42:
354:
The following is completely anecdotal, but I'm wondering if some corroboration can be had anywhere. My grandfather served on the Blücher and related that most of the soldiers on board were mountaineers. He believed that many of them hadn't ever seen the ocean, and that few could even swim. When the
229:
As always, this is all set, from what I can see. The article is well-referenced, and inline citations/a separate ref section is used. Because the sources are offline and inaccessible to me, I will accept 2c (NOR) in good faith.
305:
In any case, Parsecboy, I hope your transition to World War II-era ships continues to go smoothly. This is pretty much already a good article, and I'll pass it as such once the remaining comments are addressed.
176:
In the
Construction section, why was the ship "to have" the other guns? Was her anti-aircraft battery not installed before she sank? If so (or if not), the this reason should be clarified in this section.
179:
I remember being told in previous GA reviews that wikilinks do not need to be repeated. If this is true, then you can/should de-wikilink Oslo, Oslofjord, Oscarsborg
Fortress, and Oskar Kummetz.
47:
190:, both of which were unfinished - must have had that still on my mind :) As for links, I like to link in the lead and the first time in the body, which I think is fine per
126:
80:
355:
ship went down, a great many of them apparently abandoned ship with their life vests, but also with all their gear and tackle. Most went under and never came back up.
122:
70:
318:
Thanks for reviewing the article, Starstriker7. And as for editing articles on WWII-era ships, I've been all over the board over the last couple of years, the
107:
52:
99:
339:
If you're gonna answer that, do it on my talk page, because this article's all set to pass. I will do so in a moment. As always, good work. :) --
272:
Thanks for catching those. As for "recognition drawing", I seem to think someone asked the same question at a recent FAC (maybe one of
362:
75:
336:
How do you remain so dedicated to writing all these ship articles? I feel burned out after writing only about fifty planet articles.
187:
298:
This was a pretty fun read. I've seldom imagine World War II like this, and it feels like someone could make the story of the
115:
17:
319:
92:
183:
358:
191:
366:
246:
The article is written in a neutral tone. There are no sides to whom you can really give due weight.
327:
281:
273:
199:
276:?) and the conclusion was that there isn't an article that would make a good link for the term.
370:
345:
341:
331:
312:
308:
285:
214:
210:
208:
Alright! Thank you also for clarifying that section of MOS for me. I'll keep it in mind. :) --
203:
162:
158:
151:
147:
323:
277:
195:
266:
In the third image's caption, replace "Norway, from" with "Norway as seen from"
173:
In Note 1, a period should go at the end of the second sentence.
263:
Can "Recognition drawing" (second picture) be wikilinked?
134:
103:
269:
In the last image caption, Oscarsborg is misspelled.
182:Should all be fixed - I wrote this one after doing
8:
30:
238:Article is both broad and well-focused.
61:
33:
7:
322:were sort of a diversion for me :)
24:
254:All quiet in the edit history.
1:
302:into some sort of movie. :P
188:German cruiser Lützow (1939)
346:01:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
332:23:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
313:15:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
286:23:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
215:01:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
204:23:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
163:14:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
152:14:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
18:Talk:German cruiser Blücher
387:
371:19:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
156:I've got this review. --
184:German cruiser Seydlitz
361:comment added by
89:
88:
378:
373:
294:Overall comments
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
386:
385:
381:
380:
379:
377:
376:
375:
356:
296:
260:
252:
244:
236:
227:
170:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
384:
382:
353:
351:
350:
349:
348:
337:
295:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
267:
264:
259:
256:
251:
248:
243:
240:
235:
232:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
177:
174:
169:
166:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
383:
374:
372:
368:
364:
360:
347:
344:
343:
338:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
315:
314:
311:
310:
303:
301:
293:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:
268:
265:
262:
261:
257:
255:
249:
247:
241:
239:
233:
231:
224:
216:
213:
212:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:WP:REPEATLINK
189:
185:
181:
180:
178:
175:
172:
171:
167:
165:
164:
161:
160:
154:
153:
150:
149:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
363:4.79.245.176
357:— Preceding
352:
342:Starstriker7
340:
309:Starstriker7
307:
304:
299:
297:
253:
245:
237:
228:
211:Starstriker7
209:
159:Starstriker7
157:
155:
148:Starstriker7
146:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
258:Criterion 6
250:Criterion 5
242:Criterion 4
234:Criterion 3
225:Criterion 2
168:Criterion 1
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
324:Parsecboy
320:ironclads
278:Parsecboy
196:Parsecboy
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
359:unsigned
76:Criteria
300:Blücher
127:history
108:history
94:Article
136:Watch
16:<
367:talk
328:talk
282:talk
274:Ed's
200:talk
186:and
123:edit
100:edit
369:)
330:)
306:--
284:)
202:)
194:.
125:|
106:|
102:|
365:(
326:(
280:(
198:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.