Talk:Government of China

1822:

the source I included which emphasizes the cooperation between various parties in the decision making process. Another user also had mentioned months ago about how the political parties should have more emphasis. This suggestion reflects the attached source, published by Redfame Publishing, which emphasizes "multi-party cooperation and political consultation led by the CPC and further developing the function of the party participating in the management of state affairs... The CPC maintains wide political cooperation with the democratic parties and unites with them in the march forward." Please let me know if you still have any objections after this clarification.

552:, and most of the stuff in this article about the party and military should be gotten rid of. Either way, this article needs to be merged with one of the two. What then that new article should be called is another matter. It may be true that Government of China is a better name than Central People's Government, although I think Central People's Government specifically marks out one of the three branches of authority in China, whereas Government of China is more broad, and is similar to Politics of China. If we are going to maintain the page Government, then the content should be distinguished from, and more than a cut and paste of, Politics of China. - 2047:

functions. Also, to make sure that the reader does not get the idea that there is only 1 political party functioning in China, this information is extremely relevant to include. I agree that specific details don't need to be included, and this is a very broad topic that is expanded on later in our article. The lesser important stuff is mentioned in the main body of the article. There are 2 editors other than me right now who have expressed the need for the minor political parties to have more emphasis which suggests a change should happen. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Thank you!

95: 2097:"Since the new period, by constantly strengthening the self-development and working persistently towards a new economic landscape, the CPWDP takes an active part in the activities of the CPPCC at various levels. With incomplete estimation, more than60,000 issues having been submitted, the CPWDP central and local organizations have made important contributions to the development of our economy, culture, society, and especially to the medical and health work." 1973:

because it no longer gives the impression that only 1 party exists and operates in China. Can you please explain what you mean when you say my language isn't neutral? I am trying my best to improve our article in a way that reflects important information accurately. Also, can you please explain why the sources I provided is not a reliable source? And as you correctly pointed out in your first reply, the 9 parties are listed in the body of the paragraph. I also agree with @

85: 64: 384: 190: 169: 200: 295: 274: 305: 33: 2103:

parties. Like JArthur1984 said, the current lead gives the impression that only 1 party operates in China. A call for change regarding the 9 parties has been suggested 3 times now by various editors which signifies to me that a change is needed. Consensus building requires input from all not just these 3 editors, and I look forward to your response.

1230:. A government is always tied to a political entity, which in this case is the "PRC". There are 2 competing governments, both of which claim to govern "China - which is a region including the present PRC and ROC territory). As an encyclopaedia, it is also our duty to make sure that people understand the difference, hence my argument for 2094:"Since reform and opening-up, performing its functions of democratic supervision, and actively engaging in the programme of intellectual poverty alleviation and non-public economy development, the CDNCA has made great contributions to the economic development, political stability and social progress." 2088:

developments of these parties. If this source is unreliable, can you please explain why? I have looked closely at this source and I cannot find anything alarming about its reliability. Here are a few quotes from the source I originally provided which give more details of the importance of these parties:

2152:

Thank you for the reply. By including info about how China has a 1-party system, and by not including how there are actually 9 parties, it does imply that these parties do not exist. One of the reasons for this suggestion is to avoid confusion. Why do you think it should not be added? Shouldn't we be

2102:

There are details about each specific party, but I only listed 3 because I'm sure you get the idea. By mentioning the minor parties that exist, it improves the balance of our article by presenting information more accurately and by acknowledging the government structure surrounding the many political

1937:

SCMP is fine for this purpose. It's a generally reliable source and nothing in this article is a contentious subject. While there was a "rough consensus that additional considerations may apply" in CPC related coverage, there's no reason to apply additional considerations here. I don't even know what

620:

There are lots of statistics here, but it's unclear how the hierarchy of local governments is structured, exactly. What is the difference between a prefecture, county, city, municipality, urban district, township, and village? What does it mean to be (for example) a county-level city? Also, it would

1991:

Overall, I think there are a great many ways to make this point that could be valid. It's clear to me that minor parties need to be referenced in the lead. I'm fine with your proposed language. I don't know that publisher you referred to in an earlier comment or the quality of that source, but there

547:

page - word for word. If the article is not going to refer specifically to the Government, as opposed to the party and the military, then it should be merged with politics of China (have a look at that page - it is exactly the same). If, on the other hand, it is to refer to the Government, as in one

492:

is not recognizable in English as the government of China. If it is in use in China to refer to the government of China, that might be mentioned in the article. Politics is the process of influencing or controlling a government, not government itself. I think we are having some problems in semantics

2190:

The lead as it stands now is not good enough. We need to work together and be willing to give-and-take collectively. The lead is not good.. For instance, how does the CPC control state appointments? Through the NPC and the people's congresses, but this article completely fails what institutions the

2046:

I agree that the lead should give emphasis to important topics, and I believe that including more emphasis to the 9 political parties is very important information to include in the lead. By having this sentence, the reader will have a better understanding of the core of how the government of China

1836:

It's good to reflect the minor parties in the lead. I am in favor of doing so. I don't think readers will be confused about their subordinate role. Indeed the second paragraph begins, "The government in China is under the sole control of the CCP, with the CCP constitution outlining the party as the

1821:

Thanks for the reply. You're right that the body of the article does mention the role of the minor political parties. My suggestion is for including a sentence about it in the lead of our article as well. I believe this piece of information is extremely important to include, especially considering

2311:

which suffers from a redundancy problem as Marxist Leninism forms the ideological core of any communist party. It would be akin to saying the capitalist Capitalist Party of Norway - not necessary to describe the party in that way when capitalism forms the ideological core of any capitalist party.

1972:

Thanks for your reply. My suggestion is to have the sentence read: "The Government of the People's Republic of China is a unitary Marxist–Leninist authoritarian political system with 9 political parties led primarily by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)." It improves the neutrality of the article

1720:

I had originally wanted to change it to this: "The Government of the People's Republic of China follows a unitary Marxist–Leninist framework with a dominant authoritarian governance style. Within this framework, China's political landscape features the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as the pivotal

601:) and I saw no reference whatever to the president or courts. Also, it seems important to note that there are no specific references to how the government works in any of the constitution. This leaves the whole government in the hands of the Communist Party and in the hands of whoever is in power. 704:

The first sentence reads "All power within the government of the People's Republic of China is divided among three bodies: the People's Republic of China, State Council, and the People's Liberation Army (PLA)." The second "People's Republic of China" seems to be in error, as it makes no sense.

458:

OK, this page really sucks. It doesn't tell you anything about how government in the PRC actually works. I'd like to see some description of the tiao/kuai relationship and the descent of authority from the Center to provinces to cities, townships, villages. etc. Also some explanation of the

2087:

These minor parties are not mentioned at all in our article's lead which gives the impression that they do not exist. This suggestion improves the article while also acknowledging the CCP being the dominant political party in the country. The source provided gives some information about the

2285:

I rewrote it to "The government of the People's Republic of China is based on a system of people's congress, in which the Marxist–Leninist Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is designated as "the highest force for political leadership" and enacts its policies through people's congresses." A

1763:. Nowhere in this source does it say that party authorities retain tight control over candidate pools and selection processes, nor does it warn that candidates' popular support should not be the determining factor in ultimate selection decisions which is why I suggest it be removed. 1840:

Given the sentence I quote here and the emphasis on One Party in the lead sentence, it's important to reference the minor parties in the lead. Without that, as currently worded, we risk readers developing the incorrect impression that there's only one party operating in China.

479:. We should be expanding that article. The relations between party state and army belongs under politics, not under a entity "Government of the People's Republic of China " (more properly the "Central People's Government") which belongs solely under the state. -- 992:

I recommend moving this page's contents to "Government of the People's Republic of China," which currently redirects to this page, in order to maintain neutrality with respect to the PROC's and ROC's rival claims to legitimacy as the government of China per se.

2239:

I stated above that in my view there were a number of different ways to address the minor parties in the lead that could be acceptable. The version you have added to the lead is the clearest language so far. I recommend we keep the language you have added.

1755:

Interestingly, the source follows up by saying "Party authorities, however, retain tight control over candidate pools and selection processes, and warn that candidates' popular support should not be the determining factor in ultimate selection decisions."

2302:

I kept much of what you wrote, but I would like to point out two changes which I made. First, I disagree with you when you say Marxist-Leninist state is a vague term. It has its separate article which opens up with a precise and specific definition:

1738:

2. The current lead does not mention anything about the other political parties that exist. This hurts the balance of our article. This is why I suggest mentioning the 9 political parties as well as emphasis on the dominant role the CCP plays.

679: 640:

It would be informative to give some sense of how much independence (if any) the various organs of government have from the Communist Party (or other centers of power), in practice. How much of a role does corruption play in government? --

459:

problems inherent in the Chinese system including the lack of a stable, formal mechanism for the transfer of power and the informal basis of politics, ie. a leader's power depends more on who supports him and less on his actual position. --

1498:- that's called being neutral. Furthermore, if your concern is that the lede is too short, please go ahead and propose changes. It's inappropriate to show up on an article, and without so much as a single edit, just tag the heck out of it. 516:

I disagree with the merge. This article (government of the People's Republic of China) is a topical article discussing the government aspect of the politics of the PRC. The politics and government articles can be better organised, e.g.

2345:

Officially yes this is correct but we cannot just go by what is "officially said" when there are independent sources which say something different. Here are sources which describe the country as a Marxist/Marxist Leninist state.

1782:

I thought it would be a good idea to notify you of this proposal because you had suggested to put it to the talk page. Please let me know (and all other editors are invited to share their thoughts too) what you think! Thank you!

525:

of France. It currently covers the legal system, the communist party, the PLA, etc. The Central People's Government in modern times is largely synonymous with the State Council, but the term has in the past different meanings. —

2328:

I agree with you're points about "Marxist-Leninist party", its redundant.. Socialist state / communist state is more fitting, however, the problem is that China is officially a socialist state and not a communist state...

1727:

Here is my new suggestion: "The Government of the People's Republic of China is a unitary Marxist–Leninist authoritarian political system with 9 political parties led primarily by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

1734:

1. Another user, 5+ months ago had suggested more emphasis to the 8 minor parties. Over 1 month ago, I had shown my agreement to the request but did not edit the article to wait for other editors to contribute.

720:

Clearly so. I have clarified the lead. The article does not at this time serve its intended purpose as a description of the administrative structure of the Chinese government. Close to zero actual information.

680:

http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=zh-CN&newwindow=1&safe=strict&q=%E4%B8%AD%E5%A4%AE%E5%8A%9E%E5%85%AC%E5%8E%85&btnG=Google+%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

1745:

4. One of the sources, Minzner, Carl. "Countries at the Crossroads 2011: China", does not reflect the information in the article so I suggest it be removed (and replaced with the source listed above).

581:

According to verious sources, "' the Central People's Government' is synonymous with the State Council", therefore the merger is proposed between the wrong articles. I will change the tags accordingly.

1180:

as yet another China-related move request. The main difference between the China situation and the Ireland/Macedonia situations is that "China" commonly refers to a country, not a geographic area.

1541:

Being neutral isn't a single point of view. It's neutrality. There's no need to put in people's POVs ABOUT the government in an article describing the FORM of the government. Or would you like

1749:

The current version reads: "The Government of the People's Republic of China is a unitary Marxist–Leninist one-party authoritarian political system under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)."

1717:

The current article reads: "The Government of the People's Republic of China is a unitary Marxist–Leninist one-party authoritarian political system under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)."

1797:

Undue to have the eight minor political parties in the lead. The role of the minor political parties is addressed in the body of article. They have little to no meaningful power. Also, the

2447: 1473:

The article makes no mention of potential problems/controversies/etc with the government, and seems stripped of anything positive or negative about it, being purely informational.

1609: 1123: 597:

This article says (or implies) that the constitution of the People's Republic of China defines the president's power. I read through an english translation of it (linked to in

1673: 1443: 2221: 1235: 2269:

I re included the part about Marxist Leninism. I do not think there should be any argument over this as even Atinoua uses the term as part of the original suggestion.

2224:. Yes, its not independent of the CPC, but its transmission belt, which, when it functions, allows the Party leadership to acquire knowledge about other viewpoints. -- 598: 1742:

3. The question of whether China has a one-party system is not agreed upon unanimously. To reflect a more nuanced view of reality, I have included a source for it.

2442: 1374: 1370: 1356: 1049: 141: 783: 504:

I agree with the above. Government of the PRC is clear, Central People's Government would only be found via a redirect which Knowledge prefers to minimize.

2153:

cautious about this? I also need to clarify that the source I provided is not from the People's Daily, it is from RedFame Publishing. What are your thoughts?

2477: 1902: 472: 351: 2091:"the RCCK actively engaged in land reform movement, Resist-America-Aid-Korea Campaign , the movement against the “three evils” and the “five evils”." 361: 1752:

However, the source for this statement reads: " eight minor political parties as channels for providing government and party leaders with suggestions"

1714:

Hello! I had a suggestion to improve our article which is why I will suggest the changes on the talk page for discussion and work towards a consensus.

2462: 657: 256: 246: 2351:. Once more, I would like to remind you that the original suggestion used the term Marxist Leninst so this is something we should not be removing. 2482: 2437: 2467: 151: 439: 1628: 1084: 951: 864: 803: 686: 327: 1760: 1025:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

752:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

2472: 2452: 1516: 868: 860: 831: 222: 1724:

However, another editor commented about how the language is essay-like. That wasn't my intention and I agree that it can be improved.

2457: 400: 1696: 1352:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1923:

for CCP-specific issues. Second, the piece does not really lend itself to stressing overall importance of the eight minor parties.

1234:. (Note that in the case of disputed territories such as Palestine for example, articles have always used the precise name such as 1977:

that including this will help to prevent readers from believing that only 1 party exists in China. Looking forward to your reply.

771: 117: 1613: 1542: 318: 279: 213: 174: 1938:

those additional considerations might be. This is just nuts-and-bolts material about how China's government is structured.

1695:

Doesn’t make sense. “that” after the first comma should be replaced by “but”. And “is usually holding” by “usually holds”.

1666: 1436: 1905:

available online which is nice as it can be easily referenced for anyone interested in the Talk page topic. Good summary.

2073:

that lend greater weight to the importance of the eight minor parties in government, the topic remains undue for a lead.

2006:

I agree. If anyone has other suggestions for a better way to include the minor parties in the lead, please suggest them!

548:

of the three parts of the politics of China, the other 2 being the party and the military, then it should be merged with

1681: 1451: 1417: 606: 549: 489: 476: 44: 1083:– Per Antediluvian67's request, the PRC Government only controls the Mainland while the ROC controls the Taiwan area. 795: 108: 69: 17: 1804: 116:

related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1298: 1016: 915: 743: 1373:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

412: 2356: 2317: 2274: 1127: 1088: 998: 443: 1632: 955: 690: 1662:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2029: 1887:. Also, keep in mind that something cannot be in the lead if it's not first covered adequately in the body. 1677: 1571: 1532: 1484: 1447: 1408: 1334: 1182: 1148: 872: 835: 602: 1272: 1247: 1239: 1227: 1210: 2245: 1997: 1943: 1910: 1846: 1700: 1392:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1380: 1342: 1308: 1169: 1026: 1002: 978: 753: 725: 566: 530: 50: 1580:

So you have reliable sources claiming that how China says its government is structured is false?!?!?!?

1333:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 694: 1104:

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with

562:

Contemporarily speaking, the law courts and the National People's Congress are not part of the CPG. —

1260: 1202: 1161: 1140: 1061: 1043: 948: 911: 768: 705:

Based on the rest of the paragraph, it appears that "Communist Party of China" is what is intended.

522: 435: 2305:

a one-party state that is administered and governed by a communist party guided by Marxism–Leninism.

2120:, nothing is implying that eight minor parties do not exist. The lead is about summarizing the most 1952:

Still doesn't support the notion that those minor parties are of such importance to be in the lead.

621:

be informative to have more information about which local governments are elected vs. appointed. --

32: 2352: 2313: 2270: 1585: 1554: 1503: 1326: 1074: 994: 849: 799: 787: 493:

with literal translations of Chinese terminology not meaning in English what they mean in Chinese.

432:

So far the only government site given is the english one. I would appreciate the chinese version.

706: 326:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

221:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2334: 2291: 2229: 2196: 1567: 1528: 1480: 1144: 856: 845: 518: 475:(indeed, it seems all of it was copied from there). The entity we should be interested in is the 418: 2349: 1377:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2347: 1859:

of minor political parties in the Chinese government. As such, it would be undue for the lead.

1393: 2413: 2259: 2158: 2108: 2052: 2011: 1982: 1827: 1788: 1768: 1647: 1477:

And there are almost definitely more issues, but i'm not a skilled enough editor to spot them.

1268: 1243: 1231: 1223: 1206: 1039: 710: 544: 460: 84: 63: 2405: 2241: 2143: 2078: 2037: 1993: 1974: 1957: 1939: 1928: 1906: 1892: 1864: 1842: 1812: 891: 816: 722: 646: 626: 583: 563: 527: 494: 414: 383: 310: 1400: 2130: 1799: 1054: 765: 553: 205: 1469:. (It has recently be removed, and I disagree, there are still too few inline citations.) 2220:

I've added a sentence about the other parties. We should also add a paragraph about the

1432:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

2135: 2021: 1920: 1880: 1581: 1563: 1550: 1546: 1520: 1512: 1499: 1359:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1399:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

199: 189: 168: 2431: 2330: 2287: 2225: 2192: 2025: 1658:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

936: 505: 2255: 2211: 2154: 2125: 2117: 2104: 2070: 2066: 2048: 2007: 1978: 1884: 1876: 1823: 1784: 1764: 1643: 968: 100: 1992:

are already sources in the article that address the minor parties and their role.

2215: 2139: 2074: 2033: 1953: 1924: 1888: 1860: 1808: 1779: 1366: 1267:

article having a hatnote at the top for ROC is precedent enough to follow here.

882: 807: 668: 642: 622: 416: 2393: 2361: 2339: 2322: 2296: 2279: 2263: 2249: 2234: 2201: 2162: 2147: 2112: 2082: 2056: 2041: 2015: 2001: 1986: 1961: 1947: 1932: 1914: 1896: 1868: 1850: 1831: 1816: 1792: 1772: 1704: 1685: 1651: 1636: 1617: 1589: 1575: 1558: 1536: 1507: 1488: 1455: 1422: 1365:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1307:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

1276: 1251: 1214: 1193: 1188: 1172: 1152: 1092: 1068: 977:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

959: 940: 919: 896: 876: 839: 821: 776: 728: 714: 650: 630: 610: 586: 570: 556: 534: 508: 497: 483: 480: 447: 300: 195: 90: 2416: 2409: 1475:

There are a good few too many sections, which could definitely be condensed.

1471:

There is effectively no lead, as the article immediately begins with a list.

323: 2061:

The issue is not the existence of eight minor political, but their overall

1721:

central leadership entity among the nine political parties in the nation."

1465:

First off, there's the "too few inline citations" that's been there since

932: 830:"Government of China" is a redirect, why would you move the redirect? -- 218: 304: 294: 273: 2286:

Marxist-Leninist state or Marxist-Leninist system is a very vague term

1343:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090504140432/http://govinfo.nlc.gov.cn/

1759:

The primary source provided from this secondary source can be found

1264: 1165: 928: 791: 113: 1428:

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

988:

Recommend move to "Government of the People's Republic of China"

658:

List of Chinese (People's Republic of China) government entities

543:

The problem is that this page is almost exactly the same as the

2134:

source that you previously cited, you probably should consider

1627:

Please edit article to show the 8 political parties of China.

419: 377: 26: 2024:, "the emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly 1346: 1242:. I have yet to see a "Government of Palestine" articles. -- 2128:. If you are interested in more reliable sourcing than the 2065:

in the Chinese government. You still have not produced any

2254:

I am OK with these changes. A good compromise. Thank you.

1494:

Being purely informational is precisely what this article

1337:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1879:

that explains their importance? What you provided is not

2020:

Items of lesser importance do not belong in a lead. Per

1731:

This change benefits our article for multiple reasons.

742:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

1855:

Nor would one want to create a false impression of the

1330: 1079: 1259:

Sympathetic to Lemongirl's arguments, but I think the

655: 471:

This page contains too much text that was copied from

18:

Talk:Government of the People's Republic of China

2398:

International Journal of English and Cultural Studies

1297:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

967:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

322:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 217:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1369:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1126:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 1029:. No further edits should be made to this section. 798:is a redirect to it. I would also move the current 756:. No further edits should be made to this section. 2309:The Marxist–Leninist Chinese Communist Party (CCP) 2222:Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference 1311:. No further edits should be made to this section. 981:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1919:First, probably need something more neutral than 1236:Palestinian Authority government in the West Bank 2448:C-Class China-related articles of Top-importance 1672:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1442:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1355:This message was posted before February 2018. 599:Constitution of the People's Republic of China 669:http://www.gov.cn/gwy2010/content_1439539.htm 8: 1080:Government of the People's Republic of China 784:Government of the People's Republic of China 1604:characteristics of unitary system in China 1566:, I am talking about POVs about the FORM. 1325:I have just modified one external link on 1124:polling is not a substitute for discussion 1015:The following is a closed discussion of a 473:politics of the People's Republic of China 268: 163: 58: 1901:Yes, we have in the body. One is an SCMP 1837:"highest force for political leadership". 2069:that make that case. Until you can cite 2384: 987: 270: 165: 60: 30: 1038:. While I understand the concerns for 2443:Top-importance China-related articles 1545:to contain an in-depth discussion of 7: 2124:points of the body, as backed up by 1226:. This is Knowledge's worst case of 1128:Knowledge's policy on article titles 1034:The result of the move request was: 865:Government of China (disambiguation) 804:Government of China (disambiguation) 761:The result of the move request was: 316:This article is within the scope of 211:This article is within the scope of 106:This article is within the scope of 2394:"Eight Democratic Parties in China" 2026:reflect its importance to the topic 1517:Knowledge:Describing_points_of_view 1201:Main article is (correctly) China. 861:Chinese government (disambiguation) 49:It is of interest to the following 2478:High-importance socialism articles 1143:and hasn't there been discussion? 663:Confusion about the department of 25: 1329:. Please take a moment to review 428:Chinese language government site? 2463:Mid-importance politics articles 2307:What is vague is when you wrote 656:Another reason for the topic of 382: 303: 293: 272: 198: 188: 167: 93: 83: 62: 31: 1610:2405:204:10AC:6BB5:0:0:3E8:B8A1 1543:Government of the United States 1527:significant POVs on a subject. 852:. 12:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 616:Provincial and local government 356:This article has been rated as 336:Knowledge:WikiProject Socialism 251:This article has been rated as 146:This article has been rated as 2483:WikiProject Socialism articles 2438:C-Class China-related articles 1710:Edit Suggestion 26 August 2023 1263:argument, as well as the main 1008:Requested move 6 February 2017 844:To be clear, I would redirect 339:Template:WikiProject Socialism 231:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 2468:WikiProject Politics articles 2362:19:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 2340:14:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 2323:08:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 2297:05:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 2280:04:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 2264:22:31, 1 September 2023 (UTC) 2250:14:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC) 2235:08:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC) 1277:01:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC) 1116:, then sign your comment with 1069:03:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC) 960:23:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 941:18:15, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 863:and the existing redirect at 777:13:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 587:09:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 498:14:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC) 330:and see a list of open tasks. 234:Template:WikiProject Politics 225:and see a list of open tasks. 120:and see a list of open tasks. 2392:Xiaoyi, Huang (2021-03-11). 1686:14:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC) 1618:14:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC) 1590:18:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC) 1576:17:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC) 1559:17:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC) 1537:17:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC) 1508:17:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC) 1489:16:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC) 1423:19:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC) 1252:15:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 1215:04:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC) 1194:16:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 1173:12:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 1153:08:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 1093:01:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 1003:18:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC) 927:to match the parent article 920:08:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 897:03:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 877:13:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 840:05:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 822:20:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 715:14:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC) 611:19:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 448:08:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC) 2202:10:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 2163:21:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 2148:20:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 2113:05:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 2083:03:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 2057:02:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 2042:01:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC) 2030:reliable, published sources 2016:21:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 2002:18:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1987:18:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1962:18:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1948:18:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1933:17:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1915:14:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1897:14:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1869:19:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1851:12:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1832:03:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1817:00:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 1793:23:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC) 1773:20:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC) 790:– For the same reason that 550:Central People's Government 490:Central People's Government 484:18:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 477:Central People's Government 126:Knowledge:WikiProject China 2499: 2473:C-Class socialism articles 2453:WikiProject China articles 1705:16:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC) 1637:18:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 1386:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1347:http://govinfo.nlc.gov.cn/ 1322:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 796:People's Republic of China 362:project's importance scale 257:project's importance scale 152:project's importance scale 129:Template:WikiProject China 2458:C-Class politics articles 1652:23:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC) 1568:MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) 1529:MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) 1481:MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) 1456:03:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC) 1164:and per the main article 867:gets repointed there? -- 695:04:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC) 355: 288: 250: 183: 145: 78: 57: 2410:10.11114/ijecs.v4i1.5187 1304:Please do not modify it. 1289:Any additional comments: 1022:Please do not modify it. 974:Please do not modify it. 749:Please do not modify it. 729:19:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 636:Practical considerations 571:07:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC) 557:00:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 535:21:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 454:More Substantial Content 2191:CPC governs through. -- 1667:Mao Zedong portrait.jpg 1437:Mao Zedong portrait.jpg 1318:External links modified 651:16:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 631:16:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 509:03:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 1883:language and is not a 1875:Do you have a neutral 1240:Palestinian government 1205:applies here as well. 132:China-related articles 39:This article is rated 1519:. A single POV isn't 319:WikiProject Socialism 1367:regular verification 1046:are prevalent here. 214:WikiProject Politics 1642:I agree with this. 1623:8 political parties 1357:After February 2018 1327:Government of China 1075:Government of China 850:Government of China 800:Government of China 788:Government of China 463:, 14 February 2006 1678:Community Tech bot 1448:Community Tech bot 1411:InternetArchiveBot 1362:InternetArchiveBot 857:Chinese government 846:Chinese government 603:Rhinocerous Ranger 342:socialism articles 45:content assessment 1807:in this context. 1691:Grammar in Note 1 1387: 1053: 1050:non-admin closure 794:is at China, and 774: 545:Politics of China 450: 438:comment added by 425: 424: 406: 405: 376: 375: 372: 371: 368: 367: 267: 266: 263: 262: 237:politics articles 162: 161: 158: 157: 109:WikiProject China 16:(Redirected from 2490: 2421: 2420: 2389: 2219: 1461:Multiple issues. 1421: 1412: 1385: 1384: 1363: 1306: 1191: 1185: 1170:Timrollpickering 1120: 1114: 1108: 1082: 1066: 1059: 1047: 1042:, arguments for 1024: 976: 889: 814: 772: 751: 723:User:Fred Bauder 700:Outright errors? 433: 420: 397: 396: 386: 378: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334: 313: 311:Socialism portal 308: 307: 297: 290: 289: 284: 276: 269: 239: 238: 235: 232: 229: 208: 203: 202: 192: 185: 184: 179: 171: 164: 134: 133: 130: 127: 124: 103: 98: 97: 96: 87: 80: 79: 74: 66: 59: 42: 36: 35: 27: 21: 2498: 2497: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2209: 2028:, according to 1805:reliable source 1712: 1693: 1674:nomination page 1660: 1625: 1606: 1463: 1444:nomination page 1430: 1415: 1410: 1378: 1371:have permission 1361: 1335:this simple FaQ 1320: 1315: 1302: 1285: 1228:WP:SYSTEMICBIAS 1189: 1183: 1118: 1112: 1106: 1100: 1078: 1062: 1055: 1020: 1010: 990: 985: 972: 912:Marcus Qwertyus 910:- Consistency. 883: 808: 747: 737: 702: 661: 638: 618: 595: 469: 456: 440:124.179.245.115 430: 421: 415: 391: 358:High-importance 341: 338: 335: 332: 331: 309: 302: 283:High‑importance 282: 236: 233: 230: 227: 226: 206:Politics portal 204: 197: 177: 131: 128: 125: 122: 121: 99: 94: 92: 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2496: 2494: 2486: 2485: 2480: 2475: 2470: 2465: 2460: 2455: 2450: 2445: 2440: 2430: 2429: 2423: 2422: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2353:Politixsperson 2314:Politixsperson 2271:Politixsperson 2252: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2131:People's Daily 2100: 2099: 2098: 2095: 2092: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1838: 1800:People's Daily 1711: 1708: 1692: 1689: 1670: 1669: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1629:24.163.114.243 1624: 1621: 1605: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1547:Neoimperialism 1478: 1476: 1474: 1472: 1470: 1462: 1459: 1440: 1439: 1429: 1426: 1405: 1404: 1397: 1350: 1349: 1341:Added archive 1319: 1316: 1314: 1313: 1299:requested move 1293: 1292: 1291: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1254: 1217: 1196: 1175: 1155: 1133: 1132: 1107:*'''Support''' 1099: 1096: 1085:135.23.144.238 1072: 1032: 1031: 1017:requested move 1011: 1009: 1006: 995:Antediluvian67 989: 986: 984: 983: 969:requested move 963: 962: 952:204.140.157.75 943: 922: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 881:Yes, exactly. 859:gets moved to 781: 780: 759: 758: 744:requested move 738: 736: 735:Requested move 733: 732: 731: 701: 698: 687:124.78.208.113 683: 682: 672: 671: 660: 654: 637: 634: 617: 614: 594: 591: 590: 589: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 538: 537: 512: 511: 501: 500: 468: 465: 455: 452: 429: 426: 423: 422: 417: 413: 411: 408: 407: 404: 403: 393: 392: 387: 381: 374: 373: 370: 369: 366: 365: 354: 348: 347: 345: 328:the discussion 315: 314: 298: 286: 285: 277: 265: 264: 261: 260: 253:Mid-importance 249: 243: 242: 240: 223:the discussion 210: 209: 193: 181: 180: 178:Mid‑importance 172: 160: 159: 156: 155: 148:Top-importance 144: 138: 137: 135: 118:the discussion 105: 104: 88: 76: 75: 73:Top‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 37: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2495: 2484: 2481: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2461: 2459: 2456: 2454: 2451: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2433: 2418: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2388: 2385: 2381: 2363: 2360: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2348: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2338: 2336: 2332: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2321: 2319: 2315: 2310: 2306: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2293: 2289: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2217: 2213: 2207: 2203: 2200: 2198: 2194: 2188: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2132: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1971: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1839: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1781: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1757: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1715: 1709: 1707: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1622: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1603: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1468: 1460: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1427: 1425: 1424: 1419: 1414: 1413: 1402: 1398: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1382: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1317: 1312: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1261:WP:COMMONNAME 1258: 1255: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1203:WP:COMMONNAME 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1179: 1178:Strong oppose 1176: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1162:WP:COMMONNAME 1159: 1158:Strong oppose 1156: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145:In ictu oculi 1142: 1141:WP:COMMONNAME 1138: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1125: 1117: 1113:*'''Oppose''' 1111: 1105: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1081: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1060: 1058: 1051: 1045: 1044:WP:COMMONNAME 1041: 1037: 1030: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1005: 1004: 1000: 996: 982: 980: 975: 970: 965: 964: 961: 957: 953: 950: 949:WP:COMMONNAME 947: 944: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 923: 921: 917: 913: 909: 906: 898: 895: 894: 890: 888: 887: 880: 879: 878: 874: 870: 869:65.92.180.137 866: 862: 858: 854: 853: 851: 847: 843: 842: 841: 837: 833: 832:65.92.180.137 829: 826: 825: 824: 823: 820: 819: 815: 813: 812: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 779: 778: 775: 769: 767: 764: 757: 755: 750: 745: 740: 739: 734: 730: 727: 724: 719: 718: 717: 716: 712: 708: 699: 697: 696: 692: 688: 681: 677: 676: 675: 670: 666: 665: 664: 659: 653: 652: 648: 644: 635: 633: 632: 628: 624: 615: 613: 612: 608: 604: 600: 592: 588: 585: 580: 579: 572: 569: 568: 565: 560: 559: 558: 555: 551: 546: 542: 541: 540: 539: 536: 533: 532: 529: 524: 520: 514: 513: 510: 507: 503: 502: 499: 496: 491: 488: 487: 486: 485: 482: 478: 474: 466: 464: 462: 453: 451: 449: 445: 441: 437: 427: 410: 409: 402: 399: 398: 395: 394: 390: 385: 380: 379: 363: 359: 353: 350: 349: 346: 329: 325: 321: 320: 312: 306: 301: 299: 296: 292: 291: 287: 281: 278: 275: 271: 258: 254: 248: 245: 244: 241: 224: 220: 216: 215: 207: 201: 196: 194: 191: 187: 186: 182: 176: 173: 170: 166: 153: 149: 143: 140: 139: 136: 119: 115: 111: 110: 102: 91: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 34: 29: 28: 19: 2401: 2397: 2387: 2379: 2344: 2327: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2284: 2268: 2208: 2189: 2129: 2121: 2062: 1856: 1798: 1758: 1754: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1716: 1713: 1694: 1671: 1661: 1626: 1607: 1524: 1495: 1466: 1464: 1441: 1431: 1409: 1406: 1381:source check 1360: 1354: 1351: 1324: 1321: 1303: 1296: 1288: 1269:TonyBallioni 1256: 1244:Lemongirl942 1219: 1207:AusLondonder 1198: 1181: 1177: 1157: 1136: 1121: 1115: 1109: 1103: 1073: 1063: 1056: 1035: 1033: 1021: 1014: 991: 973: 966: 945: 924: 907: 892: 885: 884: 827: 817: 810: 809: 782: 762: 760: 748: 741: 703: 684: 673: 662: 639: 619: 596: 593:Constitution 561: 515: 470: 461:Kingshiadric 457: 431: 388: 357: 317: 252: 212: 147: 107: 101:China portal 51:WikiProjects 2242:JArthur1984 1994:JArthur1984 1975:JArthur1984 1940:JArthur1984 1907:JArthur1984 1843:JArthur1984 1697:82.36.70.45 1309:move review 1027:move review 979:move review 754:move review 584:Ohconfucius 495:Fred Bauder 434:—Preceding 2432:Categories 2380:References 2063:importance 1857:importance 1523:. NPOV is 1418:Report bug 1283:Discussion 1232:WP:PRECISE 1224:WP:PRECISE 1040:WP:PRECISE 766:Cúchullain 678:中共中央办公厅 - 554:Matthew238 523:government 2417:2575-8101 2404:(1): 39. 2122:important 1803:is not a 1582:Simonm223 1564:Simonm223 1551:Simonm223 1513:Simonm223 1500:Simonm223 1496:should be 1401:this tool 1394:this tool 1036:not moved 401:Archive 1 333:Socialism 324:socialism 280:Socialism 2331:TheUzbek 2288:TheUzbek 2226:TheUzbek 2193:TheUzbek 1407:Cheers.— 1122:. Since 802:page to 667:中央办公厅 - 519:politics 506:SnowFire 436:unsigned 389:Archives 228:Politics 219:politics 175:Politics 2256:Atinoua 2212:Atinoua 2155:Atinoua 2136:WP:GREL 2118:Atinoua 2105:Atinoua 2049:Atinoua 2022:WP:LEAD 2008:Atinoua 1979:Atinoua 1921:WP:SCMP 1903:article 1881:WP:NPOV 1824:Atinoua 1785:Atinoua 1765:Atinoua 1644:Atinoua 1521:WP:NPOV 1331:my edit 1220:Support 1190:(talk) 1064:Warrior 946:Support 925:Support 908:Support 828:Comment 707:DWorley 360:on the 255:on the 150:on the 41:C-class 2216:Amigao 2140:Amigao 2075:Amigao 2034:Amigao 1954:Amigao 1925:Amigao 1889:Amigao 1861:Amigao 1809:Amigao 1780:Amigao 1608:Voice 1257:Oppose 1222:- per 1199:Oppose 1137:Oppose 1098:Survey 886:bd2412 855:So... 811:bd2412 643:Beland 623:Beland 567:ntnood 531:ntnood 467:Merge? 47:scale. 2126:WP:RS 2071:WP:RS 2067:WP:RS 1885:WP:RS 1877:WP:RS 1265:China 1166:China 929:China 792:China 763:Move. 564:Insta 528:Insta 481:Jiang 123:China 114:China 70:China 2414:ISSN 2357:talk 2335:talk 2318:talk 2292:talk 2275:talk 2260:talk 2246:talk 2230:talk 2214:and 2197:talk 2159:talk 2144:talk 2109:talk 2079:talk 2053:talk 2038:talk 2012:talk 1998:talk 1983:talk 1958:talk 1944:talk 1929:talk 1911:talk 1893:talk 1865:talk 1847:talk 1828:talk 1813:talk 1789:talk 1769:talk 1761:here 1701:talk 1682:talk 1648:talk 1633:talk 1614:talk 1586:talk 1572:talk 1555:talk 1533:talk 1504:talk 1485:talk 1467:2008 1452:talk 1273:talk 1248:talk 1238:and 1211:talk 1184:ONR 1160:per 1149:talk 1139:per 1119:~~~~ 1089:talk 999:talk 956:talk 937:talk 931:. -- 916:talk 873:talk 836:talk 726:Talk 711:talk 691:talk 674:and 647:talk 627:talk 607:talk 521:and 444:talk 352:High 2406:doi 2032:." 1676:. — 1525:all 1375:RfC 1345:to 1301:. 1057:Sky 971:. 933:BDD 848:to 247:Mid 142:Top 2434:: 2412:. 2400:. 2396:. 2262:) 2248:) 2161:) 2146:) 2138:. 2111:) 2081:) 2055:) 2040:) 2014:) 2000:) 1985:) 1960:) 1946:) 1931:) 1913:) 1895:) 1867:) 1849:) 1830:) 1815:) 1791:) 1771:) 1703:) 1684:) 1650:) 1635:) 1616:) 1588:) 1574:) 1557:) 1549:? 1535:) 1515:, 1506:) 1487:) 1479:-- 1454:) 1446:. 1388:. 1383:}} 1379:{{ 1275:) 1250:) 1213:) 1168:. 1151:) 1110:or 1091:) 1077:→ 1019:. 1001:) 958:) 939:) 918:) 875:) 838:) 806:. 786:→ 746:. 713:) 693:) 685:-- 649:) 629:) 609:) 446:) 2419:. 2408:: 2402:4 2359:) 2355:( 2337:) 2333:( 2320:) 2316:( 2294:) 2290:( 2277:) 2273:( 2258:( 2244:( 2232:) 2228:( 2218:: 2210:@ 2199:) 2195:( 2157:( 2142:( 2107:( 2077:( 2051:( 2036:( 2010:( 1996:( 1981:( 1956:( 1942:( 1927:( 1909:( 1891:( 1863:( 1845:( 1826:( 1811:( 1787:( 1778:@ 1767:( 1699:( 1680:( 1646:( 1631:( 1612:( 1584:( 1570:( 1553:( 1531:( 1502:( 1483:( 1450:( 1420:) 1416:( 1403:. 1396:. 1271:( 1246:( 1209:( 1147:( 1130:. 1087:( 1052:) 1048:( 997:( 954:( 935:( 914:( 893:T 871:( 834:( 818:T 773:c 770:/ 709:( 689:( 645:( 625:( 605:( 442:( 364:. 259:. 154:. 53:: 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index