263:
500:
490:
478:
470:
461:
451:
441:
420:
410:
400:
385:
377:
369:
361:
353:
340:
330:
287:
279:
271:
255:
42:
295:
511:
A very concise and informative account. I can't see that the article will expand much or that there is scope for further improvement. It has reached GA very easily and I was struggling to find ways by which I could help you to improve it. I see you've written a number of these pieces and, as I'm
303:
If you can address the points made, I will do a final review against the GA criteria. It is close to the standard already and should not need much extra effort to get there. It is a very interesting and certainly well-written account. I won't put it on hold just yet.
407:(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, contentious material relating to living persons and counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged –
47:
126:
122:
107:
52:
241:
6. The article ends rather abruptly and needs a brief epilogue to round things off. What happened to the wreck and was any salvage attempted? What became of the captain and crew?
99:
80:
70:
397:(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout –
115:
17:
249:
I've checked the article against standard B-class criteria to understand its current status and it would be C-class given the points raised above:
92:
75:
300:
Re criterion 6, I haven't studied the categories and templates yet as I need to compare with other similar articles.
197:
3. Need to clarify years: i.e., minefield in the Thames estuary in
November 1939; Operation Weserübung in April 1940
487:(a) images are tagged with their copyright status and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content –
521:
313:
168:
154:
517:
309:
164:
159:
I will review this article for GA. I haven't read it yet but will record first impressions soon. --
150:
181:
1. Please provide a citation in "Design and description" for the length and weight statistics
268:
3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
205:
4. "The ships exchanged fire without effect until Hipper was spotted an hour later and sank
513:
305:
160:
146:
284:
5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images or diagrams.
189:
2. I'd prefer the career section to be subdivided into sub-sections for better structure
260:
2. It reasonably covers the topic and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
178:
Having read this very interesting article, I have the following points and questions:
252:
1. It is suitably referenced and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
512:
always looking for material about WWII, I'll be reading those too. Well done. --
292:
6. It is fully and correctly categorised and carries all appropriate templates.
237:
Another ship. If von Arnim had been his flagship, it would have been mentioned.
427:(d) science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines –
448:(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail –
497:(b) images are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions –
209:
shortly afterward" is ambiguous and needs to be reworded. Did
347:(c) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for:
134:
103:
185:
Cite #1 covers everything in the paragraph before it.
438:(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic –
229:5. Tell us a bit about Commander Bey. Was he on
276:4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
8:
337:(b) the spelling and grammar are correct –
30:
18:Talk:German destroyer Z11 Bernd von Arnim
417:(c) it contains no original research –
61:
33:
245:Done. Nothing known about any salvage.
483:illustrated, if possible, by images:
327:(a) the prose is clear and concise –
7:
393:factually accurate and verifiable:
294:
24:
498:
488:
476:
468:
459:
449:
439:
418:
408:
398:
383:
375:
367:
359:
351:
338:
328:
293:
285:
277:
269:
261:
253:
458:(c) it uses a summary style –
1:
499:
489:
477:
469:
460:
450:
440:
419:
409:
399:
384:
376:
368:
360:
352:
339:
329:
286:
278:
270:
262:
254:
537:
522:15:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
434:broad in its coverage:
314:19:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
169:13:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
155:13:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
382:list incorporation –
319:Good article criteria
366:words to watch –
233:or another ship?
89:
88:
528:
502:
501:
492:
491:
480:
479:
472:
471:
463:
462:
453:
452:
443:
442:
422:
421:
412:
411:
402:
401:
387:
386:
379:
378:
371:
370:
363:
362:
355:
354:
350:lead sections –
342:
341:
332:
331:
297:
296:
289:
288:
281:
280:
273:
272:
265:
264:
257:
256:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
509:
323:well-written:
321:
176:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
508:
505:
504:
503:
494:
493:
465:
464:
455:
454:
445:
444:
432:
431:
429:not applicable
424:
423:
414:
413:
404:
403:
391:
390:
389:
388:
380:
372:
364:
356:
344:
343:
334:
333:
320:
317:
247:
246:
239:
238:
227:
226:
203:
202:
195:
194:
187:
186:
175:
174:Initial review
172:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
524:
523:
519:
515:
506:
496:
495:
486:
485:
484:
481:
473:
457:
456:
447:
446:
437:
436:
435:
430:
426:
425:
416:
415:
406:
405:
396:
395:
394:
381:
373:
365:
357:
349:
348:
346:
345:
336:
335:
326:
325:
324:
318:
316:
315:
311:
307:
301:
298:
290:
282:
274:
266:
258:
250:
244:
243:
242:
236:
235:
234:
232:
224:
223:
222:
220:
216:
212:
208:
200:
199:
198:
192:
191:
190:
184:
183:
182:
179:
173:
171:
170:
166:
162:
157:
156:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
510:
482:
474:
466:
433:
428:
392:
322:
302:
299:
291:
283:
275:
267:
259:
251:
248:
240:
230:
228:
218:
214:
210:
206:
204:
196:
188:
180:
177:
158:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
514:Mykleavens
467:neutral –
374:fiction –
306:Mykleavens
161:Mykleavens
147:Mykleavens
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
475:stable –
358:layout –
231:von Armin
215:von Arnim
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
219:Glowworm
207:Glowworm
76:Criteria
507:Summary
127:history
108:history
94:Article
211:Hipper
225:Done.
217:sink
201:Done.
193:Done.
136:Watch
16:<
518:talk
310:talk
165:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
213:or
520:)
312:)
304:--
221:?
167:)
153:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
516:(
308:(
163:(
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.