864:
836:
731:
692:
667:
600:
816:
796:
756:
708:
651:
631:
564:
311:
298:
285:
252:
236:
223:
269:
61:
265:
repository, correct me if I'm wrong but that isn't the most reliable. The information found in the reference doesn't show the sentences or ideas that's being referenced by it.
99:
198:
89:
786:
594:
433:
66:
530:
94:
661:
558:
190:
175:
145:
71:
790:
141:
806:
641:
574:
554:
778:
126:
782:
617:
422:
section isn't incorporated into the lead as the lead only talks about the GitHub support. It also seems a little
750:
686:
278:
The 6th reference is primary but it is in the same boat as the first one, if it could be replaced it'd be better
857:
because of the above issues. There are too many current issues that need to be addressed before this becomes a
118:
339:
This section will only talk about the lead section and will not include any issues with any other sections
423:
345:
36:
213:
875:
429:
One or two paragraphs would fix most of the problems with this section. Currently it's just a list.
169:
770:
702:
625:
582:
854:
534:
495:
In the article referenced, it says Mike
Barlett. Why isn't he mentioned anywhere in the article?
294:
The 7th reference mentions Gitter once but when it's mentioned, it's mentioned in great detail
721:
578:
371:
810:
590:
586:
32:
858:
645:
870:
165:
370:
The lead has lots of information that isn't mentioned anywhere else, which is against
483:
446:
398:
343:
277:
260:
211:
515:
306:
293:
280:
247:
231:
218:
194:
134:
17:
550:
365:
piece of software with the free option providing all the basic features "
362:
355:
387:
This section is just a list and not a very good one at that. The "Apps"
468:
417:
390:
326:
262:
111:
882:
358:" piece of software? The wording in this sentence is a little off.
179:
40:
244:
The 3rd reference I can't speak of because I don't speak German.
426:
or could be reworded in a drastic way to make it legible.
414:
The "Integrations with non-GitHub sites and applications"
395:
section isn't incorporated into the lead nor the
Infobox.
383:
This section will cover all the subsections of "Features"
153:
122:
863:
348:, with a free option providing all basic features
507:There's already a tag there ({{expand-section}})
31:Only for GitHub? I think it should be changed
323:, with all this said, the "Pervasive logging"
8:
805:B. Images are provided if possible and are
462:This section seems a little... Advertise-y.
432:If it is going to be a list, make it like
49:
514:Apart from that, this section is pretty
80:
52:
484:Gitter was created by some developers
7:
407:Does this mean "Similar to GitHub"?
728:Fair representation without bias:
561:, or spelling and grammar errors:
331:section has no references at all.
24:
261:The 5th reference is a link to a
216:, it would be better if it wasn't
862:
834:
814:
794:
754:
729:
706:
690:
665:
649:
629:
598:
562:
309:
296:
283:
267:
250:
234:
221:
465:Nothing in "Pervasive logging"
1:
853:I'm failing this article for
626:appropriate reference section
41:10:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
835:
815:
795:
755:
730:
707:
691:
666:
650:
630:
599:
563:
447:Like other chat technologies
441:Advantages and disadvantages
898:
382:
338:
248:The 4th reference is fine.
232:The 2nd reference is fine.
883:07:24, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
787:valid fair use rationales
774:to illustrate the topic?
307:The 8th reference is fine
180:03:57, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
809:to the topic, and have
544:reasonably well written
354:Does this mean it's a "
212:The 1st reference is a
344:Gitter is provided as
680:broad in its coverage
346:software-as-a-service
185:Comments and Feedback
662:No original research
281:but it's fine as is.
219:but it's fine as is.
613:factually accurate
811:suitable captions
789:are provided for
642:in-line citations
525:Criteria (Review)
472:
421:
394:
330:
214:primary reference
108:
107:
889:
880:
878:
873:
866:
865:
838:
837:
818:
817:
798:
797:
791:non-free content
783:copyright status
758:
757:
733:
732:
710:
709:
694:
693:
669:
668:
653:
652:
646:reliable sources
633:
632:
602:
601:
566:
565:
517:
485:
466:
448:
434:what's said here
415:
400:
388:
349:
324:
316:
313:
312:
308:
303:
300:
299:
295:
290:
287:
286:
282:
279:
274:
271:
270:
266:
257:
254:
253:
249:
241:
238:
237:
233:
228:
225:
224:
220:
217:
196:
158:
149:
130:
62:Copyvio detector
50:
897:
896:
892:
891:
890:
888:
887:
886:
876:
871:
869:
577:compliance for
527:
504:
480:
443:
399:GitHub-flavored
384:
381:
340:
337:
314:
310:
301:
297:
288:
284:
272:
268:
255:
251:
239:
235:
226:
222:
208:
187:
139:
116:
110:
104:
76:
48:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
895:
893:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
833:Pass or Fail:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
803:
802:
801:
777:A. Images are
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
699:
698:
697:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
658:
657:
656:
638:
637:
636:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
587:words to watch
571:
570:
569:
526:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
509:
508:
503:
502:Implementation
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
493:
487:
486:
479:
476:
475:
474:
473:is referenced.
463:
459:
458:
457:
456:
450:
449:
442:
439:
438:
437:
430:
427:
411:
410:
409:
408:
402:
401:
396:
380:
377:
376:
375:
367:
366:
359:
351:
350:
336:
333:
318:
317:
304:
291:
275:
258:
245:
242:
229:
207:
204:
203:
202:
186:
183:
159:
106:
105:
103:
102:
97:
92:
86:
83:
82:
78:
77:
75:
74:
72:External links
69:
64:
58:
55:
54:
47:
44:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
894:
885:
884:
881:
879:
874:
860:
856:
845:
844:
842:
832:
831:
829:
826:
820:
819:
812:
808:
804:
800:
799:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
775:
773:
772:
766:
760:
759:
752:
748:
747:
745:
741:
735:
734:
727:
726:
724:
723:
718:
712:
711:
704:
700:
696:
695:
688:
687:Major aspects
684:
683:
681:
677:
671:
670:
663:
659:
655:
654:
647:
643:
639:
635:
634:
627:
623:
622:
620:
619:
614:
610:
604:
603:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
567:
560:
556:
552:
549:A. Prose is "
548:
547:
545:
541:
540:
539:
538:
536:
533:review – see
532:
524:
513:
512:
511:
510:
506:
505:
501:
494:
491:
490:
489:
488:
482:
481:
477:
470:
464:
461:
460:
454:
453:
452:
451:
445:
444:
440:
435:
431:
428:
425:
419:
413:
412:
406:
405:
404:
403:
397:
392:
386:
385:
378:
373:
369:
368:
364:
361:"Gitter is a
360:
357:
353:
352:
347:
342:
341:
334:
332:
328:
322:
305:
292:
276:
264:
259:
246:
243:
230:
215:
210:
209:
205:
200:
192:
189:
188:
184:
182:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
160:
157:
156:
152:
147:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
115:
114:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
85:
84:
79:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
59:
57:
56:
51:
45:
43:
42:
38:
34:
26:
19:
867:
859:good article
852:
840:
827:
768:
743:
720:
679:
616:
612:
543:
537:for criteria
529:
528:
320:
319:
172:
162:
161:
154:
150:
136:Article talk
135:
131:
112:
109:
100:Instructions
30:
781:with their
557:", without
123:visual edit
18:Talk:Gitter
624:A. Has an
618:verifiable
206:References
67:Authorship
53:GA toolbox
33:Tech201805
751:edit wars
644:are from
469:Quicklink
455:Examples?
418:Quicklink
391:Quicklink
327:Quicklink
199:Detection
166:Anarchyte
163:Reviewer:
90:Templates
81:Reviewing
46:GA Review
807:relevant
769:contain
767:Does it
559:copyvios
535:WP:WIAGA
379:Features
363:freemium
356:Freemium
321:Although
193:rating:
176:contribs
95:Criteria
828:Overall
753:, etc:
722:neutral
703:Focused
640:B. All
591:fiction
555:concise
478:History
424:useless
372:WP:LEAD
146:history
127:history
113:Article
785:, and
779:tagged
771:images
744:stable
742:Is it
719:Is it
678:Is it
611:Is it
593:, and
583:layout
542:Is it
263:GitHub
191:Copvio
27:GitHub
877:chyte
595:lists
551:clear
155:Watch
16:<
872:Anar
841:Fail
615:and
579:lead
553:and
516:good
492:Who?
335:Lead
195:9.9%
170:talk
142:edit
119:edit
37:talk
749:No
701:B.
685:A.
660:C.
575:MoS
573:B.
868:--
861:.
855:GA
843:)
830::
813::
793::
746:?
725:?
705::
689::
682:?
664::
648::
628::
621:?
597::
589:,
585:,
581:,
546:?
531:GA
178:)
144:|
125:|
121:|
39:)
839:(
518:.
471:)
467:(
436:.
420:)
416:(
393:)
389:(
374:.
329:)
325:(
315:Y
302:Y
289:Y
273:N
256:Y
240:Y
227:Y
201:)
197:(
173:·
168:(
151:·
148:)
140:(
132:·
129:)
117:(
35:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.