853:
leaders of the
Colonies were generally portrayed as (at best) well-meaning but naive and foolish pacifists who foolishly believe the Cylons' peace overtures and allow the colonies to be wiped out, and episodes often lectured on how politicians who sought peace were weakening their people and leaving them open to destruction by their ruthless enemies, clearly drawing deliberate parallels between the U.S. and its (Communist) super-power rivals. By contrast, Buck Rogers in the 25 Century was set after a nuclear holocaust shortly after Rogers was lost in space had all but nearly wiped out human life on Earth, which had slowly recovered and become a unified society. Although the destruction wrought by the war had prevented records from being left indicating exactly what had happened, there were implications that aggressive war-mongers, concerned by the perception that their enemies were gaining too much of an advantage, may have launched a nuclear first strike and precipitated disaster--almost the exact opposite of the views Galactica most often expressed.
722:
organisation that ran an article in a magazine or on a website where there was a way of verifying. I agree that Buster Crabbe should be kept, both because of the nod to his Flash Gordon role, and the fact that he played the original Buck Rogers. The BR/BSG merger is a fanon rumour that has been going around for some years, but I have NEVER seen a source for it, even checking the
Battlestarpegasus.com site that has a lot of trivia and in-depth info in it. It's possibly a rumour that has got so out of hand that some people believe it to be true. Ned Scott has also said that sourcing an episode seems fine as well.
901:
Wilma is heard instructing her wingmen to tow what's left of the Legion of Death back to headquarters, nothing appears on screen suggested that
Kellogg had ejected from his exploding fighter or was merely disabled. Interestingly, in a nod to Gorshin's role as Batman's Riddler, Buck later discounted Kellogg as a suspect only because he felt that "Kellog would not be bothered with riddles. It's not his style. When he decides to come after me, he will want me to know it's him, how he's going to do it, and how much it's going to hurt."
31:
703:
credible than someone writing it up for a newspaper. In fact I've seen people screw such reports up terribly. As far as some of the other items, there's no need to mention that "so and so appeared in both BSG and Buck" or that
Gorshin played the Riddler. This stuff is meaningless and is one of the reasons why people are trying to ban trivia. (It should be noted that anyone who removes trivia citing
387:. Whether episodes can be used as self sources is subject to much debate, currently; however the question about this bit is whether it is about the show or not, whether it is non-trivial enough to be in the article, and if so, how to incorporate it. You have yet to state whether you consider that it meets relevance, and where you believe it could be incorporated.
472:
episode of
Battlestar Galactica, but that's another story. :) Whether it's relevant is up for question, obviously in the time before CGI if you wanted to have futuristic buildings you were in a bind, you had to either use models or existing buildings. This isn't anything really remarkable as such, as it was common practice for the day. What do you think
708:
at the end of the day. If necessary, give it its own section, even. The episode is the source and no third-party source is necessary. If there are actually one or two readers out of the millions who visit
Knowledge who have doubts that Crabbe played Buck Rogers, they can confirm it by visiting his article.
950:
Someone has put in that the Warner Bros cartoon "Duck Dogers" is a reference to Buck Rogers. Fair enough, this I can accept, but I don't think it is a reference to this incarnation, namely the 70's television series as the first of the cartoons aired in 1953. Would it be more appropriate to shift the
900:
In "A Blast for Buck", Legion of Death leader
Kellogg (Played by Frank Gorshin) from "A Plot to Kill A City" was considered as one of the likely suspects of the cryptic limerick. However, Kellogg was shown being destroyed in the climactic space battle during part 2 of "A Plot to Kill a City". Alhough
826:
The final episode of the first season used a unique version of the opening credits. For this episode only footage from the TV version of the pilot was incorporated into the opening credits along with a special effects shot that was actually created for the first episode of the second season, "Time of
632:
I'd like to get back to tackling some of this stuff..however, where to begin. The easiest thing would be to eliminate what can't be put in. The last trivia point about the wrong type of wings would go under a production goofs section if such existed, however, it's not worthwhile making a section just
415:
I'll agree with the OR rule. What I'm saying is that something like the starport pages is referenced in the episode themselves, and it's plainly obvious that they are tributes/references to culture, call them what you like. I WILL agree that there are certain items in the trivia that are speculation,
396:
Certainly the pages talking about Star Trek, Dune, and DC could fall under the 'References to
Popular Culture' or something similiar. Also, another thing that could be mentioned is that the Earth Directorate Starfighter was in fact the original design for the BSG Viper, for reference you only have to
363:
sourced and therefore fell under the argument that you initially put, as quoted above. Now you seem to change the rules when I present a counterargument about other details. The desk story for instance is quoted in a
Starlog magazine and is therefore sourced, but somehow this seems to suddenly not be
212:
And most of those sections should be removed or trimmed massively also; that is a fallacious argument. "Everybody else does it" has never been a very powerful argument for doing anything. Further, how can one small nod to Trek improve anyone's understanding of what BR25 is about? Its trivial. It adds
670:
The fanon rumour about BSG and BR meeting has, as I mentioned to KillerChihuahua one that has been making the rounds for some years. However, I have never seen a source anywhere to verify it. I even checked battlestarpegasus.com, one of the more in-depth BSG websites that has a lot of info including
532:
No more indent just now, here's a thought. The section on the Expo buildings could go into the "Making the Movie" section. The Expo buildings seem to be well known, plus, I would say it's as relevant as the fact that
Anarchia was shot on the MGM lot. It is part of the movie making process as it's to
471:
There is an article on the Expo 67, which I imagine you could call a source. Of course, I haven't seen the other Expo buildings, but I suppose you could call it a source. If we're agreed on that, the point is now whether it's relevant. Funnily enough, some of those buildings make an appearance in an
707:
is in the wrong; the guideline (and it's a guideline, not policy) simply says Trivia should be avoided. It does not ban trivia.) The item about the BSG/Buck merger does need to be cited, I'm afraid. That one is just too wacky. The appearance by Buster Crabbe must be kept, if no other trivia remains
663:
The changed music in the final episode of the first season....now this is something I can't comment on. I haven't seen it televised for many years. I DO own the DVD's and the same title sequence is used as was used throughout the regular series run, so either this point is wrong, or the DVD release
494:
My source for what? I didn't actually put in the section on the buildings on, I did contribute a few of the trivia parts but not that. It might be more relevant to include it in the Expo 67 section. As I say, it seems to have been a common thing back then to use more futuristic buildings for sci-fi
234:
And I'll ask again about the unsourced comment. For instance the rumour of BSG and BR25 meeting has been floating around for years, but I've never actually seen a printed statement or one online from Larson saying that this would happen, so I can grant you that. However, the nods to Star Trek, Dune
979:
According to at least two places in the article the 2nd season was 11 episodes; however in the section discussing Twiki in the 2nd season, the way it's written implies that Bob Elyea did Twiki's voice for the first 10 episodes and Mel Blanc came back for the final six. 10+6=16 episodes. I ass/u/me
852:
The involvement of Glen Larson in both Galactica and Buck Rogers, the sharing of props between them, and the rumors of merging the two shows are ironic, given the different political views each show seemed to express. Battlestar Galactica expressed certain right-wing political views; the political
364:
relevant, despite your main peeve being that none of the trivia section is sourced which is blatantly untrue. Certainly sections of it like the BSG-BR25 universes meeting up are rumour without any sources. Others like the pages at the spaceport are sourced in the very episodes that are present in.
194:
Would you mind telling me how the hell you're meant to get some sources. For example, the section about the spaceport 'pages', since that's part of an episode, there's no way to put another source except the episode itself. Isn't this just removal for removal's sake, plenty other Wiki entries have
152:
Was the 'Anthony' section of the name ever used in the 70's series? I don't recall it. I know it was part of the original series though. However, there is precedence for a name change, look at the Incredible Hulk TV series where the main character was Dr David Banner rather than Bruce Banner as in
702:
I added the Erin Gray/Eric Server item. No recordings are known to exist of this because, well, it was a SF convention and you're not allowed to record these things! There is an unfair bias in Knowledge against reports from live events such as this, and I see no reason why my report is any less
721:
I wasn't ridiculing it as such, but it seems some people want all trivia removed, and looking at other articles I can see how it can get out of hand, The Prisoner is a prime example. Granted, you can't film at conventions, so you really can't source that, unless it was run by a convention
513:
I'll ask yet again, with something like this, where there is existing material (like a building in this case) how do you GET a source. Come on, give me an example here. All I can see you saying is "you have no source" over and over again, some pointers on GETTING a source would be a help.
97:
I made some changes to the organization and added some content, much of which is based on content from Gil Gerard's own web site. I've grouped all the stuff about making the movie into one section after the introduction and made the content about the series into a section that follows.
213:
nothing to the comprehension of the reader, and belongs on a fansite, not in an encyclopedia article. That said, if you find a reliable source concerning this, I will not quibble over it being included in the article, although how to explain its relevence might be a challange.
775:#32. "It was all stainless steel and had a monitor built into it. When it came time to dress his office for the series, the desk was missing. Somehow, someone walked out of Universal with a huge stainless steel desk. We just got out the plans and built another just like it."
587:
The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is verifiability, not truth. No matter how awesome or lame, important or trivial, if we can't verify it with an external, reliable source, then we should not include it. Sometimes we give things a "grace period" by using things like
878:
A 'page' in one episode was made over the New Chicago public address system, calling for "Captain Christopher Pike" -- in an apparent nod to the Captain (played by Jeffery Hunter) of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the unaired original pilot (The Cage) for the Star Trek TV
239:
be classed as unsourced. Alternately, what would you say if it had been called 'Miscellaneous', or some other title rather than Trivia. Also, the second statement about the desk does name its source, namely that of Starlog magazine and even includes an issue number.
484:
I think it belongs in the article on Expo 67 if at all, and it would be a little marginal there, but could be worked into a paragraph about the "futaristic" architecture. I have two questions: What is your source? And what do you think the relevance is?
684:
Erin meeting Eric Server. We'd need verification of that, plus voice actors often don't 'mix' with the regular casts as far as I know (I admit I could be wrong here though). After all, with voice actors, their parts can be recorded more
416:
and are therefore unsourced, whether you think they are relevant or not, perhaps it would be best to analyse each point for sources first, THEN decide whether it is relevant to the article or not, that would make things easier.
677:
Anne Lockhart and Wifred Hyde-White appearing in BR. Well its not uncommon for production companies to use actors and actresses they are already familiar with. I would also hesitate to call Wilfred a 'regular' as
561:
What's the 'reference needed' box in the main article in the 'Making the Movie' section. If it's about Juanin Clay, her wiki article cites both a fan page and IMDB as her being considered for the role of Wilma.
1041:
it is not unambiguous, since an original story is also called that, and there's a reason why Duck Dodgers parodies this title before the creation of the TV show. The primary title should redirect to
681:
The three 'pages' all from the same episode according to Ned can be cited since they are sourced to the episodes. They also contain references to popular culture, specifically sci-fi related.
815:, who played Buck Rogers in the serials, had a guest appearance as Brigadier Gordon in the episode "Planet of the Slave Girls", the character name referring to his other famous role of
178:
None of this is sourced. If sources can be found, and the content is non-trivial enough to be included in the article, please do so. Unsourced content should not be in any article (
373:
So rather then simply label it for citation required or requested, you just go and delete it without discussion or agreement from other editors. Brilliant (note the sarcasm).
671:
the lawsuits from George Lucas and a pile of other info. Nothing was mentioned there. There are sadly, not as many Buck Rogers websites that could give a source of this info.
893:
Yet another 'page' in "A Plot to Kill A City" announces that a flight is "now leaving for Planet Arrakis", an apparent nod to the planet of the same name in Frank Herbert's
965:
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
651:
The desk story has been sourced, whether its relevant is up for debate, perhaps it can go in the "Making the Movie" section. It is referenced with the Starlog article.
47:
17:
744:
The Buster Crabbe section is an episodic cite. To also make it more relevant to Buck Rogers, it should have mentioned that he was the original Buck Rogers as well.
830:
According to the pilot/movie, Buck Rogers' shuttle, Ranger 3, launched in 1987. Coincidentally, 1987 was the year when no shuttles launched, due to the shuttle
626:
So the episode cites can be put back in? In my honest opinion, some of the trivia is tenuous, and could be removed as I don't myself see how it can be sourced.
1008:
611:
552:
Okay, that's inserted. Perhaps the duplicate could be removed from the 'Trivia removed from article' section as this particular point has been dealt with.
734:
Okay, we really should get back onto this trivia section. I've noted that the Buster Crabbe reference has been noted in the episode he guest starred in.
875:, the actor who provided the voice of Dr. Theopolis, until many years after the series ended when she found herself sitting next to him on an airplane.
904:
In the first episode of the 2nd season(Time of The Hawk)Buck Rogers(a former US Air Force pilot)is shown to be wearing US Naval Flight Officer wings
310:
Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information. That something is 100% true does not mean it is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge.
397:
see Ralph McQuarrie's original artwork. I'll grant you that some of it is speculative, like the point about Dorothy Strattens voice being dubbed.
243:
657:
Gerard suffering from the flu. Well it may be true, but it didn't seem to affect the series either way. I would be for scrubbing this altogether.
674:
The points about the differing philosophies in both BSG and BR, while making a bit of interesting reading do seem to be purely personal opinion.
406:
I'm not sure how your post addresses any of the issues with this content directly. Speculation is certainly OR, I believe we agree upon that?
1064:
1046:
1024:
688:
The last part about a nod to Frank Gorshin as the Riddler is a possible Batman reference, but it DOES seem to be tenuous. I'm not sure.
919:
255:
359:
First off, the "floating round for years" comment was supporting the removal for that as I said that a comment like that means it is
295:
The obligation to provide a reliable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it
890:
character that finds himself transported from his 20th Century Earth to the Planet Rann where he has adventures similar to Rogers'.
157:
1019:
is an entirely unambiguous title. (The film info might as well be incorporated into the series article, or just as well left at
1016:
1012:
692:
So, your opinions here? I've summarised each point on what I think could be removed from the main article, sources and so on.
117:
Can anyone provide a source for the fanon rumor that BSG and Buck Rogers would have merged? It sounds vaguely hoax-ish to me.
301:
As far as the desk story, how is it even relevant? Is it germane? Please explain how it matters to anyone but a trivia buff.
930:
Been meaning to get back to this, strikeout the duplicate part about Buster Crabbe, it's mentioned in the episode listings.
1072:
1054:
1032:
989:
969:
955:
939:
923:
726:
712:
696:
642:
618:
575:
566:
556:
547:
537:
518:
508:
499:
489:
476:
436:
420:
410:
401:
391:
377:
368:
339:
318:
259:
217:
199:
186:
167:
141:
131:
121:
106:
83:
79:. I mention this so that I don't take complete credit for its content, as I was unable to move the history along with it.
289:
Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor
543:
That strikes me as relatively relevant, if you'll pardon the alliteration. Care to insert it in the correct paragraph?
38:
598:, but any editor wishing to remove the unsourced info may do so at any time. This is all stated in the policy
330:
A source more reliable and verifiable than the episode containing the trivia? (If we're talking about that) --
1028:
749:
Several stock shots protraying futuristic buildings on Earth are that of remaining pavillions on the site of
451:
Several stock shots protraying futuristic buildings on Earth are that of remaining pavillions on the site of
1068:
1050:
985:
599:
935:
915:
638:
251:
138:
981:
795:
660:
Dorothy Stratten being overdubbed. I've never heard anything to corroborate that, it seems unimportant.
654:
The Stunt double point. I don't see any real way of citing this, especially as Vendrell was uncredited.
779:
235:
and DC are in episodes, IE they do exist and you can hear them from watching the episodes, so how can
907:
572:
544:
505:
486:
433:
407:
388:
335:
315:
214:
183:
966:
783:
592:
102:
The trivia section needs to be at the end of the discussion on the TV series, so I moved it down.
771:
952:
931:
911:
723:
693:
634:
563:
553:
534:
515:
496:
473:
417:
398:
365:
247:
196:
154:
128:
786:
in the world and has been a stunt man for 30 years. He has taught and trained such people as
163:
I need to check my DVD but I believe he is identified by his full name in the first episode.
1001:
868:
800:
704:
845:
been renewed for a second season, it would have eventually found Earth - the Earth of the
838:
787:
762:
464:
331:
348:
Well excuse me for being rude, but do you even read your own initial post, as quoted here
182:
and trivia is called trivia because it is, well, trivial. In other words, not important.
754:
615:
456:
812:
709:
302:
164:
118:
103:
80:
667:
The point about the shuttle launches. It's easily checked but is it really relevant?
385:...and the content is non-trivial enough to be included in the article, please do so
883:
816:
374:
571:
There are no references in the entire "Making the movie" section in this article.
281:
Articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources
1042:
1020:
872:
791:
769:"I designed a desk for Dr. Huer," said Art Director Paul Peters in the magazine
495:
films, look at the Conquest of the Planet of the Apes film for a prime example.
273:
179:
76:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
831:
887:
823:
The voice of Dorothy Stratten in "Cruise Ship to the Stars" was overdubbed.
137:
There's a fanvid circulating around Youtube visualizing this proposal. (
750:
452:
807:
While filming "Flight of the War Witch", Gerard suffered from the flu.
758:
460:
75:
The contents of this article were originally part of the article
894:
867:
During a presentation at a 1997 science fiction convention in
25:
272:"Floating around for years" hardly qualifies as sourced. See
127:
I don't know about a source, but I've heard the same rumour.
882:
Another 'page' in "A Plot To Kill A City" called for "Dr.
834:
accident in January, 1986. The next launch was in 1988.
432:(reduce indent) I quite agree. Pick one, your call. :)
778:
Gerard's uncredited stunt double on Buck Rogers was
504:So you don't have a source? Then it doesn't go in.
856:Anne Lockhart and Wilfred Hyde-White are the only
355:"None of this is sourced. If sources can be found"
980:that 11 is the correct number, but I don't know.
798:. He is now stunt co-ordinator on the TV series
18:Talk:Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (TV series)
610:we should remove the trivia is the guideline
8:
1009:Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (TV series)
951:reference to the main Buck Rogers article?
612:Knowledge:Avoid trivia sections in articles
849:TV series - and the two shows would merge.
782:. Michael is the last remaining master of
1015:—No need for the parenthetical tag since
1063:Fair enough, move request suspended. --
383:I am not changing a thing, I also said
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
975:Twiki info vs. duration of 2nd season
7:
841:rumor states that, had the original
761:national pavillion (now open as the
463:national pavillion (now open as the
1004:|Buck Rogers in the 25th Century}}
444:Okay, lets start with this one....
24:
606:cite an episode as a source. The
29:
1017:Buck Rogers in the 25th Century
1013:Buck Rogers in the 25th Century
871:, Gray said that she never met
924:15:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
168:16:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
158:15:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
84:21:43, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
970:06:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
727:19:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
713:17:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
697:18:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
619:17:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
576:23:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
567:22:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
557:17:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
548:22:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
538:21:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
519:19:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
509:00:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
500:00:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
490:21:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
477:21:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
437:23:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
421:22:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
411:17:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
402:16:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
392:01:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
378:01:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
369:01:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
319:22:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
260:21:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
218:18:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
200:18:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
187:13:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
132:20:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
940:19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
647:From the top of whats left.
107:05:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
738:Trivia removed from article
533:do with location shooting.
1091:
1073:14:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
1055:11:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
1033:13:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
990:02:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
956:13:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
643:14:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
142:21:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
122:01:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
946:Duck Dodgers as reference
113:Fanon rumor re: Galactica
961:WikiProject class rating
340:13:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
602:. That being said, you
600:Knowledge:Verifiability
860:regulars to appear on
796:Arnold Schwarzenegger
246:comment was added by
42:of past discussions.
858:Battlestar Galactica
843:Battlestar Galactica
147:
90:Re-org and additions
305:, a policy states:
195:similiar sections.
926:
910:comment added by
262:
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1082:
1005:
905:
869:Calgary, Alberta
780:Michael Vendrell
753:, including the
597:
591:
455:, including the
284:
241:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1080:
1079:
999:
997:
977:
963:
948:
942:- end trivia -
788:David Carradine
763:Montreal Casino
740:
595:
589:
573:KillerChihuahua
545:KillerChihuahua
506:KillerChihuahua
487:KillerChihuahua
465:Montreal Casino
434:KillerChihuahua
408:KillerChihuahua
389:KillerChihuahua
316:KillerChihuahua
279:
242:—The preceding
215:KillerChihuahua
184:KillerChihuahua
176:
150:
115:
92:
72:
70:Article history
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1088:
1086:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1058:
1057:
996:
995:Requested move
993:
976:
973:
967:BetacommandBot
962:
959:
947:
944:
928:
927:
902:
898:
891:
880:
876:
865:
854:
850:
835:
828:
824:
821:
808:
805:
776:
767:
746:
739:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
716:
715:
690:
689:
686:
682:
679:
675:
672:
668:
665:
661:
658:
655:
652:
630:
629:
628:
627:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
448:
447:
446:
445:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
313:
312:
299:
298:
292:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
205:
204:
203:
202:
175:
172:
171:
170:
149:
146:
139:205.250.167.76
135:
134:
114:
111:
110:
109:
91:
88:
87:
86:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1087:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:87.79.164.189
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:70.29.208.247
1044:
1040:
1039:Strong oppose
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:78.34.108.150
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1003:
994:
992:
991:
987:
983:
982:Fitfatfighter
974:
972:
971:
968:
960:
958:
957:
954:
945:
943:
941:
937:
933:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
903:
899:
896:
892:
889:
885:
881:
877:
874:
870:
866:
863:
859:
855:
851:
848:
844:
840:
837:A persistent
836:
833:
829:
825:
822:
820:
818:
814:
813:Buster Crabbe
809:
806:
803:
802:
797:
793:
789:
785:
784:Yee Chuan Tao
781:
777:
774:
773:
768:
766:
764:
760:
756:
752:
747:
745:
742:
741:
737:
735:
728:
725:
720:
719:
718:
717:
714:
711:
706:
701:
700:
699:
698:
695:
687:
685:conveniently.
683:
680:
676:
673:
669:
666:
662:
659:
656:
653:
650:
649:
648:
645:
644:
640:
636:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
594:
577:
574:
570:
569:
568:
565:
560:
559:
558:
555:
551:
550:
549:
546:
542:
541:
540:
539:
536:
520:
517:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
502:
501:
498:
493:
492:
491:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
475:
469:
468:
466:
462:
458:
454:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
435:
422:
419:
414:
413:
412:
409:
405:
404:
403:
400:
395:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
371:
370:
367:
362:
357:
356:
347:
341:
337:
333:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
311:
308:
307:
306:
304:
296:
293:
290:
287:
286:
285:
282:
277:
275:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
219:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
201:
198:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
185:
181:
173:
169:
166:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
145:
143:
140:
133:
130:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
112:
108:
105:
101:
100:
99:
95:
89:
85:
82:
78:
74:
73:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1038:
1007:
998:
978:
964:
953:Douglasnicol
949:
932:Douglasnicol
929:
912:Douglasnicol
884:Adam Strange
861:
857:
846:
842:
817:Flash Gordon
810:
799:
770:
748:
743:
733:
724:Douglasnicol
694:Douglasnicol
691:
664:was altered.
646:
635:Douglasnicol
631:
607:
603:
586:
564:Douglasnicol
554:Douglasnicol
535:Douglasnicol
531:
516:Douglasnicol
497:Douglasnicol
474:Douglasnicol
470:
450:
449:
431:
418:Douglasnicol
399:Douglasnicol
384:
372:
366:Douglasnicol
360:
358:
354:
353:
314:
309:
300:
294:
288:
280:
278:
271:
248:Douglasnicol
236:
197:Douglasnicol
177:
155:Douglasnicol
153:the comics.
151:
136:
129:Douglasnicol
116:
96:
93:
60:
43:
37:
1043:Buck Rogers
1021:Buck Rogers
906:—Preceding
873:Eric Server
862:Buck Rogers
847:Buck Rogers
792:Brandon Lee
608:real reason
148:Buck's name
77:Buck Rogers
36:This is an
832:Challenger
827:the Hawk".
633:for that.
593:citeneeded
332:Ittakezou0
888:DC comics
705:WP:TRIVIA
616:Ned Scott
61:Archive 1
920:contribs
908:unsigned
710:23skidoo
256:contribs
244:unsigned
165:23skidoo
119:23skidoo
104:23skidoo
81:23skidoo
1002:movereq
897:novels.
886:", the
879:series.
772:Starlog
755:British
751:Expo 67
457:British
453:Expo 67
375:Alyeska
39:archive
811:Actor
759:French
461:French
303:WP:NOT
174:Trivia
1023:.) --
839:fanon
678:such.
614:. --
16:<
1069:talk
1051:talk
1029:talk
986:talk
936:talk
916:talk
895:Dune
801:Lost
794:and
757:and
639:talk
459:and
336:talk
274:WP:V
252:talk
237:that
180:WP:V
94:Hi:
604:can
361:NOT
1071:)
1053:)
1045:.
1031:)
1011:→
1000:{{
988:)
938:)
922:)
918:•
790:,
765:).
641:)
596:}}
590:{{
467:).
338:)
297:."
276::
258:)
254:•
144:)
1067:(
1049:(
1027:(
984:(
934:(
914:(
864:.
819:.
804:.
637:(
334:(
291:.
283:.
250:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.