812:
588:
567:
918:- It is potentially misleading to quote ammunition capacity without quoting other figures like rate of fire and weight of ammunition. The Gsh-301 is said to have considerably less dispersion and more effective ammunition. It also has a more effective range finding/targeting system than contemporary NATO fighters had. I have a quote from one of the designers who states that he would have given the weapon half its current ammunition supply (ie. only 75 rounds) if he'd known it would be as effective as it is. I'll post references when the book with this quote turns up.--
309:
539:
1086:
a single barreled revolver cannon. If for some reason it does have a particularly short barrel life, it is more likely due to something like barrel metallurgy or using a very high-pressure cartridge. The article ought to explain WHY a Gsh-301 has a "very low" barrel life expectancy as opposed to a revolver cannon like the ADEN, DEFA, or BK27. Those ought to actually have even shorter barrel lives, with their very high rate of fire out of a single barrel.
293:
598:
792:
703:
672:
325:
277:
354:
33:
444:
146:
261:
378:
713:
516:
505:
388:
218:
207:
104:
64:
494:
483:
472:
196:
185:
174:
1044:
911:
it seems like it was added by someone wishing to specifically criticise the GSh-30-1 and support a pro-US arms position. I do not see what place it has in this article without proper means of comparison and a more thorough explanation of the differences in philosophy for aircraft mounted auto-cannon's.
1085:
First, I notice that the article still appears to suggest that for some reason the fact that the Gsh-301 is recoil operated reduces its barrel life below that of both
Gatling and revolver cannons. I still don't see how a single barrel, recoil operated cannon should inherently have a shorter life than
1024:
are still written in the hyphenated style. I'd think it was more important for the article titles to be consistent with each other. Anyway, isn't the most commonly used name given preference over the most accurate name anyway? I don't know all the Wiki policies, but I remember something like that. If
1089:
Anyway, I've brought that up already. What I really came here to say is that the preview tag for the article is wrong. When you turn on preview settings, it shows a little blurb and a photograph of of the page when you hover over a link on
Knowledge (XXG). I notice the blurb for this page says that
1070:
I don't like the suggestion here that it has a shorter barrel life than a revolver or
Gatling cannon. A Gatling, yes, since it divides its fire between multiple barrels which prolongs barrel life by lowering the rate of fire per barrel, but not a revolver cannon. It has a shorter barrel life than a
910:
Not sure why there is a comment in there stating "It is perhaps important to note that US aircraft may come with up to 940 rounds" given that there is no information on the amount of ammunition carried with a GSh-30-1 in this article. Not only does it not actually give any measure of comparison but
866:
A little bit correction there. The trigger system is electrically-powered, but the gun itself is operating on recoil-operation principle. Even the official manufacturer website states that. But it is true that this gun is not gas-operated. Perhaps it is mistaken with the double-barreled Gsh-30K?
893:
Um... this gun is not like the Vulcan except for the fact that they are both aircraft mounted. It's closest mechanical relatives would be either the
Oerlikon 35mm cannon (both are single barrel and high rate of fire) or the GAU-8 or GAU-13 30mm Gatling cannons (both are aircraft mounted and of
1090:"The Gsh-301 is a 30mm Gatling-type autocannon...", which is totally wrong. A Gatling type cannon has multiple barrels and is generally externally powered. But I have no clue how one changes these preview tags, so I can't fix it. Hopefully someone who knows how will fix this? Thanks.
1045:
https://books.google.com/books?id=Kt2ZaOilGXIC&pg=PA247&lpg=PA247&dq=%22GSh-30-1%22&source=bl&ots=vREVhQ-II1&sig=746iSb8hrMRe8dDUkupsXAn-n18&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiYtP2RvPzcAhUD3YMKHTv2B7w4HhDoATAIegQIAhAB#v=onepage&q=%22GSh-30-1%22&f=false
821:
686:
316:
284:
86:
78:
1025:
the majority of people reading
Knowledge (XXG) have only ever seen it written "GSh-30-1", then that's what they'll be looking for. By all means, include the info in the article, but I think the title should have stayed as "30-1", for consistency,
801:
682:
844:
This is not a gas-operated gun. It's mechanisms all electrical powered. Even the shell powder charge burn by ignition of electrical powered detonator. Only misfires been cleared by unique mechanism described in current article.
1143:
1123:
268:
74:
1148:
1128:
1218:
1213:
931:- However, I'll have to disagree with the idea that these weapons aren't comparable: They were designed for use in equivalent roles and represent (along with the DEFA) the leading weapons of their time.--
332:
300:
90:
82:
1067:" it uses a short recoil action instead of a revolver cannon or Gatling gun mechinism. This results in a reduced rate of fire, and very short barrel life, but lower weight and bulk."
159:
116:
1208:
1047:, and others) use GSh-30-1. This change appears to have been made off of unsourced information. I'm also concerned that the Weaponsystem.net source may not be reliable.
654:
457:
443:
145:
1113:
811:
1118:
1108:
1035:
There does not appear to be any source that states that the name of this weapon is "offically" the GSh-301, but rather most sources (including the
Sputnik link,
1188:
1040:
644:
1193:
1183:
782:
620:
111:
69:
1203:
772:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1153:
1133:
1158:
1138:
1071:
Gatling, a lower rate of fire than either type, but with the benefit of being less bulky and heavy. Perhaps I will change it to reflect that.
852:
120:
611:
572:
1223:
1198:
997:
874:
748:
895:
1036:
418:
548:
400:
364:
359:
587:
566:
744:
726:
677:
44:
1041:
https://theaviationist.com/2016/09/18/video-of-live-fire-tests-of-the-russian-t-50-stealth-fighters-30-mm-gun-appears-online/
405:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
1021:
987:
856:
619:(USSR) on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
406:
1001:
878:
731:
50:
32:
899:
308:
115:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
993:
870:
848:
1011:
936:
923:
1052:
1007:
932:
919:
962:
1037:
https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/watch-and-hear-the-su-30sm-flankers-hard-hitting-30mm-c-1734478366
538:
1048:
603:
1091:
1072:
1026:
412:
17:
292:
958:
954:
393:
1094:
1075:
1056:
1029:
1015:
966:
940:
927:
903:
882:
860:
791:
1102:
718:
616:
702:
671:
377:
353:
1020:
Is that unique to this gun only? Because all of the other articles, such as the
324:
276:
708:
593:
383:
260:
735:
743:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
103:
63:
1006:
Definitely, someone will need to change the redirects as well --
26:
1144:
Start-Class
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
1124:
Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
1149:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
1129:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
810:
790:
537:
442:
323:
307:
291:
275:
259:
144:
1219:
Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
1214:
Start-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
822:
the
Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force
615:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
455:
This article has been checked against the following
157:
This article has been checked against the following
802:
the technology and engineering in Russia task force
454:
317:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
285:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
242:
156:
8:
129:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
30:
1209:Low-importance Start-Class Russia articles
666:
561:
451:
348:
239:
153:
58:
982:the actual Russian designation is GSh-301
629:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Soviet Union
399:This article is within the scope of the
109:This article is within the scope of the
668:
563:
350:
60:
1114:Start-Class military aviation articles
417:. To use this banner, please see the
119:. To use this banner, please see the
1119:Military aviation task force articles
1109:Start-Class military history articles
132:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
1189:Low-importance Soviet Union articles
724:This article is within the scope of
609:This article is within the scope of
427:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Aviation
986:Shouldn't this article be moved to
617:Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
49:It is of interest to the following
757:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Russia
25:
1194:WikiProject Soviet Union articles
1184:Start-Class Soviet Union articles
632:Template:WikiProject Soviet Union
711:
701:
670:
596:
586:
565:
514:
503:
492:
481:
470:
386:
376:
352:
216:
205:
194:
183:
172:
102:
62:
31:
777:This article has been rated as
649:This article has been rated as
1204:Low-importance Russia articles
1004:) 04:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
957:but I have no reference to it.
953:I believe that quote was from
1:
1179:WikiProject Aviation articles
1174:WikiProject Aircraft articles
1169:Start-Class aircraft articles
1164:Start-Class aviation articles
1154:Start-Class Cold War articles
1134:Start-Class weaponry articles
1016:21:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
941:21:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
928:21:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
819:This article is supported by
799:This article is supported by
623:and see a list of open tasks.
546:This article is supported by
430:Template:WikiProject Aviation
18:Talk:Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-301
1159:Cold War task force articles
1139:Weaponry task force articles
967:09:38, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
883:22:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
683:Technology & engineering
269:Military aviation task force
112:Military history WikiProject
1224:WikiProject Russia articles
1199:Start-Class Russia articles
1095:20:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
1076:22:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
1057:20:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
1030:22:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
760:Template:WikiProject Russia
1240:
783:project's importance scale
655:project's importance scale
475:Referencing and citation:
177:Referencing and citation:
1022:Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-2
904:19:39, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
861:22:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
818:
798:
776:
734:dedicated to coverage of
696:
648:
581:
545:
371:
331:
315:
299:
283:
267:
238:
135:military history articles
97:
57:
988:Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-301
612:WikiProject Soviet Union
747:, or contribute to the
486:Coverage and accuracy:
243:Associated task forces:
188:Coverage and accuracy:
815:
795:
542:
519:Supporting materials:
447:
328:
312:
296:
280:
264:
221:Supporting materials:
149:
39:This article is rated
814:
794:
635:Soviet Union articles
541:
446:
327:
311:
295:
279:
263:
148:
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
738:on Knowledge (XXG).
549:the aircraft project
402:Aviation WikiProject
87:Russian & Soviet
1081:Article preview tag
604:Soviet Union portal
508:Grammar and style:
461:for B-class status:
335:(c. 1945 – c. 1989)
333:Cold War task force
301:Weaponry task force
210:Grammar and style:
163:for B-class status:
816:
796:
749:project discussion
727:WikiProject Russia
543:
448:
329:
313:
297:
281:
265:
150:
117:list of open tasks
45:content assessment
996:comment added by
873:comment added by
851:comment added by
837:
836:
833:
832:
829:
828:
665:
664:
661:
660:
560:
559:
556:
555:
532:
531:
499:criterion not met
488:criterion not met
477:criterion not met
433:aviation articles
419:full instructions
347:
346:
343:
342:
339:
338:
234:
233:
201:criterion not met
190:criterion not met
179:criterion not met
121:full instructions
16:(Redirected from
1231:
1005:
885:
863:
765:
764:
761:
758:
755:
721:
716:
715:
714:
705:
698:
697:
692:
689:
674:
667:
637:
636:
633:
630:
627:
606:
601:
600:
599:
590:
583:
582:
577:
569:
562:
522:
518:
517:
511:
507:
506:
500:
496:
495:
489:
485:
484:
478:
474:
473:
452:
435:
434:
431:
428:
425:
396:
391:
390:
389:
380:
373:
372:
367:
356:
349:
250:
240:
224:
220:
219:
213:
209:
208:
202:
198:
197:
191:
187:
186:
180:
176:
175:
154:
137:
136:
133:
130:
127:
126:Military history
106:
99:
98:
93:
70:Military history
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1099:
1098:
1083:
1065:
991:
979:
955:Mikhail Simonov
891:
868:
853:217.132.133.105
846:
842:
763:Russia articles
762:
759:
756:
753:
752:
741:To participate:
717:
712:
710:
690:
680:
634:
631:
628:
625:
624:
602:
597:
595:
575:
520:
515:
509:
504:
498:
493:
487:
482:
476:
471:
432:
429:
426:
423:
422:
394:Aviation portal
392:
387:
385:
362:
248:
222:
217:
211:
206:
200:
195:
189:
184:
178:
173:
134:
131:
128:
125:
124:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1237:
1235:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1101:
1100:
1082:
1079:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1059:
998:74.100.178.116
984:
983:
978:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
946:
945:
944:
943:
930:
913:
912:
890:
887:
875:180.254.88.152
841:
838:
835:
834:
831:
830:
827:
826:
817:
807:
806:
797:
787:
786:
779:Low-importance
775:
769:
768:
766:
739:
723:
722:
706:
694:
693:
691:Low‑importance
675:
663:
662:
659:
658:
651:Low-importance
647:
641:
640:
638:
621:the discussion
608:
607:
591:
579:
578:
576:Low‑importance
570:
558:
557:
554:
553:
544:
534:
533:
530:
529:
527:
525:
524:
523:
512:
501:
490:
479:
465:
464:
462:
449:
439:
438:
436:
398:
397:
381:
369:
368:
357:
345:
344:
341:
340:
337:
336:
330:
320:
319:
314:
304:
303:
298:
288:
287:
282:
272:
271:
266:
256:
255:
253:
251:
245:
244:
236:
235:
232:
231:
229:
227:
226:
225:
214:
203:
192:
181:
167:
166:
164:
151:
141:
140:
138:
107:
95:
94:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1236:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1104:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1087:
1080:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1068:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1003:
999:
995:
989:
981:
980:
976:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
942:
938:
934:
929:
925:
921:
917:
916:
915:
914:
909:
908:
907:
905:
901:
897:
896:137.53.85.122
888:
886:
884:
880:
876:
872:
864:
862:
858:
854:
850:
839:
824:
823:
813:
809:
808:
804:
803:
793:
789:
788:
784:
780:
774:
771:
770:
767:
750:
746:
742:
737:
733:
729:
728:
720:
719:Russia portal
709:
707:
704:
700:
699:
695:
688:
684:
679:
676:
673:
669:
656:
652:
646:
643:
642:
639:
622:
618:
614:
613:
605:
594:
592:
589:
585:
584:
580:
574:
571:
568:
564:
551:
550:
540:
536:
535:
528:
526:
521:criterion met
513:
510:criterion met
502:
491:
480:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
460:
459:
453:
450:
445:
441:
440:
437:
420:
416:
415:
410:
409:
404:
403:
395:
384:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
366:
361:
358:
355:
351:
334:
326:
322:
321:
318:
310:
306:
305:
302:
294:
290:
289:
286:
278:
274:
273:
270:
262:
258:
257:
254:
252:
247:
246:
241:
237:
230:
228:
223:criterion met
215:
212:criterion met
204:
193:
182:
171:
170:
169:
168:
165:
162:
161:
155:
152:
147:
143:
142:
139:
122:
118:
114:
113:
108:
105:
101:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
1088:
1084:
1069:
1066:
1019:
1008:Hrimpurstala
985:
933:Hrimpurstala
920:Hrimpurstala
892:
869:— Preceding
865:
847:— Preceding
843:
820:
800:
778:
745:project page
740:
725:
650:
626:Soviet Union
610:
573:Soviet Union
547:
456:
413:
407:
401:
158:
110:
51:WikiProjects
1063:Barrel life
992:—Preceding
977:designation
732:WikiProject
497:Structure:
414:task forces
199:Structure:
41:Start-class
1103:Categories
959:Flanker235
408:open tasks
79:Technology
1049:Garuda28
994:unsigned
889:Old talk
871:unsigned
849:unsigned
687:Military
458:criteria
424:Aviation
365:Aircraft
360:Aviation
160:criteria
91:Cold War
83:Weaponry
75:Aviation
1092:.45Colt
1073:.45Colt
1027:.45Colt
990:then?
894:30mm).
840:Mistake
781:on the
653:on the
754:Russia
736:Russia
678:Russia
47:scale.
906:Alex
1053:talk
1012:talk
1002:talk
963:talk
937:talk
924:talk
900:talk
879:talk
857:talk
730:, a
411:and
773:Low
645:Low
1105::
1055:)
1043:,
1039:,
1014:)
965:)
939:)
926:)
902:)
881:)
859:)
685:/
681::
363::
249:/
89:/
85:/
81:/
77:/
73::
1051:(
1010:(
1000:(
961:(
935:(
922:(
898:(
877:(
855:(
825:.
805:.
785:.
751:.
657:.
552:.
421:.
123:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
