112:
207:
186:
217:
295:
102:
81:
50:
21:
390:, please. Note that my explanations below might be a tad more thorough than we are used to on these types of discussion pages, but I think it's important to thoroughly analyze new articles to ensure that Knowledge's guidelines are truly being adhered to. And in the case of Garden State Initiative, it should be clear that everything is pretty kosher here.
582:
Comment: It seems clear to me that the Garden State
Initiative article -- when looking at the actual text of it -- meets that description pretty solidly. Additionally, under the section header "Explanation of the neutral point of view" on the WP:NPOV policy page, it makes the following points:
571:
Policy citation: "All encyclopedic content on
Knowledge must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a
316:
650:
408:
Policy citation: "Knowledge bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product
387:
31:
513:
Policy citation: "How to apply the criteria . . . The primary criteria have five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
366:
481:
711:
681:
356:
168:
158:
716:
696:
277:
267:
706:
686:
676:
701:
691:
332:
469:
134:
643:
243:
239:
323:
300:
125:
86:
507:
Comment: I also looked at the "how to apply the criteria" on the
Notability (Organizations and companies" policy page on Knowledge.
230:
191:
658:
61:
625:
475:
27:
491:
the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
49:
489:
Policy citation: "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been
654:
621:
67:
440:
on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education."
386:
As the author of the Garden State
Initiative article, I'd like to address the concerns posted on the
383:\== How this article meets all the Knowledge criteria for standalone organization articles == Hello,
20:
117:
503:
QUALIFYING SOURCES: Three of the 12 sources meet the "how to apply the criteria" policy guideline
331:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
133:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
550:
496:
222:
443:
415:
639:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
562:
436:
Policy citation: "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please
670:
328:
430:
within the State of New Jersey, as described in several of the source news articles.
662:
629:
130:
394:
BASIC CRITERIA: GSI does meet the basic criteria for
Notability for organizations
206:
185:
315:
294:
235:
212:
107:
101:
80:
422:"SIGNIFICANT EFFECT": GSI does match the "significant effect" criteria.
438:
consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects
557:
NPOV POLICY: The article's text is compliant with the NPOV policy
400:
has attracted the notice of several legitimate news organizations
635:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
43:
15:
578:
NPOV EXPLANATION: This article hits all the main points.
593:"Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts."
561:
Comment: In terms of NPOV, the opening paragraph on the
426:
Comment: Garden State
Initiative's reports are having
611:"Indicate the relative prominence of opposing views."
398:
Comment: The subject/topic "Garden State
Initiative"
428:
a significant effect on policymaking and legislation
327:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
129:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
649:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
8:
450:"SIGNIFICANT COVERAGE": The organization is
410:has attracted the notice of reliable sources
388:discussion page about deleting this article
234:, an effort to create, expand, and improve
47:
412:unrelated to the organization or product."
289:
180:
75:
452:significantly covered in 3 ("multiple")
291:
182:
77:
7:
712:Low-importance organization articles
682:Low-importance Conservatism articles
613:(The article meets this requirement)
607:(The article meets this requirement)
601:(The article meets this requirement)
595:(The article meets this requirement)
589:(The article meets this requirement)
321:This article is within the scope of
123:This article is within the scope of
402:that are independent of each other.
341:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations
66:It is of interest to the following
717:WikiProject Organizations articles
697:Low-importance New Jersey articles
599:"Avoid stating facts as opinions."
587:"Avoid stating opinions as facts."
344:Template:WikiProject Organizations
143:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism
30:on 13 October 2019. The result of
14:
707:Start-Class organization articles
687:WikiProject Conservatism articles
677:Start-Class Conservatism articles
146:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
644:Garden State Initiative seal.png
605:"Prefer nonjudgmental language."
314:
293:
252:Knowledge:WikiProject New Jersey
215:
205:
184:
110:
100:
79:
48:
19:
702:WikiProject New Jersey articles
692:Start-Class New Jersey articles
361:This article has been rated as
272:This article has been rated as
255:Template:WikiProject New Jersey
163:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1:
620:Thanks everyone for reading.
458:Comment: Those three sources
335:and see a list of open tasks.
242:standard. Please join in the
137:and see a list of open tasks.
663:06:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
630:17:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
454:of the 12 sources I used.
733:
367:project's importance scale
278:project's importance scale
169:project's importance scale
360:
324:WikiProject Organizations
309:
271:
240:Knowledge feature-quality
200:
162:
95:
74:
228:This article is part of
126:WikiProject Conservatism
518:significant coverage in
465:The three sources are:
460:are independent of GSI
231:WikiProject New Jersey
56:This article is rated
347:organization articles
238:–related articles to
149:Conservatism articles
542:secondary sources."
258:New Jersey articles
118:Conservatism portal
655:Community Tech bot
565:policy page reads:
476:New Jersey Monthly
62:content assessment
622:Francisco Fredeye
381:
380:
377:
376:
373:
372:
288:
287:
284:
283:
223:New Jersey portal
179:
178:
175:
174:
42:
41:
724:
544:(Yep. Met that.)
538:(Yep. Met that.)
532:(Yep. Met that.)
526:(Yep. Met that.)
520:(Yep. Met that.)
349:
348:
345:
342:
339:
318:
311:
310:
305:
297:
290:
260:
259:
256:
253:
250:
225:
220:
219:
218:
209:
202:
201:
196:
188:
181:
151:
150:
147:
144:
141:
120:
115:
114:
113:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
732:
731:
727:
726:
725:
723:
722:
721:
667:
666:
651:nomination page
637:
346:
343:
340:
337:
336:
303:
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
221:
216:
214:
194:
148:
145:
142:
139:
138:
116:
111:
109:
89:
60:on Knowledge's
57:
12:
11:
5:
730:
728:
720:
719:
714:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
669:
668:
647:
646:
636:
633:
619:
617:
616:
615:
614:
608:
602:
596:
590:
577:
575:
574:
567:
566:
556:
554:
553:
547:
546:
545:
539:
533:
527:
521:
509:
508:
502:
500:
499:
486:
485:
484:
478:
472:
463:
449:
447:
446:
432:
431:
421:
419:
418:
404:
403:
393:
379:
378:
375:
374:
371:
370:
363:Low-importance
359:
353:
352:
350:
333:the discussion
319:
307:
306:
304:Low‑importance
298:
286:
285:
282:
281:
274:Low-importance
270:
264:
263:
261:
227:
226:
210:
198:
197:
195:Low‑importance
189:
177:
176:
173:
172:
165:Low-importance
161:
155:
154:
152:
135:the discussion
122:
121:
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
729:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
674:
672:
665:
664:
660:
656:
652:
645:
642:
641:
640:
634:
632:
631:
627:
623:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
584:
581:
580:
579:
573:
569:
568:
564:
560:
559:
558:
552:
548:
543:
540:
537:
534:
531:
528:
525:
522:
519:
516:
515:
514:
511:
510:
506:
505:
504:
498:
494:
492:
487:
483:
479:
477:
473:
471:
467:
466:
464:
461:
457:
456:
455:
453:
445:
441:
439:
434:
433:
429:
425:
424:
423:
417:
413:
411:
406:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
391:
389:
384:
368:
364:
358:
355:
354:
351:
338:Organizations
334:
330:
329:Organizations
326:
325:
320:
317:
313:
312:
308:
302:
301:Organizations
299:
296:
292:
279:
275:
269:
266:
265:
262:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
224:
213:
211:
208:
204:
203:
199:
193:
190:
187:
183:
170:
166:
160:
157:
156:
153:
136:
132:
128:
127:
119:
108:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
648:
638:
618:
610:
604:
598:
592:
586:
576:
570:
555:
541:
535:
530:independent,
529:
523:
517:
512:
501:
490:
488:
470:NJ Spotlight
459:
451:
448:
437:
435:
427:
420:
409:
407:
399:
392:
385:
382:
362:
322:
273:
229:
164:
140:Conservatism
131:conservatism
124:
87:Conservatism
68:WikiProjects
36:no consensus
35:
551:WP:ORGCRITE
497:WP:ORGCRITE
58:Start-class
671:Categories
249:New Jersey
244:discussion
236:New Jersey
192:New Jersey
444:WP:ORGSIG
549:Source:
536:reliable
524:multiple
480:Ref #3:
474:Ref #2:
468:Ref #1:
416:WP:ORGIN
28:deletion
572:topic."
563:WP:NPOV
365:on the
276:on the
167:on the
482:ROI-NJ
64:scale.
659:talk
626:talk
34:was
653:. —
357:Low
268:Low
159:Low
673::
661:)
628:)
495:-
442:-
414:-
657:(
624:(
493:"
462:.
369:.
280:.
246:.
171:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
