Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party/Archive 1

280:

mentioned dynasties. The political activities of BJP in tamilnadu like supporting a non-existent matha at kanchi etc, show that it wants to gain foothold in tamil south. BJP , Has previously attempted and still continues to covertly and overtly take up the management and “ownership” of ancient temples of tamil nadu. For this purpose it is working alongside pseudo-scholars, and pseudo-intellectuals to forge an identity to connect it to those temples historically. It has already created its own versions of many available ancient texts and documents of ancient tamil dynasties, with the help of pseudo-intellectuals. The RSS organization regularly brings in people at different position who take up tamil names and claim to be “tamil brahmins”. It has also attempted to systematically spread misinformation that these “brahmins”(whom it has sponsored) were the ones who have descended from(references: www.bharathavarsha.com/iyer.html) those who were patronized by ancient tamil clans (chola/pallavas), even though it is well known that the former were inveterate foes of the latter and that during that age there was a perpetual trade embargo implemented most effectively by the cholas. The term “iyer” used by southern BJP functionaries is a very recent one and not prevalent during ancient times. The brahminical identity of many such people itself remains a suspect. A good number of these people are from deccan. With the help of anti-socials and vested interests within the state of TN and south they create an identity for themselves linking them to the state from remote past. The usual modus operandi is by trying to enter into matrimonial relationships with those who are presumed to be “natives”.

285:

that BJP, considering the humiliating defeat and further annihilations suffered by medieval deccani dynasties like chalukyas etc at the hands of the powerful and imperialist ancient tamil royal races of cholas and pallavas,sees an oppurtunity now centuries after the demise of the above mentioned tamil royalties, to make up for those humiliations.Infact, this did not happen all of a sudden. foundations of this were laid by titular(under british supervision) deccan chiefs of tanjore from 18th century on and to a lesser extent by the nayaks of vijayanagar dynasty. All of whom came down atleast a few centuries after the demise of the brilliant chola empire. The nayak chiefs and their nobles are also guilty of manipulating and forging the available authentic grants belonging to cholas and pallavas and also smuggling a few. It is well known fact that the deccani dynasties among the others were natural enemies of the powerful chola and pallava emperors and the latter never really considered giving up their enmity with the former, renewing it time and again by dispatching exceptionally predatory expeditions to deccan.

1151:. Second, the fact that Modi was accused of protecting mobs and obstructing the police is on record. The allegations may have been baseless, and the only people still saying it may be the Left, but at the time, all news sources, even rediff.com, carried accusations of this. That BJP activists were similarly accused is also true. That the BJP attempted to justify Modi's leadership was also true - see Vajpayee's Goa speech. That he was embarrassed we already have seen. Can you suggest what in particular you would like changed? The passage cannot of course, go entirely. That it affected the BJP's standing and it's moral superiority over the post-1984 Congress is unquestionable, and also that it dominated the discourse within the country and within the NDA itself for some time. 1135:"The BJP was severely discredited by the 2002 Gujarat riots, where the Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi of the BJP was accused of protecting Hindu mobs and obstructing the work of police to stop violence against the Muslim minority. Many BJP activists and party members were accused of orchestrating the violence. Over 2,000 innocent people, about eighty percent Muslims and the remainder Hindus were killed and tens of thousands displaced in the riots. Though the BJP attempted to defend and justify Modi's leadership, the moderate wing of the party was embarrassed and weakened by the effects of the fiasco on the party's image and its efforts to woo Muslim voters. International reprimands followed including the controversial revocation of Mr. Modi's US visa." 577:

call BJP t in my preceding remark. I just wish to point out limitations of "resists analysis in terms of left/right" (left/right is virtually never an issue of self-identification. If the economical policies of BJP are to be studied, then BJP places itself firmly on the rightwing flank of Indian politics). Also I question the logic of seeing nationalist and t as mutually exclusive categories. After all virtually all ts are nationalists, whereas not all nationalists are ts. 3. I hope you're aware that 'pinko' is not a very swadeshi term. --

2686: 31: 1199:

was an ally of the BJP's at the time. It is specified that VAjpayee {The "moderate leadership") was particularly embarassed. Note also that the Congress party page specifies that many human rights orgs believe the Congress was responsible for the 1984 riots. If you feel that other leaderships articles in other countries do not reflect accusations that they mismanaged riots under their administration, edit those articles, not this one.

2005:(2)This second question is about why was the article called "Secret advertisement" that I made taken away from the Knowledge page on the Indian Peoples Party? Because I learned recently as far as I know that underneath an editing box like this there’s a small rectangular box with the words Edit summary above it. So did I just need to write in it to explain why I changed the BJP article by adding extra text/paragraph’s 2163:. Restructuring of the section is a good idea; the material should be incorporated into the normal narrative of the BJP's history. The section on "responsibility" for Kargil is too long, for exmaple, and should contain a third-party RS indicating that criticism of the BJP on these grounds received political traction. (If none is to be found then it should not be in the article at all.) -- 2623: 1148:(a) can we disagree that the BJP was 'discredited'? I expect some qualifier of that is permissible; however, the BJP uptil that point had made much of the fact that communal riots had never taken place in a State where it was in power. The Gujarat riots caused that statement to rebound. The Prime Minister himself said that it embarassed him everywhere he went 1959:

Indian Peoples Party could clarify for me this position. Therefore does the Indian Peoples Party represent conservative ideologies on the right but support or oppose extreme forms of discrimination like anti-Semitism, Nazism, Holocaust denial and the Libertarian National Socialist Green Party which used the Indian Peoples Party banner on their links page?--

1173:

kinds of incidents happen all the time. What I don't understand is, Riots worse than these have happened under several leaderships in several countries. Why is Indian Leadership being picked on here ? What I want to see is either all Party pages being updated to reflect criticism or this being dropped in the BJP Page

1243:

anyone is ganging up on the two major Indian parties; there have been no major riots elsewhere in the past twenty years that I can think of immediately, other than a few; the French riots in suburban Paris is one example, and they are mentioned prominently in the short article on the French ruling party, the

2089:

In the past few days there have been some questionable, unsourced edits to this article. At first I tried to remove them, but realized that I couldn't decifer between what was the recent POV edits and older material, as some was sourced. I would like to help with the editing of this article, but will

2024:

has a banner of BJP on their site, but this is in no way relevant to the current article. My guess is that BJP is unaware of this development. Also, we, Indians do not exactly fall under the races which are the support base (however small) of NAZIs. Hope this clears your doubt. Else, please feel free

1995:

Thank you User: Relato refero for that reply I will now give you one answer and two questions. Firstly from what I have learned from the Knowledge page on Hindutva ideology it does seem to be a personal but constructive form of ideology on the right wing that accepts different traditions and religons

1829:

I think the 'Political accusations' chapter should be removed, my empirical understand is that such chapters just function as an open invitations of opponents of the party in question to post their own pov queries. Gujarat 2002 is a notable event, and should be mentioned in the history chapter with a

1315:

Actually, I can guarantee that it won't, the leftist wikipedians will call you names and mass-revert all your changes.What I suggest is that you select the sentences from the BJP article that are critical and post them here in the talk page, then perhaps we can build up a criticism section (including

464:

Well, some white supremacists are members of the US Republican Party. Should we mention that in the Republican party page? It was done by people who just so happened to be members. Also, it is pro da calling the BJP "Hindu nationalists" Doesn't the republicans have a Christian nationalist agenda?

402:

The article currently says, "It has allied with regional parties to roll back the left-of-centre tendencies formerly endorsed by the Congress Party, which dominated Indian politics for four decades." This is clearly a point of view meant to justify the BJP's random alliance with parties of disparate

284:

The tainted kanchi acharya is known to be a hardcore supporter of both BJP and shiv sena and those parties have used that falseful math’s influence to gain political ascendancy.But this is not only for generally known motives of gaining power in tamil south. The less known reason seems to be the fact

279:

BJP's politics also give a probably correct impression that it has to be regarded as a contemporary legatee of many medieval deccan dynasties like chalukyas etc. There are a number of strong reasons behind this. BJP has had its origins in the karnataka-maharashtra-andhra region, the home to the above

1613:

1. Can you share with us why or how the addition of ‘Thackeray’s call to form suicide squads in India’ under the “controversy” section could be considered as ‘out of context’? 2. More importantly, do you think if it's appropriate to leave some remarks/explanation as to why you are removing certain

1451:

Which is why it should be interspersed throughout the article, not in a criticism section. Just because each article is independent of each other doesn't mean we can't apply the same standard to pages that are basically equivalents. Criticism of a political party makes absolutely no sense because it

1242:

I think the accusations actually died down after the reports began to be made public and people concentrated on lapses at the local level. The anti-Modi sentiment was strongest early on, when the BJP was still in power at the centre. A look at rediff's articles on Gujarat confirms this. I dont think

1228:

I didn't mean it like that (about Power). What I tried to say was When the accusations from the media started to surface (which was a year or two ago) the Congress led coalition of UPA was at Power. There are several 100s Party Articles. Editing each of them would be a herculean task, I just want to

978:

What's the difference between these really ? Although the Gujarat riots have happened during our tenure, there is no proof to show our direct involvement (and the statement is non sourced). The KKK activities however have showed solid links towards the Republican Part and many Southern Democrats (in

576:

1. I'm sorry to point it out to you, but it is a historically correct statement. Mussolini and other always claimed to be neither leftwing nor rightwing (which to some extent can be explained by the incorporation of both left and right ideas into t ideological construct). 2. However, I did not

440:

BJP doesn't consider itself to be "Hindu nationalist." You consider it to be so. According to BJP, Hindutva and Indianness are the same. That is exactly the point here. They consider themselves to be Indian Nationalist party. Abdul Kalam, a Muslim became the President of India thanks to them. Please

2865:

May I ask why you have removed every single authentic and very well cited edits? Every single edit I did was cited, supported, and consistent with the reports of the highly reputable and the largest Indian newspapers (among others, the Times of India and the Hindu) and BBC. You can click on every

1874:

The less known reason seems to be the fact that BJP, considering the humiliating defeat and further annihilations suffered by medieval deccani dynasties like chalukyas etc at the hands of the powerful and imperialist ancient tamil royal races of cholas and pallavas,sees an oppurtunity now centuries

1198:

You are incorrect. The Left was not in power at the Centre. The BJP was in power at both the centre and the state levels, and hence the party's reputation suffered. That Modi genuinely supported the mobs is not stated, merely that there were accusations - from many, including Chandrababu Naidu, who

1053:

Yeah, i agree with 122.172.4.133. We learn in our class 1 that all Indians are our brothers and sisters. I won't comment anything about the BJP, RSS and Bajrang Dal, though the Bajrang Dal was shown to have a hand in the Mangalore pub attack. And whoever wants mention of KKK in the Republican Party

319:

Andhra Pradesh is not economically stagnant. Check your facts before posting idiocy. Yes the Defeat of TDP was the reason NDA couldn't survive. But the TDP was defeated because of other reasons. Such as farmers felt Chandrababu Naidu didn't care about them and the Congress promised Free Electricity

226:

thae article is too pro BJP , it doesnt give much significance that the BJP is the politicial organization which mainly belives in hindu nationalism , under the controversies the hate speeches of advani and the 1983 assam riots and the tehelka corruption expose do not figure if wikipedia is neutral

92:

This talk page seriously needs neutral voices, the article itself needs more information most importantly regarding various cells within the party and its performance as the principal opposition since 2004. I have removed the template in the top most part of the page because its really not required

2771:

Someone recently removed the description Right Wing claiming that the source was an opinion piece. There are literally hundreds of peer reviewed sourced describing BJP as a Right Wing, Hindu Nationalist party - I have inserted some of them. Many academic sources also state that it is predominantly

2105:

Hi, you were right when you had reverted the edits of the other editor. But apologising does not soleve any purpose. This guy, according to his own admission, is a BJP suporter (BTW, I have never voted for another party than the BJP), and as such his edits are full of POV materials supporting BJP.

1077:

What are you talking about? There is really no link between the GOP and the KKK. The Republican Party, like the Northern wing of the Democratic Party, has generally been supportive of civil rights and strongly opposed the Klan at the time the KKK were the strongest, in the early 20th century. The

2268:

No confusion at all and do not depart yourself…note that it is impossible to provide accurate reference on each and every wording in WP. The reference is mainly lies on recap of the topic and that has to be linked with the topic. In this case, the criticism that BJP widely received as being fully

1172:

Yes Modi "protecting the mobs" and other BJP leaders being involved was "on record" but like you said, It happened when the Left was in Power (in Centre). Modi's leadership was justified however him protecting the mobs have never been proven and Vajpayee never praised or approved Modi here. These

2563:

Hi, when submitting edit requests you need to tell us clearly, exactly what edit you would like to make and where and not by copying the entire article body and including the changes you would like to make to the talk page as we'd have to search through both articles until we find the difference

2488:

Wiki reflects only administrator’s view (in this case mostly privilege Hindu upper cast Indian’s), they can allow content to be added without any reliable reference like in this article or delete content which is supported by reliable sources references but goes against their ideology. They are

1958:

Hi this is User: Political Dweeb's explanation. The reason I took away the article on this talk page called the "BJP's position" is because no one seemed to want to talk to me about it so I put up the paragraphs under the title called Secret advertisement so anyone or the representatives of the

151:

This article is terrible, this talk page is terrible, and this entire subject is severely in need of neutral voices. It seems that the entire collective editing this article is composed of party supporters. This is not acceptable. I am not an expert and cannot personally contribute, but someone

738:

I strongly agree. I'm from the US reading this article in order to understand Indian politics--and therefore without knowledge or experience for bias--but the wording sounds like it should have been written for the BJP website itself. If you are going to clean a page of any negative content,

1098:

I'm removing the Gujarat Riots reference. The Congress page doesn't talk about the attacks on Bombay. The Republican Party page doesn't talk about KKK or and The Democratic Party page doesn't say anything about their pro-slavery stance (in the past). So Why should an unsourced

530:

When writing the article, in order to keep it non-biased it should include both criticism as well as the self-describtion of BJP themselves. However, when discussing the party ideology the article would be incomplete without a through presentation of BJP's roots in BJS, relations to RSS/Sangh

2179:

The BJP, along with the INC is a very controversial party. Eliminating redundancies is of course a great thing, but there has been so much criticism levied against it that we have to document at least the basics. That said, incorporating it into the article itself would make the content less

259:

I do not see any reason that both sections are needed in this article. They can be easily combined into one consistent section highlighting party ideology and listing the primary objectives of the ideology. I just wanted to know if anyone disagreed with me before I made any attempt at it.

2348:

I thought the BJP was a fascist party that helped Gujarati rioters pour petrol down the throats of Muslim men and set it alight after raping their female family members in front of them. Couldn't this article have a bit more detail about this? It seems to be written by the wrong people

924:

If you feel the KKK deserves a place in the Repulblican Party article, please add it there. The Gujarat riots are here because they were a significant development that occurred while the BJP was in power at both centre and state. Note that the Congress article clearly mentions the 1984

1031:

I Have a Simple Question about BJP, VHP, RSS, Bajrand Dal Etc. These people Want to build Ram Rajya, Is this is what mean Ram Rajya(Gujrat Riots) mean. Killing Innocent People, Raping There own Indians, Sister, mothers etc. Then Every one should think about These Parties.

2790:

This page is very biased. It overwhelmingly only represents the official views of the highly controversial BJP Party. If there is a group of editors willing to try to craft an attempt at a more neutral page, please...let's talk. Otherwise this page is little more than

2461:. Now, in this case someone has fixed it by adding a citation. But any editor can do it, so if you know of a source for an unsourced claim go ahead and add it. This article is generally lacking in citations, not just the claims marked as needing citations. And yes, 1121:

The article specifically does not blame the BJP. That section details the achievements of the second Vajpayee government in some detail; it also includes what was definitely one of the most newsworthy events of that period, the Gujarat riots. Let's look tat the

2249:

I believe you got confused; not without any reason though. What I meant was that, since it was you who had mentioned that BJP was anti-christian, the onus lay on you to provide sources of inference that are impartial in their judgement and at the same time

2221:

has added it without properly reading the Hindu article & other incidents which is directly coming to the subject. However, I haven’t removed it from xenophobia as I could not find any direct sources accusing this term with the subject. My question to

416:

may god save you indians from religion based fanatics & terrorist escorts. was there a single paragraph which didnt offer speculative bjp favourable views & which through omission of glaring realities tried to portray as if bjp was a

2120:

I have reviewed the edit history and agree with you. The past edits were referenced with BJP.org and had no reliable sources for the statements made. I will continue to watch the article for such unsourced POV. Thank you for your response.

2745:"Nationalism (Patriotism) is always better than fake (Pseudo) secularism, corruption, appeasement (vote bank politics), tolerance to terrorism and family/dynasty politics with help of corporate media-made delusions and false propaganda." 2040:

Thank you User: Shovon76 for your reply. I found on the history of the edits made to the page on the BJP that Relato refero said that the point I made about the link between BJP and LNSGP was unsourced. However I had shown the link called

2197:

Tripping Nambiar, the issues are mainly related to ideology that is going beyond the boundary of NPOV. Additionally, the template used is only meant for sections. If you want to add a fresh NPOV, raise the number of issues here and add.

914:

Excuse me, but many of us have no love for the neo-liberal, pro-Washington direction taken by the INC. We're just smart enough to realise that right-wing Hindu nationalists who form alliances with neo-Nazi parties like Shiv Sena are far

2002:(1)Is it possible so it can be clarified for safety's sake if you can communicate with a representative of the BJP to see if they oppose the LNSGP and the other extreme forms of discrimination that I previously been talking about? 288:

These activities point to the astonishing level of opportunism displayed by BJP and their sly character. Considering BJP as a political option violates the most fundamental, universal and timeless truth about rights to governance.

785:

Yes off course because to confuse and to gain muslims votes and eye wash for mulsim community nothing else. Eg: After Gujrat Riots Abdul Kalam Made President of India because to use as the duster for what BJP had done in Gujrat.

2423:

Wow. I believe you mean Hindus wrt to Godhra, and both Hindus and Muslims wrt the riots. Shovon was being metaphorical, and you are being disingenuous. It seems neither of you are removing yourselves to dispassionately view the

292:

Further it is well possible to prove that the kargil conflict of 1999 was stage managed by BJP because it envied what it saw as a "congress led" 1971 win over pakistan. An operation similar to 1986 brasstacks was also staged.

2143:

Frnds, I intend to trim down the article a bit. I hope to begin with the criticism / controversies portion which is quite big, it seems, with allegations and refutations. I request your invaluable opinions, and suggestions.

1509:

It seems that the honorable Sri Narendra Modi, the best CM in India, has had his page Hijacked by some Bangladeshi and some American Congressman. I ask you to step up and bring balance to his article. Thank You - Jai Hind.

1229:

know Why the BJP (and Congress) was (were) targeted towards these kinds of things ? OfCourse Chandra Babu et all criticised him; That's what Politicians do, They gang up on people who seem to be involved in a controversy.

2597:

Should be relegated to major issues, not things that have only been in the news for a couple weeks. Issues about Gujarat (which continue to haunt the party) belong, random incidents don't, since every party has corrupt

720:

Though India is Democratic and Republic all the Political parties supports Caste system and Religion. There is no scientific progress and thinking and all political parties also support reservation on caste system.

381:

We may agree that Hindutva implies secularism. But many sections of the BJP itself do not say so. Has the BJP ever advertised itself as secular? To speak about secularism, we have to drag the RSS into the discussion.

1303:

Criticism in a separate section is different from criticism in the story itself. The one in story can be laced with pre and post sentences to make in fully ineffective whereas that will not be the case if a separate

2866:

single link to verify that my edits were consistent with the historical news reports. My edits are necessary because they play a vital role in balancing, otherwise highly inaccurate, distorted and biased views.

1435:

Not necessarily, criticism(say of this BJP article) removes a feeling of bias. Of course there is nothing called as neutral criticism, which would be meaningless. And criticism is vital for a non-biased view.

211:

I tend to agree with Jammoe. Whoever this is (Ramiz Saiyad), please note that this is Knowledge and not your personal domain to post personal comments. Lets all work together for a better Knowledge

186:

BJP IS BEST PARTY NOW SHOWING,BECAUSE OF CONGRESS GOING TO RISE ALL TYPE OF LIVING THINGS,NOT CONTROLING,INTERESTING IN SHAREMARKET SHOW- MIDDLE CLASS INCOME GOING DOWN,INTEREST INCOME GOING DOWN,

371:

How so, Abdul Kalam is a Muslim. But he is respected widely among the BJP. As a matter BJP offered support to him in the first place. Actually all BJP wants to unity among Hindus and Indians.--

957:

I dont think they do, but there's a difference in my eyes between the KKK and the Gujarat riots. More to the point, if you think they deserve a place, this isnt where you should discuss it.

1366:

Please guys, view this merely as a Knowledge article. Criticism is an integral part of any good article and it removes the feeling of non-neutrality that users get on reading articles.

1810:

Editors are requested not to add their POV about the comparision of riots under various dispensations, and to edit the articles of the respective parties for the same. Thanks.

403:

ideological orientations merely to get hold of power, after it failed to secure a majority of its own. Such statements tend to bias the neutrality of the article concerned. --

835:

Question CAN A PARTY WHICH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DIVIDING THE COUNTRY ON RELIGIOUS GROUNDS AND INSIGHTING HATRED AMOUNG TWO COMMUNITIES BE GIVING CHANCE TO RULE OUR NATION.

514:

Some would claim that it is t. Obviously the BJP and it's supporters would dispute that. But it resists analysis in terms of left/right. It's a nationalist party.

1268:

Most of non-science related pages at wikipedia have criticism section why its not here, it should be added and filled with criticism BJP faces but in neutral langauge.

1316:

responses) and then put it in the article. Bear in mind that this will be a watering hole for POV-pushers and other extremist wikipedians so we all need to be careful.

1380:

And whoever says that criticism isn't there in pages of the Democrats, Republicans, AIADMK and whatever, please note that each article is independent of each other.

1939:

Wow - this entire article reads like an opinion piece with almost NO sources for the contents. In serious need of re-write to remove the bulk of the statements.

2466: 940:

You tell me, do or do they not deserve a place. Along with that I have no problem in adding that the Democrats once supported slavery and Republicans oppose it.--

2469:

exists to try to counter such systemic bias, but bias cannot be magically eliminated from Knowledge. It requires effort from its editors, not just accusations.

125:

Since 2004 the party has been in the opposition. A section should be included in the page pertaining to its role as the leading opposition party of India. ?

2452: 686: 1849:

While I see your point, IMHO we should keep the section as it is fairly breif and hasn't been inordinately expanded so far. Also, this format is used in the

2020:

Hi Political Dweeb, you can see the edit history of the page to see the reason why your edit was removed. Although you had correctly stated that the site

1350:

Generally speaking, separate 'Criticism' sections just lead to bad articles. A balanced discussion about a party should prevail throughout the article. --

2409:

What crap, what do you mean "cannot clap using a single hand"? Do you blame the Muslims for being there to be butchered? Your insensitivity is sickening

688:

and their numerous antisemitic comments. This group claims that Hindu civilization began 111.5 trillion years ago... a few trillion before the big bang.

1916:"BJP's politics also give a probably correct impression that it has to be regarded as a contemporary legatee of many medieval deccan dynasties..." etc. 698:

There is no mention of BJP in the link you gave above. I consider tagging the article as POV as an act of vandalism and I am hence removing the tag. --

2564:

between the two and this could take some time to do. If you would like to submit another request for this edit please feel free to do so but tell us

1334: 521:

Which by the way, is a classical t rhetoric. All major t movements have used the claim of "neither left nor right, just for the nation".

2824:

Chip Berlet was clearly stating the opposite, namely that it is highly biased in favor of the BJP. I agree with him - it is written as advertising.

1312:

or any other page, also I think such section will survive in 'INC' page. Be open to criticism. Regards, Vjdchauhan 06:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC).

2869:

I would also like to know the exact words that might have violated your policies, so I can use the vocabulary consistent with your policies.

1521: 754:

RSS VHP BJP were created by BRAHMIN MAFIA to see that only brahmins rule india and only upper castes become wealthy, educated & progressive

735:

This is no NPOV article - It only contains BJP Propoganda.They should mention Gujarat and also the rioting as a show of Model BJP ruled state.

2375:

for the incidents in Gujarat. Do remember that you cannot clap using a single hand. Both parties were responsible for the carnage in Gujarat.

1539:

Can anyone explain why all references to the UP election as well as the threat of derecognition have been removed? If not, I will restore it.

1004:

The only sites that support the BJP-Riots-Godhra-Gencide conspiracy theory are left-wing soapboxes. This is like blaming the British for the

740: 300: 79: 71: 66: 2752: 2356: 197: 109: 1581:

Why are certain members removing edits without any explanation? And they have removed it at least three times without any explanation. --

1039: 793: 666: 132: 2720: 2580: 2524: 2444: 883: 243: 899:

How is it that the Gujarat riots are mentioned in this article while the US Republican Party article talks nothing about KKK et all.

807:

No use debating that guys, its present in every political party. Caste equations are formed everywhere. Most of it is only eyewash.

2273:

towards minorities was well-referenced and therefore no need of keeping those fact tags which I feel complete inappropriateness. --

2719:

This image needs to be updated. Kerala and West Bengal are NOT ruled by the communists. Also Tamil Nadu government has changed. (

2470: 1614:

edits? Please look at the history of this page, you will find yourself removing certain edits without any explanation at all. --

1490: 1330: 1326: 1078:

Southern Strategy, on the other hand, does require a mention and has been mentioned in that article. Please do more research. --

2857:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. 2414: 1925: 1884: 1858: 1815: 1781: 1744: 1673: 1649: 1414:. There is no way to make a neutral criticism section, though there are ways to make a page neutral. Refer to 2 in this case. 851: 867:

I changed the word orgy to the word outburst as I did not find orgy to be an appropriate word to use within this context.

1411: 1338: 1244: 826:

Bakasuprman will no doubt be able to justify his recent revert of my careful editing of some recent uncited additions?

659:

using india in place of Bharat is similar to change name of our mother under influence of some looters (here british)

47: 17: 2543: 1731: 1687: 1407: 38: 2674: 2410: 2050: 2010: 1964: 1921: 1880: 1854: 1811: 1773: 1736: 1665: 1641: 1071: 1047: 906: 492:

The BJP considers itself to be a secular party and However the BJP is considered by some to be a secular party.

304: 2290:

Friend, if "it is impossible to provide accurate reference on each and every wording", the tags shall remain. --

1850: 1632: 1554: 1309: 1283: 744: 187: 105: 2756: 2360: 457:

Shouldn't someone mention the violence in Gujarat? The BJP was accused of condoning it or even supporting it.

201: 2045:

where the BJP link banner was on so I do not understand what Relato means when he says I have not sourced it.

136: 2462: 2448: 2399: 2169: 1984: 1762: 1713: 1472: 1441: 1385: 1371: 1059: 1043: 812: 797: 703: 670: 387: 239: 216: 2724: 2576: 2520: 1099:

statement made by some Congress fanatic be part of the BJP Page unless someone can convince me otherwise.

879: 2054: 2014: 1968: 2796: 2372: 2218: 1697: 1598: 1564: 1012: 847: 608: 554: 469:

Agree. The Knowledge article should reflect the official stance of the party and not the perceived one.

404: 321: 1468: 1437: 1381: 1367: 1055: 875: 808: 699: 383: 372: 235: 212: 343:

using the Hindu nationalist platform. To the BJP, Hindutva doesn't conflict with secularism, Hindutva

2748: 2670: 2512: 2352: 2126: 2095: 2046: 2006: 1960: 1550: 1247:. So I dont think that it is completely fair to say that the BJP and Congress have been singled out. 1035: 1005: 871: 839: 789: 662: 296: 231: 193: 128: 97: 1282:

Actually the criticism is there in the article. Read it closely. Bear in mind that criticism of the

1079: 1063: 2331: 2295: 2255: 2160: 2149: 1898: 1489:] on recent unprecedented derecogntion issues faced by BJP in the wake of Election CD controversy. 1083: 1067: 843: 261: 101: 2549: 2394: 2380: 2314: 2278: 2239: 2203: 2165: 2111: 2030: 1980: 1758: 1709: 1511: 651: 265: 2832: 2817: 2800: 2780: 2760: 2728: 2710: 2678: 2602: 2586: 2557: 2528: 2473: 2428: 2418: 2404: 2384: 2364: 2335: 2318: 2299: 2282: 2259: 2243: 2207: 2184: 2174: 2153: 2130: 2115: 2099: 2078: 2034: 1989: 1948: 1929: 1902: 1888: 1862: 1843: 1819: 1789: 1766: 1752: 1717: 1703: 1681: 1657: 1618: 1604: 1585: 1570: 1543: 1528: 1514: 1496: 1476: 1460: 1445: 1422: 1389: 1375: 1354: 1345: 1320: 1290: 1251: 1233: 1203: 1177: 1155: 1110: 1087: 1017: 983: 961: 944: 929: 887: 855: 830: 816: 801: 765: 748: 725: 706: 692: 685:

This is way too pro-pov. There is no mention of the BJP's repeated attempts to rewrite history

674: 654: 613: 581: 559: 478: 430: 407: 391: 375: 324: 308: 269: 247: 220: 205: 178: 161: 140: 113: 2570: 2516: 2458: 458: 174: 2829: 2792: 2777: 2647: 2553: 1944: 1727: 1692: 1593: 1559: 1009: 605: 551: 474: 426: 157: 1875:

after the demise of the above mentioned tamil royalties, to make up for those humiliations

2807: 2703: 2122: 2091: 1839: 1831: 1723: 1636: 1540: 1525: 1493: 1248: 1200: 1152: 958: 926: 827: 762: 722: 2492:

Edit shall be reverted if it does not confirm to fundamental wikipedia policies, namely

2106:

You'll have to ignore his edits, if you are really going to restore the balance. Thanks.

2651: 2635: 2505: 2493: 2390: 2327: 2291: 2251: 2231: 2223: 2145: 1894: 1615: 1582: 1453: 771: 1893:

Nope. Its rambling OR. I've reverted it before but the author is keen on its addition.

902:

Knowledge is overrun by Congress fans trying to destroy BJPs good image if anything.--

646:

one, i think it would make sense to replace 'Bharat' with 'India' in most cases since

2854: 2376: 2310: 2274: 2235: 2199: 2107: 2074: 2026: 1978:

for details of their ideology. The link-banner was probably an error of some sort. --

1403:- It doesn't create neutrality, it compartmentalizes non-neutralities (in the plural) 2877:

Last edited at 00:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 20:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

2643: 2599: 2501: 2497: 2481: 2425: 2181: 2069: 2065: 2061: 1457: 1419: 1342: 1317: 1287: 547: 348: 170: 2484:(reference) except BJP website, now protected from edit by biased administrators 2825: 2806:

Yeah ,it seems that the page has been attacked continously by anti-BJP elements.

2773: 1974:

They're right-wing but not in the manner you seem to think they are. Please see

1940: 1708:

Any other reason against including it? A notable event, one would have thought.

1557:

article, and the threat of derecognition had very little impact on the election.

1149: 1094:

A few words and Gujarat Riots (Please Read if you have anything to say about it)

470: 449: 422: 153: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2772:

supported from the upper castes, this might be included in the article as well.

2695: 2659: 1835: 1351: 1230: 1174: 1107: 980: 941: 903: 578: 532: 362: 335:

vote BJP". Recently the prime minister got into a controversy for saying that

2234:, if the person who added the fact tag had responded i.e Tripping Nambiar? -- 1631:

Why is their no mention of the Gujarat Riots in this article? The article on

2639: 2622: 2489:

making wiki dirty place & biased. Such administrators shall be blocked.

2438: 2090:

wait for some more experieced editors to comment and/or edit first. Thanks.

1308:

section is added. I don't have any problem of having 'criticism' section in

496: 152:

should. There should at minimum be a clearly defined "criticism" section. --

2742:

I added a warning that this page might be biased because of this sentence:

2068:), especially since there is no article along with the ad that serves as a 1591:

Because it is an out-of-context quote that really adds nothing to the page.

2439:

i like how 'citation needed' is on free market but not on all other issues

2655: 1975: 1452:

only comes from people with axes to grind, hence it does not help create

495:

Either the 'however' should be reworded, or something else got mixed up.

448:

Political science also classifies the BJP as hindu nationalist party. --

336: 2650:) where the party enjoys a majority of its own. In four other states — 2631: 1272:

BJP is a party with a Roadmap, 21'st Century road and 10'th Century map

689: 340: 1726:

instance was just meant as an example. Also, just two headings above,

639: 631: 507:

So is the party left-wing, right-wing, socialist, centerist or what?

2663: 2621: 713: 647: 643: 635: 332: 361:

isn't the very term 'pseudo-secular' a pro-Hindutva POV term? --

1577:

Why are certain members removing edits without any explanation?

1103:

If you are changing anything please state it here and say Why ?

489:

In the second paragraph after the list of presidents, it says:

779: 775: 546:

Ah yes, calling the BJP t. A nice pinko tactic. Perhaps

347:

secularism. A screwed up world view, but that's how it is. --

25: 2072:. That is why it was claimed that the link was unsourced. -- 339:

and Indianness are the same. They recently got re-elected in

2692:

please be more specific about what needs to be changed. --

2228:

the burden of proof lies with the one who put the fact tag

275:

political oppurtunism, duplicity and evidence manipulation

2480:

Ad page on BJP, This article does not include even single

2230:(as you quoted at the edit summary), It would have been 1912:

Can't we block the anon who keeps adding content llike

739:

couldn't you at least be a bit more subtle about it? --

2849: 2217:

FACT tag needed only when there is be short of of RS.

2042: 2021: 1830:

link to main article, but should be kept brief as per

778:right? Yeah, that's why we have vice-president of 531:Parivar, role in fueling communal clashes, etc. -- 600:Read the article. They pride themselves on being 2666:— it shares power with other alliance partners. 1879:Should this (and more) be there in the article? 1400:- Criticism is not necessary for a good article. 2853:, and are posted here for posterity. Following 2608:Edit request from Nirjharvarshney, 16 June 2010 1722:Precisely, the event is notable by itself, the 774:and other smart former dalits in power in the 2847:The comment(s) below were originally left at 8: 1996:of India even if they are not part of it. 1467:Okay, I end up agreeing with you :) Thanks. 630:Some of the latest versions of the page use 2393:before making any additions to the article- 1999:However Relato refero my two questions are 1483:Derecognition on charges of inciting hatred 1054:page can by all means go and add it there. 2630:BJP is currently in power in five states ( 2309:So whats this parties econimic position?-- 1341:, and many others. Isn;t that interesting? 650:is the term most commonly used in English 1325:Oh, and there is no criticism section on 1276:Vjdchauhan 11:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1106:Please Sign all your comments with ~~~~-- 1335:All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam 441:leave out politics and post only facts. 2536:Edit request from Mvz321, 10 April 2010 1690:. There is no reason for the inclusion. 979:mid 1800s) clearly supported Slavery.-- 758:A.B. Vajpayee (Ex.P.M.) is a brahmin. 1522:United States House of Representatives 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2504:, and also make inappropriate use of 1410:, in which case I must direct you to 7: 2850:Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party/Comments 2568:what you would like edited. Cheers, 2467:WikiProject Countering systemic bias 2465:is inherent in a project like this. 1806:Reference to Congress and Left riots 731:Article seems to be sustained by BJP 320:which they've failed to withhold. -- 419:unlucky loser which deserved to win 2326:AFAIK, it's fiscally conservative 2060:The banner ad is not considered a 1757:Funny. Well, go ahead and add it. 1062:) 03:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC) . Th 354:isn't this is pseudo-secular view? 331:One of the BJP's slogans is "true 24: 2855:several discussions in past years 2626:BJP ruled states marked in orange 1502:Balancing other BJP pages on wiki 1406:- I believe you are referring to 93:as the article is fair enough. 2786:Another Attempt at Neutral Edit? 2684: 2389:Shovon is right! Have a look at 2025:to write to me in my talk page. 1782: 1745: 1674: 1650: 1331:Republican Party (United States) 1327:Democratic Party (United States) 255:Ideology vs. Objectives/Policies 29: 1264:Absence of Criticism section!!! 894: 2808: 2300:11:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 2283:10:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 2260:09:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 2244:08:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC) 2208:05:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 1252:04:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC) 1234:23:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1204:21:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1178:18:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1156:05:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1111:01:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 1018:01:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 984:19:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 962:21:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 945:13:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 930:01:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 907:22:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 888:05:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 2474:20:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 2453:17:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 1903:06:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1889:16:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC) 1790:07:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 1787: 1767:09:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 1753:05:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1750: 1718:22:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1704:20:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1682:10:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1679: 1655: 1355:10:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1346:07:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1321:07:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1291:11:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 749:01:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 141:14:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC) 114:18:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2818:05:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 2801:01:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 2761:15:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 2429:21:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 2419:13:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 2405:14:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 2336:16:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 2064:, per Knowledge policy (see 1730:himself conveniently forgot 1658:09:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 1412:Knowledge:Criticism sections 1339:Bangladesh Nationalist Party 1245:Union for a Popular Movement 707:03:22, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 693:03:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 270:20:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 169:Welcome to Knowledge... ... 2603:17:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 2385:08:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 2365:05:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 2319:17:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 2185:18:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 2175:18:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2154:11:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1863:07:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1844:20:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1820:16:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1619:17:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 1605:03:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 1586:20:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 1520:I have not yet run for the 1477:09:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 1461:15:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 1446:12:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 1423:05:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 1390:03:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 1376:03:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 831:04:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 817:03:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 675:11:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 655:13:09, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 614:18:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 582:06:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 560:21:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 479:17:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 392:03:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 376:00:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 309:13:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 227:it should these items too 221:03:37, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 18:Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party 2891: 2587:12:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 2558:10:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC) 2529:16:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 2055:16:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 2035:13:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 2015:12:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 1990:17:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1969:15:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1497:02:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1088:22:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 1072:22:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 1048:14:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 802:14:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 325:18:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 248:06:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC) 206:18:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 2862: 2833:20:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 2781:20:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 2729:22:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 2711:14:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 2679:06:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC) 2619:BJP in various states == 2131:19:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 2116:19:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 2100:15:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 2085:Questionable recent edits 1949:14:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1930:16:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1571:18:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1487:I have added the section 856:13:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 766:07:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 642:article redirects to the 499:14:03, 2004 Oct 12 (UTC) 461:7:51, May 14, 2004 (UTC) 452:12:24, Dec 20, 2003 (UTC) 431:05:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 408:18:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 188:BHARTIYA JANTA PARTY BEST 2292:GRRRRRRR................ 2252:GRRRRRRR................ 2079:00:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 1851:Indian National Congress 1633:Indian National Congress 1555:Indian National Congress 1544:23:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 1529:15:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 1515:12:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 1310:Indian National Congress 1284:Indian National Congress 726:04:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 535:07:07, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) 365:04:49, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 179:19:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 162:20:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 1953: 1553:are not covered in the 770:Yeah thats why we have 716:system in India and BJP 398:POV to justify politics 2863:Mr. Goldstein Orwell, 2627: 2471:Reach Out to the Truth 2139:Downsizing the article 1918: 1877: 2625: 2614:{{editsemiprotected}} 2373:2002 Gujarat violence 2219:User:Tripping Nambiar 1914: 1872: 1825:Political accusations 88:Neutral Voices Please 42:of past discussions. 2498:no original research 2411:ReluctantPhilosopher 1922:ReluctantPhilosopher 1881:ReluctantPhilosopher 1855:ReluctantPhilosopher 1812:ReluctantPhilosopher 1551:1984 Anti-Sikh riots 1535:unexplained removals 638:in the text. As the 2443:talk about bias. -- 2043:http://www.nazi.org 2022:http://www.nazi.org 1732:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 1688:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 1408:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 1286:has the same issue. 895:I'm a bit surprised 2843:Assessment comment 2628: 1935:Unsourced Opinions 2875: 2874: 2751:comment added by 2584: 2544:editsemiprotected 2532: 2515:comment added by 2502:reliable sourcing 2482:reliable sourcing 2367: 2355:comment added by 1038:comment added by 891: 874:comment added by 859: 842:comment added by 792:comment added by 665:comment added by 299:comment added by 251: 234:comment added by 196:comment added by 131:comment added by 117: 100:comment added by 85: 84: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2882: 2860: 2859: 2852: 2815: 2763: 2709: 2706: 2701: 2698: 2688: 2687: 2648:Himachal Pradesh 2616: 2615: 2574: 2573: 2548: 2542: 2531: 2509: 2397: 2350: 2173: 2077: 1988: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1700: 1695: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1601: 1596: 1567: 1562: 1050: 890: 868: 858: 836: 804: 782:a muslim right? 677: 485:Slight confusion 405:fredericknoronha 311: 250: 228: 208: 143: 116: 94: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2890: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2848: 2845: 2788: 2769: 2746: 2740: 2704: 2702: 2696: 2693: 2685: 2671:Nirjharvarshney 2620: 2613: 2612: 2610: 2595: 2569: 2546: 2540: 2538: 2510: 2506:primary sources 2486: 2441: 2402: 2395: 2346: 2307: 2215: 2195: 2164: 2141: 2087: 2073: 2070:reliable source 2062:reliable source 2047:Political Dweeb 2007:Political Dweeb 1979: 1961:Political Dweeb 1956: 1937: 1910: 1908:Disruptive anon 1871: 1827: 1808: 1778: 1774: 1741: 1737: 1724:Anti-Sikh riots 1698: 1693: 1670: 1666: 1646: 1642: 1637:Anti-Sikh riots 1629: 1599: 1594: 1579: 1565: 1560: 1537: 1504: 1485: 1266: 1096: 1033: 1015: 1006:Moplah massacre 897: 869: 865: 863:Changed Wording 837: 824: 787: 756: 741:124.123.119.232 733: 718: 683: 660: 628: 611: 557: 505: 487: 438: 400: 317: 301:122.163.119.160 294: 257: 229: 191: 190:-RAMIZ SAIYAD 149: 126: 123: 95: 90: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2888: 2886: 2873: 2872: 2844: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2787: 2784: 2768: 2765: 2753:83.177.176.175 2739: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2714: 2713: 2669: 2636:Madhya Pradesh 2618: 2609: 2606: 2594: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2537: 2534: 2485: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2440: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2401:My coffee shop 2400: 2387: 2357:118.95.125.189 2345: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2306: 2303: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2263: 2262: 2250:irrefutable.-- 2224:User:Karimpuli 2214: 2211: 2194: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2140: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2086: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2038: 2037: 1993: 1992: 1955: 1954:User's Reasons 1952: 1936: 1933: 1909: 1906: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1826: 1823: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1608: 1607: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1506:Dear friends, 1503: 1500: 1492:.See also , 1484: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1464: 1463: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1416: 1415: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1323: 1313: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1275: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1114: 1113: 1104: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1013: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 950: 949: 948: 947: 935: 934: 933: 932: 919: 918: 917: 916: 896: 893: 864: 861: 823: 820: 772:Bangaru Laxman 755: 752: 732: 729: 717: 711: 710: 709: 682: 679: 627: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 609: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 555: 539: 538: 537: 536: 525: 524: 523: 522: 516: 515: 510: 504: 501: 486: 483: 482: 481: 456: 454: 453: 444: 437: 436:It is your POV 434: 399: 396: 395: 394: 369: 368: 367: 366: 356: 355: 330: 328: 316: 313: 283: 256: 253: 225: 198:117.98.165.226 184: 183: 182: 181: 148: 145: 122: 119: 102:Niteshpradhans 89: 86: 83: 82: 77: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2887: 2878: 2870: 2867: 2861: 2858: 2856: 2851: 2842: 2834: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2816: 2814: 2813: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2791:propaganda.-- 2785: 2783: 2782: 2779: 2775: 2766: 2764: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2743: 2737: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2707: 2699: 2691: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2667: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2624: 2617: 2607: 2605: 2604: 2601: 2593:Controversies 2592: 2588: 2582: 2578: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2545: 2535: 2533: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2490: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2463:systemic bias 2460: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2430: 2427: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2403: 2398: 2392: 2388: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2343: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2304: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2220: 2212: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2192: 2186: 2183: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2171: 2167: 2166:Relata refero 2162: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2138: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2023: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2003: 2000: 1997: 1991: 1986: 1982: 1981:Relata refero 1977: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1934: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1917: 1913: 1907: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1876: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1824: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1805: 1791: 1786: 1785: 1777: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759:Relata refero 1756: 1755: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1740: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1710:Relata refero 1707: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1696: 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1678: 1677: 1669: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1654: 1653: 1645: 1638: 1635:mentions the 1634: 1626: 1620: 1617: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1584: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1563: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1513: 1507: 1501: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1356: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1322: 1319: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1292: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1263: 1253: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1235: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1205: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1179: 1176: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1157: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1051: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1040:122.172.4.133 1037: 1019: 1016: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 985: 982: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 963: 960: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 946: 943: 939: 938: 937: 936: 931: 928: 923: 922: 921: 920: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 905: 900: 892: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 862: 860: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 833: 832: 829: 821: 819: 818: 814: 810: 805: 803: 799: 795: 794:122.172.4.133 791: 783: 781: 777: 773: 768: 767: 764: 759: 753: 751: 750: 746: 742: 736: 730: 728: 727: 724: 715: 712: 708: 705: 701: 697: 696: 695: 694: 691: 687: 680: 678: 676: 672: 668: 667:115.111.95.19 664: 657: 656: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 626:use of Bharat 625: 615: 612: 607: 603: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 583: 580: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 561: 558: 553: 550:used that no? 549: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 534: 529: 528: 527: 526: 520: 519: 518: 517: 513: 512: 511: 508: 502: 500: 498: 493: 490: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 466: 462: 460: 451: 447: 446: 445: 442: 435: 433: 432: 428: 424: 420: 414: 413: 410: 409: 406: 397: 393: 389: 385: 380: 379: 378: 377: 374: 364: 360: 359: 358: 357: 353: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 327: 326: 323: 322:138.88.117.66 314: 312: 310: 306: 302: 298: 290: 286: 281: 277: 276: 272: 271: 267: 263: 254: 252: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 223: 222: 218: 214: 209: 207: 203: 199: 195: 189: 180: 176: 172: 168: 167: 166: 165: 164: 163: 159: 155: 146: 144: 142: 138: 134: 133:59.161.145.20 130: 121:In Opposition 120: 118: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 87: 81: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2876: 2868: 2864: 2846: 2811: 2810: 2789: 2770: 2747:— Preceding 2744: 2741: 2721:69.115.82.63 2689: 2668: 2644:Chhattisgarh 2629: 2611: 2596: 2571:Jeffrey Mall 2565: 2539: 2517:Maverick1728 2491: 2487: 2445:94.71.97.213 2442: 2347: 2308: 2289: 2270: 2227: 2216: 2196: 2161:WP:Criticism 2159:Please read 2142: 2088: 2039: 2004: 2001: 1998: 1994: 1957: 1938: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1892: 1878: 1873: 1828: 1809: 1772: 1735: 1691: 1664: 1640: 1630: 1592: 1580: 1558: 1538: 1508: 1505: 1486: 1434: 1426: 1417: 1379: 1365: 1305: 1271: 1267: 1097: 1052: 1030: 901: 898: 876:Tenjikuronin 870:— Preceding 866: 834: 825: 806: 784: 769: 760: 757: 737: 734: 719: 684: 661:— Preceding 658: 634:in place of 629: 602:conservative 601: 548:Brinda Karat 509: 506: 494: 491: 488: 463: 459:mr100percent 455: 443: 439: 418: 415: 412: 411: 401: 373:71.163.68.87 370: 344: 329: 318: 291: 287: 282: 278: 274: 273: 258: 236:Bestinformer 224: 210: 185: 150: 127:— Preceding 124: 96:— Preceding 91: 60: 43: 37: 2793:Chip.berlet 2511:—Preceding 2494:neutral POV 2396:Ravichandar 2351:—Preceding 2269:inherently 2226:is that if 2180:unbalanced. 1869:Appropriate 1456:in any way. 1431:To Pectore: 1395:To Swaroop: 1034:—Preceding 838:—Preceding 788:—Preceding 295:—Preceding 230:—Preceding 192:—Preceding 36:This is an 2812:zeeyanketu 2767:Right wing 2660:Uttrakhand 2424:incidents. 2344:Neutrality 2193:POV issues 2123:Ism schism 2092:Ism schism 1663:Anybody?? 1627:Riots ...? 1541:Hornplease 1526:Hornplease 1494:Terminador 1249:Hornplease 1201:Hornplease 1153:Hornplease 959:Hornplease 927:Hornplease 828:Hornplease 763:Anirudh777 450:till we *) 2705:Notify Me 2697:DeltaQuad 2690:Not done: 2640:Karnataka 2459:So fix it 2328:Ram Astra 2146:Karimpuli 1853:as well. 1616:TomCat111 1583:TomCat111 1306:Criticism 1080:Jay942942 1064:Jay942942 503:ideology? 315:Excuse Me 147:Criticism 80:Archive 5 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 2749:unsigned 2656:Nagaland 2581:contribs 2525:contribs 2513:unsigned 2353:unsigned 2311:J intela 2275:Googlean 2236:Googlean 2213:FACT tag 2200:Googlean 2075:Shruti14 1976:Hindutva 1832:WP:UNDUE 1771:Did it. 1270:My POV: 1122:passage: 1036:unsigned 1014:Bakatalk 884:contribs 872:unsigned 852:contribs 844:Hussaine 840:unsigned 822:Question 790:unsigned 663:unsigned 610:Bakatalk 556:Bakatalk 337:Hindutva 297:unsigned 262:Rahulpat 244:contribs 232:unsigned 194:unsigned 129:unsigned 110:contribs 98:unsigned 2830:snunɐw· 2826:·ʍaunus 2778:snunɐw· 2774:·ʍaunus 2632:Gujarat 2600:Pectore 2598:people. 2566:exactly 2426:Pectore 2391:WP:NPOV 2305:Economy 2182:Pectore 1728:Bakaman 1469:Swaroop 1458:Pectore 1438:Swaroop 1420:Pectore 1418:Thanks. 1382:Swaroop 1368:Swaroop 1343:Hkelkar 1318:Hkelkar 1288:Hkelkar 1056:Swaroop 1010:Bakaman 809:Swaroop 606:Bakaman 552:Bakaman 384:Swaroop 349:Arvindn 341:Gujarat 213:Swaroop 171:Jamesia 39:archive 2871:Thanks 2652:Punjab 2550:Mvz321 2377:Shovon 2232:better 2108:Shovon 2027:Shovon 1941:Triage 1512:Tri400 925:riots. 915:worse. 723:vkvora 704:वार्ता 700:Deepak 652:Vino s 640:Bharat 632:Bharat 471:Salilb 423:Ksense 333:Hindus 154:Jammoe 2664:Bihar 2170:disp. 2066:WP:RS 1985:disp. 1836:Soman 1352:Soman 1231:Milki 1175:Milki 1108:Milki 981:Milki 942:Milki 904:Milki 714:Caste 648:India 644:India 636:India 579:Soman 533:Soman 363:Soman 16:< 2797:talk 2757:talk 2738:Bias 2725:talk 2675:talk 2662:and 2646:and 2577:talk 2554:talk 2521:talk 2449:talk 2415:talk 2381:talk 2371:See 2361:talk 2332:talk 2315:talk 2296:talk 2279:talk 2271:anti 2256:talk 2240:talk 2204:talk 2150:talk 2127:talk 2112:talk 2096:talk 2051:talk 2031:talk 2011:talk 1965:talk 1945:talk 1926:talk 1899:talk 1885:talk 1859:talk 1840:talk 1834:. -- 1816:talk 1783:Talk 1775:Amit 1763:talk 1746:Talk 1738:Amit 1714:talk 1694:Baka 1686:See 1675:Talk 1667:Amit 1651:Talk 1643:Amit 1595:Baka 1561:Baka 1549:The 1473:talk 1454:NPOV 1442:talk 1386:talk 1372:talk 1274:;-) 1084:talk 1068:talk 1060:talk 1044:talk 880:talk 848:talk 813:talk 798:talk 745:talk 671:talk 497:Iaen 475:talk 427:talk 388:talk 305:talk 266:talk 240:talk 217:talk 202:talk 175:talk 158:talk 137:talk 106:talk 2809:--- 2654:, 2585:- 2508:. 1895:KBN 1699:man 1600:man 1566:man 780:BJP 776:BJP 681:POV 421:!! 2799:) 2759:) 2727:) 2677:) 2658:, 2642:, 2638:, 2634:, 2579:• 2556:) 2547:}} 2541:{{ 2527:) 2523:• 2500:, 2496:, 2451:) 2417:) 2383:) 2363:) 2334:) 2317:) 2298:) 2281:) 2258:) 2242:) 2206:) 2198:-- 2152:) 2144:-- 2129:) 2114:) 2098:) 2053:) 2033:) 2013:) 1967:) 1947:) 1928:) 1920:-- 1901:) 1887:) 1861:) 1842:) 1818:) 1765:) 1734:. 1716:) 1639:. 1524:. 1475:) 1444:) 1388:) 1374:) 1329:, 1086:) 1070:) 1046:) 1008:. 886:) 882:• 854:) 850:• 815:) 800:) 761:-- 747:) 690:KI 673:) 477:) 429:) 390:) 345:is 307:) 268:) 260:-- 246:) 242:• 219:) 204:) 177:) 160:) 139:) 112:) 108:• 76:→ 2828:· 2795:( 2776:· 2755:( 2731:) 2723:( 2708:\ 2700:| 2694:/ 2673:( 2583:) 2575:( 2552:( 2519:( 2447:( 2413:( 2379:( 2359:( 2330:( 2313:( 2294:( 2277:( 2254:( 2238:( 2202:( 2172:) 2168:( 2148:( 2125:( 2110:( 2094:( 2049:( 2029:( 2009:( 1987:) 1983:( 1963:( 1943:( 1924:( 1897:( 1883:( 1857:( 1838:( 1814:( 1779:@ 1761:( 1742:@ 1712:( 1671:@ 1647:@ 1471:( 1440:( 1384:( 1370:( 1337:, 1333:, 1082:( 1066:( 1058:( 1042:( 878:( 846:( 811:( 796:( 743:( 702:| 669:( 604:. 473:( 425:( 386:( 303:( 264:( 238:( 215:( 200:( 173:( 156:( 135:( 104:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index