85:
64:
33:
406:
Aside from reconsidering the headings, whoever is maintaining this article on behalf of the company ought to locate some industry journal — as recent as possible — that lists the signed acts, in order to deflect accusations of OR. Barring that, a WP editor would probably have thought to put a link to
402:
does invite closer scrutiny. I've recently seen similar claims made for a label that's been defunct two years. As well, another article's "current acts" list hadn't been updated since 2007. I hope that the present article will age better.
256:– How can a reader know the difference between both record labels. The current titles are an assumption readers already know there are two record labels sharing the name, and that they are subsidiaries from other companies.
157:
If everything here is accurate, than it should be noted that recordings are occasionally being released with the Big Beat imprint as of 2010, well after it was absorbed by
Atlantic.
440:
237:
135:
125:
445:
435:
246:
241:
101:
250:
222:
197:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
92:
69:
387:) and lacking the neutral POV intended for Knowledge articles, it is at least (generally) well-written and informative.
165:
being the example I stumbled on, but
Discogs.com has a few others. Is this right? Does anybody know why that would be?
44:
17:
218:
188:
162:
324:
32:
421:
346:
328:
311:
287:
227:
174:
417:
365:
265:
261:
198:
50:
211:
341:
100:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
384:
320:
269:
170:
413:
257:
307:
283:
336:
429:
166:
97:
355:
274:
364:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
297:
84:
63:
158:
26:
260:
recommends better solutions than the current titles, like
187:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
354:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
96:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
201:. No further edits should be made to this section.
18:
Talk:Big Beat
Records (Atlantic Records subsidiary)
368:. No further edits should be made to this section.
238:Big Beat Records (Atlantic Records subsidiary)
8:
58:
30:
379:While this article appears to be largely
247:Big Beat Records (Ace Records subsidiary)
242:Big Beat Records (American record label)
251:Big Beat Records (British record label)
60:
441:Low-importance record labels articles
7:
206:The result of the move request was:
90:This article is within the scope of
110:Knowledge:WikiProject Record Labels
49:It is of interest to the following
446:WikiProject Record Labels articles
113:Template:WikiProject Record Labels
25:
436:Stub-Class record labels articles
83:
62:
31:
130:This article has been rated as
175:01:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
228:02:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
104:and see a list of open tasks.
347:20:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
329:09:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
312:13:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
288:17:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
462:
422:10:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
136:project's importance scale
375:how current is "current"?
129:
93:WikiProject Record Labels
78:
57:
390:But using headings like
361:Please do not modify it.
194:Please do not modify it.
407:the label's website in
308:I'm no IP, talk to me!
116:record labels articles
39:This article is rated
266:Big Beat Records (UK)
262:Big Beat Records (US)
385:Knowledge:Fancruft
45:content assessment
296:above proposal.
226:
150:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
16:(Redirected from
453:
363:
339:
304:
303:
280:
277:
272:
217:
214:
196:
118:
117:
114:
111:
108:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
461:
460:
456:
455:
454:
452:
451:
450:
426:
425:
377:
372:
359:
337:
299:
298:
278:
275:
270:
212:
192:
182:
155:
115:
112:
109:
106:
105:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
459:
457:
449:
448:
443:
438:
428:
427:
412:
399:Current roster
393:2010 - Present
376:
373:
371:
370:
356:requested move
350:
349:
331:
314:
254:
253:
244:
233:
231:
204:
203:
189:requested move
183:
181:
180:Requested move
178:
154:
151:
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
132:Low-importance
128:
122:
121:
119:
102:the discussion
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
458:
447:
444:
442:
439:
437:
434:
433:
431:
424:
423:
419:
415:
410:
404:
401:
400:
395:
394:
388:
386:
382:
374:
369:
367:
362:
357:
352:
351:
348:
345:
344:
340:
335:
332:
330:
326:
322:
321:HandsomeFella
318:
315:
313:
309:
305:
302:
295:
292:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
273:
267:
263:
259:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
236:
235:
234:
230:
229:
224:
220:
216:
209:
202:
200:
195:
190:
185:
184:
179:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
152:
137:
133:
127:
124:
123:
120:
107:Record Labels
103:
99:
98:record labels
95:
94:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
70:Record Labels
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
408:
405:
398:
397:
392:
391:
389:
380:
378:
360:
353:
342:
333:
316:
300:
293:
255:
232:
207:
205:
193:
186:
156:
131:
91:
51:WikiProjects
414:Weeb Dingle
366:move review
334:Sounds fine
208:rename both
199:move review
430:Categories
215:HairedGirl
41:Stub-class
258:WP:MOS RL
409:See also
223:contribs
167:Grayfell
159:Anniemal
153:Defunct?
381:fansite
317:Support
294:Support
134:on the
284:en-2.5
219:(talk)
47:scale.
383:(see
343:Slash
301:78.26
279:hotch
213:Brown
210:. --
163:Annie
418:talk
396:and
338:Red
325:talk
264:and
171:talk
358:.
286:).
221:• (
161:by
126:Low
432::
420:)
411:.
327:)
319:.
310:)
276:Tb
268:.
249:→
240:→
191:.
173:)
416:(
323:(
306:(
282:(
271:©
225:)
169:(
138:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
