Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Blond Bombers/GA1

Source 📝

584: 515: 491: 464: 454: 429: 415: 401: 370: 356: 295:
been policy to add a quantifier such as "(professional wrestling)" unless there is an existing article about a different subject that shares the name. I don't think it's necessary to add one now, but I'm not opposed to it down the road if articles are written about Blond Bombers from other sports. As for images, I've looked for free use images, but they don't seem to exist for any of these wrestlers.
560: 546: 294:
I added a section about Lane and St. John (which was quite enjoyable, as I previously only knew of Stan Lane's other three tag teams). I added as much information as I could find about the date of Latham and Farris. I replaced the dead link and added some external links. As for the name, it has never
278:
Thanks for the review. Although I was sure I had searched everywhere for more teams known as the Blond/Blonde Bombers. The link you provided is quite right. Stan Lane and Bryan St. John apparently also used the name. They were only together for a little over a year, but it's definitely still worth
279:
making a section for them, and I have some good sources available. I have replaced the dead link (the company seems to have moved its information to a different domain name but kept it all intact). I'll try to get these issues resolved over the weekend. Thanks again,
115:
I find the article to be mostly well written, I made some minor edits to improve the readability. Please check to make sure that I entered no errors.
264:
Given the notability of the subject, I think this article should meet the good article criteria if the few points mentioned above are addressed.
66: 334: 328: 104: 62: 538: 47: 421: 39: 142:
which was dead when examined. I have placed a tag. I was unable to establish how theses references met the standards of
362: 185:
I also feel that an external links section might be a good idea, if suitable links not previously used can be found.
176: 146:, but in the context of a sport/entertainment not well covered in mainstream media, I judge them to be acceptable. 387: 300: 284: 309:
Ok, well done for your hard work. I am prepared to pass the article as all concerns have been addressed.
314: 269: 250: 245:
No images are used in this article. Have you tried to source some acceptable, i.e. free license images?
231: 212: 190: 151: 123: 94: 86: 138: 296: 280: 528: 55: 17: 173: 477: 178:
it appears to be a nickname for baseball players. Have you considered moving the article to
310: 265: 246: 227: 208: 186: 147: 119: 90: 82: 552: 172:
appears to reference other teams known variously as Blond or Blonde Bombers. In this link
407: 143: 32: 226:
The article is stable with the majority of edits by the creator and nominator.
170: 318: 304: 288: 273: 254: 235: 216: 194: 155: 127: 118:
Larry Latham and Wayne Farris : Can you cite a date when they were paired?
98: 175:
the term is used to describe the Australian Cricket team. In this link
137:
I find the article well referenced, with the exception of ref #16 <
139:
http://www.kappapublishing.com/wrestling/pages/wrestlingframe.html
103:
The subheadings below relate to the Good Article criteria at
74: 43: 105:
WP:Reviewing_good_articles#How_to_review_an_article
204:I hame happy that this artcile conforms to a 8: 537:(images are tagged and non-free images have 107:and I shall place comments as I proceed. 563:Not applicable - no images at present 7: 532:, where possible and appropriate. 24: 582: 558: 544: 513: 489: 486:Fair representation without bias 462: 452: 427: 413: 399: 368: 354: 241:Compliance with image use policy 559: 545: 1: 180:Blond Bombers (Pro Wrestling) 583: 514: 490: 463: 453: 428: 414: 400: 369: 355: 607: 319:13:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 305:05:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 289:01:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 274:01:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 255:00:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 236:00:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 217:00:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 195:01:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 169:. This link for instance 156:00:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 128:00:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 99:23:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 344:reasonably well written 551:(appropriate use with 526:It is illustrated by 478:neutral point of view 442:broad in its coverage 206:Neutral Point of View 165:I have doubts about 539:fair use rationales 182:or a similar name? 383:factually accurate 18:Talk:Blond Bombers 553:suitable captions 510:No edit wars etc. 81:Starting Review. 598: 586: 585: 562: 561: 548: 547: 517: 516: 493: 492: 466: 465: 456: 455: 431: 430: 417: 416: 408:reliable sources 403: 402: 372: 371: 358: 357: 133:Factual accuracy 79: 70: 51: 606: 605: 601: 600: 599: 597: 596: 595: 475:It follows the 449:(major aspects) 262: 243: 224: 202: 163: 135: 113: 60: 37: 31: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 604: 602: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 406:(citations to 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 339: 338: 324: 323: 322: 321: 297:GaryColemanFan 281:GaryColemanFan 261: 258: 242: 239: 223: 220: 201: 198: 167:broad coverage 162: 161:Broad coverage 159: 134: 131: 112: 109: 80: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 603: 588: 587: 580: 577: 576: 574: 571: 565: 564: 556: 554: 542: 540: 534: 533: 531: 530: 525: 519: 518: 511: 508: 507: 505: 501: 495: 494: 487: 484: 483: 481: 479: 474: 468: 467: 460: 450: 446: 445: 443: 439: 433: 432: 425: 423: 411: 409: 397: 393: 392: 390: 389: 384: 380: 374: 373: 366: 364: 352: 348: 347: 345: 341: 340: 337:for criteria) 336: 332: 330: 326: 325: 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 293: 292: 291: 290: 286: 282: 276: 275: 271: 267: 259: 257: 256: 252: 248: 240: 238: 237: 233: 229: 221: 219: 218: 214: 210: 207: 199: 197: 196: 192: 188: 183: 181: 177: 174: 171: 168: 160: 158: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 132: 130: 129: 125: 121: 116: 111:Writing style 110: 108: 106: 101: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 78: 77: 73: 68: 64: 59: 58: 54: 49: 45: 41: 36: 35: 26: 19: 578: 572: 550: 536: 527: 509: 503: 485: 476: 458: 448: 441: 419: 405: 396:(references) 395: 386: 382: 360: 350: 343: 327: 277: 263: 244: 225: 205: 203: 184: 179: 166: 164: 136: 117: 114: 102: 75: 71: 57:Article talk 56: 52: 33: 30: 311:Jezhotwells 266:Jezhotwells 247:Jezhotwells 228:Jezhotwells 209:Jezhotwells 187:Jezhotwells 148:Jezhotwells 120:Jezhotwells 91:Jezhotwells 83:Jezhotwells 44:visual edit 388:verifiable 579:Pass/Fail 459:(focused) 222:Stability 27:GA Review 573:Overall 351:(prose) 260:Summary 67:history 48:history 34:Article 529:images 504:stable 502:It is 480:policy 440:It is 381:It is 342:It is 331:review 333:(see 144:WP:RS 141:: --> 76:Watch 16:< 385:and 335:here 315:talk 301:talk 285:talk 270:talk 251:talk 232:talk 213:talk 200:NPOV 191:talk 152:talk 124:talk 95:talk 87:talk 63:edit 40:edit 363:MoS 581:: 575:: 557:: 549:b 543:: 535:a 512:: 506:. 488:: 482:. 461:: 457:b 451:: 447:a 444:. 426:: 422:OR 418:c 412:: 404:b 398:: 394:a 391:. 367:: 359:b 353:: 349:a 346:. 329:GA 317:) 303:) 287:) 272:) 253:) 234:) 215:) 193:) 154:) 126:) 97:) 65:| 46:| 42:| 555:) 541:) 424:) 420:( 410:) 365:) 361:( 313:( 299:( 283:( 268:( 249:( 230:( 211:( 189:( 150:( 122:( 93:( 89:) 85:( 72:· 69:) 61:( 53:· 50:) 38:(

Index

Talk:Blond Bombers
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Jezhotwells
talk
Jezhotwells
talk
23:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
WP:Reviewing_good_articles#How_to_review_an_article
Jezhotwells
talk
00:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
http://www.kappapublishing.com/wrestling/pages/wrestlingframe.html
WP:RS
Jezhotwells
talk
00:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)



Jezhotwells
talk
01:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Jezhotwells

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.