392:
285:
21:
168:
275:
248:
217:
107:
663:"By early morning of January 10, the pressure at the strong cyclone's center had fallen to 926 millibars (27.3 inHg) near 58.5N 18W as it slowed its northeast motion." - again, there is improper antecedent usage. Grammatically, the main noun is "pressure", so it reads "the pressure had fallen as it slowed its northeast motion". Pretty minor, but the writing could be spiffied up.
439:
623:
The 2nd paragraph of the MH begins by talking about "the new low", but that was only mentioned briefly once in the first paragraph. IDK, when I was reading it, I didn't get a good sense of flow. Two other issues with the opening sentence. It says "to its south" without a clear antecedent, and it also
800:
Wikilinked to the stub weather ship article. They're exactly what they claim to be...ships in specific locations that are out there for the sole purpose of taking weather observations at sea. They were active from the 1940s into the 1980s, before being replaced with weather buoys. To help support
861:
All the articles state about the system is that its central pressure was estimated from the surface analyses available. At work, when this system has been mentioned in passing, they mentioned a figure closer to 910 mb, but without a reliable pressure measurement near the center, it's impossible to
564:
IDK, I just figured that km should be the primary unit, since it affected Europe, and then mph would be in parenthesis. I'm not really familiar with extratropical storm articles, but I think the logic is the same as with tropical cyclones, that the public never uses knots, nor nmi. --♫
1032:
Much better. Just quick question now - did the storm actually cause the snow? The article mentions snow only once, saying "The wind combined with the snowfall to the north led to blizzards across most of
Scotland." It's not clarified whether the storm actually caused it. --♫
1462:
It was not recorded at sea level. The station is at an altitude of 225 metres (738 ft) above sea level. Sea level pressure would be at 924 mbar. While extremely deep, not record breaking (there is a possibility that a sub-914 mbar was recorded out to sea, this is
955:
Most importantly, I guess, what meteorological conditions allowed the storm to attain such a record low pressure? You mention the low forming to its south, and that seems to be the only meteorological detail other than what the pressure was and where the low
1015:"The wind combined with the snowfall led to blizzards across most of Scotland" - did the storm cause snowfall? If so, that sentence is the only indication on there being any snow. Even if not, more clarification is needed.
628:
I tried to explain the second low's development better by rewording a couple of the lines. I was attempting to go in chronological order, but I can see how this is confusing to the reader. How do you suggest I proceed?
1104:"Thunderstorms were observed despite the near-freezing readings" - similar to the above, that is the only mention of temperature. Did the cyclone cause lower than normal temperatures? If so, that should be mentioned.
1524:
401:
258:
1489:
1391:
1194:
Well, I'm very glad I didn't fail it! Thank you for your quick work. There are just a few small things I'd like to see clarified a bit more. Then I'll be glad to pass it. --♫
1544:
406:
1549:
477:
321:
316:
606:
It is just the location the storm was at during that time. I went ahead and provided a more generic location, since it was located far from any land location.
1539:
467:
346:
995:"The sign of the North Atlantic Oscillation switched from positive to weakly negative during the lifetime of this storm" - what is the significance of that?
444:
1459:
It is still unofficial. As far as I know, no metrological agency has confirmed it has the lowest pressure on record. We will have to wait on it and see.
960:
Um, no. Earlier on in the article, the strength of the upper level jet and unusually strong SST gradient in its vicinity were mentioned as factors.
1534:
382:
372:
336:
32:
1490:
https://web.archive.org/web/20221018181915/https://amrc.ssec.wisc.edu/data/view-data.php?action=view_text_file&product=surface/awstext/8930.txt
1519:
1554:
341:
326:
128:
1434:
495:
90:
50:
876:
You should probably clarify in the article that the pressure is estimated. The current wording makes it look like it was recorded. --♫
1529:
550:
It was an ocean storm, so knots made sense. Plus, all the references use knots. If you want me to convert the knots to mph, I can.
331:
857:
Also, you say the buoys can't record pressures lower than 925, so how was the pressure of 914 recorded? The article never says that.
449:
1482:
1514:
1384:
202:
180:
472:
198:
194:
190:
186:
38:
309:
298:
253:
1399:
228:
836:"Weather buoys in the region with an identifiers of 44746 and 64043" - dumb question, but is "an identifiers" correct?
139:
1472:
703:
It was output from the convert template. Did you want me to qualify the coding to specify abbreviations instead?
775:
Speaking of linking, you link
Iceland the second time you mention it, and not the first. Consistency would be good
1305:
1414:
1395:
1217:
1200:
1168:
1152:
1146:
I'm tempted to fail it, but I'll put it on hold instead, since my issues might well be easy to address. --♫
1083:
1039:
980:
882:
821:
723:
672:
649:
571:
512:
491:
666:
Also, I noticed it here and elsewhere, but when you say "early morning", is that UTC, or local time? --♫
1496:
1468:
234:
147:
121:
20:
913:"However, the system began to weaken, and by evening" - it doesn't indicate by the evening of what date
1163:
Also, I'm not sure why the conversion template is not working properly, but 930 hPa is not 27.0 inHg.
167:
1467:
So for now, don't change the Braer Storm to the second most intense extratropical cyclone on record.
1301:
1283:
1269:
1232:
1182:
1134:
1113:
1068:
1054:
1023:
1004:
965:
943:
922:
897:
867:
845:
806:
784:
763:
738:
708:
687:
634:
611:
586:
555:
536:
151:
391:
1485:
2 PARTE SINOPSIS GENERAL A LAS: 09:00UTC DEPRESION 905HPA 70S 90W MOV S WKN EXP 73S 90W EL 18/0600
1420:
284:
106:
1319:
Is there some reason "of
January 1993" is necessary? I propose that this article be moved to just
1363:
1339:
1212:
1195:
1164:
1147:
1078:
1034:
975:
877:
816:
718:
667:
644:
566:
507:
1483:
https://web.archive.org/web/20221017115552/https://www.smn.gob.ar/pronostico-antartico/maritimo
42:
1211:
Also, really minor, but could you split "Preparations and impact" into two paragraph? ;) --♫
1492:
1452:
1448:
1324:
1279:
1265:
1228:
1178:
1130:
1109:
1064:
1050:
1019:
1000:
961:
939:
918:
893:
863:
841:
802:
780:
759:
734:
704:
683:
630:
607:
582:
551:
532:
308:
and related subjects on
Knowledge. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
1380:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
290:
155:
1508:
1355:
1331:
1254:
1455:, Antarctica. While yes, this is lower that the Brear Storm, there are two caveats.
1018:
Per newly-found reference, added more about the weather that day in Great
Britain.
1320:
274:
247:
1323:
since it's not like there are other storms with the same name. Courtesy ping:
280:
717:
Yea, I'd suggest the same if you had "kilometre" written out every time. --♫
1488:
2. Lowest measured station pressure was 888.0hPa which converts to 914.2hPa
174:
115:
498:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1250:
1249:
Was the storm named after the oil tanker? If so, is there a reference?--
304:
1413:
OK, so we have the wind gusts, but what were the actual wind speeds?
602:"as it passed 52.5N 30W" - what is the significance of that location?
1500:
1476:
1437:
1403:
1369:
1345:
1309:
1287:
1273:
1258:
1236:
1222:
1205:
1186:
1172:
1157:
1138:
1129:
Added a line about its cause of the oil spill's rapid dispersion.
1117:
1088:
1072:
1058:
1044:
1027:
1008:
985:
969:
947:
926:
901:
887:
871:
849:
826:
810:
788:
767:
742:
728:
712:
691:
677:
654:
638:
615:
590:
576:
559:
540:
517:
1177:
Added another significant figure, so the values look better now.
1108:
The addition of info about the NAO should address this concern.
1481:
1. Servicio
Meteorológico Nacional (Argentina) estimated 905hPa
1376:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1264:
I would assume so, but i dont know that there's a source for it.
801:
this article, I'm somewhat expanding the weather ship article.
210:
754:
Maybe link to something when you say "hurricane-force winds"
390:
624:
says "had dropped"? There is no context to use such wording
700:
Is there a reason you spell out "millibar" every time?
83:
1525:
Knowledge Did you know articles that are good articles
1351:
As there was no objection, I have moved the article.
173:
Facts from this article were featured on
Knowledge's
1049:Another attempt was made to clarify the situation.
114:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's
1390:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
8:
154:ever known to have existed in the northern
1545:Top-importance Non-tropical storm articles
974:Much better with the current wording. --♫
427:
242:
62:
15:
1550:WikiProject Non-tropical storms articles
1447:As you may have seen, a weather station
1125:Did anything happen with the oil spill?
458:
430:
244:
1278:Got one through the mail this morning.
7:
1540:GA-Class Non-tropical storm articles
496:Talk:Braer Storm of January 1993/GA1
296:This article is within the scope of
216:
214:
233:It is of interest to the following
1300:What does the word/name signify?--
547:Is there a reason mph is avoided?
402:the Non-tropical storms task force
14:
41:. If you can improve it further,
1443:About the recent Antarctic storm
283:
273:
246:
215:
166:
105:
19:
1535:Top-importance Weather articles
581:Good point. It is addressed.
377:This article has been rated as
1520:Natural sciences good articles
934:Where did the storm dissipate?
33:Natural sciences good articles
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1449:recorded an 897-mbar pressure
1438:22:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
999:Addressed the significance.
399:This article is supported by
357:Knowledge:WikiProject Weather
1555:WikiProject Weather articles
1477:22:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
1404:09:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
1370:17:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
1310:02:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
1274:04:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
1259:13:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
1237:16:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1223:16:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1206:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1187:15:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1173:01:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1158:06:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
1139:14:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1118:15:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1089:17:26, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1073:17:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1059:17:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1045:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1028:14:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1009:14:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
986:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
970:14:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
948:14:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
927:15:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
902:16:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
888:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
872:14:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
850:14:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
827:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
811:16:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
789:14:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
768:14:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
743:17:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
729:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
713:14:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
692:16:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
678:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
655:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
639:14:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
616:14:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
591:17:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
577:16:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
560:14:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
541:14:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
518:06:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
360:Template:WikiProject Weather
1501:00:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
1346:17:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
140:Braer Storm of January 1993
135:The text of the entry was:
1571:
1385:Braer Storm 1993-01-11.gif
1288:16:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
383:project's importance scale
137:Did you know ... that the
1530:GA-Class Weather articles
796:What is a "weather ship"?
643:I changed it anyway. --♫
527:Where did the storm form?
398:
376:
268:
241:
65:
61:
302:, which collaborates on
150:with the lowest central
1515:Knowledge good articles
395:
223:This article is rated
394:
148:extratropical cyclone
39:good article criteria
1063:...and a third. =)
91:Good article nominee
1245:Naming of the storm
299:WikiProject Weather
1396:Community Tech bot
396:
317:Articles Requested
229:content assessment
66:Article milestones
1367:
1343:
1220:
1203:
1155:
1086:
1042:
983:
885:
824:
815:Interesting! --♫
726:
675:
652:
574:
515:
486:
485:
421:
420:
417:
416:
413:
412:
322:Project Resources
209:
208:
100:
99:
57:
1562:
1469:RandomInfinity17
1431:
1429:
1426:
1423:
1368:
1361:
1358:
1344:
1337:
1334:
1216:
1199:
1151:
1082:
1038:
979:
881:
862:know for sure.
820:
722:
671:
648:
570:
511:
440:Copyvio detector
428:
365:
364:
363:Weather articles
361:
358:
355:
293:
288:
287:
277:
270:
269:
264:
261:
250:
243:
226:
220:
219:
218:
211:
203:January 10, 2024
199:January 10, 2018
195:January 10, 2016
191:January 10, 2013
187:January 10, 2011
170:
109:
86:
84:January 18, 2011
63:
46:
23:
16:
1570:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1505:
1504:
1453:Thurston Island
1445:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1411:
1392:nomination page
1378:
1356:
1352:
1332:
1328:
1317:
1302:Kintetsubuffalo
1298:
1247:
490:This review is
482:
454:
426:
362:
359:
356:
353:
352:
351:
327:Become a Member
289:
282:
262:
256:
227:on Knowledge's
224:
161:
160:
133:
82:
12:
11:
5:
1568:
1566:
1558:
1557:
1552:
1547:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1527:
1522:
1517:
1507:
1506:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1444:
1441:
1410:
1407:
1388:
1387:
1377:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1316:
1313:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1013:
1012:
1011:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
952:
951:
950:
931:
930:
929:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
854:
853:
852:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
793:
792:
791:
772:
771:
770:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
620:
619:
618:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
545:
544:
543:
522:Few comments.
501:
500:
484:
483:
481:
480:
475:
470:
464:
461:
460:
456:
455:
453:
452:
450:External links
447:
442:
436:
433:
432:
425:
422:
419:
418:
415:
414:
411:
410:
407:Top-importance
397:
387:
386:
379:Top-importance
375:
369:
368:
366:
350:
349:
344:
339:
334:
329:
324:
319:
313:
295:
294:
291:Weather portal
278:
266:
265:
263:Top‑importance
251:
239:
238:
232:
221:
207:
206:
181:On this day...
171:
163:
162:
156:Atlantic Ocean
134:
129:April 19, 2010
113:
112:
110:
102:
101:
98:
97:
94:
87:
79:
78:
75:
72:
68:
67:
59:
58:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1567:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1510:
1503:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1491:
1486:
1484:
1479:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1463:unconfirmed).
1461:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1454:
1450:
1442:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1430:
1416:
1408:
1406:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1375:
1371:
1365:
1360:
1359:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1341:
1336:
1335:
1326:
1322:
1315:Proposed move
1314:
1312:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1295:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1244:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1213:Hurricanehink
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1196:Hurricanehink
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1165:Cucurbitaceae
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1149:
1148:Hurricanehink
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1079:Hurricanehink
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1035:Hurricanehink
1031:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
993:
987:
982:
977:
976:Hurricanehink
973:
972:
971:
967:
963:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:
935:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
911:
903:
899:
895:
891:
890:
889:
884:
879:
878:Hurricanehink
875:
874:
873:
869:
865:
860:
859:
858:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
838:
837:
834:
828:
823:
818:
817:Hurricanehink
814:
813:
812:
808:
804:
799:
798:
797:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
777:
776:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
756:
755:
752:
744:
740:
736:
733:Dealt with.
732:
731:
730:
725:
720:
719:Hurricanehink
716:
715:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:
699:
693:
689:
685:
682:Local time.
681:
680:
679:
674:
669:
668:Hurricanehink
665:
664:
662:
656:
651:
646:
645:Hurricanehink
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
627:
626:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
604:
603:
600:
592:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
573:
568:
567:Hurricanehink
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
525:
524:
523:
520:
519:
514:
509:
508:Hurricanehink
505:
499:
497:
493:
488:
487:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
465:
463:
462:
457:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
437:
435:
434:
429:
423:
408:
405:(assessed as
404:
403:
393:
389:
388:
384:
380:
374:
371:
370:
367:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
314:
312:for details.
311:
307:
306:
301:
300:
292:
286:
281:
279:
276:
272:
271:
267:
260:
255:
252:
249:
245:
240:
236:
230:
222:
213:
212:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
182:
176:
172:
169:
165:
164:
159:
157:
153:
149:
143:
142:
141:
131:
130:
125:
123:
122:Did you know?
117:
111:
108:
104:
103:
95:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1487:
1480:
1466:
1446:
1418:
1417:
1412:
1389:
1379:
1354:
1330:
1318:
1299:
1248:
1227:Addressed.
1193:
1145:
1124:
1103:
994:
954:
938:Addressed.
933:
917:Addressed.
912:
856:
835:
795:
774:
753:
622:
601:
531:Addressed.
526:
521:
503:
502:
489:
478:Instructions
400:
378:
332:Project Talk
310:project page
303:
297:
259:Non-tropical
235:WikiProjects
178:
145:
138:
136:
127:
119:
89:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1493:Tc06cimaron
1321:Braer Storm
492:transcluded
27:Braer Storm
1509:Categories
1325:Thegreatdr
1280:Jason Rees
1266:Jason Rees
1229:Thegreatdr
1179:Thegreatdr
1131:Thegreatdr
1110:Thegreatdr
1065:Thegreatdr
1051:Thegreatdr
1020:Thegreatdr
1001:Thegreatdr
962:Thegreatdr
940:Thegreatdr
919:Thegreatdr
894:Thegreatdr
864:Thegreatdr
842:Thegreatdr
803:Thegreatdr
781:Thegreatdr
760:Thegreatdr
735:Thegreatdr
705:Thegreatdr
684:Thegreatdr
631:Thegreatdr
608:Thegreatdr
583:Thegreatdr
552:Thegreatdr
533:Thegreatdr
445:Authorship
431:GA toolbox
337:Assessment
185:column on
144:(pictured)
126:column on
37:under the
1077:Yay! --♫
504:Reviewer:
468:Templates
459:Reviewing
424:GA Review
175:Main Page
116:Main Page
1357:howcheng
1333:howcheng
473:Criteria
225:GA-class
152:pressure
51:reassess
892:Done.
840:Fixed.
779:Done.
381:on the
354:Weather
342:A-Class
305:weather
254:Weather
177:in the
146:is the
118:in the
74:Process
1296:Braer?
956:moved.
758:Done.
347:Alerts
231:scale.
201:, and
96:Listed
77:Result
1409:Winds
494:from
1497:talk
1473:talk
1400:talk
1364:chat
1340:chat
1306:talk
1284:talk
1270:talk
1255:talk
1233:talk
1218:talk
1201:talk
1183:talk
1169:talk
1153:talk
1135:talk
1114:talk
1084:talk
1069:talk
1055:talk
1040:talk
1024:talk
1005:talk
981:talk
966:talk
944:talk
923:talk
898:talk
883:talk
868:talk
846:talk
822:talk
807:talk
785:talk
764:talk
739:talk
724:talk
709:talk
688:talk
673:talk
650:talk
635:talk
612:talk
587:talk
572:talk
556:talk
537:talk
513:talk
71:Date
1451:on
1394:. —
1251:ML5
1221:)
1204:)
1156:)
1087:)
1043:)
984:)
886:)
825:)
727:)
676:)
653:)
575:)
516:)
373:Top
1511::
1499:)
1475:)
1435:🌀
1428:♫ꍏ
1425:☈⊙
1422:☾⊙
1415:🌀
1402:)
1327:.
1308:)
1286:)
1272:)
1257:)
1235:)
1185:)
1171:)
1137:)
1116:)
1071:)
1057:)
1026:)
1007:)
968:)
946:)
925:)
900:)
870:)
848:)
809:)
787:)
766:)
741:)
711:)
690:)
637:)
614:)
589:)
558:)
539:)
506:♫
409:).
257::
197:,
193:,
189:,
54:it
45:.
1495:(
1471:(
1398:(
1366:}
1362:{
1353:—
1342:}
1338:{
1329:—
1304:(
1282:(
1268:(
1253:(
1231:(
1215:(
1198:(
1181:(
1167:(
1150:(
1133:(
1112:(
1081:(
1067:(
1053:(
1037:(
1022:(
1003:(
978:(
964:(
942:(
921:(
896:(
880:(
866:(
844:(
819:(
805:(
783:(
762:(
737:(
721:(
707:(
686:(
670:(
647:(
633:(
610:(
585:(
569:(
554:(
535:(
510:(
385:.
237::
205:.
183:"
179:"
158:?
132:.
124:"
120:"
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
