4279:
in that you quote page 199, (although the actual book is 201) is a classic example of reading a few pages of a book. I referenced the book like many other books on the topic, for two reasons, the first is that as the very quote you have quoted somewhat alludes, the book does NOT describe Third Force as a paramilitary group. Their formation on the hillside is described as parliamentary like, they are not described as a "loyalist parliamentary group" and hence with my original comment, I can assure you, you will not find any credible sources describing Third Force as a parliamentary group, even if that were
Paisley's intention (as the third ref is alluding to), but he never said 'paramilitary' and it certainly didn't materialise as one. TF was a movement of âstreet politicsâ, in the form of âpopulist activismâ and accumulated with men standing on a hillside waving gun certificates for an effective defensive look even though they were actually parliamentary papers (as the BT article illustrates, however even this article is a slight exaggeration but that is to be expected by a newspaper.) If you have actually done any scholarly research or Third Force at least beyond Knowledge you would find that the incompetence, immaturity, length and methods of TF that reportedly never so much touched a weapon in its few weeks of existence and the few days it held rallies, being described as a parliamentary group laughable. Likewise, if you knew the extent of all the rallies not just by those of Paisley throughout the Troubles and the dozens of unionist and loyalist groupings that lasted between a day and a decade which the DUP had some involvement in during a dialectically political period for unionism before 1985, you would realise how insignificant Third Force is. So, to then have Third Force included (and described wrongly) in the DUPs introduction at the top of its third paragraph is ridiculous and serves no informative purpose other than to obscure reality and imply something that it isn't. Third Force is of significance for one day during a 30year conflict and the DUPs 50yr history. It has no tangible achievement during the Troubles or more importantly to the DUP, even its harm and effects are nearly null according to any books I've read. But because of its insignificance, there is very little written about it. Hence why it is in a sentence on page 199 of a book entirely devoted to Ulster unionism. Really, a credible editor would not include TF in the intro of the DUP, unless it is an editor's intention is to smear the DUP. If it is included in the intro, despite how severely lacking it is in significance to the page subject itself (against Wiki convention), it should at least be described as the vast majority of historians and scholars describe it nothing more than 'populist activism'. To suggest it is a parliamentary organisation because the old men's formation on a hill one day was para-(resembling)-military, shows a concerning scale of naivety.
4299:
the DUP called 'The Carson Trail'". I don't see how that conforms with your claims that "the book does NOT describe Third Force as a paramilitary group" or "Their formation on the hillside is described as parliamentary like". I specifically chose not to use references that describe the man as standing in paramilitary formation or wearing paramilitary uniforms. "The men on the Antrim hillside became the nucleus of a paramilitary formation 'The Third Force'" uses the term paramilitary formation in relation to the organisation 'Third Force', not in relation to how the men were standing. The sentence makes no sense if "paramilitary formation" refers to the men standing in ranks, since what did they become the nucleus of? This is made even more clear if the passage is quoted in full, it begins on the previous page and reads "On 5 February 1981 he addressed a meeting of 500 loyalists drawn up in paramilitary formation on a hillside in North Antrim. As they waved firearms certificates in the air
Paisley proclaimed 'This is a small token of the men who are placed to devastate any attempt by Margaret Thatcher and Charles Haughey to destroy the Union.' The men on the Antrim hillside became the nucleus of a paramilitary formation the 'Third Force' which would play a role in what the DUP called 'The Carson Trail." Yes, the first use of "paramilitary formation" does refer to how the men are standing, but the second quite clearly does not.
4356:
a parliamentary group and again the books you quote do not describe it as significant to the DUP as the wiki intro suggests. Do you think I won't be aware what these books say. It appears that rather than discussing a compromise that will reflect the nature of TF perhaps later in the article more, you will just continue to defend a blanket statement "the DUP has links with loyalist paramilitary groups like TF" regardless of what I present to otherwise be the case and when know at least now you've done a bit of research is not an accurate description. Please give us credible scholars that describe TF as a paramilitary group. Don't quote one or two sentences that uses the word paramilitary and then give us your interpretation of what you want it to mean. You know your argument is weak and you are obviously just going to keep defending your position rather than put the quality of the article before your ego to win an argument. It's a shame when such editors exist.
3548:
unionist far-right but considering their electoral candidates such as the PUP flop at elections and the only viable unionist candidates in this election who could contend against SF were the DUP and UUP then obviously they are going to give them their support. And what was the DUP and UUPs response? That's right a denouncement not acceptance of their support. And yes the DUP for many years especially at the start flirted with paramilitarism however at the end of the day Big Ian was simply using them for his own ends leaving them high and dry more than once, yet that was long before the great turnaround of the
Chuckle Bros. Similarly are the Israeli Defense Forces and Irish Garda Siochana terrorist organisations considering they where founded from ones and the bulk of their early membersip were terrorists? No.
1349:
homosexuality. DUP councillor Arthur
Templeton was suspended from the DUP and sacked as an independent member of Newtownabbey's District Policing Partnership after being found guilty of harassing a gay colleague and was ordered to pay ÂŁ4,000 in damages. . Furthermore, the DUP attempted to block the Equality Act. If anyone needs anymore evidence of the DUPs standpoint on homosexuality, simple go to Google and type in 'DUP + Homophobia'. I would like to see the section (DUP and Homosexualtiy) kept though I would suggest that the content could be amended to say that several of the DUP councillors have been outspoken on this topic. The individual comments can be moved to the MLAs pages. Though there isn't one for Maurice Mills, so maybe one could be created for him? I strongly feel this section should stay. --
3097:, but you could tag it and remove it if it remains unsourced. I won't be editing the article itself, as editing political articles doesn't appeal to me, but I'm simply advising that if your own political ideals conflict with what is being reported, step aside and let others cite it, that way you don't risk falling foul, regardless of your good faith. Given the outcome of the GE2017 this article is likely to attract a lot of unwanted attention, undue and controversial claims will crop up and mount up over time. If you remove them based on your beliefs them it becomes a minefield. Best to stand clear and call admins to keep an eye on it. Be careful, this article has a 1RR warning. In the meantime, here's a source regarding how some DUP members may feel about homosexuality and AIDS:
4726:
other authors have come to 'far-right' as an overall position simply because of a select few social issues. In fact, the sources that are claiming right-wing have a far more ideological framework underpinning their writing than the sources (ie Ofcom regulated) which state centre-right have, so if anything caution should be given to the formerâs sources. Quantity of citations is also not a reason to remove other sources that give another analysis. References don't have to be either-or. Both referenced positions/analysis can coexist especially as this talk page shows, if there is a debate about the political position, include the main credible references.
3740:
conservative, and large segments of the (especially rural and older) population are characterized by a form of really old chauvinism and "delusions of grandeur" (as Nick Clegg called it) abandoned by other western
European countries a long, long time ago. So when the English press and English commentators unanimously consider something to be far-right, we can be certain that it is in fact far-right by all reasonable standards. After all, by continental western European standards, the people now in charge of the Conservative Party would themselves be considered far-right. --
3755:
going to over react and demonise anything further right than their own nose. At least Sky News and the liberal BBC have more brains and simply call the DUP "socially conservative", which is a more accurate term for them. Is the
Vatican a far-right facist state considering it is actively anti-LBGT and anti-abortion, ironically the same as the DUP? Should we add it to the first sentence of the lede of that article? Good luck. Unless you put up reliable academic sources that back your view rather than the ragtag media then the issue is over as far as I can see.
181:
popular support. The incident where
William McCrea (now South Antrim MP) appeared on a podium with Billy Wright in the mid-1990s is an example of the kind of tenacious but extant relationship the DUP has with paramilitarism. There is no need to spend a lot of time commenting on the same subject in the case of Sinn Fein since the party has a consistent stance on the paramilitarism and the IRA - although clearly the involvement of SF members in terrorism should certainly be clearly documented. - Comrade Stalin
4248:
real, that Third Force weren't paramilitary. Even ignoring that just because they weren't in possession of guns at that minute in time doesn't mean they had no guns, I'm not aware it is a requirement to actually be in possession of arms to be a paramilitary organisation especially when reliable references describe them as paramilitary. Did the
Provisional IRA cease to be a paramilitary organisation when they decommissioned their arms? How were Paisley and co planning
996:
discuss that matter. YOU were the one who started the edit war without any discussion of it. You ONLY started discussing the subject after I reported you for edit warring. I do not think you are in any position to lecture anyone on
Knowledge procedure. Yes I have been banned for edit warring in the past and I have learnt from that, and that's why I went through the proper channels this time. All you did was steam into an edit war without any intention of dialog.
31:
2442:, briefly explain why you reverted and (possibly with a link to WP:BRD) encourage the bold editor to start a discussion on the article talk page if he or she wants to learn more about why you reverted. Alternatively, start a discussion yourself on the article talk page about the issue. People feel more cooperative if you let them know that you're willing to listen to their case for the change. Otherwise, a revert can seem brusque.
1834:
results of the DUP will attest to. For example, its often cited that the DUP's draws much of its suport from the Free
Presbyterian Church - that church however has only 12,000 members yet the DUP draws nearly 250,000 votes. It is clear that the DUP attracts support from Evangelical Protestants, and the wider Protestant Community in Northern Ireland, as well as unionists who would not define themselves in terms of religion.
4249:
3773:
it's "normal" and "mainstream" to be racist, homophobic, ethnic nationalist and have links to terrorism. I vehemently reject the idea that we should ignore normal UK and European standards simply because someone is from Northern Ireland, and the views of this party are not at all "normal" or "mainstream" in the UK, and in the political context in which it participates at the national UK level. --
3485:
Christian-right as it is their religion that defines their general views on homosexuality, abortion etc. Devout Catholics must also be far-right then too I suppose? Anna Lo may be an immigrant but that is not why her poster was burnt, maybe because she is outspoken on her support for Irish unification and works heavily in the loyalist Village area of South Belfast were such views are anathema?
1722:
3214:
2960:
2596:). If we're going to deviate from that standard, the question has to be asked: why is Northern Ireland an exception to the rule? If the answer is that we believe that the abbreviation should be in bold in political party infoboxes generally â or if there is no reason that would not apply equally to articles about political parties in other countries â then that is a discussion for
3663:
regardless of what you do, although it seems some people in Northern Ireland feel they are entitled (although it's not clear why) to such special treatment. This sort of argument, "I'm racist and homophobic and ethnic nationalist, but I'm not far-right since all people in Northern Ireland are racist, homophobic etc." is frankly absurd. This party is even more extreme than the
4314:. On both diffs the quote is provided, "Dr Ian Paisley, who had been close to Bradford, called for tax and rent strikes by Loyalists and announced the formation of a new paramilitary body for which he claimed he was helping to recruit. Because it was to supplement the RUC and UDR, he called it the 'Third Force'" Are you suggesting that is not a credible reference?
1544:
racism", "DUP and the Orange Order" and any other sections that could include any other comments by otherwise-unknown councillors that might be "offensive" to anyone. It's just not something done in these articles. Better just have a general Controversy section, putting grievances under that, though not many mainstream political parties even have that either. --
3013:
3426:
The DUP, which operates within the democratic political mainstream in Northern Ireland, cannot possibly be described (other than by people with a strongly left-wing agenda) as being 'far-right'. Please remove the reference to 'far-right' and replace it with a less contentious term such as 'right-of-centre' or 'conservative unionist'.
772:
Which frankly hold no weight. I have reverted your edit warring because there is proper rationale for the category. You started the edit warring with no rationale and no comment in the talk page until I reported you. I won't be continuing an edit war. I have gone through the proper channels. And please stop the personal hyperbole.
3282:(1) Most of the content of this talk page has been removed (2) Entire sections of the DUP's history have been deleted, apparently because they cast the party in an unfavourable light. The information on the DUP's connections with paramilitaries are topical as well as encyclopaedic - I'll reinstate them if nobody disagrees ..
3394:
about and no doubt a concerted attempt is being made whether by lefties, Corbynites, republicans, Russians ;-), or whoever to try to use this page to make Theresa May's position more untenable after aligning herself with the DUP. Whilst it often is used as such, Knowledge is not meant to be a propaganda machine.
4748:
I'm not quite sure what you're saying here, but if you're arguing about the reliability of the sources, that wasn't my point. No source, no matter how reliable, can be used to justify claims it doesn't make. I was trying to figure out whether "the DUPâŠis right of centre on many issues" means the same
4339:
by Steve Bruce page 227 reads "In 1981, after the British and Irish governments had signalled a new closeness in their relationship, Paisley launched the largest of his 'third forces' (the police and the army being the first and second forces). The initiative was heavily backed by DUP members". I did
4190:
I see this has been ignored, while claiming "the references included do not describe these organisations as paramilities. Indeed no credible sources can be found to claim this". As made clear the book reference quite clearly states just that on page 199 (page 78 is of no apparent relevance to the DUP
4174:
starts right out of the gate saying "Ian Paisley flirted on the fringes of paramilitarism for a significant section of his political career, culminating in the formation of his infamous 'Third Force' â supplementing the legal forces of the Army and then RUC", so I fail to see how this contradicts the
4150:
Yes lets ignore that most Tories voted against same sex marriage in 2013 and that the most recent Lib Dem leader to stand down did so because he found it hard to reconcile his partys position on such topics with his faith and that the RC church in the UK shares the DUPs views on these topics. Yes the
3996:
actually executes homosexuals as a matter of basic legal routine, but that isn't highlighted in the introduction of those two Knowledge article. The rest of Ireland is also opposed to casually throwing babies in the waste disposal.... sorry, abortion, which English society considers some kind of holy
3898:
Editors here must bear in mind that the Guardian is a Tory/UUP/DUP-hostile left-wing (although self-described as Centre-Left) newspaper with pro-Irish Republican (and also even pro-British Republican) sympathies. The paper is about as biased as far as the DUP are concerned as you can possibly get. --
3484:
Surely if the DUP are far-right there is reliable sourcing that states they are or rather still are considering the past 15 or more years with the Chuckle Brothers. Couldn't imagine the BNP sharing power and laughing with an African immigrant. If anything the DUP can be classified as belonging to the
3393:
Page should be locked full stop and all edits requested dicussed here first and foremost with reliable and verifiable sourcing required per Knowledge policy. The UK election result has made this page a focus for false news and allegations found in left-wing media that has little clue of what it is on
2769:
Consensus among a limited group of editors, at one place and time, cannot override community consensus on a wider scale. For instance, unless they can convince the broader community that such action is right, participants in a WikiProject cannot decide that some generally accepted policy or guideline
2199:
I would safely say that the DUP enjoys far more notability and infamy than the Sudanese party. Anyways there is no need for a change considering the article starts off with a disambiguation note which directs others to the DUP disambiguation page. No problem here other than the ones Gob is inventing.
1555:
I take your points on board Great Gavini though this is such a hot topic for the DUP that I feel it should be kept. It's not just Iris Robinson, Maurice Mills & Ian Paisely Jr. It's also about comments and actions by Jeffrey Donaldson, Edwin Poots and Arthur Templeton. Three of those involved are
1366:
The Maurice Mills bit has been fixed. I'm merging the Iris Robinson and Ian Paisley Jr remarks, as per above. Mills is a councillor though, so there's no way a separate article can be created. Given his low profile, the comments could either be i) removed for lack of real notability or ii) just put
1333:
I would be of the view that it makes more sense to have this discussed on the respective MLA's pages. The alternative would be to open party pages up to long discussions on every controversial statement made by every party member. If thats the consensus in a few days I would go ahead and delete the
919:
I wrote it before yours was there but there was an edit conflict - in terms of flow your comment was absent when I wrote mine. Anyway, I'm not trying to beat people over the head with their past behaviour, but when Vexorg kicked off with accusations of edit warring and reports against me on AN/I, his
194:
OK - I might be able to push the word count to 514 (9.46%). It depends upon how you interpret the paragraphs. However, in the Sinn Fein article you must read through the entire article and distill the information. In this article there is an entirely separate and distinct subsection. Having a heading
180:
I think it's worth keeping given that the DUP spends much of it's time advocating peace and democratic means and denying links with paramilitaries. Clearly this is not the case, given the party's base vote which is drawn to a significant extent from the communities where loyalist paramilitaries enjoy
4355:
You are clutching at straws. Repeating yourself and then quoting pages that don't support your very own argument is not doing your research even if it's on Google. I responded to the other reference you cited, it suggests what paisley may have intended, not what third force was or became. It was not
3623:
Northern Ireland Politics are more or less completely different from UK (GB (E.W.S.)) Politics...NI Political parties are run on "sectarian" lines, for a start! Anyone who suggests otherwise is basically "playing silly buggers" (trying to cause mischief) here! The DUP would have been considered "Far
3173:
I removed a line about them being opposed to homosexuality and abortion, but only because the linked source mentioned neither. I've just started searching, and it does seem to be accurate that they oppose abortion. Saying they "oppose homosexuality" is less clear - they do oppose gay marriage, but
2749:
Simple. Seeing as the style used has been used unquestioned for a while on NI political party articles it can be assumed there is local consensus as noone made an issue out of it until your edit. I am the only one who made a defence of it and noone else seems to care, and to be honest I don't really
2705:
Quite a few articles on Knowledge ignore general guidelines if there is local Wikiproject consensus or passive agreement through the stability and length of the edits/styles. As stated if you want to change this article and leave it inconsistent with the other NI political party articles then by all
2678:
You fail to mention the UK parties that do not, eg, every nonâNorthern Irish party with the exception of the nationalist party in each of Scotland and Wales. But it's a moot point as what is done in Northern Irish or United Kingdom articles does not trump "the greater community's views" as described
2573:
If one in four articles do not have it in bold, that would imply that there is not a current standard. But more to the point, why are we looking solely at Northern Irish parties? Why not the United Kingdom more generally, or all political parties irrespective of country? I see no reason why Northern
1833:
The DUP's base is the unionist community in Northern Ireland which does closely correlate to the Protestant community. However, its base is much wider than just Evangelical Protestants as any comparison of census figures showing the number of Evangelical Protestants in Northern Ireland and electoral
1829:
I'm not sure how you can claim that the DUP has any 'theological' views - it may well take a view on issues such as or abortion, but quite often these views correlate very closely with Roman Catholic teaching and theology. There are no "anti-Catholic" policies espoused by the party and
1595:
Show me another political party with a track record of homophobic bigotry as bad as the DUP's, and I will agree they should have a section too. We have two sources that specifically deal with the DUP's record with regard to this in addition to the many disgraceful comments by DUP members, one source
1411:
Not really - the latter relates to Ian Paisley Jr.'s comments already mentioned in the article, plus views of unrelated parties (UUP and the Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster). The former link might be useful under the rather sparse Policies section of this article (though surely it can be sourced
1026:
My opinion is that you haven't learned, because you were party to this edit war, which as I've mentioned takes two people. Had you taken the time to send me a polite message (rather than the 'I've reported you' you eventually managed) instead of your revert of 23:56, six minutes after mine, in which
854:
I think the fact that you are edit warring and have a remarkable history of it is in fact relevant. Would it really be so hard to chill out on insisting that your addition is correct and instead of wasting people's time on AN/I, just leave a civil comment for me on my Talk to discuss the issue? Even
4298:
is 199 on Google Books as the link provided to you says clearly, whether your physical copy is a different edition is largely irrelevant and changes nothing. The quote is "The men on the Antrim hillside became the nucleus of a paramilitary formation 'The Third Force' which would play a role in what
4278:
Some credible points have already been made, some not so much. Firstly, letâs calm down the dramatizing, reverting one edit that hasn't included a rationale is not an edit war. Secondly, having a different opinion does not mean another editor is making false claims. Regarding the book I referenced
3981:
I realise that the (English) public spotlight is now on the DUP and so the largely insignificant things that outrage them are now been emphasised in the article, but it seems bizarre to place front and center in the introduction the DUP's opposition to homosexuality and abortion as if that is their
3965:
The DUP have never said the Pope is the anti-Christ, the party founder Ian Paisley (now deceased) who is a firebrand Calvinist preacher stated it, even if abusing his seat in the European parliament to launch his famous tirade against the Pope. I have never heard the 2 party leaders since him utter
3837:
There is already voices in NI itself hitting out in the local press about this demonising of the DUP via over-exaggeration and outright lies. On a party that is now subject to intense scrutiny and discussion throughout the UK, Knowledge needs to ensure that it does not become a propaganda weapon by
3772:
As I said, this political party is active in UK politics, by taking part in elections to the House of Commons and the formation of a government for the UK, so how it's perceived in a UK perspective is more relevant than how it's perceived locally in a tiny area, Northern Ireland, where people claim
3694:
I'm not sure that the term "far-right" or "far-left" (which some have also incorrectly tried to push on the Provisional Sinn FĂ©in article) are particularly relevant in a north of Ireland context, unless we are talking about explicit fascists and communists. It also has to be taken into account that
3425:
I was shocked to see the highly contentious and left-leaning Daily Dot article used as an authoritative source for describing the DUP as 'far-right'. The term 'far-right' is generally applied to political groupings with a strongly statist, anti-democratic and often virulently anti-immigrant stance.
2484:
I would have hoped that you would have looked at the impact of each of the edits rather than blanketly reverting without an edit summary â and I would have hoped that when you realized your mistake, you would have taken it upon yourself to correct it. Regardless, I have since reinstated that change
1206:
The lead-paragraphs (and possibly later in the article) need to be update the reflect the status after the last EU elections - i.e. the fact that the 'Progressive Union Voice' or whatever it is called doesn't have a seat any more, and the DUP does once again. I would do it, but I'm not really up on
771:
Stop making false claims, I am not being aggressive whatsoever. The DUP are notably anti-homosexual as is proven in the article itself. You on the other hand have no other ammunition apart from personal comments and really, using my banning history speaks volumes about the weight of your arguments.
488:
This is so a person from the BUA, DUP or anyone else can come onto this discussion page and clarify for me if they were aware of the link between the BUA and the DUP because of "the South Down DUP band" which according to Sinn Fein MLA Philip Mcguigan was "listed to appear alongside an organisation
404:
As Chairman of the Democratic Unionist Party's Student Association at Queens I can vouch that in the past there have been Catholic members of our association, furthermore there is absolutly nothing in the party rules to say that Roman Catholics or indeed members of any other religion could not join
4387:
You are saying one thing and then quoting another that backs my own point. It's appearance on the day was paramilitary they are not saying it is a recognised paramilitary group. No scholar would be that naive and simplistic. If you are ok with "the DUP has links with paramilitary groups such as...
4130:
While I don't object to emphasizing the anti-Irish views etc., I think it would also be totally appropriate to use a single sentence in the lead to mention its opposition to abortion and homosexuality. Its views on abortion and homosexuality are very much at odds with mainstream opinion in the UK.
3580:
If you want to argue that they are far-right in terms of maihstream UK political context you would also need reliable sourcing putting it into proper context not sticking it straight into the lede as if it is undisputed and in all contexts. Surely there are more brains on this site who know how to
3513:
The term is reliably sourced and belongs in the article. It is widely considered by reliable sources as such. I'm editing this article from the perspective of British national politics as it relates to its participation in the formation of a government for the whole of the UK rather than how it is
1064:
After your first revert I started this very talk section and put 'see talk' in the history. You completely ignored it for your next 2 reverts. It was clear you were not intending to discuss this and were only edit warring. That's why I eventually reported you. You are in no position to bleat about
960:
I don't think you have much weight to talk about 'constructive debate' You entered into an edit war with NO intention of constructive debate. You made 3 reverts without commenting in thsi talk page whatsoever. It was only after I reported you, you realised that you'd better say something. You then
370:
i wouldnt that what it is The debate earlier in the page sums this one up - The DUP has had members who have been Roman Catholics and there is evidence to suggest that some (albeit very small) support is from Roman Catholics. The Party has no rules to prevent support from, or membership from those
4725:
Again, I'm afraid your opinion on credible sources i.e. âNot sure either of those mean the same thing as an overall position of "centre-right" does not justify removing credible sources with repeated claims. Especially when by your own confession you're ânot sureâ. It is not much different to how
4247:
I believe (although I cannot say for sure since Cbowsie won't discuss their edit) I understand the supposed relevance of the Belfast Telegraph reference now. The argument appears to be as the men on the Antrim hillside didn't have any guns with them, and the firearms certificates weren't actually
4035:
Not the point - they aren't held by any other party who holds seats at the UK Parliament, so therefore they are bound to be the subject of intense scrutiny, as indeed they already have been, as a quick Google News will show (I'm surprised their misogynistic outlook hasn't been mentioned, probably
1940:
I would suggest centre-right as opposed to right-wing. As it says on the tin, they support the democratic process (well at least they did until they entered into power-sharing with a minor vote party). Anyway the implication of 'right wing' is far right, or fascist, which much as many republicans
1154:
I still disagree. I don't think a party or organisation's views have to be primary in order for it to be worthy of a category. I think it has to be notable. There are no doubt homophobes in all parties and of course all parties don't warrant being included in this category, but it's a notable and
995:
Please stop being so patronising. If anyone is not chilled it yourself. Look at your personal comments. I made no personal comments against you. You were the one who steamed in and reverted by initial edit with no rationale whatsoever for doing so. I then reverted and created this talk section to
881:
Actually it's considered bad etiquette to use an editor's previous blocks against them in this manner. Blocks are never to be considered punitive, and you are using them as a hammer to win your argument. That's a no-no. BTW I refactored your comment as its positioning lost the chronological flow.
445:
Paisley's approach at this stage was to advocate stern security policies...but instead of calling for the return of Stormont he became an integrationist, one of those rare Unionists who believed a new Stormont would tend to separate Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. It was an interesting
4577:
On it's political position, I would argue that the DUP should be classified as "right-wing" instead of "centre-right to right-wing." The politics of the DUP (socially at least) seem to be closer to that of UKIP (a party classified as "right to far right), rather than the Conservatives (which are
4403:
No, I am not. I recommend you learn about nouns and adjectives and how they work, then perhaps you won't keep thinking an adjective applies to a noun at the other end of a sentence. There are two very reliable references cited in the article that clearly and unambiguously refer to Third Force as
3754:
Tataral you have Irish unionist and nationalist editors here agreeing that the DUP are not far-right in the sense you and others with little understanding of NI assume. That says something about your argument. Your English commentators are also left-wing sensationalist media, which of course are
3480:
You might find an effigy or two in Belfast but usually of Gerry Adams or someone similar, yet it is rare to find effigies on bonfires over here and Belfast is well Belfast, a joke to everywhere else. Republican electoral posters and Irish flags are the norm but you don't need to be far-right for
1929:
last night and the DUP's more general position on matters like abortion, and so forth (despite what may be thought by the evangelical Christians who picketted their conference in protest at the DUP not doing enough to stop civil partnerships!) I seriously doubt many would consider the
1574:, for example) but that still does not make the article a soapbox for a list of criticisms of the party. Looking at the G.O.P. article, and those of similar parties, there is not a single article that has a "x and homosexuality" section. None. Nor is it likely that any other article will. --
317:
Isn't it a tad silly to have both "right-wing" and "conservative"? Just simple "Conservative", would seem to do the job. That being said, only the presence of the word "populist" in the description of the ideology serves to separate the description from that of the UUP's. Perphaps something like
3547:
The terrorism argument is a red herring and shows your lack of understanding of politics here. Considering SF is accepted as the political wing of the IRA then surely Jeremy Corbyn is a terrorist supporter considering his friendship with SF. Loyalist paramilitary groups can be classified as the
1805:
I've included the DUP in the category protestant political parties, because it is included in Paul Freston (2004) Protestant Political Parties Aldershot (Ashgate), pp.47-51. He calls the party the "y far the most important example of a Protestant party in the UK". He cites three reasons: 1) its
1543:
No, unless you can find other articles with " and homosexuality" with a record of comments of members at local/council level. Additionally, we'd presumably need "DUP and the Roman Catholic Church", "DUP and the Free Presbyterian Church", "DUP and paramilitaries", "DUP and neo-nazism", "DUP and
1155:
significant part of the DUP. Anyway I'm not going to bust a gut over it and will pursue a narrower category as per your suggestion; 'Homophobic Politial Parties' - I believe it's of encyclopaedic interest to list those parties which have a significant support of prejudice against homosexuality.
4371:
I am repeating what references say, rather than being in denial about what they say. You have two sources that describe Third Force as paramilitary, one of them provided by you! Third Force are already covered later on in the article, which is why they are also in the lead as it summarises the
4000:
No, the primary political platform of the DUP and the biggest controversy surrounding it, is rearguard imperialism and colonial self-justification, with all that entails. That is what should be emphasised in the introduction of the article, along with its deeply ingrained strains of anti-Irish
1130:
Because if it were the Democratic Homophobia Party then it would be appropriate. It's not what the party is about, regardless of the apparent weight given to the issue in the article. Homophobia is not an official part of their manifesto and I'm not convinced that the whole party is homophobic
3662:
When a party is racist, homophobic, ethnic nationalist, has links to terrorism and promotes a far-right version of ultra conservatism, it's far-right, regardless of whether it's in Northern Ireland or in England. Being in Northern Ireland doesn't mean you get a free pass from normal standards
4170:, while adding two sources (obviously credible, since they were added by the same editor. Page 199 of the book cited reads "The men on the Antrim hillside became the nucleus of a paramilitary formation 'The Third Force' which would play a role in what the DUP called 'The Carson Trail'". The
2402:
If you are going to vindicate your restoring of the challenged edit by stating "Unexplained revert. If you have specific concerns, I am happy to discuss." - then at least provide an edit-summary that provides your vindication, for example "Removing post-nominal letters from the infobox per
2290:
If you are going to vindicate your restoring of the challenged edit by stating "Unexplained revert. If you have specific concerns, I am happy to discuss." - then at least provide an edit-summary that provides your vindication, for example "Removing post-nominal letters from the infobox per
3739:
Although London society is relatively liberal and generally comparable to other western European urban societies, I don't consider English society overall to be "extremely" liberal. By western European standards, English society, especially outside London and some other cities, is fairly
1348:
Firstly, I should point out that there are controversial remarks by 3 individuals, Iris Robinson, Ian Paisley Jr and Maurice Mills. Secondly, the Katrina comments had everything to do with homosexuality as Maurice Mills made direct reference to the Katrina disaster being a consequence of
211:"While the DUP refuse to engage with Sinn FĂ©in on the basis that they are associated with the IRA, it has never had a problem in dealing with any of the small loyalist parties directly associated with paramilitary groups, often helping elect their representatives to public office"
4334:
by Feargal Cochrane, page 261 reads " Foster went on to say that the DUP had found so much fault with the Dublin communique they had mounted the Carson trail rallies and formed the Third Force in order to prevent the Thatcher-Haughey plans being implemented". In addition there is
3558:
I concur. The page as it currently stands does not reflect the position of their policies or actions in the context of UK politics. If the British National Party are described as "far right" on wikipedia, without dispute (which they are) then the DUP certainly should be as well.
461:
Interesting. He opposed the closure of Stormont before 1972 and by the late 70's. I think he was advocating devolving security to a reconstituted Stormont. I don't think integrationalism was ever a serious policy. The only person who has been consistently integrationalist is
3576:
Reliable sources are needed not personal opinion and the over-blown/exaggerated claims of leftist media outlets like the Independent. Mainstream UK media hasn't got a single iota of understanding of NI politics and it clearly shows. And I don't even vote, support or like the
1614:
as having a track record of what you call "homophobic bigotry", though you are very unlikely to get a "Republican Party and homosexuality" section - it just does not warrant a section. But "two sources"? One is from a news site of a homosexual organisation, the other is an
3846:, which makes interesting reading). It was also pointed out that during Gordon Brown's premiership he held discussions with the DUP with the prospect of forming a majority. They are that far right even Labour courted them and the DUP haven't changed much in that short time.
492:
Since the BUA says it is not neo Nazi and doesn't support the Neo nazi Combat 18 while the Sinn Fein MLA says the BUA is neo Nazi I want people to come onto this discussion page to clarify these accusations as to whether or not the BUA is supportative or against neo-Nazism.
1748:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
2313:
However in regards to "what part of the MOS", there are different MOS's throughout Knowledge and each project area is different and whilst many are written in stone, some are founded in consistency. In this case the MOS I am basing my view on is consistency. For example:
1502:) for a real example of supposed "whitewashing". A party with a platform against homosexual marriage, with a history of controversial comments from members from federal to local level, yet not alluded to (except in the individuals' articles). Yet I move two passages to
162:
article, not to remove content from it. Is there any specific part of the "loyalist paramilitaries" section you object to? (I disagree with your assessment of the Sinn FĂ©in article by the way -- I count 573 words devoted to links or sympathies between SF and the IRA.)
1642:
There are ample BBCNews sources for most of these since pinknews is unacceptable for the great gavini. I've previously provided links to BBCNews for Ian and Iris and Maurice (this is from a protestant website) in the article. I've found one for Arthur Templeton
2043:
None of the other main NI parties have any mention of their views on homosexuality. It's given undue weight here and I think should be removed. Ditto creationism. I do think the section on the Belfast Agreement is significant and should remain. What do others
4578:
classified as "centre-right). Also, on all of the citations for the centre-right aspect, instead of being explicitly called "centre-right," the DUP is described as "right of centre." On one of the citations, it also calls the party "right-wing."~~Dylan109~~
4191:
or the 'Third Force' that was actually formed in 1981), as does the other book reference I have added. I suggest Cbowsie stops edit warring based on his false claims that the references don't describe them as "paramilities" , when in fact they do just that..
1979:
Despite all political parties in existence having some controversies, there isn't usually a section like this on a Knowledge page. Eg, UK Conservatives, UK Labour, Sinn Fein etc, do not have a similar section despite having plenty of controversy themselves?.
2786:
be sought to bring an article into compliance with the MOS. Unless it is proven that it is an exceptional circumstance, the presence or absence of a local consensus is irrelevant as it cannot override a consensus of the broader community. But anyway, there
2028:
I don't know what it was like before but it still seems POV to list just 3 items under ideology and views, especially as I can't be the only person to think 'creationism' is unimportant. Shouldn't a full range of policies be listed, either that or none of
505:
The only evidence for the allegations seem to come from a Sinn FĂ©in MLA... The DUP and SF have been claiming the other has connections to extremists for a long time now, so...pinch? Salt? BUA's response would be worth citing though, wherever it is. --
2238:
Un-bolding the initialism in the infobox. I see no justification for why that one field would be in bold, nor do I see justification for why the formatting of the initialism in this article should deviate from the infobox default. Why is this a unique
3088:
Knowledge does not work based on what editors "believe" as that is a form of bias. You either need to challenge claims or find sources to support/contradict them; since a political party is an entitiy not a person BLP policy won't apply either, per
216:
That definitely needs to be properly cited, yes. I've marked it with the {{fact}} template for the moment, it should be removed if nobody can find a specific incident where the DUP helped one of the loyalist-paramilitary-linked parties get elected.
4131:
What Black Kite said above, that these views "aren't held by any other party who holds seats at the UK Parliament," is precisely the point. Whether their views are considered "normal" in Ireland is not the point as long as this party is active in
2500:
However in regards to "what part of the MOS", there are different MOS's throughout Knowledge and each project area is different and whilst many are written in stone, some are founded in consistency. In this case the MOS I am basing my view on is
2272:
wrote the following in his or her edit summary: "also this is the mos used for the other parties so why should DUP be different". To what part of the MOS are you referring? And, again I ask, what concerns do you have with each of these edits?
1131:
anyway, just certain key members. I don't think a generic categorisation of "homophobia" is appropriate for a generic political party like this. As I stated above though, I do feel that the argument is stronger if the category was narrowed. --
753:
As a political party they are not defined by homophobia, and this is not an appropriate category for them, any more than it is for the Catholic Church. I do suggest you chill out on the edit warring however, you are exceptionally aggressive.
1806:
founders included presbyterian clergymen, like Paisley, 2) it is fiercly anti-catholic on basis of protestant theological views 3) the DUP has its electoral base in evangelical protestantism. I believe these are valid reasons for inclusion.
3518:
in Northern Ireland, in very hard-right small rural communities (I have no interest in Irish politics), and from that perspective it is regarded by reliable sources as a far-right, homophobic, racist, climate change-denying extremist party
237:
is being ignored. Perhaps the same points could be made, but with reduced detail? Also, how relevant is one quote about the DUP fom Mitchell Reiss, compared to thousands upon thousands of quotes from thousands of quotes about the DUP other
4061:
I also agree it should be more prominent within the article. I personally think we should only talk about mentioning in lead once this aspect has been fleshed out within the article, so to speak, but I'm willing to be convinced otherwise.
4671:
Two of the sources use the term "right of centre". Business Insider says "very much right of centre" and BBC says "right of centre on many issues". Not sure either of those mean the same thing as an overall position of "centre-right".
4273:
Glad to this being discussed, rather than reverting edits without leaving a reason for doing so. Perhaps next time you could tag me so that I am aware of the discussion, but thanks for leaving a comment on my own talk page to make me
4232:
which all detail the DUP's paramilitary connections. While they don't mention Third Force there are many books that do, and as I have stated above the two books currently cited clearly and unambiguously call Third Force paramilitary.
4205:
What's more, though not as easily citable, one whole episode of the recent BBC Spotlight "The Troubles" series was about DUP's association with the UDA, about as transparently thin as Sinn FĂ©in's 'distance' from the Provisional IRA.
1682:
of various one-off incidents to present a particular view about the DUP and homosexuality. By including what sources have said about the party as a whole rather than individual members, that's not the case any more. More to follow.
2750:
either. As already said go on ahead and make the change as long as you are consistent and do all the rest so there is some consistency, thus discussion over. If someone else reverts you then maybe local consensus does need sought.
4112:
referenced as a good starting point, and I would personally put that under its own section in the "policies and views" section. Sammy Wilson's comments, which are already mentioned in the article, should be put under there too.
247:
The article also mentions the "Antrim PRO" and "Gary Blair". Is this the same person? I think it might be. A source is needed here, and if it does turn out to be the same person then it should be mentioned in one place and not
4749:
thing as the claim we're making using it as a citation for, which is "the DUP's political position is centre-right". Unless the answer there is an obvious "yes", we can't use it as a source for that claim; to do so would be
4686:- but that's only one source, and an American one at that, so I wouldn't trust it over other sources for British politics. It's also the exact same wording as our infobox, both then and now, so I'm a little suspicious of
3527:
puts it, and as "crackpots" as other British newspapers describe it, and most sources and commentators express shock that the Conservative Party would cooperate with such a party. It or its hard-right views are certainly
4252:
without arms? Those questions are largely irrelevant anyway, since reliable references describe Third Force as paramilitary so there's no point making up a definition and claiming Third Force don't meet that definition.
1236:
Ah - Good point. However maybe a tweak to the grammar is neccessary? I understand that it was 'the DUPs sole member of parliament' at the time, but it still reads like he remains the sole DUP member of the parliament.
3174:
the leader of the party has also said that gays are welcome in the party, and they do not appear to currently be in favor of outlawing homosexuality. (This is a position that they have held historically, I believe.)--
2016:
It should be integrated into relevant sections on 'History' and 'Ideology', into which all the 'Controversies' in this article fall neatly. I will now divide it up, but it's obviously not enough to guarantee NPOV, as
1481:
I apologise - I did not see the latter part of what Quarkstorm had written. But "homophobic bigotry is endemic within the DUP"? That (in a NPOV state) is for sources to decide - the article's not supposed to be a
3841:
Indeed it was pointed out in one paper that it is rich to deride the DUP for its gay marriage stance considering in its second and third readings in parliament, a majority of Conservative MPs voted against it (see
1816:
No doubt. Could you make a reference to it in the introduction, wherein the (apt) source that you provide could be cited? Then, it would be clear to all readers and editors that the categorisation is justified.
3613:
If a more indepth statement is in the body of the article detailing it then it is not needed to be such in the lede as the lede is to summarise the article. If it isn't then it needs restored or put in the body.
4756:
That being said, I'm not very well-versed in the terminology here, so what isn't obvious to me may be obvious to other editors. I'll leave centre-right in for now, and see if anyone else shows up with thoughts.
3695:
English society (which is who we are really talking about when we are talking about "UK standards") is extremely liberal and their cultural "standards" are quite different to other countries. For instance, both
147:
article - a party who are undeniably linked to the IRA - where 132 words out of 5431 words in article body (2.43%) are devoted to rebublican paramilitary links. Hmmm... something is just a BIT out of line here!
3581:
deal with such situations such as a paragraph at the end of the lede or a criticism sectio where allegations and claims of so called far-right can be explained in this mainstream UK context being stated here.
2527:. While some standards in particular subject areas can be determined by a local consensus, they do not, as a general rule, override the codification of what you describe as "the greater community's views" (see
1305:
Knowledge doesn't have sections in other parties' articles about controversial remarks by individual (2?) members, simply because they are on the same subject (cf. Sinn FĂ©in/paramilitaries, Tories/racism, etc.
4435:
195:
of "Links with loyalist paramilitaries" implies a PoV in itself, and as a first step propose the heading to be removed. Perhaps this also suggests the need for a separate section on paramilitary links in the
673:- Just becuase I have been previously infracted for edit warring does not give the other edit warrior an advantage. I given proper rationale for the addition of the category and used the talk page. The user
794:
Homophobia is not an appropriate category for this article, but there's nothing to stop you creating a new category "Homophobic political parties" and then listing it as a sub category under "Homophobia".
76:
On Friday , the Northern Ireland Office said it "completely rejected any allegation that the police operation in October 2002 was for any reason other than to prevent paramilitary intelligence gathering".
3189:
exactly why has 'centre right' been added in the wake of the election? their policies havent changed - so it seems to just be an attempt to sanitise a party who are clearly on the right, not the centre
1930:
party as "left wing on social issues". What is clearer is that the DUP has an interventionist approach, though political discourse in Northern Ireland is rarely dominated by debates about such matters.
3819:. I'd keep an eye on this one, as I can imagine some British politicians, and possibly some in the media â rightly or wrongly â describing the party as such for as long as May is beholden to them. But
3049:
The cached version of this page (the one visible to logged-out users) was stuck referring to the DUP as a "pro catholic bashing" party and other related non-NPOV. I've purged it but keep an eye out. -
2706:
means go to the appropriate WikiProject and seek local consensus or maybe just be consistent and alter all the articles. I will not object to your edits if the articles are consistent with each other
3403:
Outright and deliberate high-profile political vandalism which resulted in absolutely no action being taken, as yet...I wonder why?! This whole site has been losing the plot for quite some time! --
2235:. (I should also note that, strangely, Arlene Foster's post-nominal letters linked to an article about the office to which they relate, whereas Lord Murrow and Nigel Dodds' link to their biography.)
424:. I'm pretty sure the party was founded in October 1971 but Paisley was an "integrationist" in 1972. Taking this into account, is the claim that the DUP has been "consistently devolutionist" true?--
86:
Police sources earlier reiterated that the "Stormontgate" affair began because "a paramilitary organisation was involved in the systematic gathering of information and targeting or individuals".
3155:
Me too, started one but don't know much about them. The sources listed under the ideology heading in the info box offers more material to pad this out with but I've got to get back to work :)
3098:
2531:). (To clarify, naturally there are exceptions to guidelines such as the MOS, but no evidence has been provided that this is an exceptional circumstance with respect to any MOS violations.)
4372:
article. Given the DUP were instrumental in the formation of two paramilitary organisations, I fail to see how simply leaving one of them out of the lead entirely is accurate or neutral.
4151:
UK mainstream is entirely 100 per cent pro same-sex marriage and abortion etc. A sentence is suffice yes but don't try to pretend NI is totally at odds with GB when that is not the case.
855:'See Talk' as an edit summary would have been more constructive. It really wouldn't have been hard. There's an aggressive and time-wasting way to resolve disputes and a constructive one.
3093:, just the standard policies regarding providing sources for all claims. If claims go against your personal beliefs than it's probably best not to edit it, as that could be considered a
3520:
542:
My site has a full copy of the DUP manifesto. They're almost all contained within PDF files on the DUP website. Declaring my interest: I own the site so shouldn't add the link myself.
523:
Anyone know the source for the list of DUP spokespersons at Westminster? Plus I've added a separate list for the Assembly - feel free to fill in the blanks as it needs completing.--
4135:
politics, and as long as reliable sources highlight these views. If you can't stand the heat of the UK press and the UK Parliament, don't stand for election to the UK Parliament. --
3590:
Having suggested that I see the end of the second paragraph in the lede already states that the DUPs opponents see them as far-right, though with no sourcing as to which opponents.
1698:
I think the section is valid, and by the same standards I don't suppose anyone will object to me adding comments allegedly supporting murder and violence on the Sinn Fein article?
4555:
4078:
You prefer the solution in the Republic, CS, where we apparently section pregnant, raped teenagers in order to prevent them from accessing legal abortion services? Good to know.
3481:
that, the parallel republican bonfires burn unionist electoral posters and loyal flags, are they far-right? Would be ironic as they always leant towards Marxism and the far-left.
485:
User: Political Dweeb here wants to give an explanation. I am responsible for creating the paragraphs on the Democratic Unionist Party's link with the British Ulster Alliance.
1174:
143:
This section is implies an extreme amont of PoV to this article. 382 out of 1033 words in the main article body (36.98%) are devoted to this topic. If one compares this to the
2381:
If you want to change article then you'll need to change all of these ones as well and for that you'd need to take the matter to the relevant WikiProjects to seek consensus.
4302:
You then repeat your claim that "I can assure you, you will not find any credible sources describing Third Force as a parliamentary group". This is despite me directing you
1030:
Anyway, that will be my last Knowledge edit for a while, this stuff is all so tedious and school-boy debating society, such a terrible waste of time. Good luck to you all.
2100:
Can there be another section added to this article about unsubstantiated rumors that DUP is moving toward getting the British out of Ireland and ending Nanny Ireland? -
1826:
Its founders included presbyterian clergy - could also apply to the Ulster Unionist Party which although founded as a 'Council' - was founded by people, including Clergy.
1177:
it was speedily deleted. All I can suggest is that you create an RFC on this to get a much wider range of voices. You never know, you may gain the consensus you need. --
4171:
2643:. Other smaller NI parties have no elected representatives in their "top team" to compare with. Even the two main parties south of the border use post-nominal letters:
2356:. Other smaller NI parties have no elected representatives in their "top team" to compare with. Even the two main parties south of the border use post-nominal letters:
3823:
and should not be putting this in the article as of yet, IMO. You need to have a number of reliable sources calling the DUP "far-right", not just personal conjecture.
4404:
paramilitary. They aren't simply talking about men standing in paramilitary ranks or wearing paramilitary uniforms, no matter how much you'd prefer it if they were.
2005:'Controversy' sections are always created by critics of whatever party or person the article concerns. They are fundamentally opposed to Knowledge's core policy of
828:
While a "Homophobic political parties" subcategory is a decent idea, I still disagree that this article is not appropriate for inclusion in the homophobia category.
2897:
2893:
2879:
1412:
outside of "Pink News"?). Incidentally, the creationism thing does not really warrant a separate section and would do well under the Policies section too. --
1877:
4428:
1627:, and reporting these comments in each MP's and MLA's respective articles, but even this is unusual in these types of articles (though I would support it).
1619:
of a left-leaning paper. Yes, they are relatively acceptable sources, but no matter how "disgraceful" etc. Domer48, BigDunc, etc. feel it is, Knowledge is
3624:
Right" if they were an active political party (or also politically active) in England, Wales or Scotland, but they are not (and never were), are they?! --
2407:" instead of just "Removing post-nominal letters from the infobox". Also please follow the incredibly well accepted and followed Knowledge guidelines of
2430:
Not every edit summary explicitly cites which guideline mandates the edit â I have no doubt that you follow the same practice. With respect to the essay
2295:" instead of just "Removing post-nominal letters from the infobox". Also please follow the incredibly well accepted and followed Knowledge guidelines of
1275:
So judging by the article the DUP wasn't involved in the 2010 UK general election at all or nobody cares enough about the party to update the article.
4225:
4229:
4006:
1625:
The DUP has been criticised for comments offensive to homosexuals among its members, from MPs {source}, through MLAs {source} to councillors {sources}
1880:
2994:
4675:
The last source cited is a table entry in a book from 2007, which is a long enough time I don't think it's reliable for a party's current views.
3716:
3568:
3541:
3508:
3445:
2523:. A manual is not simply a construct you discern â it is a literal document. There are not "different MOS's throughout Knowledge". There is one:
920:
own behaviour became rather pertinent. Eventually slapping a warning template on my talk page along with 'I've reported you for edit warring' is
446:
theory but at the time there were few Unionist takers for it, and eventually Paisley would quietly abandon it and return to more familiar ground.
3063:
Edits were made to the 'Policy' section with regards to these topics. I believe that these may, at least in part, be non-genuine and unfounded.
270:
or some random weblog though. I think the Mitchell Reiss quote should stay; as the official US envoy to NI, his opinion carries a lot of weight.
4388:
Third Force" given the research you have now done on and which you quote yourself, then editorial standards are very low and perhaps sinister.
1458:
Firstly, those comments were made before sources showing homophobic bigotry is endemic within the DUP were provided. Secondly Quarkstorm said
4666:
Please refrain from deleting references in order to support your view of a politcal party. A more nuanced debate in the talk page is required
2792:
2727:
2692:
2597:
2446:
2274:
1956:
Maybe it would be better to simply drop this line from the infobox. I think it doesn't properly encapsulate DUP policies and is misleading.--
1942:
1857:
318:
putting "hardline" before unionist, or even using "Loyalist" would be better, but that brings up concerns about NPOV. Any other suggestions?
3988:
These two positions held by the DUP are, after all, also held by most of the rest of the world outside of Western Europe and North America.
2147:
I think that would only be necessary if there was confusion with another Democratic Unionist Party. I'm not aware of this being a problem.--
4033:
These two positions held by the DUP are, after all, also held by most of the rest of the world outside of Western Europe and North America.
3843:
3696:
3305:
1990:
1905:
In the infobox it says right wing, I seem to remember a quote (from the foundation of the DUP?) something along the line that it was to be
574:
3997:
and sacred right. And despite recent attempts at a pro-abortion "colour revolution", that isn't going to change in Ireland any time soon.
1447:
believes it should be discussed on the individual MLA articles, not here, implying a merge. What exactly do you claim has no backing? --
400:
You can't be certain that there are absolutely none The DUP do not allow catholics to join the party but they want htem to vote for them
4221:
3900:
3625:
3441:
3404:
3379:
3343:
2997:
1841:
127:
Knowledge:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Great_Britain_at_the_Olympics_to_Category:Great_Britain_and_Northern_Ireland_at_the_Olympics
4777:
I also consider the 2007 book unacceptable, if they truly are centre-right it should be simple enough to cite more recent references.
3838:
anti-Tories and the such, and so something like this needs proper citation from something better than select press/media commentators.
3289:
2628:
2624:
2555:
2551:
2469:
I will accept that this edit is actually OK and am willing to agree to it. Initially it looked like a blanking out of the party's URL.
2341:
2337:
2326:
2322:
226:
Theoretically, the DUP and the loyalists compete for votes so it is factually wrong to say that they assist loyalists in this respect.
4796:
1115:
what is your rationale for removing the category. The article clearly shows a party agenda of anti-homosexuality from the top down.
726:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#Edit_warring_on_Democratic_Unionist_Party_.28Result:_.29
3156:
2991:
please change the number of seats the DUP holds in the Northern Ireland assembly from 38 to 28 after the election on march 2nd 2017
2165:
1873:
1282:
126:
3599:
That sentence cited specific sources for each claim, which were then removed by an editor and turned into a more vague sentence. --
4797:"The partyâs electoral college is expected to confirm the decision on Saturday, with the partyâs executive ratifying it next week"
2129:
4633:
3808:
3029:
2578:
1983:
It just seems rather out of place to me, and seems as if a group of people with an agenda against the DUP created this section.
1787:
1611:
1487:
1869:
4622:
4548:
3803:
has been making here, and am not claiming that the party should be labelled as "far-right", but it is interesting to note that
2636:
2349:
2010:
2006:
671:"you are the one who has been banned four times in the last three months for edit warring. I suggest you take your own advice."
564:
Could someone add a bit about the comments made by Mervyn Storey last August about teaching creationism in science classrooms?
4593:
3094:
2601:
1774:
1728:
322:
My suggestions would be "sectarian bigots". And theres no point in denying this, becasue thats essentially what they are. (
47:
17:
2831:
4679:
3133:
Indeed! I thought exactly the same thing when I came to this article to find out more about this party in the aftermath of
2074:) 17:15, 22 May 2014 (UTC) (the text on the Belfast Agreement has been retained and incorporated in the history section) --
1318:"recently" (...one year, two years time?) and "gay people" ("homosexuals" would suffice, surely?) would need to be changed.
106:
Demiurge, guess whose house the documents were found in? For a bonus point, that person has since admitted working for...?
4052:
4014:
3700:
3504:
4013:
has in the past described a UDA proposal to ethnically cleanse the native Irish population from areas of the north as a "
3916:
I wanted to call the DUP Christian right, because I think that clarifies a range of its positions... why was it removed?
3703:
are institutionally opposed to abortion on demand, despite yelps and howls from the UN, the hysterical English press and
1623:
for analysing political parties' psyches - it is not something that is done. Yes, it is possible to include a note like
4764:
4697:
4563:
4443:
3564:
3375:
Someone needs to edit this page to remove the mural photograph. It's a fake - photoshopped. the original mural is here:
3099:
Independent: Why is the DUP so controversial? The party's stances on abortion, gay marriage and climate change explained
2940:
1495:
1371:
extend outside homosexuality thing - the internal factions, any paramilitary related things, etc.) Any suggestions? --
4047:
That should definitely be more prominent in the article. Btw I think you are taking Sammy Wilsons quote out of context.
4629:
4175:
idea that Third Force was paramilitary. I have restored the existing wording, since it is quite obviously referenced.
3959:
3925:
3890:
2652:
2365:
1783:
1301:
I'm merging bits of this section to each respective MLA's own article, unless anyone can justify its creation, since:
337:
The DUP, at this minute, is not the biggest party in Westminister. The UUP is one up. The DUP is the largest party in
4022:
3712:
3465:
Don't loyalist 12th July bonfires attended by prominent DUP members include effigies of Catholics, nationalists, and
434:
Do you have a source for Paisley being an integrationalist in 1972? He opposed the closure of Stormont in the 70's.
4093:
on personal views on abortion and LGBT rights. But I do agree that the focus on LGBT and abortion rights is a very
3812:
2640:
2415:
rather than edit-warring over it by reinserting on a whim regardless of the greater community's views on your edit.
2353:
2303:
rather than edit-warring over it by reinserting on a whim regardless of the greater community's views on your edit.
1631:, for instance, has something like 3 lines on its links with the IRA (!), summed up by a Danny Morrison quote. --
1596:
The Great Gavini has not even read properly. The section may need some tweaking and expanding, but it should stay.
1491:
725:
371:
who are Roman Catholics therefore there is no justification to describe the DUP as a 'Protestant' political party.
133:
38:
593:
FYI: I have restored the Homophobia category. The DUP is notably anti-homosexual, as cited by the article itself.
4010:
3966:
anything similar. Just because he said it and some of the party agree with him does not mean it ismparty policy.
3195:
2970:
2815:
2796:
2731:
2696:
2524:
2278:
2259:
2255:
as the URL itself is typically shown in infoboxes and it is redundant to use the word website twice. I also used
1925:
700:
I have reverted this user's last 'edit without rationale'. I shall revert no more until the dispute is resolved.
498:
3931:
Already for the cause of the source selection. Citing a Christian site does not truly necessarily qualifies for
2995:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2017/mar/03/northern-ireland-assembly-election-latest-results
2896:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1941:
would like to think is simply not true, especially when you look at some of the parties that category includes!
4048:
3921:
3500:
3309:
3134:
2761:
2723:
2684:
2528:
1994:
1946:
1222:
The lede doesn't say that TUV has a seat: it just says DUP's (then) MEP left and formed TUV, which is correct.
543:
3339:
Someone needs to edit to remove the mural photograph. It's a fake - photoshopped. the original mural is here:
2592:), that tells us that the decision was made not to display the text from other fields in bold by default (eg,
578:
4544:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
3560:
3437:
3383:
3347:
3001:
1845:
4656:
An IP user just proposed removing the "centre-right" label again; I've approved the change. Last time, when
4559:
4439:
3904:
3629:
3408:
3319:
3293:
3268:
3191:
2966:
2931:
2823:
2656:
2369:
1499:
3160:
1389:
1286:
4109:
4018:
3886:
3708:
3664:
3078:
3070:
1818:
1773:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
1510:, but must be reverted as it is somehow at odds with BigDunc's "endemic" "homophobic bigotry" theory. --
384:
3469:? Though I suppose they're not official DUP events? (One can also be working class and far right, btw).
2310:
is actually OK and am willing to agree to it. Initially it looked like a blanking out of the party's URL.
1556:
MPs. Some of the others are MLAs. I might add in their actions as well to this section. Anyone object? --
4831:
4774:
4494:
Yes, we do - the salmon colour isn't actually present in the DUP logo whilst the navy blue colour is. --
3955:
3874:
3820:
3433:
3361:
3179:
2915:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2903:
2688:
2620:
2547:
2333:
2318:
2249:
2022:
1931:
1703:
1660:
1561:
1533:
1354:
1242:
1212:
394:
350:
2822:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1910:
349:
05:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)) They have 9/10 seats at westminster that were won by any unionist party.
2058:
The section 'Ideology and views' remains highly selective and unbalanced. To be NPOV and in line with
1699:
1309:
it's just repeated information from individual MLAs'/MPs' articles (though all give more detail there)
4713:
4581:
4118:
4067:
4037:
3828:
3429:
3285:
3031:
2870:
2849:
1986:
1837:
1652:
1339:
1278:
1184:
1138:
1106:
889:
802:
570:
494:
109:
3224:
93:
So there are still allegations of a republican spy ring operating in Stormont, and you cannot state
4839:
4808:
4786:
4767:
4735:
4717:
4700:
4651:
4637:
4616:
4612:
4597:
4567:
4529:
4503:
4489:
4474:
4447:
4413:
4397:
4381:
4365:
4349:
4323:
4288:
4262:
4242:
4215:
4200:
4184:
4155:
4144:
4122:
4094:
4090:
4084:
4071:
4056:
4040:
4026:
3970:
3944:
3917:
3908:
3878:
3870:
3850:
3832:
3782:
3759:
3749:
3732:
3676:
3633:
3618:
3608:
3594:
3585:
3552:
3489:
3475:
3456:
3412:
3398:
3387:
3365:
3351:
3331:
3313:
3297:
3272:
3242:
3234:
3199:
3183:
3164:
3146:
3127:
3107:
3082:
3053:
3038:
3005:
2945:
2800:
2774:
2754:
2735:
2710:
2700:
2412:
2385:
2300:
2282:
2204:
2194:
2180:
2176:
2156:
2152:
2141:
2117:
2113:
2083:
2079:
2071:
2053:
2049:
2038:
2034:
1998:
1965:
1961:
1950:
1934:
1913:
1892:
1888:
1810:
1791:
1707:
1693:
1664:
1637:
1605:
1580:
1565:
1550:
1537:
1516:
1476:
1453:
1435:
1418:
1406:
1377:
1358:
1343:
1328:
1290:
1260:
1256:
1246:
1231:
1227:
1216:
1193:
1173:
Unfortunately other editors don't share that idea. I created the category and after a rather quick
1164:
1147:
1124:
1074:
1039:
1005:
970:
933:
898:
864:
837:
811:
781:
763:
745:
709:
686:
654:
630:
602:
582:
554:
532:
512:
470:
456:
438:
428:
409:
397:
387:
367:
353:
326:
312:
291:
274:
221:
167:
152:
112:
101:
4668:. I've taken a look at the sourcing on the centre-right label, and I don't think it's sufficient.
4017:", is slightly more alarming than the fact that they aren't draping themselves in a rainbow flag.
2245:
I replaced the words "Official website" in the infobox, which linked to the party's website, with
546:
363:
would anyone object if I classified this article in the Category:Protestant political parties? --
4647:
4589:
4211:
3993:
3327:
3264:
3238:
3142:
3102:
3090:
2843:
2190:
1035:
929:
860:
759:
614:
528:
489:
called the British Ulster Alliance at a loyalist parade in the Whitewell area of North Belfastâ.
309:
3376:
3340:
2900:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2916:
158:
I'd say that shows that a need to expand the entire article to the same level of detail as the
81:
It said "the fact remains that a huge number of stolen documents were recovered by the police".
4731:
4485:
4393:
4361:
4284:
4140:
3882:
3778:
3745:
3704:
3672:
3604:
3537:
3233:
I would like to warn that people have found the trouble that this page has undergone amusing.
3074:
3066:
2137:
2021:
is still attached to these parts of the party's ideology and history. That must be resolved.
1920:
1732:
1691:
1601:
1474:
1433:
1404:
617:
appears to be edit warring and has cited the following as rationale for removing the category
550:
3356:
Who is Jakatbroughshane ? - seems very keen to remove sourced paragraph on links to UDA/UVF.
2434:
which you cited (and which I trust you read before citing), it explicitly says the following:
4819:
4804:
4782:
4761:
4694:
4525:
4409:
4377:
4345:
4319:
4258:
4238:
4196:
4180:
3951:
3804:
3357:
3175:
2411:
where if you make an edit (being bold) that gets reverted you should take to discussion for
2299:
where if you make an edit (being bold) that gets reverted you should take to discussion for
1656:
1632:
1575:
1557:
1545:
1529:
1511:
1507:
1448:
1440:
1413:
1372:
1350:
1323:
1238:
1208:
1160:
1120:
1070:
1001:
966:
833:
777:
741:
724:
has added the comment "I have explained why you are wrong, there is nothing more to say" at
705:
682:
650:
626:
598:
507:
2923:
4709:
4499:
4470:
4114:
4063:
4002:
3940:
3824:
3020:
2101:
2059:
2018:
1865:
1861:
1651:
And here's the Belfast Tele website for evidence of Edwin Poots' opinion on homosexuality
1648:
1644:
1571:
1444:
1335:
1179:
1133:
1101:
884:
797:
621:- Being a main political party doesn't give anyone an impunity from a wikipedia category.
467:
435:
422:"The only unionist party which has been consistently devolutionist throughout its history"
406:
346:
88:
4330:
Regarding your claims about the insignificance of Third Force to the DUP, I refer you to
2832:
https://web.archive.org/web/20091210232136/http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/documents/wp51.pdf
1385:
619:"no really, this not an appropriate category for Northern Ireland's main political party"
4815:
4424:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
3322:, so the IP had no easily visible indication that they were replying to an old comment.
961:
tried to start an argument on the Edit war notice board, which I avoided responding to.
4608:
3950:
They believe the Pope is the literal antichrist, how on earth are they "center-right?"
3123:
2882:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2644:
2357:
2172:
2162:
2148:
2109:
2075:
2067:
2045:
2030:
1957:
1884:
1753:
1620:
1252:
1223:
342:
323:
264:
From Google, it seems they are the same person, I'm trying to find a source that isn't
130:
4457:
On Knowledge, infoboxes and maps use the salmon colour () for the DUP, but from their
2922:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2227:, I'm bringing the matter to the talk page for discussion. The edits were as follows:
1528:
Are we at least all in agreement that the DUP & Homosexuality section can stay? --
4657:
4643:
4585:
4540:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
4207:
3323:
3138:
2431:
2408:
2296:
2186:
1760:
1679:
1503:
1031:
925:
856:
755:
721:
674:
666:
642:
611:
524:
463:
453:
425:
288:
271:
218:
164:
98:
4750:
4743:
4727:
4661:
4481:
4389:
4357:
4280:
4152:
4136:
3989:
3967:
3932:
3847:
3800:
3774:
3756:
3741:
3668:
3615:
3600:
3591:
3582:
3549:
3533:
3486:
3453:
3395:
2751:
2717:
2707:
2667:
2562:
2505:
2473:
2419:
2398:
2382:
2269:
2224:
2201:
2133:
1685:
1597:
1468:
1427:
1398:
669:
is continuing the edit war - his/her personal comments are offensive and unhelpful
266:
3220:
2632:
2345:
2185:
The Sudanese DUP gets about four times as many votes; looks like Abc has a point.
1628:
284:
159:
122:
Is the UK's Olympic team "Great Britain" or "Great Britain and Northern Ireland"?
2835:
4800:
4778:
4758:
4691:
4687:
4521:
4405:
4373:
4341:
4315:
4254:
4234:
4192:
4176:
4079:
3727:
3470:
3050:
2889:
2680:
2660:
2454:
As you can see, the BRD cycle was broken before I even had the chance to revert.
2404:
2373:
2292:
2232:
1156:
1116:
1066:
997:
962:
829:
773:
737:
701:
678:
646:
622:
594:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1767:
4495:
4466:
4462:
4332:
Unionist Politics and the Politics of Unionism since the Anglo-Irish Agreement
4009:. I don't know about you, but I think the fact that DUP Member of Parliament,
3936:
2888:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1807:
1721:
677:
has not bothered to talk about this and is clearly not editing in good faith.
364:
257:
149:
3421:
Highly contentious use of term 'far-right' to describe DUP's political stance
2782:
That is to say that, barring exceptional circumstances, local consensus need
2683:
unless there is an exceptional circumstance. Other stuff exists. (Again, see
1909:. Is this the case? and if so should the infobox be altered to reflect this?
1756:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
3119:
2648:
2361:
2265:
in the external links section so as to conform with the standard formatting.
1780:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
196:
144:
4621:
I also agree with this. If the DUP are centre-right to right-wing then the
1678:
I've made a start expanding the section, as before there was an element of
1425:
There is no consensus for the removal of content you just did Greatgavini.
1027:
you accused me of edit warring, we would all have not wasted the last hour.
1878:
A priest on the podium as Robinson prepares DUP troops for election battle
4508:
Not that any party should have a monopoly on blue, but we've already got
393:
that is rubbish. I'm from NI. There was never a single catholic in it.
233:
I don't object to much of the other text in itself. However, I feel that
4678:
The only other clearly-reliable source I can find with some googling is
3304:
I disagree. I didn't do it, but the edits seem fair and balanced to me.
3205:
The Internet knows this article, due to the vandalism that has occurred!
2066:
or none of them. Until some editor does that I've removed the section.--
4168:"No credible sources claim third force was a paramilitary organisation"
3466:
3219:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
2231:
Removing the post-nominal letters from the infobox in accordance with
1881:
I may be a devout Catholic but I will vote for DUP, says ex-SDLP mayor
567:
I would write this myself, but I don't consider myself a good writer.
1384:
These links prove it is more than just a couple of outspoken members
338:
4007:
loyalist paramilitaries (not just "Ulster Resistance" way back when)
3118:
An article about a political party that has no section on policies!
1907:
right wing on constitutional issues, and left wing on social issues
379:
I would like to see evidence that it has no Roman Catholic members.
3667:, which by contrast doesn't have such strong links to terrorism. --
2584:
already displays the text from some fields in bold by default (eg,
2171:
Were you really confused or did you have to search to find that? --
3059:
Edits relating to dinosaurs, religion, homosexuality and abortion.
2850:
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/article2428174.ece
2619:
Your edit in regards to post-nominal letters is inconsistent with
2332:
Your edit in regards to post-nominal letters is inconsistent with
1367:
in a separate Controversy section (surely DUP-related controversy
1312:
the Katrina thing has ostensibly nothing to do with homosexuality
4420:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
3881:". Did the DUP become more moderate without its old voter base?
3255:
What was intended in changing the lede text of the article from
2063:
234:
1655:. I think we can safely say that our sources are reputable. --
4708:
Those are reasonable arguments, so I've removed centre-right.
3208:
2954:
25:
3935:, not even to mention the particular circumstances in NIE. --
3377:
https://twitter.com/brianwhelanhack/status/873183918492725248
3341:
https://twitter.com/brianwhelanhack/status/873183918492725248
4097:
view due to the focus on this in the mainland British press.
3707:; a position that in England would be considered extremist.
2855:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
4465:
colour () is the primary colour. Should this be changed? --
3420:
1713:
File:PeterRobinsonCropped.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
4520:. Do we really need more blue parties in the same tables?
2826:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1870:
Plenty of Fermanagh Catholics are unionist, says DUP woman
1766:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
3263:? Doesn't the former seem to be clearer to any reader? --
2554:. The only other NI political party with abbreviation is
2546:
Your edit in regards to the bolding is inconsistent with
2325:. The only other NI political party with abbreviation is
2317:
Your edit in regards to the bolding is inconsistent with
1862:
Do more Northern Ireland Catholics now support the Union?
1394:
the DUP's near pathological obsession with all things gay
4458:
2791:
being no objection to the changes, I will restore them.
4816:
DUP leadership: Sir Jeffrey Donaldson is only candidate
4307:
4303:
4167:
2819:
2687:.) If one disagrees with the MOS, that is a matter for
2307:
2062:
it should either summarise equally all the policies at
1443:
supported the merge of this redundant information, and
280:
4296:
Unionism and Orangeism in Northern Ireland Since 1945
3371:
Page is locked and contains fake image; edit required
4799:. So, as usual, let's not be in any rush to update.
2760:
You seem to be having serious trouble understanding
1866:
DUP's Peter Robinson plans appeal to Catholic voters
1570:
It's a "hot topic" for many parties (especially the
2892:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2242:
I fixed my own typo in the previous edit. (Whoops!)
1759:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
4480:Dont we normally take colour from the party logo?
4337:Paisley: Religion and Politics in Northern Ireland
560:Mervyn Storey and opposition to teaching evolution
118:What is the correct name of the UK's Olympic team?
3977:Anti-homosexuality trumps racism and imperialism?
1856:What may have been true in 2004 is not true now.
139:Loyalist paramilitary links section = PoV pushing
4104:links/views on to paramilitary groups, with the
3869:I checked the DUP page today and it went from "
4554:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
4434:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
4003:denigration of the native populations' culture
2878:This message was posted before February 2018.
2836:http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/documents/wp51.pdf
2223:Having had a series of four edits reverted by
1830:there are no anti-Catholic rules in the Party.
4642:I'm going to change this if that's okay then.
4100:I do think there should be more on the DUP's
2767:
2651:. Then again in regards to other UK parties:
2617:
2544:
2498:
2467:
2437:
2400:
2364:. Then again in regards to other UK parties:
8:
2770:does not apply to articles within its scope.
2130:Democratic Unionist Party (Northern Ireland)
1731:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
1315:incidents are not in any chronological order
2951:Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2017
2574:Irish parties need be an exception. And as
728:- Please note that this user has explained
4579:
3427:
3283:
2814:I have just modified one external link on
1923:'s comments about anti-homophobic laws on
1775:image page (File:PeterRobinsonCropped.jpg)
568:
3705:attempted subversion by CIA change agents
3532:considered mainstream in a UK context. --
3452:I concur and as a working class party...
4429:Peter Robinson (cropped, March 2013).png
4250:"to do the job of exterminating the IRA"
4220:Indeed. There's many references such as
1490:(or, to a lesser extent, the Australian
341:,yet it is the 4th largest party in the
4312:Crimes of Loyalty: A History of the UDA
1874:DUP leader appeals for Catholic support
4683:
4665:
4036:because they have a woman as leader).
2108:Not if it's unsubstantiated rumours.--
287:article condemning SF's links to IRA.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2867:to let others know (documentation at
2598:Template talk:Infobox political party
2447:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1801:Category:Protestant political parties
448:"--David McKittrick and David McVea,
383:That's kind of a common sense thing.
359:Category:Protestant political parties
7:
4091:don't make the talkpage into a forum
3844:Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013
3799:I disagree with a lot of the points
2722:How do you reconcile that view with
1976:Does nobody else find this bizarre?
1486:op ed. As for the "whitewash", see
1460:If thats the consensus in a few days
208:This sentence is also extremely PoV:
4306:and adding an additional reference
1763:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
4814:yup, the BBC says the same thing:
3320:only added to this archive in 2024
2629:Social Democratic and Labour Party
2625:Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
2556:Social Democratic and Labour Party
2552:Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
2440:In the edit summary of your revert
2342:Social Democratic and Labour Party
2338:Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
2327:Social Democratic and Labour Party
2323:Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
279:In the interests of balance, I've
24:
3278:Serious editing has been going on
2818:. Please take a moment to review
2519:is an initialism that stands for
2166:Democratic Unionist Party (Sudan)
2128:Shouldn't this article be called
1858:Priest: Catholics support the DUP
924:a pathway to constructive debate.
736:for the removal of the category.
70:Existence of spy ring in Stormont
3864:
3212:
3011:
2958:
2600:(perhaps with consultation from
1720:
1488:Republican Party (United States)
1065:other people not communicating.
29:
3821:Knowledge is not a crystal ball
2637:Green Party in Northern Ireland
2350:Green Party in Northern Ireland
1727:An image used in this article,
1396:shows it's a party-wide thing.
4664:reverted it, with the summary
3318:The above unsigned notice was
2736:21:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
2711:12:16, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
2701:00:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
2672:22:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2567:22:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2510:22:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2478:22:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2424:22:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2386:22:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
2283:19:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
1848:) 14:25, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
420:The article claims the DUP is
388:20:12, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
283:a Mitchell Reiss quote to the
18:Talk:Democratic Unionist Party
1:
4448:04:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
4414:22:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
4398:20:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
4382:08:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
4366:02:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
4350:17:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
4324:17:30, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
4289:01:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
4263:16:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
4243:12:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
4216:11:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
4201:11:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
4185:09:35, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
2946:18:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
2064:http://www.mydup.com/policies
1792:00:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
1729:File:PeterRobinsonCropped.jpg
471:16:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
457:17:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
452:(Penguin, 2001), pp. 89-90.--
439:13:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
429:19:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
398:15:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
354:15:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
304:Improvement Of Ideology Terms
292:11:59, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
275:11:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
222:11:29, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
168:14:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
153:14:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
117:
102:13:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
4625:are centre to centre-right.
4530:22:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
4504:14:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
4490:16:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
4475:16:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
1951:05:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1935:11:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
1914:09:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
1708:05:45, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
1496:Conservative Party of Canada
450:Making Sense of The Troubles
416:"Consistently devolutionist"
410:13:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
134:22:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
3114:Lack of info about policies
3073:) 12:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
2985:to reactivate your request.
2973:has been answered. Set the
2801:22:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
2755:13:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
2653:Scottish Conservative Party
2366:Scottish Conservative Party
1261:14:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1247:14:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
1232:23:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
1217:22:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
113:03:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
4856:
4684:centre-right to right wing
4598:12:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
4568:09:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
4015:valuable return to reality
3891:19:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
3332:16:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
2909:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2811:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2641:Traditional Unionist Voice
2558:, which is in your favour.
2354:Traditional Unionist Voice
2329:, which is in your favour.
2205:16:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
2195:14:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
2157:23:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
2142:22:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
2054:22:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
2039:04:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
2025:18:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
1966:22:37, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
1893:12:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
1768:Commons Undeletion Request
1735:for the following reason:
583:18:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
555:10:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
533:16:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
313:04:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
4840:14:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
4809:13:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
4549:Arlene Foster DUP MLA.jpg
4156:21:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
4145:18:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
4123:20:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
4085:22:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
4072:20:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
4057:22:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
4041:22:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
4027:20:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3971:09:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
3960:22:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
3945:13:35, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
3926:12:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
3909:11:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3851:22:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
3833:20:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
3815:the party as such in the
3783:15:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
3760:11:39, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
3750:01:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
3733:21:25, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3717:20:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3677:17:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3634:10:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3619:22:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3609:14:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3595:10:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3586:10:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3569:19:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3553:10:44, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3542:17:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3509:15:35, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3490:11:00, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3476:15:18, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3457:14:50, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3446:13:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3413:11:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3399:12:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3388:03:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3366:09:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3352:03:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3273:14:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
3243:19:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3200:19:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
3039:04:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
3006:23:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
2971:Democratic Unionist Party
2816:Democratic Unionist Party
2525:Knowledge:Manual of Style
2118:14:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
1999:03:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
1821:12:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
1811:10:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
1694:13:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
1665:21:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1638:20:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1606:19:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1581:20:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1566:17:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1551:16:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1517:16:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
1464:whitewash the article now
1194:09:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
1165:22:54, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1148:08:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1125:01:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1096:split for ease of editing
1075:01:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1040:01:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
1006:00:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
971:01:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
934:01:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
899:00:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
865:00:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
838:00:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
812:00:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
782:00:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
764:00:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
746:00:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
710:00:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
687:00:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
655:00:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
641:I have reported the user
631:23:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
603:22:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
368:07:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
235:the "undue weight" policy
97:that MI5 were behind it.
4792:Donaldson not leader yet
4787:08:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4768:07:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
4736:21:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
4718:08:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
4701:08:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
4652:09:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
4638:13:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
4617:21:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
4340:do my research you see.
3984:main political platform.
3314:13:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3298:11:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
3184:12:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3165:11:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3147:10:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3135:UK General Election 2017
3128:02:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3108:16:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3083:12:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3054:12:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
3045:Mind the cached versions
2084:17:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1538:15:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1477:15:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1454:15:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1436:15:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1419:15:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1407:14:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1378:15:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1359:14:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1344:09:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
1329:21:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
1271:2010 UK General Election
513:21:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
3095:WP:Conflict of Interest
2807:External links modified
2657:Scottish National Party
2579:Infobox political party
2370:Scottish National Party
2181:09:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
1291:23:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
327:10:35, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
4630:Icantthinkofausernames
4459:website and literature
3865:DUP's political stance
3665:British National Party
2779:
2764:, which reads in part:
2675:
2570:
2513:
2481:
2451:
2427:
1784:CommonsNotificationBot
1737:Other speedy deletions
1647:and Jeffrey Donaldson
443:I have read it here: "
91:
2621:Ulster Unionist Party
2548:Ulster Unionist Party
2334:Ulster Unionist Party
2319:Ulster Unionist Party
1494:, maybe the Canadian
1297:DUP and homosexuality
73:
42:of past discussions.
4461:, it seems like the
4166:It has been claimed
3722:Oh, wow! I'm saving
3521:backed by terrorists
3467:prominent immigrants
2890:regular verification
2602:WikiProject Politics
2009:, per the advice on
1610:Some have cited the
125:see Cfd discussion:
4049:Apollo The Logician
3809:British Green Party
3501:Apollo The Logician
2880:After February 2018
2859:parameter below to
2775:Knowledge:Consensus
2306:I will accept that
1972:Controversy Section
4573:Political Position
4560:Community Tech bot
4453:Colour for the DUP
4440:Community Tech bot
3994:Saudi Royal Family
3813:recently described
3807:(co-leader of the
3561:Ride the Hurricane
3261:has the most seats
2934:InternetArchiveBot
2885:InternetArchiveBot
2663:all use post-noms.
2376:all use post-noms.
1901:Political position
1761:fair use rationale
1690:
1498:, or even our own
1473:
1432:
1403:
1392:and as one states
1202:European Elections
645:for edit warring.
544:DUP Full Manifesto
4600:
4584:comment added by
4172:Belfast Telegraph
4038:Black Kite (talk)
3448:
3432:comment added by
3300:
3288:comment added by
3231:
3230:
3192:DrassupTrollsbane
3037:
3036:
2989:
2988:
2910:
2762:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
2724:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
2685:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
2673:
2568:
2529:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
2511:
2479:
2425:
2011:Article structure
1989:comment added by
1921:Jeffrey Donaldson
1849:
1840:comment added by
1798:
1797:
1741:What should I do?
1733:Wikimedia Commons
1684:
1467:
1426:
1397:
1281:comment added by
1207:the situation. --
585:
573:comment added by
519:DUP spokespersons
385:Carolynparrishfan
67:
66:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4847:
4837:
4830:
4829:
4824:
4747:
4604:I support this.
4519:
4515:
4511:
4482:Vif12vf/Tiberius
4082:
3805:Jonathan Bartley
3730:
3473:
3216:
3215:
3209:
3028:
3027:
3025:
3015:
3014:
2980:
2976:
2962:
2961:
2955:
2944:
2935:
2908:
2907:
2886:
2874:
2847:
2777:
2721:
2671:
2670:
2595:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2577:
2566:
2565:
2509:
2508:
2477:
2476:
2449:
2423:
2422:
2264:
2260:official website
2258:
2254:
2248:
2001:
1932:Timrollpickering
1835:
1752:If the image is
1724:
1717:
1716:
1688:
1635:
1634:The Great Gavini
1578:
1577:The Great Gavini
1548:
1547:The Great Gavini
1514:
1513:The Great Gavini
1508:Ian Paisley, Jr.
1471:
1451:
1450:The Great Gavini
1430:
1416:
1415:The Great Gavini
1401:
1375:
1374:The Great Gavini
1326:
1325:The Great Gavini
1293:
1190:
1187:
1182:
1144:
1141:
1136:
1112:
1109:
1104:
895:
892:
887:
808:
805:
800:
510:
509:The Great Gavini
481:Political links?
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4855:
4854:
4850:
4849:
4848:
4846:
4845:
4844:
4832:
4827:
4826:
4820:
4794:
4741:
4660:made the edit,
4575:
4556:nomination page
4542:
4517:
4513:
4509:
4455:
4436:nomination page
4422:
4164:
4089:Please please,
4080:
3979:
3867:
3817:Huffington Post
3728:
3525:The Independent
3471:
3423:
3373:
3280:
3253:
3213:
3207:
3116:
3061:
3047:
3034:
3021:
3012:
2978:
2974:
2959:
2953:
2938:
2933:
2901:
2894:have permission
2884:
2868:
2841:
2824:this simple FaQ
2809:
2793:207.161.217.209
2772:
2728:207.161.217.209
2715:
2693:207.161.217.209
2665:
2593:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2575:
2560:
2521:Manual of Style
2503:
2471:
2444:
2417:
2275:207.161.217.209
2262:
2256:
2252:
2246:
2221:
2126:
2098:
1984:
1974:
1943:109.155.132.251
1903:
1803:
1715:
1686:
1633:
1576:
1546:
1512:
1469:
1449:
1428:
1414:
1399:
1373:
1324:
1299:
1276:
1273:
1204:
1188:
1185:
1180:
1142:
1139:
1134:
1110:
1107:
1102:
1093:
893:
890:
885:
806:
803:
798:
591:
562:
540:
521:
508:
495:Political Dweeb
483:
418:
377:
375:Roman Catholics
361:
335:
306:
141:
120:
110:Lapsed Pacifist
72:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4853:
4851:
4843:
4842:
4793:
4790:
4775:WP:AGE MATTERS
4771:
4770:
4754:
4723:
4722:
4721:
4720:
4603:
4574:
4571:
4552:
4551:
4541:
4538:
4537:
4536:
4535:
4534:
4533:
4532:
4454:
4451:
4432:
4431:
4421:
4418:
4417:
4416:
4385:
4384:
4353:
4352:
4327:
4326:
4300:
4294:The page from
4276:
4275:
4270:
4269:
4268:
4267:
4266:
4265:
4245:
4163:
4162:Paramilitaries
4160:
4159:
4158:
4128:
4127:
4126:
4125:
4110:ClaĂomh Solais
4098:
4076:
4075:
4074:
4044:
4043:
4019:ClaĂomh Solais
3978:
3975:
3974:
3973:
3948:
3947:
3918:VelvetCommuter
3914:
3913:
3912:
3911:
3866:
3863:
3862:
3861:
3860:
3859:
3858:
3857:
3856:
3855:
3854:
3853:
3839:
3790:
3789:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3765:
3764:
3763:
3762:
3736:
3735:
3709:ClaĂomh Solais
3692:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3687:
3686:
3685:
3684:
3683:
3682:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3647:
3646:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3578:
3556:
3555:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3492:
3482:
3460:
3459:
3422:
3419:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3415:
3372:
3369:
3337:
3336:
3335:
3334:
3306:193.63.174.254
3279:
3276:
3252:
3246:
3229:
3228:
3217:
3206:
3203:
3187:
3186:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3150:
3149:
3115:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3060:
3057:
3046:
3043:
3042:
3041:
3032:
2987:
2986:
2963:
2952:
2949:
2928:
2927:
2920:
2853:
2852:
2838:
2830:Added archive
2808:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2780:
2771:
2765:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2676:
2664:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2571:
2559:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2514:
2502:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2482:
2470:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2452:
2443:
2435:
2428:
2416:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2330:
2311:
2304:
2267:
2266:
2243:
2240:
2236:
2220:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2125:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2104:22 July, 2014
2097:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2014:
1991:131.111.184.88
1973:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1938:
1937:
1902:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1851:
1850:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1802:
1799:
1796:
1795:
1771:
1770:
1764:
1757:
1743:
1742:
1725:
1714:
1711:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1313:
1310:
1307:
1298:
1295:
1272:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1168:
1167:
1151:
1150:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1028:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
787:
786:
785:
784:
751:
750:
749:
748:
732:and has given
715:
714:
713:
712:
698:note to admin:
692:
691:
690:
689:
660:
659:
658:
657:
636:
635:
634:
633:
590:
587:
575:81.157.117.104
561:
558:
539:
538:Full Manifesto
536:
520:
517:
516:
515:
482:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
417:
414:
413:
412:
391:
390:
376:
373:
360:
357:
343:United Kingdom
334:
331:
321:
305:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
277:
252:
251:
250:
249:
242:
241:
240:
239:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
209:
203:
202:
201:
200:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
171:
170:
140:
137:
119:
116:
71:
68:
65:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4852:
4841:
4838:
4835:
4825:
4823:
4817:
4813:
4812:
4811:
4810:
4806:
4802:
4798:
4791:
4789:
4788:
4784:
4780:
4776:
4769:
4766:
4763:
4760:
4755:
4752:
4745:
4740:
4739:
4738:
4737:
4733:
4729:
4719:
4715:
4711:
4707:
4706:
4705:
4704:
4703:
4702:
4699:
4696:
4693:
4689:
4685:
4682:, which says
4681:
4676:
4673:
4669:
4667:
4663:
4659:
4654:
4653:
4649:
4645:
4640:
4639:
4635:
4631:
4626:
4624:
4623:Conservatives
4619:
4618:
4614:
4610:
4605:
4601:
4599:
4595:
4591:
4587:
4583:
4572:
4570:
4569:
4565:
4561:
4557:
4550:
4547:
4546:
4545:
4539:
4531:
4527:
4523:
4514:Conservatives
4507:
4506:
4505:
4501:
4497:
4493:
4492:
4491:
4487:
4483:
4479:
4478:
4477:
4476:
4472:
4468:
4464:
4460:
4452:
4450:
4449:
4445:
4441:
4437:
4430:
4427:
4426:
4425:
4419:
4415:
4411:
4407:
4402:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4395:
4391:
4383:
4379:
4375:
4370:
4369:
4368:
4367:
4363:
4359:
4351:
4347:
4343:
4338:
4333:
4329:
4328:
4325:
4321:
4317:
4313:
4309:
4305:
4301:
4297:
4293:
4292:
4291:
4290:
4286:
4282:
4272:
4271:
4264:
4260:
4256:
4251:
4246:
4244:
4240:
4236:
4231:
4227:
4223:
4219:
4218:
4217:
4213:
4209:
4204:
4203:
4202:
4198:
4194:
4189:
4188:
4187:
4186:
4182:
4178:
4173:
4169:
4161:
4157:
4154:
4149:
4148:
4147:
4146:
4142:
4138:
4134:
4124:
4120:
4116:
4111:
4107:
4103:
4099:
4096:
4092:
4088:
4087:
4086:
4083:
4077:
4073:
4069:
4065:
4060:
4059:
4058:
4054:
4050:
4046:
4045:
4042:
4039:
4034:
4031:
4030:
4029:
4028:
4024:
4020:
4016:
4012:
4008:
4005:and links to
4004:
3998:
3995:
3991:
3986:
3985:
3976:
3972:
3969:
3964:
3963:
3962:
3961:
3957:
3953:
3946:
3942:
3938:
3934:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3927:
3923:
3919:
3910:
3906:
3902:
3901:87.102.116.36
3897:
3896:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3892:
3888:
3884:
3880:
3876:
3872:
3852:
3849:
3845:
3840:
3836:
3835:
3834:
3830:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3814:
3810:
3806:
3802:
3798:
3797:
3796:
3795:
3794:
3793:
3792:
3791:
3784:
3780:
3776:
3771:
3770:
3769:
3768:
3767:
3766:
3761:
3758:
3753:
3752:
3751:
3747:
3743:
3738:
3737:
3734:
3731:
3725:
3721:
3720:
3719:
3718:
3714:
3710:
3706:
3702:
3698:
3678:
3674:
3670:
3666:
3661:
3660:
3659:
3658:
3657:
3656:
3655:
3654:
3653:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3649:
3648:
3635:
3631:
3627:
3626:87.102.116.36
3622:
3621:
3620:
3617:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3606:
3602:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3593:
3589:
3588:
3587:
3584:
3579:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3572:
3571:
3570:
3566:
3562:
3554:
3551:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3543:
3539:
3535:
3531:
3526:
3522:
3517:
3511:
3510:
3506:
3502:
3491:
3488:
3483:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3474:
3468:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3458:
3455:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3447:
3443:
3439:
3435:
3434:JamesPaterson
3431:
3414:
3410:
3406:
3405:87.102.116.36
3402:
3401:
3400:
3397:
3392:
3391:
3390:
3389:
3385:
3381:
3380:121.79.248.30
3378:
3370:
3368:
3367:
3363:
3359:
3354:
3353:
3349:
3345:
3344:121.79.248.30
3342:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3321:
3317:
3316:
3315:
3311:
3307:
3303:
3302:
3301:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3287:
3277:
3275:
3274:
3270:
3266:
3265:SergeWoodzing
3262:
3258:
3257:largest party
3250:
3247:
3245:
3244:
3240:
3236:
3226:
3225:MediaWiki.org
3222:
3218:
3211:
3210:
3204:
3202:
3201:
3197:
3193:
3185:
3181:
3177:
3172:
3171:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3148:
3144:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3125:
3121:
3113:
3109:
3106:
3105:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3072:
3068:
3064:
3058:
3056:
3055:
3052:
3044:
3040:
3035:
3030:
3026:
3024:
3018:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2998:86.139.211.69
2996:
2992:
2984:
2981:parameter to
2972:
2968:
2964:
2957:
2956:
2950:
2948:
2947:
2942:
2937:
2936:
2925:
2921:
2918:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2905:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2887:
2881:
2876:
2872:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2851:
2845:
2839:
2837:
2833:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2825:
2821:
2817:
2812:
2806:
2802:
2798:
2794:
2790:
2785:
2781:
2778:
2776:
2766:
2763:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2753:
2737:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2719:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2709:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2677:
2674:
2669:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2603:
2599:
2580:
2572:
2569:
2564:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2515:
2512:
2507:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2483:
2480:
2475:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2462:
2461:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2441:
2436:
2433:
2429:
2426:
2421:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2399:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2387:
2384:
2380:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2316:
2315:
2312:
2309:
2305:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2271:
2261:
2251:
2244:
2241:
2237:
2234:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2226:
2218:
2206:
2203:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2169:
2167:
2164:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2103:
2095:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2027:
2026:
2024:
2020:
2015:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1981:
1977:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1936:
1933:
1928:
1927:
1926:Question Time
1922:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1912:
1908:
1900:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1847:
1843:
1842:82.18.164.134
1839:
1832:
1828:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1800:
1794:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1776:
1769:
1765:
1762:
1758:
1755:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1747:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1723:
1719:
1718:
1712:
1710:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1696:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1681:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1636:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1621:not a soapbox
1618:
1617:opinion piece
1613:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1582:
1579:
1573:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1549:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1518:
1515:
1509:
1505:
1504:Iris Robinson
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1475:
1472:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1452:
1446:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1434:
1431:
1424:
1420:
1417:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1402:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1370:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1331:
1330:
1327:
1317:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1296:
1294:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1270:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1201:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1183:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1137:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:
1105:
1098:
1097:
1090:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1007:
1003:
999:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
972:
968:
964:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
935:
931:
927:
923:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
900:
897:
896:
888:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
866:
862:
858:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
839:
835:
831:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
813:
810:
809:
801:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
783:
779:
775:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
761:
757:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:User:Sumbuddi
719:
718:
717:
716:
711:
707:
703:
699:
696:
695:
694:
693:
688:
684:
680:
676:
675:User:Sumbuddi
672:
668:
667:User:Sumbuddi
664:
663:
662:
661:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:User:Sumbuddi
640:
639:
638:
637:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
613:
612:User:Sumbuddi
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
600:
596:
588:
586:
584:
580:
576:
572:
565:
559:
557:
556:
552:
548:
545:
537:
535:
534:
530:
526:
518:
514:
511:
504:
503:
502:
500:
496:
490:
486:
480:
472:
469:
465:
464:Bob McCartney
460:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
442:
441:
440:
437:
433:
432:
431:
430:
427:
423:
415:
411:
408:
403:
402:
401:
399:
396:
395:82.163.39.200
389:
386:
382:
381:
380:
374:
372:
369:
366:
358:
356:
355:
352:
351:82.163.39.200
348:
344:
340:
332:
330:
328:
325:
319:
315:
314:
311:
310:WilliamNorman
303:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
276:
273:
269:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
246:
245:
244:
243:
236:
232:
225:
223:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
210:
207:
206:
205:
204:
198:
193:
192:
191:
190:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
169:
166:
161:
157:
156:
155:
154:
151:
146:
138:
136:
135:
132:
128:
123:
115:
114:
111:
107:
104:
103:
100:
96:
90:
89:
87:
83:
82:
78:
77:
69:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4833:
4821:
4795:
4772:
4724:
4677:
4674:
4670:
4655:
4641:
4627:
4620:
4606:
4602:
4580:â Preceding
4576:
4553:
4543:
4518:Brexit Party
4456:
4433:
4423:
4386:
4354:
4336:
4331:
4311:
4310:to the book
4295:
4277:
4165:
4132:
4129:
4105:
4101:
4032:
4011:Sammy Wilson
3999:
3990:Saudi Arabia
3987:
3983:
3980:
3949:
3915:
3883:ColumbusOH!6
3875:Centre-right
3868:
3816:
3726:diff! ROFL!
3723:
3693:
3557:
3529:
3524:
3515:
3512:
3498:
3428:â Preceding
3424:
3374:
3355:
3338:
3290:81.99.95.141
3284:â Preceding
3281:
3260:
3256:
3254:
3248:
3232:
3188:
3117:
3103:
3101:. Regards â
3075:JoeyofScotia
3067:JoeyofScotia
3065:
3062:
3048:
3022:
3016:
2993:
2990:
2982:
2967:edit request
2932:
2929:
2904:source check
2883:
2877:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2854:
2813:
2810:
2788:
2783:
2768:
2748:
2668:User:Mabuska
2618:
2594:abbreviation
2563:User:Mabuska
2545:
2520:
2516:
2506:User:Mabuska
2501:consistency.
2499:
2474:User:Mabuska
2468:
2439:
2438:
2420:User:Mabuska
2413:WP:CONSENSUS
2401:
2301:WP:CONSENSUS
2268:
2250:official URL
2222:
2127:
2099:
2060:undue weight
2019:undue weight
1982:
1978:
1975:
1939:
1924:
1911:86.12.249.63
1906:
1904:
1804:
1779:
1778:
1772:
1745:
1744:
1736:
1697:
1677:
1624:
1616:
1527:
1483:
1463:
1459:
1393:
1368:
1347:
1332:
1321:
1300:
1274:
1205:
1178:
1132:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1091:Homophobia 2
921:
883:
796:
752:
734:no rationale
733:
729:
697:
670:
618:
592:
569:â Preceding
566:
563:
541:
522:
491:
487:
484:
449:
444:
421:
419:
405:the party.
392:
378:
362:
336:
320:
316:
307:
267:An Phoblacht
265:
142:
124:
121:
108:
105:
94:
92:
85:
84:
80:
79:
75:
74:
60:
43:
37:
4688:citogenesis
3952:Zellfire999
3701:Fianna FĂĄil
3358:Roy Bateman
3221:Phabricator
3176:Jimbo Wales
3157:79.78.176.9
3091:WP:BLPGROUP
2871:Sourcecheck
2681:MOS:POSTNOM
2661:Plaid Cymru
2645:Fianna FĂĄil
2590:native_name
2405:MOS:POSTNOM
2374:Plaid Cymru
2358:Fianna FĂĄil
2293:MOS:POSTNOM
2233:MOS:POSTNOM
1985:âPreceding
1836:âPreceding
1746:Don't panic
1700:Hachimanchu
1657:Ednabelfast
1558:Ednabelfast
1530:Ednabelfast
1441:Ednabelfast
1351:Ednabelfast
1283:92.2.168.76
1277:âPreceding
1251:Work away.
36:This is an
4710:Valenciano
4115:GringisMan
4064:GringisMan
3992:under the
3879:Right-wing
3871:Right-wing
3825:GringisMan
3514:perceived
3249:Most seats
3023:Rivertorch
2975:|answered=
2941:Report bug
2102:Teetotaler
1445:Quarkstorm
1336:Quarkstorm
1175:discussion
589:Homophobia
468:Quarkstorm
436:Quarkstorm
407:Quarkstorm
347:Aidan Work
4463:navy blue
4095:recentist
3697:Fine Gael
2924:this tool
2917:this tool
2844:dead link
2689:WT:MOSBIO
2649:Fine Gael
2633:Sinn FĂ©in
2362:Fine Gael
2346:Sinn FĂ©in
2308:this edit
2173:Flexdream
2163:Flexdream
2149:Flexdream
2110:Flexdream
2096:Expansion
2076:Flexdream
2068:Flexdream
2046:Flexdream
2031:Flexdream
1958:Flexdream
1885:Flexdream
1680:synthesis
1629:Sinn FĂ©in
1334:section.
1253:Mooretwin
1224:Mooretwin
720:The user
665:The user
610:The user
324:Derry Boi
285:Sinn FĂ©in
199:article??
197:Sinn Fein
160:Sinn FĂ©in
145:Sinn Fein
131:Mais oui!
61:Archive 1
4658:Dylan109
4644:Dylan109
4594:contribs
4586:Dylan109
4582:unsigned
4208:Red King
4108:article
4106:Guardian
4001:racism,
3499:I agree
3442:contribs
3430:unsigned
3324:Graham87
3286:unsigned
3235:Leo1pard
3139:ToniSant
2930:Cheers.â
2187:Gob Lofa
2044:think?--
1987:unsigned
1838:unsigned
1754:non-free
1492:Liberals
1484:Guardian
1279:unsigned
1032:Sumbuddi
926:Sumbuddi
857:Sumbuddi
756:Sumbuddi
571:unsigned
525:Gecko177
454:Johnbull
426:Johnbull
289:Demiurge
272:Demiurge
238:sources?
219:Demiurge
165:Demiurge
99:Demiurge
4836:acanese
4744:Cbowsie
4728:Cbowsie
4662:Cbowsie
4390:Cbowsie
4358:Cbowsie
4281:Cbowsie
4153:Mabuska
4137:Tataral
4102:current
3968:Mabuska
3848:Mabuska
3801:Tataral
3775:Tataral
3757:Mabuska
3742:Tataral
3669:Tataral
3616:Mabuska
3601:Tataral
3592:Mabuska
3583:Mabuska
3550:Mabuska
3534:Tataral
3516:locally
3487:Mabuska
3454:Mabuska
3396:Mabuska
3223:and on
2857:checked
2848:tag to
2820:my edit
2752:Mabuska
2718:Mabuska
2708:Mabuska
2485:myself.
2383:Mabuska
2270:Mabuska
2225:Mabuska
2202:Mabuska
2134:Abcmaxx
2029:them?--
1687:BigDunc
1598:Domer48
1470:BigDunc
1429:BigDunc
1400:BigDunc
730:nothing
547:Jdfjurn
95:as fact
39:archive
4801:FDW777
4779:FDW777
4759:Gaelan
4692:Gaelan
4522:FDW777
4406:FDW777
4374:FDW777
4342:FDW777
4316:FDW777
4274:aware.
4255:FDW777
4235:FDW777
4193:FDW777
4177:FDW777
4081:Bastun
3873:" to "
3729:Bastun
3472:Bastun
3104:Marcus
3051:Fennec
2865:failed
2840:Added
2639:, and
2432:WP:BRD
2409:WP:BRD
2352:, and
2297:WP:BRD
2219:Revert
2023:Bastin
1919:Given
1819:Bastin
1612:G.O.P.
1572:G.O.P.
1500:Tories
1462:, not
1189:amster
1157:Vexorg
1143:amster
1117:Vexorg
1111:amster
1067:Vexorg
998:Vexorg
963:Vexorg
894:amster
830:Vexorg
807:amster
774:Vexorg
738:Vexorg
702:Vexorg
679:Vexorg
647:Vexorg
623:Vexorg
595:Vexorg
339:Ulster
4496:RaviC
4467:RaviC
3937:Joobo
3933:WP:RS
3523:" as
3033:WATER
2979:|ans=
2965:This
2789:still
2239:case?
2124:title
1808:C mon
1306:etc.)
365:C mon
345:. - (
281:added
258:Jonto
150:Jonto
16:<
4818:. â
4805:talk
4783:talk
4773:Per
4732:talk
4714:talk
4680:CNBC
4648:talk
4634:talk
4613:talk
4590:talk
4564:talk
4526:talk
4516:and
4500:talk
4486:talk
4471:talk
4444:talk
4410:talk
4394:talk
4378:talk
4362:talk
4346:talk
4320:talk
4308:here
4304:here
4285:talk
4259:talk
4239:talk
4230:this
4228:and
4226:this
4222:this
4212:talk
4197:talk
4181:talk
4141:talk
4119:talk
4068:talk
4053:talk
4023:talk
3956:talk
3941:talk
3922:talk
3905:talk
3887:talk
3829:talk
3779:talk
3746:talk
3724:that
3713:talk
3699:and
3673:talk
3630:talk
3605:talk
3577:DUP.
3565:talk
3538:talk
3505:talk
3438:talk
3409:talk
3384:talk
3362:talk
3348:talk
3328:talk
3310:talk
3294:talk
3269:talk
3239:talk
3196:talk
3180:talk
3161:talk
3143:talk
3137:. --
3124:talk
3120:Nurg
3079:talk
3071:talk
3017:Done
3002:talk
2861:true
2797:talk
2732:talk
2697:talk
2659:and
2647:and
2586:name
2550:and
2372:and
2360:and
2321:and
2279:talk
2191:talk
2177:talk
2153:talk
2138:talk
2114:talk
2080:talk
2072:talk
2050:talk
2035:talk
2007:NPOV
1995:talk
1962:talk
1947:talk
1889:talk
1883:. --
1846:talk
1788:talk
1704:talk
1661:talk
1653:here
1649:here
1645:here
1602:talk
1562:talk
1534:talk
1506:and
1390:here
1388:and
1386:here
1369:must
1355:talk
1340:talk
1287:talk
1257:talk
1243:talk
1239:Neil
1228:talk
1213:talk
1209:Neil
1161:talk
1121:talk
1071:talk
1036:talk
1002:talk
967:talk
930:talk
861:talk
834:talk
778:talk
760:talk
742:talk
706:talk
683:talk
651:talk
627:talk
615:talk
599:talk
579:talk
551:talk
529:talk
499:talk
248:two.
4609:Jay
4558:. â
4510:UUP
4438:. â
3877:to
3530:not
3259:to
2977:or
2969:to
2898:RfC
2875:).
2863:or
2834:to
2784:not
2679:in
2517:MOS
1322:--
1181:Web
1135:Web
1103:Web
922:not
886:Web
799:Web
4807:)
4785:)
4765:âïž
4762:đŹ
4751:OR
4734:)
4716:)
4698:âïž
4695:đŹ
4690:.
4650:)
4636:)
4628:--
4615:)
4607:--
4596:)
4592:âą
4566:)
4528:)
4512:,
4502:)
4488:)
4473:)
4446:)
4412:)
4396:)
4380:)
4364:)
4348:)
4322:)
4287:)
4261:)
4241:)
4224:,
4214:)
4206:--
4199:)
4183:)
4143:)
4133:UK
4121:)
4070:)
4055:)
4025:)
3958:)
3943:)
3924:)
3907:)
3889:)
3831:)
3811:)
3781:)
3748:)
3715:)
3675:)
3632:)
3607:)
3567:)
3540:)
3507:)
3444:)
3440:âą
3411:)
3386:)
3364:)
3350:)
3330:)
3312:)
3296:)
3271:)
3241:)
3198:)
3182:)
3163:)
3145:)
3126:)
3081:)
3019:.
3004:)
2983:no
2911:.
2906:}}
2902:{{
2873:}}
2869:{{
2846:}}
2842:{{
2799:)
2773:â
2734:)
2726:?
2699:)
2691:.
2666:â
2655:,
2635:,
2631:,
2627:,
2623:,
2604:).
2588:,
2582:}}
2576:{{
2561:â
2504:â
2472:â
2445:â
2418:â
2368:,
2348:,
2344:,
2340:,
2336:,
2281:)
2263:}}
2257:{{
2253:}}
2247:{{
2193:)
2179:)
2168:?
2155:)
2140:)
2132:?
2116:)
2082:)
2052:)
2037:)
1997:)
1964:)
1949:)
1891:)
1876:.
1872:.
1868:.
1864:.
1860:,
1790:)
1782:--
1706:)
1663:)
1604:)
1564:)
1536:)
1466:.
1357:)
1342:)
1289:)
1259:)
1245:)
1237:--
1230:)
1215:)
1163:)
1123:)
1073:)
1038:)
1004:)
969:)
932:)
882:--
863:)
836:)
795:--
780:)
762:)
744:)
708:)
685:)
653:)
629:)
601:)
581:)
553:)
531:)
501:)
466:.
333:!!
329:)
308:--
129:--
4834:M
4828:n
4822:A
4803:(
4781:(
4753:.
4746::
4742:@
4730:(
4712:(
4646:(
4632:(
4611:(
4588:(
4562:(
4524:(
4498:(
4484:(
4469:(
4442:(
4408:(
4392:(
4376:(
4360:(
4344:(
4318:(
4283:(
4257:(
4237:(
4210:(
4195:(
4179:(
4139:(
4117:(
4066:(
4051:(
4021:(
3954:(
3939:(
3920:(
3903:(
3885:(
3827:(
3777:(
3744:(
3711:(
3671:(
3628:(
3603:(
3563:(
3536:(
3519:"
3503:(
3436:(
3407:(
3382:(
3360:(
3346:(
3326:(
3308:(
3292:(
3267:(
3251:?
3237:(
3227:.
3194:(
3178:(
3159:(
3141:(
3122:(
3077:(
3069:(
3000:(
2943:)
2939:(
2926:.
2919:.
2795:(
2730:(
2720::
2716:@
2695:(
2277:(
2189:(
2175:(
2161:@
2151:(
2136:(
2112:(
2078:(
2070:(
2048:(
2033:(
2013:.
1993:(
1960:(
1945:(
1887:(
1844:(
1786:(
1702:(
1659:(
1600:(
1560:(
1532:(
1353:(
1338:(
1285:(
1255:(
1241:(
1226:(
1211:(
1186:H
1159:(
1140:H
1119:(
1108:H
1069:(
1034:(
1000:(
965:(
928:(
891:H
859:(
832:(
804:H
776:(
758:(
740:(
704:(
681:(
649:(
625:(
597:(
577:(
549:(
527:(
497:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.