1166:
would have described it?), 'which cost him the victory and the life of his ally' (lovely zeugma, but strange focalising: gives the agency to the person who didn't do the dying), 'the disastrous Battle of Actium' (not for
Octavian). There are a few other spots which give the sense of detail being missed out: 'a constitutional advantage' (what, exactly, is that?) and 'advocating birth control'. In general, it looks as though the article's had a good spot-fix, and could now do with a more general look-over so that the ideas are expressed as someone would express them in 2022, not 1922. I've got a personal bugbear against 'committed suicide' (see
359:
217:
21:
919:
778:
696:
673:
1773:
1763:
1750:
1737:
1724:
1714:
1696:
1682:
1668:
1654:
1641:
1628:
1029:
996:
943:
897:
875:
838:
816:
756:
76:
135:
107:
343:
425:
404:
1056:
1791:
804:
reluctance. I would like to see the references straightened out a little - tighter links between the sources and the ideas they contain, and, in general, multiple citations reduced to one when supporting a single non-controversial fact. Where there are multiple views on something, it would be better to separate out in the text or a footnote precisely what each source believes.
1392:
material from multiple sources, often where few see our subject as their main topic. Syme was the great master of this approach - have a look at his footnotes and see how he pieced together the raw material for his narrative. Both of the sources I linked for you contain useful information, on topics pertinent to the article, which is not currently reflected in the article.
375:
197:
281:
249:
543:
1162:). Even if you cite a modern source which bases its argument on older ones, you have the advantage of their fact-checking - that is, it proves that the older narrative is indeed up to date, and has not been superseded or questioned. If you only read and cite the older source, you run the risk of missing an important modern critique.
145:
1454:
I don't think I can explain this any further: I find your tone in the last response aggressive, and don't have confidence that we can have a reasonable or productive discussion about this. I have explained the steps I am happy to take with the review: I will leave it at that, for you or other editors
1395:
On the older sources: Syme certainly has a lot of value, but definitely isn't the standard text on the 'Revolution' any more, and hasn't been since at least the 1970s. If you've got JSTOR access, these reviews will give you a sense of how his work is currently used and (rightly) viewed more through a
1099:
both rely on Syme 1939), so that, while "there has certainly been a lot of more recent research on the Second
Triumvirate", this is not true of Sosius in particular, on whom older literature remains up to date. That said, I have reduced somewhat the number of citations to those sources from the 1920s
1071:
This article is nearly there - I would like to place it on hold for a week to give the editors a chance to address certain matters. In particular, the overall tone and language needs to be brought closer into line with modern encyclopaedic
English, and aspects of the citation need to be cleared up so
1578:
That's fine, the lead expansion is a rather weak suggestion anyway since the page is so short. I think that it would help the page but I agree it is out of scope, such is GAR. I've reviewed the page again, cleaned up a few more bits of prose. Page meets GA criteria and passes. Congrats on your first
1165:
The tone is much better: there are still a few parts which read a little 'off' (more like an essay, or perhaps an early-20th-century historian) - look out particularly for bits which editorialise in favour of the Romans/one side: 'subdued the rebellious island city of Aradus' (is that how the locals
1144:
This is just an example - 26 is another (presumably, Shipley doesn't give evidence for Syme's views, and so the citation to him should be pushed back before the brackets); 13 sticks out as well (again, a lot of moving parts: a) Sosius rebuilt the temple, b) Sosius pilfered the statues, c) Sosius was
1140:
Syme and
Broughton provide evidence for all of that? I'd suggest that it's more likely that some parts come from Syme, others from Broughton, and that the overall synthesis may be original to Knowledge. If the two sources do indeed have precisely identical accounts, then only one should be cited; if
1048:
There is a single image, understandable given the nature of the evidence - it would be good to expand the caption here, perhaps with a footnote, to explain why the identification with Sosius is possible/dubious. It would be nice to have an image of the Temple of Apollo
Sosianus, if one exists, but I
731:
The layout is professional and the lead section does a good job of summarising the material. There is still some work to do on 'words to watch', or loaded language and editorialising more generally (see for instance 'warmly espoused the cause of Antony', 'a violent harangue before the senate', 'this
1184:
I made some further changes as suggested. Still, I don't see a problem with some sentences citing more than one source, nor am I convinced that any reader at all will think that some of these passages are "from 1922", whatever that means. As for the works you cited above, they aren't focused on the
1435:
So you haven't a clue what the sources say, and are drawing conclusions on how they should be cited? WP:TSI says nothing about pedantically assigning each individual citation to each fragment of a sentence, nor about readers being able to personally verify what is in them, and and bundling sources
803:
There are a few places where the line between the editorial voice and the citation is not clear: note 29, for example, cites Fluss, which supports the intercession of
Arruntius but is at best indirect evidence for Octavian's reluctance to pardon Sosius, and offers no opinion on the reason for this
1391:
In terms of the sources cited: there's nothing wrong with picking up valuable information passing mentions. You aren't going to find a whole book on a relatively peripheral figure like Sosius: what we do when we work with these kind of characters (and even the major ones) is pick up small bits of
1534:
I ran this through Earwig and made random spotchecks, I am not finding anything in the realm of copyvios and everything seems reasonably cited. I did a fair amount of copy editing, just to save on time, please double check my work. These issues are relatively minor so this aught to be done in no
1420:
As the article stands, I'm not happy to pass it under c1 or c2. I recognise, however, that some of these are subjective matters, particularly when it comes to assessing what level of prose or citation is 'good enough' for GA status, versus the expectations of an FA. I'm happy, therefore, to wait
688:
Mostly there. I've gone in and added some non-breaking spaces before BC/AD. The prose sometimes becomes clunky and archaic, and occasionally steers away from an encyclopaedic towards loaded vocabulary and moral judgement - I think this may be a reflection of slightly over-close use of some older
1128:
I'm not sure the problems are quite fixed, particularly as regards citations. To take a quick example: note 14 covers 'The Second
Triumvirate was to legally expire in 32 BC against the backdrop of Antony's growing enmity with Octavian and his marriage with Cleopatra, the queen of Egypt.', and
807:
I am a little concerned that the article relies heavily on older research - the most cited sources are 1927, 1930 and 1939, there is only one 21st-century source, and the newer sources such as the CAH are referred to relatively lightly. I appreciate that doing Roman prosopography often means
1124:
Thank you - I can certainly see the progress. I think the coin picture is good for the article and the identification is good enough for a 'maybe' - though also note that the CNG page mentions a few with his actual name on them. I wonder if any pictures of those
366:
263:
808:
contending with changing scholarly appetites, but there has certainly been a lot of more recent research on the Second
Triumvirate, for instance, and it would be good to cite the key matters of historical fact to up-to-date sources where possible.
1153:
is simply a restatement of .g. Syme - see for instance
Barbara Kellum's recent-ish (2008, p. 279) look at the Temple of Apollo Sosianus through a gender lens, which you can get the salient parts of from the Google Books preview
1148:
I fully appreciate your point on the lack of modern scholarship on Sosius specifically - though there is a significant chunk that comes up when you put his name into JSTOR in "quotes". It's also not quite the case that
1363:
Assuming that all of those assertions are indeed backed up in the sources, splitting the citation so that the individual facts are cited would prove the case and remove the ambiguity. The other way to do it is through
1129:
references it both to
Broughton and to Syme. There's a couple of key facts here - a) the Triumvirate was due to expire in 32, b) Antony was increasingly an enemy of Octavian, c) Antony's marriage to Cleopatra was (by
1876:
231:
382:
267:
1901:
1896:
1159:
1871:
1072:
that it is clear exactly what material is being sourced from exactly what authority. It would also be beneficial if the references could be more heavily weighted towards more recent scholarship.
1291:
The current citation style (citing Syme and Broughton for the whole thing) makes it impossible to tell which are actually supported by Syme and which are supported by Broughton. This is part of
1921:
475:
465:
801:
The citation style, particularly the frequent use of multiple citations for individual points, sometimes makes it difficult to ascertain precisely what is proven by precisely which source.
798:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
1861:
1926:
226:
121:
1103:
Now that you mention it, I had never verified the authenticity of the coin picture. I found no sources aside from the CNG website itself, so I might replace or remove it altogether.
795:
831:
Facts are reliably cited to secondary literature, and the handling of the primary-source evidence from Josephus is done well to avoid the charge of OR. See caveats in 2a above.
1916:
1881:
441:
293:
682:
1160:
https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_War_That_Made_the_Roman_Empire/4qJgEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Gaius+Sosius%22&pg=PA162&printsec=frontcover
962:
This is difficult to judge: it was massively cut down on 25 December, having been broadly stable beforehand. There is, however, no evidence of edit warring thus far.
1866:
1856:
721:
581:
437:
432:
409:
1911:
1158:). Ditto if you do the same with Google Books - there's some good material on him in Barry Strauss' 2022 book, which goes into more detail on his role at Actium (
857:
I cannot straightforwardly check all the sources, but the overwhelming impression is that this represents the judicious synthesis of multiple sources throughout.
1088:
I have attempted to address the objectionable language (the article was indeed originally copied from an old public domain source) and the excessive citations.
436:, a group of contributors interested in Knowledge's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
548:
1906:
1295:. I don't have the sources in front of me, so this is only an example, but it's possible that the real picture of what the sources actually say is closer to:
571:
1891:
1013:
620:
1440:. Do elaborate more on C1 and C2, because all the concerns on your box for C1 have been addressed, and there are absolutely no verifiability concerns.
1421:
until the end of the hold period to see where the article is at that point, and to pass it on for second opinion if the concerns above still stand.
725:
717:
350:
259:
206:
117:
1886:
163:
1155:
709:
288:
254:
1348:
1329:
1257:
1245:
297:
1851:
167:
1377:, which had ruled Rome for the last decade, was about to legally expire and relations between the triumvirs Antony and Octavian collapsed.
1304:, which had ruled Rome for the last decade, was about to legally expire and relations between the triumvirs Antony and Octavian collapsed.
1220:, which had ruled Rome for the last decade, was about to legally expire and relations between the triumvirs Antony and Octavian collapsed.
1207:
The issue with citation isn't about multiple citations in one sentence - it's about the loss of precision when multiple ideas are cited
46:
1211:
to multiple sources, without any clear sense of which, if any, are supported by each source. A good example is the following sentence:
1042:
553:
171:
162:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1841:
713:
1170:), but there are a couple of other examples where the language sticks out as dated ('routed under cover of fog a squadron...').
1618:
929:
650:
576:
158:
112:
38:
32:
1846:
1460:
1426:
1175:
847:
825:
635:
614:
1091:
The problem with using newer sources is that they are brief and refer to older works for the full picture (for example, the
1193:
are classics, used as basic works of reference to this day, and there is no reason not to regard them as reliable sources.
527:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1829:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1005:
87:
1017:
787:
1456:
1422:
1171:
1081:
791:
705:
631:
610:
1387:
For Sosius' consulship, Broughton, p.147; for the breakdown of the Triumvirate in 32 BC, see Syme, pp.276-277.
1499:
clarify. Did he rebuild it himself? I assume he oversaw it. The sentence as a whole is a bit awkward to read.
1156:
https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Sex_and_Difference_in_Ancient_Greece_and/waUxEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
1009:
906:
741:
292:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1049:
can see the argument that many more pictures would be an aesthetic rather than an educational improvement.
956:
884:
595:
20:
1560:
recommends no more than two paragraphs for < 15,000 characters, and this article has just over 6000.
599:
93:
53:
1437:
851:
1185:
topic and thus cover it only briefly; the ones from JSTOR are also mostly passing mentions. Syme's
1167:
1130:
1815:
1589:
1545:
1374:
1365:
1301:
1217:
1038:
510:
1603:
890:
A good overview and biography, especially given the obvious limitations of the source material.
1565:
1491:
1445:
1198:
1113:
764:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
42:
982:
978:
150:
1396:
history-of-scholarship lens than as a first resort for matters of fact and interpretation:
986:
933:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
1785:
1731:
1557:
1436:"that each support a different portion of the preceding text" is explicitly allowed by
765:
358:
216:
1835:
1807:
1757:
1635:
1608:
1581:
1537:
1292:
502:
1744:
1690:
1676:
1662:
1575:
1561:
1529:
1441:
1194:
1109:
1404:
1399:
1368:, where the footnote actually explains what each source says: so something like:
1790:
342:
134:
106:
1141:
not, and the difference is significant, it should be reflected in the article.
140:
1648:
1413:
905:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
602:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
424:
403:
955:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
374:
936:
There are a few minor points that need addressing here (see 1 above)
771:
The formal aspects of citation are excellent. See 2b below, however.
1820:
1594:
1569:
1550:
1464:
1449:
1430:
1410:, which is very important in the current conversation on the period)
1280:
In 32 BC, the Second Triumvirate had ruled Rome for the last decade.
1202:
1179:
1117:
639:
624:
515:
280:
248:
170:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
196:
1784:
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
1133:) somehow connected to at least b) and somehow relevant to a).
69:
15:
1283:
In 32 BC, the Second Triumvirate was about to legally expire.
373:
357:
341:
215:
195:
1877:
Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
440:. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
1300:
Gaius Sosius assumed the consulship in 32 BC, just as the
1286:
In 32 BC, relations between Antony and Octavian collapsed.
1373:
Gaius Sosius assumed the consulship in 32 BC just as the
1216:
Gaius Sosius assumed the consulship in 32 BC just as the
1902:
Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
59:
1897:
GA-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
1872:
GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
1556:
Done mostly. I disagree about the lead, however, as
912:This is nicely done: clear and concise throughout.
324:
1922:Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
683:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
1862:Unknown-importance biography (military) articles
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1927:All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
1489:one of his most loyal and important lieutenants
1371:
1298:
1214:
450:Knowledge:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
367:Roman and Byzantine military history task force
453:Template:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
1406:Osborne and Vout, 2010 (of Wallace-Hadrill's
8:
1497:Sosius rebuilt the temple of Apollo Sosianus
1274:There's at least four factual claims there:
1917:GA-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
1882:Politics and government work group articles
1347:sfn error: no target: CITEREFSyme276-277 (
531:
398:
321:
243:
101:
1244:sfnm error: no target: CITEREFBroughton (
1328:sfn error: no target: CITEREFBroughton (
732:critical year', 'this rabid Antonian'.)
643:
286:This article is within the scope of the
1415:Christopher Stray, 2010 (esp. pp. 9-10)
1342:
1316:
1232:
562:
534:
400:
245:
103:
1867:Military biography work group articles
1857:GA-Class biography (military) articles
1520:
1514:
1511:sentence is run-on, or bordering on it
1508:
1502:
1496:
1488:
1145:trying to commemorate his own triumph.
306:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
296:. To use this banner, please see the
227:the politics and government work group
1912:Classical warfare task force articles
1509:Sosius and his colleague in office...
1323:
1239:
433:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
309:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
1613:
1521:may also have been Sosius' daughter.
1401:Christopher Smith, 2012 (esp. p.308)
1256:sfnm error: no target: CITEREFSyme (
685:; spelling and grammar are correct.
523:The following discussion is closed.
430:This article is within the scope of
156:This article is within the scope of
75:
73:
1907:GA-Class Classical warfare articles
1517:reword, language is a tad confusing
1505:clarify who was appointed governer.
1108:Let me know if I forgot something.
681:. the prose is clear, concise, and
92:It is of interest to the following
1892:GA-Class military history articles
456:Classical Greece and Rome articles
14:
1523:looks like a citation got dropped
1485:The lead could be expanded a bit.
207:the military biography work group
41:. If you can improve it further,
1825:The discussion above is closed.
1789:
1771:
1761:
1748:
1735:
1722:
1712:
1694:
1680:
1666:
1652:
1639:
1626:
1378:
1251:
1054:
1027:
994:
941:
917:
895:
873:
836:
814:
776:
754:
694:
671:
423:
402:
279:
247:
143:
133:
105:
74:
19:
1055:
470:This article has been rated as
180:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
1887:WikiProject Biography articles
1515:This missive was never read...
1277:Sosius became consul in 32 BC.
796:could reasonably be challenged
183:Template:WikiProject Biography
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
1821:01:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
1595:01:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
1570:14:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
1551:04:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
1465:15:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
1455:to take forward as you wish.
1450:15:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
1431:10:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
1203:00:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
1180:22:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
1118:21:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
1014:valid non-free use rationales
689:sources (see point 2 below).
640:12:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
625:12:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
516:01:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
351:Military biography task force
224:This article is supported by
204:This article is supported by
1772:
1762:
1749:
1736:
1723:
1713:
1707:
1695:
1681:
1667:
1653:
1640:
1627:
1605:
1028:
995:
942:
918:
896:
874:
837:
815:
777:
755:
695:
672:
383:Classical warfare task force
289:Military history WikiProject
168:contribute to the discussion
1852:GA-Class biography articles
1606:
1093:Oxford Classical Dictionary
1943:
1408:Rome's Cultural Revolution
766:the layout style guideline
476:project's importance scale
966:
861:
736:
659:
649:
469:
447:Classical Greece and Rome
418:
410:Classical Greece and Rome
381:
365:
349:
320:
312:military history articles
274:
223:
203:
128:
100:
1827:Please do not modify it.
646:
525:Please do not modify it.
1842:Knowledge good articles
1384:
1041:to the topic, and have
704:. it complies with the
630:I'll look at this one.
385:(c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)
325:Associated task forces:
122:Politics and Government
1503:was appointed governor
1381:
1306:
1222:
378:
362:
346:
220:
200:
82:This article is rated
57:: December 29, 2022. (
1847:History good articles
1786:Good Article criteria
1758:free or tagged images
866:Broad in its coverage
600:Talk:Gaius Sosius/GA1
377:
361:
345:
264:Roman & Byzantine
219:
199:
159:WikiProject Biography
39:good article criteria
33:History good articles
1457:UndercoverClassicist
1423:UndercoverClassicist
1172:UndercoverClassicist
1082:UndercoverClassicist
959:or content dispute.
848:copyright violations
826:no original research
747:no original research
632:UndercoverClassicist
611:UndercoverClassicist
1611:review progress box
1168:Suicide terminology
883:. it addresses the
794:. All content that
1788:. Criteria marked
1375:Second Triumvirate
1343:Syme & 276-277
1302:Second Triumvirate
1218:Second Triumvirate
1066:Overall assessment
1010:copyright statuses
973:, if possible, by
726:list incorporation
526:
379:
363:
347:
294:list of open tasks
221:
201:
186:biography articles
88:content assessment
1804:
1803:
1800:
1799:
1796:
1097:Brill's New Pauly
1076:
1075:
1043:suitable captions
1016:are provided for
846:. it contains no
590:
589:
524:
490:
489:
486:
485:
482:
481:
397:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
298:full instructions
242:
241:
238:
237:
68:
67:
64:
1934:
1819:
1793:
1782:
1775:
1774:
1765:
1764:
1752:
1751:
1739:
1738:
1726:
1725:
1716:
1715:
1698:
1697:
1684:
1683:
1670:
1669:
1656:
1655:
1643:
1642:
1630:
1629:
1614:
1604:
1593:
1549:
1533:
1353:
1352:
1340:
1334:
1333:
1321:
1263:
1261:
1249:
1237:
1189:and Broughton's
1187:Roman Revolution
1085:
1058:
1057:
1031:
1030:
1018:non-free content
998:
997:
945:
944:
921:
920:
899:
898:
877:
876:
840:
839:
818:
817:
788:reliable sources
780:
779:
758:
757:
698:
697:
675:
674:
644:
544:Copyvio detector
532:
514:
458:
457:
454:
451:
448:
427:
420:
419:
414:
406:
399:
332:
322:
314:
313:
310:
307:
304:
303:Military history
283:
276:
275:
270:
255:Military history
251:
244:
188:
187:
184:
181:
178:
164:join the project
153:
151:Biography portal
148:
147:
146:
137:
130:
129:
124:
109:
102:
85:
79:
78:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
1942:
1941:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1806:
1770:pics relevant (
1580:
1536:
1527:
1356:
1346:
1341:
1337:
1327:
1322:
1318:
1267:
1266:
1255:
1243:
1238:
1234:
1079:
708:guidelines for
706:Manual of Style
655:Review Comment
594:This review is
586:
558:
529:
520:
519:
518:
501:
495:
455:
452:
449:
446:
445:
412:
330:
311:
308:
305:
302:
301:
257:
185:
182:
179:
176:
175:
149:
144:
142:
115:
86:on Knowledge's
83:
58:
12:
11:
5:
1940:
1938:
1930:
1929:
1924:
1919:
1914:
1909:
1904:
1899:
1894:
1889:
1884:
1879:
1874:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1834:
1833:
1824:
1802:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1795:
1794:are unassessed
1779:
1778:
1706:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1597:
1558:MOS:LEADLENGTH
1525:
1524:
1518:
1512:
1506:
1500:
1494:
1486:
1480:Second opinion
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1411:
1402:
1393:
1389:
1388:
1382:
1369:
1355:
1354:
1335:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1307:
1296:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1281:
1278:
1265:
1264:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1223:
1212:
1163:
1146:
1142:
1134:
1126:
1121:
1120:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1101:
1089:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1059:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1032:
1024:
1023:
1021:
999:
991:
990:
964:
963:
960:
946:
938:
937:
934:
922:
914:
913:
910:
900:
892:
891:
888:
887:of the topic.
878:
870:
869:
859:
858:
855:
841:
833:
832:
829:
824:. it contains
819:
811:
810:
799:
781:
773:
772:
769:
759:
751:
750:
734:
733:
729:
718:words to watch
699:
691:
690:
686:
676:
668:
667:
657:
656:
653:
648:
629:
605:
604:
588:
587:
585:
584:
579:
574:
568:
565:
564:
560:
559:
557:
556:
554:External links
551:
546:
540:
537:
536:
530:
521:
499:
498:
497:
496:
494:
491:
488:
487:
484:
483:
480:
479:
472:Low-importance
468:
462:
461:
459:
428:
416:
415:
413:Low‑importance
407:
395:
394:
391:
390:
387:
386:
380:
370:
369:
364:
354:
353:
348:
338:
337:
335:
333:
327:
326:
318:
317:
315:
284:
272:
271:
252:
240:
239:
236:
235:
232:Low-importance
222:
212:
211:
202:
192:
191:
189:
155:
154:
138:
126:
125:
110:
98:
97:
91:
80:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1939:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1895:
1893:
1890:
1888:
1885:
1883:
1880:
1878:
1875:
1873:
1870:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1853:
1850:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1837:
1828:
1823:
1822:
1817:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1792:
1787:
1783:
1781:
1780:
1777:
1767:
1759:
1754:
1746:
1741:
1733:
1728:
1718:
1708:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1692:
1686:
1678:
1672:
1664:
1658:
1650:
1645:
1637:
1632:
1622:
1620:
1616:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1598:
1596:
1591:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1577:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1547:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1531:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1513:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1438:WP:CITEBUNDLE
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1419:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1370:
1367:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1350:
1344:
1339:
1336:
1331:
1325:
1320:
1317:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1285:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1259:
1254:, pp. 276–277
1253:
1247:
1241:
1236:
1233:
1224:
1221:
1219:
1213:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1132:
1127:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1078:
1077:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1053:
1052:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1000:
993:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
969:
965:
961:
958:
954:
950:
947:
940:
939:
935:
932:
931:
926:
923:
916:
915:
911:
908:
907:summary style
904:
901:
894:
893:
889:
886:
882:
879:
872:
871:
867:
864:
860:
856:
853:
849:
845:
842:
835:
834:
830:
827:
823:
820:
813:
812:
809:
805:
800:
797:
793:
789:
785:
782:
775:
774:
770:
767:
763:
760:
753:
752:
748:
744:
743:
739:
735:
730:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:lead sections
707:
703:
700:
693:
692:
687:
684:
680:
677:
670:
669:
665:
662:
658:
654:
652:
645:
642:
641:
637:
633:
627:
626:
622:
619:
616:
612:
609:
603:
601:
597:
592:
591:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
569:
567:
566:
561:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
542:
541:
539:
538:
533:
528:
517:
512:
508:
507:
506:
492:
477:
473:
467:
464:
463:
460:
443:
439:
435:
434:
429:
426:
422:
421:
417:
411:
408:
405:
401:
384:
376:
372:
371:
368:
360:
356:
355:
352:
344:
340:
339:
336:
334:
329:
328:
323:
319:
316:
299:
295:
291:
290:
285:
282:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
256:
253:
250:
246:
233:
230:(assessed as
229:
228:
218:
214:
213:
209:
208:
198:
194:
193:
190:
173:
172:documentation
169:
165:
161:
160:
152:
141:
139:
136:
132:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
111:
108:
104:
99:
95:
89:
81:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1826:
1809:
1808:
1805:
1769:
1756:
1743:
1730:
1720:
1710:
1688:
1674:
1660:
1647:
1634:
1624:
1617:
1609:Good Article
1607:
1583:
1582:
1539:
1538:
1526:
1479:
1478:
1407:
1385:
1372:
1338:
1319:
1299:
1235:
1215:
1208:
1190:
1186:
1150:
1137:
1131:WP:SYNTHESIS
1096:
1092:
1065:
1061:
1037:. media are
1034:
1004:. media are
1001:
974:
970:
967:
952:
948:
928:
924:
902:
885:main aspects
880:
865:
862:
843:
821:
806:
802:
792:cited inline
783:
761:
746:
740:
737:
701:
678:
664:Well-written
663:
660:
628:
617:
607:
606:
593:
582:Instructions
522:
504:
503:
471:
438:project page
431:
287:
225:
205:
157:
94:WikiProjects
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
27:Gaius Sosius
26:
1711:broadness (
1366:WP:BUNDLING
1191:Magistrates
1008:with their
971:Illustrated
596:transcluded
1836:Categories
1649:ref layout
1492:WP:PUFFERY
1151:everything
852:plagiarism
742:Verifiable
549:Authorship
535:GA toolbox
37:under the
1326:, p. 147.
1324:Broughton
1240:Broughton
651:Attribute
608:Reviewer:
572:Templates
563:Reviewing
493:GA Review
442:talk page
268:Classical
260:Biography
177:Biography
113:Biography
1619:Criteria
1242:, p. 417
1209:en masse
1100:and 30s.
1039:relevant
977:such as
957:edit war
621:contribs
577:Criteria
500:Passed.
118:Military
84:GA-class
47:reassess
1732:neutral
1721:focus (
1625:prose (
1576:Avilich
1562:Avilich
1530:Avilich
1442:Avilich
1195:Avilich
1110:Avilich
930:Neutral
722:fiction
474:on the
1810:Etrius
1745:stable
1661:cites
1584:Etrius
1579:GA!!!
1540:Etrius
1535:time.
1293:WP:TSI
1125:exist?
1012:, and
1006:tagged
979:images
953:Stable
724:, and
714:layout
505:Etrius
90:scale.
54:Review
1691:WP:CV
1677:WP:OR
1663:WP:RS
987:audio
985:, or
983:video
975:media
745:with
647:Rate
598:from
1768:6b.
1755:6a.
1719:3b.
1709:3a.
1687:2d.
1673:2c.
1659:2b.
1646:2a.
1633:1b.
1623:1a.
1566:talk
1461:talk
1446:talk
1427:talk
1349:help
1330:help
1258:help
1252:Syme
1246:help
1199:talk
1176:talk
1138:both
1114:talk
1095:and
790:are
636:talk
615:talk
166:and
1742:5.
1729:4.
1689:no
1675:no
1636:MoS
1136:Do
909:).
850:or
466:Low
49:it.
1838::
1816:Us
1590:Us
1568:)
1546:Us
1463:)
1448:)
1429:)
1250:;
1201:)
1178:)
1116:)
1068:.
1064:.
1045:.
1035:6b
1020:.
1002:6a
989::
981:,
968:6.
951:.
927:.
903:3b
881:3a
868::
863:3.
854:.
844:2d
828:.
822:2c
786:.
784:2b
768:.
762:2a
749::
738:2.
728:.
720:,
716:,
712:,
702:1b
679:1a
666::
661:1.
638:)
623:)
511:Us
331:/
266:/
262:/
258::
234:).
120:/
116::
63:).
1818:)
1814:(
1776:)
1766:)
1760:(
1753:)
1747:(
1740:)
1734:(
1727:)
1717:)
1699:)
1693:(
1685:)
1679:(
1671:)
1665:(
1657:)
1651:(
1644:)
1638:(
1631:)
1621::
1592:)
1588:(
1574:@
1564:(
1548:)
1544:(
1532::
1528:@
1459:(
1444:(
1425:(
1351:)
1345:.
1332:)
1262:.
1260:)
1248:)
1197:(
1174:(
1154:(
1112:(
1084::
1080:@
1062:7
949:5
925:4
634:(
618:·
613:(
513:)
509:(
478:.
444:.
300:.
210:.
174:.
96::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
