42:
230:
I've never asked for this on ship-class articles, but what subsequent classes of cruiser followed this one, and what kind of improvements were made on them? It would go a great length towards establishing continuity in German ship design.
222:"Berlin survived World War II and was loaded with chemical weapons and scuttled in the Skaggerak after the war." -- You note in the lead that this was to dispose of the weapons but it isn't clarified here.
198:"he ships' guns were protected by 50 mm thick shields." -- You note these shields in the prose but none of the images seem to show a good depiction of what they are. Maybe a link is needed, or an image?
47:
80:
70:
126:
122:
52:
107:
99:
75:
214:"Hamburg was sunk by British bombers in 1944, and later broken up for scrap in 1948–1949." -- I assume she was raised first?
201:
If you look at the photo of Bremen in the US at full resolution, you can see the gun shields on the stern pair of guns.
156:
115:
17:
247:
Dup links tool indicates no issues with repeated links. Check links tool shows no problems with external links.
166:"All seven ships were good sea boats..." -- this sort of sounds like an opinion. Who is making this assertion?
206:
All of the dates in "Construction" will need to be cited, as they appear nowhere else in the article.
92:
270:
178:
It's not explained why Lübeck was outfitted with such different machinery in that section.
266:
279:
Great work, I think all of my questions have been answered then. Passing the GA now. —
150:
287:
274:
260:
160:
186:
The draft and displacement numbers in the prose differ from those in the infobox.
193:- including all seven displacements and drafts would make it far too cluttered.
170:
280:
253:
146:
252:
I am placing the article on hold pending the above improvements. —
209:
They're covered by the citation in the sentence for that section.
134:
103:
239:
Dab links tool is returning one redirect. Please fix.
173:- sort of like saying an airplane is fast in a dive or
181:It's mentioned earlier in the design section.
8:
30:
61:
33:
265:Thanks for reviewing the article, Ed.
7:
189:The infobox gives the figures for
24:
234:Added a couple of lines on this.
169:All it means is they had good
1:
288:14:28, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
275:14:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
261:13:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
161:13:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
308:
18:Talk:Bremen-class cruiser
217:Good point, added.
89:
88:
299:
285:
258:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
307:
306:
302:
301:
300:
298:
297:
296:
281:
254:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
305:
303:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
249:
248:
245:
244:
243:
237:
236:
235:
228:
227:
226:
220:
219:
218:
212:
211:
210:
204:
203:
202:
196:
195:
194:
184:
183:
182:
176:
175:
174:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
304:
289:
286:
284:
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
259:
257:
251:
250:
246:
241:
240:
238:
233:
232:
229:
224:
223:
221:
216:
215:
213:
208:
207:
205:
200:
199:
197:
192:
188:
187:
185:
180:
179:
177:
172:
168:
167:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
282:
255:
190:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
171:seakeeping
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
267:Parsecboy
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
225:Added.
191:Bremen
242:Done.
136:Watch
16:<
271:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
283:Ed!
256:Ed!
147:Ed!
273:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
269:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.