Talk:Deadpool (film)/Archive 1

5437:

to instead have a whole sub-section of "Reception" discussing a major part of the film that had not yet been mentioned anywhere in the article. The problem here seems to be that you are interpreting the title "Industry impact" as meaning "This film had a massive impact on the entire film industry, read this section for more!" But in actual fact, it just says that the film has had some sort of impact on the film industry, and if someone reads the section they will find the specifics there—that the film has inspired several members of the film industry to attempt to replicate its success. -

1938: 1546: 4426:

something like "the superhero Deadpool". Both the second and third paragraph can be shortened for wording. For example, these two sentences seem optional to the lead section as already covered in the main body of the article: "The group wanted to faithfully adapt ... to an enthusiastic response." Same approach to trim the third paragraph of the lead section, and is that first sentence distinguishing the premiere date from the general release date four days later really needed in the lead section when its already covered in the main body of the article.

3613: 3383: 3342: 2489: 4091:. That is not to say that the film does not fall under multiple genres (as most superhero films do) and is not recognized for its achievements in other genres. This film in particular was also recognized for achievements in the action and comedy genres but is primarily identified as a superhero film. Other genres are listed as categories and achievements in other genres can still be listed in the lead and in the accolades section. Praise for its humorous elements can also be summarized in both the lead and critical response sections.-- 31: 5317:, with Development, Pre-production, Filming, and Post-production sections. This means that a lot of information is given in chronological order, such as cast members being stated as they were revealed to us rather than in a single section together (we do already have that in the cast section though). I have only created sub-sections of those production sections where the content has truly justified it (writing and visual effects). - 4840:

state: "Reese and Wernick wrote a draft of the script every year between joining the project and completing the film, including a PG-13 version that was briefly considered by the studio." Could it be stated as: "The writers wrote several drafts of the script prior to finishing the film, including a PG-13 version for studio consideration," or your more concise version of something like that.

1353:

this article is simply to declare it R-rated and proclaim this as Fox's first R-Rated superhero film which is not a notable thing. If there is something to be said about the R-rating such as impact on finances, or reasoning why, that could be included, but not that it is Fox's first R-rated superhero film. It's also even more untrue considering there is an R-rated cut of Daredevil out there.

3842: 3698: 3580: 3288: 2438: 2122: 1823: 1590: 1484: 4280: 567: 554: 1216:

warrant mentioning it in the Knowledge article. I find that is being done here and see potential to have content in the article body. The original problem was not ratings being written about in the wrong way, it was ratings just being plopped into the articles without encyclopedic merit, only serving to tell readers if it was okay to see a film.

5588:

look better as "led to". As I stated above, the references and citations in the article look well constructed and should provide a good foundation if you decide to develop the article further towards an FA article. It might be interesting to see if the ratings debate comes up again for Deadpool 2 when it is time for it to be reviewed by MPAA.

4941: 4546: 4473: 2324: 2272: 1705: 3898: 3806: 1884: 1656: 5332:

the narrative is more concisely and plainly presented. Possibly try this for one section, like the writing section, to see if you might adjust and trim the material to improve the narrative flow. The amount of effort you put into the citations and references is easy to recognize as done well. Ping my account when your updates are ready.

3320:

the franchise. Yes, two x-men show up in the current film but that does not anymore make it an X-men film than the Hulk being in Avengers makes it another Incredible Hulk Movie. The website Screen Rant provides an excellent list of reasons as to why the Current Dead pool is in no way connected to the one represented in the origins film.

3747: 2186: 4989:

With so much detail, the reader learns little of why so much money and time were devoted to the marketing of the film. Marketing is often emphasized as part of the economics of filmmaking and not just public appearances and similar interactions. Wording in section can be abridged with emphasis on how

3079:

See, that seems pretty trivial to me, just listing pop culture references like that. I think if we are going to do anything, it should be more of a paragraph; mention the main things like the post credit scene, Green Lantern, Wolverine, etc.; and have some sort of critical commentary so it isn't just

2351:

Is there a good spot somewhere to mention the unique/unconventional opening credits of the film, which list no real names but jokes about the cast and crew (i.e. "The Comic Relief" instead of T.J. Miller)? That seems like a noteworthy detail worth including in this article, I'm just not sure where or

596:

Thats what you basically wrote, you just identified and described what Fox was trying to do with these teasers which would lead to the 2nd trailer release. Nothing different from just copying and pasting from a news site. And the marketing section requires useful commentary. And viral marketing needs

573:

From you: "You put this article for review, and this "12 Days of Deadpool" would be criticize for its lack of useful commentary." No it wouldn't, because we have not gone against the MOS. This is the umbrella title for a marketing campaign. If we were to further state as such "On X date, a new poster

5603:

Thanks John, and thanks for sticking with me through all that re-writing and back-and-forth (also good catch with the 'lead/led', that is a mistake I make quite a bit). Just a note that for some reason the bot thinks you have failed this review, sending me a failure notice and not adding the GA icon

5587:

It was nice of you to do that extra research last night about ratings and to add that useful discussion in the article. The article is now promoted. You might want to check the spelling in the lead section where you state, "Reynolds lead to a green light from Fox in 2014," where the verb tense might

5436:

We shouldn't be discussing the production and marketing of the film in a sub-section of "Reception". The film's rating and tone is a major element that came up in all aspects of its production, which is why it is mentioned throughout the article in places that it is relevant. It would be problematic

5421:

might be closer to what is actually discussed in this section. 'Industry' is ambiguous and overly general here as a label. There is also a sentence on R-rating from this article's Marketing section which you could move to this section, and similar material from elsewhere in the article, to make your

5331:

That was a good start on your revisions. You are correct about the issue of narrative expression and narrative length as being a concern here. Since your citations and references are done so well, the improvements to the narrative in the article as a whole would make the citations more accessible if

5125:

Impact and accolades are often discussed together, and a separate section on impact seems not entirely useful. The notable material here can be moved to some of the other sections as needed, and even moved to the accolades main article or even the development section of Deadpool 2. Writing an impact

5097:

I've moved the top ten list to the accolades article, which just leaves a short summary of that separate article, and some discussion on the Oscars. The latter bit does not fit at the list of accolades article since the film did not actually get nominated for any Oscars, but I think it is worthwhile

4839:

The phrase "more modern scenes" is used in the citation you give as a relative term in comparison to the "origin" scenes which were discussed by the writers. Your version of this phrase seems different from the article cited. This section can be made shorter without loss of content. For example, you

4718:

It might be useful to start a financing section here to separate the money numbers from the historical and technical sequence of events in the filmmaking. Wording in this entire section can be trimmed for word length. Writing section is useful here though it may be also trimmed for word length. Does

3483:

He is saying it is not the 'Helicarrier', as in a S.H.I.E.L.D. aircraft, because otherwise there would be copyright issues with Marvel. Likewise, the writers have said that it was designed specifically to be different from the S.H.I.E.L.D. Helicarriers. However, it is still what we would refer to as

3319:

The following text should be removed: It is the eighth installment of the X-Men film series DeadPool is a stand alone, origins film, and not a part of the x-men film franchise. While the characters Wade Wilson and Dead Pool appear in X-men Origins: Wolverine the current film is in no way attached to

3262:

I must admit that this is a tough one. The movie and the comic, while obviously related, are separate entities, hence the separate articles. Unfortunately, we can't use details from the comic to enhance this article. That being said, when Wade rises from the ashes in the film, he narrates: "I didn't

3246:

This is actually important to Deadpool's character; he is not cancer free. His body's continual fight against his regenerating cancer is used to explain his disfigurement in the comics (though not in the movie), and his regenerating brain cancer is used to explain some of his mental instabilities.

2717:

I feel post-credits scenes in general should only be included when they involve prominent aspects of the plot. This isn't one of them. Even if other Marvel movies have post-credit scenes worth mentioning, this one doesn't really since Wade is just saying that the movie is over and that there will be

747:

As far as I'm aware, no. But I've always seen/had it told to me, you'd want the image to give a general overview of the film, so you use the general release teaser first, if it exists, and eventually the theatrical poster. IMAX posters, or character posters, are specialized ones that aren't meant to

510:

didn't exactly specify this kind of marketing campaign, it doesn't exclude to the rule of "Do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods such as trailers TV spots radio ads & posters Instead use reliable sources to provide useful commentary about a method". It is

4993:

The section is intended to note that they had a smaller than usual marketing budget so tried to use the internet to their advantage, then go through some of the different things they did, with discussion at the end of the section about the unusual marketing and how it worked for the character, etc.

4886:

Somewhat repetitive wording here: it was "revealed that" ... it was "revealed that". Wording throughout this section and its visualization section can be trimmed usefully. Separate editing section may be useful here to shorten some of these long sections and help reorganize the material between (a)

4528:

The last sentence in the plot section should be dropped as not being part of the plot of the film but more related to the marketing of the film. Once the credits start to role, the optional inclusion of voice-overs for the credits, promotional materials, and gag-reels are normally excluded from the

2795:

before I linked it to Ferris Bueller, but I did expand it. If this article had a cultural references section, I would suggest that most of the information going there. The post-credit scene is important for this movie, though, because it is one of the first mentions of Cable being in the movie. The

1352:

Prometheus discusses the film being made with full-on horror content but being filmed deliberately so that if the studio turned around at the last minute and said they wanted a teen-friendly cut to make more money, then that could be achieved without harming the overall film. The edit being made on

1308:

Yes, there are reasons here that have been articulated. I don't understand the dismissive stance claiming that there is no reason at all. Knowledge summarizes coverage from secondary sources, and these exist here to leverage, and WP:FILMRATING does not forbid using this coverage. Whatever consensus

1279:

Exactly, the reason why it's been getting so much coverage is because it's the first Fox R-rated superhero movie. It's significance has been mentioned by multiple outlets, and that is why it satisfies WP:FILMRATING. If people don't want to mention it, I'd like there to be a consensus not to include

5416:

After reading that section again, the section title referring to the film 'industry' as a whole seems to not match the contents of that section which discusses only one genre of film, the superhero franchises, as commented on by interested parties at Sony, Fox, Warner Bros, and Marvel. More to the

5383:

which preferred "Cinematic influence". "Franchise impact" or "Franchise influence" might also be an option. The other option might be to merge this section with the section that comes right after it in this article and to present the sequels and sister projects together as relating to one another.

4824:

That comes from the writing section, where the idea of the two timelines is introduced. And all the improv stuff is in the filming section because it happened during filming, and is a big part of the film's approach and tone. It is also referenced again later in the article, in the post-production

4429:

I have removed "wisecracking" and the film's premiere (I had the premiere in there just because that is what we usually do for film articles), but I am hesitant to remove the fouth wall-breaking, attempts at more faithful adaptation, and test footage leak. Those are all very significant aspects of

4383:

By my check, the article is just over 60Kb of readable prose, which is alright but could be cut down a little bit if we really want to. Some of the music section could go to the separate soundtrack page which would help. The reason this article is a little bigger than usual is because of the large

3101:

ok, then make the edits to my sandbox as you see fit. I was trying to write up as many of the references as I could and describe where they were in the film, without giving away too much. Basically, give enough info to let those who've seen it realize/remember where the reference is, while keeping

3031:

The MOS does seem to allow a section such as this as long as it is well sourced and doesn't go too in depth into the film (i.e. doesn't have a lot of plot details showing how the references are used in the film). However, it does seem like something that could get overly trivial and fanish if done

2600:

I'm confused because some people say it is not part of the x-men film series. When I saw some edits of this page, one person edit out the x-men reference saying that it is not an x-men film citing Ryan Reynolds, before it was undo and put back in the x-men film thing. So is Deadpool really part of

2397:

The are no sources that say that Andre Tricoteux gave the on set motion capture performance for Colossus. He was only credited as the stunt double for Colossus. There are sources that sya he was cast as Colossus, but then replaced. So unless someone adds a new source that say he was, please do not

1238:

R. Ever since the film was announced, online communities debated, "Would Fox actually make the film R to be faithful to the comics, or conform to the bottom line and get more ticket sales by making it PG-13?" So since they did make it R, I feel as though this is a non issue, because if it went the

691:

An IMAX theatrical release poster was released as a part of the '12 Days of Deadpool' campaign. I have added it as the poster on the page, seeing as it is more detailed and overall looks more epic and superhero-y. However, it has been removed several times, and I think that this is something that

5402:. And I think "Cinematic influence" is a bit of an exaggeration, as there is no big impact on cinema in general (yet). For now, the section just notes how some industry executives and studios have responded to the film's success, so I still think "Industry impact" is the most appropriate title. - 4606:

The narrative flow of these character descriptions still seems wordy even if you are set on keeping this format for the descriptions. Its understandable that you might be attached to all the nice references you found, though they should not interfere with the narrative flow of these descriptions.

4110:

There is an active lawsuit in the State of Utah between a local movie theater that screened Deadpool and the state Attorney General's office. The theater, which sells food and alcohol that may be consumed while watching a movie, was cited for breaking a longstanding Utah law that says you can not

1215:

WP:FILMRATING is being interpreted too strictly here; I was involved with writing these guidelines. They are not limited to the examples written down; it says, "Coverage of ratings can include..." The essence of the guidelines is that a rating needs to be talked about in some tangible capacity to

635:

So see? Viral websites aren't exception to this. Favre1fan93 basically merely identified and describe the content of customary marketing method which is the issue here. If we cannot mention posters, trailers without including an useful commentary, I don't see the point of even mentioning this one

4425:

Lead section appears a little long in phrasing and content. In the first paragraph, is it really necessary to give a three adjective description of the lead character: "wisecracking, fourth wall-breaking antihero Deadpool." If the film is introduced as a superhero film by genre, can he be called

3873:

In section "Cast" under Colossus - current: "and Glenn Ennis was used as 'the inspiration for the chiseled jaw look behind the character'"; suggested: "and Glenn Ennis, a stuntman working on the film, became "the inspiration for the chiseled jaw look behind the character", contributing a digital

2081:

I don't believe it's ever stated outright that the program is actually the Weapon X program. I believe it's not because of comments made by director Tim Miller. Where is the source for that information? Isn't it a variant on the Weapon X program without actually being program itself? Can someone

4584:

Cast section seem to include extensive material about character development which normally would be covered in the development section or the writing section. Consider either starting a character development section or moving the material to the writing section under the production section. The

4367:

Article assessment currently in preparation and may take a day or two. This article was nominated one year ago and was not passed because it was not stable. The current article appears to be stable. If you could indicate why the current article appears to be approaching 200Kb in size and if you

1028:

this should include "how a film is produced to target specific audiences, the late editing of a film to acquire a specific rating, or controversy over whether or not a film's rating was appropriately assigned." The MOS also suggests that the coverage be include in the release section but can be

5312:

Thanks for taking the time to review this article, I really appreciate it. I have gone through and replied to your points above. One thing that you bring up quite a bit is the the length of my wording is an issue. I have worked hard to cut down unnecessary quoting and say things in shorter and

3468:

from director Tim Miller who emphatically states that it is not a helicarrier. So now we have a source, ComicBook.com, that is contradicting itself. That being the case, I think the movie's director trumps a concept artist, it is not a helicarrier, and the reference should be removed from this

2575:

But you are making that up. We can't decide ourselves that this is "the Workshop, a variant of the Weapon X program", we can only go on what we have been told, which is that he is part of the Weapon X progrom, but they obviously decided not to use that name in the film, perhaps because they in

2542:

The source you just provided explains that the Workshop is part of Weapon X. But they are talking about the comics anyway and state that the film is less clear. So all we can really go off is the film, which refers to a workshop, and one of the actors, who says it is part of Weapon X. Hence we

5188:

There is no need to divide this material into 3 separate sections which should briefly state the related projects, which are independent of the current film discussed in this article. With filming already started on Deadpool 2, only the immediate sequel should be the point of emphasis in this

1253:

WP:FILMRATING is not looking for specific coverage. It just requires coverage to warrant writing about ratings in Knowledge articles. Editors can determine a consensus about whether or not to include the coverage linked above, but WP:FILMRATING does not dictate the kind of content. While your

5624:

The whole article seems to me far too detail-oriented. I know nothing about X-men, and after reading big chunks of this article, I still know nothing. It looks to me like this article failed to provide a high-level view of the film, story, etc, and eventually became just a huge collection of

3192:

I haven't seen the film, but I have a hard time believing this, in the plot section: "He then removes his mask (and the paper mask of Hugh Jackman he was wearing underneath)" Does the film actually identify the mask as a mask of the actor Hugh Jackman, as opposed to the character Wolverine?

3242:

The article states that Ajax's procedure cures Wilson's cancer. In the movie, Ajax states that Wilson's new healing factor is fighting his cancer, but his cancer is still present. I'll get you the exact quote when the DVD comes out. I've corrected this before, but it's been reverted.

626:"Do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods such as trailers, TV spots, radio ads, and posters. Instead, use reliable sources to provide useful commentary about a method, such as a trailer's intended effect or the audience's reported reaction to it. 515:, if you cannot find critical commentary to back this "12 Days of Deadpool", then don't put it here, plain and simple. We just cannot list down every marketing method in film articles. Thats why certain some marketing methods and marketing partners were removed in the film articles of 2687:

Been of the party that it should be included, especially since every recent Marvel movie has had mentions of events happening in the post-credits sequence, not to mention the original source of material, Ferris Bueller's Day Off, also had the post-credits scene mentioned in its plot

486:

Also, this article is way in need of archive links. I've added one or two but there are a lot of footnotes and if every editor could do one or two it would spread the work around and we could get it done before links have a chance to rot — as two of them already did that I rescued.

4592:. This information is specific to each of the characters rather than in scope of the overall production, so it seems better to have a short paragraph beside the character's name rather than information for lots of different characters sprinkled throughout the production section. - 3993:

Indeed. This section is the bro equivalent of the overly eager hipster indie movie write-up that mentions the film won the "Best Cameo" award at the film festivals in Cleveland, Slough, Lille, Omaha, Bochum, Glasgow, Kranoyarsk, Thunder Bay, Harare, and Quezon City. Good grief.

904:

The micromanaging that goes on on this site is so petty - overly so. Just looking at the trailers for the film, and then looking at the IMAX version of the poster anyone can see that the IMAX one is a more accurate description/depiction of what the film will be. 'Nuff said. -

4854:

I do appreciate what you mean here, and will attempt to be more concise throughout the article, but the example you have given here is just removing information, not re-writing the same information in a more concise way, and that is something I would rather avoid if I can. -

802:

Thanks Steel1943. I thought it was confusing to be that way as well. The IMAX poster is more detailed, and shows a lot more of what the film will entail. I think any film poster that expresses the film's premise more definitively aught to be the image for the page, as well.

897:

And just like that someone reverted the image back to the cheeseball poster that really has nothing to do with the fact that the "the infobox image should ideally be the generally most representative version of the film and/or its marketing" as :::TriiipleThreat just

3970:

The box office "records broken" section is looking seriously bloated and unencyclopedic. It's clear this film was broke a bunch of records, but that section's unreadable as is. Needs to be clear and concise (like it appears someone was working on with the table).

940:

I've done a couple just now, and I'd urge all the editors who work on this page regularly to start going through and archiving citation links at Archive.org and/or WebCitation.org. Otherwise, it's very likely that in a year, 20-25% of these links may be dead.

1790:

I get that the movie set new records, but do we really need to list such Petty Records such as: February Preview, February IMAX Preview, R-Rated IMAX Preview, Winter Season Opening Weekend, Holiday/Long Weekend Opening Weekend, R-Rated PLF Opening Weekend.

1990:

Not sure why you pointed this out. However, I do find it interesting that there is no mention of the movie's "R" rating in this article. This is not unheard of for superhero movies, but it is a first for 20th Century Fox. Seems noteworthy enough to me (see

4820:

Not sure what the reference to "modern scenes" in the second paragraph here is referring to. Also, what is the discussion of Reynolds's improvs and off-the-cuff material doing in the closing paragraph of the filming section. Is it needed in this section?

3116:

I added the reference to Detroit. If there are no additional edits to the sandbox in the next 7 days (March 8, 2016 4pm Eastern), I will add it to the page. If edits are made, it will be added 7 days after the last edit or once an agreement is reached.

5192:

This is the format used for all film articles that I have looked at. If you really think that this article should be doing something different to that, then I can look at changing the section, but I don't see why this one should be any different. -

4904:

Narrative flow is still an issue here. The citations here are good, though it sometimes has the appearance of looking like a list of sentences, all cited, grouped together as paragraphs. You can shorten this material and still preserve its meaning.

2702:

I think it depends on how it is written. It should be included if it is written so as to further the plot of the franchise (as many such summaries for other Marvel movies are). Unfortunately, the plot summary here is a bit of a mess anyway. -

1254:

argument holds water, we have to remember not to assume readers' knowledge of these matters. Superhero films in general are intended to be blockbusters, so studios do not want to restrict their audience too much. So it is worthwhile to put

2166:

The ref below isn't the best, but at least it's third party verification of what I just saw in the movie (finished it 15ish minutes ago, looked it up because I was curious about something, then saw this inaccuracy--just trying to help)

773:

Feel free to use the IMAX poster as there's no rule for not using IMAX posters in infoboxes.The poster also showcaess the other characters in the film which is more ideal to use IMO compare to the current poster used in the article. If

527:

for the lack of useful/critical commentary. You put this article for review, and this "12 Days of Deadpool" would be criticize for its lack of useful commentary. You might as well include magazine covers and TV interviews just because

2671:

Since there seems to be a bit of an Edit War with including the Post Credits Scene in the Plot Section; maybe there can be a compromise with adding the info from the Post Credits Scene from the Plot Section to the Sequel section?

1294:

Let's be clear here, if there is a reason to add it (and there isn't because it's a simple rating applied by a manufactured system), it definitely is not some made up achievement like it being Fox's first R-rated superhero film.

4990:

much money was budgeted and why the marketing campaign was this extensive. It appears that the film did not sell itself, as would be expected of other films which might deal with famous historical events or be otherwise unique.

5422:

point about rating system implications for superhero films. The Marketing section is already somewhat long and the move of the ratings discussion from there to this section would unify the R-rating discussion in this article.

3729:

Original: Ajax subdues Wade, impales him with a peice of rebar and leaves him for dead in the burning laboratory. Edited: Ajax subdues Wade, impales him with a piece of rebar and leaves him for dead in the burning laboratory.

3521:

version does. If you want to clear it up further, you could find the interview where the writers talk about designing the Helicarrier and add it to that section over there just to confirm that it isn't part of S.H.I.E.L.D. -

1258:

in the context of these films. If others really do not see an opportunity now, we can keep a lookout for commentary when MPAA officially announces the rating, as well as follow-up marketing and the theatrical release itself.

856:

but the infobox image should ideally be the generally most representative version of the film and/or its marketing. The IMAX version, with its limited number of screens, does not accurately portray the general release of the

5093:

There is already a main article for this and the material should be abridged and shortened. The top ten list is not very useful and can be moved to the main article for accolades for this film and removed from this article.

778:

reverts your edit, then I'll revert his edit since there's already a 2 against 1 consensus regarding using the IMAX poster in the infobox and there was never a rule/guideline that "WE" editors don't use IMAX posters in the

717:

I have no opinion on this nor care about the outcome, but ... is the precedence for not using IMAX posters documented somewhere as a policy or guideline? I'm just curious so that I can refer to the precedence later.

4122:

on the effects of watching Deadpool while drinking alcohol on society. I think this would be an interesting addition to the Deadpool article, however I do not see a good place to add this. Any suggestions? thanks.

3536:

I just thought the term "helicarrier" was specific to the S.H.I.E.L.D. ship, and that anything else is simply referred to as a "flying platform." But if it's a more generic term than I understand it to be, that's

4934:

There is a main article for this and there is no need for more than a single short paragraph here. If it did not directly influence the production of the film, then it should be taken to the soundtrack page.

4744:

Your text in this section still seems to be on the long side for what is being stated. I will include an example below to try to demonstrate what I mean. You can express much of this material in fewer words.

3516:

No, it should be fine. That article is just about Helicarriers in general. It notes in the lead that the original comic version belonged to S.H.I.E.L.D., but the film section rightly doesn't specify that the

2770:

will be featured." However, this information can easily be included elsewhere in the article (most of it already is, actually), so I guess I aggree with SNUGGUMS and support having no post-credits summary. -

1045:

Pretty sure that Blade and Blade II were both R-rated, and such jingocentric coverage about an arbitrary rating established on a completely localised basis does not belong in the article or any article.

1313:

summarizes coverage about its "simple rating applied by a manufactured system". Ratings can indeed be absurd, but it is up to us editors to document the filmmaking and marketing decisions behind them.

5379:

Your edits in the sections overnight are a useful move forward in enhancing the narrative flow in this article. Regarding your sticking to your section title of "Industry impact", my example was from

5313:

shorter paragraphs as I developed this article, so if you think it isn't good enough could you please give more specific examples? Also note that I am following the general structure that is given at

5451:

You appear to be online at this time and it would be useful if you could provide me with one or two examples of any recent film that has an Industry impact section. I only need one or two examples.

2041:

The exclusion of that scene could illustrate a future mention of the R rating. The source also says that two actors came up with lines, which should be mentioned as part of the film's development.

4001: 2608: 5157:

It didn't really have an impact on cinema in general, but it does appear to have some sort of impact on the way the industry discusses superhero films. I'll try to cut this down a bit anyway. -

3017:

It may not be the usual for movies, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be included, especially since this movie has so many references. It could be a sub-section under a meta-fictional section.

3208:

I don't think it belongs in the plot summary, which in general needs a good rewrite I think, but it is true. It's one of the many things that comes of Deadpool and his fourth wall-breaking. -

5417:

point seems to be that the "R"-rating of the film seems to be the recurrent topic of this section and its implications for the future of filmmaking in this genre alone. Possibly a title like

1794:

What's next? Record for R-Rated Movie with Man in Red Tights IMAX Opening Weekend? Record for February Best Long Weekend Holiday Season for Sunday at 3:20PM R-Rated IMAX Opening PLF Weekend?

2993:

before reminding the audience to pick up their trash." (what the article currently has). However, I'm not sure if pop culture references tend to be considered within scope of film articles.

2055:

The movie's rating is now included in the lead and the "Box Office" section, which state that Deadpool had the biggest opening ever for an R-rated movie. I think that settles the matter.

5522: 5471:, that uses it in a similar way to here (a specific aspect from the project being replicated by others in the industry). I can have a better look for film examples later if you want. - 88: 3150:

to me. Instead of trying to list every pop cultural reference, how about trying to the fold the more talked about ("analyzed") examples into the prose of the pre-production section.--

4456:". Second paragraph in lead section can still be shortened. Deadpool 3 should be left out of the lead since if Deadpool 2 is not a hit, then there will likely be no sequel to it. 483:

here — the cast does not have to footnoted in both the cast section AND the prose casting section. If it's cited in the latter, there is no need to double-cite it in the former.

3940:

I've reverted that as premature because there still are pending accolades AND still hardly any reviews from critics. Definitely not broad enough in coverage for renomination.

3674:

Before that process can begin, I think we really need to clean up the footnotes. Formatting is inconsistent, and there are punctuation errors and virtually no archive links.--

364:). I suppose a sentence stating that the rating was undecided would be fine, but we need at least one other source to back up that the studio was unsure of which way it'd go. 5207:

All three sections should be combined into one brief section here. Also, if Deadpool 2 is not a hit, then its unlikely that it will have a sequel in a third installment.

1995:). I'm wondering if it ought to be mentioned, perhaps in the "Release" section. I see from above that this was discussed at length last year, but nothing ever came of it. 1080:

I find there to be sufficient coverage from reliable sources to mention the film rating in the article. It is not the first such film to get an R rating, but it is rare.

511:

still a marketing method. Mind you, a trailer is more qualified as an encyclopedic material than this one, and a trailer requires a critical commentary just to pass MOS.

2800:

connection, seem to be in most of the news articles about the movie right now. But of course, I'm biased since I was the one who originally wrote about the connection.

1920:

Could you provide a link to this infobox rule? I can't seem to find it and because it's not intuitive I'd like to see the explanation for it given somewhere. Thanks!

4285: 3060:

Ok, got the references I could remember and find references to (nothing on the Subway comment that isn't from a forum.) Take a look and make changes/additions here:

4318: 4138:

I don't think it is relevant to this article, since the film itself is not party to the lawsuit. It would be better served in the article about the theater chain.--

3032:

wrong. Perhaps if somebody wants to make up an expanded, referenced section in their sandbox so we can all see what it is going to look like before we put it in? -

2752:

before reminding the audience to pick up their trash." That is obviously ridiculous and completely un-encyclopaedic. I would be fine with something more like "In a

1687:

The wording "subjected to days of torture methods" is surely wrong. Subjected to days of torture, or subjected to days of painful treatment is surely more accurate.

5353:

I understand what your concern is with the amount of words I am using, and have tried to go through the article and cut down on that. Let me know how I've done. -

4774:

Length of wording is an issue here. The material is well-cited and referenced. It just seems to be very long for the coverage of the main points in this section.

2970:

Each of these could be explained more in depth, making it so that the post-credit scene could be be better mentioned, as well as moving it from the Plot section.

4726:

I don't know if there is really enough information for a whole subsection on the financing of the film, since we only mention it in a couple of lines. Likewise,

2162:

since SHE REMOVES THE MASK (he remains too embarrassed), which is part of her showing him that she loves and accepts him regardless of what he might look like.

352:

But there was never any point in which anyone confirmed a rating. Usually, we only include rating information if there was a dispute over the rating (like with

3417:. I know it is widely believed to be a hellicarrier but nowhere in the movie does it explicitly state this fact. Is there any sources that can be referenced? 2082:

clarify this? I know Ed has said its weapon x, but he doesn't out right say it to that affect, making it confirmed. It wasn't even stated in the film itself.

4308: 2639:

trilogy. So though the film tells its own story and is ultimately pretty separate from the other films, it is still part of the overall film series (just as

997: 260:

If we find strong enough third party sources, there might be some warrant to adding this. (And I stand corrected on my statement above about April Fools.) -

5503:

Okay, I've had a look around and there seems to be a reasonably consistent use of "Cinematic influence" for this sort of thing, as you had mentioned with

246:

I think this can be covered somewhat, because this was a big question in the industry if a Deadpool film could be pulled off if Fox wanted to go PG-13. -

5521:

That sounds like a good direction to take and adapting the section title to that would be useful. After you do that, it might be interesting to look at

4083:

explicitly states, "At minimum, the opening sentence should identify the following elements: the title of the film, the year of its public release, and

2718:

a sequel. It's not like he's saying what will happen in the sequel or what happened in between the ending and post-credits bit. Nothing really major.

1732:

In the Box Office section, it says "The Hollywood Reporter called it "no small feat" considering it's the first Marvel superhero film to be rated R."

5525:, in the section titled "effects of ratings" there, to see if something notable can be added to this influence section regarding effects of ratings. 4687:

Since casting happened throughout the production of the film, even after they had finished filming, I don't really think that is an option here. -

4388:

the long development and extensive marketing are both pretty major parts of the film and I am reluctant to cut them down and/or split them off. -

4119: 2299:

This section needs to be changed. As it reads right now Cannonball is the one with metal arms and Kane is the hickboy. The reverse is correct.

1009:

In other words, the film's R-rating has generated significant amount of coverage about its impact and how it will affect the movie for viewers.

4368:

believe this is justified as is, or, if you might be open to considering the possibility of developing and/or abridging some of the sections.

991: 582:(a Good Article I might add) the inclusion in its marketing section, the "Galaxy Getaways" viral marketing. It is the same premise as this. - 4890:

I've cut down on the use of "revealed". I don't think the one paragraph on editing justifies having a separate editing sub-section though. -

1907: 4290: 963:, you have repeatedly deleted mention about the film's rating because "there is not substantial coverage about it". That is not true, there 4159: 3881: 2469: 1451:

The official run time for Deadpool has been classified by the BBFC as 108 minutes (1 hour and 48 minutes long). Here's the link for proof:

3263:

just get the cure to el cancer, I got the cure to el everything." So is he cured or not? I think the movie is inconclusive on the matter.

2524: 3788: 3655: 2306: 1867: 810: 4087:

primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified." It purposely does not state primary genres or sub-genres to avoid

4005: 3977: 2612: 5129:

I don't really understand combining the impact and accolades sections, because a film's impact on the industry is not an accolade. -

3878: 4357: 4046: 3874:

rendering after Miller spotted him, saying ‘You know what, I like your face.’" Alternatively ending after "behind the character.".

3465: 1430: 1397:

It is released in the UK on the 10th, and a lot of other places in Europe on the 11th. Can the article be changed to reflect this?

400: 1003: 396: 4384:

development and marketing sections. They are both sections that I don't usually see there being much info for, but in the case of

2748:, Wade bids the audience to leave because the movie is over. Wade however has a change of heart and announces a sequel featuring 692:

should be remedied. The poster can be seen via, x-menfilms.com which includes other X-Men film information and posters as well.

562:

Do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods such as trailers, TV spots, radio ads, and posters.

92: 4234: 2989:, Wade bids the audience to leave because the movie is over. Wade however has a change of heart and announces a sequel featuring 2260: 1413: 979: 4673:

and could, as an option, be added there as part of the development section as you already have done with your writing section.

4313: 967:

been substantial coverage about it. Seeing as how it's the first R-rated Marvel film, you can't expect that there wouldn't be.

3953: 3198: 3006: 2864: 2731: 2527:- I cant seem to find any other sources but he doesn't call it the 'Weapon X' program in the film, he calls it the Workshop. 2380: 579: 66: 1116: 4730:

is only mentioned briefly when it had an impact on this film's development, and in a single line of the writing section. -

2576:

general tried to avoid the continuity of the other films. So again, we should say Weapon X, but not in the plot summary. -

1368: 628:

For example, the viral marketing campaign for Cloverfield began with an untitled teaser trailer that generated strong hype.

5143:

This section should be titled as 'cinematic impact'. The film had a good box office, it did not change Hollywood forever.

2888:

Having just seen the movie for a second time, I feel like there should be a Cultural References section. Something like:

1322: 1268: 1225: 1132: 1097: 1081: 661: 4994:

Knowing that, is there anything specific in the section that you feel is unclear or could require further discussion? -

3765: 1956: 241: 4049:

is titled, "The Deadpool Early Reviews Are Overwhelmingly Positive". My version of this is "Early critical reviews for

2839:

isn't really worth noting. If the mentioning post-credits scene at all, it would be better to use something like "In a

2253: 1285: 1014: 4430:

the film, that are widely discussed throughout the body of the article, and that should be reflected in the lead per

1185:

Also the wording "will be the first" is problematic as we don't know how the MPAA will rule. "Intended" is better.--

388: 4514:

I'm not sure what you mean by this. The scene is still part of the film, even if the sequel has started filming. -

4128: 4053:

were overwhelmingly positive." Without explanation (edit summary, talk page comments, etc.), this was reverted to "

3433: 1757: 1520: 1358: 1300: 1064: 1051: 523: 517: 354: 38: 3619:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.

3348:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.

2495:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.

1973: 1309:

we determine should not be bound to that guideline. I find the bar being set too high here. Even Featured Article

327:

relevant because it has been debated among comic fans and critics/journalists alike about the rating of the film.

197: 3223:

Someone should add that the scene in the credits is a parody of the scene at the end of Ferris Bueller's Day Off.

2986: 2758: 2744: 2251:

The north american box office records list is a little excessive. Perhaps we could put a show/hide button on it?

1900: 80: 5384:

The Marvel franchise impact and influence would then be in the context of the sequel having started production.

5008:

Length of wording affects the narrative continuity of this section. It can be abridged without loss of meaning.

3735: 3330: 4336: 4254: 4163: 4143: 4096: 3822: 3390: 3194: 3155: 2957: 2624: 2473: 2174: 1776: 1190: 1162: 1034: 862: 3885: 2367:

Unless we can find something like a critic praising that aspect, I can't really think of a good place for it.

3792: 3659: 2310: 1925: 1871: 825:

Umm... I don't understand what is going here on regards to me ... I don't support or oppose the IMAX poster.

174: 133: 3981: 3848: 3704: 3586: 3542: 3507: 3474: 3294: 3268: 2444: 2357: 2128: 2060: 2032: 2000: 1829: 1692: 1643: 1596: 1570: 1490: 1157:. It could however be mentioned with more in depth coverage of the R-rating as suggested by the guideline.-- 910: 814: 548: 4588:

This is the format used in all the GA film articles I have been involved in, and is based on guidelines at

3731: 3326: 1516: 4332: 4201: 3349: 2208: 2170: 1464: 1376: 1310: 1281: 1010: 446: 360: 1772: 5642: 5609: 5593: 5548: 5530: 5512: 5494: 5476: 5456: 5442: 5427: 5407: 5389: 5358: 5337: 5322: 5295: 5230: 5212: 5198: 5162: 5148: 5134: 5103: 5013: 4999: 4953: 4910: 4895: 4860: 4845: 4830: 4796: 4782: 4750: 4735: 4692: 4678: 4660: 4626: 4612: 4597: 4558: 4534: 4519: 4485: 4461: 4439: 4408: 4393: 4373: 4351: 4124: 3910: 3527: 3489: 3398: 3321: 3213: 3085: 3037: 2947: 2923: 2776: 2708: 2656: 2581: 2548: 2418: 2336: 2284: 2018: 1921: 1753: 1688: 1672: 1664: 1354: 1296: 1244: 1154: 1060: 1047: 1025: 973: 906: 880: 753: 701: 587: 422: 281: 265: 251: 5225:). We can only go off what we know, and at the moment we know that they are developing a third film. - 2543:

mention the Weapon X connection, but not in the plot section since the name wasn't used in the film. -

1639: 109:

What happened to his inclusion on the film? Was he ever confirmed to be apearing in the film or is he

4607:

They seem a bit wordy even though well-cited. Try to shorten the wording in each of the descriptions.

1153:"Fox films for a Marvel character" is such a small subset, I don't thing that factoid alone satisfies 4511:

Closing sentence referencing the sequel seems unneeded since the sequel has already started filming.

4230: 4222: 4186: 4115: 3997: 3784: 3651: 3569:" and the highest grossing 20th Century Fox film ever not directed by James Cameron or George Lucas" 3062: 2963: 2604: 2302: 2010: 1992: 1893: 1409: 1405: 1401: 806: 636:

since its not even as notable and important to the subject compare to a trailer or a teaser poster.--

480: 214: 47: 17: 5485:

One or two examples from films would be good. Films that can be nominated for film awards just like

3224: 1735:

This should either be completely ommited or changed since it is not the first Rated R Marvel movie.

551:: "A film's marketing campaign may be detailed in its Knowledge article if reliable sources exist." 4250: 4139: 4092: 4088: 4028: 3930: 3818: 3498:

OK. The problem, though, is that the first reference in this article does link to the S.H.I.E.L.D.

3455: 3437: 3422: 3228: 3167: 3151: 2929: 2896: 2677: 2562: 2528: 2098: 2083: 1804: 1742: 1535: 1441: 1186: 1158: 1030: 858: 836: 729: 673: 665: 456: 404: 328: 294: 200: 178: 155: 136: 114: 4112: 3879:

http://www.theprovince.com/vancouver+stuntman+face+takes+heights+deadpool+ally/11720792/story.html

4589: 4246: 4080: 3947: 3679: 3538: 3503: 3470: 3441: 3264: 3000: 2858: 2840: 2753: 2725: 2566: 2532: 2500: 2374: 2353: 2102: 2087: 2056: 2046: 2028: 1996: 1980: 1717: 1566: 1437: 946: 677: 669: 492: 460: 408: 332: 298: 204: 182: 159: 140: 118: 2519:, not the Weapon X program. Ajax actor obviously misspoke when he was doing his interview. It's 275: 2559:

Ed Skrein as Francis Freeman/Ajax: The owner of the Workshop, a variant of the Weapon X program

1891:

It is linked above as he is a producer. A persons name is to only be linked once in infoboxes.

5398:

Its not really about the sequel though, its more about other Hollywood studios trying to copy

5222: 4196: 3177: 3122: 3107: 3070: 3051: 3022: 2975: 2826: 2805: 2192: 1460: 1372: 1318: 1264: 1239:

PG-13 route, the coverage would be more in line with what WP:FILMRATING is looking for IMO. -

1221: 1128: 1093: 784: 641: 606: 537: 442: 5221:

I'll try this then, but we can't start speculating about what will happen in the future (see

4585:

extensive embellishments should be moved out of the cast section and significantly abridged.

5638: 5605: 5589: 5544: 5526: 5508: 5490: 5472: 5452: 5438: 5423: 5403: 5385: 5354: 5348: 5333: 5318: 5307: 5291: 5226: 5208: 5194: 5158: 5144: 5130: 5099: 5009: 4995: 4949: 4906: 4891: 4856: 4841: 4826: 4792: 4778: 4746: 4731: 4688: 4674: 4656: 4622: 4608: 4593: 4554: 4530: 4515: 4481: 4457: 4435: 4404: 4389: 4369: 4347: 3906: 3777:

Deadpool was not a Special Forces operative. The more appropriate word would be "operator".

3759: 3625: 3523: 3485: 3394: 3252: 3209: 3147: 3096: 3081: 3033: 2816: 2772: 2704: 2652: 2577: 2544: 2414: 2332: 2280: 2236: 2014: 1950: 1668: 1557: 1240: 960: 876: 775: 749: 712: 697: 616: 583: 512: 290: 277: 261: 247: 392: 4226: 4182: 3852: 3708: 3298: 2693: 2448: 2403: 2132: 1833: 1771:

He was in the film during the end fight scene and is credited on imdb, should he listed? §

1600: 1494: 5126:

and accolades section seems unneeded when there is already a main article for accolades.

2985:

That's an interesting idea and definitely better than "In a post-credits scene parodying

619:

chose to ignore what I said. Interesting how he chose to bring up a "good article" while

3648:

There is no Knowledge rule that says a name cannot be linked twice in Summary section.

3484:

a 'helicarrier', being an aircraft carrier that can fly (or could fly, at one point). -

5467: 4431: 4174: 4018: 3926: 3451: 3418: 2990: 2901: 2848: 2767: 2749: 2673: 1800: 1738: 1531: 985: 872: 853: 826: 768: 742: 719: 372: 314: 225: 5646: 5613: 5597: 5552: 5534: 5516: 5498: 5480: 5460: 5446: 5431: 5411: 5393: 5362: 5341: 5326: 5299: 5234: 5216: 5202: 5166: 5152: 5138: 5107: 5017: 5003: 4957: 4914: 4899: 4864: 4849: 4834: 4800: 4786: 4754: 4739: 4696: 4682: 4664: 4630: 4616: 4601: 4562: 4538: 4523: 4489: 4465: 4443: 4412: 4397: 4377: 4361: 4258: 4238: 4206: 4190: 4167: 4147: 4132: 4100: 4070: 4034: 4009: 3985: 3959: 3934: 3914: 3889: 3826: 3796: 3770: 3739: 3683: 3663: 3630: 3546: 3531: 3511: 3493: 3478: 3459: 3445: 3426: 3402: 3376: 3334: 3272: 3256: 3232: 3217: 3202: 3181: 3159: 3126: 3111: 3089: 3074: 3055: 3041: 3026: 3012: 2979: 2870: 2830: 2809: 2780: 2737: 2712: 2697: 2681: 2660: 2616: 2585: 2570: 2552: 2536: 2504: 2477: 2422: 2407: 2386: 2361: 2340: 2314: 2288: 2263: 2218: 2178: 2106: 2091: 2064: 2050: 2036: 2022: 2004: 1984: 1961: 1929: 1915: 1875: 1808: 1780: 1760: 1746: 1721: 1696: 1676: 1647: 1574: 1560: 1539: 1524: 1468: 1417: 1380: 1361: 1326: 1303: 1289: 1272: 1248: 1229: 1194: 1166: 1136: 1101: 1067: 1054: 1038: 1018: 950: 914: 884: 866: 840: 818: 788: 757: 733: 705: 681: 645: 610: 591: 541: 496: 464: 450: 412: 381: 336: 302: 285: 269: 255: 234: 208: 186: 163: 144: 122: 96: 4452:

character description and state: "... antihero Deadpool with a tendency to break the

3941: 3675: 2994: 2911: 2852: 2719: 2496: 2368: 2042: 1976: 1713: 1433: 1024:

Finding reliable sources is the first step, now add the coverage to the article. Per

942: 488: 2899:

and his own movie, but also reference other parts of popular culture. This includes

4178: 3814: 3173: 3118: 3103: 3066: 3047: 3018: 2971: 2822: 2801: 1553: 1314: 1260: 1217: 1124: 1089: 849: 780: 637: 602: 574:

came out." That would fail the MOS. This is all leading up to a new trailer, which

533: 79:

Shouldn't the original source of the release date be added to the page? Here's the

2398:

add that Andre Tricoteux gave the on set motion capture performance for Colossus.

4195:

I don't believe reliable sources commonly identify either as any sort of porn...

4453: 3754: 3620: 3499: 3414: 3248: 2892: 2557:

well if anything gets a mention in the Cast section it should go as followed - "

2213: 1945: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1452: 1119:

does state that this would be Fox's first R-rated film for a Marvel character.

4670: 3502:. At the very least, we should remove that wikilink immediately, shouldn't we? 2689: 2399: 927: 992:"'Deadpool' Star Ryan Reynolds Gets R-Rated in Hilarious Comic-Con Interview" 2941: 2935: 2917: 365: 307: 218: 4339:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 4245:

It is categorized as a comedy with the rest of the categories. However per

4158:

it is not soft porn either but hard porn. far more extreme than james bond.

2647:

film series, even if it is telling its own separate story from the current

1234:

I actually think there would be more merit in discussing the rating if it

578:

we would need the critical commentary. For a comparable situation, see on

5314: 4449: 4118:. The theater owners and the Attorney General are arguing over who is an 2955:, as well as the post-credit scene referencing the post-credit scenes of 620: 529: 507: 5290:

That should get things started. Ping my account for any clarifications.

4652:

There is no casting section here. See comments for cast section above.

2906: 1752:

It's not a Marvel movie either. It's a fox movie of a Marvel property.

3389:

Please see the "Is this an X-Men film?" section above, which links to

748:

encompass the whole film, as it were, just a specific aspect of it. -

3322:

http://screenrant.com/worst-deadpool-scenes-x-men-origins-wolverine/

2742:

At the moment, the summary reads "In a post-credits scene parodying

2153:"Wade turns to Vanessa, and removes his mask to show her his face." 5507:

earlier. I am coming around to that one as an alternative title. -

5634: 5543:

to try and show the change in thinking that is being discussed. -

5489:

was nominated for film awards during the last film awards season.

4219:

Any reason why this is not categorized as a comedy film as well?

3413:

It says in the Plot section that the last battle takes place on a

2159:"Wade turns to Vanessa who removes his mask, revealing his face." 532:

didn't specifically mention it, if we are going with your logic.--

434: 5098:

discussing it here due to the wide coverage the situation got. -

1455:. Please insert the new runtime on the Deadpool movie wiki page. 5539:

I've added some stuff on how R-rated films were received before

4154:

the article should mention that pornographic nature of the movie

2952: 425:

in one sense: there is some significance in the rating, because

3925:

I'm Renominating this for Good Article based on changes made.

3642: 1855: 1565:

All reliable sources say the budget is modest, yet undisclosed.

3836: 3692: 3574: 3282: 2796:

scene, specifically the mention of casting of Cable & the

2432: 2116: 1972:

This link elaborates on a scene cut due to its vulgar nature:

1817: 1584: 1478: 25: 4723:

when there is already a main article for that Reynolds film.

2843:, Deadpool tells the audience that there will be a sequel to 1767:

Rob Hayter as Bob, Agent of HYDRA inclusion as cameo to list?

3046:

Working on it in my sandbox. Give me a day to finish it up.

1004:"Comic Con 2015: Deadpool Trailer Puts R-Rating to Good Use" 3905:

Doesn't really add anything that we didn't already know. -

3247:

At any rate, he is not declared cancer-free in the movie.

441:

was certified "adults only", despite being PG-13 abroad.)

4791:

See my example below to an example of length of wording.

4249:, we only list the primary genre in the lead paragraph.-- 2785:

I added it to both this article and the mention of it on

2523:

stated in the film. Here is a source to back this claim:

2237:

http://www.themoviespoiler.com/2016Spoilers/Deadpool.html

597:

useful critical commentary, go check the film article of

5523:

Motion Picture Association of America film rating system

5189:

section, briefly, since there is a main article for it.

4060:

I have restored my version and await any discussion. -

2791: 1059:

Punisher War Zone also definitely has to be an R film.

4887:

post-production, (b) editing, and *c) visual effects.

1854:

Ryan Reynolds mentioned but his name is not a link (

980:"R-Rated 'Deadpool' Trailer Panders To The Converted" 564:" (their emphasis) we don't have any of those (yet). 4027: 4024: 4017: 5465:From a quick first look I have found a TV article, 4669:Casting is normally seen as part of development in 4057:received generally positive reviews from critics." 998:"What Deadpool's Hard R-Rating Means for the Movie" 974:"Meet Deadpool, the first 'hard-R' rated superhero. 3641:Ryan Reynolds listed but his name is not a link ( 1728:First Rated R Marvel movie needs to be changed... 986:"Confirmed: ‘Deadpool’ Will Of Course Be Rated R" 2895:character, he is able to reference not only the 5633:. If you want to learn about the X-Men then go 4403:Begin assessment of article by section titles. 4016:I don't see any problems with it to be honest. 3637:Ryan Reynolds name not link in Starring section 3607:I would like to add a brief edit to this page. 3102:those who have not seen the movie in the dark. 2429:Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2016 2113:Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2016 1814:Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2016 1712:Good catch on that unwieldy, wordy phrasing. -- 1556:that support the change you want to be made. -- 2515:Francis clearly states in the film that it is 2511:Weapon X program is NOT featured in this film! 1475:Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2016 970:Here is a sample of the substantial coverage: 274:Here's your source, from the actor's twitter. 192:R-Rating confirmed by Ryan Reynolds and Joblo. 4111:sell alcohol where full nudity is displayed. 2762:), announcing that there will be a sequel to 871:SuperHotWiki is also wrong in that consensus 8: 3279:Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2016 2756:, Deadpool talks to the audience (parodying 1786:Box Office Record Breakers are Over Abundant 1453:http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/deadpool-2016 696:We don't use IMAX posters in the infobox. - 128:Synopsis and official logo/costume revealed. 84: 2821:I'd be fine with your suggested statement. 2651:saga films; that is what spin-offs are). - 4268: 4220: 3995: 3833:Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2016 3782: 3689:Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2016 3649: 2602: 2300: 1515:the budget of this film is 40 million USD 804: 1391:Release date is the 12th in the US only 150:Ed Skrein confirmed via Official Website. 5284:No need for separate section, see above. 5270:No need for separate section, see above. 5256:No need for separate section, see above. 4655:See above and my reply at the bottom. - 3645:) in Summary frame in Starring section. 3393:, where this has also been discussed. - 169:Ed Skrein is playing "Ridge" in Deadpool 4719:this article really need discussion of 4299: 4271: 2561:who blah blah blah". It couldn't hurt. 2229: 2097:the facility is called 'the Workshop'. 1084:mentions that rarity and also mentions 920: 4002:2601:2C0:8080:4550:6C8D:95B7:BF1C:FB64 3643:https://en.wikipedia.org/Ryan_Reynolds 2635:, which is a spin-off of the original 2627:as well, and the short answer is yes. 2609:2601:648:8503:282E:949B:15FF:91CE:173C 2413:I have added a new source for this. - 1856:https://en.wikipedia.org/Ryan_Reynolds 1367:Now that the film has been officially 1311:Prometheus (2012 film)#Post-production 656:Karan Soni as Dopinder, the cab driver 75:Original source for Film release date? 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4019: 2483:Lots of people die in this movie!!!! 1530:Is there a reliable source for this? 7: 433:film to receive that rating (but in 4621:I've tried to cut down on these. - 4089:over-linking and run-on descriptors 3080:a whole lot of trivial fancruft. - 2247:North american box office records. 1447:Official Running Time for Deadpool 455:Then add it somewhere on the page 215:Not really relevant to the article 89:2601:C:780:234:AD23:CD86:6456:C2A9 24: 4106:Legal Issues Surrounding Deadpool 3572:What about the last x men movie? 1797:Come on, It needs to be trimmed. 1029:covered in other parts of body.-- 4939: 4544: 4471: 4448:Better wording might follow the 3896: 3840: 3804: 3745: 3696: 3611: 3578: 3381: 3340: 3286: 2623:This is being discussed over at 2487: 2436: 2322: 2270: 2184: 2120: 1936: 1882: 1821: 1703: 1654: 1588: 1544: 1482: 672:) 21:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC) 565: 552: 29: 5629:This article is about the film 5625:unimportant pointless details. 4529:discussion of the film itself. 4029: 873:does not equal numbers of votes 580:Guardians of the Galaxy (film) 1: 5079:Adequate to material covered. 5065:Adequate to material covered. 5051:Adequate to material covered. 5037:Adequate to material covered. 4101:19:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC) 3460:18:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC) 3446:19:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 3427:18:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 3218:07:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 3203:07:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 3112:17:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC) 3090:21:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 3075:16:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC) 3056:04:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC) 3042:22:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 3027:20:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 3013:05:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 2980:04:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 2871:23:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2831:23:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2810:23:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2781:23:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2738:23:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2713:22:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2698:22:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2682:17:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2661:23:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 2617:23:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 2586:21:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 2571:21:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 2553:21:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 2537:17:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC) 2505:23:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 2478:23:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC) 2423:21:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 2408:02:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC) 2387:04:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2362:22:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2341:01:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2315:01:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2289:01:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2264:00:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC) 2219:00:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC) 2179:23:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2107:23:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2092:23:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 2065:22:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC) 1916:13:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 1876:12:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 1809:19:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC) 1781:04:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC) 1761:18:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 1747:16:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 1722:05:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 1697:04:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 1677:00:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC) 1648:23:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC) 1362:10:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC) 1327:02:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC) 1304:23:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1290:23:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1273:22:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1249:22:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1230:21:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1195:21:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1167:21:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1137:20:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1102:20:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1068:19:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1055:19:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1039:19:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 1019:19:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC) 885:00:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC) 867:00:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 841:20:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC) 819:19:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC) 789:18:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC) 758:00:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC) 734:17:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC) 706:16:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC) 682:21:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC) 646:15:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 611:20:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 592:17:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC) 542:13:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC) 293:, the link no longer exists. 97:03:55, 12 December 2014 (UTC) 87:need to be sourced properly. 4148:23:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 4133:19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 4071:04:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC) 4035:04:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC) 4010:04:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC) 3986:00:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC) 3146:I don't know. This reeks of 2789:. There was a mention of it 2051:21:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 2037:20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC) 2023:20:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 2005:18:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 1985:03:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 1575:17:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 1561:23:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 1540:20:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 1525:18:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 1469:18:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC) 1442:14:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC) 1418:05:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC) 1381:08:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 915:02:52, 04 January 2016 (UTC) 497:04:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 5647:22:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 3867:to reactivate your request. 3855:has been answered. Set the 3723:to reactivate your request. 3711:has been answered. Set the 3601:to reactivate your request. 3589:has been answered. Set the 3313:to reactivate your request. 3301:has been answered. Set the 2463:to reactivate your request. 2451:has been answered. Set the 2352:how it should be presented. 2147:to reactivate your request. 2135:has been answered. Set the 1848:to reactivate your request. 1836:has been answered. Set the 1615:to reactivate your request. 1603:has been answered. Set the 1509:to reactivate your request. 1497:has been answered. Set the 1123:was produced by Lionsgate. 951:23:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 387:here are a couple sources: 217:, but it's fantastic news! 5663: 4259:08:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 4239:06:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 4207:23:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 4191:18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 4168:18:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 4041:Critical reception summary 3664:16:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC) 3631:22:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC) 3547:18:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC) 3532:21:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 3512:20:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 3494:21:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC) 3479:17:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC) 3403:10:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 3377:10:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 3335:09:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC) 3273:17:08, 14 March 2016 (UTC) 3257:20:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC) 3233:23:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC) 1424: 524:X-Men: Days of Future Past 518:Fantastic Four (2015 film) 421:The R-rating does satisfy 355:Blue Is the Warmest Colour 164:21:59, 27 March 2015 (UTC) 154:I'll add him to the page. 145:18:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC) 123:21:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC) 5432:23:45, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5412:22:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5394:14:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5363:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5342:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5327:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 5300:13:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 5235:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5217:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5203:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 5167:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5153:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5139:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 5108:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 5018:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 5004:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4958:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4915:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4900:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4865:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4850:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4835:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4801:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4787:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4755:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4740:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4697:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4683:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4665:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4631:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4617:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4602:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4563:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4539:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4524:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4490:08:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4466:03:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC) 4444:23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4413:13:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4398:07:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4378:02:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 4362:02:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 3960:23:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC) 3935:21:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC) 3921:Good Article Renomination 3182:21:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 3160:21:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 3127:21:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 2847:, and that the character 2766:, and that the character 2295:Cannonball, Garrison Kane 1962:00:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC) 1930:18:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC) 1429:Here's a source on that: 1371:, I guess we can add it? 976:" - Entertainment Weekly 465:20:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 451:07:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 413:04:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 382:04:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 337:02:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 303:02:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 286:00:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 270:00:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 256:00:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 235:22:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC) 209:21:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC) 187:20:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 5614:05:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 5598:00:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 5553:23:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 5535:11:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 5517:05:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 5499:04:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 5481:03:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 5461:01:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 5447:01:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC) 4337:Talk:Deadpool (film)/GA2 3915:22:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC) 3890:15:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC) 3827:19:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 3797:18:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 3771:04:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 3740:04:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC) 3684:14:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 3391:Talk:X-Men (film series) 2987:Ferris Bueller's Day Off 2835:The fact that it spoofs 2787:Ferris Bueller's Day Off 2759:Ferris Bueller's Day Off 2745:Ferris Bueller's Day Off 2633:X-Men Origins: Wolverine 2625:Talk:X-Men (film series) 2601:the x-men film series? 240:Are we sure it's not an 2958:Ferris Bueler's Day Off 475:Citations and archiving 113:in talks for the role? 2643:will be a part of the 2596:Is this an X-Men film? 2256:InsertCleverPhraseHere 1758:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 1459:And it has been used. 1359:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 1301:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 1065:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 1052:SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 994:-Entertainment Weekly 5072:6.2 Critical response 623:clearly stated this: 361:But I'm a Cheerleader 42:of past discussions. 4975:Adequate to section. 3450:Added. Thank You :) 3195:FreeKnowledgeCreator 3063:User:Elisfkc/sandbox 2891:Since Deadpool is a 1993:Knowledge:Notability 687:IMAX Poster released 664:released yesterday. 173:here is the source: 18:Talk:Deadpool (film) 5620:Too detail-oriented 5118:6.4 Industry impact 4879:3.4 Post-production 4076:Genres in film lead 3815:Wikt:operative#Noun 2851:will be featured". 1621:| released = 502:12 Days of Deadpool 5604:to the article. - 4767:3.2 Pre-production 3966:Box Office section 3172:ok, then rewrite. 2841:post-credits scene 2754:post-credits scene 2667:Post Credits Scene 1425:Actor's challenges 1086:Punisher: War Zone 854:there are no rules 83:. Also those last 5419:"R"-rating impact 4327: 4326: 4241: 4225:comment added by 4116:Salt Lake Tribune 4012: 4000:comment added by 3871: 3870: 3799: 3787:comment added by 3769: 3727: 3726: 3666: 3654:comment added by 3605: 3604: 3369: 3366: 3360: 3354: 3317: 3316: 2631:is a spin-off of 2619: 2607:comment added by 2467: 2466: 2317: 2305:comment added by 2217: 2151: 2150: 1960: 1852: 1851: 1626:February 10, 2016 1619: 1618: 1513: 1512: 1421: 1404:comment added by 1282:SuperCarnivore591 1121:Punisher War Zone 1011:SuperCarnivore591 821: 809:comment added by 660:He's seen in the 242:April Fool's joke 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5654: 5583:Closing comments 5381:Star Wars (film) 5352: 5311: 5249:7.1 No Good Deed 4947: 4943: 4942: 4552: 4548: 4547: 4479: 4475: 4474: 4281:Copyvio detector 4269: 4204: 4199: 4125:H McCringleberry 4069: 4066: 4063: 4033: 4031: 4026: 4023: 4021: 3904: 3900: 3899: 3862: 3858: 3844: 3843: 3837: 3812: 3808: 3807: 3757: 3749: 3748: 3732:Perfectionist me 3718: 3714: 3700: 3699: 3693: 3615: 3614: 3596: 3592: 3582: 3581: 3575: 3565:box office quote 3385: 3384: 3373: 3367: 3364: 3358: 3352: 3344: 3343: 3327:CorySelfInvictus 3308: 3304: 3290: 3289: 3283: 3171: 3100: 2820: 2794: 2491: 2490: 2458: 2454: 2440: 2439: 2433: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2278: 2274: 2273: 2262: 2239: 2234: 2211: 2205: 2202: 2199: 2196: 2188: 2187: 2142: 2138: 2124: 2123: 2117: 1948: 1940: 1939: 1912: 1905: 1898: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1843: 1839: 1825: 1824: 1818: 1754:Darkwarriorblake 1711: 1707: 1706: 1662: 1658: 1657: 1633: 1631: 1610: 1606: 1592: 1591: 1585: 1554:reliable sources 1548: 1547: 1517:End yourself kid 1504: 1500: 1486: 1485: 1479: 1420: 1398: 1355:Darkwarriorblake 1297:Darkwarriorblake 1061:Darkwarriorblake 1048:Darkwarriorblake 929: 925: 833: 772: 746: 726: 716: 617:User:Favre1fan93 572: 569: 568: 559: 556: 555: 549:WP:FILMMARKETING 513:User:Favre1fan93 379: 370: 321: 312: 232: 223: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5662: 5661: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5622: 5585: 5346: 5305: 4940: 4938: 4711:3.1 Development 4545: 4543: 4472: 4470: 4331:This review is 4323: 4295: 4267: 4217: 4202: 4197: 4179:reliable source 4156: 4108: 4078: 4067: 4064: 4061: 4043: 3968: 3923: 3897: 3895: 3860: 3856: 3853:Deadpool (film) 3841: 3835: 3805: 3803: 3779: 3746: 3716: 3712: 3709:Deadpool (film) 3697: 3691: 3672: 3639: 3629: 3612: 3594: 3590: 3579: 3567: 3411: 3382: 3372: 3363: 3357: 3351: 3341: 3306: 3302: 3299:Deadpool (film) 3287: 3281: 3240: 3190: 3165: 3094: 2968: 2814: 2790: 2669: 2598: 2513: 2488: 2456: 2452: 2449:Deadpool (film) 2437: 2431: 2395: 2393:Andre Tricoteux 2349: 2347:Opening credits 2323: 2321: 2297: 2271: 2269: 2252: 2249: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2235: 2231: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2185: 2171:Trumpsashithead 2140: 2136: 2133:Deadpool (film) 2121: 2115: 2079: 1970: 1937: 1908: 1901: 1894: 1883: 1881: 1841: 1837: 1834:Deadpool (film) 1822: 1816: 1788: 1769: 1730: 1704: 1702: 1685: 1655: 1653: 1637: 1629: 1627: 1608: 1604: 1601:Deadpool (film) 1589: 1583: 1581:uk release date 1552:please provide 1545: 1502: 1498: 1495:Deadpool (film) 1483: 1477: 1449: 1427: 1399: 1389: 958: 938: 936:Archiving links 933: 932: 926: 922: 827: 766: 740: 720: 710: 689: 658: 570: 566: 557: 553: 504: 477: 435:my home country 373: 366: 315: 308: 226: 219: 194: 171: 152: 130: 107: 77: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5660: 5658: 5650: 5649: 5621: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5584: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5576: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5572: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5568: 5567: 5566: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5468:Adventure Time 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5279: 5278: 5277:7.3 Deadpool 3 5274: 5273: 5272: 5271: 5265: 5264: 5263:7.2 Deadpool 2 5260: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5251: 5250: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5183: 5182: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5120: 5119: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5088: 5087: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5074: 5073: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5060: 5059: 5058:6.1 Box office 5055: 5054: 5053: 5052: 5046: 5045: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5032: 5031: 5030:5.2 Home media 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 4984: 4983: 4979: 4978: 4977: 4976: 4970: 4969: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4929: 4928: 4924: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4881: 4880: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4815: 4814: 4810: 4809: 4808: 4807: 4806: 4805: 4804: 4803: 4777:See bottom. - 4769: 4768: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4713: 4712: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4647: 4646: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4579: 4578: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4506: 4505: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4420: 4419: 4401: 4400: 4366: 4342: 4341: 4325: 4324: 4322: 4321: 4316: 4311: 4305: 4302: 4301: 4297: 4296: 4294: 4293: 4291:External links 4288: 4283: 4277: 4274: 4273: 4266: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4251:TriiipleThreat 4216: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4160:84.212.111.156 4155: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4140:TriiipleThreat 4120:expert witness 4107: 4104: 4093:TriiipleThreat 4077: 4074: 4042: 4039: 4038: 4037: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3967: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3922: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3882:86.132.192.183 3869: 3868: 3845: 3834: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3819:TriiipleThreat 3781:See subject. 3778: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3725: 3724: 3701: 3690: 3687: 3671: 3668: 3638: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3623: 3603: 3602: 3583: 3566: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3410: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3387:Also Not done: 3379: 3370: 3361: 3355: 3315: 3314: 3291: 3280: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3239: 3236: 3221: 3220: 3189: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3168:TriiipleThreat 3152:TriiipleThreat 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 2902:Adventure Time 2897:X-Men Universe 2890: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2837:Ferris Buelker 2798:Ferris Bueller 2668: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2482: 2470:69.121.136.113 2465: 2464: 2441: 2430: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2394: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2248: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2165: 2149: 2148: 2125: 2114: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2078: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2039: 1969: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1850: 1849: 1826: 1815: 1812: 1787: 1784: 1773:Marky Guerrero 1768: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1665:WP:FILMRELEASE 1636: 1635: 1623: 1617: 1616: 1593: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1563: 1542: 1511: 1510: 1487: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1448: 1445: 1426: 1423: 1394: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1187:TriiipleThreat 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1159:TriiipleThreat 1155:WP:FILMRATINGS 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1042: 1041: 1031:TriiipleThreat 1026:WP:FILMRATINGS 957: 954: 937: 934: 931: 930: 919: 918: 902: 901: 900: 899: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 859:TriiipleThreat 844: 843: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 737: 736: 688: 685: 657: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 633: 632: 631: 503: 500: 476: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 423:WP:FILMRATINGS 416: 415: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 193: 190: 170: 167: 151: 148: 129: 126: 106: 103: 101: 76: 73: 70: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5659: 5648: 5644: 5640: 5636: 5632: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5619: 5615: 5611: 5607: 5602: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5595: 5591: 5582: 5554: 5550: 5546: 5542: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5532: 5528: 5524: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5514: 5510: 5506: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5496: 5492: 5488: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5478: 5474: 5470: 5469: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5444: 5440: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5429: 5425: 5420: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5409: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5391: 5387: 5382: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5350: 5345: 5344: 5343: 5339: 5335: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5324: 5320: 5316: 5309: 5304: 5303: 5302: 5301: 5297: 5293: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5276: 5275: 5269: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5262: 5261: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5248: 5247: 5236: 5232: 5228: 5224: 5220: 5219: 5218: 5214: 5210: 5206: 5205: 5204: 5200: 5196: 5191: 5190: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5180: 5179: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5127: 5124: 5123: 5122: 5121: 5117: 5116: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5096: 5095: 5092: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5086:6.3 Accolades 5085: 5084: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5071: 5070: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5057: 5056: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5043: 5042: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5029: 5028: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4992: 4991: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4982:5.1 Marketing 4981: 4980: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4967: 4966: 4959: 4955: 4951: 4946: 4937: 4936: 4933: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4926: 4925: 4916: 4912: 4908: 4903: 4902: 4901: 4897: 4893: 4889: 4888: 4885: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4878: 4877: 4866: 4862: 4858: 4853: 4852: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4823: 4822: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4812: 4811: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4789: 4788: 4784: 4780: 4776: 4775: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4766: 4765: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4728:Green Lantern 4725: 4724: 4722: 4721:Green Lantern 4717: 4716: 4715: 4714: 4710: 4709: 4698: 4694: 4690: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4662: 4658: 4654: 4653: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4644: 4643: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4614: 4610: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4599: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4586: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4576: 4575: 4564: 4560: 4556: 4551: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4521: 4517: 4513: 4512: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4503: 4502: 4491: 4487: 4483: 4478: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4451: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4428: 4427: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4410: 4406: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4364: 4363: 4359: 4356: 4353: 4349: 4346: 4340: 4338: 4334: 4329: 4328: 4320: 4317: 4315: 4312: 4310: 4307: 4306: 4304: 4303: 4298: 4292: 4289: 4287: 4284: 4282: 4279: 4278: 4276: 4275: 4270: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4215:"Comedy" film 4214: 4208: 4205: 4200: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4172: 4171: 4170: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4153: 4149: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4121: 4117: 4114: 4105: 4103: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4075: 4073: 4072: 4058: 4056: 4052: 4048: 4040: 4036: 4032: 4022: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4011: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3987: 3983: 3979: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3956: 3951: 3950: 3945: 3944: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3903: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3880: 3875: 3866: 3863:parameter to 3854: 3850: 3846: 3839: 3838: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3811: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3798: 3794: 3790: 3789:174.44.50.108 3786: 3776: 3772: 3767: 3764: 3761: 3756: 3752: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3722: 3719:parameter to 3710: 3706: 3702: 3695: 3694: 3688: 3686: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3669: 3667: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3656:69.26.123.132 3653: 3646: 3644: 3636: 3632: 3627: 3622: 3618: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3600: 3597:parameter to 3588: 3584: 3577: 3576: 3573: 3570: 3564: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3539:Pistongrinder 3535: 3534: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3520: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3504:Pistongrinder 3501: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3471:Pistongrinder 3467: 3464:But here's a 3463: 3462: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3380: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3347: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3312: 3309:parameter to 3300: 3296: 3292: 3285: 3284: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3265:Pistongrinder 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3244: 3237: 3235: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3169: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3098: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3065: 3064: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3004: 3003: 2998: 2997: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2966: 2965: 2960: 2959: 2954: 2950: 2949: 2944: 2943: 2938: 2937: 2932: 2931: 2926: 2925: 2924:Green Lantern 2920: 2919: 2914: 2913: 2912:The Lion King 2908: 2904: 2903: 2898: 2894: 2893:metafictional 2889: 2872: 2868: 2867: 2862: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2818: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2799: 2793: 2788: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2729: 2728: 2723: 2722: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2595: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2462: 2459:parameter to 2450: 2446: 2442: 2435: 2434: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2383: 2378: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2354:Pistongrinder 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2329: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307:45.72.159.179 2304: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2277: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2246: 2238: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2220: 2215: 2210: 2207: 2206: 2191: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2163: 2160: 2157: 2154: 2146: 2143:parameter to 2134: 2130: 2126: 2119: 2118: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2076: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2057:Pistongrinder 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029:Pistongrinder 2027:Good to know. 2026: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2011:WP:FILMRATING 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1997:Pistongrinder 1994: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1955: 1952: 1947: 1943: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922:DangerMouseMA 1919: 1918: 1917: 1914: 1913: 1911: 1906: 1904: 1899: 1897: 1889: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1868:194.69.104.60 1865: 1861: 1860:Summary frame 1857: 1847: 1844:parameter to 1835: 1831: 1827: 1820: 1819: 1813: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1785: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1689:Royalcourtier 1682: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1625: 1624: 1622: 1614: 1611:parameter to 1602: 1598: 1594: 1587: 1586: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567:Pistongrinder 1564: 1562: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1508: 1505:parameter to 1496: 1492: 1488: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1422: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1395: 1392: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1007: 1005: 1001: 1000:- Moviepilot 999: 995: 993: 989: 987: 983: 981: 977: 975: 971: 968: 966: 962: 955: 953: 952: 948: 944: 935: 928: 924: 921: 917: 916: 912: 908: 907:Burningblue52 896: 895: 894: 893: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 868: 864: 860: 855: 851: 848: 847: 846: 845: 842: 838: 834: 832: 831: 824: 823: 822: 820: 816: 812: 811:206.81.136.61 808: 790: 786: 782: 777: 770: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 755: 751: 744: 739: 738: 735: 731: 727: 725: 724: 714: 709: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694: 693: 686: 684: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 655: 647: 643: 639: 634: 629: 625: 624: 622: 618: 614: 613: 612: 608: 604: 600: 595: 594: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 563: 550: 546: 545: 544: 543: 539: 535: 531: 526: 525: 520: 519: 514: 509: 501: 499: 498: 494: 490: 484: 482: 481:WP:OVERCITING 474: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 429:is the first 428: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 383: 380: 377: 371: 369: 363: 362: 357: 356: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 319: 313: 311: 306: 305: 304: 300: 296: 292: 289: 288: 287: 283: 279: 276: 273: 272: 271: 267: 263: 259: 258: 257: 253: 249: 245: 243: 238: 237: 236: 233: 230: 224: 222: 216: 213: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 199: 191: 189: 188: 184: 180: 176: 168: 166: 165: 161: 157: 149: 147: 146: 142: 138: 135: 127: 125: 124: 120: 116: 112: 104: 102: 99: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 74: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5630: 5623: 5586: 5540: 5504: 5486: 5466: 5418: 5399: 5380: 5289: 4944: 4727: 4720: 4645:3 Production 4549: 4476: 4418:Lead section 4402: 4385: 4365: 4354: 4344: 4343: 4330: 4319:Instructions 4221:— Preceding 4218: 4198:Sergecross73 4157: 4109: 4084: 4079: 4059: 4054: 4050: 4047:source cited 4044: 3996:— Preceding 3992: 3978:24.69.100.27 3969: 3954: 3948: 3942: 3924: 3901: 3876: 3872: 3864: 3849:edit request 3809: 3783:— Preceding 3780: 3762: 3750: 3728: 3720: 3705:edit request 3673: 3650:— Preceding 3647: 3640: 3616: 3606: 3598: 3587:edit request 3571: 3568: 3518: 3466:direct quote 3412: 3409:Helicarrier? 3386: 3350: 3345: 3325: 3318: 3310: 3295:edit request 3245: 3241: 3238:Plot: cancer 3222: 3191: 3188:Plot section 3145: 3061: 3007: 3001: 2995: 2969: 2962: 2956: 2946: 2940: 2934: 2928: 2922: 2916: 2910: 2900: 2887: 2865: 2859: 2853: 2844: 2836: 2797: 2786: 2763: 2757: 2743: 2732: 2726: 2720: 2670: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2603:— Preceding 2599: 2558: 2520: 2517:the Workshop 2516: 2514: 2492: 2481: 2468: 2460: 2445:edit request 2396: 2381: 2375: 2369: 2350: 2327: 2301:— Preceding 2298: 2275: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2232: 2224: 2193: 2189: 2169: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2156:should read 2155: 2152: 2144: 2129:edit request 2080: 2009:Please note 1971: 1953: 1941: 1909: 1902: 1895: 1892: 1887: 1863: 1859: 1853: 1845: 1830:edit request 1799: 1796: 1793: 1789: 1770: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1708: 1686: 1659: 1640:Gamereaper95 1638: 1620: 1612: 1597:edit request 1549: 1514: 1506: 1491:edit request 1461:Kailash29792 1450: 1428: 1400:— Preceding 1396: 1393: 1390: 1387:Release date 1373:Kailash29792 1351: 1255: 1235: 1120: 1085: 1008: 1002: 996: 990: 988:-Screenrant 984: 978: 972: 969: 964: 959: 956:Movie Rating 939: 923: 903: 850:SuperHotWiki 829: 828: 805:— Preceding 801: 781:SuperHotWiki 722: 721: 690: 659: 638:SuperHotWiki 627: 603:SuperHotWiki 598: 575: 561: 534:SuperHotWiki 522: 516: 505: 485: 478: 443:Kailash29792 438: 430: 426: 375: 367: 359: 353: 351: 324: 323:It actually 317: 309: 239: 228: 220: 195: 172: 153: 131: 110: 108: 100: 78: 60: 43: 37: 5590:JohnWickTwo 5527:JohnWickTwo 5491:JohnWickTwo 5453:JohnWickTwo 5424:JohnWickTwo 5386:JohnWickTwo 5349:JohnWickTwo 5334:JohnWickTwo 5308:JohnWickTwo 5292:JohnWickTwo 5209:JohnWickTwo 5145:JohnWickTwo 5044:6 Reception 5010:JohnWickTwo 4907:JohnWickTwo 4842:JohnWickTwo 4825:section. - 4813:3.3 Filming 4793:JohnWickTwo 4747:JohnWickTwo 4675:JohnWickTwo 4609:JohnWickTwo 4590:WP:FILMCAST 4531:JohnWickTwo 4458:JohnWickTwo 4454:fourth wall 4405:JohnWickTwo 4370:JohnWickTwo 4348:JohnWickTwo 4333:transcluded 4247:WP:FILMLEAD 4081:WP:FILMLEAD 3877:Could cite 3500:Helicarrier 3415:Helicarrier 3097:Adamstom.97 2817:Adamstom.97 2077:"Weapon X"? 2015:Cyphoidbomb 1669:Favre1fan93 1558:allthefoxes 1241:Favre1fan93 961:Favre1fan93 877:Favre1fan93 776:Favre1fan93 750:Favre1fan93 713:Favre1fan93 698:Favre1fan93 615:Looks like 599:Cloverfield 584:Favre1fan93 291:ZeEnergizer 278:ZeEnergizer 262:Favre1fan93 248:Favre1fan93 196:Here's the 36:This is an 5639:adamstom97 5606:adamstom97 5545:adamstom97 5509:adamstom97 5473:adamstom97 5439:adamstom97 5404:adamstom97 5355:adamstom97 5319:adamstom97 5227:adamstom97 5223:WP:CRYSTAL 5195:adamstom97 5159:adamstom97 5131:adamstom97 5100:adamstom97 4996:adamstom97 4950:adamstom97 4892:adamstom97 4857:adamstom97 4827:adamstom97 4779:adamstom97 4732:adamstom97 4689:adamstom97 4671:filmmaking 4657:adamstom97 4623:adamstom97 4594:adamstom97 4555:adamstom97 4516:adamstom97 4482:adamstom97 4436:adamstom97 4390:adamstom97 4286:Authorship 4272:GA toolbox 4227:Widgetsz89 4183:DonQuixote 4020:N. GASIETA 3907:adamstom97 3857:|answered= 3713:|answered= 3670:GA nominee 3591:|answered= 3524:adamstom97 3486:adamstom97 3395:adamstom97 3303:|answered= 3210:adamstom97 3082:adamstom97 3034:adamstom97 2942:Mrs. Magoo 2773:adamstom97 2705:adamstom97 2653:adamstom97 2578:adamstom97 2545:adamstom97 2453:|answered= 2415:adamstom97 2333:adamstom97 2281:adamstom97 2225:References 2137:|answered= 1838:|answered= 1630:2016-02-10 1605:|answered= 1499:|answered= 1406:Hypohamish 1280:it first. 779:infobox.-- 105:Ed Skerin? 5505:Star Wars 5181:7 Sequels 4968:5 Release 4345:Reviewer: 4309:Templates 4300:Reviewing 4265:GA Review 3927:DrkBlueXG 3617:Not done: 3452:DrkBlueXG 3436:for you. 3432:here's a 3419:DrkBlueXG 3346:Not done: 3225:Cowcharge 3148:WP:TRIVIA 2948:Daredevil 2936:127 Hours 2918:Star Wars 2674:DrkBlueXG 2649:Star Wars 2645:Star Wars 2641:Rogue One 2493:Not done: 2212:Please {{ 1968:Cut scene 1942:Not done: 1866:section. 1801:DrkBlueXG 1739:DrkBlueXG 1550:Not done: 1532:JMcGowan2 852:is right 830:Steel1943 769:Steel1943 743:Steel1943 723:Steel1943 132:Here's a 85:http://'s 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 5631:Deadpool 5541:Deadpool 5487:Deadpool 5400:Deadpool 5315:MOS:FILM 4450:Deadpool 4386:Deadpool 4358:contribs 4314:Criteria 4235:contribs 4223:unsigned 4055:Deadpool 4051:Deadpool 3998:unsigned 3943:Snuggums 3902:Not done 3810:Not done 3785:unsigned 3676:Tenebrae 3652:unsigned 3519:Deadpool 3469:article. 3438:Npamusic 2996:Snuggums 2964:Iron Man 2854:Snuggums 2845:Deadpool 2764:Deadpool 2721:Snuggums 2688:summary. 2629:Deadpool 2605:unsigned 2563:Npamusic 2529:Npamusic 2525:source 1 2497:Cannolis 2370:Snuggums 2303:unsigned 2099:Npamusic 2084:Npamusic 2043:Hula Hup 1977:Hula Hup 1888:Not done 1864:Starring 1714:Tenebrae 1660:Not done 1434:Hula Hup 1414:contribs 1402:unsigned 1256:Deadpool 982:-Forbes 943:Tenebrae 807:unsigned 674:Npamusic 666:Npamusic 621:MOS:Film 530:MOS:Film 508:MOS:Film 489:Tenebrae 479:We have 457:Npamusic 427:Deadpool 405:Npamusic 401:source 4 397:source 3 393:source 2 389:source 1 329:Npamusic 295:Npamusic 201:Npamusic 179:Npamusic 175:source 1 156:Npamusic 137:Npamusic 115:Npamusic 4927:4 Music 4432:WP:LEAD 4173:Please 3174:Elisfkc 3119:Elisfkc 3104:Elisfkc 3067:Elisfkc 3048:Elisfkc 3019:Elisfkc 2972:Elisfkc 2907:Gandalf 2823:Elisfkc 2802:Elisfkc 2521:clearly 1683:Torture 1369:rated R 1323:contrib 1315:Erik II 1269:contrib 1261:Erik II 1226:contrib 1218:Erik II 1133:contrib 1125:Erik II 1098:contrib 1090:Erik II 898:stated. 857:film.-- 662:TV Spot 506:Though 39:archive 4577:2 Cast 4504:1 Plot 4203:msg me 3813:, see 3755:JJMC89 3621:clpo13 3434:source 3249:Canute 2951:, and 2209:(talk) 1946:JJMC89 1236:wasn't 198:source 134:source 81:source 4335:from 3955:edits 3861:|ans= 3847:This 3717:|ans= 3703:This 3595:|ans= 3585:This 3537:fine. 3307:|ans= 3293:This 3008:edits 2991:Cable 2930:Taken 2866:edits 2849:Cable 2768:Cable 2750:Cable 2733:edits 2690:Dibol 2637:X-Men 2457:|ans= 2443:This 2400:JDDJS 2382:edits 2141:|ans= 2127:This 1903:Under 1896:Crash 1858:) in 1842:|ans= 1828:This 1609:|ans= 1595:This 1503:|ans= 1489:This 1006:-IGN 431:X-Men 378:talk) 320:talk) 244:? And 231:talk) 111:still 16:< 5643:talk 5637:. - 5635:here 5610:talk 5594:talk 5549:talk 5531:talk 5513:talk 5495:talk 5477:talk 5457:talk 5443:talk 5428:talk 5408:talk 5390:talk 5359:talk 5338:talk 5323:talk 5296:talk 5231:talk 5213:talk 5199:talk 5163:talk 5149:talk 5135:talk 5104:talk 5014:talk 5000:talk 4954:talk 4945:Done 4911:talk 4896:talk 4861:talk 4846:talk 4831:talk 4797:talk 4783:talk 4751:talk 4736:talk 4693:talk 4679:talk 4661:talk 4627:talk 4613:talk 4598:talk 4559:talk 4550:Done 4535:talk 4520:talk 4486:talk 4477:Done 4462:talk 4440:talk 4434:. - 4409:talk 4394:talk 4374:talk 4352:talk 4255:talk 4231:talk 4187:talk 4175:cite 4164:talk 4144:talk 4129:talk 4097:talk 4045:The 4030:talk 4006:talk 3982:talk 3949:talk 3931:talk 3911:talk 3886:talk 3823:talk 3793:talk 3751:Done 3736:talk 3680:talk 3660:talk 3626:talk 3543:talk 3528:talk 3508:talk 3490:talk 3475:talk 3456:talk 3442:talk 3423:talk 3399:talk 3331:talk 3269:talk 3253:talk 3229:talk 3214:talk 3199:talk 3178:talk 3156:talk 3123:talk 3108:talk 3086:talk 3071:talk 3052:talk 3038:talk 3023:talk 3002:talk 2976:talk 2961:and 2953:IKEA 2860:talk 2827:talk 2806:talk 2792:here 2777:talk 2727:talk 2709:talk 2694:talk 2678:talk 2657:talk 2613:talk 2582:talk 2567:talk 2549:talk 2533:talk 2501:talk 2474:talk 2419:talk 2404:talk 2376:talk 2358:talk 2337:talk 2328:Done 2311:talk 2285:talk 2276:Done 2190:Done 2175:talk 2103:talk 2088:talk 2061:talk 2047:talk 2033:talk 2019:talk 2001:talk 1981:talk 1926:talk 1910:ride 1872:talk 1805:talk 1777:talk 1743:talk 1718:talk 1709:Done 1693:talk 1673:talk 1667:. - 1663:Per 1644:talk 1634:(UK) 1571:talk 1536:talk 1521:talk 1465:talk 1438:talk 1410:talk 1377:talk 1319:talk 1286:talk 1265:talk 1245:talk 1222:talk 1191:talk 1163:talk 1129:talk 1117:This 1094:talk 1082:This 1035:talk 1015:talk 947:talk 911:talk 881:talk 875:. - 863:talk 837:talk 815:talk 785:talk 754:talk 730:talk 702:talk 678:talk 670:talk 642:talk 607:talk 588:talk 576:then 547:Per 538:talk 521:and 493:talk 461:talk 447:talk 409:talk 376:tock 368:Sock 333:talk 318:tock 310:Sock 299:talk 282:talk 266:talk 252:talk 229:tock 221:Sock 205:talk 183:talk 160:talk 141:talk 119:talk 93:talk 4085:the 4068:PhD 4065:mer 4062:Sum 3859:or 3851:to 3817:.-- 3715:or 3707:to 3593:or 3305:or 3297:to 2455:or 2447:to 2204:Fir 2201:een 2198:rgr 2195:Eve 2139:or 2131:to 1862:in 1840:or 1832:to 1607:or 1599:to 1501:or 1493:to 1325:) 1271:) 1228:) 1135:) 1100:) 965:has 601:.-- 358:or 5645:) 5612:) 5596:) 5551:) 5533:) 5515:) 5497:) 5479:) 5459:) 5445:) 5430:) 5410:) 5392:) 5361:) 5340:) 5325:) 5298:) 5233:) 5215:) 5201:) 5165:) 5151:) 5137:) 5106:) 5016:) 5002:) 4956:) 4948:- 4913:) 4898:) 4863:) 4848:) 4833:) 4799:) 4785:) 4753:) 4738:) 4695:) 4681:) 4663:) 4629:) 4615:) 4600:) 4561:) 4553:- 4537:) 4522:) 4488:) 4480:- 4464:) 4442:) 4411:) 4396:) 4376:) 4360:) 4257:) 4237:) 4233:• 4189:) 4181:. 4177:a 4166:) 4146:) 4131:) 4123:-- 4113:AP 4099:) 4008:) 3984:) 3958:) 3952:/ 3933:) 3913:) 3888:) 3865:no 3825:) 3795:) 3753:— 3738:) 3721:no 3682:) 3662:) 3599:no 3545:) 3530:) 3510:) 3492:) 3477:) 3458:) 3444:) 3425:) 3401:) 3371:S 3368:E 3365:A 3362:S 3359:K 3356:C 3353:E 3333:) 3311:no 3271:) 3255:) 3231:) 3216:) 3201:) 3180:) 3158:) 3125:) 3110:) 3088:) 3073:) 3054:) 3040:) 3025:) 3011:) 3005:/ 2978:) 2967:. 2945:, 2939:, 2933:, 2927:, 2921:, 2915:, 2909:, 2905:, 2869:) 2863:/ 2829:) 2808:) 2779:) 2736:) 2730:/ 2711:) 2696:) 2680:) 2659:) 2615:) 2584:) 2569:) 2551:) 2535:) 2503:) 2476:) 2461:no 2421:) 2406:) 2385:) 2379:/ 2360:) 2339:) 2331:- 2313:) 2287:) 2279:- 2216:}} 2214:re 2177:) 2145:no 2105:) 2090:) 2063:) 2049:) 2035:) 2021:) 2013:. 2003:) 1983:) 1975:. 1944:— 1928:) 1874:) 1846:no 1807:) 1779:) 1756:/ 1745:) 1720:) 1695:) 1675:) 1646:) 1613:no 1573:) 1538:) 1523:) 1507:no 1467:) 1440:) 1432:. 1416:) 1412:• 1379:) 1357:/ 1321:| 1299:/ 1288:) 1267:| 1247:) 1224:| 1193:) 1165:) 1131:| 1096:| 1088:. 1063:/ 1050:/ 1037:) 1017:) 949:) 941:-- 913:} 883:) 865:) 839:) 817:) 787:) 756:) 732:) 704:) 680:) 644:) 609:) 590:) 540:) 495:) 487:-- 463:) 449:) 439:X3 437:, 411:) 403:. 399:. 395:, 391:, 335:) 325:is 301:) 284:) 268:) 254:) 207:) 185:) 177:. 162:) 143:) 121:) 95:) 5641:( 5608:( 5592:( 5547:( 5529:( 5511:( 5493:( 5475:( 5455:( 5441:( 5426:( 5406:( 5388:( 5357:( 5351:: 5347:@ 5336:( 5321:( 5310:: 5306:@ 5294:( 5229:( 5211:( 5197:( 5161:( 5147:( 5133:( 5102:( 5012:( 4998:( 4952:( 4909:( 4894:( 4859:( 4844:( 4829:( 4795:( 4781:( 4749:( 4734:( 4691:( 4677:( 4659:( 4625:( 4611:( 4596:( 4557:( 4533:( 4518:( 4484:( 4460:( 4438:( 4407:( 4392:( 4372:( 4355:· 4350:( 4253:( 4229:( 4185:( 4162:( 4142:( 4127:( 4095:( 4025:| 4004:( 3980:( 3946:( 3929:( 3909:( 3884:( 3821:( 3791:( 3768:) 3766:C 3763:· 3760:T 3758:( 3734:( 3678:( 3658:( 3628:) 3624:( 3541:( 3526:( 3506:( 3488:( 3473:( 3454:( 3440:( 3421:( 3397:( 3329:( 3267:( 3251:( 3227:( 3212:( 3197:( 3176:( 3170:: 3166:@ 3154:( 3121:( 3106:( 3099:: 3095:@ 3084:( 3069:( 3050:( 3036:( 3021:( 2999:( 2974:( 2857:( 2825:( 2819:: 2815:@ 2804:( 2775:( 2724:( 2707:( 2692:( 2676:( 2655:( 2611:( 2580:( 2565:( 2547:( 2531:( 2499:( 2472:( 2417:( 2402:( 2373:( 2356:( 2335:( 2309:( 2283:( 2173:( 2101:( 2086:( 2059:( 2045:( 2031:( 2017:( 1999:( 1979:( 1959:) 1957:C 1954:· 1951:T 1949:( 1924:( 1870:( 1803:( 1775:( 1741:( 1716:( 1691:( 1671:( 1642:( 1632:) 1628:( 1569:( 1534:( 1519:( 1463:( 1436:( 1408:( 1375:( 1317:( 1284:( 1263:( 1243:( 1220:( 1189:( 1161:( 1127:( 1092:( 1033:( 1013:( 945:( 909:{ 879:( 861:( 835:( 813:( 783:( 771:: 767:@ 752:( 745:: 741:@ 728:( 715:: 711:@ 700:( 676:( 668:( 640:( 630:" 605:( 586:( 571:Y 560:" 558:Y 536:( 491:( 459:( 445:( 407:( 374:( 331:( 316:( 297:( 280:( 264:( 250:( 227:( 203:( 181:( 158:( 139:( 117:( 91:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index