3017:
context) phrases. There's no single ACTION by
Bolsonaro that jeopardized Brazilian Democracy. Actually, the "anti-democratic rallies" cited in this article was a protest against the Supreme Court which arrested a congressman, censored a site, and sent police to confiscate the computer and phone of an Brazilian comedian who is a critic of them (That's right, you read it exactly right). This article is so biased, that even the media in Brazil, which is hostile to him, don't make such an accusation. It's just absurd, comical. There is no single act in that sense, and it was agreed here, but the tactic was to take statements out of context. By adding Brazil here, the effect is just the spread of fake news. Brazil is as democratic as before. Actually, Bolsonaro often remembers that the people have the right to self-defense and supports freedom for anyone older than 25 years old and without criminal records to own guns. If the state wants to dominate a people, the first act would be disarming them. This article seems either from far-left sources or from misinformed sources. I suggest diverse sources, not a source based on extremist views, which is the case here.
3033:
false. No president has that power because various
American institutions prevent one person from seizing power. But you have to understand that for the American Left Trump's election in 2016 was viewed as synonymous with the events in 1933 Germany. Even recently, prior to America's mid-term elections in 2022, the left-wing politicians, and much of the media, told the people that if the right-wing party (Republicans) won the election then democracy would be over in America. Unfortunately, my fellow Americans have succumbed to political rhetoric and now view hyperbolic statements and fear mongering as true. I haven't commented on a talk page in probably 15 years even though I read them all the time. This page is one of the worst pages I have seen. The bias is so slanted that the page is now a work of fiction. It is a polemic against conservative governments around the world.
2372:
section, due to the high relevance of the issue for the readers. At the moment, the article covers exclusively cases of Poland and
Hungary in a redundant manner. The contemporary scholarly discussion indicates those cases shall be treated separately, as the democratic trends in the region at large might be different. Therefore, my intent is to provide a theoretical background needed to comprehend de-democratization discussion in the region, followed by separated sections regarding Poland and Hungary and the rest of the countries in the region (excluding post-soviet republics for semantic reasons). In this way, the page would accurately represent the state-of-art research on the subject, whilst providing extensive coverage of cases that might be of uttermost importance for the readers (given the recent state of emergency power employed indefinitely by Orban).
2437:
democratic backsliding occurs. Additionally, the part on prevalence is not sufficiently substantiated to embody a reliable source and could be further expanded by adding more in-depth information and empirics in a cross-sectional/historical context. In my contribution, I would prominently focus on the elements of executive aggrandizement, personalism and the prevalence section on
Venezuela by utilizing T. Khaitan’s article on executive aggrandizement and personalism (Khaitan 2018), substantiated by Posner, Issacharoff (2018), Diamond et al (2014) and Geddes et al (2014) and, respectively, the democratic decay during the Chávez regime as empirical evidence, as described in J. Corrales’ articles (1999; 2007; 2011;2015).
1822:(2018): "We explore what can be learned from authoritarian backsliding in middle income countries about the threats to American democracy posed by the election of Donald Trump. We develop some causal hunches and an empirical baseline by considering the rise of elected autocrats in Venezuela, Turkey, and Hungary. Although American political institutions may forestall a reversion to electoral autocracy, we see some striking parallels in terms of democratic dysfunction, polarization, the nature of autocratic appeals, and the processes through which autocratic incumbents sought to exploit elected office."
2501:
simultaneously in the literature, but the issue of judiciary belongs to the debate over dismantinling of liberal(!) democratic institutions. Simply following Bermeo's line over backsliding might falsely suggest there is unanimity in the field over the conceptualization. Adding some information over illiberal turn would also prove to be immensely helpful background for the CEE section, as this concept encompasses Mair's idea of "hollowing out of democracy", which has to be explored in case of CEE given its notoriously immobilized civil society.
3167:"Democratic erosion" is already given as a synonym in the footnote at the start of the lede. The terms in this set all have the scent of academic jargon, which is not a sin in itself but does impede readability. I'm more concerned about an assumption in the current page title/name that democracy already exists before "backsliding" occurs. In public discourse, a large number of countries are labeled "nascent democracies" due to their inevitable birth pangs, moving forward and backward, sometimes several times a year.
3050:. An expert would certainly be capable of providing good sources backing such claims instead of limiting himself to name-calling and conspiracy theories. These claims that negative evaluation of Bolsonaro's presidency (and his well-documented anti-democratic beliefs and actions) is a "far-left" position (or a "left-wing American" position) seem particularly indicative of trolling - the same kind of trolling that, ironically, is directly correlated with democratic backsliding.
3530:
310:
119:
292:
98:
391:
370:
401:
129:
3141:"Recentism is a phenomenon on Knowledge (XXG) where an article has an inflated or imbalanced focus on recent events." Anyway the map doesn't show a current state but rather a fairly arbitrary time interval. The results are going to vary dramatically based on the exact years selected so I don't think the map does a good job informing readers of democratic backsliding either in the present (2022) or through history. (
21:
952:
after your edits and improvements the whole thing looks more neutral, thank you for that. Yes, the government rejects some weird criticism, but not just them, the people or other media as well. Especially nowadays the two sides on daily basis are making accusations not just on local, but global level and try to gain political advantages of them, we have to be careful, accurate and the most neutral as possible.(
224:
203:
533:
500:
1867:, April, 2017 'America is far from alone; populist authoritarian parties have gained strength at the polls in many Western societies. This includes the profound shock of Brexit in the UK, as well as record support reported in contemporary opinion polls for Geert Wilders for PVV in the Netherlands, Marine Le Pen’s National Front in France, and Giuseppe Grille’s Five StarsMovement in Italy.'
713:
the different regions (such as
Eastern Europe or Latin America) where we see democratic backsliding occurring. Finally, the article could be improved by using a wider variety of sources, since there is a lot of existing academic literature on the subject that hasn’t been referred to yet in the existing article (for example Nancy Bermeo’s article called ‘On Democratic Backsliding’). --
67:
2473:
democratic backsliding). You also have not explained the "NPOV issues": my edits fully comply with the policy on NPOV. The opinions of judges are relevant and my version reflects the fact that they are opinions. If you object, you are free to add a paragraph explaining or justifying the
Hungarian regime's record on human rights. I encourage you to visit the page on
475:
2989:
2701:
1812:(2019): "With Donald Trump’s presidential victory, the doubtful respect that populist leaders in Poland, Hungary, and Turkey have for democratic institutions, and the growing support for populist parties across Europe, the question of whether to be anxious on behalf of liberal democracy is much discussed in political theory and beyond."
3542:
how it is related to the topic, so it certainly does not belong in the first paragraph. Furthermore, I do not think that one could give just one estimate and put it in wikivoice, since there are multiple RS that estimate the number of democracies in the world and they do not all arrive at the same number of democratic countries.
1104:
We don't get to cherry pick academic journals, that's not how it works. You keep saying its fringe nonsense without substantiating the claim, the fact that three academic journals are sourced suggests the opposite. Now please substantiate that claim or stop making it/withdraw it. Third times the charm perhaps?
902:, sorry I did not notice the discussion. However I uphold what I said, yes, the sources do not contain this, because they are coming from the traditional opposion voices against the right-conservative parties. Thus, in order to repair neutrality then, further sources will be added to balance this somehow.(
3032:
This entire article is a polemic. It is from the perspective of left-wing
Americans. In America Bolsonaro is viewed as the 'Brazilian Trump' by members of the Left. The same is true of the governments of Hungary and Poland. Of course the claim that Trump moved America towards authoritarianism is also
2529:
Redundantly and overly detailed you added information of the judges and the judiciary system, and what you already added is enough informative in the issue, see the sentences about Handó and the EU, we don't need 7-8 sentences instead of 4. I explained the NPOV issus (excuse me, I know very well this
1103:
The first source you list talks about how the enlargement of participatory democracy in
Venezuela, please actually read the article. Regarding the second source you have listed, whether or not you believe it to be a Marxist journal does not change the fact that it is a peer-reviewed academic journal.
951:
Yes, however next to it Bozóki is openly supporting the opposition. As well, NYT is the traditional criticist not just regarding
Hungary yet, but any location where right-wing is on power (including Trump, etc.), sometimes with so weird epithets and designations that is far from the reality. However,
672:
We have fifty years of right wing thinkers; fifty years of right wing white papers, books, and lectures; fifty years of right wing politicians; fifty years of right wing think tanks and organizations and PACs; fifty years of right wing writers, journalists, academics, and philosophers; all saying the
3568:
I have absolutely no objection to the information going into the second paragraph instead of the lede graf, and I think it would be great for you to do the research to come up with the estimates of other RS's of the number of democracies in the world and adding those as well. However, the fact that
2455:
as I explained, the information you put is redundant and overly detailed, on the other hand if we discuss about NPOV issues, the legislature is not controlled by any party, on the other hand we have to mention also the outcome of the case of the judges. All the informations you put so far are enough
2436:
Many elements of this article could extensively be expanded and further elaborated on, entailing the main causers of democratic backsliding, such as personalism – which only consists of two sentences, and solely mentions Latin
America as empirical evidence of this phenomenon – and the forms in which
2371:
Given that democratic backsliding is a global phenomenon, it would be helpful for the article to contain a well-developed theoretical introductory part supplemented by the scholarly discussions regarding the specificities of particular regions. My intention is to develop the Central Eastern European
692:
The article mentions a few nations. Should it have a section covering by regions such as Central and Eastern Europe and Africa ? The Washington Post article (4 July 2018) said that one-third of the world’s population lives in a declining democracy, and books cover by region, so I would think some
3074:
image that was used was of better quality than the graph that occupies the space now. Though it is true that the graph shows it across all time frames, and is therefore a more complete assessment, the one we originally used that would be of the most use to a person who reads the article, especially
1911:
I'm not sure what your point is. "Democratic backsliding" is not the same as "competitive authoritarianism" or "outright authoritarian rule." Nor is a journal article from two decades ago saying that the U.S. is a democracy. Democratic backsliding obviously occurs in democracies; that's kind of the
941:
Bozóki is a political scientist and the NYT is a highly regarded newspaper. I removed some cites you added that did not address democratic backsliding, and conformed the text to the remaining sources, to make clear that the Hungarian government rejects the criticism of Freedom House and others. I'm
3541:
If this stat belongs anywhere in the lead, it should go in the second paragraph which already has other information about historical cases of democratic backsliding. I cannot imagine that any reliable source would give this stat in a 1-2 sentence summary of the topic, without context or explaining
3170:
Rather than pose in the mantle (or aura) of objectivity with supposed measurements based on a limited set of axioms, we would do better to list additional manifestations and/or edit some of the existing ones (e.g., in some countries "free" elections are not "degraded" from an earlier ideal because
3123:
says. It mostly refers to breaking news influencing Knowledge (XXG), not a desire to show the current state of things, especially in the lead photograph. The graph that is used does not demonstrate anything that isn't already explained in the lead section. The map conveys far more information that
2649:, the sentence in the source is clear: "the United States of America is the only country in Western Europe and North America suffering from substantial autocratization." That's unambiguous: of all the countries in either region, the U.S. was the only one suffering from substantial autocratization.
2472:
You did not explain, you merely stated that the information is redundant (which it is not, it is new information not stated elsewhere in the article) and overly detailed (which it also is not, since it describes how the judiciary is being politicized, which is relevant information in an article on
712:
To improve this article, I’ll be expanding the introductory section of the article by adding a more comprehensive definition of democratic backsliding, including the different types of democratic backsliding that have been observed recently or in the past. Also, I’d like to add several sections on
3240:
The word "common" is misleading IMO, because elite researchers using "democratic" as an adjective to compress their jargon ignores "common" syntax: the backsliding is not democratic, but rather "of a democracy". Considering the multitude of terms and the goal of usability by non-experts, we might
2629:
USA is a country only in North America, Western Europe is in a different continent!! If the article or you mean an aggregation like, if we regard Western Europe and the North America, only the USA is affected by something, even that should not be phrased like this, since it is still as bad as the
777:
threatens international order: report". I bolded the words you missed. Hungary and Poland are listed there on the exact same line as the countries I added. I agree Hungary or Turkey are more egregious examples, attested to in other sources and each having a section of its own in the article. So I
1712:
I have reverted to the last stable/good version. Your edit lacks consensus and I don't view it as an improvement. For one thing, it misleadingly lumps in places like Denmark and places like Venezuela (something not supported by any source); for another, it also dramatically overemphasizes Europe
2733:
The Issue of Democratic Backsliding in the United States is due to much more chronic issues that go back centuries. Blaming such a complex issue all on Trump stinks of recency bias. That section needs a much more nuanced take than just "Trump bad". I added a small bit of nuance, and a long-term
2500:
I fully agree the discussion over politicization of judiciary is well-worth including. In doing that I feel like it might be helpful though to include (or at least indicate the existence) of the academic contention regarding the contexts of illiberalism and backsliding. Indeed, they often occur
2412:
As I have been assigned to review your plans for this CP wikipedia assignment, I will hereby share my feedback. You mention this section being of great importance. On the one hand, providing evidence for why this is important would be beneficial, but on the other hand, be aware of violating the
1921:
My point is that no one thinks the state of democracy in US is like Hungary, anymore than they think France's backsliding is like Hungary's. Rather, they see some elements - in both France and the US - that stray from an ideal democracy. And my further point is that the source you selected some
3016:
The article shows an aggressive, exaggerated bias. As a Brazilian and expert on this topic, I can guarantee that even people from the left here would laugh at that. There's NO single act by the government of Brazil that would be considered Democratic backsliding. The article only cited (out of
751:
There's a difference between democracy scores going down, and states suffering severe democratic backsliding. By conflating Hungary and Poland with states like Denmark, the text gives the false impression that they all face similar democratic backsliding. The Freedom House source emphases both
2078:
Over the past decade, a scholarly consensus has emerged that that democracy in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) is deteriorating, a trend often subsumed under the label 'backsliding'. ... the new dynamics of backsliding are best illustrated by the one-time democratic front-runners Hungary and
3308:
I confess that I have never used Google Scholar, but I wonder if that is the best way to source "common" usage. My understanding is that the hits it generates are mainly *primary* sources. Do they also include public discourse such as newspapers or online media? I'm thinking usability here,
872:, in summarizing the report, would focus mostly on Europe, but there's no reason for us to do the same. I also strongly share Snooganssnoogans's concern about inaccurately implying that countries like Denmark have suffered the same degree of democratic backsliding as countries like Hungary.
850:
The secondary source currently used in the article, which reports in the Freedom House report says this: ""The U.S.-based research organization found backward moves on democracy in the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Hungary, Poland, Serbia and Spain, as well as the United States."
3458:
The article is about democratic backsliding throughout history. Adding info about the state of democracy in one particular year, to the second sentence of the article, is clearly giving undue weight to a present state (related, but not synonymous to the topic) thus recentism. Also,
3272:
usually means that the article title is the most common name used in reliable sources, but if you disagree feel free to start a requested moves discussion. (if it were up to me to decide I would pick "autocratization" since the subject of the article is becoming more autocratic).
1152:
Once again I ask you to substantiate the claim that it is the broad academic assessment. This is the third time you have refused to do so which suggests that you cannot. Even if this claim is correct that does not mean alternate academic opinions should not be included, after all
3071:
2417:, as one person may deem this importance of deviant significance than others. Additionally, do you plan on taking a historical approach to this section? Covering a cross-sectional analysis on the topic, entailing both during-soviet, as well as pre- and post-soviet scenarios?
3575:
a valid reason for excluding it. Knowledge (XXG) requires reliable sources, and if the current estimate is from a reliable source -- which it seems to be -- it can be included in the article, whether or not other estimates from other sources are also included: after all
3365:
I think it's a bad idea to change the title. Democratic backsliding is by far the most commonly used term to describe this phenomenon. Other terms should be mentioned and given a redirect, but there is no reason to change the title to a more complex term, like
3490:
to the subject. To know how democracy in the world (writ large) is healthy or not, one must know the state of democracy in the world at each moment. Backsliding is not only an issue in each individual democracy, it is an issue in the world at large.
1749:
That's not an answer to my question. Does any source support misleadingly lumping in places like the US with Venezuela? The sentence in Politico puts France and the UK in the same position as the US: "The report identified rising anxiety because of:
3265:
3680:) for partially decreased visibility (only "partially", seeing the overlap in the subjects of democratic backsliding and its application in the U.S. (on the English Wiki) and hence anticipated likelihood of a given editor watching both pages).
3255:
When writing the footnote, I did some pretty exhaustive searches and determined that "democratic backsliding" is the most common name although I agree it may not be the most intuitive; others listed are less common. "Erosion of democracy" gets
1171:
Besides the sources which are already cited in the Knowledge (XXG) article, there are plenty more that refer to DB in Venezuela, all peer-reviewed and from top political science journals and university book presses. It's a blatant violation of
2530:
policy, COI is not the case here, if not from your side), see the edits logs and also here what I have written. No problem about sources, will add. Sorry, edit warring is not the case right know, and we cannot ignore the problems I mentioned.(
545:
512:
1119:
There are are far-right Race/IQ style journals that publish 'peer-reviewed' articles. That does not make them reliable sources. It certainly does not put the claims published in such a journal on the same level as broad academic assessments.
1567:
3232:
That's an excellent point but the fact that a small "galaxy" of synonyms is being offered suggests that consensus is in flux. As I noted, these "common" terms all sound like academic jargon, which ironically (?) harks back to WP cofounder
2775:
Some amount of "democratic backsliding" may have been going on for a while (if hardly "centuries", not while voting right were being constantly extended, and the Senate became elected and not appointed, etc.), but the onset of Trump was a
2857:" is significantly similar to this article. It seems redundant to have both. The articles should be merged with each other, with Democratic recession's useful information being transferred to this article, and then making it a redirect.
2481:. Also, your addition about the judges' case was not cited or discussed in the existing citations. It should be removed until you can provide a reliable source stating that the judges were paid compensation. Please see the policy on
1213:. There is no Knowledge (XXG) policy which states notable opinions cannot be present in an article, even if they disagree with the so-called "broad assessment". The multiple academic sources I have provided establish its notability.
1815:
3446:
No, it is very much about the state of democracy in the world, and describes how democracues are "backslidingh" into non- or quasi-democratic form due to changes in their processed. The material added is therefore relevant.
1858:(2000) 'At other times, however, we judge actual systems to be democratic, even though they fall short, probably far short, of the ideal, as when we say that the United states, France and Sweden, for example are democracies'
3326:
Not all reliable sources are on Google Scholar but it's one way to get easily reproducible counts for the frequency of different terms in a subset of reliable sources. Article titles are based on both policy and consensus.
732:
The source used as a reference says clearly "The U.S.-based research organization found backward moves on democracy in the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Hungary, Poland, Serbia and Spain, as well as the United States."
2672:
Well, the recent version is probably the best, now logically satisfies interpretations, however I still stand it's not the best possible. Of course, Neutrality tried to do the best, I never thought it would be on him
1137:, which you added to support your fringe text, is a review essay of mostly non-academic books, and the review literally says that most of the book reviewed "sound an alarm" about the state of Venezuelan democracy.
1974:, in reports in 2017 and 2019, identified democratic backsliding a variety of regions across the world. Scholarly work in the 2010s detailed democratic backsliding, in various forms and to various extents, in
822:
How is it not due weight, when the source used for the other countries lists these on the same line? The source itself focuses on Europe, it is precisely due weight to have our article show the same focus.
654:
I've removed the POV tag that was added — I don't see any issue with the article as it stands from a POV perspective. If you have a specific issue, you can raise it here on the talk page for consideration.
3546:
only 30% of the world's population lives in a democracy. Such complexities are difficult to handle briefly, which inclines me to think that this stat belongs in other articles not necessarily this one.
3294:
Yes, autocratization is probably better. It is polysyllabic but at least it follows "common" syntax. And it provides a kind of "target" concept that refers to the presumed result of backsliding.
3203:
I agree that democratic backsliding could be described as "eroding the freedom and/or meaningfulness of elections in any given country", but that does not mean that the proposed title satisfies
1740:
The sentence is giving examples from different continents/areas of the world, as a look at the sentence makes clear: "identified democratic backsliding a variety of regions across the world..."
3034:
3351:
IMO, it would be more logical to submit two (or maybe more) terms from the synonym list as candidates for new title, specifically Autocratization and Erosion of Democracy. What do you think?
1201:, anybody can provide a mere 7 sources backing an opinion and then claiming it is a consensus. Those who support race/IQ pseudoscience could do the same. Once again Knowledge (XXG) abides by
2596:
2709:
32:
3784:
that you asked an editor to drop by here and support you. If you attempt to edit the article on the basis of this patently false consensus, your edits will be reverted until there is an
485:
1005:
An IP editor is edit-warring content into the article that attributes DB in Venezuela to "critics", while adding poorly sourced text that argues that there hasn't been DB in Venezuela.
1620:
3961:
3632:
intro is identical, but includes an additional inline citation (and currently comes with the option of including an additional V-Dem Institute graph). Regarding the disadvantages of
1282:
The only source that directly challenges DB in Venezuela is an article in a journal that was titled 'Contemporary Marxism' before changing its name when the Soviet Union collapsed.
1176:
to rebut this broad academic assessment that Venezuela has experienced DB when the only source brought to the table is an article in a Marxist journal defending a socialist regime.
1845:, the American political system has institutional features that pose significant impediments to outright authoritarian rule, including high barriers to constitutional revision."
3211:. The lead makes it clear that democratic backsliding is the reduction of democratic qualities and does not necessarily require that the system was a democracy to begin with. (
1930:
the middle-income countries discussed later , the American political system has institutional features that pose significant impediments to outright authoritarian rule" means.
841:
makes no substantive mention of Denmark; it merely includes it on a map plus one list, in which Denmark's level of political rights and civil liberties is marked as unchanged.
3956:
837:
The source material does not "focus on Europe"; the Freedom House report talks about both Europe and many non-European nations, which are not flagged in our text. Also, the
813:
I think the additional listing of countries like Denmark is not due weight - it also skews the sentence to focus more on Europe. I agree with Snoo's critique above as well.
2589:
Why is the failed coup attempt against Chavez not mentioned? I would say trying to overthrow an elected government in favor of a non-elected one is a pretty good example.
868:
There's two reports: one from 2017 and one from 2019. It's undue weight to cherry-pick a component of the report, particularly an earlier report. It's understandable that
3659:
the reduced accuracy of this article seems to hardly apply considering the section here is an introduction to the application of democratic backsliding to the U.S. which
335:
317:
297:
3261:
1656:
may find this of interest. Hours wasted on pointless discussion and source-hunting about very basic uncontested text just because a sock was edit-warring on the page.
942:
fine with mentioning that, so long as we make clear (as the sources expressly do) that the scholarly consensus is that Hungary has experienced democratic backsliding.
883:
Do you also share a concern about inaccurately implying that countries like the USA have suffered the same degree of democratic backsliding as countries like Hungary?
274:
917:
The text is cited to mostly academic pieces, not "traditional opposion voices." If you have equivalent-quality sources, feel free to raise them here for discussion.
1301:
being supposedly Marxist is entirely irrelevant, its a peer-reviewed academic journal. Anyway, pretty much all political or social journals have political leanings.
3709:
It has clearly been objected to, since I reverted it - and I have reverted it again, as hyou have no consensus on this talk page for your edit. Get a consensus.
3946:
264:
1075:
3862:
Right wing libertarianism is directly responsible for the last 50 years of democratic backsliding yet not a single word about it appears here. Unbelievable.
185:
3660:
3629:
3257:
3951:
3931:
3184:
pressuring people to vote (e.g., missing an election means you need to re-register to vote in the future) in order to achieve suspiciously high turnouts.
175:
240:
3070:
We should change the lead image of the article back the one we originally used and move the graph to the "prevalence and trends" section. The original
2516:
557:
2388:
I agree with all of this. I have decided to take the first step in that direction with some recent reorganization and additions relating to Hungary.
793:
What won't fly, though, is calling out the US alongside Turkey and Hungary, but pretending the same source didn't also list Denmark, Spain or France.
520:
453:
3181:
political parties founded by prominent personalities with few policy statements but a strong desire to become president (Thailand and Indonesia)
2318:
I hope this will be acceptable to everyone; it's faithful to the source material and should put to rest any concerns about "lumping" the U.S. --
3941:
3936:
151:
3764:: "Consensus is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue." It appears to me that I have consensus.
2693:
231:
208:
3971:
443:
31:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
3646:
the "impediment to editing" is at least partially resolved by the template providing a one-click edit button to the excerpted article (as
1848:
Neither of those sources are currently in the article. If we are looking to add additional material from the literature, let me offer up:
1302:
1268:
1214:
1157:
1105:
1056:
1030:
755:
as clear cases of democratic backsliding, while it does not do so for Denmark (a state which is not suffering democratic backsliding).
606:
3404:
Democratic backsliding is a common academic term, so you'd have an uphill climb to demonstrate that any other term is more suitable. --
3090:
I don't think the other image is of more use. We don't know that the reader is most interested in recent events, and even if they were
3926:
1022:
3038:
2827:
Do these count on the democratic backsliding since it technically walks back on rights of people. This is the phrase I was thinking
2474:
2414:
3976:
2600:
1362:
1263:
allegations of "fringe", a single sentence is not undue weight. The multiple peer-reviewed academic journals provided establish the
2478:
736:. It is neither synth nor drivel to accurately quote the source, and editors are encouraged to try and keep it civil, if they can.
142:
103:
1758:
right-wing Law and Justice government; gains by anti-immigrant, nationalist parties in Europe; and Donald Trump's victory in the
838:
630:
585:
2232:
1966:
Here is alternative language that brings in more peer-reviewed journal articles and hews very carefully to the source material:
1353:
1021:
The onus is on you to show they are poor quality sources. Are academic journals low quality? Are you seriously arguing that the
3507:
2749:
2205:
852:
734:
2047:
78:
51:
28:
2920:
this merger because they are both practically the same thing, democratic recession should be made into part of this article.
1514:
3188:
And there are others which can be perceived as eroding the freedom and/or meaningfulness of elections in any given country.
2972:. I can understand reasons, and even though I would not be invested too much into the merger, I would not argue against it.
2831:
Recently Hungary also backslid in its view regarding LGBT rights in Hungary, creating a bill similar to the Section 28 bill.
3966:
3890:
1994:. Political scientists writing in 2017 and 2019 identified the United States as being in danger of democratic backsliding.
3577:
47:
3552:
3468:
3463:
is not met here. Just because something is verifiable does not mean it belongs in the lead of this particular article. (
3429:
3332:
3278:
3216:
3146:
3099:
2333:
2011:
1935:
1872:
1771:
1731:
1609:
888:
859:
828:
798:
753:
741:
481:
414:
375:
1052:
3670:
Therefore, in my view, one is trading reduced maintenance, improved content quality, and fostered collaboration (per
3881:
It is unclear whether democracy backsliding under the Moon Jae-In administration. Most democracy indices, including
3094:
means that recent episodes of democratic backsliding should not be given more weight than further behind episodes. (
1851:
1135:
2663:
2485:
rather than continuing to remove reliable information and personally criticizing the number of revisions I've made.
2233:"Is America Still Safe for Democracy: Why the United States Is in Danger of Backsliding Present at the Destruction"
1661:
1287:
1245:
1181:
1142:
1125:
1093:
1010:
760:
3204:
3894:
3848:
2977:
1490:
626:
581:
3898:
2550:
2546:
2512:
2482:
2377:
39:
3901:
3047:
2549:, an important part of ensuring NPOV. I hope this finally resolves the matter and you do not engage in further
2349:
1678:
1298:
1026:
2734:
perspective to that section. Hopefully people without a narrow minded agenda will help improve that section.
1695:
There is no need to revert my edits on European Countries the Source clearly states France, US Czech Rep. etc.
84:
3312:
Also, I assumed that the consensus about the title derived from human editors discussing it, not mere stats.
3882:
3828:
3795:
3742:
3714:
3585:
3496:
3452:
2925:
2791:
2329:
1931:
1868:
1767:
1727:
1637:
1605:
1306:
1272:
1218:
1161:
1109:
1060:
1034:
884:
855:
824:
794:
782:, in reports in 2017 and 2019, identified democratic backsliding in a variety of regions across the world.
737:
610:
418:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
3269:
3208:
2737:
2592:
2508:
2504:
2405:
2373:
1264:
602:
3844:
3625:
3580:. As for Wikivoice, again, I have no objection to it being rephrased in the form of "According to X...".
3171:
one political party has always been in power, despite small numbers of opposition parties in parliament).
2558:
2490:
2393:
926:
Thank you, Bozóki and NYT are traditional opposition voices. I read your response after adding sources...(
3756:
3120:
3091:
2745:
50:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
43:
3379:
3237:'s view of an open encyclopedia written primarily by experts (not ordinary users simply citing experts).
3129:
3080:
3002:
2960:
2881:
2862:
2659:
2442:
2422:
2293:
2250:
2085:
1837:
Let's be a little less selective in what we cherry to quote, shall we? From your own source (2nd one): "
1670:
1657:
1283:
1241:
1177:
1138:
1121:
1089:
1006:
756:
698:
646:
239:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
150:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3424:
The article is about change in democratic processes, not the current state of democracy in the world. (
3178:
one-party rule (Japan and Malaysia for a long time, Singapore still), which severely limits free choice
2066:"Rethinking "democratic backsliding" in Central and Eastern Europe – looking beyond Hungary and Poland"
2438:
2418:
694:
3886:
2973:
2854:
2839:
2712:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
2705:
2554:
2486:
2389:
2137:"Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the Narratives of Progress"
2136:
2113:
2065:
1922:
cherry-picked quotes from makes this distinction very clear and explicit - it clearly says the US is
1700:
1078:
3724:
1260:
1198:
474:
66:
3867:
3728:
3409:
2783:
2782:
move backwards towards authoritarianism which pales even in comparison to the modern growth of the
1674:
1653:
1453:"A tale of culture-bound regime evolution: the centennial democratic trend and its recent reversal"
1088:
to use this Marxist crap to rebut the broad academic assessment that Venezuela has experienced DB.
714:
678:
3904:
3761:
2183:"Opposition at the Margins: Strategies against the Erosion of Democracy in Colombia and Venezuela"
1714:
1491:"Opposition at the Margins: Strategies against the Erosion of Democracy in Colombia and Venezuela"
1229:
1210:
1154:
1085:
3824:
3791:
3769:
3752:
3738:
3710:
3700:
3685:
3611:
3581:
3492:
3448:
3356:
3317:
3299:
3246:
3193:
3055:
3022:
2921:
2813:
2787:
1633:
1372:
718:
565:
549:
536:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
516:
503:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
1764:
Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Hungary, Poland, Serbia and Spain, as well as the United States
1603:
1256:
1194:
1173:
1081:
1805:
321:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
3908:
2904:
2765:
2678:
2635:
2572:
2535:
2461:
2357:
2215:
2019:
1861:
1587:
1549:
1508:
1472:
1419:
1359:
957:
931:
907:
3460:
3348:
Who else determined the title? And will they automatically be pinged if I submit the request?
1233:
1202:
3674:
3650:
3636:
3618:
3548:
3464:
3425:
3375:
3328:
3274:
3212:
3142:
3125:
3095:
3076:
2998:
2942:
2877:
2858:
2278:"Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?"
1579:
1568:"Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?"
1541:
1464:
1411:
641:
329:
3072:
File:Countries democratizing or autocratizing substantially and significantly 2010–2020.svg
1237:
1206:
2835:
2650:
2617:
2319:
2306:
2263:
2237:
2210:
2098:
2032:
1913:
1829:
1816:
Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?
1741:
1718:
1696:
1384:
1080:
is a Marxist journal, and the content of the article is fringe nonsense. It utterly fails
943:
918:
899:
873:
842:
814:
656:
134:
3538:
Please don't just post a link, I cannot read your mind or interpret what you want to say.
2160:"Turkey Looks East: International Leverage and Democratic Backsliding in a Hybrid Regime"
1806:
Should we be afraid? Liberal democracy, democratic backsliding, and contemporary populism
3543:
693:
expansion on it explicitly as regions worldwide might convey things better. Thought ?
3863:
3529:
3405:
2741:
1983:
674:
599:
This article was entirely created from 2016-2017 sources. Needs more robust sourcing.
3695:
Now that this has sat in committee for a week without objection, I reinstate my edit.
2567:
Excuse me, I did not engage myself to any edit-warring, read back, I followed policy.(
1762:" and "The U.S.-based research organization found backward moves on democracy in the
309:
291:
128:
118:
97:
3920:
3818:
3765:
3696:
3681:
3508:"Despite global concerns about democracy, more than half of countries are democratic"
3352:
3313:
3295:
3242:
3189:
3051:
3018:
2809:
2716:
1971:
1055:
peer-reviewed academic journal is also used as a source, is this "low-quality" also?
779:
640:
I don't see it or any mention of right-wing. If you see a problem, edit the article.
561:
3663:'s intro (as the article title and selected section suggests) would match perfectly,
3174:
Some suggestions based on my experience of living in East Asia for several decades:
2626:
the United States of America is the only country in Western Europe and North America
1240:
are all Wiki policies about how we should not lend undue weight to fringe opinions.
20:
3234:
2956:
2898:
2761:
2674:
2646:
2631:
2568:
2531:
2457:
2353:
1726:
Does any source support misleadingly lumping in places like the US with Venezuela?
953:
927:
903:
673:
same thing: "we hate democracy". And that is some kind of slant? Reality exists.
236:
3912:
3871:
3852:
3832:
3799:
3773:
3746:
3732:
3718:
3704:
3689:
3589:
3563:
3533:
3500:
3479:
3440:
3413:
3383:
3360:
3343:
3321:
3303:
3289:
3250:
3227:
3197:
3157:
3133:
3110:
3084:
3059:
3042:
3026:
3006:
2981:
2964:
2946:
2929:
2911:
2885:
2866:
2843:
2817:
2795:
2769:
2753:
2723:
2682:
2667:
2653:
2639:
2604:
2576:
2562:
2539:
2520:
2494:
2465:
2446:
2426:
2397:
2381:
2361:
2337:
2322:
1939:
1916:
1876:
1832:
1775:
1744:
1735:
1721:
1704:
1682:
1665:
1641:
1627:
1613:
1468:
1310:
1291:
1276:
1249:
1222:
1185:
1165:
1146:
1129:
1113:
1097:
1064:
1038:
1014:
961:
946:
935:
921:
911:
892:
876:
863:
845:
832:
817:
802:
764:
745:
722:
702:
682:
659:
649:
634:
614:
589:
569:
390:
369:
2808:
This page needs a section on Benin, there are numerous sources discussing this.--
1619:
I'm not sure why people are arguing with this IP editor; it's an obvious sock of
3666:
and decreased visibility of changes I would see as the only viable counterpoint.
3557:
3484:
It is not appropriate because it is verifiable, it is appropriate because it is
3473:
3434:
3337:
3283:
3221:
3151:
3116:
3104:
2938:
2114:"Understanding the illiberal turn: democratic backsliding in the Czech Republic"
1452:
869:
532:
499:
400:
1624:
1583:
406:
396:
223:
202:
124:
3737:
So, how did you happen to come here, since you've never edited this article?
3370:(my computer doesn't even recognize this word), or the nearly unused term of
2710:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 11#Authoritazation
2630:
beginning....make it clear that USA is NOT in Western Europe, etc. Thank You(
2218:
2206:"The Final Blow to Venezuela's Democracy: What Latin America Can Do About It"
2182:
1839:
a transition to competitive authoritarianism in the United States is unlikely
1590:
1552:
1545:
1475:
1422:
1415:
778:
would be ok with a rewrite along the lines of "The U.S.-based research group
333:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
3523:
2277:
1991:
2159:
1529:
1399:
790:
and Venzuela were called out as clear examples in other sources as well."
323:
147:
3124:
would be impossible to communicate with text alone in the lead section.
2700:
1975:
1530:"Transformations through Polarizations and Global Threats to Democracy"
783:
3790:
consensus by users who regularly edit this article, not by drive-bys.
2893:
they are both on the same topic and it would be better as a redirect.
1400:"Déjà vu? Polarization and Endangered Democracies in the 21st Century"
1987:
1979:
787:
3075:
if a person only wants to read the lead section, as many people do.
2729:
Recency bias and narrow minded thinking in the United States section
1358:(2nd edition ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. 2019.
1077:
says as far as I can tell nothing about democratic backsliding. This
1267:
of the scholarly viewpoint you wish to whitewash from this article.
3268:
also indicates the current title has been more common since 2015.
1534:
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
1451:
Brunkert, Lennart; Kruse, Stefan; Welzel, Christian (2019-04-03).
3843:
under netanyahu israel has gone a severe democratic backsliding
3839:
Israel should have its own page about its democratic backsliding
2048:"Democratic backsliding threatens international order: report"
469:
419:
60:
15:
3897:
are significantly improved during Moon's presidency. (Source:
854:." How is it undue weight to reflect what this source says?
1800:
I mean, a cursory look at the literature will reveal this:
1843:
In contrast to the middle-income countries discussed later
625:
Anti-right-wing slant is quite prevalent in the article.--
38:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
3755:
And why is that relevant, except to help prove my point?
2350:
Talk:Judiciary of Poland#Judicial independence in Poland
667:
Anti-right-wing slant is quite prevalent in the article.
3264:
for "democratic backsliding" in the same time period.
1862:
Is Western democracy backsliding? Diagnosing the risks
2704:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
527:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
345:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Elections and Referendums
3858:
This article misses the entire topic by a light year
2456:
informative of the possible concerns and situation.(
1297:
Read the articles, they clearly challenge the view.
235:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
146:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
3569:we have only one estimate at hand at the moment is
1926:like Venezuela, Turkey, and Hungary. That's what "
1754:vote to leave the European Union; the policies of
2823:Democratic backsliding regarding LGBTQ+ rights???
989:Low-quality sources used to rebut DB in Venezuela
2112:Seán Hanley & Milada Anna Vachudova (2018).
1673:, I was away and only seeing this now - crazy!.
1968:
752:Hungary and Poland in its summary of the report
3962:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
2658:I don't see a problem with Neutrality's edit.
348:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
3614:I'm sorry, but I continue to fail to see why
3260:on Google Scholar (2010-present) compared to
1566:Haggard, Stephan; Kaufman, Robert R. (2019).
8:
1528:Somer, Murat; McCoy, Jennifer (2019-01-01).
1398:Somer, Murat; McCoy, Jennifer (2018-01-01).
3661:Democratic backsliding in the United States
3630:Democratic backsliding in the United States
2786:. That is not "recentism", that's factual.
1602:I've opened a discussion about this here -
3957:C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
2590:
2502:
2204:Sabatini, Christopher (November 1, 2016).
1691:Unexplained reverts by Here come the Suns.
993:
600:
364:
286:
197:
92:
558:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
1440:. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 74.
249:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Human rights
2003:
1344:
556:Above undated message substituted from
366:
288:
199:
94:
64:
3163:Suggested Rename: Erosion of Democracy
2302:
2291:
2259:
2248:
2094:
2083:
2028:
2017:
1506:
1380:
1370:
666:
580:Should the article have a talk page?--
3947:High-importance Human rights articles
3035:2601:140:C002:8C60:B8F3:F89F:C4A3:1A2
2955:due to the similarity of the topics.
2475:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
2415:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
2158:Kadir Akyuz & Steve Hess (2018).
318:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
7:
3642:according to its own documentation,
2597:2A02:A442:581E:1:135A:2130:D641:6009
2479:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest
1436:"The Myth of Democratic Recession".
412:This article is within the scope of
315:This article is within the scope of
229:This article is within the scope of
160:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
140:This article is within the scope of
2545:I have modified your edit to avoid
2141:South European Society and Politics
484:on 4 September 2017. The result of
422:and the subjects encompassed by it.
83:It is of interest to the following
2027:Cite has empty unknown parameter:
1023:Latin American Studies Association
541:
537:
508:
504:
351:Elections and Referendums articles
14:
3952:WikiProject Human rights articles
3932:High-importance politics articles
3420:Irrelevant statistics in the lead
2849:Merge with "Democratic recession"
252:Template:WikiProject Human rights
3528:
2987:
2699:
2046:Esther King (January 31, 2017).
544:. Further details are available
531:
511:. Further details are available
498:
473:
399:
389:
368:
308:
290:
222:
201:
127:
117:
96:
65:
19:
3241:want to be more flexible here.
2708:. The discussion will occur at
2344:Judicial independence in Poland
1155:Knowledge (XXG) does not censor
480:This article was nominated for
448:This article has been rated as
428:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
269:This article has been rated as
180:This article has been rated as
2683:11:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
2668:01:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
2654:01:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
2640:01:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
2338:23:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
2323:23:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1970:The U.S.-based research group
1940:23:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1917:22:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1877:21:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1856:Scandinavian Political Studies
1833:21:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1776:20:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1745:20:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1736:20:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1722:20:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1705:19:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
3942:C-Class Human rights articles
3937:WikiProject Politics articles
3891:The Economist Democracy Index
3690:18:00, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
3506:DeSilver, Drew (2020-05-30).
3060:21:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
2912:01:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
2796:06:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
2770:05:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
2754:10:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
2724:20:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
2622:, still, such is impossible:
2605:11:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
1810:Contemporary Political Theory
1666:16:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
1642:13:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
1628:17:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1614:16:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1469:10.1080/13510347.2018.1542430
1404:American Behavioral Scientist
1311:14:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1292:14:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1277:13:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1250:13:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1223:13:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1186:13:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1166:13:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1147:13:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1130:13:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1114:12:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1098:12:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1065:12:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1039:12:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
1015:12:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
962:10:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
947:22:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
936:21:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
922:21:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
912:21:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
893:22:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
877:16:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
864:15:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
846:15:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
833:14:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
818:02:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
803:00:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
765:00:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
746:23:57, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
615:23:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
243:and see a list of open tasks.
163:Template:WikiProject Politics
154:and see a list of open tasks.
52:contentious topics procedures
3833:17:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
3800:22:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
3774:19:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
3747:02:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
3733:01:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
3719:22:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
3705:18:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
3590:05:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
3564:04:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
3534:11:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
3501:08:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
3480:08:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
3441:07:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
3043:10:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
2886:22:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
2867:22:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
2692:"Authoritazation" listed at
2551:Knowledge (XXG):Edit warring
2547:Knowledge (XXG):FALSEBALANCE
2483:Knowledge (XXG):Edit warring
2362:09:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
1683:13:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
660:15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
650:10:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
635:09:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
570:19:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
3972:Mid-importance law articles
3913:13:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
3544:According to some estimates
3414:18:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
2135:Cemal Burak Tansel (2018).
1841:, although not impossible.
1053:Latin American Perspectives
3993:
3027:00:43, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
2982:12:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
2947:14:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
2930:14:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
2818:11:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
2466:19:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
2398:01:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
1513:: CS1 maint: url-status (
723:13:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
703:02:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
454:project's importance scale
275:project's importance scale
186:project's importance scale
40:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
3927:C-Class politics articles
3895:World Press Freedom Index
3872:22:31, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
3853:17:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
3823:I withdraw my objection.
3384:16:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
3361:03:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
3344:00:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
3322:23:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
3304:22:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
3290:22:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
3251:21:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
3228:16:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
3198:11:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
3158:15:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
3134:15:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
3121:Knowledge (XXG):Recentism
3119:: That isn't really what
2965:12:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
2844:13:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
2447:13:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
2382:12:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
1584:10.1017/S1537592718003377
1193:This is nothing short of
839:2019 Freedom House report
773:of the linked source is "
683:23:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
590:03:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
447:
384:
342:Elections and Referendums
303:
298:Elections and Referendums
268:
217:
179:
112:
91:
54:before editing this page.
3977:WikiProject Law articles
3778:Aciually, it appears to
3111:23:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
3085:23:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
3066:Change the opening image
3007:01:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
2694:Redirects for discussion
2427:12:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
2282:Perspectives on Politics
1865:The Journal of Democracy
1820:Perspectives on Politics
1572:Perspectives on Politics
1546:10.1177/0002716218818058
1416:10.1177/0002764218760371
1299:Social Justice (journal)
1027:Social Justice (journal)
431:Template:WikiProject Law
232:WikiProject Human rights
48:normal editorial process
3883:V-Dem Democracy Indices
2577:21:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
2563:14:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
2540:00:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
2521:11:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
2495:17:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
2164:Mediterranean Quarterly
1632:Sock edits struck out.
35:as a contentious topic.
2118:East European Politics
2070:East European Politics
2014:. Freedom House. 2019.
2012:"Democracy in Retreat"
1996:
1495:www.ingentaconnect.com
1489:Gamboa, Laura (2017).
775:Democratic backsliding
627:Democratic Backsliding
582:Democratic Backsliding
73:This article is rated
44:standards of behaviour
3624:is undesired for the
2181:Laura Gamboa (2017).
1852:A Democratic Paradox?
1438:Democracy in Decline?
708:Improving the article
621:Anti-right-wing slant
548:. Student editor(s):
515:. Student editor(s):
255:Human rights articles
77:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
3967:C-Class law articles
3887:Freedom in the World
3372:Erosion of democracy
2855:Democratic recession
2187:Comparative Politics
143:WikiProject Politics
3656:itself points out),
3578:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
3512:Pew Research Center
2784:Imperial presidency
2328:I am ok with this.
2288:(2): 417–432. 2019.
1255:Putting aside your
1029:are "low quality"?
2348:See discussion at
2330:Here come the Suns
2301:Unknown parameter
2258:Unknown parameter
2093:Unknown parameter
1932:Here come the Suns
1869:Here come the Suns
1768:Here come the Suns
1728:Here come the Suns
1606:Here come the Suns
885:Here come the Suns
856:Here come the Suns
825:Here come the Suns
795:Here come the Suns
738:Here come the Suns
546:on the course page
513:on the course page
79:content assessment
29:contentious topics
3207:criteria such as
2740:comment added by
2607:
2595:comment added by
2523:
2507:comment added by
2384:Piotr Marczyński
2076:: 243–256. 2018.
1649:
1648:
688:Regional recaps ?
617:
605:comment added by
496:
495:
468:
467:
464:
463:
460:
459:
363:
362:
359:
358:
285:
284:
281:
280:
196:
195:
192:
191:
166:politics articles
59:
58:
3984:
3822:
3679:
3673:
3655:
3649:
3641:
3635:
3623:
3617:
3606:Excerpt template
3560:
3532:
3526:
3521:
3519:
3518:
3476:
3437:
3340:
3286:
3224:
3205:WP:Article title
3154:
3107:
2994:
2991:
2990:
2910:
2907:
2901:
2756:
2703:
2660:Snooganssnoogans
2621:
2509:Piotr Marczyński
2406:Piotr Marczyński
2374:Piotr Marczyński
2311:
2310:
2304:
2299:
2297:
2289:
2274:
2268:
2267:
2261:
2256:
2254:
2246:
2229:
2223:
2222:
2201:
2195:
2194:
2178:
2172:
2171:
2155:
2149:
2148:
2132:
2126:
2125:
2109:
2103:
2102:
2096:
2091:
2089:
2081:
2062:
2056:
2055:
2043:
2037:
2036:
2030:
2025:
2023:
2015:
2008:
1671:Snooganssnoogans
1658:Snooganssnoogans
1595:
1594:
1563:
1557:
1556:
1525:
1519:
1518:
1512:
1504:
1502:
1501:
1486:
1480:
1479:
1448:
1442:
1441:
1433:
1427:
1426:
1395:
1389:
1388:
1383:has extra text (
1382:
1378:
1376:
1368:
1349:
1284:Snooganssnoogans
1242:Snooganssnoogans
1178:Snooganssnoogans
1139:Snooganssnoogans
1122:Snooganssnoogans
1090:Snooganssnoogans
1007:Snooganssnoogans
994:
757:Snooganssnoogans
644:
572:
543:
539:
535:
521:article contribs
510:
506:
502:
477:
470:
436:
435:
432:
429:
426:
409:
404:
403:
393:
386:
385:
380:
372:
365:
353:
352:
349:
346:
343:
336:our project page
330:electoral reform
312:
305:
304:
294:
287:
257:
256:
253:
250:
247:
226:
219:
218:
213:
205:
198:
168:
167:
164:
161:
158:
137:
132:
131:
121:
114:
113:
108:
100:
93:
76:
70:
69:
61:
23:
16:
3992:
3991:
3987:
3986:
3985:
3983:
3982:
3981:
3917:
3916:
3879:
3860:
3845:Monochromemelo1
3841:
3816:
3723:Prefer excerpt
3677:
3671:
3653:
3647:
3639:
3633:
3621:
3615:
3608:
3558:
3522:
3516:
3514:
3505:
3474:
3435:
3422:
3368:Autocratization
3338:
3284:
3222:
3165:
3152:
3105:
3068:
3014:
2992:
2988:
2974:InvadingInvader
2905:
2899:
2894:
2851:
2825:
2806:
2735:
2731:
2715:
2706:Authoritazation
2697:
2615:
2613:
2434:
2369:
2346:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2300:
2290:
2276:
2275:
2271:
2257:
2247:
2238:Foreign Affairs
2231:
2230:
2226:
2211:Foreign Affairs
2203:
2202:
2198:
2180:
2179:
2175:
2157:
2156:
2152:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2111:
2110:
2106:
2092:
2082:
2064:
2063:
2059:
2045:
2044:
2040:
2026:
2016:
2010:
2009:
2005:
1964:
1693:
1650:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1565:
1564:
1560:
1527:
1526:
1522:
1505:
1499:
1497:
1488:
1487:
1483:
1457:Democratization
1450:
1449:
1445:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1379:
1369:
1365:
1355:Democratization
1351:
1350:
1346:
999:
991:
730:
710:
690:
642:
623:
597:
578:
555:
538:26 January 2021
529:
505:26 January 2021
433:
430:
427:
424:
423:
415:WikiProject Law
405:
398:
378:
350:
347:
344:
341:
340:
271:High-importance
254:
251:
248:
245:
244:
212:High‑importance
211:
182:High-importance
165:
162:
159:
156:
155:
135:Politics portal
133:
126:
107:High‑importance
106:
74:
42:, any expected
12:
11:
5:
3990:
3988:
3980:
3979:
3974:
3969:
3964:
3959:
3954:
3949:
3944:
3939:
3934:
3929:
3919:
3918:
3878:
3875:
3859:
3856:
3840:
3837:
3836:
3835:
3813:
3812:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3805:
3804:
3803:
3802:
3759:
3668:
3667:
3664:
3657:
3626:#United States
3607:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3595:
3594:
3593:
3592:
3539:
3421:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3401:
3400:
3399:
3398:
3397:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3390:
3389:
3388:
3387:
3386:
3376:aaronneallucas
3349:
3310:
3238:
3186:
3185:
3182:
3179:
3164:
3161:
3139:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3126:aaronneallucas
3077:aaronneallucas
3067:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3045:
3013:
3010:
2999:aaronneallucas
2985:
2984:
2967:
2949:
2932:
2914:
2888:
2878:aaronneallucas
2859:aaronneallucas
2850:
2847:
2833:
2832:
2824:
2821:
2805:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2730:
2727:
2713:
2696:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2656:
2612:
2609:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2498:
2497:
2451:
2433:
2430:
2410:
2409:
2401:
2400:
2368:
2365:
2345:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2313:
2312:
2269:
2224:
2196:
2173:
2150:
2127:
2104:
2057:
2038:
2002:
2001:
1997:
1984:Czech Republic
1963:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1928:In contrast to
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1859:
1846:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1813:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1692:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1675:Britishfinance
1654:Britishfinance
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1630:
1621:Claíomh Solais
1597:
1596:
1578:(2): 417–432.
1558:
1520:
1481:
1463:(3): 422–443.
1443:
1428:
1390:
1363:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1228:That's false.
1132:
1069:
1068:
1043:
1042:
1001:
1000:
997:
992:
990:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
897:
896:
895:
808:
807:
806:
805:
791:
729:
726:
709:
706:
689:
686:
670:
669:
663:
662:
652:
622:
619:
596:
593:
577:
574:
528:
525:
494:
493:
486:the discussion
478:
466:
465:
462:
461:
458:
457:
450:Mid-importance
446:
440:
439:
437:
411:
410:
394:
382:
381:
379:Mid‑importance
373:
361:
360:
357:
356:
354:
313:
301:
300:
295:
283:
282:
279:
278:
267:
261:
260:
258:
241:the discussion
227:
215:
214:
206:
194:
193:
190:
189:
178:
172:
171:
169:
152:the discussion
139:
138:
122:
110:
109:
101:
89:
88:
82:
71:
57:
56:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3989:
3978:
3975:
3973:
3970:
3968:
3965:
3963:
3960:
3958:
3955:
3953:
3950:
3948:
3945:
3943:
3940:
3938:
3935:
3933:
3930:
3928:
3925:
3924:
3922:
3915:
3914:
3910:
3906:
3902:
3899:
3896:
3892:
3888:
3884:
3876:
3874:
3873:
3869:
3865:
3857:
3855:
3854:
3850:
3846:
3838:
3834:
3830:
3826:
3825:Beyond My Ken
3820:
3815:
3814:
3801:
3797:
3793:
3792:Beyond My Ken
3789:
3788:
3783:
3782:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3771:
3767:
3763:
3760:
3758:
3754:
3753:Beyond My Ken
3750:
3749:
3748:
3744:
3740:
3739:Beyond My Ken
3736:
3735:
3734:
3730:
3726:
3722:
3721:
3720:
3716:
3712:
3711:Beyond My Ken
3708:
3707:
3706:
3702:
3698:
3694:
3693:
3692:
3691:
3687:
3683:
3676:
3665:
3662:
3658:
3652:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3638:
3631:
3628:section. The
3627:
3620:
3613:
3612:Beyond My Ken
3605:
3591:
3587:
3583:
3582:Beyond My Ken
3579:
3574:
3573:
3567:
3566:
3565:
3562:
3561:
3554:
3550:
3545:
3540:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3531:
3525:
3513:
3509:
3504:
3503:
3502:
3498:
3494:
3493:Beyond My Ken
3489:
3488:
3483:
3482:
3481:
3478:
3477:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3457:
3456:
3454:
3450:
3449:Beyond My Ken
3445:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3439:
3438:
3431:
3427:
3419:
3415:
3411:
3407:
3403:
3402:
3385:
3381:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3347:
3346:
3345:
3342:
3341:
3334:
3330:
3325:
3324:
3323:
3319:
3315:
3311:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3301:
3297:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3288:
3287:
3280:
3276:
3271:
3270:WP:COMMONNAME
3267:
3266:Google NGRAMS
3263:
3262:8,100 results
3259:
3258:3,650 results
3254:
3253:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3239:
3236:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3226:
3225:
3218:
3214:
3210:
3209:WP:COMMONNAME
3206:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3199:
3195:
3191:
3183:
3180:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3172:
3168:
3162:
3160:
3159:
3156:
3155:
3148:
3144:
3135:
3131:
3127:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3109:
3108:
3101:
3097:
3093:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3082:
3078:
3073:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3046:
3044:
3040:
3036:
3031:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3024:
3020:
3011:
3009:
3008:
3004:
3000:
2997:
2983:
2979:
2975:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2962:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2936:
2933:
2931:
2927:
2923:
2922:BubbaDaAmogus
2919:
2915:
2913:
2908:
2902:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2876:this merger.
2875:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2853:The article "
2848:
2846:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2822:
2820:
2819:
2815:
2811:
2803:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2788:Beyond My Ken
2785:
2781:
2780:
2774:
2773:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2728:
2726:
2725:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2711:
2707:
2702:
2695:
2691:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2655:
2652:
2648:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2610:
2608:
2606:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2543:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2453:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2431:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2407:
2403:
2402:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2366:
2364:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2321:
2308:
2295:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2273:
2270:
2265:
2252:
2244:
2240:
2239:
2234:
2228:
2225:
2220:
2217:
2213:
2212:
2207:
2200:
2197:
2193:(4): 457–477.
2192:
2188:
2184:
2177:
2174:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2154:
2151:
2147:(2): 197-217.
2146:
2142:
2138:
2131:
2128:
2124:(3): 276–296.
2123:
2119:
2115:
2108:
2105:
2100:
2087:
2080:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2061:
2058:
2053:
2049:
2042:
2039:
2034:
2021:
2013:
2007:
2004:
2000:
1995:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1972:Freedom House
1967:
1961:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1915:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1863:
1860:
1857:
1853:
1850:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1831:
1828:
1821:
1817:
1814:
1811:
1807:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1743:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1720:
1716:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1690:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1652:
1651:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1634:Beyond My Ken
1631:
1629:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1604:
1592:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1562:
1559:
1554:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1524:
1521:
1516:
1510:
1496:
1492:
1485:
1482:
1477:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1447:
1444:
1439:
1432:
1429:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1394:
1391:
1386:
1374:
1366:
1364:9780198732280
1361:
1357:
1356:
1348:
1345:
1341:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1303:80.111.165.52
1300:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1269:80.111.165.52
1266:
1265:WP:NOTABILITY
1262:
1258:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:80.111.165.52
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:80.111.165.52
1156:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:80.111.165.52
1101:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1057:80.111.165.52
1054:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1031:80.111.165.52
1028:
1024:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
1002:
996:
995:
988:
963:
959:
955:
950:
949:
948:
945:
940:
939:
937:
933:
929:
925:
924:
923:
920:
916:
915:
913:
909:
905:
901:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:
847:
844:
840:
836:
835:
834:
830:
826:
821:
820:
819:
816:
812:
811:
810:
809:
804:
800:
796:
792:
789:
785:
781:
780:Freedom House
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
754:
750:
749:
748:
747:
743:
739:
735:
727:
725:
724:
720:
716:
707:
705:
704:
700:
696:
687:
685:
684:
680:
676:
668:
665:
664:
661:
658:
653:
651:
648:
645:
639:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
620:
618:
616:
612:
608:
607:66.18.217.119
604:
595:older sources
594:
592:
591:
587:
583:
575:
573:
571:
567:
563:
559:
553:
551:
550:Yupthatsmethx
547:
542:29 April 2021
534:
526:
524:
522:
518:
517:Yupthatsmethx
514:
509:29 April 2021
501:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
472:
471:
455:
451:
445:
442:
441:
438:
421:
417:
416:
408:
402:
397:
395:
392:
388:
387:
383:
377:
374:
371:
367:
355:
338:
337:
332:
331:
326:
325:
320:
319:
314:
311:
307:
306:
302:
299:
296:
293:
289:
276:
272:
266:
263:
262:
259:
242:
238:
234:
233:
228:
225:
221:
220:
216:
210:
207:
204:
200:
187:
183:
177:
174:
173:
170:
153:
149:
145:
144:
136:
130:
125:
123:
120:
116:
115:
111:
105:
102:
99:
95:
90:
86:
80:
72:
68:
63:
62:
55:
53:
49:
45:
41:
36:
34:
30:
25:
22:
18:
17:
3880:
3861:
3842:
3786:
3785:
3780:
3779:
3757:WP:GOODFAITH
3669:
3609:
3571:
3570:
3556:
3515:. Retrieved
3511:
3486:
3485:
3472:
3433:
3423:
3371:
3367:
3336:
3282:
3235:Larry Sanger
3220:
3187:
3173:
3169:
3166:
3150:
3140:
3103:
3092:WP:RECENTISM
3069:
3015:
2995:
2986:
2969:
2952:
2934:
2917:
2890:
2873:
2852:
2834:
2826:
2807:
2778:
2777:
2736:— Preceding
2732:
2718:
2717:
2698:
2625:
2624:
2614:
2611:Recent edits
2591:— Preceding
2588:
2503:— Preceding
2499:
2477:and also on
2454:
2452:ComradeZ97,
2450:
2435:
2411:
2370:
2347:
2317:
2294:cite journal
2285:
2281:
2272:
2251:cite journal
2242:
2236:
2227:
2209:
2199:
2190:
2186:
2176:
2167:
2163:
2153:
2144:
2140:
2130:
2121:
2117:
2107:
2086:cite journal
2077:
2073:
2069:
2060:
2051:
2041:
2006:
1998:
1969:
1965:
1962:Alt language
1927:
1923:
1864:
1855:
1842:
1838:
1819:
1809:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1694:
1601:
1575:
1571:
1561:
1537:
1533:
1523:
1498:. Retrieved
1494:
1484:
1460:
1456:
1446:
1437:
1431:
1407:
1403:
1393:
1354:
1347:
1339:
1296:
1254:
1192:
1151:
1102:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1020:
1004:
998:Sock editing
774:
770:
731:
711:
691:
671:
624:
601:— Preceding
598:
579:
554:
530:
497:
489:
449:
434:law articles
413:
334:
328:
322:
316:
270:
246:Human rights
237:Human rights
230:
209:Human rights
181:
141:
85:WikiProjects
37:
26:
3877:Moon Jae-In
2673:primarily.(
2439:FefeliceUva
2419:FefeliceUva
2367:CEE section
1540:(1): 8–22.
1410:(1): 3–15.
1134:This source
1074:This source
870:politico.eu
695:Markbassett
643:Doug Weller
420:legal field
3921:Categories
3517:2022-10-26
2836:Chefs-kiss
2651:Neutrality
2618:Neutrality
2555:ComradeZ97
2487:ComradeZ97
2390:ComradeZ97
2320:Neutrality
2245:(1). 2017.
2170:(2): 1–26.
2029:|dead-url=
1999:References
1914:Neutrality
1830:Neutrality
1742:Neutrality
1719:Neutrality
1697:Mr.User200
1500:2019-09-05
1340:References
1261:WP:CRYSTAL
1199:WP:CRYSTAL
944:Neutrality
919:Neutrality
900:Neutrality
874:Neutrality
843:Neutrality
815:Neutrality
657:Neutrality
576:Talk page?
407:Law portal
33:designated
3864:Viriditas
3762:WP:DETCON
3725:HudecEmil
3406:Aquillion
2742:Jamescart
2432:Venezuela
2305:ignored (
2303:|authors=
2262:ignored (
2260:|authors=
2219:0015-7120
2097:ignored (
2095:|authors=
1992:Venezuela
1752:Britain’s
1715:WP:WEIGHT
1591:1537-5927
1553:0002-7162
1476:1351-0347
1423:0002-7642
1381:|edition=
1373:cite book
1230:WP:FRINGE
1211:WP:CENSOR
1086:WP:FRINGE
675:Viriditas
324:elections
46:, or any
3819:Anderjef
3766:Anderjef
3697:Anderjef
3682:Anderjef
3487:relevant
3353:Martindo
3314:Martindo
3296:Martindo
3243:Martindo
3190:Martindo
3052:Kiwi Rex
3019:Sawyersx
2810:Pokelova
2760:Agreed.(
2750:contribs
2738:unsigned
2719:Rosguill
2714:signed,
2593:unsigned
2517:contribs
2505:unsigned
2052:Politico
2020:cite web
1756:Poland's
1509:cite web
1257:WP:SYNTH
1195:WP:SYNTH
1174:WP:UNDUE
1082:WP:UNDUE
771:headline
715:JuulMetz
603:unsigned
562:PrimeBOT
482:deletion
157:Politics
148:politics
104:Politics
3905:Migupla
3675:Excerpt
3651:Excerpt
3637:Excerpt
3619:Excerpt
3461:WP:ONUS
3309:Buidhe.
3012:Brazil?
2970:Neutral
2957:Ryme071
2953:support
2935:support
2918:support
2916:I also
2900:Wgullyn
2891:support
2874:support
2762:KIENGIR
2675:KIENGIR
2647:KIENGIR
2632:KIENGIR
2569:KIENGIR
2532:KIENGIR
2458:KIENGIR
2354:Whizz40
2079:Poland.
1976:Hungary
1912:point.
1234:WP:NPOV
1203:WP:NPOV
954:KIENGIR
928:KIENGIR
904:KIENGIR
784:Hungary
452:on the
273:on the
184:on the
75:C-class
3787:actual
3559:buidhe
3475:buidhe
3436:buidhe
3339:buidhe
3285:buidhe
3223:buidhe
3153:buidhe
3117:Buidhe
3106:buidhe
2939:Agnerf
2628:-: -->
1990:, and
1988:Turkey
1982:, the
1980:Poland
1352:"20".
1238:WP:DUE
1207:WP:BLP
788:Turkey
728:Synth?
81:scale.
2996:Done.
2897:: -->
2896:: -->
2895:: -->
2804:Benin
2779:major
2404:Dear
1625:Jayjg
3909:talk
3868:talk
3849:talk
3829:talk
3796:talk
3770:talk
3743:talk
3729:talk
3715:talk
3701:talk
3686:talk
3586:talk
3524:Moxy
3497:talk
3453:talk
3410:talk
3380:talk
3357:talk
3318:talk
3300:talk
3247:talk
3194:talk
3130:talk
3081:talk
3056:talk
3048:Ahem
3039:talk
3023:talk
3003:talk
2978:talk
2961:talk
2943:talk
2926:talk
2906:talk
2882:talk
2863:talk
2840:talk
2814:talk
2792:talk
2766:talk
2746:talk
2679:talk
2664:talk
2636:talk
2601:talk
2573:talk
2559:talk
2536:talk
2513:talk
2491:talk
2462:talk
2443:talk
2423:talk
2394:talk
2378:talk
2358:talk
2334:talk
2307:help
2264:help
2216:ISSN
2099:help
2033:help
1978:and
1936:talk
1873:talk
1772:talk
1760:U.S.
1732:talk
1701:talk
1679:talk
1662:talk
1638:talk
1610:talk
1588:ISSN
1550:ISSN
1515:link
1473:ISSN
1420:ISSN
1385:help
1360:ISBN
1307:talk
1288:talk
1273:talk
1259:and
1246:talk
1236:and
1219:talk
1209:and
1197:and
1182:talk
1162:talk
1143:talk
1126:talk
1110:talk
1094:talk
1084:and
1061:talk
1051:The
1035:talk
1025:and
1011:talk
958:talk
932:talk
908:talk
889:talk
860:talk
829:talk
799:talk
769:The
761:talk
742:talk
719:talk
699:talk
679:talk
647:talk
631:talk
611:talk
586:talk
566:talk
540:and
507:and
490:keep
488:was
265:High
176:High
27:The
3572:not
2909:();
1924:not
1766:."
1717:).
1580:doi
1542:doi
1538:681
1465:doi
1412:doi
560:by
523:).
444:Mid
425:Law
376:Law
3923::
3911:)
3903:)
3900:,
3893:,
3889:,
3885:,
3870:)
3851:)
3831:)
3798:)
3781:me
3772:)
3745:)
3731:)
3717:)
3703:)
3688:)
3678:}}
3672:{{
3654:}}
3648:{{
3640:}}
3634:{{
3622:}}
3616:{{
3588:)
3555:)
3551:·
3510:.
3499:)
3471:)
3467:·
3455:)
3432:)
3428:·
3412:)
3382:)
3374:.
3359:)
3335:)
3331:·
3320:)
3302:)
3281:)
3277:·
3249:)
3219:)
3215:·
3196:)
3149:)
3145:·
3132:)
3102:)
3098:·
3083:)
3058:)
3041:)
3025:)
3005:)
2980:)
2963:)
2951:I
2945:)
2937:.
2928:)
2884:)
2872:I
2865:)
2842:)
2816:)
2794:)
2772:)
2768:)
2752:)
2748:•
2681:)
2666:)
2642:)
2638:)
2603:)
2575:)
2561:)
2553:.
2542:)
2538:)
2519:)
2515:•
2493:)
2468:)
2464:)
2445:)
2425:)
2396:)
2380:)
2360:)
2352:.
2336:)
2298::
2296:}}
2292:{{
2286:17
2284:.
2280:.
2255::
2253:}}
2249:{{
2243:96
2241:.
2235:.
2214:.
2208:.
2191:49
2189:.
2185:.
2168:29
2166:.
2162:.
2145:23
2143:.
2139:.
2122:34
2120:.
2116:.
2090::
2088:}}
2084:{{
2074:34
2072:.
2068:.
2050:.
2024::
2022:}}
2018:{{
1986:,
1938:)
1875:)
1854:,
1818:,
1808:,
1774:)
1734:)
1703:)
1681:)
1664:)
1640:)
1623:.
1612:)
1586:.
1576:17
1574:.
1570:.
1548:.
1536:.
1532:.
1511:}}
1507:{{
1493:.
1471:.
1461:26
1459:.
1455:.
1418:.
1408:62
1406:.
1402:.
1377::
1375:}}
1371:{{
1309:)
1290:)
1275:)
1248:)
1232:,
1221:)
1205:,
1184:)
1164:)
1145:)
1128:)
1112:)
1096:)
1063:)
1037:)
1013:)
960:)
938:)
934:)
914:)
910:)
891:)
862:)
831:)
801:)
786:,
763:)
744:)
721:)
701:)
681:)
633:)
613:)
588:)
568:)
552:.
327:,
3907:(
3866:(
3847:(
3827:(
3821::
3817:@
3794:(
3768:(
3751:@
3741:(
3727:(
3713:(
3699:(
3684:(
3610:@
3584:(
3553:c
3549:t
3547:(
3527:-
3520:.
3495:(
3469:c
3465:t
3451:(
3430:c
3426:t
3408:(
3378:(
3355:(
3333:c
3329:t
3327:(
3316:(
3298:(
3279:c
3275:t
3273:(
3245:(
3217:c
3213:t
3192:(
3147:c
3143:t
3128:(
3115:@
3100:c
3096:t
3079:(
3054:(
3037:(
3021:(
3001:(
2993:Y
2976:(
2959:(
2941:(
2924:(
2903:.
2880:(
2861:(
2838:(
2812:(
2790:(
2764:(
2744:(
2685:)
2677:(
2662:(
2634:(
2620::
2616:@
2599:(
2579:)
2571:(
2557:(
2534:(
2511:(
2489:(
2460:(
2441:(
2421:(
2408:,
2392:(
2376:(
2356:(
2332:(
2309:)
2266:)
2221:.
2101:)
2054:.
2035:)
2031:(
1934:(
1871:(
1770:(
1730:(
1713:(
1699:(
1677:(
1660:(
1636:(
1608:(
1593:.
1582::
1555:.
1544::
1517:)
1503:.
1478:.
1467::
1425:.
1414::
1387:)
1367:.
1305:(
1286:(
1271:(
1244:(
1217:(
1180:(
1160:(
1141:(
1124:(
1108:(
1092:(
1059:(
1033:(
1009:(
964:)
956:(
930:(
906:(
887:(
858:(
827:(
797:(
759:(
740:(
717:(
697:(
677:(
629:(
609:(
584:(
564:(
519:(
492:.
456:.
339:.
277:.
188:.
87::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.