Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party/Archive 8

2154:'Neoliberalism' is rarely used in Knowledge political party infoboxes as it is often used as a vague pejorative; there are very few parties that identify themselves as 'neoliberal' – it tends to be a label applied by those opposed to said party (e.g. the 'Feminist Review', which is one of the journal sources used in the infobox). 'Economic liberalism' is used in the infobox of virtually every other political party that advocates for liberal economic policies. That said, it is mistaken to describe the BJP as either neoliberal or economically liberal without describing the post-1990s 335:"truth" and others aren't." " Using a news article or a book as reference is equally misleading because a news article or a book too are "someone's opinion". So, it is better to go with what factual information indicates or official classification in the absence of factual information. In India, except CPI(M) and other communist parties, none of the major political outfits such as BJP, INC, AAP subscribe to "wing-based" politics. Why trying to force it upon Indian polity? Looks malevolent and some kind of vilification against the country to make it fit into a Western dogma." 2540: 1532:

as the 'global alliance of the centre right'. I agree with you on the FPJ source though, it does indeed seem to contradict my stance. I am not proposing my sources as an end all repository of information upon which to base this change. I do feel that reliable sources are a must but you're advocating for waiting for books and scholarly sources which could take years to document a change in the party's politics which has primarily taken place in the past year or so. So what do you propose as a stopgap until research papers and books become available?

2000:, I definitely think that economic liberalisation should be added to the ideology section. The recent privatization announcements and the reduction in business regulations shows a further shift of the party towards liberalisation and should be represented in the infobox. Not too sure about liberal conservatism though since the government is also reluctant on free trade with certain countries not to mention the plethora of tariffs they've added lately. 31: 1991: 1393: 1225: 1945: 1351: 2615: 2487: 964: 1685: 1688: 2172:

government was the 2016 demonetisation, which was overwhelmingly opposed by liberal economists and was similar to policy undertaken by the socialist government of Venezuela in the same year. Furthermore, there are policy differences between the economic approaches taken by the Vajpayee and Modi governments.--

2274:

The fact remains that "Neoliberalism" is a widespread descriptor of the BJP's policy. Whether the party itself adheres to that isn't relevant; political parties very often dislike the descriptors used for them. If "Neoliberal" is used for the INC by the preponderance of sources exploring its economic

1171:

Well, we would need a source discussing ideological disparities within the party. There's already some discussion of protectionist sentiment in the RSS vs liberalization during the first NDA government, but that can happen because some sources specifically made that comparison. Sources that just talk

385:

Yes, I said that and still stand by it. Trying to impose Western dogma of "wing" politics on India is quite bizarre. But, that feeling is niche at this moment (even in India) and popular among certain intellectual circles. (Personally, I find the whole "wing based" identity politics quite archaic and

104:

I am yet to recover from the shock after finding out that this page does not mention IT Cell anywhere. I wonder how it reached GA status. The BJP IT CELL, seems to be notable enough to have its own article. And at the very least a section dedicated on this page. Several books have been written on it.

2227:

Further, the Knowledge page for neoliberalism calls it "the 20th-century resurgence of 19th-century ideas associated with economic liberalism and free-market capitalism", not an ideology in itself. It also describes it as a very vague term: "the defining features of neoliberalism in both thought and

1551:

Opinion sources are most certainly not fair game for factual information, unless the authors themselves are considerable authorities on the subject (and often, not even then). "What would you propose as a stopgap" is a leading question. The "right-wing" descriptor reflects what high-quality reliable

1047:

I think that "Right-Wing" here comes from many assumptions and biases, as many steps taken by the party do not reflect its ideology to be right-winged, like lifting the ban on LGBT communities from practicing their rights, and many more, therefore it's social democratic platform should be considered

2171:

policies (economic nationalism was formerly in the infobox for this page). One policy example is retail, where the BJP takes a much more economic nationalist stance against the involvement of foreign multinational companies than the Congress does. One of the signature policy initiatives of the Modi

1531:

are valid. The HT source doesn't even mention Hindutva in context to BJP's current politics, it only speaks of discontent that has formed in the NDA of late, you seem to be paraphrasing quite liberally here. The diplomat source was meant to demonstrate the BJP joining the IDU which describes itself

1063:

Indian right can't be equated to that of western one over same definitions of progressivism given that set of Indian philosophical thoughts is different from those in west or middle east. Atheism, homosexuality and third geneders etc. weren't really barred in Indian religions. BJP's pursuit of soft

2451:

Please stop asking me to make every edit on your behalf. I have watchlisted this page, but I do not have the time to check or perform every last edit. If you have an edit you wish to make, please use the edit-request template, or better yet, register an account so eventually you can make the edits

2341:

ideology in the infobox as majority of the sources state that the party has some sort of adherence to the ideology. Though this may be prevalent during Modi's regime nonetheless since its inception it do follows populist principals whether its on economic or on social issues. Also note majority of

2023:

Please provide reliable sources showing that the party is broadly described as being "Liberal Conservative". Also, "economic liberalisation" is not an ideology. The relevant ideological descriptor is "neoliberalism", which is in fact often used for the BJP, and which I have no objection to adding.

1507:

describe the BJP as center-right; the HT source suggests it moved towards the center, and then has moved again towards hardline Hindutva; the FPJ journal, aside from being of dubious reliability, is explicitly making the point that Modi's BJP is more ideologically extreme than the BJP of the early

936:

The Wodak et al source does not support "right-wing populism". I agree that a single DNA piece isn't sufficient; I will look for more sourcing, and have removed the label pending further sources. I don't see how anything at RSP supports your claim that DNA is a generally unreliable source, though.

229:

The page reached GA status soon after the party won the 2014 general election. Its activities since then aren't covered in detail, which is a problem that needs to be fixed. I haven't had the time to fix it, and apparently, no one else has either. Incidentally, if the IT cell is that important, it

2212:

It is not original research. There are plenty of sources that support the addition of neoliberalism as an ideology for the Congress. Even the Gopalakrishnan source used to describe BJP as neoliberal in the infobox describes Congress as "India's main neoliberal political force". If the two parties

334:

Great, but let's give some context from my talk page where you said: "who is going to decide what is reliable source? Some leftist group of people? Isn't Knowledge supposed to be what people say? Put it to public poll and let people's opinion decide. You can't decide you are the sole caretaker of

1206:

and criminalizing the Triple Talakh in India, they showed that ensuring basic Human Rights for everyone is a need, irrespective of religion and empowered the Muslim Women. The Hindu Tradition already establishes the idea and need for secularism. As far as the Nationalism is concerned, there is a

307:

Classifying BJP as "Right Wing" seems like a misappropriation and forcefully trying to paint this political party a shade for the heck of it. Party itself has never claimed any such wing based association and their policies have glimpses across the political ideology spectrum. Counter-vies are

2399:

It would have been better if you had add this ideology. Anyway since you're not keen to add any more new ideology in the infobox and keep only the notable ones. Fine. One request I have please club the three sources of Neoliberalism under one ref in the infobox. It would look the infobox less

2162:

page like Hayek and Friedman; neither do they hail the free market itself. Their support for economically liberal reforms – like the Congress, and like most Western social democratic parties – is on an issue-by-issue basis rather than an ideological one. They just as often adopt economically

1133:

Even analytically, the concensus among authors is best to go with. BJP has a history of softened stances to aggressive policies. Barely any scholastic sources call it a centre right or far right party. It being at least right wing is a concensus though and can be displayed undisputedly.

741: 709: 2518:

Please remove "Right-wing populism" ideology from the infobox immediately, a new User:Jay942942 added that ideology on 8th October without much discussion on the talk page and reaching consensus. Moreover the sources do not confirm that ideology at all. Either provide

1502:

does not permit any other descriptor under the circumstances. Also, intentionally or otherwise, you're playing a little fast and loose with the sources. You've offered an interview and an opinion piece as evidence for changing positions; The Diplomat source does

1357:: I still think that in the strong region of the BJP, the absurdity by the cattle vigilante, the honor murder, and the caste system is serious. Objection to describe as 'Centre-right to right-wing' in the corresponding document infobox. This party is still a ' 1048:

in the "centre to centre-right" of politics and accordingly changes on the Wiki page should occur. This is a suggestion and speculation on how this article's page is worded when compared to other Indian political party Wiki pages, it seems biased.

723:

I do not see how the terms are interchangeable; also, you haven't answered my question about the other source. The new source you found isn't really a book, it's a diploma thesis released by a self-publishing company, and so it isn't reliable.

386:

unintelligent in today's world irrespective of the country). So, I get that Knowledge tries to go with popular opinions which is a good thing. I recently started to be active on the editing side of Wiki. So, guidelines were overlooked I guess.

1458:, the issue here is 'centre-right' as a term is rarely used in media reporting if at all. Party ideologies tend to be boiled down to the binaries of left/right. That said, there are sources that talk about BJP's recent shift toward the centre: 1627:, both the currently cited sources for BJP's 'right wing' ideology are more than a decade old. Those studies are clearly outdated and do not reflect the party's current position. Should Knowledge use outdated sources to justify its content? 913:. Its more like an opinion article. The second source page 23 does not mention anything about BJP's affiliation towards Right-wing populist ideology. In the entire book no where does it mention about BJP. I have checked thoroughly. Without 1498:, I'm not really referring to the Indian media, but to books and scholarly sources, which overwhelmingly refer to the BJP as "right-wing". Detailed articles about the BJP in the international media also overwhelmingly use "right-wing". 622:

It is very much. Most users go through lead just to have an incite. So a lead essentially should be a excerpt from article. Indeed adding same citations for same thing everywhere is redundant and unnecessary congestion of lead.

657:

It's also codified in the manual of style that it depends on the contentiousness of the subject matter, and I already stated in two seperate change notes, the statement is pretty obviously contentious in a political sense.

1766: 589:

if the information is already sourced, at least go to the effort of repeating the inline citations at the end of the lead, so it is clear where the claims are actually coming from. As of the moment, it is entirely unclear.

2087: 356:. You clearly have either not done so, or failed to understand it. Our description of the BJP matches what the highest-quality sources say about it. What the public thinks, or what you or I think, is utterly irrelevant. 1791: 1375:

I don't know what are you even talking about. In most cases the “cow vigilantes" are not even primary members of the BJP. And you mentioned “honor murder” and “caste system”, could you explain what do you even mean? --

1008:

which calls BJP a Welfare party. Hence I did some more searches. And there I found lots of other references mentioning BJP as Welfare capitalist party. So should we add it in the infobox? Please leave your opinions. --

904:

the "Right-wing populism" ideology in the infobox should be removed immediately. Because the first source is stated by a journalist of a news outlet which is noted for Pro-BJP. The Daily News and Analysis redirects to

2084: 410:, you make a couple of dozen edits with no edit summaries whatsoever. This is not good. Please remove the colours you have added to the text. Otherwise, I would be forced to revert all your edits at one go. -- 1691: 2437:

Please remove "Right-wing populism" ideology from the infobox immediately, a new user added that ideology without much discussion on the talk page. Moreover the sources do not confirm that ideology. Thanks--

1888:

I support keeping the position as 'right-wing'. This is well sourced. There are some sources that call it a 'centre right' or 'far right' party, but these are a minority. Right-wing is a good compromise.--

560: 689: 786:

My point is, it's still mentioned at all only in a handful of sources, and so likely constitutes undue weight. I would like to see substantially more sourcing before it's retained in the infobox.

1117:, and does not carry much weight. I'm no fan of the one-dimensional political spectrum for classification myself; but it's what most authors use, and for better or for worse we're stuck with it. 1402:, the party is definitely moderate right on a lot of issues but further right on others. "Centre-Right or Right-wing" would be a better descriptor. May also be important to note how despite the 775:

That source calls Hindutva to be national conservative in nature while describing the ideological basis of BJP. It can be removed since we have better sources available for this information.

1248: 1159:

I'm wondering if we work upon splitting "Ideology" in infobox into majority & factions? Would help in reflecting both, protectionist policies as well as neoliberal positions of party.

1087:

So, now I want to know does such terms like "Right Wing" which have general common usage on Knowledge allow for especial context uses as in here, which might give a foreign reader a false

1280: 1207:

Basic need for politicians and especially the leaders to be nationalistic, and if they are not, I am afraid, what do they want to do with the country and where do they want to lead it ?

1472:

No one here is advocating for a change of the descriptor to 'Centre-Right' only. 'Centre-Right or Right-wing' definitely adds more nuance given their changing stance on various issues.

972: 1715:, thanks for linking these. I think if a more recent source is available and is on par or better than the previous one it should be replaced or added alongside the existing sources. 1064:

and aggressive stances or centre left positions on few issues, at multiple instances of time may be able to make a case. But this context cannot. This political party essentially is

1815: 2158:

the same way (you can find many sources calling that party neoliberal). Unlike Western 'neoliberals'/economic liberals, BJP politicians never cite the thinkers mentioned on the WP

2546:

The linked reliable sources *do* confirm the party's ideology as right-wing populist; FWIW I would personally consider the neoliberal tag less explicit than right-wing populism.

2346: 1308: 1439:, you need to demonstrate that "centre-right" is a more common descriptor than "right-wing"; reams of information about specific government policies doesn't count for anything. 469: 2343: 1172:

about one or the other are insufficient. Also, unless there's a large quantity of them, they are going to be undue weight in the infobox and are better treated in the body.

2349: 1294: 1336: 1696:. They haven't been added because, as I said before, it isn't urgent; recent sources do not differ from older ones in their assessment of the BJP's general ideology. 1322: 870:

Do you mean the list? Probably not, both for reasons of due weight and practicality. It's only possible today because the list of deputy chief ministers isn't

1025:

I don't see how that's a reliable source; see also my reply above. The infobox is meant for summary, not including every detail; that's what the text is for.

2376:

I'd rather not, thanks. The infobox is meant to reflect the prominent descriptors of party ideology, not every single one. It's far too cluttered as it is.

282: 2414:

Right-wing populism is central to the BJP's ideology, and is well sourced in international media. I would strongly support returning it to the infobox.--

1646:

Switching the references is a trivial matter; the important question is whether contemporary sources use the same language, and overwhelmingly, they do.

433: 2193:

but as it has been pointed out in the discussions above, there are plenty of sources that support the addition of neoliberalism as an ideology for BJP.

2589:

is relevant to the BJP's foreign policy; it reflects Biden's policies, not the BJP's. If you disagree, please establish consensus for it's inclusion.

553: 524: 2108:

I'm working on finding sources; why are you in such a hurry? You may use the edit-request template, if you cannot wait for me to do some searches.

1865: 759:

I was referring to the Pathik source, for which I see you've corrected the page number. I do not have access to page 62; can you provide a quote?

2661:

Please provide sources for the changes you'd like made, then change the template back to answered=no and someone will take a look again. Thanks.

2140:

Excellent Job @Vanamonde93. You could have clubbed three sources under one ref. So that it would look less clutter inside the infobox. Thanks--

2124:

I have now added "neoliberalism", with accompanying sources, two of which are contemporary and one of which refers to the Vajpayee government.

661:

One other thing codified in the manual of style is that you should probably just add citations when people ask for them instead of cavilling.

91: 86: 1188:

I disagree with that opinion. The BJP is a clear "right-wing" party and is based on anti-Islamic sentiment, nationalism and Hindu tradition.--

379:

This thread was started before that... I am quite unsure of your opinion is in line with Knowledge ethos. But I prefer to ignore it for now.

2401: 2362: 2141: 2095: 81: 69: 64: 59: 2647: 2524: 2438: 1556:. No stopgap is necessary, and any change that isn't based on assessing the consensus of reliable sources would be a policy-violation. 2309:

I am opposed to adding 'liberal conservatism' as upon searching for them, there seem to be very few sources that support this claim.--

956: 922: 680:

I am concerned that this does not represent what most sources say. Of the three sources cited, only one actually supports this text.

1527:, Opinion sources are fair game, if a party's political ideology was a matter of fact then their recent policies as pointed out by 1508:

90s. In other words, none of your sources are good enough for the argument you are making, and two of them actively contradict it.

1956: 1366: 1193: 2666: 1552:

sources currently say about the party. If and when consensus among such sources changes, we update the article, as required by

323: 638:. I personally find it helpful to insert them in the lead on contentious articles, but it's quite clearly not a requirement. 1251:, women's reservation bill, transgender rights and welfare schemes and woman marriage age reform and woman empowerment. -- 462: 1968:, that is not pertinent to this discussion. If you don't have an opinion on this issue I suggest you strike your comment. 148: 252:

Does the BJP hold any internal party elections at lower level such as village, city ward, taluka, district etc.? Thanks.

568: 535: 506: 477: 444: 290: 2355: 1965: 1952: 1362: 1189: 304:

I'm starting this thread to initiate a discussion on "ideology" mentioned against BJP. Please feel free to weigh in.

47: 17: 1109:

If anyone wants to change this description, they need to demonstrate that the current one does not reflect what most

520:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

491:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

429:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

2662: 1840: 105:

The Award winning "I am a Troll" being one of them. The only mention of BJP IT cell was found in this biography at

38: 2405: 2366: 2145: 2099: 1212: 1100: 1053: 2155: 1403: 1767:"BJP has a more centrist position which Congress used to hold 30-40 years ago: Manish Chokhani, Enam Holdings" 2651: 1576:. If you did that by accident, you owe 삭은사과 an apology; if you did so on purpose, you need to carefully read 1281:"Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019 passed in Parliament: What is triple talaq Bill?" 744:? It says "national-conservative Indian People’s Party (Bharatiya Janata Party – BJP)", and it is written by 685: 549:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

458:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

271:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2621: 2528: 2493: 2442: 1927: 1231:: BJP clearly is a very diverse political party which includes policies from centre-right to right wing. -- 1005: 968: 564: 531: 502: 473: 440: 286: 257: 1431:. It doesn't matter what policies the BJP has passed, or what it's various members have gotten up to. What 604:

No, it is not redundant, if the reader cannot see where the claim is coming from it is not properly cited.

2625: 2571: 2497: 926: 155:

No It means something is found lacking in the article, and I pointed the problem here so that someone can

2600: 1665:, What are these contemporary sources though? If they exist why haven't they been added to this article? 2595: 2458: 2382: 2281: 2130: 2114: 2030: 1702: 1652: 1586: 1562: 1514: 1445: 1178: 1123: 1031: 981: 943: 880: 819: 792: 765: 730: 697: 644: 362: 341: 236: 207: 167: 118: 583: 495: 275: 2567: 2551: 2352: 2168: 1909: 1399: 1208: 1161: 1136: 1096: 1074: 1049: 975:

until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

804: 777: 750: 740:

Yes it is self-published source so it cannot be used, but which 'other source' you are referring to?

714: 681: 625: 586: 311: 136: 2415: 2358: 2310: 2229: 2214: 2186: 2173: 1889: 1694: 389: 349: 315: 2419: 2314: 2233: 2218: 2177: 1893: 1572:

Moreover, please do not under any circumstances describe good faith edits as vandalism, as you did

1406:

socialist history, the party's political position is described as a mere "Centre to centre-left".

415: 393: 319: 201: 161: 112: 140: 1435:

say about its ideology is all that matters. If you want to change the descriptor in the infobox,

997: 666: 635: 609: 595: 253: 186: 181:

BJP IT Cell currently re-directs to BJP. Suggest adding it as a section on the BJP page itself?

2670: 2655: 2575: 2555: 2532: 2463: 2446: 2423: 2409: 2387: 2370: 2318: 2286: 2237: 2222: 2207: 2181: 2149: 2135: 2119: 2103: 2058: 2035: 2014: 1982: 1960: 1938: 1920: 1897: 1729: 1707: 1679: 1657: 1641: 1617: 1591: 1567: 1546: 1519: 1486: 1450: 1420: 1384: 1370: 1259: 1239: 1216: 1197: 1183: 1165: 1140: 1128: 1104: 1078: 1057: 1036: 1019: 986: 948: 930: 885: 857: 824: 808: 797: 781: 770: 754: 735: 718: 702: 670: 649: 629: 613: 599: 572: 539: 510: 481: 448: 419: 397: 367: 344: 327: 294: 261: 241: 216: 190: 176: 127: 1600: 1577: 144: 1792:"BJP: View: India hasn't moved to an ideological corner, BJP's come closer to the mainstream" 2591: 2454: 2432: 2394: 2378: 2332: 2277: 2203: 2126: 2110: 2074: 2054: 2041: 2026: 2010: 1978: 1725: 1712: 1698: 1675: 1662: 1648: 1637: 1624: 1613: 1596: 1582: 1558: 1542: 1524: 1510: 1482: 1455: 1441: 1416: 1337:"Modi says govt reviewing marriage age for women, promises equal job opportunities for them" 1174: 1154: 1119: 1027: 977: 939: 899: 876: 815: 788: 761: 726: 693: 640: 516:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

487:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

425:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

382: 376: 358: 336: 232: 2646:

INCREASE THE SEAT NUMBER IN RAJYA SABHA TO 95 BY 3 SEATS MORE (2 IN GUJRAT AND 1 IN ASSAM)

2547: 156: 2566:

Bjp has no student wing.. abvp is not bjp's wing Its rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh's wing

1997: 1931: 1913: 1528: 1436: 1377: 1252: 1232: 1011: 865: 850: 411: 407: 874:

long, but given how fast state governments can turn over it's likely to grow quickly.

2159: 2080: 1553: 1499: 1114: 918: 910: 662: 619: 605: 591: 545:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

454:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

353: 267:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

195: 182: 2520: 2190: 1432: 1428: 1110: 914: 584:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bharatiya_Janata_Party&oldid=968894578

106: 2275:

policy, then go ahead and add it there; that's not relevant to this page, though.

1866:"India's Bharatiya Janata Party Joins Union of International Conservative Parties" 2342:

the sources state only "Populism" not "Right-wing populism". Check these sources

2195: 2046: 2002: 1970: 1717: 1667: 1629: 1605: 1534: 1493: 1474: 1408: 530:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —

501:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —

439:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1908:

Since we're already talking about right wing or centre right, I propose adding

973:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 26#Bharatiya jinnah party

1951:: I think the BJP is still not moderate enough to be called a center-right. -- 1944: 1350: 2091: 1043:

Changing Party type from "Right-Wing" only to "Centre-Right or Right-wing"

2338: 2164: 906: 1816:"BJP's political and ideological dominance is causing unease in the NDA" 963: 993: 745: 1603:

before, I'll be more careful next time. Thanks for pointing this out!

1309:"Transgenders get right to inherit agricultural land in Uttar Pradesh" 849:

Is Deputy Chief Minister notable enough to remain in this article? --

691:

is the equivalent of the specific ideology of national conservatism.

2213:

have the same ideology, what's the purpose of including it at all?--

133:

So wikipedia is also biased! dhillon 14:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

921:

in the infobox, which the party is historically noted for. Thanks--

2228:

practice have been the subject of substantial scholarly debate".--

1465:

There are other sources that refer to BJP as a centre right party:

1295:"BJP promises to pass women's reservation bill if voted to power" 708:

I assume these terms are interchangeable. Another equivalent is "

2609: 2481: 1095:

and construct a page or link the wiki definition of the same.

25: 2478:

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 October 2020

1091:

of the party ideology, I would then suggest to change it to

1930:

as already mentioned in it's economics policy section. --

1249:

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019

1202:

BJP clearly has no anti-Islamic sentiment, as by passing

2586: 1573: 967:

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

802:

Removed until more detailed sources are discovered.

1323:"Uttar Pradesh to set up transgender welfare board" 1247:BJP has many socially “Liberal” policies including 107:Prodyut_Bora#National_Convenor,_IT_Cell_(2007-09) 917:it is better to remove that ideology. Also, add 684:, please explain why you've cited page 263 of a 2606:Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2021 688:, or how "nationalist-conservative" on page 78 559:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 468:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 281:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 8: 2044:, kindly add 'neoliberalism' when possible. 1841:"Ayodhya: BJP's political road to Hindutva" 1599:, It wasn't an accident and I hadn't read 309: 134: 1427:Essentially all of this argumentation is 712:". This can be added as a better source. 352:, I asked you on your talk page to read 2094:. Whichever you find suitable. Thanks-- 1758: 1272: 634:This is in fact codified in the MOS at 1113:say about the topic. Anything else is 434:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 230:ought to have it's own article, too. 7: 554:BJP election symbol.svg -783x768.png 525:BJP election symbol.svg -783x768.png 955:"Bharatiya jinnah party" listed at 24: 1912:in the ideology of the party. -- 2613: 2538: 2485: 1989: 1943: 1391: 1349: 1223: 1004:While doing some search I found 962: 29: 971:. The discussion will occur at 2150:17:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 2136:18:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 2120:17:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 2104:04:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 2059:13:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC) 2036:17:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 2015:14:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1983:14:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1961:10:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1939:08:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1921:08:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1730:19:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1708:19:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1680:18:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1658:18:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1642:18:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1618:18:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1592:17:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1568:17:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1547:17:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1520:16:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1487:15:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1451:15:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1421:14:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1385:14:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1371:10:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1260:14:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1240:08:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC) 1217:08:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC) 987:19:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 949:22:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC) 931:05:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC) 886:14:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC) 858:08:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC) 825:15:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 809:05:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 798:15:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 782:01:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC) 771:15:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC) 755:15:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC) 736:20:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 719:19:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 703:15:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 2671:13:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 2656:08:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 1198:05:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC) 1184:14:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC) 1166:08:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC) 1141:20:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 1129:15:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 1105:14:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 1079:10:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 1070:right wing in Indian contexts 1058:07:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC) 262:23:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC) 100:No Mention of the BJP IT CELL 2601:16:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC) 2576:05:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC) 2556:07:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC) 2533:05:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC) 1072:where its "majority" leans. 746:a Polish political scientist 242:21:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 217:16:15, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 191:16:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 177:14:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 128:07:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 2640:to reactivate your request. 2628:has been answered. Set the 2523:or else remove it. Thanks-- 2512:to reactivate your request. 2500:has been answered. Set the 2464:15:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC) 2447:04:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC) 2424:13:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 2410:04:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC) 2388:22:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC) 2371:03:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC) 2319:14:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 2287:17:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 2238:14:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 2223:14:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 2208:13:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 2182:13:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 1898:14:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 1037:22:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC) 1020:08:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC) 671:10:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC) 18:Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party 2687: 1204:The Muslim Women Act, 2019 650:23:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 630:01:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC) 573:05:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC) 540:01:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC) 420:16:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 398:20:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 368:15:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 345:10:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC) 328:11:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC) 295:15:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 1926:also propose addition of 909:; it does not qualify in 614:03:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC) 600:06:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC) 2156:Indian National Congress 1864:Pillalamarri, Akhilesh. 957:Redirects for discussion 511:18:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC) 482:14:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC) 449:09:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC) 248:Internal party democracy 2580: 1928:economic liberalisation 845:Notability of Deputy CM 463:BJP Election Symbol.svg 2626:Bharatiya Janata Party 2498:Bharatiya Janata Party 969:Bharatiya jinnah party 2663:ScottishFinnishRadish 2189:, thank you for your 2079:would you please add 1325:. September 15, 2020. 710:National conservative 676:National conservatism 42:of past discussions. 2169:economic nationalist 2083:in the infobox with 1910:Liberal conservatism 1904:Liberal Conservative 892:Right-wing populism 582:Regarding revision 198:, yes. please add. 1845:Free Press Journal 1796:The Economic Times 1771:The Economic Times 1311:. August 20, 2020. 998:Welfare capitalism 565:Community Tech bot 532:Community Tech bot 503:Community Tech bot 474:Community Tech bot 441:Community Tech bot 287:Community Tech bot 2644: 2643: 2516: 2515: 2400:clutter. Thanks-- 2191:original research 2085:Source 1 Page 207 1429:original research 1339:. 15 August 2020. 1297:. March 30, 2014. 1115:original research 403:Unexplained edits 330: 314:comment added by 152: 139:comment added by 97: 96: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2678: 2635: 2631: 2617: 2616: 2610: 2599: 2585:I don't see how 2562:Bjp student wing 2542: 2541: 2521:reliable sources 2507: 2503: 2489: 2488: 2482: 2462: 2436: 2398: 2386: 2336: 2285: 2206: 2201: 2198: 2134: 2118: 2078: 2057: 2052: 2049: 2034: 2013: 2008: 2005: 1993: 1992: 1981: 1976: 1973: 1947: 1936: 1918: 1880: 1879: 1877: 1876: 1861: 1855: 1854: 1852: 1851: 1837: 1831: 1830: 1828: 1827: 1812: 1806: 1805: 1803: 1802: 1787: 1781: 1780: 1778: 1777: 1763: 1728: 1723: 1720: 1706: 1678: 1673: 1670: 1656: 1640: 1635: 1632: 1616: 1611: 1608: 1590: 1566: 1545: 1540: 1537: 1518: 1497: 1485: 1480: 1477: 1449: 1433:reliable sources 1419: 1414: 1411: 1395: 1394: 1382: 1353: 1341: 1340: 1333: 1327: 1326: 1319: 1313: 1312: 1305: 1299: 1298: 1291: 1285: 1284: 1283:. July 30, 2019. 1277: 1257: 1237: 1227: 1226: 1182: 1158: 1127: 1111:reliable sources 1035: 1016: 985: 966: 947: 915:reliable sources 903: 884: 869: 855: 823: 796: 769: 734: 701: 648: 578:Removing cn tags 366: 339: 240: 214: 211: 205: 174: 171: 165: 125: 122: 116: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2686: 2685: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2633: 2629: 2614: 2608: 2590: 2583: 2581:Biden's cabinet 2564: 2539: 2505: 2501: 2486: 2480: 2453: 2430: 2402:103.102.116.221 2392: 2377: 2363:103.102.116.221 2330: 2327: 2276: 2199: 2196: 2194: 2142:103.102.116.221 2125: 2109: 2096:103.102.116.221 2072: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2025: 2006: 2003: 2001: 1990: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1932: 1914: 1906: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1874: 1872: 1870:thediplomat.com 1863: 1862: 1858: 1849: 1847: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1825: 1823: 1820:Hindustan Times 1814: 1813: 1809: 1800: 1798: 1790:Baru, Sanjaya. 1789: 1788: 1784: 1775: 1773: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1697: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1647: 1633: 1630: 1628: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1581: 1557: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1509: 1491: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1440: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1400:UltraWikipedion 1392: 1378: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1253: 1233: 1224: 1209:UltraWikipedion 1173: 1162:Aman Kumar Goel 1152: 1137:Aman Kumar Goel 1118: 1097:UltraWikipedion 1075:Aman Kumar Goel 1050:UltraWikipedion 1045: 1026: 1012: 1002: 1000:in the infobox? 976: 960: 938: 897: 894: 875: 863: 851: 847: 814: 805:Aman Kumar Goel 787: 778:Aman Kumar Goel 760: 751:Aman Kumar Goel 725: 715:Aman Kumar Goel 692: 682:Aman.kumar.goel 678: 639: 626:Aman Kumar Goel 587:Aman.kumar.goel 580: 561:nomination page 547: 518: 489: 470:nomination page 456: 427: 405: 357: 337: 302: 283:nomination page 269: 250: 231: 209: 203: 200: 169: 163: 160: 120: 114: 111: 102: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2684: 2682: 2674: 2673: 2642: 2641: 2618: 2607: 2604: 2582: 2579: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2514: 2513: 2490: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2412: 2326: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2225: 2122: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1882: 1881: 1856: 1832: 1807: 1782: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1684:Here's a few; 1622: 1621: 1620: 1470: 1468: 1466: 1463: 1461: 1459: 1424: 1423: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1343: 1342: 1328: 1314: 1300: 1286: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1186: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1082: 1081: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1001: 990: 959: 953: 952: 951: 893: 890: 889: 888: 846: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 677: 674: 655: 654: 653: 652: 579: 576: 557: 556: 546: 543: 528: 527: 517: 514: 499: 498: 488: 485: 466: 465: 455: 452: 437: 436: 426: 423: 404: 401: 375: 373: 372: 371: 370: 301: 298: 279: 278: 268: 265: 249: 246: 245: 244: 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 101: 98: 95: 94: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2683: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2648:157.34.84.121 2639: 2636:parameter to 2627: 2623: 2619: 2612: 2611: 2605: 2603: 2602: 2597: 2593: 2588: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2525:202.78.236.33 2522: 2511: 2508:parameter to 2499: 2495: 2491: 2484: 2483: 2477: 2465: 2460: 2456: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2439:202.78.236.33 2434: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2396: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2384: 2380: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2345: 2340: 2337:, Please add 2334: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2288: 2283: 2279: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2226: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2202: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2170: 2166: 2161: 2160:neoliberalism 2157: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2132: 2128: 2123: 2121: 2116: 2112: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2081:Neoliberalism 2076: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2060: 2056: 2053: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2032: 2028: 2022: 2021: 2016: 2012: 2009: 1999: 1996: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1977: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1937: 1935: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1911: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1886: 1871: 1867: 1860: 1857: 1846: 1842: 1836: 1833: 1821: 1817: 1811: 1808: 1797: 1793: 1786: 1783: 1772: 1768: 1762: 1759: 1755: 1731: 1727: 1724: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1704: 1700: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1654: 1650: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1636: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1612: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1541: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1516: 1512: 1506: 1501: 1495: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1471: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1447: 1443: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1415: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1390: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1338: 1332: 1329: 1324: 1318: 1315: 1310: 1304: 1301: 1296: 1290: 1287: 1282: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1250: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1230: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1156: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1067: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1042: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1015: 1007: 999: 995: 991: 989: 988: 983: 979: 974: 970: 965: 958: 954: 950: 945: 941: 935: 934: 933: 932: 928: 924: 920: 919:Neoliberalism 916: 912: 908: 901: 891: 887: 882: 878: 873: 867: 862: 861: 860: 859: 856: 854: 844: 826: 821: 817: 812: 811: 810: 807: 806: 801: 800: 799: 794: 790: 785: 784: 783: 780: 779: 774: 773: 772: 767: 763: 758: 757: 756: 753: 752: 747: 743: 739: 738: 737: 732: 728: 722: 721: 720: 717: 716: 711: 707: 706: 705: 704: 699: 695: 690: 687: 686:224-page book 683: 675: 673: 672: 668: 664: 659: 651: 646: 642: 637: 633: 632: 631: 628: 627: 621: 618: 617: 616: 615: 611: 607: 602: 601: 597: 593: 588: 585: 577: 575: 574: 570: 566: 562: 555: 552: 551: 550: 544: 542: 541: 537: 533: 526: 523: 522: 521: 515: 513: 512: 508: 504: 497: 496:Lotus BJP.png 494: 493: 492: 486: 484: 483: 479: 475: 471: 464: 461: 460: 459: 453: 451: 450: 446: 442: 435: 432: 431: 430: 424: 422: 421: 417: 413: 409: 402: 400: 399: 395: 391: 387: 384: 380: 378: 369: 364: 360: 355: 351: 348: 347: 346: 343: 340: 333: 332: 331: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 305: 299: 297: 296: 292: 288: 284: 277: 276:BJP India.jpg 274: 273: 272: 266: 264: 263: 259: 255: 254:Jonathansammy 247: 243: 238: 234: 228: 227: 218: 215: 213: 206: 197: 194: 193: 192: 188: 184: 180: 179: 178: 175: 173: 166: 158: 154: 153: 150: 146: 142: 138: 132: 131: 130: 129: 126: 124: 117: 108: 99: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2645: 2637: 2622:edit request 2587:this content 2584: 2565: 2543: 2517: 2509: 2494:edit request 2328: 1994: 1948: 1933: 1915: 1907: 1873:. Retrieved 1869: 1859: 1848:. Retrieved 1844: 1835: 1824:. Retrieved 1822:. 2020-01-21 1819: 1810: 1799:. Retrieved 1795: 1785: 1774:. Retrieved 1770: 1761: 1753: 1504: 1396: 1379: 1358: 1354: 1331: 1317: 1303: 1289: 1275: 1267: 1254: 1244: 1234: 1228: 1203: 1160: 1151: 1135: 1093:Indian Right 1092: 1088: 1073: 1069: 1066:Indian right 1065: 1046: 1013: 1010: 1003: 961: 923:202.78.236.6 895: 871: 852: 848: 803: 776: 749: 713: 679: 660: 656: 624: 603: 581: 558: 548: 529: 519: 500: 490: 467: 457: 438: 428: 406: 388: 381: 374: 310:— Preceding 306: 303: 280: 270: 251: 199: 159: 135:— Preceding 110: 103: 75: 43: 37: 2433:Vanamonde93 2395:Vanamonde93 2333:Vanamonde93 2075:Vanamonde93 2042:Vanamonde93 1713:Vanamonde93 1663:Vanamonde93 1625:Vanamonde93 1597:Vanamonde93 1525:Vanamonde93 1456:Vanamonde93 1359:Right-wing' 1155:Vanamonde93 900:Vanamonde93 636:WP:CITELEAD 383:Doug Weller 377:Vanamonde93 338:Doug Weller 36:This is an 2630:|answered= 2568:Sanmay5336 2548:Goldsztajn 2502:|answered= 2452:yourself. 1934:Manasbose 1916:Manasbose 1875:2020-09-16 1850:2020-09-16 1826:2020-09-16 1801:2020-09-16 1776:2020-09-16 1754:References 1601:WP:NOTVAND 1578:WP:NOTVAND 1380:Manasbose 1268:References 1255:Manasbose 1235:Manasbose 1014:Manasbose 853:Manasbose 742:Cms.org.pl 350:‎Bmmanjesh 316:‎Bmmanjesh 92:Archive 11 87:Archive 10 2592:Vanamonde 2544:Not done: 2455:Vanamonde 2416:Jay942942 2379:Vanamonde 2311:Jay942942 2278:Vanamonde 2230:Jay942942 2215:Jay942942 2187:Jay942942 2174:Jay942942 2127:Vanamonde 2111:Vanamonde 2027:Vanamonde 1998:Manasbose 1890:Jay942942 1699:Vanamonde 1649:Vanamonde 1583:Vanamonde 1559:Vanamonde 1529:Manasbose 1511:Vanamonde 1442:Vanamonde 1437:Manasbose 1245:Comment : 1175:Vanamonde 1120:Vanamonde 1028:Vanamonde 978:Vanamonde 940:Vanamonde 877:Vanamonde 866:Manasbose 816:Vanamonde 789:Vanamonde 762:Vanamonde 727:Vanamonde 694:Vanamonde 641:Vanamonde 412:Kautilya3 408:Manasbose 390:Bmmanjesh 359:Vanamonde 308:welcome. 233:Vanamonde 82:Archive 9 76:Archive 8 70:Archive 7 65:Archive 6 60:Archive 5 2361:Thanks-- 2359:Source 6 2356:Source 5 2353:Source 4 2350:Source 3 2347:Source 2 2344:Source 1 2339:Populism 2325:Populism 2165:populist 2092:Source 3 2088:Source 2 1949:Disagree 1361:party.-- 1355:Disagree 907:Zee News 813:Thanks. 663:VineFynn 620:VineFynn 606:VineFynn 592:VineFynn 324:contribs 312:unsigned 300:Ideology 196:Prad2609 183:Prad2609 157:WP:FIXIT 149:contribs 137:unsigned 2040:Thanks 994:Welfare 141:Raj2092 39:archive 1554:WP:DUE 1500:WP:DUE 1494:Prolix 911:WP:RSP 354:WP:DUE 2634:|ans= 2620:This 2506:|ans= 2492:This 1995:Agree 1404:INC's 1397:Agree 1229:Agree 16:< 2667:talk 2652:talk 2596:Talk 2572:talk 2552:talk 2529:talk 2459:Talk 2443:talk 2420:talk 2406:talk 2383:Talk 2367:talk 2315:talk 2282:Talk 2234:talk 2219:talk 2178:talk 2146:talk 2131:Talk 2115:Talk 2100:talk 2031:Talk 1966:삭은사과 1957:talk 1953:삭은사과 1894:talk 1703:Talk 1653:Talk 1587:Talk 1574:here 1563:Talk 1515:Talk 1446:Talk 1367:talk 1363:삭은사과 1213:talk 1194:talk 1190:삭은사과 1179:Talk 1124:Talk 1101:talk 1089:view 1054:talk 1032:Talk 1006:this 992:Add 982:Talk 944:Talk 927:talk 881:Talk 872:that 820:Talk 793:Talk 766:Talk 731:Talk 698:Talk 667:talk 645:Talk 610:talk 596:talk 569:talk 536:talk 507:talk 478:talk 445:talk 416:talk 394:talk 363:Talk 342:talk 320:talk 291:talk 258:talk 237:Talk 187:talk 145:talk 2632:or 2624:to 2504:or 2496:to 2329:Hi 2200:lix 2197:Pro 2167:or 2090:or 2071:Hi 2051:lix 2048:Pro 2007:lix 2004:Pro 1975:lix 1972:Pro 1722:lix 1719:Pro 1672:lix 1669:Pro 1634:lix 1631:Pro 1610:lix 1607:Pro 1539:lix 1536:Pro 1505:not 1479:lix 1476:Pro 1413:lix 1410:Pro 1068:or 896:Hi 563:. — 472:. — 285:. — 210:ray 204:Big 170:ray 164:Big 121:ray 115:Big 2669:) 2654:) 2638:no 2574:) 2554:) 2531:) 2510:no 2445:) 2422:) 2408:) 2369:) 2317:) 2236:) 2221:) 2204:💬 2180:) 2148:) 2102:) 2055:💬 2011:💬 1979:💬 1959:) 1896:) 1868:. 1843:. 1818:. 1794:. 1769:. 1726:💬 1693:, 1690:, 1687:, 1676:💬 1638:💬 1614:💬 1580:. 1543:💬 1483:💬 1417:💬 1369:) 1215:) 1196:) 1103:) 1056:) 996:/ 929:) 748:. 669:) 612:) 598:) 571:) 538:) 509:) 480:) 447:) 418:) 396:) 326:) 322:• 293:) 260:) 189:) 151:) 147:• 109:-- 2665:( 2650:( 2598:) 2594:( 2570:( 2550:( 2527:( 2461:) 2457:( 2441:( 2435:: 2431:@ 2418:( 2404:( 2397:: 2393:@ 2385:) 2381:( 2365:( 2335:: 2331:@ 2313:( 2284:) 2280:( 2232:( 2217:( 2176:( 2144:( 2133:) 2129:( 2117:) 2113:( 2098:( 2077:: 2073:@ 2033:) 2029:( 1955:( 1892:( 1878:. 1853:. 1829:. 1804:. 1779:. 1705:) 1701:( 1655:) 1651:( 1589:) 1585:( 1565:) 1561:( 1517:) 1513:( 1496:: 1492:@ 1448:) 1444:( 1365:( 1211:( 1192:( 1181:) 1177:( 1157:: 1153:@ 1126:) 1122:( 1099:( 1052:( 1034:) 1030:( 984:) 980:( 946:) 942:( 925:( 902:: 898:@ 883:) 879:( 868:: 864:@ 822:) 818:( 795:) 791:( 768:) 764:( 733:) 729:( 700:) 696:( 665:( 647:) 643:( 608:( 594:( 567:( 534:( 505:( 476:( 443:( 414:( 392:( 365:) 361:( 318:( 289:( 256:( 239:) 235:( 212:ᗙ 208:X 202:D 185:( 172:ᗙ 168:X 162:D 143:( 123:ᗙ 119:X 113:D 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index