyt Tikkun synagogue-without-walls in San Francisco and Berkeley ...." It clearly doesn't start with "I" and it isn't by Michael Lerner. As I wrote above, it is a description of the author of
369:
Why? There was a good faith attempt to add references and materials to the article, but it violated guidelines and policy. Using an editorial piece from the spiritual leader and using it as a reference for a claim is clearly not proper, but letting it stay would improperly influence the AfD.
444:, the fact that it starts "I" and that it's by Michael Lerner that this is an editorial. As such, it's of paramount importance to state that this is an editorial and not an actual article in the SF Chronicle. Stating or implying it is anything other than an editorial is misleading.
594:
here, and I see no evidence of notability, independant from the visit from
Sheehan. This, in itself, does not make the congregation itself notable. To use an example, the President of the US visits many, many organizations, however, this does not make these places notable. -
502:
an article, but rather a brief intro. That's all. It's not meant to be taken as an article but rather as a brief informative piece. It's not appropriate to use it in an encyclopedia as it's not an article, but rather an intro to an editorial.
334:
If you don't have anything to add to it, could you please leave the article alone for a few hours while other editors work to improve it? That's considered good
Knowledge etiquette while an article is on AfD. Thank you. —
177:
74:
546:
In general, political activities are not a problem unless a not-for-profit recommends a candidate or political party. Also, the
Sheehan controversy is part of what makes Beyt Tikkun notable. —
414:
Since the inuse tag was added I have refrained from editing the page. You have called me disruptive and a dick. Neither is true and I do think you need to work on your tact, sir. Good day.
631:
636:
210:
392:. Two editors have made a simple request of you. Even if you were right and the source was inappropriate, is it impossible for you to wait a few hours before you delete it? —
641:
621:
266:
626:
570:
Sheehan visited their congregation once. They got some mild press. That's not enough to establish notability. The congregation itself has to be notable.
355:
I aggree with Malik, let other editors have a chance to build the article for at least a short time. Your opinion has been stated and noted. Thanks.
646:
527:
It seems to be that stating the political affiliations of this congregation is inappropriate and may put the in legal jeopardy with the IRS. See
319:
I am removing this statement and the related reference and it's an article written by the spiritual leader and it's quite clearly not neutral.
126:
531:
for more details. Further, I am not sure if the political affiliations/backings are in the least bit relevant to this article. Thoughts?
557:
471:
403:
346:
284:
I've tagged this article for deletion. It simply is not notable and does not contain sufficient context to explain it's notability.
111:
69:
480:
Malik is correct. These words are not Lerner's but that of the San
Francisco paper. This is an important point, and a fact.
169:
44:
485:
386:
Correction: It's not an editorial. It's the description of the author of the editorial, written by the newspaper.
360:
262:
234:
206:
551:
465:
397:
340:
32:
238:
547:
461:
393:
336:
50:
575:
536:
508:
449:
419:
375:
324:
304:
289:
481:
356:
255:
227:
199:
125:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
591:
571:
532:
504:
445:
415:
371:
320:
300:
285:
600:
103:
615:
596:
87:
63:
604:
579:
561:
540:
512:
489:
475:
453:
423:
407:
379:
364:
350:
328:
308:
293:
17:
159:
121:
116:
93:
299:
The article has now been improved to the point where it asserts notability.
460:
the editorial, written by the newspaper, and not part of the editorial. —
528:
151:
389:
250:
222:
194:
26:
150:
115:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
438:
PRIMARY VIEWS by Rabbi
Michael Lerner is an editorial
632:Redirect-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
637:NA-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
8:
642:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
58:
43:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
440:It's plainly clear both from the title
60:
523:Synagogue with political affiliation?
109:This redirect is within the scope of
30:
7:
237:on February 14, 2008. The result of
49:It is of interest to the following
622:Redirect-Class California articles
265:on 5 February 2008. The result of
209:on August 24, 2013. The result of
25:
627:NA-importance California articles
178:San Francisco Bay Area task force
254:
226:
198:
162:
135:Knowledge:WikiProject California
96:
86:
62:
31:
647:WikiProject California articles
261:This article was nominated for
233:This article was nominated for
205:This article was nominated for
138:Template:WikiProject California
498:from the newspaper, but it is
175:This redirect is supported by
1:
309:06:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
170:San Francisco Bay Area portal
129:and see a list of open tasks.
605:21:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
580:21:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
562:21:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
541:21:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
513:20:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
490:20:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
476:19:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
454:19:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
424:19:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
408:19:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
380:18:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
365:18:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
351:18:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
329:18:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
294:21:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
663:
315:"synagogue-without-walls"
158:
81:
57:
155:
112:WikiProject California
75:San Francisco Bay Area
154:
141:California articles
156:
45:content assessment
277:
276:
249:
248:
221:
220:
193:
192:
189:
188:
185:
184:
104:California portal
16:(Redirected from
654:
258:
251:
230:
223:
202:
195:
172:
167:
166:
165:
143:
142:
139:
136:
133:
106:
101:
100:
99:
90:
83:
82:
77:
66:
59:
36:
35:
27:
21:
18:Talk:Beyt Tikkun
662:
661:
657:
656:
655:
653:
652:
651:
612:
611:
525:
482:Culturalrevival
390:Don't be a dick
357:Culturalrevival
317:
282:
168:
163:
161:
140:
137:
134:
131:
130:
102:
97:
95:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
660:
658:
650:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
624:
614:
613:
610:
609:
608:
607:
585:
584:
583:
582:
565:
564:
524:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
411:
410:
387:
316:
313:
312:
311:
281:
278:
275:
274:
267:the discussion
259:
247:
246:
231:
219:
218:
211:the discussion
203:
191:
190:
187:
186:
183:
182:
174:
173:
157:
147:
146:
144:
127:the discussion
108:
107:
91:
79:
78:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
659:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
619:
617:
606:
602:
598:
593:
590:I agree with
589:
588:
587:
586:
581:
577:
573:
569:
568:
567:
566:
563:
559:
556:
553:
549:
548:Malik Shabazz
545:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
530:
522:
514:
510:
506:
501:
497:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
473:
470:
467:
463:
462:Malik Shabazz
458:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:PRIMARY VIEWS
439:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
409:
405:
402:
399:
395:
394:Malik Shabazz
391:
388:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
348:
345:
342:
338:
337:Malik Shabazz
333:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
279:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
253:
252:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
225:
224:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
197:
196:
180:
179:
171:
160:
153:
149:
148:
145:
128:
124:
123:
118:
114:
113:
105:
94:
92:
89:
85:
84:
80:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
42:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
554:
526:
499:
495:
468:
441:
437:
436:
400:
343:
318:
283:
270:
242:
215:no consensus
214:
176:
120:
110:
51:WikiProjects
40:
243:Keep upheld
616:Categories
494:The intro
132:California
122:California
117:U.S. state
70:California
558:contribs
472:contribs
404:contribs
347:contribs
263:deletion
235:deletion
207:deletion
41:redirect
597:Rjd0060
592:Bstone
572:Bstone
533:Bstone
505:Bstone
446:Bstone
416:Bstone
372:Bstone
321:Bstone
301:Bstone
286:Bstone
280:Delete
47:scale.
39:This
601:talk
576:talk
552:talk
537:talk
529:here
509:talk
486:talk
466:talk
450:talk
420:talk
398:talk
376:talk
361:talk
341:talk
325:talk
305:talk
290:talk
271:Keep
269:was
241:was
213:was
500:not
239:DRV
119:of
618::
603:)
578:)
560:)
539:)
511:)
496:is
488:)
474:)
452:)
422:)
406:)
378:)
363:)
349:)
327:)
307:)
292:)
73::
599:(
574:(
555:·
550:(
535:(
507:(
484:(
469:·
464:(
448:(
418:(
401:·
396:(
374:(
359:(
344:·
339:(
323:(
303:(
288:(
273:.
245:.
217:.
181:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
