252:
did address some sourcing issues, he has since retired from
Knowledge leaving other issues, particularly the broadness one, undone. Indeed, there might not be the necessary amount of available information about the village available: education, for example. The weather data for Lalitpur is simply not
221:
Un-referenced paragraphs have been cited now and some text deleted in the absence of a verifiable reference. I have removed an img and also checked and corrected the captions. I have added the weather data of
Laitpur town which is the closest to Deogarh as no seperate weather data is avaialble for
81:
It clearly fails the 3rd criteria, the article is nowhere "broad in coverage". The history section is not clear, it ends till the Gupta period which end in around sixth century AD, where is the rest of the history? The article also does not have other important details like climate etc which are
112:
There are a number of issues beyond those raised by
Royroydeb relating to the broadness criteriaâthe incomplete history details and the lack of many areas of coverage typical to a GA (which were alluded to in the original GA review, oddly enough). These additional issues include:
158:
I plan to allow the standard seven days for these issues to be addressed, though if work is in progress, since there is a lot to do, I will naturally extend the time.
66:
152:
I will address these issues and others mentioned above soon. I am unable to find the original file which had alll the references. I am now making a fresh search.
260:
on his talk page, who jointly expanded the article from a tiny stub with
Nvvchar, and his opinion is that the article is not at GA-quality at present. Also,
62:
253:
appropriate, being of another town 33 km away and at twice the elevation of
Deogarh, which can have a significant effect on temperature and precipitation.
105:
has not edited on
Knowledge for four months, this individual reassessment should continue because the article clearly needs significant work to meet the
47:
141:
the
Demographics section is out of dateâwhile the 2011 census is mentioned in the infobox, the actual text refers only to the 1991 and 2001 censuses
39:
123:
Not all of them. And the captions need to be checked: some spell names differently from the text, and some need to be reformatted. Thanks.
117:
image usage, which seems excessive generally, and at least three images are used more than once, which is clearly inappropriate
264:
Since there are a lot of issues remaining, including some prose ones, I am going to close this reassessment as "delisted".
178:
A few issues have been addressed but I will attend to other issues after I find my original file or by fresh google search.
55:
17:
32:
269:
205:
163:
128:
87:
224:
180:
265:
257:
218:
201:
175:
159:
124:
106:
273:
231:
209:
187:
167:
132:
102:
91:
83:
109:. I have checked, and no such work has been done since this was opened 15 months ago.
249:
197:
149:
several paragraphs are completely unsourced in the
Monuments section
262:
I think if there's still a lot of issues it would be best to delist.
200:. There's more to do with the images, which I've noted above.
74:
43:
8:
120:Images have been deleted now by Titodutta
144:It has now been updated with 2011 census
261:
7:
82:required for an article of a city.
24:
1:
274:21:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
196:Thanks for letting me know,
232:08:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
210:15:46, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
188:08:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
168:03:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
133:15:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
18:Talk:Deogarh, Uttar Pradesh
289:
92:07:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
248:Unfortunately, while
97:Resuming reassessment
244:Closing reassessment
222:the village. Pl see.
256:I consulted with
280:
227:
183:
79:
70:
51:
288:
287:
283:
282:
281:
279:
278:
277:
246:
225:
181:
99:
84:RRD13 āĻĻā§āĻŦāĻā§āĻ¯ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ
60:
37:
31:
29:
27:GA Reassessment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
286:
284:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
213:
212:
191:
190:
156:
155:
154:
153:
147:
146:
145:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
98:
95:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
285:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
251:
243:
233:
229:
228:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
192:
189:
185:
184:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
165:
161:
151:
150:
148:
143:
142:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
119:
118:
116:
115:
114:
110:
108:
104:
96:
94:
93:
89:
85:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
255:
247:
223:
179:
157:
111:
100:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
266:BlueMoonset
258:Dr. Blofeld
219:BlueMoonset
202:BlueMoonset
176:BlueMoonset
160:BlueMoonset
125:BlueMoonset
107:GA criteria
44:visual edit
103:Royrobdeb
101:Although
250:Nvvchar
226:Nvvchar
198:Nvvchar
182:Nvvchar
67:history
48:history
34:Article
76:Watch
16:<
270:talk
206:talk
164:talk
129:talk
88:talk
63:edit
40:edit
272:)
230:.
208:)
186:.
166:)
131:)
90:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
268:(
204:(
162:(
127:(
86:(
72:¡
69:)
61:(
53:¡
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.