106:. This article does not add anything new, so its existence is unnecessary. Also, this article happens to include a lot of nonsense speculation (Casualty estimates? What are these numbers based on?) and some downright incorrect information (The Gene Worm was not in command of Race X, Race X wasn't working with the Nihilanth, etc).
21:
If this article is going to remain then it really needs a lot of work. For a start, where have all these numbers come from? Approx. 10,000 Xenians? What exactly is that number based on. The whole of Race X was destroyed...how? Is this article even needed, it could it be merged with a larger article
45:
The results of the Black Mesa
Incident were massive. The HECU who stormed the facility took enormous casualties, an estimated 400 dead, 500 wounded and a similar number missing in action (mainly due to the nuclear bomb). The relatively small inter-dimensional rift caused portal storms all over the
150:
I agree. In addition this article is quite poor right now in terms of style. There is an awful lot of repetition. Not to mention nonsense such as a paragraph which can be summarised as "the following people survived but some of them might not have"....
87:
Look I say that if someone can re-work the information, and get rid of some of these statistics, everything should be okay. I mean I dont see a reason for deleting all of it. Lord of the Rings and Star Trek has their own battle articles.
137:
I agree. There isn't any need for this article. Relevant information from this article (certainly not all of it; most of it seems based on pure fan speculation, at best) should be merged into the
31:
Hmm, yes I suppose thats a really good point. I'll email Valve and see if they can give 'any' info on the matter. Otherwise it should just be deleted.
117:
64:
I'm all for deletion of fancruft, or at least merging it, but I don't think it is a candidate for speedy deletion. This needs to be taken to
138:
121:
103:
99:
128:
77:
48:
152:
125:
69:
107:
120:. I have removed the speedy deletion tag. Merging anything useful from this article to
65:
89:
32:
155:
145:
142:
131:
110:
92:
82:
51:
35:
26:
23:
124:
and changing this to a redirect might be a better answer.
8:
98:All this information is already covered in
118:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
7:
14:
1:
156:15:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
146:01:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
139:Black Mesa Research Facility
132:01:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
122:Black Mesa Research Facility
116:"Fancruft" is not listed on
111:01:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
100:Black Mesa Research Facility
93:11:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
83:00:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
36:01:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
27:05:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
174:
52:04:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
104:"The Black Mesa Incident"
60:Contest of Speedy Delete
17:Made Up Information
81:
165:
75:
41:Not to mention:
173:
172:
168:
167:
166:
164:
163:
162:
62:
19:
12:
11:
5:
171:
169:
161:
160:
159:
158:
126:Angus McLellan
114:
113:
61:
58:
57:
56:
55:
54:
49:24.196.115.179
22:in some form?
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
170:
157:
154:
149:
148:
147:
144:
140:
136:
135:
134:
133:
130:
127:
123:
119:
112:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
95:
94:
91:
85:
84:
79:
74:
72:
67:
59:
53:
50:
47:
43:
42:
40:
39:
38:
37:
34:
29:
28:
25:
16:
115:
86:
70:
63:
44:
30:
20:
108:MarphyBlack
153:Thermaland
73:retford
129:(Talk)
102:under
90:Brad92
46:Earth,
33:Brad92
143:Qjuad
24:Qjuad
78:talk
71:tghe
68:. --
66:AfD
141:.
80:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.