2414:
click on a link to another term used in the definition that is unfamiliar, note some optional alternatives, link to a main page or see also to expand the available information, possibly check a reference. I might also disappear down a rabbit hole or use the control-F search to find the term more quickly since I know it will be on that page because alphabetical ordering works that way. Is this greatly different from what others do? I would like to know because by knowing I might be able to write better glossary entries. That might improve the encyclopedia. If I do not know what the term is that I need or want, I would not try to use a glossary and would just try various likely looking search strings in the
Knowledge search engine window, or try google in the hope of getting lucky. Enlighten me on how others use the glossary, that may help work out a rational strategy for size and structure. Cheers, · · ·
1106:
bytes. Since that is still too long, we should also split the second largest section into a separate article. The second largest section is S, with 47,000+ bytes, so splitting that off would give us ~386,000 byes. However, there is also the option of doing a split in half. I looked through the section sizes yesterday and did the math, and the most direct split in half would be to split it into A–L and M–Z, each one giving ~246,000 bytes. However, since we have 26 different sections for each letter, there are multiple different ways that this article could be split. I think the most preferable option would be to split based on each section.
1970:
problem is someone's bright idea nine years ago that it's possible to fit a topic that could fill a whole book-length dictionary into a single
Knowledge article. (4) The real fix is to break this up into functional subunits like electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, etc., but that would take a lot of work and a lot of subject-matter expertise rather than a Solomonic baby-splitting. (5) Unless or until we find an editor willing to put that much effort into it, we should try to put the baby back together so that at least we have a baby rather than two half-babies. —
390:
263:
369:
242:
176:
158:
1746:. Now you need to go create churn on all of those pages to re-point them to the correct section. Additionally many intra-article links are also broken because the split was done poorly. Finally, those intra-article links are supposed to immediately jump to the other glossary entry, now they require a page load, and if you then follow another link, it may require yet another page load. This makes the browsing expereince _worse_ not better.
273:
84:
339:
400:
74:
53:
1947:– For the nth time, a glossary isn't "read", and readers don't "load and access" pages, computers do. You take it as axiomatic that any split of a large page makes it "easier to load, read, and access", and you repeat this mantra over and over ad nauseum while rationalizing away (or studiedly refusing to understand) the negative effects of splits, and the hamhanded way you do them. (CIR exhibit 5.)
186:
478:
22:
1614:. Please make sure that any move is done correctly so that legacy of article is maintained including history, page creator, etc. While nobody owns a page, it is important to give all those who volunteered to work on the article the credit they deserve. The same is true for splits. By the way, could someone please check to see if the recent split did that? Thanks.
2059:
No, it would be quite difficult since almost no what set of subtopics you devise, many entries will seemingly belong in more than one. It might be possible to peel off some fraction of entries that are clearly specialized to one field, but overall there will still be a very, very large mass that defy
1765:
The two articles are still quite large themselves, so a merge isn't tenable. If a reader wanted to read all the content of the two articles which amounts to over 400,000 bytes, they would still only need to "jump around" between two articles. This is fewer articles a reader would need to navigate if
2392:
I will agree that splitting makes an in-page search for something not in the page a complete pain, but on the other hand having the page crash while rendering because of its size and number of templates is also inconvenient. Glossaries tend to grow over time. One day they crash. It is theoretically
2117:
To address EEng's second point and LearnMore's reply, the article is actually easier to read due to being shorter. There is also no reason why finding anything would be difficult, considering that people would search for specifically A–L or M–Z to find what word they are looking for. There are tons
1969:
Since my name was called here somewhere in an edit summary, here's my opinion on the whole mess: (1) The glossary is too long. (2) The split is an unhelpful change that makes a bad situation worse, by leaving it in pieces that are both still too long and also significantly less usable. (3) The real
806:
made it one of the best glossaries on
Knowledge. I hope other editors will be inspired to expand the Knowledge glossaries across all topics. Glossaries are one of the most important features of this encyclopedia. They make complex subjects easier to understand. Sometimes the articles on Knowledge
2413:
After reading some of the comments above, I have a question. How do people use this glossary? I would go to a glossary to look up the meaning of a term, I start by knowing what term I want to look up, so I would use the ToC to find the initial letter, scroll down to the entry and read it. I might
1105:
This article is currently at 504,000+ bytes, and it is the largest article on the wiki. I suggest splitting this article, or splitting sections of it into different articles. After looking at the section sizes, the M section appears to be largest, with 71,000+ bytes, which would total to ~433,000
2287:
While some people may think this is a lot of work, it doesn't have to be done in one edit or in 24 hours and can be done gradually. The field of engineering is substantial and has lots of terms which strongly implies that all of it cannot be confined into one single article that doesn't have any
2243:
Please keep in mind that since engineering is an interdisciplinary field the license exam requires knowledge of biology, chemistry, etc. That is why some of those terms should be included. Also, there are already glossaries on
Knowledge for engineering specialties. This one is, and should be,
2102:
Thank you for bringing this up for discussion. I never thought the article needed to be split. I wanted the community to discuss it and I always assume good faith. In my opinion, the definitions of the major concepts of engineering need to be all in one place and in alphabetical order. It is
1877:
These two articles are still larger than the vast majority of
Knowledge articles, so searchability is actually much better here in that narrow example than most other articles. Knowledge readers seeking information about electrons would best find it using the search bar. If they want to find it
1784:
No, normal people do not think about accessing "bytes of information". Computers do that, not humans. How many bytes it takes up is completely irrelevant to a human. A human has a handy tool built into their browser called ctrl+f (or cmd+f) which no longer is possible when the article is split.
2283:
For the first suggestion, while it may condense to only the most important engineering terms to the reader, the inclusive scope may be limited due to the fact that it excludes other less important terms. For the second suggestion, a new article should be made for each category.
2137:
I am an engineering student. I had no problem with the glossary before the split. Further, I like the robust material. It is not watered down. That is good for midterms and final exams. Also, the page views for the glossary were almost twice as high before the split.
908:
Don't belittle other people's contributions. While I grant it is not in the same league as populating the glossary, it is neither mindless tedium nor just repetitive 'cut and paste'. Since my efforts are so unappreciated, you can sort out the remaining glossaries
1901:– The size of the article has nothing to do with its searchability; all pages are equally searchable using ctrl-F. What you've done is split the page into two, so that to search the material you now have to visit two pages and do two searches. Thus this page is
1935:– That's all you have to say about the links you've broken? You have repeatedly shown that you have no idea what to do about them. And I'll note that in an ANI thread on this very topic, in which you came very close to being topic-banned, your please was
2152:
I just took an informal poll in our discussion group. We liked it better before the split. I asked about 48 people. All engineering majors. It just seemed better to navigate before. Doesn't
Knowledge have some sort of arbitration system?
2380:(split in two). It requires a couple of special templates, but makes further splitting simple when necessary. I leave the decision to those who actually edit the article, but will help set up the templates if that is what they want. · · ·
1785:
Additionally the point of a glossary is to also find other entries that are related. Say I want to find any topic related to "electrons", it shows up in multiple entries on both pages. Now I need to search both pages, not just one.
2222:
and so it needs a good prune. And most of the entries seem to have articles and so are perhaps redundant. The glossary should be slimmed down to engineering jargon and words that don't have an article. An appropriate example is
1282:
I don't see any need for sections to be divided, but I fully support the article being divided into two or more articles. I would prefer a split like H-K and L-Z rather than splitting out individual sections into new articles.
2193:
To be honest, I think we should concentrate first on getting the splitting guideline changed. Until then all efforts to stop this kind of nonsense are going to be met with the same relentlessly blithe bludgeoning.
1799:
Byte sizes are an indication of article and content size, especially at those scales. If a reader is searching for "electrons", they use the search bar which on desktop browsers is in the top right of every page.
811:
is a great resource for engineering students who need a broad overview of all the subfields. So again, I want to thank
Wtshymanski for all the hard work. Engineering students around the world are grateful.
2333:
All the users and contributors (i.e., the engineers) think is works better as one article. There is no question that it does. It could be slimmed down, but right now the arguments are all over the place.
2022:
I think it shouldn't be too hard to find a few major topics to separate the entries into, which would be better than an alphabetical split. The two halves together are absolutely too much for one page.
2227:– a dab page because some think there's nothing to say about it. Another option would be to split by discipline instead – civil engineering, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, etc.
1743:
1937:
The simple reason why I didn't resolve those errors myself is that I didn't know how to. If I knew how to, I most certainly would have done so, and I did not anticipate the errors occurring.
807:
become too technical for high school and college students. The glossaries counter that. They also allow students to review an entire subject without having to click on each term. This
2327:"Article officially and boldly split, as there were no objections to my split proposal after a week (automatic consensus). If intending to revert, please discuss first on talk page."
2303:
Are you aware of how much overlap there is between engineering disciplines in the way of terminology, and how many of them one might have to consult to find the term you want? · · ·
1899:
These two articles are still larger than the vast majority of
Knowledge articles, so searchability is actually much better here in that narrow example than most other articles.
1667:
This split makes this article a worse article by causing people to need to jump around in order to view the content clearly. Is anyone else interested in reversing the split?
1915:– Are you truly this dense? We're not talking about a reader looking for general information on electrons. We're talking about a reader who wants to find the word "electron"
1878:
within articles, they can do so in as many articles as they want. Broken links are a different matter. The benefit is to make the content easier to load, read and access per
803:
2057:
1125:
Agreed. I propose splitting by letter, except combining H-K, O with either N or P, Q with either P or R, U with T or V, and X through Z, and also splitting M into two.
1317:
If you split it, make absolutely sure you maintain the page's history including revisions, page creator, etc. Have an administrator or very experienced editor do it.
852:
Please note that I was referring to the other glossary, not this one. However, I am sure engineering students would be thrilled if you could help out on this one. --
940:
I was commenting on my own edits. I've no idea how much work anyone else puts into these things, and didn't you justsay you haven't done a lot to this list yet? --
2440:
140:
130:
2470:
347:
2214:, guidelines should follow actual practice rather than being prescriptive. Anyway, the process for merging the two pages back together is described at
2445:
2373:
2485:
2465:
2455:
2435:
456:
446:
329:
319:
2450:
1749:
As to making the article too long, I think that's irrelevant if it makes the page harder to read/use. It's not even that long in the first place.
106:
1682:
That is not necessarily true. One could simply link to the specific article. Besides, reverting the split would make the page too long again.
2475:
208:
2480:
2460:
2154:
2139:
2127:
1691:
1621:
1504:
1379:
1329:
1306:
1263:
1231:
1166:
1148:
1115:
2218:. I would support this because my impression is that the glossary is bloated with too many terms that are not really engineering such as
1814:
Searching "electrons" in the search bar finds that word throughout
Knowledge. What you've done it make it impossible to make that search
1456:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1010:
I'm a bit tied up for the next couple of days, but I shall try to edit the current entries and populate a few more sometime next week.
2324:
The article was split surreptitiously by someone whose primary goal in
Knowledge is to split articles, using the following rationale:
2245:
1577:
1531:
422:
97:
58:
1523:
1492:
743:
729:
716:
703:
690:
677:
664:
651:
638:
625:
612:
599:
586:
573:
560:
547:
534:
521:
498:
1095:
1742:
Except most every page does not do that. And now wikipedia is full of broken links that no longer link to the specific sections.
1353:
199:
163:
1818:, except by jumping between two pages and doing it twice. The other points raised by Ergzay are precisely the ones I made at
1067:
Thanks to all those who have contributed to this glossary. And thanks to all those who will contribute to it in the future.
1939:
2004:
No, but you urged the split and are defending it in a way that clearly demonstrates your lack of competence in this area.
1658:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1602:
413:
374:
286:
247:
1338:
I encourage any editor to split articles. The page's history is retained automatically if splits are done appropriately.
1254:
We should probably combine U–V with W–Z and combine P with N–O now that I think about it. I will edit the original list.
351:
33:
2118:
of Knowledge pages divided alphabetically, or divided in general, and they have not caused any problems or complaints.
1855:
1819:
1830:
problem, given that you insist on working in an area whose basic issues and concepts your seem unable to comprehend.
2377:
2232:
1447:
2337:
Put it back the way it was before it was "boldly split", a practice that should be outlawed. Take it from there.
2321:
Here's a radical thought: why don't we restore the article to what it was before the split and work from there.
2158:
2143:
2123:
1975:
1929:– Yeah, and wherever you've split articles needlessly you've doubled their work in doing that. (CIR Exhibit 3.)
1687:
1625:
1598:
1500:
1375:
1325:
1302:
1259:
1227:
1162:
1144:
1111:
1526:} as entries. They are of equal long-term significance, and any disparity in page views could be explained by
2028:
1991:
1887:
1805:
1771:
1644:
1488:
1343:
1288:
2279:
Categorise by discipline instead – civil engineering, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, etc.
2249:
2219:
1920:
1581:
1535:
1091:
278:
2418:
2397:
2384:
2342:
2307:
1594:
1495:– Since this list now only covers words from A to L, it would make the most sense to rename it as such.
1457:
945:
879:
39:
2228:
1617:
1541:
874:
It's mostly just mechanical work...save your praise. Mindless tedium, rather like solving sudokus. --
2421:
2400:
2387:
2363:
2346:
2310:
2297:
2253:
2236:
2205:
2188:
2168:
Thanks for the contribution. I'm not aware of the process to mount such a merge of articles. Maybe @
2162:
2147:
2131:
2112:
2081:
2032:
2015:
1995:
1979:
1962:
1891:
1872:
1841:
1809:
1794:
1775:
1758:
1729:
1713:
1695:
1676:
1648:
1629:
1606:
1585:
1576:, which can then be transcluded? They should take a parameter for the "see also" to the other list.
1555:
1508:
1482:
1411:
1397:
1383:
1365:
1347:
1333:
1310:
1297:
Doing L–Z would give ~206,000 bytes, which would be way more than H–K, which has only 19,964 bytes.
1292:
1267:
1249:
1235:
1170:
1152:
1134:
1119:
1076:
1043:
1019:
993:
949:
919:
883:
861:
836:
821:
2330:
The only people that seem to support the split are those who always do this, seemingly in concert.
2119:
2108:
2066:– There it is again, the mantra of "it's too big!" repeated over and over as if that makes it true.
1971:
1739:
1683:
1519:
1496:
1460:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1371:
1321:
1298:
1255:
1223:
1158:
1140:
1107:
1072:
1039:
1015:
989:
915:
857:
832:
817:
1403:
1389:
1357:
1241:
1126:
421:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
207:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2293:
2024:
1987:
1883:
1801:
1781:
1767:
1640:
1470:
1432:
1339:
1284:
89:
2244:
about the broad fundamental terms that also touch briefly on biology, chemistry, physics, etc.
1882:
as they are still very large articles, but not as absurdly large as if they were put together.
1913:
Knowledge readers seeking information about electrons would best find it using the search bar.
1528:
letter frequency § Relative frequencies of the first letters of a word in the English language
1478:
1407:
1393:
1361:
1245:
1130:
1087:
191:
2415:
2394:
2381:
2338:
2304:
2211:
2184:
2042:
1905:
searchable than any other page that hasn't been mindlessly split, as this one has. (This is
1790:
1754:
1672:
1527:
979:
941:
902:
875:
791:
785:
2215:
295:
1927:
If they want to find it within articles, they can do so in as many articles as they want.
389:
368:
262:
241:
2358:
2200:
2174:
2104:
2076:
2010:
1957:
1879:
1867:
1836:
1724:
1708:
1068:
1035:
1029:
1011:
985:
911:
853:
847:
828:
813:
799:
798:. Wtshymanski's brilliant and extensive contributions, along with admirable help from
405:
175:
157:
83:
2429:
2289:
1906:
1827:
1766:
they wanted to read or access over 400,000 bytes of information in most other cases.
1428:
984:
My complete misunderstanding. And I apologise unreservedly if I caused any offence.
338:
1474:
399:
2276:
Slim down the glossary to engineering jargon and words that don't have an article
2180:
2099:
1786:
1750:
1668:
1547:
102:
73:
52:
395:
268:
204:
185:
181:
79:
2038:
shouldn't be too hard to find a few major topics to separate the entries into
1597:. This could probably be withdrawn and completed as an uncontroversial move.
2353:
2224:
2195:
2169:
2071:
2005:
1952:
1862:
1831:
1826:
don't grasp basic stuff like broken links. This is beginning to look like a
1719:
1703:
1986:
EEng, you seem to be under the impression I split this article. I did not.
1941:
Well, here we are two years later and no much has changed. (CIR Exhibit 4.)
1564:. I wonder if it's worth separating the common top and tail into templates
1427:
Hi, I was considering splitting the glossary into halves: (A-M) and (N-Z)
2393:
possible WMF will fix the problem, but I am not holding my breath. · · ·
1639:
This didn't require a discussion, it's the obvious outcome of the split.
1522:, and create a disambiguation page at the base page name with this and
1175:
I did the math, and here are the results (I also combined W with X–Z):
1056:
This is a great glossary. Very helpful. Please add more definitions.
418:
1856:
WT:Article size#Clarification needed for "article splitting activists"
1820:
WT:Article size#Clarification needed for "article splitting activists"
291:
1945:
The benefit is to make the content easier to load, read and access
1854:
I'm going to repeat here a question I've asked over and over at
472:
15:
2064:
The two halves together are absolutely too much for one page
337:
2272:
A few suggestions have been made in response to the split:
2372:
There is another way to split which works quite well for
1919:. This has been explained to you repeatedly (here and at
1909:
Exhibit 1 for a possible topic ban from article splits.)
2045:
1858:, and to which I've received not cognizable answer:
417:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
203:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1320:I also just edited the list to combine L with H–K.
2051:
804:Glossary of electrical and electronics engineering
1860:What was the benefit to the reader of this split?
1222:All in all, this mostly seems like a good split.
827:Er. Not guilty. I have done nothing here - yet!
2179:has advice on how to begin the voting process?
2268:Improving the layout/structure of the glossary
8:
1240:Agreed. I suppose we should get on with it.
1157:And I assume you mean by individual letter.
290:, which collaborates on articles related to
1081:
1615:
1446:The following is a closed discussion of a
495:
484:
363:
236:
152:
47:
21:
19:
2374:Glossary of underwater diving terminology
2044:
1702:"Too long" again? How long is too long?
487:
365:
238:
154:
49:
2063:
2037:
1944:
1936:
1932:
1926:
1912:
1898:
348:not associated with a particular field
7:
1465:The result of the move request was:
1082:Should't this be a Wikibook instead?
411:This article is within the scope of
284:This article is within the scope of
197:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
2441:Top-importance Engineering articles
1933:Broken links are a different matter
1593:: one of the recommended styles at
1388:Alright, I'll finish splitting it.
794:for his extraordinary work on this
38:It is of interest to the following
1573:{{Glossary of engineering bottom}}
14:
2471:Unassessed field Systems articles
1435:) 21:15, 22 September 2021 (BST)
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Engineering
2446:WikiProject Engineering articles
1654:The discussion above is closed.
1354:Draft:Glossary of engineering: M
476:
398:
388:
367:
271:
261:
240:
217:Knowledge:WikiProject Technology
184:
174:
156:
118:Template:WikiProject Engineering
82:
72:
51:
20:
2486:Top-importance science articles
2466:Top-importance Systems articles
2456:WikiProject Technology articles
2436:List-Class Engineering articles
2409:How do people use this glossary
1567:{{Glossary of engineering top}}
451:This article has been rated as
324:This article has been rated as
220:Template:WikiProject Technology
135:This article has been rated as
2451:List-Class Technology articles
1412:23:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
1398:23:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
1384:21:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
1366:14:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
1348:23:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
1334:16:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
1311:16:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
1293:07:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
2364:23:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
2347:22:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
2298:21:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
2254:18:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
1538:) 21:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
1439:Requested move 9 October 2021
1356:, could someone take a look?
1268:23:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
1250:22:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
1236:20:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
1171:20:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
1153:20:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
1135:15:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
1120:15:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
431:Knowledge:WikiProject Science
425:and see a list of open tasks.
304:Knowledge:WikiProject Systems
211:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
2476:WikiProject Systems articles
2237:23:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
2206:13:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
2189:09:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
2163:22:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
2148:21:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
2132:19:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
2113:15:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
2082:17:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
2033:06:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
2016:17:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1996:06:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1980:05:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1963:05:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1892:02:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1873:00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1842:00:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1810:06:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
1795:03:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
1776:21:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
1759:03:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
1730:17:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1714:00:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
1696:18:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
1677:15:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
1649:23:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
1630:16:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1607:02:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1556:04:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
1524:Glossary of engineering: M–Z
1493:Glossary of engineering: A–L
1483:19:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
1077:20:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
499:Glossary of engineering: A–L
434:Template:WikiProject Science
350:. Fields are listed on the
307:Template:WikiProject Systems
2481:List-Class science articles
2461:List-Class Systems articles
1586:22:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
1509:14:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
1034:Thank you very very much.--
2502:
2378:Glossary of nautical terms
1718:No answer, as usual. Huh.
1044:12:49, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
1020:11:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
994:10:27, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
950:20:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
920:13:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
884:21:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
862:14:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
837:14:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
822:13:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
457:project's importance scale
330:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
2422:14:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
2401:12:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
2388:12:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
2376:(split several ways) and
2311:13:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
2288:space for anything else.
1096:03:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
450:
383:
345:
323:
256:
169:
134:
67:
46:
1923:), and is CIR Exhibit 2.
1656:Please do not modify it.
1453:Please do not modify it.
1052:This is a great glossary
2103:better for the reader.
2052:{\displaystyle \wedge }
1489:Glossary of engineering
809:glossary of engineering
796:glossary of engineering
98:WikiProject Engineering
2220:adenosine triphosphate
2053:
1822:, and it appears you
1101:Splitting this article
1086:The title says it. --
342:
279:Systems science portal
200:WikiProject Technology
28:This article is rated
2054:
341:
2043:
121:Engineering articles
1663:Reverting the split
1599:Firefangledfeathers
502:
414:WikiProject Science
287:WikiProject Systems
223:Technology articles
2317:A Radical Proposal
2049:
1592:
1471:User:Onetwothreeip
496:
343:
90:Engineering portal
34:content assessment
2352:I'm behind that.
1632:
1620:comment added by
1590:
1558:
1217:U–Z: 27,489 bytes
1208:Q–R: 18,650 bytes
1205:N–P: 48,326 bytes
1199:H–L: 38,872 bytes
776:
775:
771:
770:
767:
766:
497:Section size for
471:
470:
467:
466:
463:
462:
362:
361:
358:
357:
235:
234:
231:
230:
192:Technology portal
151:
150:
147:
146:
2493:
2058:
2056:
2055:
2050:
1917:in this glossary
1816:in this glossary
1575:
1574:
1569:
1568:
1554:
1552:
1550:
1540:
1455:
1033:
983:
906:
851:
790:I want to thank
789:
746:
503:
485:
480:
479:
473:
439:
438:
437:science articles
435:
432:
429:
408:
403:
402:
392:
385:
384:
379:
371:
364:
346:This article is
312:
311:
310:Systems articles
308:
305:
302:
281:
276:
275:
274:
265:
258:
257:
252:
244:
237:
225:
224:
221:
218:
215:
194:
189:
188:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
2501:
2500:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2426:
2425:
2416:Peter Southwood
2411:
2395:Peter Southwood
2382:Peter Southwood
2319:
2305:Peter Southwood
2270:
2060:categorization.
2041:
2040:
1921:WP:Article size
1665:
1660:
1659:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1451:
1441:
1370:It looks good.
1214:T: 28,318 bytes
1211:S: 47,507 bytes
1202:M: 71,778 bytes
1196:G: 21,008 bytes
1193:F: 25,912 bytes
1190:E: 37,681 bytes
1187:D: 19,225 bytes
1184:C: 47,301 bytes
1181:B: 30,502 bytes
1178:A: 34,056 bytes
1103:
1084:
1065:
1054:
1027:
977:
900:
845:
783:
781:
772:
742:
490:
477:
436:
433:
430:
427:
426:
404:
397:
377:
309:
306:
303:
300:
299:
296:systems science
277:
272:
270:
250:
222:
219:
216:
213:
212:
190:
183:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
2499:
2497:
2489:
2488:
2483:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2463:
2458:
2453:
2448:
2443:
2438:
2428:
2427:
2410:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2390:
2367:
2366:
2318:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2269:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2155:107.77.192.113
2140:107.77.192.113
2135:
2134:
2120:Blubabluba9990
2115:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2061:
2048:
2020:
2019:
2018:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1972:David Eppstein
1950:
1949:
1948:
1942:
1930:
1924:
1910:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1747:
1740:Blubabluba9990
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1684:Blubabluba9990
1664:
1661:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1622:107.77.192.168
1609:
1595:WP:NCSPLITLIST
1559:
1497:Blubabluba9990
1486:
1463:
1462:
1448:requested move
1442:
1440:
1437:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1372:Blubabluba9990
1322:Blubabluba9990
1318:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1299:Blubabluba9990
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1256:Blubabluba9990
1224:Blubabluba9990
1220:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1209:
1206:
1203:
1200:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1179:
1159:Blubabluba9990
1141:Blubabluba9990
1108:Blubabluba9990
1102:
1099:
1083:
1080:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1009:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
963:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
867:
866:
865:
864:
840:
839:
780:
777:
774:
773:
769:
768:
765:
764:
761:
758:
754:
753:
750:
747:
739:
738:
735:
732:
726:
725:
722:
719:
713:
712:
709:
706:
700:
699:
696:
693:
687:
686:
683:
680:
674:
673:
670:
667:
661:
660:
657:
654:
648:
647:
644:
641:
635:
634:
631:
628:
622:
621:
618:
615:
609:
608:
605:
602:
596:
595:
592:
589:
583:
582:
579:
576:
570:
569:
566:
563:
557:
556:
553:
550:
544:
543:
540:
537:
531:
530:
527:
524:
518:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
501:(18 sections)
492:
491:
488:
483:
481:
469:
468:
465:
464:
461:
460:
453:Top-importance
449:
443:
442:
440:
423:the discussion
410:
409:
406:Science portal
393:
381:
380:
378:Top‑importance
372:
360:
359:
356:
355:
344:
334:
333:
326:Top-importance
322:
316:
315:
313:
283:
282:
266:
254:
253:
251:Top‑importance
245:
233:
232:
229:
228:
226:
209:the discussion
196:
195:
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Top-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Top‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2498:
2487:
2484:
2482:
2479:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2464:
2462:
2459:
2457:
2454:
2452:
2449:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2439:
2437:
2434:
2433:
2431:
2424:
2423:
2419:
2417:
2408:
2402:
2398:
2396:
2391:
2389:
2385:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2365:
2362:
2361:
2357:
2356:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2335:
2331:
2328:
2325:
2322:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2306:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2285:
2278:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2267:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2204:
2203:
2199:
2198:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2150:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2116:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2101:
2097:
2096:
2083:
2080:
2079:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2065:
2062:
2046:
2039:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2025:Onetwothreeip
2021:
2017:
2014:
2013:
2009:
2008:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1988:Onetwothreeip
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1961:
1960:
1956:
1955:
1951:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1934:
1931:
1928:
1925:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1911:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1889:
1885:
1884:Onetwothreeip
1881:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1871:
1870:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1852:
1843:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1834:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1802:Onetwothreeip
1798:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1783:
1782:Onetwothreeip
1779:
1778:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1768:Onetwothreeip
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1731:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1722:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1712:
1711:
1707:
1706:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1662:
1657:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1641:Onetwothreeip
1638:
1637:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1551:
1543:
1542:WP:SOCKSTRIKE
1539:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1461:
1459:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1443:
1438:
1436:
1434:
1430:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1340:Onetwothreeip
1337:
1336:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:Onetwothreeip
1281:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1186:
1183:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1100:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1051:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
995:
991:
987:
981:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
951:
947:
943:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
921:
917:
913:
910:
904:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
885:
881:
877:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
863:
859:
855:
849:
844:
843:
842:
841:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
824:
823:
819:
815:
810:
805:
801:
797:
793:
787:
778:
762:
759:
756:
755:
751:
748:
745:
741:
740:
736:
733:
731:
728:
727:
723:
720:
718:
715:
714:
710:
707:
705:
702:
701:
697:
694:
692:
689:
688:
684:
681:
679:
676:
675:
671:
668:
666:
663:
662:
658:
655:
653:
650:
649:
645:
642:
640:
637:
636:
632:
629:
627:
624:
623:
619:
616:
614:
611:
610:
606:
603:
601:
598:
597:
593:
590:
588:
585:
584:
580:
577:
575:
572:
571:
567:
564:
562:
559:
558:
554:
551:
549:
546:
545:
541:
538:
536:
533:
532:
528:
525:
523:
520:
519:
513:
508:
505:
504:
500:
494:
493:
489:Section sizes
486:
482:
475:
474:
458:
454:
448:
445:
444:
441:
424:
420:
416:
415:
407:
401:
396:
394:
391:
387:
386:
382:
376:
373:
370:
366:
353:
352:template page
349:
340:
336:
335:
331:
327:
321:
318:
317:
314:
297:
293:
289:
288:
280:
269:
267:
264:
260:
259:
255:
249:
246:
243:
239:
227:
210:
206:
202:
201:
193:
187:
182:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
2412:
2359:
2354:
2336:
2332:
2329:
2326:
2323:
2320:
2286:
2282:
2271:
2246:107.77.194.5
2201:
2196:
2175:
2170:
2151:
2136:
2077:
2072:
2011:
2006:
1958:
1953:
1916:
1902:
1868:
1863:
1859:
1837:
1832:
1823:
1815:
1725:
1720:
1709:
1704:
1666:
1655:
1616:— Preceding
1611:
1578:85.67.32.244
1561:
1532:85.67.32.244
1520:WP:NOPRIMARY
1515:
1514:
1487:
1466:
1464:
1452:
1445:
1426:
1104:
1088:Jorge Stolfi
1085:
1066:
1058:
1055:
1008:
962:
907:
808:
795:
782:
506:Section name
452:
412:
325:
285:
198:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
2339:VarmtheHawk
1458:move review
1063:More thanks
980:Wtshymanski
942:Wtshymanski
903:Wtshymanski
876:Wtshymanski
792:Wtshymanski
786:Wtshymanski
744:Works cited
112:Engineering
103:engineering
59:Engineering
2430:Categories
1553:(she/they)
1467:page moved
1352:Just made
730:References
214:Technology
205:technology
164:Technology
30:List-class
2225:ingenuity
2212:WP:NOTLAW
2105:LearnMore
1069:LearnMore
1036:LearnMore
1030:DocFergus
1012:DocFergus
986:DocFergus
912:DocFergus
909:yourself.
854:LearnMore
848:DocFergus
829:DocFergus
814:LearnMore
802:, to the
800:DocFergus
2290:zsteve21
2216:WP:MERGE
2128:contribs
1744:See here
1692:contribs
1618:unsigned
1505:contribs
1429:zsteve21
1380:contribs
1330:contribs
1307:contribs
1264:contribs
1232:contribs
1167:contribs
1149:contribs
1116:contribs
763:270,090
704:See also
1880:WP:SIZE
1612:Comment
1591:Support
1562:Comment
1516:Support
1475:wbm1058
1404:Ji11720
1390:Ji11720
1358:Ji11720
1242:Ji11720
1127:Ji11720
760:270,090
685:19,002
633:10,157
620:22,019
607:27,121
594:38,757
581:20,203
568:48,910
555:31,665
542:36,328
514:Section
455:on the
428:Science
419:Science
375:Science
328:on the
301:Systems
292:systems
248:Systems
139:on the
2229:Andrew
2181:Ergzay
2100:Ergzay
1907:WP:CIR
1828:WP:CIR
1787:Ergzay
1751:Ergzay
1669:Ergzay
1549:Tamzin
1402:Done!
779:Thanks
752:4,014
737:4,062
682:19,002
672:3,010
659:3,255
646:3,972
630:10,157
617:22,019
604:27,121
591:38,757
578:20,203
565:48,910
552:31,665
539:36,328
516:total
36:scale.
1824:still
1473:. –
757:Total
749:4,014
717:Notes
669:3,010
656:3,255
643:3,972
522:(Top)
511:count
2343:talk
2294:talk
2250:talk
2233:talk
2210:Per
2185:talk
2159:talk
2144:talk
2124:talk
2109:talk
2029:talk
1992:talk
1976:talk
1903:less
1888:talk
1806:talk
1791:talk
1772:talk
1755:talk
1688:talk
1673:talk
1645:talk
1626:talk
1603:talk
1582:talk
1570:and
1536:talk
1518:per
1501:talk
1479:talk
1433:talk
1408:talk
1394:talk
1376:talk
1362:talk
1344:talk
1326:talk
1303:talk
1289:talk
1260:talk
1246:talk
1228:talk
1163:talk
1145:talk
1139:Ok.
1131:talk
1112:talk
1092:talk
1073:talk
1040:talk
1016:talk
990:talk
946:talk
916:talk
880:talk
858:talk
833:talk
818:talk
724:143
711:917
529:515
509:Byte
294:and
2360:Eng
2231:🐉(
2202:Eng
2176:Eng
2126:) (
2078:Eng
2012:Eng
1959:Eng
1869:Eng
1838:Eng
1726:Eng
1710:Eng
1690:) (
1546:--
1503:) (
1469:by
1378:) (
1328:) (
1305:) (
1262:) (
1230:) (
1165:) (
1147:) (
1114:) (
721:143
708:917
698:54
691:M–Z
526:515
447:Top
320:Top
131:Top
2432::
2420::
2399::
2386::
2345:)
2309::
2296:)
2252:)
2235:)
2187:)
2161:)
2146:)
2130:)
2111:)
2047:∧
2031:)
1994:)
1978:)
1890:)
1808:)
1793:)
1774:)
1757:)
1694:)
1675:)
1647:)
1628:)
1605:)
1584:)
1530:.
1507:)
1491:→
1481:)
1450:.
1410:)
1396:)
1382:)
1364:)
1346:)
1332:)
1309:)
1291:)
1266:)
1248:)
1234:)
1169:)
1151:)
1133:)
1118:)
1094:)
1075:)
1042:)
1018:)
992:)
948:)
918:)
882:)
860:)
835:)
820:)
812:--
734:48
695:54
2355:E
2341:(
2292:(
2248:(
2197:E
2183:(
2171:E
2157:(
2142:(
2122:(
2107:(
2098:@
2073:E
2027:(
2007:E
1990:(
1974:(
1954:E
1886:(
1864:E
1833:E
1804:(
1789:(
1780:@
1770:(
1753:(
1738:@
1721:E
1705:E
1686:(
1671:(
1643:(
1624:(
1601:(
1580:(
1534:(
1499:(
1477:(
1431:(
1406:(
1392:(
1374:(
1360:(
1342:(
1324:(
1301:(
1287:(
1258:(
1244:(
1226:(
1161:(
1143:(
1129:(
1110:(
1090:(
1071:(
1038:(
1032::
1028:@
1014:(
988:(
982::
978:@
944:(
914:(
905::
901:@
878:(
856:(
850::
846:@
831:(
816:(
788::
784:@
678:L
665:K
652:J
639:I
626:H
613:G
600:F
587:E
574:D
561:C
548:B
535:A
459:.
354:.
332:.
298:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
