2151:
2202:", the English equivalent (a crooked story appearing to trace to William, though English king at the time of the town named in his honor's settlement, being a native Netherlander, William of Orange, yada-yada). That led to the Williamsburg on Manhattan (with a completely different etymology) and a mislabeled image of the Williamsburg Bridge, and the next thing you know I'm at the BB.
2124:
652:
2249:. I spent a fair bit of time looking for any sound reference that would address the issue, at the Coast Guard site and using Google, as temperature affects all bridges (which typically have expansion joints allowing for horizontal slippage to accommodate lateral changes). No luck. If I find anything I'll let you know. Yours,
2210:
surveyors, advised expert witnesses, drafted material for legal counsel, and given legislative testimony for permits and hearings involving it). As I indicated, that 1924 article makes a claim, provides no support for it, cites no science or scientists. We all know metal contracts when it gets cold. Yours,
2094:
Again, I'm not intending to dispute your edits. I simply wanted to ensure that the article is still good to go - that's all. But since you made 15 edits to the page in the meantime, it's hard to distinguish which of those were major or minor edits. Anyway, other than the issue of the reference, your
1955:
Please let me know what other edits I have been made were reverted then restored, as I do not have a fraction your technical skills in picking which versions to revert to or restore from; I have to do them all by hand and dint of hard work, and do not wish to put any more into it than is necessary.
599:
There's three sentences just giving a different measurement of the arches. It's hard to create a picture and relate the lengths to each other if they're not connected. And, even if it were giving other stats, the prose could be better anyway (i.e. the sentences all follow the same format, it quickly
246:
suggests that before the
Brooklyn Bridge there was already a bridge that carried trains - I'm not sure if that makes sense? I think it could be rewritten to establish that the design consideration wasn't a leftover of a previous project, but made for the bridge in order to carry the trains (still in
2209:
established by NOAA reflecting the average of all the high water heights observed over the
National Tidal Datum Epoch, itself being based on an 18.6 year lunar nodal cycle, and something I have a professional understanding of, having helped gather data for measurements based on it with professional
2171:, thanks. I didn't revert any of Wikiuser100's other edits except for the reference, just to be clear. I reverted to the last revision to restore the reference, because of the high number of edits being made during the period, but then immediately undid my own edit except for the reference removal.
887:
It sounds like Emily was important so I would probably move her first mention further up, maybe to where
Washington is first introduced? Like, add on the end of the bit about him and Tweed saying that Washington quickly became injured and so Emily took his place on-site or something like it (and
327:
Well... the side spans are first mentioned in "Suspension span". The side spans are the sections between the towers and the anchorage, and the approaches are the ramps that lead up to the anchorage. If I do this, then the section will be out of order. Also, it's pretty common for bridges to have
578:
Not sure you need to say the
Manhattan tower has more masonry, can just include the figures (I note this because the way it's currently phrased may trick a skim-reader/someone not so good with commas into thinking that the Manhattan tower has 46,945 cubic yards more masonry on top of what the
1310:
On the bit about Grover Whalen, it says the reason was said to be to reduce traffic, but the real reason was an incident caused by too much traffic... these sound like pretty much the same thing, though I expect there's nuance. Are there more details that could explain better?
2197:
You seem like good guys, I know EG is, and nobody meant any harm, so I'm not going to go back and nitpick things. I was only ever at the page by accident, inertia, starting with how
Williamsburg, Virginia got named that, with a Germanic "burg" at the end, and not
495:
I'm assuming the anchor bars referred to are the eyebars just mentioned, but by a different name? Could continue using the first specialist term so as to not confuse the reader, if this is the case. If not the same thing, then this part is harder to follow
2072:
upon, not simply reverted (or disimproved). I didn't make any edits to the
Opening section, so that should not be an issue. Let's work together to clean this up so you can get back to what you are doing and so can I. Somewhere else. :) Yours,
2120:, I think all of the issues have been replied to now. Most have been resolved, but the rest have an appropriate answer in regards to why that suggestion was not implemented. I renamed the culture and media sections, so looks all good
1821:
section could be structured better, including with some introduction/contextualizing/connectives for the different paragraphs; it's quite a disjointed list at the moment, though the paragraphs themselves are generally well-written
250:
I also think this could be bumped up - the trusses have already been given a lot of coverage, but this was the reason for them, it should come first (or as early as permitted to maintain flow, i.e. at the start of this paragraph.
1006:
Hmm, from my understanding now, it seems that the temporary ropes were not laying tracks for the future cables, but just to create a workers'/public bridge, is this right? If so, this should be made clear at the start of the
1994:
As for the deleted reference, the source indeed does say that the bridge is slightly shorter in winter, so I added the quotation saying so. Though the newspaper does not say the extent to which the bridge is smaller.
235:
Ooh, is there a close picture of the trusses that could go here? But it's still good if you don't want to put one in, the approach ramp is good coverage for this whole part and it's on the line of image overload
2193:
Well, that's where you can run rings around me, EG, as I don't know how to do that stuff. Not in any sophisticated manner. I have to go back edit by edit, revert by revert, and sift it all out. Hate
684:
The caissons were open at the bottom and closed at the top. When I hear the word "boxes", I think of something that's open at the top and closed at the bottom. Other interpretations may vary, though.
1905:
A lot of work's been done and your responses have been great - I'll leave this open if you're still working on some things, but ping me when you're satisfied and it'll probably be good to go then :)
132:
Though the panoramas at the bottom felt cumbersome on a scroll, they are useful for coverage and illustration (show entire bridge + skyline), especially for such an important subject (level 4 vital)
1314:
The first statement means to reduce traffic to remove congestion on city streets. The second statement means to remove traffic because the bridge couldn't handle the weight. I have added that now.
1122:
I don't really know the answers to any of these questions (the source doesn't really say). Back then, there was a lot of dodgy stuff going on with little explanation. I changed "fled" to "gone".
1956:
Other than all this, nice to see you. Let's work together to get what I have done sorted out, as we have on so many other articles, and I'll ditch off the page as soon as that is done. Yours,
1872:
Yes, I'm not sure what to do with this subsection, but I feel something definitely needs to be done with it. Perhaps re-title to "In culture", work on the structure, and we can see from there
2059:, saw it under Preview, hit Save, and...it's disappeared. Meanwhile, I responded to an Alert ping at the top of the page and ended up back here, with Kingsif's post alone showing. Oh, well.
146:
184:"by its nature" should generally always be surrounding by punctuation - here, a comma either side (again, though, please defer to your style guide - that goes for all these such comments)
2154:
Cool, then I support this as a GA now - I'll update the talk page template. And don't forget to put back any of
Wikiuser100's good edits that aren't in the article ! Nice work, again :)
518:
The sentence on anchor bars being a 90 degree curve can be condensed I think, it reads like it assumes I don't know what 90 degrees is. I'm sure you can come up with a solution here.
1948:
That said, every one I have made is sound. I am going to go back and delete that one citing a 1924 newspaper for the different bridge heights of MLW because I read the thing and it
2205:
As for that cite, I'm still not happy with it being back in. I happen to know a great deal about bridges, bridge clearance, and Mean High Water and how it is measured (being a
2068:
The bottom line is that I don't want to be here, or doing any of this. I want to go away, and will, as soon as I'm satisfied any legitimate edits I made have been restored, or
1494:
because the paragraph up to then is about cable cars on the bridge - more distinguishing between the existing cable cars and controversial elevated train tracks needs to happen
1333:
sounds like rehab, other options are 'reconstruction', or one of the other 're-' words already used in the paragraph (maybe renovation, to prevent repetition in this sentence)
1021:
The contract for the remaining wire was quietly awarded to the John A. Roebling's Sons company, and by
October 5, 1878, the last of the main cables' wires went over the river
162:
Yes, that would be the actual length of the bridge (as opposed to the cables or the towers). I'm trying to be as understandable while being accurate & detailed as well.
643:
In the lovely description of the caisson (I do love it), you could add that they are for humans to be in (not bridge supports, as I wrongly assumed until I read airlock).
1923:
is going through the article making changes. I want to know if (1) these changes need to be discussed, or (2) if there are any new issues that need to be fixed now.
891:
Let me think about this one. If I move Emily's first mention upward, then I will have to mention
Washington's injury twice, since she was hired after he became ill.
1773:
And if this plaque is about the site of the house, rather than the bridge, this should be mentioned (and the plaque then given only brief coverage at this article)
1455:
If the Park Row access has been closed since 9/11 (in the diagram), then the previous paragraph needs to say it was closed, and I'd expect a mention of this in the
1627:"performance atop their bridge. At the peak of their collective ascents, bright yellow smoke flares were ignited on each bridge, unifying the artists as a team,"
1941:! I had no idea this article is undergoing a GA review - and there is no way for an editor to tell. Slap a proper template on it if you don't want anyone
143:
Seems stable, little bit of IP vandalism but nothing that hasn't been instantly undone - plenty IPs working productively on it, too. No causes for concern.
1869:
the best heading for this section? The planning documents seems to lend itself to this title, but the social idiom and (global) love locks concept don't.
1634:
the event was on the cover of the New York Post, received international attention, and received ABC's
Eyewitness News 1977 Best News of the Year award
1497:
The second paragraph mentions the elevated trains, which started in 1898; this is in the same paragraph as cable cars. I have split that paragraph.
66:
1655:
There are arrests mentioned in the stunts and (obviously) crime subsections, so I see no reason to have the word in the section header only for
603:
There are two different measurements: arch and towers. I combined the arch measurements into one sentence, and clarified the tower measurement.
437:
So, it describes the kind of rock the anchorages are on, but I still can't tell if they're in the river or not - could this be outright stated?
1770:
If the Manhattan anchorage's location is so historically significant, could this not be mentioned up where the anchorage construction part is?
1376:
wikilink Atlantic Avenue at first mention; do any of the other streets in this paragraph have articles to link that aren't already done above?
1357:
The little paragraph about the Cold War needs reworking. I think you'll be good to just work on it, but if you want more thoughts, just ask :)
681:
I'm also not entirely sure why "upside-down" is included? (Though it's funny and I like it) Are boxes usually open at the bottom and not top?
62:
1991:'s opinion about whether anything significant needed to be added. But by their comment below, I don't think anything major needs to be done.
1273:
They were different. The cable cars were pulled by cables and were limited to the bridge. Trolleys could travel onto city streets as well.
1524:
The steam engines were uncoupled from the passenger carriages, and the cable cars were coupled to the passenger carriages. Or vice versa.
178:
I've removed a few commas (may edit some more, you'll see the edit reasons) - if this is against the style guide you're using, please undo
47:
944:, "wire" is used - I assume this is referring to the temporary rope, but because wire/rope aren't usually compatible it confuses a bit
254:
It is actually because the Brooklyn Bridge itself carried elevated trains (covered later on). I reworded it, and moved it to earlier.
399:
galvanized steel is used both hyphenated and not - pick one for consistency, I think both are correct so it doesn't matter which
39:
1846:
Neither the Gleizes artwork, nor any artwork representing the bridge, are mentioned; the inclusion of this image seems unusual
662:
Also, are caissons always made of southern yellow pine? If not, this needs to be separated a bit to not give that impression.
1213:
kind of sounds like the article was expecting or wanting one to find negligence, could be rephrased as simple "did not find"
736:
I guess so. What else could it be? (Seriously, I don't know, this was the wording that existed before I added the content.)
2029:
I've looked through, made a tweak or two, but most edits look good. However, I can't fully sift through all the changes to
324:
introduction mentions both approaches and the length, but I'm swung by the fact you get onto the bridge via an approach :)
1981:
1825:
The background of love locks concept is unnecessary; wikilink will do, especially since there's a good image present
1609:
Yes, because it's a proper noun, like "Jews" or "Christians". My spellcheck flags lowercase "m" Muslim as incorrect.
418:
I guess "stay" is some jargon that needs to be linked, too, probably with a brief explanation on their function here
187:
The clause about Roebling could be separated from its sentence, it makes it run on and goes into another main point.
1236:
1669:
One of the two incidents (the 2014 flag incident) wasn't art, but more of a stunt. So you were correct at first.
1659:(i.e. why not "Stunts and arrests" - because they're arrested for the stunt, like they're arrested for the art).
1492:
At the same time, there were highly controversial plans to extend the elevated railroads onto the Brooklyn Bridge
1103:
Delays, supposedly. The iron works were forced to explain themselves later on, and blamed it on another company.
1762:, I think it would be more Knowledge style to bring "At the time of construction" to the start of the sentence.
328:
approaches, since most of NYC's shoreline is located close to the sea level (as opposed to on a cliff, like the
329:
733:) or not? (If yes, the "to the editor" may have to be repeated, so maybe just say no) (Why did I even ask?)
159:
Is the length of the bridge known as 'deck'? I'm learning many things today! This is good and image useful.
619:
May need to note why the caissons needed protection (yes, they're underwater, it seems obvious, but still)
515:
Very jargon-heavy part on anchor-things that may benefit from a re-write. It doesn't seem too bad, though
2254:
2215:
2078:
1961:
760:
To what is "cumbersome" referring to in the sentence on criticism? It's a bit weasel-y for where it is.
2033:(looks like a move + add, but the history is a bit messy in this part). Tell me when you're satisfied!
83:
Probably just going to list comments in the order I find them; main editors are good and responsive :)
2224:
OK, I've gone and removed the Daily News ref, since it seems more troublesome than not to include it.
1987:
template, but didn't see it as necessary. I was confused about the changes you made, so I just wanted
1399:
needs the "Afterward" before it (if this is removed, the comma after 1958 wouldn't be needed, either)
2229:
2176:
2132:
2100:
2000:
1928:
1880:
1854:
1833:
1806:
1781:
1734:
1715:
1674:
1644:
1614:
1559:
1529:
1502:
1479:
1384:
1365:
1344:
1339:
I'm not sure what is wrong with "rehabilitation". In engineering, it's synonymous with a renovation.
1319:
1299:
1278:
1244:
1221:
1158:
1127:
1108:
1069:
1031:
987:
960:
915:
896:
849:
809:
741:
730:
710:
689:
670:
608:
564:
545:
526:
504:
484:
445:
426:
407:
388:
337:
259:
221:
198:
167:
114:
55:
17:
2017:
Hi there! The reassessment tag is prominent on the talk page, but you would've had to look there :)
1636:, but if you can think of a better way to rephrase the whole sentence I think that would improve it
1409:
A repainting of the bridge was announced two years later in advance of the bridge's 90th anniversary
304:
The next sentence could be split in two - between "...tower, where...", changing "where" to 'Here,'
1470:
In the context of NYC transit, yes, it is. An abbreviation would be "els". This is the plural for "
823:
768:
In the June 1869 sentence, maybe say "conducting these surveys", to connect to the last part more?
982:
To ensure that the rope was safe enough to hold up the temporary footbridge (mentioned later on).
1150:
Question on the word "chords" - is it supposed to say 'cords', or is it another specialist term?
181:
The three sentences about aerodynamics could be better connected, I'll leave you to work on that
1046:
is quite correct - "objected because they thought..." perhaps? Or another form you come up with
648:
Done. I appreciate it - I really am trying to get the description as understandable as possible
1693:
This also gets rid of the need for "celebrations", which currently leads to awkward repetition
721:
Is the 1867 plan image related to the video in the same box? If not, these could be separated.
2159:
2038:
1910:
1896:
1749:
1585:
1431:
1064:
Done. I think this is where the sentence would be most consistent with the context before it.
931:
831:
788:
463:
355:
277:
88:
1193:, "only one" would be better as 'only bridge' - the use of Bridge before it is a proper noun
272:
Yes, I read on and had worked that out - just a little confusing, thanks for reworking it :)
2250:
2211:
2089:
2074:
2024:
1972:
1957:
1920:
1554:
Done. The word "center" can be ambiguous, it may also refer to the "center of the roadway".
1471:
702:
Oh, on sources again a bit - there's a title with some ALLCAPS that could be less shouty :)
1666:
would be the best heading - to not suggest there's a gallery along the towers or something
871:
be tweaked a little, because high turnover has just been mentioned in a "because of" sense
2246:
2225:
2172:
2128:
2096:
2052:
2030:
2020:
1996:
1938:
1924:
1876:
1850:
1829:
1802:
1777:
1730:
1711:
1670:
1640:
1610:
1555:
1551:
I'm not sure what including "on the left sides of the roadways" adds, it could be removed
1525:
1498:
1475:
1380:
1361:
1340:
1315:
1295:
1274:
1240:
1217:
1154:
1123:
1104:
1065:
1027:
983:
956:
911:
892:
845:
805:
737:
706:
685:
666:
604:
560:
541:
522:
500:
480:
476:
Is an anchor plate a special thing with a wikilink? Or just a kind of plate that anchors?
441:
422:
403:
384:
333:
255:
244:
a design consideration from the bridge's early years when it carried heavy elevated trains
217:
194:
163:
110:
32:
1291:
are there details on the official naming in 1915 - did someone push a bill, for example?
600:
gets monotonous). Some work could be done to improve this, but it's not a major concern.
752:
Repetition of "providing" - this sentence is a bit rambling and could maybe be tweaked.
2206:
1707:(redundancy with both "celebrated" and "banquet" - a banquet is celebratory by nature)
1084:
subsection there's another "Ultimately" that should go (just "In July 1879" is better)
1521:
How did the elevated trains swap out steam engines for cable cars during their route?
1138:
Would it not be better to say which newspapers called for his removal; unless it was
907:
Were the masonry blocks lifted by pulley or timber tracks? Some combination of both?
591:
replace the infobox one? It's basically the same view, but this one looks better IMO
1726:
For the next paragraph, I'm not sure is "centennial" or 'centenary' is more correct
2168:
2155:
2150:
2117:
2056:
2034:
1988:
1906:
1892:
1745:
1581:
1427:
927:
879:
Maybe link kilo Pascals at the air pressure part? I don't think it's a common unit
827:
784:
776:
I'd combine or otherwise better connect the sentences on Roebling 2 and and Tweed.
459:
351:
273:
190:
And then connect it to the next sentence. (Sorry if these sound very instructor-y)
84:
1662:
On a related note, given the nature of the art covered in the subsection, perhaps
1541:
At one point, there were also plans for Brooklyn Bridge trains to run underground
575:
Can I just say I'm glad you haven't said the Rosendale cement was from Rosendale.
499:
Yes, but let me check this tomorrow. I agree that this contains a bit of jargon.
98:
Infobox looks a bit wide; seems to match other NYC architecture articles, though
1776:
It's more about the house, so I've trimmed it, and kept the paragraph in place.
2258:
2233:
2219:
2180:
2163:
2136:
2104:
2082:
2042:
2004:
1965:
1932:
1914:
1900:
1884:
1858:
1837:
1810:
1785:
1753:
1738:
1719:
1678:
1648:
1639:
I actually did not add that paragraph, so I have gone ahead and rephrased it.
1618:
1589:
1563:
1533:
1506:
1483:
1435:
1388:
1369:
1348:
1323:
1303:
1282:
1248:
1225:
1162:
1131:
1112:
1073:
1058:
subsection doesn't need "ultimately" (has a date), nor does it need "in fact".
1035:
1023:
is unnecessary and may be inappropriate, especially not quoted and attributed
991:
964:
935:
919:
900:
853:
835:
813:
792:
745:
714:
693:
674:
612:
568:
549:
530:
508:
488:
467:
449:
430:
411:
392:
380:
image could be set to the right? No bother if you like it on the left, though
359:
341:
281:
263:
225:
202:
171:
118:
106:
Lead perhaps a bit short for article, will add comments on its coverage below
92:
1191:
Since the New York and Brooklyn Bridge was the only one across the East River
556:
Honestly, why weren't they used in WW1? Seems like the perfect hideout, no?
521:
McCullough (1972) has an illustration of these, but it's not public domain.
1201:"50% longer" may be harder to visualize than a phrasing like '1.5 times'
540:
The air was not exposed to the outside world - it was tightly sealed.
239:
short ton could get a wikilink (I assume its in the convert template?)
1632:
I've added a "received" to correct the grammar/structure of the list
1977:
Sorry, I didn't intend that in a mean way. I would have placed the
869:
Despite the high turnover rate, only a few workers were paralyzed.
151:
I don't think bridge needs to be wikilinked. At least, I hope not.
864:
Not sure turnover needs a wikilink, but it's alright if it's kept
1419:"starting in 1982" could be bracketed by commas, but not needed
1629:
one continuous quote? If so, can it be ... cut up and restated?
1513:
The last sentence of this paragraph does not need "ultimately"
1445:
However, due to the weight restrictions, passenger vehicles...
1336:
Other instances of "rehabilitation" should also be considered
1092:
Do you know what kind of steel was being used for this part?
1729:
Depends on the dialect. In NYC "centennial" is more common.
1181:
Using both "US$ " before, and "dollars" after, is redundant
729:
Are you using "letter to the editor" as a noun phrase (i.e.
1119:
Why did Washington leave? (And "fled" may be POV language)
154:
Yes, on coverage I think there's more the lead could cover.
421:
It's really just a diagonal cable. Added Wiktionary link.
247:
the future at that point), even though it no longer does.
440:
They are inland. I'll try to add a picture or something.
292:
Repetition of "roadways" in a sentence; second instance (
1703:
Is there a better adjective to replace "celebratory" in
1447:
is inappropriate - it's continuing the point just made.
627:
Could just say "8 feet at both the bottom and the top"?
109:
Thanks for the initial comments - I expanded the lead.
74:
43:
1216:
Well, these were negligence lawsuits. I rephrased it.
1796:"If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you."
1294:
Yeah, it was an aldermanic bill. I added that detail
137:
Interesting use of the destinations table. Nice idea.
1571:
takes on a special importance in times of difficulty
1270:
Could link 'trolley' for readers outside N. America
1142:
except the two named, which should be made explicit
998:
swap the refs next to Abram Hewitt, numerical order
804:
The upright kind (as opposed to the maritime kind).
1687:I think '50 year anniversary' is more common than
1594:Don't need "Additionally" at the Devaux sentence.
1061:Re this paragraph, is this the best place for it?
559:I clarified to say this was closed to the public.
458:Nice, but be careful to not have too many images!
368:arch bridge and girder bridge could be wikilinked
1267:Were the cable car and trolley different things?
1026:Done - I meant that it was not a public affair.
294:18 feet (5.5 m) above the height of the roadways
1573:could be more simply/neutrally worded, I think
1875:I'll think about it. Thanks for the comments.
797:In the bit about sinking the caisson, what's
537:Why were the anchorage vaults always at 60F?
8:
2051:This is weird. I posted a response here to
1235:Not that I know of. Closest i could find is
822:That is giving me even more questions. Like
383:Done - seems like enough room on the right.
1171:(and in fact rarely visited the site again)
952:is there a wikilink for boatswain's chair?
1919:Thanks. I think I am almost done, but now
1255:What were the free crossings mentioned in
979:why was an engineer sent across the rope?
1232:Are there any pictures of the elephants?
320:one. A difficult view, since the short
1795:
1704:
1688:
1633:
1626:
1603:
1570:
1540:
1491:
1444:
1408:
1396:
1330:
1210:
1190:
1170:
1043:
1020:
868:
798:
705:Structure magazine? I fixed that now.
293:
243:
7:
2121:
649:
1100:Why did the contract date change?
350:That's alright then, leave as is.
24:
2149:
2122:
1952:say what it is cited to support.
1710:I simply removed "celebratory".
1602:Does muslim need a capital 'M' (
1019:I think the use of "quietly" in
971:commas around Farrington's name
650:
213:No need to repeat link to truss
1397:the towers were cleaned in 1958
232:So far, well-written, nice tone
1440:I like the new towers image :)
1407:Can replace "the bridge's" in
1:
2259:12:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
2234:02:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
2220:20:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2181:20:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2164:20:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2137:20:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2105:20:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2083:19:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2043:19:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
2005:19:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1966:19:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1933:19:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1915:05:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1901:23:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
1885:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1859:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1838:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1811:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1786:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1754:23:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
1739:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1720:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1679:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1649:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1619:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1590:23:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
1564:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1534:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1507:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1484:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1436:22:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
1389:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1370:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1349:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1324:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1304:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1283:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1249:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1226:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1163:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1132:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1113:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1074:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
1036:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
992:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
965:04:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
936:17:38, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
920:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
901:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
854:22:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
836:22:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
814:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
793:03:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
755:Reworded the entire sentence.
746:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
715:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
694:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
675:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
613:22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
569:18:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
550:18:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
531:18:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
509:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
489:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
468:16:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
450:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
431:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
412:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
393:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
360:16:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
342:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
296:) could be changed to 'them'
282:16:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
264:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
226:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
203:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
172:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
125:From just scrolling, there's
119:04:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
93:01:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
1891:on hold I think that's all!
1490:I was initially confused by
1467:Is "elevateds" a real word?
1360:Thanks, I have reworded it.
1153:I think they are synonyms.
2274:
1801:No, not that exact quote.
940:In the second sentence of
926:Good up to cable spinning
1798:mentioned in the source?
1758:In the first sentence of
1211:failed to find negligence
316:part should go above the
1849:Removed this image too.
1145:Yeah, it was the latter.
330:George Washington Bridge
2095:other edits look fine.
1943:making legitimate edits
1049:Replaced with "argued".
1604:29 Palestinian Muslims
1331:rehabilitation project
2031:the "Opening" section
1867:Cultural significance
1819:Cultural significance
1379:I think that is all.
1204:Converted to fraction
1054:last sentence of the
910:Clarified that part.
579:Brooklyn tower has!)
1543:doesn't need "also"
1173:needs the 'in fact'
955:Actually, there is.
731:letter to the editor
587:Could this image at
101:Infobox content good
18:Talk:Brooklyn Bridge
1705:celebratory banquet
1459:history subsection
1395:I don't think that
844:Yes, exactly that.
824:Pier (architecture)
635:wikilink dredging?
1982:under construction
1828:I have done that.
1184:Removed "dollars".
1082:Nearing completion
402:Done - hyphenated
147:No evident copyvio
1443:The "However" in
242:The part reading
2265:
2153:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2093:
2028:
1986:
1980:
1976:
1472:elevated railway
724:Separated these.
655:
654:
653:
479:Added wikilink.
79:
70:
51:
2273:
2272:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2123:
2087:
2018:
1984:
1978:
1970:
1794:Is the example
1689:semi-centennial
1664:Performance art
1657:Art and arrests
1259:? Pedestrians?
1095:Bessemer steel.
665:Added a comma.
651:
376:Any chance the
318:Suspension span
140:Refs consistent
60:
37:
31:
29:
27:GA Reassessment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2271:
2269:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2203:
2195:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2046:
2045:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
1992:
1953:
1946:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1870:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1756:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1630:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1592:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1441:
1438:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1059:
1056:Cable spinning
1052:
1051:
1050:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1009:cable spinning
1004:
1003:
1002:
996:
995:
994:
977:
976:
975:
969:
968:
967:
950:
949:
948:
942:Cable spinning
938:
924:
923:
922:
905:
904:
903:
885:
884:
883:
877:
876:
875:
865:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
839:
838:
817:
816:
795:
782:
781:
780:
774:
773:
772:
766:
765:
764:
758:
757:
756:
750:
749:
748:
727:
726:
725:
719:
718:
717:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
679:
678:
677:
659:
658:
657:
656:
641:
640:
639:
633:
632:
631:
625:
624:
623:
617:
616:
615:
597:
596:
595:
585:
584:
583:
576:
573:
572:
571:
554:
553:
552:
535:
534:
533:
516:
513:
512:
511:
493:
492:
491:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
453:
452:
435:
434:
433:
416:
415:
414:
397:
396:
395:
374:
373:
372:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
345:
344:
310:
309:
308:
302:
301:
300:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
267:
266:
240:
237:
233:
230:
229:
228:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
185:
179:
176:
175:
174:
156:
155:
152:
149:
144:
141:
138:
135:
134:
133:
123:
122:
121:
104:
103:
102:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2270:
2261:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2208:
2204:
2201:
2196:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2152:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2119:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2091:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2071:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2026:
2022:
2016:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1993:
1990:
1983:
1974:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1954:
1951:
1947:
1944:
1940:
1937:Whoah, here,
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1847:
1845:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1826:
1824:
1823:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1793:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1771:
1769:
1764:
1763:
1761:
1757:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1708:
1706:
1702:
1695:
1694:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1667:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1635:
1631:
1628:
1625:Question: is
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1607:
1605:
1601:
1596:
1595:
1593:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1580:
1575:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1552:
1550:
1545:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1468:
1466:
1461:
1460:
1458:
1454:
1449:
1448:
1446:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1426:
1421:
1420:
1418:
1413:
1412:
1410:
1406:
1401:
1400:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1377:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1356:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1335:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1312:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1269:
1268:
1266:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1212:
1208:
1203:
1202:
1200:
1195:
1194:
1192:
1188:
1183:
1182:
1180:
1175:
1174:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1149:
1144:
1143:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1099:
1094:
1093:
1091:
1086:
1085:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1044:objected that
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1010:
1005:
1000:
999:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
980:
978:
973:
972:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
951:
946:
945:
943:
939:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
908:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
889:
886:
881:
880:
878:
873:
872:
870:
866:
863:
855:
851:
847:
843:
842:
841:
840:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
820:
819:
818:
815:
811:
807:
803:
802:
800:
796:
794:
790:
786:
783:
778:
777:
775:
770:
769:
767:
762:
761:
759:
754:
753:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
734:
732:
728:
723:
722:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
701:
695:
691:
687:
683:
682:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
661:
660:
647:
646:
645:
644:
642:
637:
636:
634:
629:
628:
626:
621:
620:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
601:
598:
593:
592:
590:
586:
581:
580:
577:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
557:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:
517:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
475:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
454:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
379:
375:
370:
369:
367:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
326:
325:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:
303:
298:
297:
295:
291:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
249:
248:
245:
241:
238:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
214:
212:
204:
200:
196:
192:
191:
189:
188:
186:
183:
182:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
160:
158:
157:
153:
150:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
131:
130:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
105:
100:
99:
97:
96:
95:
94:
90:
86:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
2244:
2199:
2069:
2057:User:Kingsif
1949:
1942:
1866:
1818:
1759:
1663:
1656:
1457:21st century
1456:
1257:Late 19th...
1256:
1139:
1081:
1055:
1008:
941:
588:
377:
321:
317:
313:
126:
82:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
2251:Wikiuser100
2212:Wikiuser100
2207:tidal datum
2090:Wikiuser100
2075:Wikiuser100
2025:Wikiuser100
1973:Wikiuser100
1958:Wikiuser100
1921:Wikiuser100
1411:with 'its'
1011:subsection
799:brick piers
312:I feel the
44:visual edit
2226:epicgenius
2173:epicgenius
2129:epicgenius
2097:epicgenius
2021:Epicgenius
1997:epicgenius
1925:epicgenius
1877:epicgenius
1851:epicgenius
1830:epicgenius
1803:epicgenius
1778:epicgenius
1731:epicgenius
1712:epicgenius
1671:epicgenius
1641:epicgenius
1611:epicgenius
1556:epicgenius
1526:epicgenius
1499:epicgenius
1476:epicgenius
1381:epicgenius
1362:epicgenius
1341:epicgenius
1316:epicgenius
1296:epicgenius
1275:epicgenius
1241:epicgenius
1218:epicgenius
1155:epicgenius
1124:epicgenius
1105:epicgenius
1066:epicgenius
1028:epicgenius
984:epicgenius
957:epicgenius
912:epicgenius
893:epicgenius
888:accurate)
846:epicgenius
806:epicgenius
738:epicgenius
707:epicgenius
686:epicgenius
667:epicgenius
605:epicgenius
561:epicgenius
542:epicgenius
523:epicgenius
501:epicgenius
481:epicgenius
442:epicgenius
423:epicgenius
404:epicgenius
385:epicgenius
334:epicgenius
256:epicgenius
218:epicgenius
195:epicgenius
193:All done.
164:epicgenius
129:of images
111:epicgenius
2198:"Williams
1169:Not sure
216:Removed.
2245:Thanks,
2070:improved
1950:does not
1597:Removed.
1176:Removed.
1042:I'm not
314:Approach
2169:Kingsif
2156:Kingsif
2118:Kingsif
2035:Kingsif
1989:Kingsif
1907:Kingsif
1893:Kingsif
1746:Kingsif
1582:Kingsif
1428:Kingsif
1209:Saying
928:Kingsif
828:Kingsif
785:Kingsif
460:Kingsif
352:Kingsif
274:Kingsif
236:already
85:Kingsif
67:history
48:history
34:Article
1760:Impact
867:Could
763:Fixed.
589:Towers
378:Cables
1765:Done.
1696:Done.
1576:Done.
1546:Done.
1516:Done.
1462:Done.
1450:Done.
1422:Done.
1414:Done.
1402:Done.
1196:Done.
1087:Done.
1014:Done.
1001:Done.
974:Done.
947:Done.
882:Done.
874:Done.
779:Done.
771:Done.
638:Done.
630:Done.
622:Done.
594:Done.
582:Done.
371:Done.
307:Done.
299:Done.
127:a lot
76:Watch
16:<
2255:talk
2247:Epic
2230:talk
2216:talk
2200:town
2177:talk
2160:talk
2133:talk
2101:talk
2079:talk
2055:and
2053:Epic
2039:talk
2023:and
2001:talk
1962:talk
1939:Epic
1929:talk
1911:talk
1897:talk
1881:talk
1855:talk
1834:talk
1817:The
1807:talk
1782:talk
1750:talk
1735:talk
1716:talk
1675:talk
1645:talk
1615:talk
1586:talk
1560:talk
1530:talk
1503:talk
1480:talk
1432:talk
1385:talk
1366:talk
1345:talk
1320:talk
1300:talk
1279:talk
1262:Yes.
1245:talk
1237:this
1222:talk
1159:talk
1128:talk
1109:talk
1070:talk
1032:talk
988:talk
961:talk
932:talk
916:talk
897:talk
850:talk
832:talk
810:talk
789:talk
742:talk
711:talk
690:talk
671:talk
609:talk
565:talk
546:talk
527:talk
505:talk
485:talk
464:talk
446:talk
427:talk
408:talk
389:talk
356:talk
338:talk
322:Deck
278:talk
260:talk
222:talk
199:talk
168:talk
115:talk
89:talk
63:edit
40:edit
2194:it.
1865:Is
1606:)?
1474:".
1189:In
1140:all
1080:In
332:).
2257:)
2232:)
2218:)
2179:)
2162:)
2135:)
2103:)
2081:)
2041:)
2003:)
1985:}}
1979:{{
1964:)
1931:)
1913:)
1899:)
1883:)
1857:)
1836:)
1809:)
1784:)
1752:)
1737:)
1718:)
1677:)
1647:)
1617:)
1588:)
1562:)
1532:)
1505:)
1482:)
1434:)
1387:)
1368:)
1347:)
1322:)
1302:)
1281:)
1247:)
1239:.
1224:)
1161:)
1130:)
1111:)
1072:)
1034:)
990:)
963:)
934:)
918:)
899:)
852:)
834:)
826:?
812:)
801:?
791:)
744:)
713:)
692:)
673:)
611:)
567:)
548:)
529:)
507:)
487:)
466:)
448:)
429:)
410:)
391:)
358:)
340:)
280:)
262:)
224:)
201:)
170:)
117:)
91:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
2253:(
2228:(
2214:(
2175:(
2158:(
2131:(
2099:(
2092::
2088:@
2077:(
2037:(
2027::
2019:@
1999:(
1975::
1971:@
1960:(
1945:.
1927:(
1909:(
1895:(
1879:(
1853:(
1832:(
1805:(
1780:(
1748:(
1733:(
1714:(
1673:(
1643:(
1613:(
1584:(
1558:(
1528:(
1501:(
1478:(
1430:(
1383:(
1364:(
1343:(
1318:(
1298:(
1277:(
1243:(
1220:(
1157:(
1126:(
1107:(
1068:(
1030:(
986:(
959:(
930:(
914:(
895:(
848:(
830:(
808:(
787:(
740:(
709:(
688:(
669:(
607:(
563:(
544:(
525:(
503:(
483:(
462:(
444:(
425:(
406:(
387:(
354:(
336:(
276:(
258:(
220:(
197:(
166:(
113:(
87:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.