42:
194:
In a nutshell, the size increased as the armament increased. Guns and all the necessary equipment weigh quite a bit, and increases there mean higher displacements, which require either improved propulsion systems or longer, finer hulls to reach the same speed. Of course, a longer hull displaces more
182:
The measurements are good, but there isn't much discussion about what and how the design was supposed to be improved over the Cöln class. Looks like the complement of 15-in guns was supposed to be reduced, and torpedo tubes to be added. It also looks like the crew complement was to be significantly
47:
166:
I don't see any timelines as to when any of the plans were drawn up or submitted. These might be helpful. When were they first called for, and when were the ultimately cancelled.
208:
Also, the lead says the design was cancelled because the end of the war, while the body of the article says it was because the German Navy changed its shipbuilding strategy.
126:
216:
No duplicate links or disambiguation links detected. No external links to check. There are no images to check, and I see no problems with article stability or neutrality.
80:
191:
Excepting that, some comparison might be helpful, or at least some explanation as to why the size of the ships were so drastically increased during the design process.
122:
70:
107:
52:
99:
195:
than a shorter one, so there's something of a vicious circle going on as the designers tried to find the right balance between size, power, and speed.
183:
reduced. Did they have a different utilization in mind for the cruisers, or were there design problems that they sought to overcome?
75:
115:
17:
186:
Essentially, they were intended to emphasize scouting rather than engaging enemy cruisers, hence the much higher speed
156:
92:
239:
259:
243:
229:
160:
235:
150:
169:
It was all done in 1916, though I don't know when exactly each design was completed.
174:
Were there ever any projections on how many of the ships might be constructed?
252:
222:
146:
134:
103:
221:
Placing the article on hold pending a few changes. —
200:No citation for crew complement in the infobox.
177:None that I've been able to find, unfortunately.
8:
30:
61:
33:
234:Thanks for reviewing the article, Ed.
7:
24:
18:Talk:German FK cruiser designs
1:
251:Great work! Passing the GA. —
275:
260:01:41, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
244:19:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
230:14:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
161:13:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
203:Added to the body
89:
88:
266:
257:
227:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
274:
273:
269:
268:
267:
265:
264:
263:
253:
223:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
272:
270:
249:
248:
247:
246:
218:
217:
214:
213:
212:
206:
205:
204:
198:
197:
196:
189:
188:
187:
180:
179:
178:
172:
171:
170:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
271:
262:
261:
258:
256:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
228:
226:
220:
219:
215:
210:
209:
207:
202:
201:
199:
193:
192:
190:
185:
184:
181:
176:
175:
173:
168:
167:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
254:
250:
224:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
236:Parsecboy
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
211:Fixed
136:Watch
16:<
240:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
255:Ed!
225:Ed!
147:Ed!
242:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
238:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.