Knowledge

Talk:Gindling Hilltop Camp

Source 📝

206: 194: 112: 81: 234: 122: 271: 50: 21: 320:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
388:
While this article did survive an AfD, it still needs to be restricted to verifiable information. There have apparently been a couple of articles about the camp. Those should be added as sources and everything that isn't in a source deleted.
495:
Please don't add back old material without finding sources for it. This material is not encyclopedic and does not belong in this project. I suggest that the camp get its own website and host the text there under the GFDL license.
243: 95: 219: 91: 365:
Fair notice: I'm going to start deleting material soon that isn't on the only source we have for this article - the camp's website. All articles on Knowledge have comply with a core policy,
317:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
424: 31: 553: 248: 558: 548: 416: 543: 538: 224: 528: 184: 174: 298:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with 435:. Might be better to write one unified article that can stand on the notability of both instead of two of marginal-at-best sufficient notability each. 563: 533: 523: 295: 322: 314: 310: 287: 150: 326: 390: 370: 350: 468:
Ah, I see "Wilshire Boulevard Temple Camps" mentioned in the text. That'd be a fine title, and the ocamp names can be redirects.
135: 86: 419:, but now it's back and it doesn't look any better than it did before. It also suffers from many of the same problems as 61: 211: 349:
requires that everything in WP articles be verifiable by other editors. How can we verify what's in this article?
27: 431:
if all the campcruft, lore, and other generic camp brochure info were to be removed? Kramer is already nearly
427:. Is there anything notable about Kramer to make it stand alone? Is there anything viable and notable there 49: 306: 278: 503: 475: 457: 420: 396: 376: 356: 67: 282:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
20: 332: 193: 149:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
283: 127: 498: 470: 452: 440: 432: 412: 393: 373: 353: 270: 517: 299: 233: 111: 80: 509: 481: 463: 444: 436: 399: 379: 366: 359: 346: 335: 201: 145: 140: 117: 450:
I agree, though I'm not sure what we'd name the resulting article.
43: 15: 269: 232: 192: 294:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
139:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 325:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 345:I don't see any outside sources for this article. 8: 554:Low-importance Southern California articles 266:Fair use rationale for Image:Circlelogo.gif 75: 47: 423:did prior to the cleanup resulting from 30:on 4 December 2008 (UTC). The result of 559:Southern California task force articles 549:Stub-Class Southern California articles 77: 315:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline 7: 544:Los Angeles area task force articles 133:This article is within the scope of 539:Low-importance Los Angeles articles 66:It is of interest to the following 529:Low-importance California articles 14: 313:. Using one of the templates at 204: 159:Knowledge:WikiProject California 120: 110: 79: 48: 19: 564:WikiProject California articles 534:Stub-Class Los Angeles articles 179:This article has been rated as 162:Template:WikiProject California 26:This article was nominated for 524:Stub-Class California articles 327:Media copyright questions page 244:Southern California task force 1: 510:08:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 482:21:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 464:21:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 445:21:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 400:20:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 296:boilerplate fair use template 241:This article is supported by 217:This article is supported by 153:and see a list of open tasks. 360:05:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 336:16:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 323:criteria for speedy deletion 220:Los Angeles area task force 580: 380:04:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC) 307:the image description page 212:Greater Los Angeles portal 185:project's importance scale 309:and edit it to include a 240: 200: 178: 105: 74: 288:explanation or rationale 425:its deletion discussion 274: 237: 197: 136:WikiProject California 56:This article is rated 421:Gindling Hilltop Camp 290:as to why its use in 273: 236: 196: 279:Image:Circlelogo.gif 165:California articles 96:Southern California 491:Unsourced material 311:fair use rationale 275: 238: 198: 62:content assessment 263: 262: 259: 258: 255: 254: 128:California portal 42: 41: 571: 506: 501: 478: 473: 460: 455: 433:speedy-deletable 413:Camp Hess Kramer 286:but there is no 214: 209: 208: 207: 167: 166: 163: 160: 157: 130: 125: 124: 123: 114: 107: 106: 101: 98: 83: 76: 59: 53: 52: 44: 23: 16: 579: 578: 574: 573: 572: 570: 569: 568: 514: 513: 504: 499: 493: 476: 471: 458: 453: 415:was previously 410: 343: 268: 210: 205: 203: 164: 161: 158: 155: 154: 126: 121: 119: 99: 89: 60:on Knowledge's 57: 12: 11: 5: 577: 575: 567: 566: 561: 556: 551: 546: 541: 536: 531: 526: 516: 515: 492: 489: 487: 485: 484: 466: 409: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 383: 382: 342: 339: 333:BetacommandBot 267: 264: 261: 260: 257: 256: 253: 252: 249:Low-importance 239: 229: 228: 225:Low-importance 216: 215: 199: 189: 188: 181:Low-importance 177: 171: 170: 168: 151:the discussion 132: 131: 115: 103: 102: 100:Low‑importance 84: 72: 71: 65: 54: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 576: 565: 562: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 521: 519: 512: 511: 508: 507: 502: 490: 488: 483: 480: 479: 474: 467: 465: 462: 461: 456: 449: 448: 447: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 407: 401: 398: 395: 392: 387: 386: 385: 384: 381: 378: 375: 372: 368: 364: 363: 362: 361: 358: 355: 352: 348: 340: 338: 337: 334: 330: 329:. Thank you. 328: 324: 318: 316: 312: 308: 305:Please go to 303: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 280: 272: 265: 250: 247:(assessed as 246: 245: 235: 231: 230: 226: 223:(assessed as 222: 221: 213: 202: 195: 191: 190: 186: 182: 176: 173: 172: 169: 152: 148: 147: 142: 138: 137: 129: 118: 116: 113: 109: 108: 104: 97: 93: 88: 85: 82: 78: 73: 69: 63: 55: 51: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 497: 494: 486: 469: 451: 428: 411: 344: 331: 319: 304: 291: 277: 276: 242: 218: 180: 144: 134: 68:WikiProjects 35: 500:Will Beback 472:Will Beback 454:Will Beback 394:Will Beback 374:Will Beback 354:Will Beback 92:Los Angeles 518:Categories 156:California 146:California 141:U.S. state 87:California 58:Stub-class 300:fair use 284:fair use 28:deletion 417:deleted 341:Sources 183:on the 437:DMacks 429:at all 408:Merger 64:scale. 505:talk 477:talk 459:talk 441:talk 391:·:· 371:·:· 367:WP:V 351:·:· 347:WP:V 292:this 36:keep 34:was 397:·:· 377:·:· 357:·:· 175:Low 143:of 520:: 443:) 369:. 302:. 251:). 227:). 94:/ 90:: 439:( 187:. 70:: 38:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
California
Los Angeles
Southern California
WikiProject icon
California portal
WikiProject California
U.S. state
California
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Greater Los Angeles portal
Los Angeles area task force
Low-importance
Taskforce icon
Southern California task force
Low-importance

Image:Circlelogo.gif
fair use
explanation or rationale
boilerplate fair use template

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.