349:"Dolby Digital Transform coding", "the digital transform theory", "digital transform matrix", and verb forms like in "IP and digital transform television", but nothing called a "digital transform". Or if you found it, show it to us. There's the mistitled patent "Device for computing a digital transform of a signal" that's all about computing discrete transforms. Many things are digital, but digital transform is not anything.
21:
205:
If you have to rely on the patent language "a first intermediate digital transform signal" and "a second intermediate digital transform signal", you're digging pretty deep. And they're still not "digital transforms". It has meaning only within the context of that particular patent; or perhaps not
615:
Given the discussions at the AfD and above, I still think a disamb page is better than a redirect. If someone looks up digital transform, they are likely confused on what they want to research. Therefore, it seems to me to be better to give them a list of options to choose from instead of assuming
311:
I still wonder why you think someone will be looking for "digital transform". Is there any reason to think that either a disambig or a redirect is useful? I've found that deleting redirects is nearly impossible, so I don't see this as progress unless you can find a good reason for it. Who would
348:
Yes, I think you invented it, from a random bigram. Your link shows "digital-transform spectroscopy", "Digital transform processing", "The
Digital Transform Machine", "Digital Transform Spectrometer", "digital transform mode", "Digital transform-based algorithms", "frequecy-digital transform",
445:
I hadn't noticed your "digital transformation" search link above. Same deal there. Two fairly generic terms, digital and transformation, sometimes used together in various contexts. No sign of a topic among things like "analog-to-digital tranformation", "the digital transformation in the
101:
230:
From the search links posted here, it does appear to be a term that is used in literature. The question is, what does it mean? I have no answer but it seems a bit premature for an editor to put up a page without having an a grasp of that himself; ususally we use
565:
And most sources that talk about such things don't mention "digital transform" at all. Besides being essentially generic and meaningless, it's also rather uncommon compared to "discrete transform", which is itself rare compared to "Fourier transform". See
83:
Digital transform is not sampling, not at all. It is a permutation of a sequence of samples that are already collected. Once the sampling is done, anything can be done to the samples themselves, the data, and a digital transform is one of those things.
485:
I tagged the two referred topics as dubious, because neither is likely to every be referred to as "digital transform". I'd remove these, but then we'd be left with an empty article. Better to just delete it, no?
396:
104:
didn't show it to be a commonly used term, or to have any defined meaning. There are lots of transforms, some digitally implemented, but no particular class that I can find called "digital transforms".
446:
z-domain", "digital transformation to the desired scale", "digital-to-digital transformation equations", "a digital transformation of messages", "typical digital transformation of the data", etc.
573:
570:
567:
331:
31:
638:, or if they were, what topic they might be looking for. There are no topics associated with this bigram in sources. As I said before, if I'm wrong, show us.
395:
Kvng, I am not offended nor agitated, even when I am treated as a good-faithed ignoramus (which I am in 99.99...% of the sum of human knowledge). And sometimes
275:, i.e., a page which leads to different topics. The term is clearly used very often and clearly in different senses, hence a 100% candidate for a DAB page.
206:
even there, since the terms only appear in the claims, the intro, and the brief description, without definition or clarification of what they signify.
529:
Why do they seem accurate to you. Did you look at the book search results, and try to find uses of these meanings? I looked, but I didn't find...
466:
I've proposed deletion, since it was de-prodded. Can anyone suggest a reason to not delete it, after seeing the discussion above?
592:
Given that someone decided we can't delete this article, the only remaining sensible choice is to put it back to the redirect to
547:
I'll repeat my earlier observation that none of the 3 linked articles contain the phrase "digital transform". I am dubious. --
257:
The words do appear together in sources, but look at what they say; none that I find indicate that there's a topic there.
27:
616:
which one they want. Although I agree they probably would want the one that the article currently redirects towards. -
49:
419:
It is true that redirects don't get deleted. It is also true that they don't really get in the way of anything. --
593:
290:
516:
596:, since that's presumably at least sort of related to what someone is supposed thinking of if they look up
600:. So I did that. And then it got reverted saying we need to talk about it more here. So here we go...
180:
128:
89:
20:
512:
235:
in that case. I've searched both articles that are linked here and neither contains an instance of
330:"? This is not our business to decide. Anyway, how do you think I came to this term? Do you think
643:
605:
580:
534:
491:
471:
451:
404:
386:
354:
339:
317:
302:
294:
280:
262:
211:
150:
110:
73:
59:
297:") there until experts figure out whether something sensible can be written about the subject.
171:
Right, but in arriving at FFT or discrete FT, an intermediate step is made, that step called
68:
In any case, feel free to give what you think "correct" definition of the quite common term.
505:
176:
124:
85:
364:
272:
232:
621:
552:
424:
372:
244:
639:
601:
576:
530:
487:
467:
447:
400:
382:
350:
335:
313:
298:
276:
258:
207:
146:
106:
69:
55:
327:
172:
617:
634:
Nobody has identified any reason to believe that anyone would be looking for
548:
420:
368:
240:
647:
625:
609:
584:
556:
538:
520:
495:
475:
455:
428:
408:
390:
376:
358:
343:
321:
306:
284:
266:
248:
215:
184:
154:
132:
114:
93:
77:
63:
289:
OK. Whatever meanings I had in mind, all of them seem to be related to
334:? Or am I an unworthy person for wikipedia to cater to my curiosity?
15:
501:
No. The meanings provided seem quite accurate and so the
381:
Of course I do. He invented it in good faith, I assume.
239:. That's not good form for a disambiguation page. --
8:
397:I am on the other side of the fence myself
312:ever by looking for "digital transform"?
145:Which are not called digital transforms.
575:for some relevant relative frequencies.
271:Why speaks about "topic"? I created a
123:I was thinking of Fourier transforms.
7:
293:. So I redirected this page (and "
30:on 22 January 2011. The result of
14:
19:
26:This article was nominated for
102:the term on google book search
1:
50:USer:Dicklyon must be kidding
648:18:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
626:17:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
610:05:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
585:07:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
557:16:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
539:17:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
521:12:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
496:07:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
476:07:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
456:03:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
429:22:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
409:01:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
391:00:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
377:22:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
359:22:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
344:21:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
322:20:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
307:17:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
285:17:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
267:15:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
249:14:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
216:23:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
185:14:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
155:05:55, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
133:05:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
115:05:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
94:03:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
78:02:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
64:01:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
666:
594:digital signal processing
326:Who would ever look for "
291:digital signal processing
511:tags should be removed.
273:disambiguation page
295:discrete transform
636:digital transform
598:digital transform
237:digital transform
173:digital transform
45:proposed deletion
42:
41:
657:
510:
504:
23:
16:
665:
664:
660:
659:
658:
656:
655:
654:
508:
502:
483:
464:
47:
12:
11:
5:
663:
661:
653:
652:
651:
650:
629:
628:
590:
589:
588:
587:
560:
559:
544:
543:
542:
541:
524:
523:
513:Colonel Warden
482:
479:
463:
460:
459:
458:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
393:
252:
251:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
157:
138:
137:
136:
135:
118:
117:
100:My perusal of
97:
96:
46:
43:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
662:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
632:
631:
630:
627:
623:
619:
614:
613:
612:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
586:
582:
578:
574:
571:
568:
564:
563:
562:
561:
558:
554:
550:
546:
545:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
526:
525:
522:
518:
514:
507:
500:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
480:
478:
477:
473:
469:
461:
457:
453:
449:
444:
443:
430:
426:
422:
418:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:I invented it
329:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
254:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
217:
213:
209:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
120:
119:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
98:
95:
91:
87:
82:
81:
80:
79:
75:
71:
66:
65:
61:
57:
53:
51:
44:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
635:
597:
591:
484:
465:
236:
67:
48:
35:
328:Phocodontia
177:Binksternet
125:Binksternet
86:Binksternet
462:Delete it?
640:Dicklyon
602:Dicklyon
577:Dicklyon
531:Dicklyon
488:Dicklyon
468:Dicklyon
448:Dicklyon
401:Lorem Ip
383:Dicklyon
351:Dicklyon
336:Lorem Ip
314:Dicklyon
299:Lorem Ip
277:Lorem Ip
259:Dicklyon
233:redlinks
208:Dicklyon
147:Dicklyon
107:Dicklyon
70:Lorem Ip
56:Lorem Ip
52:. Also
28:deletion
506:dubious
481:Dubious
363:Please
399:. :-)
365:WP:AGF
618:Atmoz
644:talk
622:talk
606:talk
581:talk
572:and
569:and
553:talk
549:Kvng
535:talk
517:talk
492:talk
472:talk
452:talk
425:talk
421:Kvng
405:talk
387:talk
373:talk
369:Kvng
355:talk
340:talk
318:talk
303:talk
281:talk
263:talk
245:talk
241:Kvng
212:talk
181:talk
151:talk
129:talk
111:talk
90:talk
74:talk
60:talk
36:keep
34:was
646:)
624:)
608:)
583:)
555:)
537:)
519:)
509:}}
503:{{
494:)
474:)
454:)
427:)
407:)
389:)
375:)
367:--
357:)
342:)
320:)
305:)
283:)
265:)
247:)
214:)
183:)
175:.
153:)
131:)
113:)
92:)
76:)
62:)
642:(
620:(
604:(
579:(
551:(
533:(
515:(
490:(
470:(
450:(
423:(
403:(
385:(
371:(
353:(
338:(
316:(
301:(
279:(
261:(
243:(
210:(
179:(
149:(
127:(
109:(
88:(
72:(
58:(
54:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
