264:"At the Battle of Antietam, Meade assumed command of the I Corps after Hooker was wounded and the ranking division commander, James B. Ricketts, was injured when his horse was shot from underneath him" - while Eicher does mention Meade taking command of the I Corps, Eicher doesn't have the detail about the injuries to Hooker and Ricketts. The other cited source, Warner, doesn't have those details either
254:"The four generals, Reynolds, John Sedgwick, Henry Slocum, and Winfield Hancock, recommended him for command of the army and agreed to serve under him despite outranking him" - not seeing how this is entirely support by Tagg pp. 2-3, which references Reynolds, Slocum, and Darius Couch as the three generals who recommended Meade and indicated willingness to serve under him
73:
237:
Grant and intimated that he felt most deserving of the rank, by virtue of merit and seniority; nevertheless, Grant nominated
Sheridan to the rank over the senior Meade, and the latter effectively served in semi-retirement as the commander of the Military Division of the Atlantic from his home in Philadelphia
278:
I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to quick-fail this one. With uncited text, unreliable sources, and spots where not all of the content is supported by the sources, these needs a fair bit of work before it's close to GA status. If you disagree with my decision to quick-fail, you can ask for a second
236:
In 1869, following Grant's inauguration as president, Sherman succeeded him to the rank of
General of the Army, opening up the Lieutenant General rank. At the time, the senior-most Major Generals were Halleck (who, by then, was an outcast), and then Meade. Before the inauguration, Meade met with
231:
the notable relatives should be worked into the prose somewhere, not just thrown in as a list (this would probably best be done by mentioning his wife/children briefly and then stating that those folks are descended from
251:"although the aggressive maneuvering that eventually cornered Lee in the trenches around Petersburg were Grant's initiative as well" - Rhea p. 14 is discussing mid-May performances and makes no mention of Petersburg
269:
In all of these cases, Grant bears some of the responsibility for approving Meade's plans, but Meade's performance was not at the same level of competence he displayed on other occasions
111:
196:
I'll review this over the weekend. I'm moderately familiar with Meade and own print copies of a few of the sources, so I figured I'd go ahead and review this.
78:
101:
225:" "10 Things You Didn't Know About the Cast of Lost". www.thethings.com. www.thethings.com. Retrieved February 8, 2023." - probably not a reliable source
228:
the in popular culture section should almost certainly be removed - these are all trivial things that don't warrant a mention in an article of this form
157:
153:
83:
138:
106:
187:
57:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
303:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
248:- While Rhea p. 259 does discuss Meade not wanting to attack fortifications, it doesn't make this contrast that I'm seeing
130:
257:"and was brevetted to first lieutenant for gallant conduct at the Battle of Monterrey" - Warner p. 316 doesn't state
246:
Meade, despite his aggressive performance in lesser commands in 1862, had become a more cautious general
239:- this entire paragraph is sourced only to a one-page book review, which doesn't support this content
289:
280:
267:
Several instances of opinions needing inline attribution to the authors who stated these things:
202:
181:
40:
146:
17:
284:
197:
177:
35:
273:
He has been accused of not being aggressive enough in pursuit of
Confederate forces,
123:
272:
268:
245:
242:
There's a couple CN tags that should have been resolved before taking this to GAN
235:
294:
207:
191:
45:
165:
134:
219:
history.com is no longer considered a reliable source
8:
61:
92:
64:
7:
53:The following discussion is closed.
24:
216:rootsweb is not a reliable source
299:The discussion above is closed.
1:
295:03:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
208:00:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
192:00:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
46:03:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
318:
301:Please do not modify it.
55:Please do not modify it.
261:he received this brevet
56:
120:
119:
54:
18:Talk:George Meade
309:
274:
270:
247:
238:
170:
161:
142:
74:Copyvio detector
62:
317:
316:
312:
311:
310:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
293:
206:
151:
128:
122:
116:
88:
59:
50:
49:
48:
44:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
315:
313:
298:
287:
276:
275:
265:
262:
255:
252:
249:
243:
240:
233:
229:
226:
223:
222:hmdb is not RS
220:
217:
212:For starters:
200:
171:
118:
117:
115:
114:
109:
104:
98:
95:
94:
90:
89:
87:
86:
84:External links
81:
76:
70:
67:
66:
60:
51:
38:
34:Unsuccessful.
33:
32:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
314:
302:
297:
296:
292:
291:
286:
282:
266:
263:
260:
256:
253:
250:
244:
241:
234:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
214:
213:
210:
209:
205:
204:
199:
194:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:
164:
159:
155:
150:
149:
145:
140:
136:
132:
127:
126:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
99:
97:
96:
91:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
71:
69:
68:
63:
58:
47:
43:
42:
37:
26:
19:
300:
288:
277:
258:
211:
201:
195:
184:
174:
173:
166:
162:
148:Article talk
147:
143:
124:
121:
112:Instructions
52:
39:
279:hearing at
135:visual edit
79:Authorship
65:GA toolbox
175:Reviewer:
102:Templates
93:Reviewing
27:GA Review
285:Hog Farm
198:Hog Farm
188:contribs
178:Hog Farm
107:Criteria
36:Hog Farm
158:history
139:history
125:Article
281:WT:GAN
167:Watch
16:<
290:Talk
271:and
232:him)
203:Talk
182:talk
154:edit
131:edit
41:Talk
259:why
283:.
190:)
156:|
137:|
133:|
185:·
180:(
163:·
160:)
152:(
144:·
141:)
129:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.