538:
517:
31:
850:
429:
829:
408:
548:
961:
860:
1964:"binomi'N'al" with an "N" before the "al", which is {{em|not}} a typographic error,<!--Keep the text explaining that "binomiNal" is NOT a typo or redundant, and do not hide it inside a footnote. Even with the big {{not a typo}} template, people just keep removing "binomiNal", such as in ], ], and ]. Note that italicizing and underscoring the "N" both failed to prevent the removals. They got removed as "typos", instead.--: -->
926:
331:
321:
300:
95:
225:
204:
22:
85:
64:
439:
1960:(by User:Wotheina): The current clunky version. Moved the mentioning far away from the main term "binomial", as it is less important, and to attract less attention from hasty zappers. More explicitly stated the spelling difference in the main text, and added detail embedded comments for editors to understand why it is written this way. Now it becomes:
665:
1646:: Introduced the not-a-typo template with edit summary "This is the usual approach ({{sic|binominal|hide=y|reason=...}} would also work). We have zillions of articles that start in "'''Foobar''' also called '''foobnar'''..." form, and we don't underline like this in them. Rv. if you must, but this does work".
1982:
Since 2011, as far as I could find, "binominal" was removed 7 times (excluding apparent graffiti). The "n" is particularly hard to recognize, requiring particular emphasis. Most of the time it was emphasized with an underscore. But this underscore too is a frequent target of removal (at least 9 times
1289:
The text in the "Problems" section says "At least 1241 instances of such binomial duplication occur", but the paper by
Shipunov cited in support of this apparently shows only genus-level name duplication, not duplication of both genus and species names. Other sources, although less authoritative,
1229:
Scientific names are treated as literal strings of characters. They are always written in exactly the way prescribed in the nomenclature codes. So if you look in
Chinese or Russian botanical sources, for example, you will see the scientific names in the Latin script, although there may also be a
1377:
As a reader, I learned from this article that both "binomial" and "binominal" are legitimate terms. I appreciate that, and believe this information is worth kept on the lede. It is notable for being used by ICZN and other literature. The problem is that "binominal" has often been
1206:
Do the various naming codes adress how these names should be integrated into various languages? For example, I'm curious as to how the capitalization rules work in German. More interestingly, how should these names be written in languages which use non Latin scripts?
1040:
I've removed this recent addition to the lead, as it seems too narrow (and recent) a result for the lead: the paper addresses the concern that monotypic genera are an "artifact of human classification", saying that simulated phylogenies produce a similar
1315:"Because genus names are unique only within a nomenclature code, it is possible for two or more species to share the same genus name and even the same binomial if they occur in different kingdoms. At least 1240 instances of genus name duplication occur."
1473:: Replacement of "binomial" to "binominal" in the whole main text, with edit summary "It is Binominal Nomenclature - Binominal is the taxanomic naming system, a Binomial is a piece of math. This article should be named Binominal Nomenclature."
1126:"Tyrannosaurus rex is probably the most widely known binomial." doesn't seem to be an important enough sentence to include in the first paragraph, and with only a single citation from a generation ago it may no longer even be correct.
2151:
1962:
the system is also called '''{{not a typo|binominal|reason="Binomi'n'al", with an "n" before the "al", is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''',<ref name="ICZN1999_Chap2Article5"/:
1141:
Well, a Google search for the exact phrase "T rex" (Google ignores punctuation) gave me about 66 million hits as opposed to about 32 million for "E coli" which seems to me another well known abbreviated binomial.
2141:
2016:
I suspect there are people who do not see that there are people who do not see the "n". This makes things even more difficult. All other ideas to date also failed, so the current version became clunky like
1210:
Is there an official international standard for "localization" to various languages? Or is officially it left up to local language authorities? Or do the codes not adress this issue officially at all?
35:
2156:
1933:'''{{not a typo|binominal|reason="Binomi'n'al", with an "n" before the "al", is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature'''<ref name="ICZN1999_Chap2Article5"/: -->
1709:
to the tail of the phrase with edit summary "The word "binomium" was used in
Medieval Latin to mean a two-term expression in mathematics. (It's not sure how this word was form'd.)" Now it is
1538:: Reverted to restore the underscore, with edit summary "I see no reason to remove the underline, which is helpful in distinguishing "binomial" and "binominal", otherwise easily misread"
186:
1910:: Tried italicizing "n" to make it standout. Re-added citations right adjacent to the terms. Edit summary "Added extra deterrent against frequent removal of "binominal"". Now it is
2166:
1552:: Restoring the underscore with edit summary "underlining the "n" was originally a response to people not noticing that these were 2 different words, so I think it's worthwhile".
176:
776:
2171:
736:
685:
282:
1921:: Removed italicization with edit summary "The word binominal (close to the beginning of the page) has an italicized n, that seems unintentionally placed.". Sigh...
1363:), but for a reason. There is long history of the word "binominal" repeatedly getting removed from the lede. Allow me a few more days to research and elaborate. --
1214:
If there is such a standard, it would be nice to mention it in the article. If not, it might be useful to add examples of how various languages adress this issue.
793:
2161:
801:
1912:'''{{not a typo|binomi''n''al|reason=This is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature'''<ref name="ICZN1999_Chap2Article5"/: -->
1021:
One thing that seems to be missing from the article is what happens when a species is moved to another genus in which its specific name/epithet already exists.
153:
108:
69:
2136:
2037:
1648:
also called '''{{not a typo|binominal|reason=This is a well-known alternative spelling. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''' or '''binary nomenclature''',
1661:
also called '''{{not a typo|binominal|reason=This is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''' or '''binary nomenclature''',
1997:
To me, as a reader, the underscored version was helpful and worked well. I understood that it is a plain emphasis and did not mistake it as an "n" with a
916:
613:
390:
2246:
2186:
2181:
934:
272:
676:
499:
248:
1690:: Re-introduced underscore. Edit summary "as both previous and current experience shows, the underline is important in helping to stop 'corrections';
2241:
2226:
2196:
906:
603:
380:
702:
2211:
2146:
489:
1102:
Our article is about binomial nomenclature, not about the distribution of the number of species in genera, which is a matter of how taxonomists
797:
2251:
2231:
2201:
356:
232:
209:
137:
2216:
1496:
1127:
974:
1479:: Replacement of "binominal" to "binomial" in the whole main text. Re-introduced the underscore to "binominal". Added citations. Now it is
1447:: "'Binomial' is... a misnomer" (unsourced). Edit summary: "Clarification of the terms 'nomial', 'binomial', 'nominal', and 'binominal'."
465:
1441:: Removal of "binomial nomenclature" from the lede. Edit summary: "General tidy. Limit bold to headwords in lead para as per WP:MOSBOLD."
2176:
1255:
1883:
1219:
133:
2236:
2191:
2221:
1518:
1508:
1476:
1983:
since 2007), on the grounds that "the underscored 'n' is not standard
English and will mystify readers". A typical pattern goes
873:
834:
579:
566:
522:
347:
305:
2206:
2131:
1499:: Proposal "Binomial nomenclature → Binominal nomenclature". The result of the move request was: Not moved 13:43, 25 March 2010
452:
413:
44:
1215:
711:
149:
1698:
al|reason=This is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''' or '''binary nomenclature''',
1402:
al nomenclature''' (particularly in zoological circles) or '''binary nomenclature''' (particularly in botanical circles)
938:
1092:
1004:
100:
1839:
al|reason=This is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''' ("two-name naming system")
1713:
al|reason=This is the alternative name in the ICZN. Do not "correct" it.}} nomenclature''' ("two-name naming system")
1776:: Re-adding underscore. Edit summary "yet another attempt to "correct" this word shows why the underline was useful"
1866:' ICZN terminology paragraph, this edit rewrote "binominal name" to "binomial name" with the edit summary "(sp)".
983:
1290:
have only a handful (< 10) of known cases. I think there's a mistake here, but maybe I'm missing something.
1342:"binomi'N'al" with an "N" before the "al", which is not a typographic error, meaning "two-name naming system".
1131:
1062:
Sigward, J. D.; Sutton, M. D.; Bennett, K. D. (2018). "How big is a genus? Towards a nomothetic systematics".
769:
695:
50:
1484:
Diane
Schmidt and George H. Bell, '''', Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003, ISBN 1563089777, p. 4.</ref: -->
1969:
1957:
1949:
1939:
1924:
1918:
1907:
1899:
1889:
1869:
1859:
1851:
1845:
1828:
1818:
1810:
1793:
1360:
1325:
1274:
1259:
1239:
1147:
1111:
1026:
2112:
1785:
1779:
1773:
1767:
1763:
1756:
1748:
1731:
1723:
1717:
1702:
1687:
1679:
1665:
1656:
1652:
1643:
1625:
1610:
1602:
1593:
1585:
1579:
1566:
1555:
1549:
1543:
1535:
1529:
1504:
1470:
1464:
1458:
1450:
1444:
1438:
1427:
1413:
1406:
1395:
1088:
865:
244:
1106:
binomial nomenclature, not the nomenclature itself. So I don't see that the journal article is relevant.
2018:
1896:
template. Edit summary "m I removed some text which was most probably accidentally written by someone."
1877:
1863:
1512:
1349:
1187:
626:
464:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
247:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
121:
1931:
template to be more specific. Edit summary "Another attempt to deter frequent removal of "binominal"".
1481:
The formal system of naming ] is called '''binomial nomenclature''' (especially in botany,<ref: -->
1952:: Reverted to restore the phrase. Edit summary "Not a repetition, an alternate spelling (binomiNal)".
1344:" I feel it's explaining it too much. It's clunky and hard to read. Can we get rid of it altogether?
1164:? It results in 72 million hits in a Google search, compared to only 9 million for the fully written
113:
2044:
1637:
1546:: Removal of the underscore with edit summary "bold the subject please, no need to point out the n".
21:
1576:
because underline is for visual contrast in this context only, not generally accepted orthography".
537:
516:
125:
117:
1744:''Binomial nomenclature''' ("two-name naming system"), also called '''binominal nomenclature''' or
2103:
2060:
1368:
1321:
1270:
1235:
1143:
1107:
1022:
989:
759:
724:
145:
1739:
1045:
Binomial systematics is shown to be an excellent reflection of underlying evolutionary patterns.
1738:
template... Edit summary "Wikify, copy edit; he underscored n is not standard
English and will
2084:
Cantino, Philip D. (1998). "Binomials, Hyphenated
Uninomials, and Phylogenetic Nomenclature".
2011:
4 cases were when the word had the underscore (Case 1,3,4,5). One soon self reverted (Case 1).
1946:
template and citations. Their edit summary: "Repetition on the term "binomial nomenclature"".
2095:
1345:
1295:
1183:
1173:
1071:
985:
960:
1691:
1640:. Our readers do not generally have severe brain damage, so we don't write as if they did."
1605:: Reverted to restore the underscore. Edit summary "not spurious; clarifies not "binomial""
1254:
That is not an image in the beginning, it's just text. Please change it to a proper image.
1231:
2086:
882:
547:
1461:: Replacement of "binomial" to "binominal" in the whole main text, with no edit summary.
849:
828:
428:
407:
148:. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also
751:
719:
707:
553:
336:
237:
2125:
2056:
1825:
with edit summary "Made edit to inform users that the underlined N is not an error".
1633:
1364:
785:
781:
444:
241:
129:
1453:: Reverted. Edit summary: "from Medieval Latin, neuter of binomius having two names"
925:
1998:
1525:
al nomenclature''' or '''binary nomenclature''') is a formal system of naming ] of
1087:
I'm not sure if there's a good place for the reference in this article. Opinions?
2033:
Robust against people who don't read citations, templates, and embedded comments.
2005:. Anyway, even the underscore is insufficient to deter removals. Of the 7 cases,
1720:(Case 3): Zapped the whole phrase along with the template, with no edit summary.
987:
2064:
1902:: Reverted to restore the phrase. Edit summary "removed text was quite correct".
1372:
1353:
1329:
1307:
1299:
1291:
1278:
1263:
1243:
1223:
1191:
1177:
1169:
1151:
1135:
1115:
1096:
1075:
1030:
729:
141:
1782:: Removed the underscore of the "n" with edit summary "No need for underline".
330:
855:
543:
434:
326:
90:
2002:
1759:: Removal of underscore. Edit summary "Wikify: add comma, remove underscore"
94:
1398:: First mention of alternative terms, signifying the "n" with underscore.
1230:
transcription and of course a vernacular name. See, as just one example,
715:
224:
203:
2106:
1965:
meaning "two-name naming system".<ref name="ICZN1999_Glossary"/: -->
1598:(also called '''binominal nomenclature''' or '''binary nomenclature''')
1562:(also called '''binomiṉal nomenclature''' or '''binary nomenclature''')
575:
438:
352:
320:
299:
664:
140:
in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than
84:
63:
2152:
Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in
Biology and health sciences
1676:, ignoring the whole template comments. Edit summary "Fixed a typo".
878:
571:
461:
2099:
1848:(Case 5): Zapped the whole phrase and template with no explanation.
1621:
al nomenclature''' (note the letter N) or '''binary nomenclature''',
2008:
3 cases were when the word was without the underscore (Case 2,6,7).
570:, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
457:
1320:
I think this is more accurate (and avoids some false precision).
1934:("two-name naming system")<ref name="ICZN1999_Glossary"/: -->
1913:("two-name naming system")<ref name="ICZN1999_Glossary"/: -->
1632:, with edit summary "WP doesn't do either of those things. See
990:
954:
15:
2142:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Biology and health sciences
2027:
Prevent it mistakenly labeled or removed as "wrong spelling".
1835:, with edit summary "non-constructive (RW 16.1)". Now it is
1523:'''Binomial nomenclature''' (also called '''binomi<u: -->
1312:
you are quite right; well spotted! I've changed the text to
924:
351:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
1036:"Excellent reflection of underlying evolutionary patterns"
1886:: Removed the underscore of the "n" with no edit summary.
1582:: (Case 1) Removed the underscored "n". No edit summary.
1467:: Reverted them back to "binomial", with no edit summary.
2111:. Paywalled, but accessible via Knowledge (XXG) Library
652:
647:
642:
637:
1986:
Someone adds (re-adds) "binominal" with an underscore.
1409:: (First?) removal of underscore with no edit summary.
355:
on Knowledge (XXG). Leave messages on the WikiProject
2157:
C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1942:(Case 7): Zapped the whole phrase, together with the
1340:
In the end of the opening there's a part that reads "
112:, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on
1532:: Removal of the underscore with edit summary "cl".
456:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
236:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1497:
Talk:Binomial nomenclature/Archive 1#Requested move
1489:
the technically correct form in zoology<ref: -->
2024:Inform that "binominal" is also a legitimate term.
1854:: Reverted to restore the phrase. No edit summary.
1972:: This Talk page proposal "Too much explanation".
1892:(Case 6): Zapped the whole phrase, including the
1511:: Moved the citations out from the lede into the
161:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Evolutionary biology
2038:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Text formatting
1813:: Reverted to restore the "n". No edit summary.
1751:: Reverted to bring back the line and template.
1043:
2030:Prevent it mistakenly removed as "duplicates".
1992:A novice mistakes it as redundant and zaps it.
1734:: Removed the underscore but also removed the
1726:: Reverted to restore the phrase and template.
1400:The system is also called '''binomi<u: -->
998:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
2167:Low-importance Evolutionary biology articles
1711:also called '''{{not a typo|binomi<u: -->
1696:also called '''{{not a typo|binomi<u: -->
1596:: Edit summary "removed spurious underline".
877:, which collaborates on articles related to
1487:al nomenclature''' (since 1953,<ref: -->
2021:. Now the conditions we need to meet are:
1382:
823:
621:
511:
402:
294:
198:
58:
2172:WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
1064:Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
164:Template:WikiProject Evolutionary biology
1387:Timeline of edits pertaining "binominal"
1269:It was caused by a bad edit. Now fixed.
698:into articles about endangered species.
257:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Tree of Life
2075:
1483:but also used by zoologists<ref: -->
1054:
1008:when more than 10 sections are present.
825:
772:into articles about endangered species.
513:
404:
296:
200:
60:
19:
2137:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles
935:not associated with a particular field
2162:C-Class Evolutionary biology articles
1989:A copy editor removes the underscore.
116:and its associated subfields such as
7:
871:This article is within the scope of
450:This article is within the scope of
230:This article is within the scope of
891:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Systems
588:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Animals
365:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biology
49:It is of interest to the following
1168:. Should we change the text here?
794:Science collaboration of the month
578:. For more information, visit the
474:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Plants
134:evolutionary developmental biology
14:
2247:Unassessed field Systems articles
2187:WikiProject Tree of Life articles
2182:Low-importance taxonomic articles
1788:: Reverted to restore the phrase.
1682:: Reverted to restore "binominal"
1619:, also called '''binomi<u: -->
1002:may be automatically archived by
802:WikiProject Animals Collaboration
260:Template:WikiProject Tree of Life
1837:'''{{not a typo|binomi<u: -->
1575:. Edit summary "rv to <u: -->
1491:), or '''binary nomenclature'''.
959:
858:
848:
827:
663:
546:
536:
515:
437:
427:
406:
329:
319:
298:
223:
202:
154:WikiProject Evolutionary biology
150:Knowledge (XXG):Contributing FAQ
109:WikiProject Evolutionary biology
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
2242:Mid-importance Systems articles
2227:High-importance animal articles
2197:Mid-importance Biology articles
1802:with no explanation. Now it is
911:This article has been rated as
608:This article has been rated as
494:This article has been rated as
385:This article has been rated as
277:This article has been rated as
181:This article has been rated as
152:for more information) or visit
2212:High-importance plant articles
2147:C-Class level-4 vital articles
1560:with the unicode character ṉ".
1435:"binomial" vs "binominal" war
1:
2047:such as "note ...", "see ..."
1804:{{not a typo|binomi<u: -->
1798:{{not a typo|binomi<u: -->
1796:(Case 4): Removed the "n" in
1628:: Removed the underscore and
1330:09:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
1300:06:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
1244:17:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
1224:19:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
1178:06:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
1116:20:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
1097:15:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
712:Tool use by non-human animals
468:and see a list of open tasks.
251:and see a list of open tasks.
167:Evolutionary biology articles
2252:WikiProject Systems articles
2232:WikiProject Animals articles
2202:WikiProject Biology articles
1935:or '''binary nomenclature'''
1914:or '''binary nomenclature'''
1418:'''binominal nomenclature'''
1279:17:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
1264:14:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
937:. Fields are listed on the
894:Template:WikiProject Systems
591:Template:WikiProject Animals
368:Template:WikiProject Biology
2217:WikiProject Plants articles
1668:(Case 2): Removed the "n",
1613:: Unparethesized and added
1422:'''binomial nomenclature'''
1152:09:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
1136:00:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
477:Template:WikiProject Plants
101:Evolutionary biology portal
2268:
2177:C-Class taxonomic articles
1707:("two-name naming system")
1373:08:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
1354:21:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
1192:20:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
917:project's importance scale
614:project's importance scale
500:project's importance scale
391:project's importance scale
283:project's importance scale
187:project's importance scale
136:. It is distinct from the
2065:13:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
1831:: Reverted to remove the
1076:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx059
932:
910:
843:
798:Article Improvement Drive
770:GLAM/ARKive donated texts
696:GLAM/ARKive donated texts
620:
607:
531:
493:
422:
384:
314:
276:
218:
180:
78:
57:
2237:C-Class Systems articles
2192:C-Class Biology articles
1521:: Major rewrite of lede.
1495:2010-03-18...2010-03-25
1216:JonathanHopeThisIsUnique
233:WikiProject Tree of Life
138:WikiProject Tree of Life
106:This article is part of
2222:C-Class animal articles
1477:2010-03-13...2010-03-18
1031:09:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
564:is within the scope of
2207:C-Class plant articles
2132:C-Class vital articles
1927:: Reworded inside the
1670:{{not a typo|binominal
1558:: "replaced <u: -->
1485:), '''binomi<u: -->
1416:: Vandalism replacing
1122:T. rex most well known
1047:
1005:Lowercase sigmabot III
929:
866:Systems science portal
2094:(2). Wiley: 425–429.
2019:designed by committee
1876:template also to the
1674:{{not a typo|binomial
928:
728:(a species in family
561:Binomial nomenclature
343:Binomial nomenclature
122:quantitative genetics
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
36:level-4 vital article
1361:I wrote that version
1336:Too much explanation
625:WikiProject Animals
158:Evolutionary biology
114:evolutionary biology
70:Evolutionary biology
1630:(note the letter N)
1615:(note the letter N)
1571:'''binomi<u: -->
1569:: Replaced back to
874:WikiProject Systems
567:WikiProject Animals
348:WikiProject Biology
126:molecular evolution
118:population genetics
1573:al nomenclature'''
930:
791:Nominate and vote:
760:Zaniolepis frenata
725:Sphaerium beckmani
453:WikiProject Plants
263:taxonomic articles
45:content assessment
2082:example: p429 of
1978:
1977:
1872:: Introduced the
1182:Definetly should
1166:Tyrannosaurus rex
1089:Nitpicking polish
1017:Missing material?
1012:
1011:
953:
952:
949:
948:
945:
944:
822:
821:
818:
817:
814:
813:
810:
809:
510:
509:
506:
505:
401:
400:
397:
396:
293:
292:
289:
288:
197:
196:
193:
192:
2259:
2115:
2110:
2080:
1945:
1930:
1895:
1875:
1834:
1824:
1807:
1801:
1770:: test graffiti)
1737:
1708:
1675:
1671:
1631:
1616:
1574:
1423:
1419:
1383:
1311:
1080:
1079:
1059:
1007:
991:
963:
955:
933:This article is
899:
898:
897:Systems articles
895:
892:
889:
868:
863:
862:
861:
852:
845:
844:
839:
831:
824:
667:
659:
658:
622:
596:
595:
592:
589:
586:
556:
551:
550:
540:
533:
532:
527:
519:
512:
482:
481:
478:
475:
472:
447:
442:
441:
431:
424:
423:
418:
410:
403:
373:
372:
371:Biology articles
369:
366:
363:
339:
334:
333:
323:
316:
315:
310:
302:
295:
265:
264:
261:
258:
255:
227:
220:
219:
214:
206:
199:
169:
168:
165:
162:
159:
103:
98:
97:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
2267:
2266:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2100:10.2307/1223773
2087:Taxon (journal)
2083:
2081:
2077:
1979:
1966:
1943:
1936:
1928:
1915:
1893:
1873:
1840:
1832:
1822:
1803:
1797:
1745:
1740:mystify readers
1735:
1714:
1706:
1699:
1673:
1669:
1662:
1649:
1629:
1622:
1614:
1599:
1570:
1563:
1526:
1492:
1421:
1417:
1403:
1388:
1338:
1305:
1287:
1252:
1204:
1124:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1038:
1019:
1003:
992:
986:
968:
896:
893:
890:
887:
886:
883:systems science
864:
859:
857:
837:
806:
657:
610:High-importance
594:animal articles
593:
590:
587:
584:
583:
552:
545:
526:High‑importance
525:
496:High-importance
479:
476:
473:
470:
469:
443:
436:
417:High‑importance
416:
370:
367:
364:
361:
360:
345:is part of the
335:
328:
308:
262:
259:
256:
253:
252:
212:
166:
163:
160:
157:
156:
99:
92:
72:
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
2265:
2263:
2255:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2124:
2123:
2117:
2116:
2074:
2073:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:Not too clunky
2048:
2041:
2034:
2031:
2028:
2025:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2009:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1990:
1987:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1967:
1961:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1937:
1932:
1922:
1916:
1911:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1887:
1881:
1867:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1836:
1833:(Not an error)
1823:(Not an error)
1816:
1815:
1814:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1777:
1771:
1760:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1743:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1715:
1710:
1700:
1695:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1663:
1660:
1650:
1647:
1641:
1623:
1618:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1597:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:: Self revert.
1577:
1564:
1561:
1553:
1547:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1527:
1522:
1516:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1493:
1480:
1474:
1468:
1462:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1442:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1410:
1404:
1399:
1390:
1389:
1386:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1375:
1359:Clunky it is (
1337:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1155:
1154:
1128:199.212.55.162
1123:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1105:
1082:
1081:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1037:
1034:
1018:
1015:
1010:
1009:
997:
994:
993:
988:
984:
982:
979:
978:
970:
969:
964:
958:
951:
950:
947:
946:
943:
942:
931:
921:
920:
913:Mid-importance
909:
903:
902:
900:
870:
869:
853:
841:
840:
838:Mid‑importance
832:
820:
819:
816:
815:
812:
811:
808:
807:
805:
804:
788:
773:
764:
763:
762:
754:
752:Campocraspedon
749:Invertebrates:
746:
733:
720:Animal suicide
708:Photoperiodism
699:
690:
673:Here are some
672:
670:
668:
656:
655:
650:
645:
640:
634:
631:
630:
618:
617:
606:
600:
599:
597:
558:
557:
554:Animals portal
541:
529:
528:
520:
508:
507:
504:
503:
492:
486:
485:
483:
480:plant articles
466:the discussion
449:
448:
432:
420:
419:
411:
399:
398:
395:
394:
387:Mid-importance
383:
377:
376:
374:
341:
340:
337:Biology portal
324:
312:
311:
309:Mid‑importance
303:
291:
290:
287:
286:
279:Low-importance
275:
269:
268:
266:
249:the discussion
228:
216:
215:
213:Low‑importance
207:
195:
194:
191:
190:
183:Low-importance
179:
173:
172:
170:
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2264:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2129:
2127:
2113:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2088:
2079:
2076:
2072:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2049:
2046:
2042:
2039:
2035:
2032:
2029:
2026:
2023:
2022:
2020:
2015:
2010:
2007:
2006:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1991:
1988:
1985:
1984:
1981:
1980:
1971:
1968:
1959:
1956:
1951:
1948:
1947:
1941:
1938:
1926:
1923:
1920:
1917:
1909:
1906:
1901:
1898:
1897:
1891:
1888:
1885:
1882:
1879:
1871:
1868:
1865:
1861:
1858:
1853:
1850:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1830:
1827:
1826:
1820:
1817:
1812:
1809:
1808:
1795:
1792:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1781:
1778:
1775:
1772:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1750:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1733:
1730:
1725:
1722:
1721:
1719:
1716:
1704:
1701:
1694:". Now it is
1693:
1689:
1686:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1667:
1664:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1634:MOS:UNDERLINE
1627:
1624:
1612:
1609:
1604:
1601:
1600:
1595:
1592:
1587:
1584:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1568:
1565:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1548:
1545:
1542:
1537:
1534:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1520:
1517:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1503:
1498:
1494:
1490:</ref: -->
1488:</ref: -->
1482:</ref: -->
1478:
1475:
1472:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1460:
1457:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1434:
1429:
1426:
1425:
1415:
1411:
1408:
1405:
1397:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1385:
1384:
1376:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1322:Peter coxhead
1319:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:Peter coxhead
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1256:111.88.15.184
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1236:Peter coxhead
1233:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1201:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:Peter coxhead
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:Peter coxhead
1103:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1077:
1073:
1070:(2): 237252.
1069:
1065:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1046:
1042:
1041:distribution.
1035:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:Peter coxhead
1016:
1014:
1006:
1001:
996:
995:
981:
980:
977:
976:
972:
971:
967:
962:
957:
956:
940:
939:template page
936:
927:
923:
922:
918:
914:
908:
905:
904:
901:
884:
880:
876:
875:
867:
856:
854:
851:
847:
846:
842:
836:
833:
830:
826:
803:
799:
795:
792:
789:
787:
786:Atka mackerel
783:
782:Junqueira cow
780:
778:
774:
771:
768:
765:
761:
758:
755:
753:
750:
747:
745:
742:
741:
740:
738:
734:
731:
727:
726:
721:
717:
713:
709:
706:
704:
700:
697:
694:
691:
689:
687:
683:
682:
680:
679:
678:
671:
669:
666:
661:
660:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
635:
633:
632:
628:
624:
623:
619:
615:
611:
605:
602:
601:
598:
581:
577:
573:
569:
568:
563:
562:
555:
549:
544:
542:
539:
535:
534:
530:
524:
521:
518:
514:
501:
497:
491:
488:
487:
484:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
446:
445:Plants portal
440:
435:
433:
430:
426:
425:
421:
415:
412:
409:
405:
392:
388:
382:
379:
378:
375:
358:
354:
350:
349:
344:
338:
332:
327:
325:
322:
318:
317:
313:
307:
304:
301:
297:
284:
280:
274:
271:
270:
267:
250:
246:
243:
239:
235:
234:
229:
226:
222:
221:
217:
211:
208:
205:
201:
188:
184:
178:
175:
174:
171:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
130:phylogenetics
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
96:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2114:(very slow).
2091:
2085:
2078:
2070:
2036:Comply with
1999:macron below
1944:{{not a typo
1929:{{not a typo
1894:{{not a typo
1874:{{not a typo
1838:n</u: -->
1799:n</u: -->
1736:{{not a typo
1712:n</u: -->
1697:n</u: -->
1620:n</u: -->
1572:n</u: -->
1559:n</u: -->
1524:n</u: -->
1486:n</u: -->
1401:n</u: -->
1341:
1339:
1288:
1285:Hemihomonyms
1253:
1232:this extract
1213:
1209:
1205:
1165:
1162:Homo sapiens
1161:
1125:
1086:
1067:
1063:
1057:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1020:
1013:
999:
973:
965:
912:
872:
790:
775:
766:
756:
748:
743:
735:
723:
701:
692:
684:
675:
674:
662:
609:
580:project page
565:
560:
559:
495:
451:
386:
346:
342:
278:
254:Tree of Life
245:tree of life
242:phylogenetic
231:
210:Tree of Life
182:
107:
51:WikiProjects
34:
1805:</u: -->
1617:. Now it is
1346:CheeseyHead
1184:CheeseyHead
1160:What about
730:Sphaeriidae
142:systematics
2126:Categories
2071:References
2045:WP:SELFREF
1970:2024-03-16
1958:2023-11-06
1950:2023-11-06
1940:2023-11-06
1925:2023-07-03
1919:2023-07-02
1908:2023-03-29
1900:2023-03-28
1890:2023-03-28
1884:2023-02-07
1870:2022-06-12
1860:2022-06-12
1852:2022-04-04
1846:2022-04-04
1829:2021-03-18
1819:2021-03-18
1811:2021-03-09
1794:2021-03-09
1786:2020-01-08
1780:2020-01-07
1774:2019-02-19
1768:2019-02-19
1764:2019-02-19
1757:2019-02-14
1749:2018-11-05
1732:2018-11-05
1724:2018-05-02
1718:2018-05-02
1703:2018-03-30
1688:2018-01-07
1680:2018-01-07
1666:2018-01-07
1657:2017-12-20
1653:2017-12-20
1644:2017-12-20
1638:WP:SELFREF
1626:2017-12-20
1611:2017-12-19
1603:2017-07-30
1594:2017-07-30
1586:2014-05-27
1580:2014-05-27
1567:2013-02-25
1556:2013-02-20
1550:2012-01-25
1544:2012-01-25
1536:2011-10-14
1530:2011-10-14
1519:2011-06-14
1509:2011-06-16
1505:2011-06-13
1471:2010-02-24
1465:2010-02-24
1459:2010-02-24
1451:2009-12-17
1445:2009-12-16
1439:2009-09-07
1428:2009-03-16
1414:2009-03-16
1407:2008-04-08
1396:2007-05-31
1050:References
677:Open Tasks
2003:hyperlink
1862:: In the
1430:: Revert)
1250:Image bug
357:talk page
39:is rated
2057:Wotheina
1880:section.
1821:: Added
1705:: Moved
1515:section.
1378:removed:
1365:Wotheina
1202:Question
1000:365 days
966:Archives
744:Mammals:
737:Requests
716:Omnivore
686:Copyedit
240:and the
238:taxonomy
146:taxonomy
2107:1223773
915:on the
888:Systems
879:systems
835:Systems
757:Fishes:
703:Improve
643:history
612:on the
585:Animals
576:zoology
572:animals
523:Animals
498:on the
389:on the
362:Biology
353:biology
306:Biology
281:on the
185:on the
41:C-class
2043:Avoid
1878:#Codes
1864:#Codes
1692:WP:IAR
1513:#Codes
1308:DKMell
1292:DKMell
1170:DKMell
777:Expand
767:Merge:
693:Merge:
471:Plants
462:botany
458:plants
414:Plants
132:, and
47:scale.
2104:JSTOR
2001:or a
1659:makes
1420:with
653:purge
648:watch
627:To-do
28:This
2061:talk
1655:and
1369:talk
1350:talk
1326:talk
1296:talk
1275:talk
1260:talk
1240:talk
1220:talk
1188:talk
1174:talk
1148:talk
1132:talk
1112:talk
1093:talk
1027:talk
881:and
638:edit
604:High
574:and
490:High
460:and
144:and
2096:doi
1963:-->
1806:al|
1800:al|
1672:to
1104:use
1072:doi
1068:183
907:Mid
732:),
381:Mid
273:Low
177:Low
2128::
2102:.
2092:47
2090:.
2063:)
2055:--
1766:,
1742:".
1636:,
1507:,
1424:.
1371:)
1352:)
1328:)
1298:)
1277:)
1262:)
1242:)
1234:.
1222:)
1190:)
1176:)
1150:)
1134:)
1114:)
1095:)
1066:.
1029:)
800:,
796:,
784:,
722:,
718:,
714:,
710:,
128:,
124:,
120:,
2109:.
2098::
2059:(
2040:.
1762:(
1412:(
1367:(
1348:(
1324:(
1310::
1306:@
1294:(
1273:(
1258:(
1238:(
1218:(
1186:(
1172:(
1146:(
1130:(
1110:(
1091:(
1078:.
1074::
1025:(
975:1
941:.
919:.
885:.
779::
739::
705::
688::
681::
629::
616:.
582:.
502:.
393:.
359:.
285:.
189:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
