Talk:Democratic Party (United States)/Archive 11

766:

most closely associated with the Democrats-- but the problem with that is that the Democrats don't identify as the left: there are Centrists, Conservatives, and Libertarians in addition to Liberals and Progressives. To say "Left" is to make a broad generalization of the Democrats. The Republicans are becoming more ideologically pure, but that doesn't include the number of Centrists still in their party (Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins are excellent examples, as is Jeb Bush). Both are big-tent parties that embrace multiple ideologies historically and aren't ideologically pure, like European parties are. They work with multiple viewpoints (on abortion, there are GOP members in favor, and Democrats who oppose, for example). There's a lot of justification behind just removing the field altogether, in addition to the fact that finding compromise is what we should all aim for as Knowledge (XXG) editors.

2420:

Party (United States)" under the assumption that "Democratic Party" was the proper name of the party, but it is, as is evidenced by the Party's charter, not. We don't label the article for the SPD as "Social Democratic Party (Germany)," but rather the full name "Social Democratic Party of Germany" is used, because that is the proper name of the party and it requires no disambiguation. The naming conventions suggest that the name of the country in parenthesis is to be added where the names of parties are identical to the names of other parties, but we have here a case where, while the common name is ambiguous, the official name is not. Since the official name of the party is unambiguous, that removes the need to use the parenthesized country name because there is no other political party in the world named the "Democratic Party of the United States of America." --

363:(following what OrangeMike and Toa said) The Republicans used to be the less conservative party historically, especially with Teddy Roosevelt and trust-busting during the Progressive Era. It was only with the Civil Rights Era that the South finally began shifting away from the Democrats to the Republicans. This is mirrored in the Northeast which saw fewer Moderate Republicans, whose place was taken by more left-leaning Democrats (Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe are holdovers of this tradition). This partially explains how the parties slowly switched ideologies over the course of 50 years. It's justified that the Democrats can show up in the watchlist you were talking about (plus the fact that Blue Dogs are considered somewhat conservative in the American political spectrum). 743:. That solves the issue of the range on the spectrum that the Republicans by their inclusion in the IDU endorse; the issue of the Democrats' positio should be solved by users by similarly seeking out sources of where the Democratic Party is located on the left-right spectrum. It is true that the left-right spectrum is limited in describing politics, but saying that it has no bearing on American politics is hyperbole, the left-right spectrum is mentioned all the time in American politics. I fear that users here are resorting to deleting any mention of the left-right spectrum out of frustration with past discussions on the issue of the spectrum, rather than seeking to find its position or general range of position on the spectrum.-- 2305:

industries becoming at least subsidized by the state. Examples of a social democratic ideology include but are not limited to an expansion and improvement of public education, a path towards free or subsidized higher education, subsidized or state-controlled health care, and state-subsidized farms. Social Democrats include Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Dennis Kucinich, and at one time Bernie Sanders. The Democratic Party contains people not just in the centre-left, but people from the center all the way to the left wing, and is a political party that seems more like an alliance of people with leftist beliefs. Therefore, "social democrats" should be included in the ideology as well as in the voter base of the party.

3508:, and for the two sources cited, one is horribly outdated (1978) and speculative, and the other does not assert that the Democratic Party is socially democratic; it merely speculates that the future of the country is socially democratic and talks about Obamacare. And regardless, we should not remove mention of a label (Third Way) based on insinuation and speculation that another label might apply (social democrat). If you can show that reliable sources predominately refute the "Third Way" label, then by all means, bring that evidence here and we can change the article. Otherwise, the current sources and material remain valid. – 3163: 1530: 1941: 572:-- The concept of "left" and "right" insofar as politics is concerned is completely meaningless. Anyone arguing as if there is some substantial truth in calling someone or something "to the right" or "to the left" doesn't really understand politics at all. My opinion? The Democrats and Republicans are both right wing parties with the democrats being closer to the "center" than the Republicans. I'm sure I could find sources supporting that view too. So, it is probably more honest and encyclopedic to abandon this terminology altogether. 794:, where every so often someone would drive up and change it to center-left and then sometime later someone else would change it to left-left and someone later back to center-left, etc etc etc. The best resolution/consensus, IMO, is if the field was removed from the template altogether. This would apply to the Democratic Party, GOP infobox, Green Party, etc etc etc, and then let the citations in the articles present how some authorities feel the Democratic Party (in this case) is center-left while others feel it is left-left, etc. 2714:, saying "this is a full-fledged article and not a directory; links are normal Wiki role". Well, duh, of course this is a full-fledged article, with now restored a directory of parties--not a set of "See also" like links. The latter is appropriate, the former is not. In addition, "links are normal Wiki role" is a bit hard to parse, but no, such a collection of links is not normal, and if it is it shouldn't be. Anyway, I'm bringing this here for discussion. Thanks. 31: 266:

more successful than their liberal counterparts in these primaries" ; " Consequently, many conservative Democrats backed local conservative Democrats while simultaneously supporting Republican presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, and George" ; "Given the substantial numbers of conservative Democrats remaining active in the southern Democratic Party organizations..." ; "Obama Falls Short Among Conservative Democrats" .

911: 3119: 2511: 1897: 1429: 790:

editors and by authors from reliable sources alike, that it just has no place in an infobox. To add insult to injury, even if each human being on Earth agreed today that the Democratic Party is, say, center-left, it is bound to fluctuate and be considered left-left in a few weeks, just to bounce back to center-left again in a few more weeks/months, etc. I had the same problem with the

1398:

suggests that the Democratic Party began in 1860, which is NOT the case. There needs to be an effort to better define the existing text (and make it more proportional to the actual history of the party. I would suggest dividing it into the following categories: Early history, 1824-1860, the Civil War, 1868-1932, 1932-1964, Modern Era, but I'm not an expert in this field. Suggestions?

2733:-- it does not mention web pages and specifically recommends links to Wiki articles, which is what we have here. Editors put a lot of work in this and simply erasing annoys them and deprives users of useful information. No one benefits. With them included, "Knowledge (XXG) functions as an index or directory of its own content." which is the recommended guideline. As far as 3279:

Party as any position. More importantly, terms like 'centrist' and 'liberal' in popular media are dramatically inconsistent - those are relative to party, not the US political spectrum. Further, using three citations which each have a differing stance on the party to support a claim none of them make (that the party is center to center-left) is a violation of

2555: 1501: 3090:

American populous into enlisting to join either party since they both sounded similarly beneficial. The federalist democrats stood for stronger government to control the people. The democratic republic also known as the republicans stood for embracing the needs of the people and helping them to grow and become responsible.

2994:), don't have the intuitive -Democratic-Party formulation and readers will come to this article to find their state's article. While this article has become quite large, creating a content fork for a columned list of 50 or so state parties is not going to help. We'd be better off spinning out articles for, say, 1038:. But I agree with removing it for another reason - it's very much out of date and really rather off topic. The poll is from 2005 and was a poll of liberals in general, not liberal Democrats. There are liberals who are not Democrats and having the poll in this article is not very useful. I'll remove it. -- 3032:

Not an unreasonable argument. I agree about splitting out the voter base and policy positions. I suggest that we add a section that discusses the importance of the state parties (and their role in the party) and put the link to the list at the top of the new section. The Directory is not needed given

2787:

hard work. Removing them may be more difficult. Second, maybe Drmies wants to remove that information because they feel it doesn't pertain, something they've tried to explain, and maybe Rjensen can assume a little frigging good faith. No, if this article covered them, it wouldn't be this article. The

2752:

Rjensen, the links to the Knowledge (XXG) articles are there. The URLs turn this into a kind of phone book. Yes, this is an article for the Democratic party, and so a link to the Democratic party website is appropriate: it is NOT an article about all those local parties, and so all those links to the

2703:

applies as well. First of all, there is really no rationale for linking to the party's website from this place; one assumes, since all the blue links are working, that the local party's article has that link in the EL section, and that's fair. So listing them here, in this general article, isn't just

1678:

In general recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital does not exist unless explicitly stated. There are no major parties in any significant nation besides the United States (no offense intended to Palau) that recognize Jerusalem as capital of Israel and there are no significant nations besides the

992:

has one of my biggest pet peeves in politics. It lists as one of the topics "immigration" and gives liberal support at 58-36%. But that's an absurdity. Does it mean that 58% of liberals think we should have immigration and 36% want to completely close our borders to outsiders? The problem is with

265:

for details. How the left the party and became Republicans 1980-2000 is an important part of the Conservative story. Consider: "For many years, factions within the Texas Democratic Party resembled a two-party system, and the election to select the ... Until the 1990s, conservative Democrats were much

184:

I believe that on the French side they are contemplating putting a "Head of State" section in on the party info boxes like they do for the upper and lower houses. We have a section for governorship so would anyone object to this? I don't think either party would dispute that holding the presidency is

2804:

Drmies (you) wants other people to assume his good faith but has totally changed his (your) position. He (you) started by insisting on the rules but now he claims he really removed links because they don't "pertain." But he misread the rules and now he (you) misunderstands how the Democratic party

1637:

Beijing isn't disputed as the capital of China, i.e. no other groups of people lay claim to it. I don't know how important the issue, the capital of Israel, is to the party and US politics. It was some good comedy watching the "vote" that Viragosa held for changing it back. The "yays" and "nays"

1001:

where we would allow day laborers to come under employment visas, as opposed to the current system, where our guest workforce is for specialists, artists, skilled professionals, etc. Rather than just unilaterally doing something to the image, I wanted to run it by here first. Option 1 is to change

650:

The consensus was reached among 3 editors directly involved in the conflict (TFD, Toa Nidhiki, and me) and from another editor (Greg Bard) that the political spectrum should be deleted entirely. Arzel, you were the only dissenter who was directly involved in the conflict. 80% (or 4 out of 5 editors)

3433:

advocates "decentralization of government power to the lowest level possible," the contemporary Democratic Party "seeks to create a mixed economy by providing government intervention and regulation in the economy...such as universal healthcare, social programs, equal opportunity, labor protections,

674:

We can all agree that the Democrats are mostly to the left of the Republican Party but there is no agreement about where the center lies or whether it is a single point or a range. Info-boxes are for non-controversial information, e.g., when a party was founded, who its leader is, not for disputed

501:

meaningless and not a substitute for discussion. We go by consensus and the !vote is generally less important than the arguments made. In a heated debate with a large number or people a straw poll may be useful to see where people stand... But this is a small dispute with only a few people. !Voting

3614:

Furthermore, all of the sources to back up the claim are questionable or clearly not reliable sources. A couple of personal blogs are not sufficient to label a group in this manner, especially when it can be clearly shown that the label is ridiculous. And if anything the Democratic Party is even

3278:

None of Blonedegunative's citations are sufficient to establish political position. The NYT article says nothing about the party's stance, the Huffington Post article is an opinion piece that says nothing about the party's stance, and the Princeton article does not explicitly define the Democratic

1296:

Now, in the American sense social liberalism essentially supports abortion, gay marriage, gun control, and hate crimes laws as well as affirmative action and welfare. This isn't Britain, so semantic differences are to be expected - we don't call a toilet a 'loo', we don't call oil 'petrol', and we

1060:

Would it be appropriate for this page to have a section on Democratic opinions on drug decriminalization/legalization? I understand that even marijuana legalization is a controversial issue among Democrats (though I think most support it), but many more seem to support decriminalization or medical

621:

Arzel, in a worldwide perspective(which is what Greg Bard was referring to), the Democrats would be considered right-wing (to put it more nicely, Center-right). Conservatives in Britain and Canada support universal healthcare, abortion, same-sex marriage, believe in and want to end global warming,

379:

Actually, I'd say the process started earlier, with the New Deal's success in stamping the Democrats as to the left of the Republicans and the contemporaneous near-elimination of any left-wing alternatives to the Big Two at the ballot box; but the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as Lyndon

2830:

OK, here's another go. The Democratic Party is, apparently, a coalition of state parties. Those state parties have articles. Those state parties' websites are linked in their respective articles. This article is on the coalition and does not need to link to the individual state parties' websites.

2419:

be more appropriate? The common name of the Democratic Party is the "Democratic Party." But since there are other political parties throughout the world which are also named the "Democratic Party," it requires more than just the common name for disambiguation. Knowledge (XXG) has used "Democratic

2304:

In the voter base or ideology section of this article "Social Democrats" should be included, as they form an important part of the party's voter base and ideology. In other words there is a strong belief in the Democratic Party of the Welfare State, and many of the party's members are in favor of

765:

The media doesn't usually refer to any specific party in terms of a political spectrum. Collectively, they refer to the "right", which is most closely associated with the Republicans-- but can also be used for Blue Dog Democrats (who are Conservative). The media also refers to the "left" which is

2767:

What i can't understand is why Drmies wants to undo the hard, useful work of other editors. Is he locked into his personal reading of the rules? It is useful information. The Democratic Party is actually a coalition of state political parties--you see that at the national convention and national

2365:

If one reads the Charter of the Democratic Party, the full name of the party, which that document uses, is actually the "Democratic Party of the United States of America." I'm bringing this up because, well...wouldn't it make more sense to simply use the full name of the party for disambiguation

1859:

Is it possible to change the heading picture from the D in the circle into the modern democrat symbol? The main reason why this irks me and others I know is because this is the picture that shows up when entered as your political views on Facebook. I find it would be more recognizable to see the

1397:

The history section of this article needs to be better divided into eras. Currently, the only three sub-headings are "1860", "1900", and "Modern Era". This places unjustified significance on both the 1860 and 1900 elections, and utterly neglects the other portions of the party's history. It also

1366:

The word "social" in "social liberalism" refers to economic policies to help people not cultural issues. Compare with social democracy, which has nothing to do with same sex marriage. The American Right generally accepts liberal attitudes about a decade later. Notice that today they no longer

789:

I "vote" to abstain. The fundamental problem is not with what is the field populated with (left, center-left, center-center, center-right, blah blah blah). The fundamental problem is with the existence of the field itself: this filed is open to so much subjectivity(read: POV), by Knowledge (XXG)

3441:

Though the Democratic Party may have flirted with this "Third Way" for a brief time in the 1990s, I think the contradictions with the Democratic Party as it is now, and as it was through most of the 20th century, suggest that the "Third Way" is not the defining economic policy of the Democratic

3266:

right-leaning descriptions of the party were hyperbole and shouldn't be taken into consideration when describing the parties ideological range. Talk to me if you are looking for more definitive citations of centrists, I was having a hard time finding a recent ideological paper for that faction.

3265:

Aside from the overtly centrist and Third Way factions, conservative democrats identify as centrists. While center left is identified in media with any liberal or progressive policies or politicians. The consensus before was that it was some sort of big tent party. Most left-wing, far left, and

2813:

that is poor arithmetic--it's over 50 links. Are they useful? yes. Do they belong according to the rules? yes. Are the state parties unimportant "local" bodies as he (you) says? No--they have always been central--and everyone can see that: the president is elected by the Electoral College = the

1987:

On May 22 2013 many progressive parties worldwide founded the Progressive Alliance in Berlin, Democratic Party included. Probaly the international affiliation should be updated in the page and, as long as the Alliance of Democrats website has been offline for a few time, we should check if this

223:

Well we could just put "President" and yes I know it mentions it in the article but it also mentions that they control the Senate. I mean the whole point of the infobox to me seems to show someone quickly the numbers. I especially appreciate this when I can't speak the language like articles in

3454:

article. However, I have been having difficulty finding reputable sources that directly acknowledge and label any change in the Democrats' ideology between the Bill Clinton era and today. Would others be able to help find a good source with an appropriate label for the economic ideology of the

3089:

It should read democrats came originally from the federalists party. It was disbanded when they took the name democrat to pull the extension fore name; democratic(people) from the term people republican, also known as democratic republican. This effect of diverting the name democrat fooled the

2069:

The Democratic Party is a founding member of the Progressive Alliance according to the official Progressive Alliance website. Also, the Alliance of Democrats should be removed from the info box on the main Democratic Party page as only some members of Democratic organizations are part of that

333:

Let's not be recentist, either! In the 19th century and well into the 20th century, the Democrats were sometimes the more conservative party, depending on local factors. In fact, in the earlier part of the 20th century, the Democrats were the most conservative political party in Wisconsin's

741: 699: 2630:

Political parties are normally described as left or right wing. Why is the Democratic Party instead described variously as conservative and liberal? It is a broad party, and certainly some parts are more left wing than others, but isn't "left wing" or "centre left" a more accurate

2085:

Actually, the only place I can find the name of the Democratic Party on that website is on a page with the name progressive-alliance.info/expected-guests/ and titled "Expected Participants". That is not evidence that the Democratic Party has ever been a member of that organization.

3406:"reject income redistribution as the means to achieve" egalitarianism, contemporary "Democrats support a more progressive tax structure to provide more services and reduce economic inequality by making sure that the wealthiest Americans pay the highest amount in taxes." 3311:

Second sentence of second paragraph: "The parties philosophy of contemporary American liberalism has its origins in left-of-center liberalism, which seeks to create a mixed economy by providing government intervention and regulation in the economy." It should read "the

1679:

United States that recognize Jerusalem as capital of Israel. Both the fact that enough democrats have changed their minds about recognition of Israel's choice of capital to get the party platform changed, and enough haven't changed their minds about it is significant.

1339:

It is interesting, but that poll only gives the option to completely overturn or leave as-is. Since most people support abortion for the first trimester, women's health, rape, and incest, this makes sense. But the numbers also show only 13% think abortion is moral.

1607:(ec)It was on the front page for one day (just like many other trivia) and then this silly trivial one day change disappeared at the platform and in the news so it doesn't seem to have had a major impact notable in a historical way. Reminder: We're not the news. 1321:

abortion is interesting in this regard – its importance as a political issue has been steadily declining. Majorities of all groups, except a slim 54% of evangelical Christians, reject the idea that Row v Wade should be overturned. See the Pew poll results at

1189:

You'd be hard put to get a majority for any given one of those proposals in a lot of Democratic caucuses, and in a lot of Democratic legislative caucuses in particular. At best, you'd get one-three out of the four; and which one(s) would vary all over the map.

2737:

the rule states: "Knowledge (XXG) articles about any organization, person, website, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any" This is an article on the Dem party and it links to its many websites exactly as recommended by the rules.

3539:

in their platform? I would add that the second source you mention, doesn't just "talk about Obamacare." If you read further down, it actually discusses how the "social democratic future" of the country is dependent on Democratic Party electoral victories.

3348:

It could say "New Deal philosophy originally was to provide relief to different essential industries and relief to individuals to an extent, but later it was expanded to include more relief programs for individuals, including financial aid and workers

2229:

There is a good argument to be made that the correct name should be "Democrat" and not "Democratic" party. An example: Say I am a Fundamentalist and I form a political party. Should it be called the Fundamentalist Party, or the Fundamentalistic Party?

1128:. Comparison to other western nations is really not useful, since most political party articles (with the exception of communist/far-left parties and fascist/far-left parties) go by their own countries' systems, not some imaginary international scale. 3352:

The term "Civil Rights" within the context used assumes it did something to enhance the rights of African-Americans and other minorities, which it didn't. The New deal philosophy dealt solely with economic policy, not with the rights of minorities

2589: 2233:

See my comments on the "Democrat Party (epithet)" article. Neither the fact that "Democrat" is used as a negative epithet or that "Democratic" is by far the majority usage should have any bearing on the grammatical correctness of the term.

2580:

The article currently states "In 2013, Democrats in the Senate passed S.744, which would reform immigration policy to allow citizenship for illegal immigrants in the US and improve the lives of all immigrants living in the United States"

2694:

The article has a list of (blue-linked) Democratic "state and territory parties", which is fine, but what's not so fine is that all those entries came with a "Site" URL to the party's official website. This, I submit, is in violation of

1835:

he American Democratic Party dates to the 1830s, with the Republican Party about 20 years younger. Both are probably the oldest political parties in existence, depending on when one dates the formation of Great Britain's political

1536:. The edit request was properly closed as "not done" nearly a year ago. Innumerable reliable sources confirm the existence of the Democratic Party, and reopening the request with unsourced claims to the contrary is unconstructive. 815:. This field must definitely be removed from this article. This field only provokes pointless "battles" on this talk page ("It's leftist!" - "No, it's centrist!" - "No, it's center-left!" - "No, it's !"). For example, there were 1166:

Since when are on-demand, taxpayer-funded abortion, gay marriage, gun control, and hate crimes laws not 'social liberal policy'? Regardless, reliable sources view the Democratic Party as a modern, American liberal organization.

2103:

I suspect this recurring issue could be easily resolved if someone just e-mailed the Democratic Party and asked them if they are members of this group. I don't think this will really stop until a definitive 'no' is given.

732:

That is not accurate. That is based on the claim that the left-right spectrum doesn't apply to American politics. American politics regularly speaks of left-wing and right-wing. The Republican Party for instance is in the

2989:

Not listing the state parties here is a major omission and a disservice to our readers. The state and territorial parties are a key part of how the Democratic Party is structured in the United States. Many states (like

1705:

While the democratic party did historically favor some ethnic minorities like the Irish the party was split over African American rights, as recently as FDR a Democratic president was against anti-lynching legislation.

839:, we have to remove this field or to expand it with all qualifications. The later option is unfeasible (the whole point of the infobox is having short descriptions), thus only one remains: we should remove the field. -- 2782:

Why is Rjensen talking about me as if I'm in the other room? And why do they ask loaded questions, like "why Drmies wants to undo the hard, useful work of other editors"? First of all, sticking in a couple of links is

3595:

Agree, The best course of action would be to find some recent reliable sources to back up the claim. Not sure how it even was put into the article in the first place. Third way was an option to Dem/Rep. Calling a

3534:

page? Certainly we cannot allow a situation where one Knowledge (XXG) page says "Universally, X = 2" and another says "2 + X = 5." Why do you believe my sources are incorrect to suggest that the Democratic Party has

698:. If there is the issue of the number of conservative Democrats being small in comparison to centrist to centre-left Democrats, then an alternative is "Centre to centre-left". There are centrist Democrats, see here 701:. I would like to see sources of the different perspectives on this matter before making a final decision. And a Request for Comment should be made to get a large view from the Knowledge (XXG) community on this.-- 1735:

Why is the Democratic Party part of Wikiproject Conservatism? Surely WikiProject Socialism, where liberal parties like Germany's Social Democrats or the UK's Labour are included would seem like a better option?

3254:

Wanting to add position as center to left of center, with references. There are multiple sources noting some clear centrist and moderate factions in the party, as well as left-leaning and center left factions.

1002:

the caption from "Immigration" to "Guest Worker Program". Option 2 is to simply eliminate that line item all together since the question is out of date and doesn't really tell us anything meaningful today. --

2646:

Only if you ignore the meanings of those terms. The Democratic Party has a microscopic leftish wing, but by the standards of political science, not of any significance; and the party itself is clearly not

280:

I think I might have tagged it, but only for historical reasons. There really isn't much about the national party that is conservative, but southern, conservative Democrats had a lot of power up until the

2206:

Although I may disagree with your politics, Mr. Beckle, I do applaud what you have done with your life and the efforts put forth to improve others with same problems in their lives. Happy Birthday, Bob!

224:

French and I know some people can't speak English obviously. I know that's not a great reason but my general point is that it provides info in a simplistic way that doesn't require reading the article.(

3442:

Party. I would advocate removing the "Third Way" descriptor from the summary box, and replacing it with another descriptor that resolves these contradictions. I believe the content at the articles for

548:

My preferred version was to characterize as "Center to Center left". Deleting the section entirely was a compromise suggested and agreed upon by a 3 of the 4 editors directly involved in the conflict.

2672:

101.98 If you believe that the party is liberal or center-left the best thing to do is bring RS refs that indicates that specifically. Otherwise, no, "centre-left" is not a more accurate description.

856:- Left-Right politics are globally understood and carry significance around the world. The Democratic Party is centre to centre-left if the Republican Party is categorized merely as "centre-right".-- 2860: 2459:

identical. Since the full name of the Democratic Party is the Democratic Party of the United States of America, it is entirely unique. It's only identical if you ignore the full name of the party.

3474:, and one from a policy analysis in 2014 describing how the Democratic Party is the vessel for a new wave of Social Democracy in the United States. I have introduced those sources with my edit. 2788:

articles that actually cover them, those cover them. Seems pretty elementary to Drmies, I'm told. Now, I hope that some other editors will weigh in, and they are free to use the second person.

2768:

committee, so the article certainly does cover them. Drmies repeatedly calls the state parties "local parties" (as in Chicago) but that is false-- these are the states that make up the Party.

1645: 1456:

Title of this page is "Democratic" Party....there is NO Democratic Party in the United States. It is the DEMOCRAT Party. It should say Democrat Party. Feel free to see the Democrat page at

534:

So if I understand you correctly, since no one has commented on your preferred version you take it to be that there is concensus for your personal opinion? Concensus does not work that way.

3470:

UPDATE: I've now found two sources- one from a Comparative Politics journal in 1978 describing at least a portion of the Democratic Party as "consistently aspiring" to make America more of a

2318: 2171:

at the conference; I've removed it once more. And Toa: we don't operate like that - extraordinary claims, in particular, require solid published references from reliable sources, not ]. The

1560:

about the removal from the party platform of recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and the reinstating of the recognition the following day. It was covered on the front page of

997:, was "Allowing immigrants to enter the U.S. legally and work here for a limited amount of time". Of course, that's a horribly worded question - but what I'm sure it was referring to was a 249:

has been tagged for WPConservatism!!! I nearly shorted out my laptop when I spit out my coffee! Ok. So who's the joker that tagged this? C'mon. You know I'll eventually find out... –

3233:

Noticed a typo "Democrats have supported increadomestic renewable energy development"" to be changed to "Democrats have supported increased domestic renewable energy development"

1947:

please be more specific about what needs to be changed. I don't see anything like that in this article. You might mean a different one. What city is "Springer" the mayor of?

3554:

There are no 'contradictions', your post is entirely made up of inaccuracies and extreme POV interpretations. I won't comment further on such inaccurate portrayals of policies.

2597:"improve the lives of all immigrants" - the bill aims to do many things. Whether it will improve the lives of "all immigrants" is a value judgement and thus not neutral POV. 3398:. However, after reading the article for the "Third Way" ideology, it seems to me that this is a wildly inaccurate label for the modern Democratic Party, for several reasons: 1267:

usually refers to the ideology formulated by British liberals in the late 19th century and implimented after the Second World War, which did not include any of these things.

2975:

Well, perhaps someone could make the positive case for this directory listing within this already over-long article. I would suggest that its inclusion here is not optimal.

2416: 1099:

I'd say the politicas of the Democrat are somewhat moderate rather than as it is currently described "modern liberalism" especially when compard with other western nations.

1568:. My edit was reverted twice because editors considered it trivia. I thought I would bring the issue to the talk page to reach a consensus one way or the other. Thanks, 2753:

websites for all those local parties are simply not appropriate. And please, "a lot of work"--we're talking about a couple of URLs, not about writing beautiful content.

2268:. The political party in question has exactly one name, no matter what anyone may choose to call it, and you cannot provide a single reliable source to prove otherwise. 1806:

This statement has a source link that refers to an Encyclopedia Britannica article. Something seems off about an encyclopedia citing another encyclopedia for accuracy.

1709:

It should be clear reading that for a period the democrats at some point were split with both the civil rights leadership and segregationists being in the same party.

3415:"emphasizes commitment to balanced budgets," contemporary Democrats systematically oppose budget-balancing measures related to just about anything except the military. 2991: 820: 816: 97: 89: 84: 72: 1649: 832: 828: 824: 607:

This is an international encyclopedia and one would expect that all the parties labelled center-left would have similar ideologies, bases of support and policies.

67: 59: 3345:

It should be noted that there were two "New Deals", The ideology started with some aspects of the economy but grew as the necessity of more programs was apparent

1152:

I agree. While the Democratic Party embraced some social liberal policies from the 1960s to the 1960s, there was no reformulation of basic liberal principles.

2594:"In 2013, Democrats in the Senate passed" -- Republicans also voted for the bill. Perhaps something along the lines of "Democrats overwhelmingly supported..." 3256: 1462:@ Ohnoitsjamie... Just because some in this party don't understand the difference between Democrat and democratic, doesn't make it accurate! It's Democrat! 1017:

This whole file should be deleted, or at least not used in an article, since it has a deadlink as a "source" and is so poorly worded as to be meaningless. --

2814:

states. Likewise the Senators and Congressmen. Likewise the Dem National Committee. Likewise the presidential primaries and the 2016 national convention.

2538:

The line immediately under the heading "Minimum wage": Please change "all American's have" to "all Americans have..." Plurals do not require apostrophes.

2438:. This is one of the most widely used party names in this encyclopedia. and a change would affect tens of thousands of articles for no net improvement. -- 993:

conflating "legal immigration" with other kinds of not-so-legal immigration (insert your preferred term here). The actual question polled, according to

3053:

Every article at wikipedia that includes the Democratic Party template includes this a full and complete list (with links) to every single state party.

475:

If no one is going to vote, I'm going ahead with what seemed to be the consensus in the discussion and delete the political spectrum from the infobox.

201:

Well it already lists Barack Obama as 'President of the United States', so does that not qualify since he is the Head of State and Head of Government?

873:- I am in favor of changing to "Center", "Centre", "Center-right", or "Centre-right", as that would be closer aligned to a worldview of the subject. - 3490:

You cannot define a political party in that manner and claim "no longer true" based on your interpretation of a source based on a moment in history.

3424:

places "an emphasis on personal responsibility," many contemporary Democrats believe that equal opportunity is achieved through affirmative action.

455:

They're done all the time in AFD's and discussions over whether to merge articles. It's the only way to see if we can get consensus over an issue.

3338:

The article currently states "New Deal liberalism meant the promotion of social welfare, labor unions, civil rights, and regulation of business."

791: 2914:

WSe do NOT have a consensus here to remove the list. I count 2-2: myself and Blondeguynative for KEEPING and Capitalismojo Drmies FOR DROPPING.

3050:

Every state party that has a non-standard name (including MN DFL) has a redirect that takes you to the right article when you search wikipedia.

1612: 423:

We should change or delete the description because multiple sources conflict over where the Democrats are in the American political spectrum.

2928:

WP:BRD The onus is on editors who want to add material to make positive reason for inclusion. Links to the directory list are in the article

1924:

In the first paragraph, Springer is referred to as the democraPic mayor instead op democraTic mayor. Just a silly typo, but it springs out.

132:

No. You clearly don't know the meaning of "socialism" and "fascism", which have historically been at odds. Fascists claim to oppose the left

47: 17: 2995: 1076:

This is one of those issues where the overlaps between the Dems and the Reps are so enormous as to make an effort like that a futile one. --

933:

The section concerning LGBT discrimination is now out of date. Since May 9 2012 Barack Obama's stance is now in favour of same-sex marriage.

2241: 1803:"The party has the lengthiest record of continuous operation in the United States and is among the oldest political parties in the world." 1716: 1686: 117: 2863:. I have put a link at See Also. I'd suggest getting rid of the list section here. It is important information but it clutters this page. 399:

Ok, ok. Just give me a heads up for this kind of stuff. You wouldn't want me to short out my computer---you guys would miss me too much.–

2896:

The wiki-link to the list of state parties appears twice in the article. It is in the Democratic Party template at the bottom and in the

3215: 3097: 2632: 2539: 2211: 1767:

That is incorrect. The reason is because of the party's historic association with conservative politics, especially in the South (read:

1405: 1638:

were at best 50/50. But a woman directed him to call it for the change, because they need the Jewish vote more than the Muslim vote.

1120:) confirm the Democratic Party as being a modern liberal and center-left party. Further, the party's largest wing by membership is the 2999: 1925: 836: 2322: 1737: 1608: 1293:. On other issues such as gay marriage support is gaining, but to say the same of gun control and hate crimes laws are a bit silly. 622:

and support relatively progressive tax brackets. The Democrats sometimes can't even get half their party to agree on these issues.

1583:

It is a big deal, since the party changed it and then changed it back over the objection of a large portion of the DNC delegates.

3531: 3369: 2954:. There is no reason the list can't be maintained here, where it makes more sense. The list is not even remotely a violation of 1121: 343: 246: 1880: 1263:

Conversely, conservatives in other countries support those policies and the American Right will as well in ten years time. But

3517: 3189:

added some more information to the "health care reform" section. let me know if you have any concerns or questions. thank you.

2613: 2382: 1876: 1478: 2047:

A lone Democratic governor, Shumlin of Vermont, was there; that does not mean that the Democratic Party joined this effort. --

3010: 2966: 2004: 502:

is not really needed here. I do support removing it from the infobox but we need to reach that through consensus, not vote.

2165:

And indeed, the bogus affiliation was inserted, again with no evidence except the appearance of a lone state governor as a

1035: 994: 1290: 3262: 3386:

In the summary box on the right of this article, I've noticed that the "Ideology" of the Democratic Party is labeled as

976: 949: 734: 1623:

I don't see how this is important. For instance, I don't see the platform recognising Beijing as the capital of China.

1034:

Well, I don't think the dead link is itself a reason to remove it since we have a perfectly good copy of the source at

2436:

If two parties from different countries have identical names, then the name of the country could be put in parentheses

1659:

There are millions (if not billions) of things that are NOT written on the party's platform because they are implied.

844: 339: 3259: 2339:"social democrats" is a term used in Europe but very rarely in the USA. So there is no need for it in this article. 1116:

The party's moderate faction is covered in "internal factions". Multiple reliable sources (at least three including

335: 245:

I poured myself a cup of coffee and fired up my really really cool WP:RIGHT Watchlist, and what do my eyes behold?

162:

Just ignore it, it looks like trolling, or a statement by a person who is very ignorant of the nature of fascism.--

38: 3125: 2517: 1903: 1435: 3271: 2306: 1664: 1628: 1372: 1272: 1254: 1157: 989: 680: 612: 322: 229: 190: 2955: 2730: 2696: 2245: 1720: 1690: 121: 3624: 3609: 3586: 3563: 3549: 3521: 3499: 3485: 3464: 3373: 3328: 3300: 3244: 3223: 3198: 3178: 3155: 3105: 3076: 3042: 3012: 2984: 2968: 2941: 2923: 2909: 2887: 2872: 2840: 2823: 2797: 2777: 2762: 2747: 2723: 2681: 2667: 2640: 2617: 2569: 2547: 2489: 2471: 2450: 2429: 2410: 2386: 2348: 2326: 2298: 2277: 2249: 2219: 2187: 2160: 2138: 2121: 2098: 2079: 2059: 2028: 2008: 1974: 1956: 1933: 1846: 1815: 1788: 1762: 1745: 1724: 1694: 1668: 1653: 1632: 1616: 1600: 1577: 1545: 1523: 1492: 1413: 1376: 1357: 1334: 1314: 1276: 1258: 1244: 1224: 1202: 1184: 1161: 1145: 1110: 1088: 1070: 1047: 1029: 1011: 953: 922: 902: 882: 865: 848: 805: 775: 752: 727: 710: 684: 660: 631: 616: 602: 593:

Those that believe the Democrats are right-wing can be ignored at hand for having no concept of US politics.

581: 557: 543: 519: 484: 464: 447: 432: 403: 392: 372: 358: 326: 306: 275: 253: 233: 218: 194: 171: 157: 125: 3219: 3101: 2950:

is not going to help your argument. Creating a content fork of the list of state parties is unnecessary and

2543: 2215: 1409: 3292: 3240: 3072: 3038: 2980: 2937: 2932:. Putting the full directory is inappropriate. No other party article handles it this way, for good reason. 2905: 2868: 2677: 2636: 2485: 2152: 2113: 1929: 1780: 1660: 1624: 1592: 1349: 1306: 1239: 1216: 1176: 1137: 1125: 1105: 840: 511: 298: 210: 149: 3357: 3093: 2601: 2477: 2395: 2370: 2314: 2237: 2037: 1992: 1864: 1741: 1712: 1682: 1641: 1466: 1401: 964: 937: 113: 3365: 1520: 262: 185:

very important to both of them. If there are no objections, does anyone know how to go about doing this? (

1488: 1286: 416:

We should vote to see whether there is consensus over deleting or changing "Center-Left" in the Infobox

3212: 3194: 2462:

And as far as the issue of cross references goes, that problem could be solved with a simple redirect.--

1811: 898: 695: 286: 3573:, you're going to have to be more specific if you want to be constructive. The cycle is "Bold, Revert, 3236: 3151: 835:

etc. (yes, all that has been taken from just two archive pages). It is clear that if we want to follow

3447: 3361: 3267: 3208: 3033:

that there are already three ways to find the state parties on this page not counting the directory.

2662: 2445: 2405: 2293: 2283: 2273: 2182: 2133: 2093: 2075: 2071: 2054: 2023: 1970: 1541: 1368: 1268: 1250: 1197: 1153: 1083: 1024: 998: 676: 608: 387: 353: 318: 225: 186: 3067:

I suggest that an additional full list beyond the template's full list is overkill and duplication.

2463: 2421: 2374: 1868: 1484: 1470: 1207:

They didn't have a hard time getting those into the party platform, which is what I got those from.

3582: 3545: 3513: 3481: 3460: 2609: 2467: 2425: 2378: 1996: 1952: 1872: 1474: 894: 771: 656: 627: 553: 480: 460: 428: 368: 3320: 2172: 1061:

permits, and Democrats tend to be a lot more liberal on these issues than those of other parties.

3285: 3068: 3034: 3008: 2976: 2964: 2933: 2901: 2864: 2673: 2481: 2145: 2106: 2000: 1773: 1585: 1342: 1299: 1234: 1209: 1169: 1130: 1100: 968: 941: 577: 504: 291: 203: 142: 3280: 2951: 737:, and the IDU describes itself as an organization of parties from the "centre to centre-right" 3435: 3425: 3416: 3407: 3387: 3324: 2919: 2819: 2773: 2743: 2564: 2344: 1842: 1768: 1758: 1514: 1330: 1264: 801: 723: 282: 271: 3597: 1826: 3536: 3471: 3451: 3443: 3190: 2883: 2836: 2793: 2758: 2719: 1807: 1573: 1066: 972: 945: 878: 2947: 2257: 3620: 3605: 2656: 2439: 2399: 2287: 2269: 2176: 2127: 2087: 2048: 2017: 1966: 1537: 1323: 1191: 1077: 1018: 861: 598: 539: 443: 381: 347: 261:

there were many conservative Democrats, especially in the South, in the 20th century. See

3505: 2734: 2700: 2265: 1508:

That site uses the phrase "Democratic Party" in numerous instances (several of which are

995:

http://web.archive.org/web/20060214150029/http://people-press.org/reports/tables/242.pdf

3578: 3559: 3541: 3509: 3495: 3477: 3456: 3174: 2605: 1948: 917: 767: 748: 706: 652: 623: 549: 476: 456: 424: 364: 317:

I agree with Rjensen and Toa. There still are conservative Democrats, the blue dogs.

167: 137: 2261: 1281:

A bit of a bold statement there - to pick one, support for abortion has been steadily

910: 3526:

How would you resolve the contradictions I brought up between the definitions on the

3395: 3003: 2959: 1828:

When Political Parties Die: A Cross-National Analysis of Disalignment and Realignment

573: 1509: 3147: 2915: 2815: 2769: 2739: 2707: 2340: 1838: 1754: 1326: 1117: 889:

Susequently (sp.) is misspelled in the 1860 subsection of History on the main page.

797: 719: 400: 267: 250: 1287:

Most Americans identify as pro-life and pro-choice identifiers are at a record low

3577:," not "Bold, Revert, contradict everything and refuse to discuss your reasons." 1753:

the Conservative Project studies opponents of conservatism as well as advocates.

2879: 2832: 2789: 2754: 2715: 2648: 2590:

Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013

2143:

Of course, but that's not stopping anyone here from insisting they are members.

1569: 1062: 1043: 1007: 874: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3616: 3601: 857: 718:

terms like "centre left" apply to European parliaments not to the US parties.

594: 535: 439: 3570: 3555: 3527: 3491: 3430: 3421: 3412: 3403: 3391: 3316:," not "parties," which is the plural form of the word, not the possessive. 3170: 2652: 744: 702: 163: 3229:

Typo "Democrats have supported increadomestic renewable energy development"

2366:

purposes as opposed to placing "United States" in parentheses next to it?

1457: 2588:

Perhaps the bill should be referred to by its full name and linked to.

1291:

the vast majority of Americans oppose abortion after the first trimester

833:

Talk:Democratic Party (United States)/Archive 9#Right Wing .2F Left Wing

817:

Talk:Democratic Party (United States)/Archive 10#RfC: Political Position

380:

Johnson famously said at the time, made it official (in the long run).--

2042: 2038:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Progressive_Alliance_(political_international)

1367:

support slavery, exclusion of Jews, oppose the Bill of Rights, etc.

1039: 1003: 829:

Talk:Democratic Party (United States)/Archive 9#Center-left revisited

412:

Vote on whether to Delete or Change "Center-Left" infobox description

2900:

section. The full blown list is not necessary, as discussed above.

740:. And contrary to claims otherwise, there are centrist Republicans 738: 825:

Talk:Democratic Party (United States)/Archive 9#Center-Left? How?

3113: 2505: 1891: 1423: 821:

Talk:Democratic Party (United States)/Archive_10#"Center-left"

25: 2861:

List of state parties of the Democratic Party (United States)

1860:

donkey logo so it would be even with the Republican Party.

893:

Since the page is protected, noting it here for resolution.

2282:

Also see my advice on that talk page, to study the article

3434:

environmental protection, and regulation on big business."

694:. preferably to: "Centre-right to centre-left". There are 3169:

please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. --

2958:

and should be kept as long as the editors here want it.

2828:

Wow, Rjensen, you are not the person I thought you were.

3475: 2711: 2126:

The burden is always on the person making the claim. --

1962: 1557: 3450:

provide a better match for the policies listed in the

3307:

Second Sentence of Second Paragraph: Grammatical Error

2996:

Policy positions of the United States Democratic Party

1324:

http://www.pewforum.org/Abortion/roe-v-wade-at-40.aspx

2260:

to determine "the correct name" of anything; we use

2584:I have several objections to the current phrasing: 285:and they pretty much all had left by or during the 1799:Knowledge (XXG) source is Encyclopedia Britannica? 3000:Voter base of the United States Democratic Party 1124:, a liberal/progressive group that advocates a 2704:needless but also turns this into a directory. 1297:don't call cookies 'biscuits' for instance. :) 8: 2502:Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2014 2175:is always on the person making the claim. -- 929:Edit request: section on LGBT discrimination 2805:works. It's a coalition of state parties. 110:Need to add socialist fascism to the list 3504:Agreed. This analysis is little more than 1126:very standard liberal/progressive platform 3250:Political position: center to center-left 2476:This is a solution in need of a problem. 3060:that takes you to list of state parties. 2455:But what I'm saying is that the name is 1458:http://www.democrats.org/about/our_party 438:Votes like this are meaningless on WP. 2016:You got a source for that assertion? -- 792:Popular Democratic Party of Puerto Rico 2480:offers clear guidance on this matter. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1646:2001:DA8:D800:107:D07C:2B8C:97BD:E617 837:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 18:Talk:Democratic Party (United States) 7: 2319:2001:558:6011:54:402F:6D36:9F0A:3B79 2043:http://progressive-alliance.info/en/ 1564:and I included a reference from the 3600:and removing it from the article. 3382:"Third Way" label no longer applies 3341:I have objections to this phrasing 2729:Drmies simply misreads the rule at 2710:reverted my removal of those links 2807:"sticking in a couple of links is 2070:alliance, not the official party. 960:(He said his views had 'evolved'). 651:should be considered a consensus. 24: 2256:At Knowledge (XXG), we don't use 3532:Democratic Party (United States) 3161: 3117: 2553: 2509: 1939: 1895: 1528: 1499: 1427: 1420:Edit request on 4 September 2012 1122:Congressional Progressive Caucus 909: 247:Democratic Party (United States) 180:Head of State section in Infobox 29: 3085:Edit request on 30 October 2013 2264:names, as reflected in various 1965:, and it's already been fixed. 1854: 3274:) 2:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 3245:05:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 2188:12:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 1888:Edit request on 29 August 2013 1393:Better define areas of History 140:). The Democrats are neither. 1: 3486:14:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 3465:13:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 3224:22:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 2220:23:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 1988:alliance is still in place. 1855:Change Page's profile picture 1669:02:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 1654:08:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 1633:08:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 1617:00:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1601:00:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1578:00:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 1524:21:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1493:21:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1071:01:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 883:03:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 808:, and I approve this message. 3625:14:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3610:14:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3587:13:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3564:11:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3550:06:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3522:05:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3500:05:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 3374:03:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC) 3329:08:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC) 3301:03:05, 17 October 2014 (UTC) 3179:15:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 3156:15:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 2490:15:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 2472:19:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2451:06:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 2430:15:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 2411:03:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 2349:22:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 2327:22:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 1823:bad source: I fixed it from 1414:22:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 1377:03:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1358:00:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC) 1335:23:50, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1315:22:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1277:22:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1259:21:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1245:21:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1225:22:41, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1203:22:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1185:22:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1162:21:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1146:21:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1111:20:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 1089:21:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC) 735:International Democrat Union 3615:less in the center today. 3455:current Democratic Party? 3140:to reactivate your request. 3128:has been answered. Set the 2532:to reactivate your request. 2520:has been answered. Set the 2387:19:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC) 1975:06:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 1957:05:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 1934:10:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC) 1918:to reactivate your request. 1906:has been answered. Set the 1481:) 00:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 1450:to reactivate your request. 1438:has been answered. Set the 1048:14:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC) 1030:21:23, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 1012:19:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 954:17:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 923:20:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 903:19:51, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 3655: 3204:International associations 2682:04:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC) 2668:01:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC) 2641:05:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC) 2570:14:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 2548:14:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 2299:18:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 2278:17:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 2250:12:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 2225:"Democratic" vs "Democrat" 2161:13:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2139:02:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2122:02:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2099:01:57, 9 August 2013 (UTC) 2080:22:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 1233:You agree with me or Toa? 136:the right (hence the term 3199:19:47, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 2618:00:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC) 1983:International Affiliation 1881:02:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 1847:21:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 1816:21:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC) 1789:16:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 1763:13:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 1746:10:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 1731:Wikiproject conservatism? 1546:06:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 990:File:Liberal opinions.png 985:File:Liberal opinions.png 806:00:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 776:04:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 753:23:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 728:16:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 711:15:59, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 685:04:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 661:01:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 632:04:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 617:17:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 603:17:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 582:00:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 558:01:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC) 544:23:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 520:21:42, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 485:21:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 465:03:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC) 448:23:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 433:22:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 404:09:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 393:17:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 373:08:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 359:18:18, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 327:12:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 307:12:30, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 276:09:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 254:08:48, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 172:00:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC) 158:00:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 126:00:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 3106:06:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 3077:21:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 3043:21:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 3013:15:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 2985:00:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 2969:18:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC) 2942:03:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC) 2924:03:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC) 2910:03:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC) 2888:01:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC) 2873:01:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC) 2841:01:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC) 2824:01:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC) 2798:00:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC) 2778:22:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 2763:21:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 2748:21:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 2724:18:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 2690:Directory-style weblinks 2434:Even that article says, 2060:14:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC) 2029:12:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 2009:07:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 1825:Charles S. MacK (2010). 1725:03:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 1695:03:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 1552:Change in party platform 866:16:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 849:21:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 234:09:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 219:20:07, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 195:19:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 2859:There is now a list at 1701:"and ethnic minorities" 1562:The Wall Street Journal 3437:(Intro, 2nd paragraph) 1285:in the US since 1995. 696:conservative Democrats 263:Conservative coalition 287:Republican Revolution 42:of past discussions. 3448:Democratic Socialism 2284:etymological fallacy 999:guest worker program 344:stalwart Republicans 3056:This article has a 2878:Excellent. Thanks. 2394:Actually, no; read 1249:I agree with you. 334:four-party system ( 3185:health care reform 2948:other stuff exists 2311:15 December 2014 2262:verifiably correct 1963:at another article 1831:. ABC-CLIO. p. 27. 346:and Democrats). -- 3530:page, and on the 3506:original research 3388:Social liberalism 3377: 3360:comment added by 3144: 3143: 3096:comment added by 2621: 2604:comment added by 2536: 2535: 2390: 2373:comment added by 2317:comment added by 2258:original research 2240:comment added by 2012: 1995:comment added by 1961:It was vandalism 1922: 1921: 1884: 1867:comment added by 1833:, which states: " 1769:Southern Democrat 1715:comment added by 1685:comment added by 1661:Illegal Operation 1644:comment added by 1625:Illegal Operation 1483: 1469:comment added by 1454: 1453: 1404:comment added by 1265:social liberalism 981: 967:comment added by 957: 940:comment added by 841:Martynas Patasius 283:Reagan revolution 116:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3646: 3537:social democracy 3472:social democracy 3452:Democratic Party 3444:Social Democracy 3376: 3354: 3296: 3289: 3165: 3164: 3135: 3131: 3121: 3120: 3114: 3108: 3006: 2962: 2665: 2659: 2620: 2598: 2568: 2557: 2556: 2527: 2523: 2513: 2512: 2506: 2448: 2442: 2408: 2402: 2389: 2367: 2329: 2309: 2296: 2290: 2266:reliable sources 2252: 2185: 2179: 2156: 2149: 2136: 2130: 2117: 2110: 2096: 2090: 2057: 2051: 2026: 2020: 2011: 1989: 1943: 1942: 1913: 1909: 1899: 1898: 1892: 1883: 1861: 1832: 1784: 1777: 1727: 1697: 1656: 1596: 1589: 1532: 1531: 1518: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1482: 1463: 1445: 1441: 1431: 1430: 1424: 1416: 1353: 1346: 1310: 1303: 1242: 1237: 1220: 1213: 1200: 1194: 1180: 1173: 1141: 1134: 1108: 1103: 1086: 1080: 1027: 1021: 980: 961: 956: 934: 913: 515: 508: 421:Change or Delete 390: 384: 356: 350: 302: 295: 214: 207: 153: 146: 128: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3654: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3384: 3355: 3336: 3309: 3294: 3287: 3268:Blondeguynative 3252: 3231: 3206: 3187: 3162: 3133: 3129: 3118: 3091: 3087: 3004: 2960: 2956:WP:NOTDIRECTORY 2731:WP:NOTDIRECTORY 2697:WP:NOTDIRECTORY 2692: 2663: 2657: 2628: 2599: 2578: 2562: 2554: 2525: 2521: 2510: 2504: 2446: 2440: 2406: 2400: 2368: 2363: 2312: 2307: 2294: 2288: 2235: 2227: 2204: 2183: 2177: 2154: 2147: 2134: 2128: 2115: 2108: 2094: 2088: 2055: 2049: 2024: 2018: 1990: 1985: 1940: 1911: 1907: 1896: 1890: 1862: 1857: 1824: 1801: 1782: 1775: 1733: 1710: 1703: 1680: 1639: 1594: 1587: 1566:Washington Post 1554: 1529: 1516: 1500: 1498: 1464: 1443: 1439: 1428: 1422: 1399: 1395: 1351: 1344: 1308: 1301: 1240: 1235: 1218: 1211: 1198: 1192: 1178: 1171: 1139: 1132: 1106: 1101: 1097: 1084: 1078: 1058: 1025: 1019: 987: 962: 935: 931: 891: 513: 506: 414: 388: 382: 354: 348: 300: 293: 243: 226:Fshoutofdawater 212: 205: 187:Fshoutofdawater 182: 151: 144: 111: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3652: 3650: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3612: 3590: 3589: 3439: 3438: 3427: 3418: 3409: 3383: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3350: 3346: 3335: 3332: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3251: 3248: 3230: 3227: 3205: 3202: 3186: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3142: 3141: 3122: 3111: 3086: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3079: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3054: 3051: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 2891: 2890: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2627: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2595: 2592: 2577: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2534: 2533: 2514: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2460: 2432: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2302: 2301: 2280: 2242:88.120.130.106 2226: 2223: 2203: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2040: 2032: 2031: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1920: 1919: 1900: 1889: 1886: 1856: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1800: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1732: 1729: 1717:108.56.186.182 1702: 1699: 1687:108.56.186.182 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1620: 1619: 1604: 1603: 1553: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1526: 1452: 1451: 1432: 1421: 1418: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1294: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1149: 1148: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1057: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 986: 983: 930: 927: 926: 925: 890: 887: 886: 885: 868: 851: 810: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 758: 757: 756: 755: 713: 688: 687: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 619: 570:Delete/Comment 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 490: 489: 488: 487: 470: 469: 468: 467: 436: 435: 413: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 397: 396: 395: 361: 331: 330: 329: 312: 311: 310: 309: 278: 242: 239: 238: 237: 221: 181: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 138:Third Position 118:208.118.205.78 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3651: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3613: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3538: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3476: 3473: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3426: 3423: 3419: 3417: 3414: 3410: 3408: 3405: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3397: 3396:Progressivism 3393: 3389: 3381: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3351: 3347: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3339: 3333: 3331: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3317: 3315: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3291: 3290: 3282: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3273: 3269: 3264: 3261: 3258: 3249: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3228: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3216:177.182.56.45 3214: 3210: 3203: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3146:Edward Shils 3139: 3136:parameter to 3127: 3123: 3116: 3115: 3112: 3109: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3098:69.178.51.230 3095: 3084: 3080: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3069:Capitalismojo 3066: 3065: 3059: 3055: 3052: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3035:Capitalismojo 3014: 3011: 3009: 3007: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2977:Capitalismojo 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2965: 2963: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2934:Capitalismojo 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2902:Capitalismojo 2899: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2865:Capitalismojo 2862: 2843: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2702: 2698: 2689: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2674:Capitalismojo 2671: 2670: 2669: 2666: 2660: 2654: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2633:101.98.175.68 2625: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2596: 2593: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2575: 2571: 2566: 2560: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2540:194.75.231.26 2531: 2528:parameter to 2519: 2515: 2508: 2507: 2501: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2482:Capitalismojo 2479: 2478:WP:COMMONNAME 2475: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2458: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2449: 2443: 2437: 2433: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2418: 2415:But wouldn't 2414: 2413: 2412: 2409: 2403: 2397: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2361:Official Name 2360: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2310: 2300: 2297: 2291: 2285: 2281: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2231: 2224: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212:108.22.91.184 2208: 2201: 2189: 2186: 2180: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2151: 2150: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2131: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2112: 2111: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2097: 2091: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2061: 2058: 2052: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2030: 2027: 2021: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1982: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1917: 1914:parameter to 1905: 1901: 1894: 1893: 1887: 1885: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1830: 1829: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1804: 1798: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1779: 1778: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1730: 1728: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1707: 1700: 1698: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1657: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1591: 1590: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1527: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1519: 1511: 1506: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1460: 1459: 1449: 1446:parameter to 1437: 1433: 1426: 1425: 1419: 1417: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1406:99.162.58.181 1403: 1392: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1348: 1347: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1305: 1304: 1295: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1238: 1236:Pass a Method 1232: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1215: 1214: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1195: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1175: 1174: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1136: 1135: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1104: 1102:Pass a Method 1094: 1090: 1087: 1081: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1055: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1022: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1000: 996: 991: 984: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 958: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 928: 924: 921: 920: 916: 912: 908: 907: 906: 904: 900: 896: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 869: 867: 863: 859: 855: 852: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 811: 809: 807: 803: 799: 793: 788: 785: 784: 777: 773: 769: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 754: 750: 746: 742: 739: 736: 731: 730: 729: 725: 721: 717: 714: 712: 708: 704: 700: 697: 693: 690: 689: 686: 682: 678: 673: 670: 669: 662: 658: 654: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 633: 629: 625: 620: 618: 614: 610: 606: 605: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 571: 559: 555: 551: 547: 546: 545: 541: 537: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 521: 518: 517: 516: 510: 509: 500: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 472: 471: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 445: 441: 434: 430: 426: 422: 419: 418: 417: 411: 405: 402: 398: 394: 391: 385: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 370: 366: 362: 360: 357: 351: 345: 341: 337: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315: 314: 313: 308: 305: 304: 303: 297: 296: 288: 284: 279: 277: 273: 269: 264: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 248: 240: 235: 231: 227: 222: 220: 217: 216: 215: 209: 208: 200: 199: 198: 196: 192: 188: 179: 173: 169: 165: 161: 160: 159: 156: 155: 154: 148: 147: 139: 135: 131: 130: 129: 127: 123: 119: 115: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3574: 3440: 3429:Whereas the 3420:Whereas the 3411:Whereas the 3402:Whereas the 3385: 3356:— Preceding 3340: 3337: 3318: 3313: 3310: 3293: 3286: 3284: 3253: 3237:Declanjscott 3235: 3232: 3207: 3188: 3166: 3145: 3137: 3126:edit request 3110: 3092:— Preceding 3088: 3057: 3031: 2946:Saying that 2929: 2897: 2858: 2829: 2810: 2806: 2784: 2706: 2693: 2631:description? 2629: 2600:— Preceding 2583: 2579: 2565:Technical 13 2558: 2537: 2529: 2518:edit request 2456: 2435: 2369:— Preceding 2364: 2313:— Preceding 2303: 2236:— Preceding 2232: 2228: 2209: 2205: 2167: 2166: 2153: 2146: 2144: 2114: 2107: 2105: 2068: 1991:— Preceding 1986: 1944: 1926:92.68.27.155 1923: 1915: 1904:edit request 1863:— Preceding 1858: 1834: 1827: 1805: 1802: 1781: 1774: 1772: 1734: 1711:— Preceding 1708: 1704: 1681:— Preceding 1677: 1640:— Preceding 1593: 1586: 1584: 1565: 1561: 1555: 1533: 1513: 1504: 1465:— Preceding 1461: 1455: 1447: 1436:edit request 1400:— Preceding 1396: 1350: 1343: 1341: 1307: 1300: 1298: 1282: 1217: 1210: 1208: 1177: 1170: 1168: 1138: 1131: 1129: 1118:Oxford Press 1098: 1059: 988: 963:— Preceding 959: 936:— Preceding 932: 918: 914: 892: 870: 853: 812: 795: 786: 715: 691: 671: 569: 568: 512: 505: 503: 498: 437: 420: 415: 340:Progressives 299: 292: 290: 244: 211: 204: 202: 183: 150: 143: 141: 133: 112:— Preceding 109: 78: 43: 37: 3446:or perhaps 3191:GoGatorMeds 2811:hard work." 2658:Orange Mike 2651:, far less 2649:center-left 2576:Immigration 2441:Orange Mike 2401:Orange Mike 2289:Orange Mike 2210:Joan Lopus 2178:Orange Mike 2129:Orange Mike 2089:Orange Mike 2050:Orange Mike 2019:Orange Mike 1808:2CrudeDudes 1738:2.65.13.209 1289:. Further, 1193:Orange Mike 1079:Orange Mike 1036:archive.org 1020:Orange Mike 796:My name is 383:Orange Mike 349:Orange Mike 36:This is an 3362:Sporemolux 3130:|answered= 2522:|answered= 2270:Rivertorch 2072:Jpblancoii 1967:Rivertorch 1908:|answered= 1538:Rivertorch 1440:|answered= 1283:decreasing 336:Socialists 98:Archive 15 90:Archive 13 85:Archive 12 79:Archive 11 73:Archive 10 3579:TBSchemer 3571:Dave Dial 3556:Dave Dial 3542:TBSchemer 3528:Third Way 3510:Prototime 3492:Dave Dial 3478:TBSchemer 3457:TBSchemer 3431:Third Way 3422:Third Way 3413:Third Way 3404:Third Way 3392:Third Way 3295:Nidhiki05 3167:Not done: 2653:left wing 2626:Left wing 2606:Colonycat 2464:MNTRT2009 2422:MNTRT2009 2375:MNTRT2009 2155:Nidhiki05 2116:Nidhiki05 1949:RudolfRed 1945:Not done: 1869:Barnguy98 1836:parties." 1783:Nidhiki05 1595:Nidhiki05 1558:this edit 1534:Not done: 1485:Celine712 1471:Spyle2254 1352:Nidhiki05 1309:Nidhiki05 1219:Nidhiki05 1179:Nidhiki05 1140:Nidhiki05 919:Peacock28 905:jknight6 768:Gamer9832 653:Gamer9832 624:Gamer9832 574:Greg Bard 550:Gamer9832 514:Nidhiki05 477:Gamer9832 457:Gamer9832 425:Gamer9832 365:Gamer9832 301:Nidhiki05 241:Excuse me 213:Nidhiki05 152:Nidhiki05 68:Archive 9 60:Archive 5 3518:contribs 3370:contribs 3358:unsigned 3349:rights." 3281:WP:SYNTH 3094:unsigned 3058:See Also 3005:gobonobo 2961:gobonobo 2898:see also 2614:contribs 2602:unsigned 2383:contribs 2371:unsigned 2315:unsigned 2238:unsigned 2202:Birthday 2005:contribs 1997:Matgal89 1993:unsigned 1877:contribs 1865:unsigned 1713:unsigned 1683:unsigned 1642:unsigned 1556:I added 1517:itsJamie 1505:Not done 1479:contribs 1467:unsigned 1402:unsigned 1095:moderate 977:contribs 965:unsigned 950:contribs 938:unsigned 895:Jknight6 787:Abstain. 114:unsigned 106:Ideology 3598:WP:DUCK 3575:DISCUSS 3321:Nickdab 3148:Gab9953 2916:Rjensen 2816:Rjensen 2770:Rjensen 2740:Rjensen 2708:Rjensen 2341:Rjensen 1839:Rjensen 1755:Rjensen 1327:Rjensen 798:Mercy11 720:Rjensen 675:info. 497:!Votes 268:Rjensen 39:archive 3394:, and 2952:pointy 2880:Drmies 2833:Drmies 2809:hardly 2790:Drmies 2785:hardly 2755:Drmies 2716:Drmies 2699:, and 2173:burden 1570:72Dino 1063:Tezero 1056:Drugs? 969:Lyle96 942:Lyle96 875:Kai445 871:Change 854:Change 813:Delete 716:delete 692:Change 672:Delete 401:Lionel 251:Lionel 3617:Arzel 3602:Arzel 3334:1900s 3134:|ans= 3124:This 2930:twice 2735:WP:EL 2701:WP:EL 2526:|ans= 2516:This 2168:guest 1912:|ans= 1902:This 1444:|ans= 1434:This 915:Fixed 858:Ðrdak 595:Arzel 536:Arzel 440:Arzel 16:< 3621:talk 3606:talk 3583:talk 3560:talk 3546:talk 3514:talk 3496:talk 3482:talk 3461:talk 3366:talk 3325:talk 3312:part 3272:talk 3241:talk 3220:talk 3213:here 3211:and 3209:here 3195:talk 3175:talk 3171:Stfg 3152:talk 3102:talk 3073:talk 3039:talk 2998:and 2992:mine 2981:talk 2938:talk 2920:talk 2906:talk 2884:talk 2869:talk 2837:talk 2820:talk 2794:talk 2774:talk 2759:talk 2744:talk 2720:talk 2712:here 2678:talk 2664:Talk 2655:. -- 2637:talk 2610:talk 2563:{{U| 2559:Done 2544:talk 2486:talk 2468:talk 2447:Talk 2426:talk 2417:this 2407:Talk 2398:. -- 2396:this 2379:talk 2345:talk 2323:talk 2308:Talk 2295:Talk 2286:. -- 2274:talk 2246:talk 2216:talk 2184:Talk 2135:Talk 2095:Talk 2076:talk 2056:Talk 2025:Talk 2001:talk 1971:talk 1953:talk 1930:talk 1873:talk 1843:talk 1812:talk 1759:talk 1742:talk 1721:talk 1691:talk 1665:talk 1650:talk 1629:talk 1613:talk 1609:TMCk 1574:talk 1542:talk 1515:OhNo 1510:here 1489:talk 1475:talk 1410:talk 1373:talk 1331:talk 1273:talk 1255:talk 1241:talk 1199:Talk 1158:talk 1107:talk 1085:Talk 1067:talk 1044:talk 1026:Talk 1008:talk 973:talk 946:talk 899:talk 879:talk 845:talk 802:talk 772:talk 749:talk 745:R-41 724:talk 707:talk 703:R-41 681:talk 657:talk 628:talk 613:talk 599:talk 578:talk 554:talk 540:talk 481:talk 461:talk 444:talk 429:talk 389:Talk 369:talk 355:Talk 323:talk 272:talk 230:talk 191:talk 168:talk 164:R-41 122:talk 3314:y's 3288:Toa 3263:(3) 3260:(2) 3257:(1) 3132:or 2524:or 2457:not 2148:Toa 2109:Toa 1910:or 1776:Toa 1771:). 1588:Toa 1442:or 1369:TFD 1345:Toa 1302:Toa 1269:TFD 1251:TFD 1212:Toa 1172:Toa 1154:TFD 1133:Toa 677:TFD 609:TFD 507:Toa 499:are 319:TFD 294:Toa 206:Toa 197:). 145:Toa 134:and 3623:) 3608:) 3585:) 3562:) 3548:) 3520:) 3516:· 3498:) 3484:) 3463:) 3390:, 3372:) 3368:• 3327:) 3319:- 3283:. 3243:) 3222:) 3197:) 3177:) 3154:) 3138:no 3104:) 3075:) 3041:) 3002:. 2983:) 2940:) 2922:) 2908:) 2886:) 2871:) 2839:) 2822:) 2796:) 2776:) 2761:) 2746:) 2722:) 2680:) 2661:| 2639:) 2616:) 2612:• 2567:}} 2561:— 2546:) 2530:no 2488:) 2470:) 2444:| 2428:) 2404:| 2385:) 2381:• 2347:) 2325:) 2292:| 2276:) 2248:) 2218:) 2181:| 2132:| 2092:| 2086:-- 2078:) 2053:| 2022:| 2007:) 2003:• 1973:) 1955:) 1932:) 1916:no 1879:) 1875:• 1845:) 1814:) 1761:) 1744:) 1723:) 1693:) 1667:) 1652:) 1631:) 1615:) 1576:) 1544:) 1512:. 1491:) 1477:• 1448:no 1412:) 1375:) 1333:) 1275:) 1257:) 1196:| 1190:-- 1160:) 1082:| 1069:) 1046:) 1023:| 1010:) 979:) 975:• 952:) 948:• 901:) 881:) 864:) 847:) 831:, 827:, 823:, 819:, 804:) 774:) 751:) 726:) 709:) 683:) 659:) 630:) 615:) 601:) 580:) 556:) 542:) 483:) 463:) 446:) 431:) 386:| 371:) 352:| 342:, 338:, 325:) 289:. 274:) 236:). 232:) 193:) 170:) 124:) 94:→ 64:← 3619:( 3604:( 3581:( 3558:( 3544:( 3512:( 3494:( 3480:( 3459:( 3364:( 3323:( 3270:( 3239:( 3218:( 3193:( 3173:( 3150:( 3100:( 3071:( 3037:( 2979:( 2936:( 2918:( 2904:( 2882:( 2867:( 2835:( 2818:( 2792:( 2772:( 2757:( 2742:( 2718:( 2676:( 2635:( 2608:( 2542:( 2484:( 2466:( 2424:( 2377:( 2343:( 2321:( 2272:( 2244:( 2214:( 2074:( 1999:( 1969:( 1951:( 1928:( 1871:( 1841:( 1810:( 1757:( 1740:( 1719:( 1689:( 1663:( 1648:( 1627:( 1611:( 1572:( 1540:( 1487:( 1473:( 1408:( 1371:( 1329:( 1271:( 1253:( 1156:( 1065:( 1042:( 1040:B 1006:( 1004:B 971:( 944:( 897:( 877:( 862:T 860:( 843:( 800:( 770:( 747:( 722:( 705:( 679:( 655:( 626:( 611:( 597:( 576:( 552:( 538:( 479:( 459:( 442:( 427:( 367:( 321:( 270:( 228:( 189:( 166:( 120:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index