333:
301:
21:
272:
317:
164:
54:
373:
430:
409:
220:
600:
234:
195:
650:
Ran out of time before coming even close to finishing this article. Intend to revisit it soon, but there is simply too much material to go into such detail in a single article. My plan is, therefore, to spin out the history of the regiment in WWI to a separate article, and summarise that period in
805:
The MOS does say a link may be repeated in a table so I think it may be acceptable here given the list is a pseudo-table. The list is helpful for the reader since it centralises the VC recipients in one place and they don't have to review all the campaign history to find the soldiers.
827:
On a straight headcount the !vote is 4:2 against the duplicate links, a position further strengthened by the the MOS, which is also against them, so I'm removing them. Please do not add them back in without seeking consensus for it. Thanks all.
324:
209:
382:
308:
205:
96:
115:
35:
861:
906:
856:
916:
470:
340:
213:
387:
134:
726:
What's the consensus on duplicate linking of the
Victoria Cross recipients in this article? They are first linked in the main narrative where their VC-winning actions are described.
911:
891:
881:
886:
876:
60:
246:
480:
744:
in the list of recipients that appears at the end of the article. My take is that as a
Featured Article this article should comply with MOS, and specifically
871:
921:
446:
901:
556:
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add
332:
667:
896:
241:
200:
866:
500:
437:
414:
250:
851:
737:
521:
175:
30:
513:
541:
163:
20:
300:
245:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
768:
53:
632:
612:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
181:
40:
564:
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
731:
590:
796:
782:
691:
445:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
833:
753:
705:
677:
656:
613:
764:
551:
44:
628:
620:
811:
727:
559:
442:
569:
512:
Please join our project to upgrade
Gloucestershire-related articles to featured status.
792:
778:
687:
316:
619:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
271:
845:
829:
749:
701:
673:
652:
837:
815:
800:
786:
772:
757:
709:
695:
681:
660:
640:
526:
745:
807:
372:
429:
408:
607:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
672:
Update: content-wise I think this article is pretty much there now.
233:
194:
219:
157:
575:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
371:
331:
315:
299:
862:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
540:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
907:
Successful requests for military history A-Class review
741:
545:
127:
108:
89:
857:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
570:
http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/028Glos.htm
917:
441:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
354:
282:
59:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as
748:, which says not to duplicate links in this way.
912:FA-Class WikiProject Gloucestershire articles
892:European military history task force articles
8:
882:British military history task force articles
43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
39:as one of the best articles produced by the
33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
887:FA-Class European military history articles
877:FA-Class British military history articles
686:Looks good to me. Well done! Best wishes.
403:
351:
279:
189:
68:
15:
239:This article is within the scope of the
161:
668:Gloucestershire Regiment in World War I
405:
191:
259:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
249:. To use this banner, please see the
587:to let others know (documentation at
455:Knowledge:WikiProject Gloucestershire
262:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
461:WikiProject Gloucestershire articles
458:Template:WikiProject Gloucestershire
435:This article is within the scope of
325:European military history task force
309:British military history task force
180:It is of interest to the following
872:FA-Class military history articles
14:
922:WikiProject Gloucestershire pages
544:. Please take a moment to review
598:
428:
407:
270:
232:
218:
193:
162:
52:
19:
902:World War I task force articles
475:This article has been rated as
742:linking them for a second time
568:Attempted to fix sourcing for
499:Help improve our long-awaited
1:
897:FA-Class World War I articles
527:16:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
449:and see a list of open tasks.
867:Old requests for peer review
710:19:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
696:19:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
682:19:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
242:Military history WikiProject
852:Knowledge featured articles
661:09:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
646:Development of this article
438:WikiProject Gloucestershire
938:
838:18:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
816:23:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
801:07:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
641:06:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
562:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
537:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
481:project's importance scale
116:Featured article candidate
97:WikiProject A-class review
787:17:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
773:15:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
758:15:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
474:
423:
379:
350:
339:
323:
307:
278:
265:military history articles
227:
188:
148:
71:
67:
542:Gloucestershire Regiment
61:Today's featured article
27:Gloucestershire Regiment
533:External links modified
355:Additional information:
283:Associated task forces:
763:We only need one link.
376:
341:World War I task force
336:
320:
304:
170:This article is rated
375:
335:
319:
303:
579:parameter below to
41:Knowledge community
377:
337:
321:
305:
247:list of open tasks
176:content assessment
72:Article milestones
63:on April 22, 2018.
639:
495:
494:
491:
490:
487:
486:
402:
401:
398:
397:
394:
393:
346:
345:
251:full instructions
156:
155:
144:
143:
90:December 19, 2017
929:
635:
634:Talk to my owner
630:
605:
602:
601:
594:
563:
555:
524:
518:
517:
463:
462:
459:
456:
453:
432:
425:
424:
419:
411:
404:
362:
352:
290:
280:
274:
267:
266:
263:
260:
257:
256:Military history
236:
229:
228:
223:
222:
221:
216:
201:Military history
197:
190:
173:
167:
166:
158:
151:Featured article
149:Current status:
130:
128:December 2, 2017
111:
109:January 15, 2018
92:
69:
56:
31:featured article
23:
16:
937:
936:
932:
931:
930:
928:
927:
926:
842:
841:
724:
722:Duplicate links
648:
638:
633:
603:
599:
588:
557:
549:
535:
530:
522:
515:
514:
510:
505:
477:High-importance
460:
457:
454:
452:Gloucestershire
451:
450:
443:Gloucestershire
418:High‑importance
417:
415:Gloucestershire
360:
288:
264:
261:
258:
255:
254:
217:
203:
174:on Knowledge's
171:
126:
107:
88:
12:
11:
5:
935:
933:
925:
924:
919:
914:
909:
904:
899:
894:
889:
884:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
844:
843:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
723:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
647:
644:
631:
625:
624:
617:
573:
572:
548:. You may add
534:
531:
509:
506:
504:
497:
496:
493:
492:
489:
488:
485:
484:
473:
467:
466:
464:
447:the discussion
433:
421:
420:
412:
400:
399:
396:
395:
392:
391:
388:A-Class review
378:
368:
367:
365:
363:
357:
356:
348:
347:
344:
343:
338:
328:
327:
322:
312:
311:
306:
296:
295:
293:
291:
285:
284:
276:
275:
268:
237:
225:
224:
198:
186:
185:
179:
168:
154:
153:
146:
145:
142:
141:
138:
131:
123:
122:
119:
112:
104:
103:
100:
93:
85:
84:
81:
78:
74:
73:
65:
64:
57:
49:
48:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
934:
923:
920:
918:
915:
913:
910:
908:
905:
903:
900:
898:
895:
893:
890:
888:
885:
883:
880:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
849:
847:
840:
839:
835:
831:
817:
813:
809:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
784:
780:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:
760:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
736:
733:
729:
721:
711:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
679:
675:
671:
670:
669:
665:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
645:
643:
642:
636:
629:
622:
618:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
596:
592:
586:
582:
578:
571:
567:
566:
565:
561:
553:
547:
543:
538:
532:
529:
528:
525:
519:
507:
502:
498:
482:
478:
472:
469:
468:
465:
448:
444:
440:
439:
434:
431:
427:
426:
422:
416:
413:
410:
406:
389:
385:
384:
380:This article
374:
370:
369:
366:
364:
359:
358:
353:
349:
342:
334:
330:
329:
326:
318:
314:
313:
310:
302:
298:
297:
294:
292:
287:
286:
281:
277:
273:
269:
252:
248:
244:
243:
238:
235:
231:
230:
226:
215:
211:
207:
202:
199:
196:
192:
187:
183:
177:
169:
165:
160:
159:
152:
147:
139:
137:
136:
132:
129:
125:
124:
120:
118:
117:
113:
110:
106:
105:
101:
99:
98:
94:
91:
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
75:
70:
66:
62:
58:
55:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
826:
765:Slatersteven
734:
725:
649:
626:
606:
597:
584:
580:
576:
574:
539:
536:
511:
476:
436:
381:
240:
182:WikiProjects
150:
133:
114:
95:
45:please do so
34:
26:
746:MOS:DUPLINK
591:Sourcecheck
501:Wikiproject
214:World War I
135:Peer review
846:Categories
791:One only.
777:One only.
728:TenthEagle
651:this one.
383:has passed
36:identified
793:Mztourist
779:Keith-264
740:) is now
688:Dormskirk
621:this tool
614:this tool
830:Factotem
750:Factotem
738:contribs
702:FactotEm
674:FactotEm
653:FactotEm
627:Cheers.—
552:cbignore
508:Untitled
210:European
172:FA-class
140:Reviewed
121:Promoted
102:Approved
700:Thx :)
637::Online
577:checked
546:my edit
479:on the
206:British
80:Process
585:failed
560:nobots
178:scale.
83:Result
808:Zawed
516:Mike
29:is a
834:talk
812:talk
797:talk
783:talk
769:talk
754:talk
732:talk
706:talk
692:talk
678:talk
666:See
657:talk
581:true
523:talk
471:High
77:Date
595:).
583:or
386:an
848::
836:)
814:)
799:)
785:)
771:)
756:)
708:)
694:)
680:)
659:)
593:}}
589:{{
558:{{
554:}}
550:{{
361:/
289:/
212:/
208:/
204::
832:(
810:(
795:(
781:(
767:(
752:(
735:·
730:(
704:(
690:(
676:(
655:(
623:.
616:.
604:Y
520:|
503:!
483:.
390:.
253:.
184::
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
