51:, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. The article cites a number of sources, and so the content is verifiable. Still it seems to me that this historical programming language never grew to more than a research topic of a small group of scientists. I'm not sufficiently familiar with the topic to judge whether it should be kept as a separate article, or should be removed, or maybe merged somewhere else. Opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --
94:
Actually: the text is insignificantly written, since ternary and Setun are mentioned by subordinate clauses, but the topic is highly interesting in a computer science perspective, since it claims that ternary computing is superior to binary! I propose that DSSP is merged into the Setun article.
116:
I have taken the comment by Rursus as a reason to remove the PROD notice. I have no opinion on this article. Somebody who doesn't think it's worthwhile should argue as much in an AfD. --
70:
85:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
102:
67:
62:
52:
38:
48:
99:
61:
I think your suspicions are correct and that the topic very likely isn't notable.
105:
117:
120:
110:
75:
55:
41:
37:
The result was that the topic is not notable. Will propose deletion. --
31:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
8:
7:
25:The following discussion is closed.
14:
81:The discussion above is closed.
1:
137:
121:06:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
111:07:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
76:14:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
56:09:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
42:17:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
83:Please do not modify it.
28:Please do not modify it.
49:Notability wikiproject
74:
128:
109:
65:
30:
136:
135:
131:
130:
129:
127:
126:
125:
96:
92:
87:
86:
47:As part of the
35:
26:
19:
12:
11:
5:
134:
132:
124:
123:
91:
88:
80:
79:
78:
45:
34:
33:
21:
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
133:
122:
119:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
107:
104:
101:
89:
84:
77:
72:
69:
64:
63:Iknowyourider
60:
59:
58:
57:
54:
53:B. Wolterding
50:
44:
43:
40:
39:B. Wolterding
32:
29:
23:
22:
17:Expert review
16:
97:
93:
82:
46:
36:
27:
24:
90:Notable!
100:Rursus
98:Said:
118:Hoary
106:★
103:☺
73:)
71:c
68:t
66:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.