Talk:Digital signage

1000:

case studies and analyzed the data to try to put together something truly informational and original. At the very least it does it's best to present a clear picture of what the true ROI is for a message center based on hard data instead of just coming up with numbers out of thin air. We have also put together a list of supporting docs, like the SBA report from 2000 with the "15-150% increase in business" claim that many put forward for ROI calculation, and even go so far as to put that in real context. The "Knife" article has a link to a blog that sells knives... And that was the first search I thought of. Frankly, companies that are in this industry are going to be the ones with the facts and figures. I'm not looking to put a giant banner with our company name in it, but I would like to make this a part of the current information on signage that's out there while still respecting community guidelines. Here is a link to our ROI whitepaper. Compare it with current reference #17. Thoughts?

2555:

estate agents), banks, transportation services, airports, entertainment venues, sporting stadia, cinemas, hair-salons and beauticians, sex shops, brothels, massage parlours, etc, etc etc? If everything is included, there is a real risk that the article will become impossibly long and tedious. If everything is not included, the article will probably be tagged as "unbalanced" or as it already is tagged "lacking a worldwide focus". The article already includes a section devoted to the general applications - why is it necessary to repeat these general applications with reference to specific industries? My feeling is that the article only needs to discuss specific industry applications if they are unique to a given industry and are not already canvassed in the general section - and a few salient examples may be all that is necessary.

1309:(a page with very little detail}, which is a concept and not a replacement term for 'digital signage'. I have cited almost all the sources of the things which are written, however I am aware that such a large amount of changes may upset people. Furthermore to this, I feel that the whole digital signage article is getting far too long, with too much irrelevant and unnecessary detail. Unless there is a significant objection, I intend to have a look at the Technology section and attempt to clairfy it. I would also like some help writing a a History section, which considering the age of digital signage, is very much needed. 74: 53: 262: 2532:- and this is arguably where the suggested content on industry size belongs. If you are going to discuss industry size, market worth etc - would this be global coverage? Is it even possible to source market value/size at a global level? If not, would the coverage be US-based or would it be necessary to provide information for every country - some 90 odd nations or just the English speaking nations? And, where would the data come from? 464: 1103:

Knowledge's general policy. Perhaps if the tone of the section was more neutral and didn't make it appear as though POPAI were somehow in charge of the digital signage industry? Possibly highlighting that the standards are new with an aim to unify the industry, but not yet actually in mainstream use? However, I am just one voice and I'm happy to leave it as is if the people here are in agreement with you. What do others think?

341: 22: 163: 1153:

Eg. That POPAI has released the first of a series of documents which aim to provide a standardisation within the industry. However, this standardisation is still new and not fully adopted (especially not globally). Knowledge is not a blog or a forum for new things, or regional things. I think we should just leave at saying there are efforts to standardise the industry and this is one of them.

142: 1685:

difference between www.screens.tv or www.digitalsignagetoday.com and www.seleniuminc.com or www.broadsign.com is that while the former might ultimately have a profit-making purpose, they also provide the visitor with a range of general information on the topic at hand, in this case digital signage. The latter examples, by contrast, exist primarily to promote

252: 231: 1126:(also voted #1 key factor to mold the industry in F&S's 2007 industry report). If anyone can suggest a toned-down wording to state the fact that POPAI has release the industry's first standard for the benefit of us all, please feel free to suggest. Removing it altogether is not the best way to carry forward this idea. -- 717:

your policy. Kick me and others off if we're breaking vows and shamelessly humping products. But as others have noted, there is way too much hype and blabber out there and a handful of bloggers are just trying to help weed out the crap and point to what's real and relevant. My two cents, in Canadian $ $ $ .

1283:

Having said that, I have for now removed the text from the article (while leaving the link) - it seems misleading to talk about what The Screen is doing and not mention what other organisations e.g. POPAI, various audience-research groups, etc. are working on - it gives the misleading impression that

1152:

I understand what you're saying and I can fully appreciate that POPAI is a significant organisation, arguably a significant organisation for digital signage (which, by the way, didn't exist in 1936). I believe my more recent edit reflects what we're both trying to say and still gets the point across.

772:

I think we need to revisit this discussion now that two blogs (DailyDOOH and mediadigitalsignage.com) have been added to the list. I'm not going to remove them as I am personally associated with aka.tv (removed a while back) and it could look like sour grapes - but we do need some consistency here...

716:

16:9 guy here ... I appreciate the many positive comments about my blog. I noticed the other day the traffic in from Knowledge had dried up and came here to learn my blog had been voted off the island. If the blog mentioned immediately above makes the cut and mine doesn't, I'm mightily confused about

682:

Lets look at the section "Suppliers", Pro AV has been referenced as an industry expert source, but its commercial, paid advertising. And someones added the small list of "top" suppliers, again from Pro AV. However, readers might want a broader spectrum of advice, not just from one commercial source

648:

I am seeing products that are offering content creation at a fraction of the cost and time using existing "projects" converted to proprietary formats. Unless you already have your own content creation projects, contracts, groups, is this not suggesting to pirate and use other people's work? Which I

2223:

One final words to DAJF: Please please don't let our personal arguments ends up in 'Removal Revenge'. If you really want to improve to the quality of the pages I am editing at the same time, I can apologise and settle old issues, and we can work together. Stop using 'follow Knowledge guidelines'

1934:

Legion - I tend to agree - the problem (historically) that we have had with this page is that there haven't been many reliable third-party sites other than news sites. That's probably down to digital signage being such a new (and of course relatively niche) phenomenon compared to the other media you

1905:

Hi Wayne, just to reply to what amounts to your central point - quite possibly my opinion is slanted by working for a company which has been linked from this article, likewise yours may be slanted by working for a company whose link has been repeatedly removed. Since we can't really remove this kind

914:

I can certainly see the case for removing ISMI as it's not specifically a digital-signage organisation. OVAB I believe should definitely stay - okay, advertising is just a subset of digital signage, but it's an important one, and the organisation is undeniably dedicated to this sector. As for POPAI,

782:

I have added in links to digitalsignagetoday.com and SCREENS.tv, neither of which is a blog or directly associated with any individual vendor. It seems absurd to be listing The Screen - a credible body but one that represents only the UK industry - as our only source of further info. For the record,

2554:

I cannot help wondering where the list of different industry applications might have a logical ending? Why not include: tourist destinations, visitor attractions, cultural arts attractions (museums, galleries, zoos), hospitals, professional service providers, property developers, realtors (Br: real

1791:

Very eloquently stated however; I will counter you opinion is slanted/skewed by your employment with a company who enjoys the benefit of linking to this wiki discription. Your statement that only a small fraction of visitors link into your website via this page is not of any concern. A fact is that

1371:

I too agree that the article is a bit of a mess. I did some work to get consistency in what the components are called, a 'media player' for instance for the playback component. I did delete one paragraph which seemed totally irrelevant (discussing the pricing factors for LCD displays). Clarified

894:

I'd like to propose a revision to the way links are added to "External Links": 1. Links should only go to a website's main page, not to a specific page (these should be saved for citing references if the page has anything to say). 2. Links should remain focussed to the digital signage industry as a

2558:

This is an encyclopedia article - it provides general information - and may point users to other more detailed information via high quality references, see also sections and external links. It is not appropriate to write an "all you ever needed to know about digital signage" in a single article or

1770:

To give another example of the distinction, if I were to insert a link to www.stjohnpatrick.com (the corporate site of the SCREENS.tv publishing company), it would be entirely appropriate for another editor to remove this, because the primary purpose of that site is to promote the business, rather

1338:

I've now edited the detail in the Content section. Mostly, it was removing or moving irrelevant information (such as detail about internet access or mobile phones) and adding some detail about what displays, playback/content management and networks actually mean when it comes to digital signage. I

1125:

Ok. What I meant was that POPAI is probably the industry's oldest organization (since 1936) with the largest potential customerbase (retail brands) which make the organization significant. The aim is not to promote POPAI, but make the industry aware of the progress in standardizing digital signage

1067:

A new section appeared in the article promoting the POPAI industry standards. I've read the 3 page PDF of these standards and I'm not partiularly impressed (mostly seems to added unnecessary jargon and terms in an attempt to "clarify the jargon" :/). Anyway, I've merged that cited section into the

712:

Hello - In order to be fair there simply must be NO links to company blogs here. To pretend that these blogs are not marketing arms of the associated companies is a joke. Rather than get into fights about who or what is independent, why not just make a blanket rule that only genuniley independent

1083:

POPAI is a legendary organization in the retail industry (active members include McDonald's, PEPSI, Coca Cola, P&G, etc., the LARGEST buyer list of digital signage!!). If POPAI establishes anything, there is no reason why it is not a significant reference. They have REAL customers. We need to

999:

With regards to no links to company blogs: Our company has recently redone our website, and we have done a lot of research into EMC's, ROI, etc... We have even created a Javascript ROI calculator. Much of this, I believe, is information that the industry is sorely lacking. We have collected 20-30

730:

I see we were taken off the nice list. We feel our open discussions are a great resource to the industry for newcomers and end-users. We do not allow a free for all advertising in our threads and our forum is heavily monitored as such. That being said, the cost of running our forum, (most months)

675:

Lets ask ourselves Who is this page for? Well, its for people interested in digital signage, right? Those people want to know the facts, not marketing propaganda, but the facts often come from industry experts, but then citations must not be specific to any particular product or commercial body.

1707:

OK - Point taken I will agree to disagree. You have a valid point however consultants and industry assocations walk a very fine line when they start taking monies in advertisement dollars and selling information. Saint John Patrick Publishers profits by selling information on the Digital Signage

1216:

The Screen Association has sought to address some of the most pressing issues for the advertising market by releasing a white paper on audience measurement and a directory of UK based ad-networks. For the broader digital signage market the Screen Association has also issued an Industry Directory

1102:

Loaded phrases like "legendary organization" are not needed here to promote POPAI. My point was that it's not the only organization doing what they do and their standards are not yet adopted. As such, putting them on this article prematurely (and as a promotional piece) is not in accordance with

1057:

I think the section on POPAI needs more citing/linking. I've tried to find out more about this alleged list of recommendations but even the POPAI digital site seems to have nothing on it. What's more, its directory doesn't list any of the five digital signage companies I've seen presenting their

1181:

Actually, on a further re-reading, why does this require a new section called "Standards"? Can it not go into point 2. of the progress in "Issues and Progress"? As I said above, these standards are not yet adopted (no matter how important POPAI is), so they aren't 'Standards' yet. They're just

1684:

and past discussions on this Talk page. The Knowledge policy is not against linking to sites that are run by profit-making organisations (which would rule out huge numbers of eminently reliable sources), but against linking to "Web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services". The

1277:

Thanks for bringing this up, Rhi - you reminded me that I've been meaning to fix it for a while. The organisation referred to is The Screen, which is the correct name of the association running the Website to which we link. It is, as far as I know, nothing to do with the other association you

1052:

The large number of terms that have emerged to describe the nascent industry led Point of Purchase Advertising International (POPAI) to form a digital signage standards group in 2005. This group is currently tasked with assembling a list of standard terminology for describing digital signage

1853:

Firstly, I disagree that this article has been "hijacked by SCREENS.tv". Many contribute here and everyone is free to do so. I would say though, that there are quite a lot of news links on the article (even after you removed aka.tv and SCREENS.tv). Compared to other media industry articles,

697:

The article refers to "The recent introduction of free digital signage software". This is a reference without a source. As I am very interested in this free software, I would like someone to (perhaps) begin a list of Digital Signage Software? I know some proprietary ones, but no free ones.

866:

The DailyDOOH is a blog, not a news source. It's biased, poorly informed and very opinionated (serving to spark argument and increase its own web traffic). I'd like to see if anyone wishes to defend its place here on Knowledge as a valid news source? I propose the link is removed.

1266:

seems to be duplicitious (the lesser known digital signage group are trading on the name of the more prominent group), fradulent (the white paper isn't linked and doesn't appear to exist) and promotional (advertising digital signage suppliers rather than providing content).

2463:

Hey everyone, this page is a little outdated. I propose we all work together to add different citations that are actually credible and not commercialized links. I propose the following change, anyone is free to edit my changes if they feel like it does not fit the purpose.

898:

Based on those two points, I would like to remove In-store Marketing Institute, OVAB, OVAB Europe and POPAI from the External links. The alternative would be to add more links which balance the other market sectors, but I believe that would just make the situation worse.

2398:

Hi I see you have a Dead links "POPAI Digital Signage Content Standards"and you use web Archieve link. I have site that provide your more information regarding Digital Signage . Please check this url and they have also PDF file so reader loves to read more information.

1983:

In regards to the content of this artile my site is more relevant than the other external links, should I put it onto the External Links section? My site is www.allsee-tech.com Is has multiple signage solutions and there are no prices as it is not a retail site.

1531:(which has it's own article). If anyone has a good reason why "Digital signage broadcasting" should be seen in it's own light (whatever that is), then please go ahead and either discuss it here, or rewrite the article with references, explainations and detail. 1494:(DS), and that both articles would benefit being merged together. The DSB article is fairly over-technical, with a degree of unsubstantiated claims. But the information it gets to might be of more interest on the DS page. What do other people think? 515:

The Knowledge page for Digital Signage had become an advertisement for the few companies that have a Knowledge page. Please add MORE links to the external links of media, events and companies that provide Digital Signage, Kiosks and Menu Boards.

851:

Personally, I don't see anything wrong with having aka.tv listed there. It's a useful source of information. However, there are a lot of other useful sources of information. So perhaps a directory page of digital signage news pages would be the

1289:

So - I'll try to do it, but if anyone has the time and inclination to add some information on other groups which are working on standards, measurement etc. that would be great, and The Screen could then take its rightful place among them.

2637:, "Research and Markets: Global Digital Signage Market - Forecasts and Trends Report 2015-2020," but elsewhere in the article, we see "China currently leads the world in the number of digital sign displays deployed and number of 983:

Hi Noventri, I'm sure you're right and that there's a better (non-vendor) source out there for the assertion about free software widening the market. Please keep your eyes open and let us know if you spot one - I'll do the same.

1915:

Just for the record, however: I am not employed either explicitly or implicitly to promote the site on Knowledge. Editing this article (and dozens of others, some related to the topic and most not) is something I do on my own

2175:- Due to the sales volume, drop in prices, advent of network and computational powers, digital signage industry has evolved rapidly in the last few years. However, none of the latest development is updated in this article. 761:

the links except that to The Screen. At the very least, I can't see much logic to allowing The Screen and excluding the CDSA - but can we have views from other editors before embarking on an endless cycle of reversions?

2517:

Citations: As far as citations are concerned, any editor is ablre to remove citations that are spam. A better option, however, would simply be to replace spam references with superior references from books or journal

1809:

This is not a mystery to any person with a background in SEO promotion. This greatly effects the promotion of your group of websites which in turn allows you to enjoy the spoils gained by attracting advertising.

1762:

The issue here is not whether a linked Website is a profit-making organisation. There is no policy or presumption that Knowledge only links to nonprofits. The issue is whether the purpose of a linked site is

1565:

page, so please discuss it there. However, my question for this talk page is: should we use "adfotainment" on the digital signage article when it is (at best) a niche term only used by a handful of people? -

967:

Is the 12th reference link to oxygennext.com really necessary? Why link to that particular company's site (to the main page of it, no less) when there are several providers of free digital signage out there?

731:

outweighs incoming revenue and we try and keep it as educational as possible. I really do not understand why it would be banned from this list as a resource?? - LisaJ here from the Digital Signage Forum.

429: 213: 950:

a bit on the issue of repeated linkspam additions to this page - it may be a useful read to anyone considering adding a commercial link, or an interesting one to anyone who's been removing them.

2663:

Report is more authoritative that Joe Mandeses's media blog. Obviously both China and the US cannot dominate the market at the same time. We might also consider what metrics are being used for

2594:

Title is of source is incorrect (not even grammatically correct). The prose is misleading since the companies named in this directory are U.S. companies - the mention of worldwide is fallacious

1819:

I see that St John's Publishing also produces a bi-monthy "Internet Retailing: Bi-Monthly Magazine" seems odd that your enterprise would be industry experts in this but not employ SEO tactics.

2799: 203: 2700: 596:

Anybody here think it's funny that the statement that Digital Signage can provide higher ROI is supported by a vendor-sponsored "ROI" calculator that seems to throw numbers out of thin air?

1305:

I have edited a large amount of the Content section. It was getting far too confusing and missing the point of what 'content' on 'digital signage' actually is. It was full of references to

2630:

4. "Presently, North America dominates the digital signage market and will be expected to continue dominating the market until 2020, with the US occupying a majority of the market share.

679:

Is it reasonable to add links to industry publications? Yes, I think that´s useful to readers. And to commercial supplier? Yes, a list in alphabetical order would be useful to readers.

2804: 2794: 1581:

Yes, I think it's an imaginary word - I've certainly never seen or heard it except on this page (and I've worked in the digital signage sector for five years). See also my comments on

2761:

Did this page perhaps previously mention those things, but somehow that text was lost? Or should those redirects point to some other Knowledge article, and if so, what article(s)? --

2288: 1084:

make people aware what the real drivers to the industry is (definitely not any supplier or commentator, but real buyers), and understand the full depth and impact that is coming. --

179: 1513:, not uninteresting but not appropriate here. Besides, "digital signage broadcasting" is not a common phrase and the article is an orphan, so as it stands it's probably wasted. 924:

As I think I've suggested on this page before, there's something of a paucity of really good published information on digital signage (and unfortunately one of the best sites -

1599:

I have removed "adfotainment" and reintroduced the term "DOOH" (with reference to a conference about DOOH). Also, it may interest people to read this article from DailyDOOH -

1825:

I strongly suggest for the interest of "keeping it real.." I challenge you to keep your links to SCREENS.tv site/blog off of here and no one will question your intentions.

2615:

3. "Restaurants are able to use digital signage both indoors and outdoors, with the latter needing a form of weather protection depending on the components of the hardware

1561:

Does anyone else think that "adfotainment" is a made up term and one which should perhaps be left out of an article on Digital signage? I have posted my views on the

1527:

I have merged the article in. When I actually took the time to read the (mostly nonsensical) article, I found it was full of rehtoric, POV and duplication, mostly on

1353:

I've just put in a whole load of tags as well as making other general edits. It would certainly improve the article a lot if we could deal with the citations issue.

640:

What is ROI? If an abbreviation is used it should be preceded by an un-abbreviated version with the acronym in brackets for future use. Could there be a link to ROI?

170: 147: 2789: 124: 114: 2340: 2336: 2322: 1816:

I do know that this is a valuable asset to your company even if you are unaware of this fact I would place my bets on the fact someone in your organization does.

1753:

information on the digital-signage industry, and selling advertising alongside that. The difference is significant when we are discussing linking from Knowledge!

1831:

Create a section on Industry Related Publications, E-ZINES and open it up to everyone in the trade producing a magazine relating to digital signage industry.

2217:

If you look closely, it is the other way around. We can see that it is more likely that Securicomllc copied directly from the old version of the wiki page.

2784: 2037: 2644:. Another source for information on digital sign displays and impressions (the number of times a viewer reads/views digital sign), is a report provided by 2482:

Use of digital signage (In different markets, in different environment, for different uses, and how they are compatible) (Who use them, and how they use it)

1925:

The concept of a Publications links section I can surely live with, but is it really that different from what we have today - do we need a new heading?

683:

like Pro AV, and other manufacturers of DS systems should be listed so readers can search through the available systems to find what suits them best.

90: 2289:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110312055924/http://popai.com:80/membership-community/communities/digital-signage/digital-signage-content-standards/

1822:

Another fact of some note is if it truely of no value -- why are you doing updates and checking the page daily during the course of your workday?

2405: 2604: 2814: 2486:

Those are my proposed changes for now. Please feel free to comment if there is any suggestions. Let's all work together to improve this page.

2149:

in the lead para. While they obviously play an important part in digital signage, the reality is that a very large number of installations are

1392:

Would anyone object to me removing conversation threads which are older than 2007? This talk page seems a bit cluttered with old conversations.

318: 308: 1957:

What about digital billboards? It seems they should fall under the category of "digital signage", but they are not mentioned in the article.

1708:

industry correct? Who is Saint John Patrick Publishers? Are you employed or enjoy financial benefits through Saint John Patrick Publishers?

2551:

are actually different facets of the same thing - hospitality includes restaurants as well as hotel accommodation, cafes, hotels and bars.

649:

am sure is the same thing as copy a Rembrant and passing it off as your own, especially in a wide open advertising digital signage scheme?

2693: 1324:

I agree the article is a bit of a mess and waffly in parts. I don't think it's too long overall, though - probably about the right length.

699: 656: 603: 81: 58: 819:

digitalsignagetoday.com seems to primarily an advertising website and not an industry expert or particularly suited for external linking.

2819: 2809: 1838: 1665: 915:

well, that could go for the same reasons as ISMI, or perhaps more constructively we could change the link so it points to POPAIdigital (

625: 2292: 2077:

Why is there an attack on open-source solutions in the content section? Why was open-source solutions removed without a justification?

1887:. If we are going to remove one news link, shouldn't we then remove them all? And if we don't, how do you decide which ones to keep? - 928:- fails Knowledge's link policy on multiple grounds), so we don't have the luxury of rejecting links for falling a bit short of ideal. 713:

blogs are listed. I am MD of Ryarc Media Systems, a software company who's blog is not listed here. Thoughts? --Fergal O' Ceallaigh.

2063:

Since there was a glaring lack of references to OSS. I added one, but did not want to add more as this seem to be the incorrect way.

721:

Views on the deletion/reinstatement of the links to the Digital Signage Forum, Self-Service World and Digital Signage Today, please?

2501: 2240: 1964: 1068:"Issues and Progress" section, where it makes more sense. I also kept/added the link to the POPAI article (which is pretty dismal). 1007: 566: 2620: 2758:

guideline, I feel that either this page should at least mention these terms, but currently this page never mentions any of them.

2000: 284: 2276: 521: 387: 2428: 2181:- Most of the text is suspected to have copied from another website. Plus, it is really low quality. Need a major revamp. 1875:

If I may quote Knowledge guidelines: "Knowledge articles are not mere collections of external links or Internet directories"

1803: 1724: 1422: 480: 393: 2218: 2212: 1646:

Why would you have an advertising department if you are not profiting by "hijacking" the Digital Signage wiki description.

1552:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1759:

Yes, this is neither a secret nor particularly relevant - either the link is a worthwhile one for Knowledge, or it isn't.

2731: 2708: 2383: 1487: 353: 33: 2607:: Dunkin' Donuts serves up digital menu boards|date=2014-02-20|work=www.digitalsignagetoday.com|access-date=2017-08-22 2521:

Re-organisation: I have no idea what is meant by "improvement to old sections" - could this be a little more specific?

2193:- Promoting certain technologies which are not important for the current and future of the digital signage industry. 1906:

of bias, probably the best thing is to let other editors determine the fate of both the SCREENS.tv and Selenium links?

1631:

Stating no commercial links in wiki is one thing however just because you are blogging does not make you "non-profit"

275: 236: 2146: 1813:

Still not convinced google "Digital Signage" see where the link to this page ranks. In many cases number 1 position.

925: 89:-related subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 2400: 2582: 1510: 2741: 2726: 2535:(b) The use of different digital signage in different industries needs a reconceptualisation. One sub-section is 2448: 833:

There's actually quite a bit of content there, updated most days. Personally I don't think it falls afoul of the

2339:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

517: 492: 2578:

1. "There are currently over 200 different companies worldwide that are marketing digital signage solutions."

834: 798: 660: 2626:

Saks 5th Avenue is a department store - it is unclear how this article provides any insights about restaurants

2406:

http://mediaroom.eyefactive.com/whitepaper/en/whitepaper-what-is-interactive-digital-signage-by-eyefactive.pdf

703: 607: 21: 2605:

https://www.digitalsignagetoday.com/articles/dse14-dunkin-donuts-serves-up-digital-menu-boards/%7Ctitle=DSE14

2187:- Not balanced. Does not give an clear overview of the digital signage industry, its uses and its futures. 1628:

RE: Barnabypage - Statements and Uber enforcement tactics to keep Digital Signage an extension of SCREENS.tv

629: 2736: 2704: 2641: 2374: 2268: 1842: 1669: 400: 73: 52: 1968: 1011: 824: 688: 2497: 2479:

Industry (Size of market, potential growth, worth of market, usage of digital signage on a global scale)

2358:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2346: 2236: 2201: 2158: 1940: 1776: 1694: 1590: 1518: 1412: 1358: 1329: 1268: 1059: 989: 973: 955: 933: 842: 810: 788: 562: 414: 280: 39: 2267:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1582: 1562: 1033: 1339:

would like next to approach the Issues and progress section, and try to cite some of the claims made.

1053:

technology and business models. It is expected to release a final list of its recommendations in 2006.

969: 2489: 2444: 2416: 2313: 2228: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1960: 1834: 1747:

Saint John Patrick Publishers profits by selling information on the Digital Signage industry correct?

1712: 1661: 1003: 652: 621: 599: 554: 2293:

http://popai.com/membership-community/communities/digital-signage/digital-signage-content-standards/

837:

proscription of "objectionable amounts of advertising", though obviously that's a subjective issue.

2766: 2675: 2564: 2420: 2078: 2064: 1892: 1716: 1608: 1571: 1536: 1499: 1472: 1429: 1397: 1377: 1344: 1314: 1187: 1158: 1108: 1073: 904: 872: 857: 359: 283:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

178:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2471:

Reorganization of all sections (New sections to add and improvement to be made on older sections)

2424: 2082: 2068: 1880: 1720: 1237:

the trade body that represents UK service companies to the film and television screen industries.

1127: 1085: 498: 376: 2621:

http://footwearnews.com/2017/fn-spy/red-carpet/emoji-shoes-flip-flops-slides-emoji-movie-394730/

2343:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2359: 2153:

2101: 2021: 1876: 1373: 820: 802: 684: 540: 410: 366: 267: 2277:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081218232313/http://www.iseurope.org:80/kcms/home.php?site=dooh

2493: 2232: 2197: 2154: 2131: 2049: 1936: 1772: 1690: 1643:

Saint John Patrick Publishers Ltd. 6 Laurence Pountney Hill London EC4R OBL United Kingdom

1586: 1514: 1408: 1354: 1325: 1291: 1182:'proposed standards'. Would moving it to the "Issues and Progress" section be acceptable? -- 1131: 1089: 985: 951: 929: 895:

whole and not just to advertising or retail. Digital signage is NOT just for these markets.

838: 806: 784: 774: 763: 739: 722: 582: 558: 494: 463: 2366: 1509:

I agree 100%, with the proviso that - as you say - there's a lot of speculation and POV on

2748: 2645: 2260: 2115: 1855: 1804:

http://www.thegooglecache.com/white-hat-seo/966-of-wikipedia-pages-rank-in-googles-top-10/

1491: 735: 372: 2689:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

2653: 2219:

https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.corex.co.za/corex/solution/digital-signage.html

2213:

https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.corex.co.za/corex/solution/digital-signage.html

2762: 2671: 2634: 2560: 2325:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2013: 1888: 1884: 1681: 1604: 1567: 1532: 1495: 1468: 1425: 1393: 1340: 1310: 1183: 1154: 1104: 1069: 947: 900: 868: 853: 340: 86: 2365:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2778: 2211:

DAJF has wrongly accused 'Copy and Paste' sections of Digital Signage wiki page from

2111: 2097: 2093: 2017: 1757:

Are you employed or enjoy financial benefits through Saint John Patrick Publishers?

1306: 536: 532: 2468:

Citations (Remove all citations that are related to commercialization of products)

2280: 926:

http://www.wirespring.com/dynamic_digital_signage_and_interactive_kiosks_journal/

2755: 2401:

http://www.eyefactive.com/en/blog/what-is-interactive-digital-signage-whitepaper

2332: 2127: 2045: 1867: 1859: 578: 2583:

http://buyersguide.designretailonline.com/category/digital-signage%7Ctitle=List

1767:, which unfortunately is true of www.seleniuminc.com and not of www.SCREENS.tv. 2667:- is it the number of displays, the area covered or the number of impressions? 2331:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1858:

has news links on it, of which similar kinds are unfound on other pages. See:

738:'s comments back in June, I think the Forum is a good contender for the list. 406: 380: 257: 2543:

of which malls are but just one example. Two other subsections are labelled

175: 162: 141: 1249:

an independent UK based trade association for the digital signage industry.

496: 2587:

Digital Signage Companies and Vendors in the design: retail Buyers' Guide

2440: 1600: 2770: 2712: 2679: 2568: 2505: 2452: 2432: 2388: 2244: 2205: 2162: 2135: 2105: 2086: 2072: 2053: 2025: 2004: 1972: 1944: 1896: 1846: 1780: 1728: 1698: 1673: 1612: 1594: 1575: 1540: 1522: 1503: 1476: 1433: 1416: 1401: 1381: 1362: 1348: 1333: 1318: 1294: 1271: 1191: 1162: 1135: 1112: 1093: 1077: 1062: 1015: 993: 977: 959: 937: 908: 876: 861: 846: 828: 814: 792: 777: 766: 742: 725: 707: 692: 664: 633: 611: 586: 570: 544: 525: 1879:, "Links in the 'External links' section should be kept to a minimum." 1284:

The Screen is the only one active in this kind of 'thought leadership'.

1240: 916: 2638: 2539:

but it seems to me that this should be covered in a broader category

2410:

If you love this information you can add this site url on your page.

1792:

by linking into this page you increase you goolge PR (page ranking).

1637:"..contact us, please email the editorial or advertising department. 805:

to clarify what they consider 'shady' about digitalsignagetoday.com!

1034:

http://holidaysigns.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ABCsOfEMCs.pdf

535:, we should not have a list of external links to companies here. - 2443:", so any links to their website would be considered as spam. . . 2044:? Seems like a company is pushing it's invested technology stack. 2041: 1863: 801:

I am asking other editors to consider adding www.screens.tv - and

2600:

2. "Predominant market users of digital signage are restaurants"

1247:, which is what the link actually leads to, represents itself as 1217:

which is intended as a proposed roadmap for industry development.

2685:

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

2119: 1528: 2619:" Emojis Get a High-Fashion Makeover at Saks Fifth Avenue, url= 2611:

Dunkin Donuts has now become typical of restaurants generally?

1883:, "It is not a newspaper or a collection of source documents" 1799: 1795:

Here is some reading on this subject for those dropping in...

499: 457: 251: 230: 15: 1689:

rather than to give broad-based general info on the subject.

2298:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2040:

is an important standard here for digital signage, say over

1226: 550:

Yes, agreed. Need to remove all commercial related links.

2123: 577:

The DMOZ link is a bit useless. Is that site still active?

2271:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2559:

turn it into some kind of dissertation on the subject.

1743:

Hi again. Let me answer your questions before commenting:

1048:

I'm not sure that the paragraph below is at all helpful:

797:

Okay - I see these have been reverted - so in line with

2264: 2654:

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/125922/

2122:

and it's currently used on the streets of London via

1421:

Archive of posts from 2006 or before can be found at

2635:

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151014006405

2439:

Eyefactive is a commercial company selling "digital

1456:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

279:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 174:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2800:

Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles

2335:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2012:No, you should not add your site to Knowledge. See 1652:Just a question to your readers of your SCREENS.tv 1058:products. HOw unbiased is POPAI and how useful? -- 188:Knowledge:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising 2805:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles 2795:Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles 1771:than to provide information on digital signage. 191:Template:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising 2281:http://www.iseurope.org/kcms/home.php?site=DOOH 1490:(DSB) has some duplication of information from 2699:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 2321:This message was posted before February 2018. 799:Knowledge:External_links#What_should_be_linked 618:yea, kinda. oh wait do you mean funny haahaa 531:On the contrary, please do not add links. Per 1459:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 8: 2648:, the "4th Screen Network Audience Report". 2038:Synchronized_Multimedia_Integration_Language 1251:Both sites are members only, neither has an 2145:I'm not sure about the prominence given to 19: 2528:(a) There is already a section devoted to 2487: 2414: 1212:confusing. The article contains the text: 348:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 326: 225: 136: 47: 2259:I have just modified 2 external links on 1765:primarily...to sell products or services 2652:Joe Mandese, MediaPost News,April 13, 1026: 227: 171:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising 138: 49: 2790:Mid-importance Graphic design articles 1655:Wayne Frisch, VP Software Development 1601:http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/9563 2659:I think we need to decide whther the 2310:to let others know (documentation at 757:I see that an editor has now removed 7: 2224:as your excuse (and personal use). 1800:http://en.wikipedia.org/Page_ranking 1749:Incorrect. SJP profits by providing 1450:The following discussion is closed. 1372:some of the networking section too. 1241:http://www.ukscreenassociation.co.uk 917:http://www.popai.co.uk/popaidigital/ 644:Intellectual Property and copyrights 273:This article is within the scope of 194:Marketing & Advertising articles 168:This article is within the scope of 99:Knowledge:WikiProject Graphic design 79:This article is within the scope of 2785:Start-Class Graphic design articles 102:Template:WikiProject Graphic design 38:It is of interest to the following 2574:Detailed response about references 2092:I removed it because there was no 14: 2263:. Please take a moment to review 1262:Accordingly the paragraph on the 783:I am associated with SCREENS.tv. 2185:Over focussed on certain aspects 1548:The discussion above is closed. 1259:which list fee-paying members. 462: 339: 260: 250: 229: 161: 140: 72: 51: 20: 2694:Digital signage Emoji Movie.jpg 2147:Environmental Graphic Designers 2141:Environmental Graphic Designers 313:This article has been rated as 208:This article has been rated as 119:This article has been rated as 2680:09:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 2569:08:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 2394:Suggestion For your Dead Links 2163:12:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 1423:Talk:Digital signage/Archive 1 394:Content (media and publishing) 1: 2815:Low-importance Media articles 2389:03:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC) 2206:05:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 2120:http://neon.webconverger.com/ 2106:22:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 2087:22:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 2054:03:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 1407:Yes, please do archive them. 1382:00:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC) 693:09:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 587:03:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 571:12:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 545:05:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC) 533:the external links guidelines 526:21:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC) 330:WikiProject Media To-do List: 287:and see a list of open tasks. 182:and see a list of open tasks. 93:and see a list of open tasks. 2771:00:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC) 2732:Digital Signage Broadcasting 2245:04:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC) 2136:10:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 2026:20:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 2005:17:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC) 1973:02:23, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 1649:It reeks of self promotion. 1511:Digital signage broadcasting 1488:Digital Signage Broadcasting 1221:There is also a link marked 847:17:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 829:16:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 815:14:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 793:15:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 747:Thank you Barbabypage - Lisa 612:04:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2506:06:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC) 2096:to establish importance. - 778:12:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 708:09:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 293:Knowledge:WikiProject Media 185:Marketing & Advertising 148:Marketing & Advertising 2836: 2820:WikiProject Media articles 2810:Start-Class Media articles 2352:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2256:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1613:14:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 1595:16:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1576:16:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1541:14:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1523:15:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 1504:14:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 1477:14:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1434:13:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1417:11:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1402:09:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1363:17:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 1349:17:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 1334:11:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 1319:14:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 1192:14:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1163:13:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1136:02:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1113:03:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 1094:04:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1078:11:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 994:17:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC) 978:12:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 938:14:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 909:11:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC) 862:14:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 726:13:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC) 319:project's importance scale 296:Template:WikiProject Media 125:project's importance scale 82:WikiProject Graphic design 2742:Signage Network Operators 2727:pervasive display systems 2713:17:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 2453:09:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC) 2433:09:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC) 2073:03:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 1467:into Digital signage. -- 1227:http://www.thescreen.org/ 1223:The Screen Association UK 1204:Which Screen Association? 634:11:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 325: 312: 245: 207: 156: 118: 67: 46: 2168:Major revisions required 2124:http://renewsolution.com 1945:16:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 1897:12:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 1847:03:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 1781:11:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC) 1729:14:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC) 1699:10:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC) 1674:22:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC) 1550:Please do not modify it. 1453:Please do not modify it. 1295:16:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 1272:16:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 1063:16:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 960:17:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC) 835:Knowledge:External links 767:13:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 743:13:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 665:11:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 2737:dynamic digital signage 2252:External links modified 2191:Commercially Motivated[ 1979:Relevant External Links 1634:As your website states 1624:hijacked by SCREENS.tv? 1016:16:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC) 877:11:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 105:Graphic design articles 1658:Selenium Interactive 1235:as I understand it is 1210:The Screen Association 1208:I find the mention of 28:This article is rated 2747:all redirect to this 2059:Open Source Solutions 1680:Hi Wayne, please see 1233:UK Screen Association 518:Itsallaboutsatellites 430:requests for comments 415:Alternative newspaper 2474:New Sections to add: 2333:regular verification 2094:third party sourcing 2754:To comply with the 2323:After February 2018 2302:parameter below to 1687:particular products 1640:We are located at: 1257:members directories 2705:Community Tech bot 2377:InternetArchiveBot 2328:InternetArchiveBot 1953:Digital billboards 1264:Screen Association 1253:industry directory 377:Video game culture 34:content assessment 2665:market domination 2530:industry overview 2508: 2492:comment added by 2435: 2419:comment added by 2353: 2248: 2231:comment added by 2036:I'm not sure why 2008: 1991:comment added by 1963:comment added by 1837:comment added by 1732: 1715:comment added by 1664:comment added by 1583:Talk:adfotainment 1563:Talk:adfotainment 1006:comment added by 655:comment added by 624:comment added by 602:comment added by 574: 557:comment added by 505: 504: 486: 485: 456: 455: 452: 451: 448: 447: 444: 443: 440: 439: 411:Alternative media 276:WikiProject Media 268:Journalism portal 224: 223: 220: 219: 135: 134: 131: 130: 2827: 2413:Regards Audwin 2387: 2378: 2351: 2350: 2329: 2317: 2247: 2225: 2007: 1985: 1975: 1849: 1731: 1709: 1676: 1455: 1036: 1031: 1018: 667: 636: 614: 573: 551: 500: 477: 476: 466: 458: 354:Article requests 343: 336: 335: 327: 301: 300: 297: 294: 291: 270: 265: 264: 263: 254: 247: 246: 241: 233: 226: 214:importance scale 196: 195: 192: 189: 186: 165: 158: 157: 152: 144: 137: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2835: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2775: 2774: 2749:digital signage 2720: 2701:nomination page 2687: 2576: 2514: 2461: 2445:Mean as custard 2396: 2381: 2376: 2344: 2337:have permission 2327: 2311: 2269:this simple FaQ 2261:Digital signage 2254: 2226: 2221: 2170: 2143: 2116:digital signage 2061: 2034: 1986: 1981: 1958: 1955: 1856:Digital Signage 1832: 1710: 1659: 1626: 1559: 1554: 1553: 1492:Digital signage 1484: 1463:The result was 1451: 1444: 1442:Merger proposal 1390: 1303: 1225:which links to 1206: 1046: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1032: 1028: 1001: 673: 650: 646: 619: 597: 594: 552: 513: 501: 495: 471: 436: 373:Media influence 298: 295: 292: 289: 288: 266: 261: 259: 239: 193: 190: 187: 184: 183: 150: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2833: 2831: 2823: 2822: 2817: 2812: 2807: 2802: 2797: 2792: 2787: 2777: 2776: 2745: 2744: 2739: 2734: 2729: 2719: 2716: 2697: 2696: 2686: 2683: 2669: 2668: 2628: 2627: 2613: 2612: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2575: 2572: 2537:shopping malls 2526: 2525: 2522: 2519: 2513: 2510: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2460: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2395: 2392: 2371: 2370: 2363: 2296: 2295: 2287:Added archive 2284: 2283: 2275:Added archive 2253: 2250: 2216: 2210: 2196: 2169: 2166: 2142: 2139: 2109: 2108: 2060: 2057: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2028: 1980: 1977: 1954: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1900: 1899: 1872: 1871: 1808: 1790: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1768: 1760: 1754: 1744: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1702: 1701: 1688: 1625: 1622: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1558: 1555: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1286: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1255:but both have 1205: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1097: 1096: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1025: 1024: 1020: 997: 996: 965: 964: 963: 962: 941: 940: 921: 920: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 760: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 700:212.104.204.79 672: 669: 657:198.103.152.52 645: 642: 638: 637: 604:173.179.221.22 593: 590: 548: 547: 512: 509: 507: 503: 502: 497: 493: 491: 488: 487: 484: 483: 473: 472: 467: 461: 454: 453: 450: 449: 446: 445: 442: 441: 438: 437: 435: 434: 433: 432: 425: 417: 396: 383: 362: 347: 345: 344: 332: 331: 323: 322: 315:Low-importance 311: 305: 304: 302: 299:Media articles 285:the discussion 272: 271: 255: 243: 242: 240:Low‑importance 234: 222: 221: 218: 217: 210:Mid-importance 206: 200: 199: 197: 180:the discussion 166: 154: 153: 151:Mid‑importance 145: 133: 132: 129: 128: 121:Mid-importance 117: 111: 110: 108: 96:Graphic design 91:the discussion 87:graphic design 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 59:Graphic design 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2832: 2821: 2818: 2816: 2813: 2811: 2808: 2806: 2803: 2801: 2798: 2796: 2793: 2791: 2788: 2786: 2783: 2782: 2780: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2759: 2757: 2752: 2750: 2743: 2740: 2738: 2735: 2733: 2730: 2728: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2717: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2695: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2684: 2682: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2666: 2662: 2661:Global Trends 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2618: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2606: 2603: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2581: 2573: 2571: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2556: 2552: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2531: 2524:New sections: 2523: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2511: 2509: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2481: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2459:Update Needed 2458: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2411: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2402: 2393: 2391: 2390: 2385: 2380: 2379: 2368: 2364: 2361: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2348: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2324: 2319: 2315: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2257: 2251: 2249: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2220: 2215: 2214: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2192: 2188: 2186: 2182: 2180: 2176: 2174: 2167: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2140: 2138: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2058: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1978: 1976: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1952: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1839:70.72.222.252 1836: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1811: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1793: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1769: 1766: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1666:70.72.222.252 1663: 1656: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1623: 1621: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1564: 1556: 1551: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1486:I think that 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1448: 1447: 1441: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1370: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1288: 1287: 1282: 1281: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1270: 1265: 1260: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1231:However, the 1229: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1218: 1213: 1211: 1203: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1049: 1043: 1035: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 995: 991: 987: 982: 981: 980: 979: 975: 971: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 944: 943: 942: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 922: 918: 913: 912: 911: 910: 906: 902: 896: 878: 874: 870: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 850: 849: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 831: 830: 826: 822: 818: 817: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 795: 794: 790: 786: 781: 780: 779: 776: 771: 770: 769: 768: 765: 758: 746: 745: 744: 741: 737: 733: 732: 729: 728: 727: 724: 720: 719: 718: 714: 710: 709: 705: 701: 695: 694: 690: 686: 680: 677: 670: 668: 666: 662: 658: 654: 643: 641: 635: 631: 627: 626:66.32.223.104 623: 617: 616: 615: 613: 609: 605: 601: 591: 589: 588: 584: 580: 575: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 529: 528: 527: 523: 519: 511:Advertisement 510: 508: 490: 489: 482: 479: 478: 475: 474: 470: 465: 460: 459: 431: 427: 426: 424: 422: 418: 416: 412: 408: 405: 403: 402: 397: 395: 392: 390: 389: 384: 382: 378: 374: 371: 369: 368: 363: 361: 358: 356: 355: 350: 349: 346: 342: 338: 337: 334: 333: 329: 328: 324: 320: 316: 310: 307: 306: 303: 286: 282: 278: 277: 269: 258: 256: 253: 249: 248: 244: 238: 235: 232: 228: 215: 211: 205: 202: 201: 198: 181: 177: 173: 172: 167: 164: 160: 159: 155: 149: 146: 143: 139: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2760: 2753: 2746: 2721: 2698: 2688: 2670: 2664: 2660: 2649: 2631: 2629: 2616: 2614: 2601: 2599: 2586: 2579: 2577: 2557: 2553: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2534: 2529: 2527: 2488:— Preceding 2485: 2462: 2415:— Preceding 2412: 2409: 2404: 2397: 2375: 2372: 2347:source check 2326: 2320: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2297: 2258: 2255: 2227:— Preceding 2222: 2209: 2195: 2190: 2189: 2184: 2183: 2179:Poor Quality 2178: 2177: 2172: 2171: 2150: 2144: 2112:Webconverger 2110: 2076: 2062: 2035: 1982: 1956: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1812: 1807: 1797: 1794: 1789: 1764: 1756: 1750: 1746: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1619: 1560: 1557:adfotainment 1549: 1485: 1464: 1458: 1452: 1449: 1391: 1307:Fifth Screen 1304: 1263: 1261: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1236: 1232: 1230: 1222: 1220: 1215: 1214: 1209: 1207: 1066: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1029: 1021: 1002:— Preceding 998: 966: 897: 893: 821:AnmaFinotera 803:AnmaFinotera 756: 715: 711: 696: 681: 678: 674: 651:— Preceding 647: 639: 595: 576: 553:— Preceding 549: 514: 506: 468: 420: 419: 399: 398: 386: 385: 365: 364: 360:Mackay Radio 352: 351: 314: 274: 209: 169: 120: 80: 40:WikiProjects 2722:I see that 2549:hospitality 2545:restaurants 2494:Technodudes 2314:Sourcecheck 2233:Technodudes 2198:Technodudes 2155:Barnabypage 1987:—Preceding 1965:74.5.49.253 1959:—Preceding 1937:Barnabypage 1881:WP:ELPOINTS 1868:Photography 1860:Film_making 1833:—Preceding 1773:Barnabypage 1711:—Preceding 1691:Barnabypage 1660:—Preceding 1587:Barnabypage 1515:Barnabypage 1409:Barnabypage 1355:Barnabypage 1326:Barnabypage 1292:Barnabypage 1008:64.83.35.66 986:Barnabypage 970:Noventri-ds 952:Barnabypage 930:Barnabypage 839:Barnabypage 807:Barnabypage 785:Barnabypage 775:Barnabypage 764:Barnabypage 740:Barnabypage 723:Barnabypage 620:—Preceding 598:—Preceding 559:Technodudes 30:Start-class 2779:Categories 2650:Reference: 2632:Reference: 2617:Reference: 2602:Reference: 2580:Reference: 2384:Report bug 2114:is an OSS 1993:AllSeeTech 1877:WP:NOTLINK 1245:The Screen 1022:References 736:Simetrical 407:Multimedia 381:Sound bite 2763:DavidCary 2718:redirects 2672:BronHiggs 2561:BronHiggs 2518:articles. 2441:solutions 2367:this tool 2360:this tool 1935:mention. 1889:Legion722 1605:Legion722 1568:Legion722 1533:Legion722 1496:Legion722 1469:Legion722 1426:Legion722 1394:Legion722 1341:Legion722 1311:Legion722 1184:Legion722 1155:Legion722 1105:Legion722 1070:Legion722 901:Legion722 869:Legion722 854:Legion722 685:Rubén Mar 481:Archive 1 176:Marketing 2756:WP:R#PLA 2512:Response 2502:contribs 2490:unsigned 2429:contribs 2421:Audwin05 2417:unsigned 2373:Cheers.— 2241:contribs 2229:unsigned 2173:Outdated 2118:product 2079:Jimwelch 2065:Jimwelch 2001:contribs 1989:unsigned 1961:unsigned 1835:unsigned 1725:contribs 1717:Wefrisch 1713:unsigned 1662:unsigned 1278:mention. 1004:unsigned 653:unsigned 622:unsigned 600:unsigned 567:contribs 555:unsigned 469:Archives 2646:Nielsen 2300:checked 2265:my edit 2098:MrOllie 2018:MrOllie 2014:WP:ELNO 1885:WP:FIVE 1682:WP:ELNO 1388:Archive 1301:Content 948:blogged 852:answer? 537:MrOllie 428:Answer 367:Cleanup 317:on the 212:on the 123:on the 2751:page. 2639:NASDAQ 2541:retail 2308:failed 2128:Hendry 2046:Hendry 1128:Jcwang 1086:Jcwang 579:Hendry 401:Verify 36:scale. 2042:HTML5 1916:time. 1864:Music 1802:see: 1798:see: 1465:merge 1044:POPAI 671:Links 421:Other 290:Media 281:Media 237:Media 2767:talk 2709:talk 2676:talk 2642:IPOs 2565:talk 2547:and 2498:talk 2449:talk 2425:talk 2304:true 2237:talk 2202:talk 2159:talk 2132:talk 2102:talk 2083:talk 2069:talk 2050:talk 2032:SMIL 2022:talk 2016:. - 1997:talk 1969:talk 1941:talk 1893:talk 1866:and 1843:talk 1777:talk 1751:free 1721:talk 1695:talk 1670:talk 1609:talk 1591:talk 1572:talk 1537:talk 1529:IPTV 1519:talk 1500:talk 1473:talk 1430:talk 1413:talk 1398:talk 1378:talk 1359:talk 1345:talk 1330:talk 1315:talk 1188:talk 1159:talk 1132:talk 1109:talk 1090:talk 1074:talk 1012:talk 990:talk 974:talk 956:talk 934:talk 905:talk 873:talk 858:talk 843:talk 825:talk 811:talk 789:talk 734:Per 704:talk 689:talk 661:talk 630:talk 608:talk 583:talk 563:talk 541:talk 522:talk 388:NPOV 2585:of 2341:RfC 2318:). 2306:or 2291:to 2279:to 2151:not 2126:. - 1828:or 1374:App 1269:Rhi 1060:Rhi 759:all 592:ROI 309:Low 204:Mid 115:Mid 2781:: 2769:) 2711:) 2703:. 2678:) 2567:) 2504:) 2500:• 2451:) 2431:) 2427:• 2354:. 2349:}} 2345:{{ 2316:}} 2312:{{ 2243:) 2239:• 2204:) 2161:) 2134:) 2104:) 2085:) 2071:) 2052:) 2024:) 2003:) 1999:• 1971:) 1943:) 1895:) 1862:, 1845:) 1779:) 1727:) 1723:• 1697:) 1672:) 1611:) 1603:-- 1593:) 1585:. 1574:) 1539:) 1521:) 1502:) 1475:) 1432:) 1415:) 1400:) 1380:) 1361:) 1347:) 1332:) 1317:) 1267:-- 1243:) 1190:) 1161:) 1134:) 1111:) 1092:) 1076:) 1014:) 992:) 976:) 958:) 946:I 936:) 919:). 907:) 875:) 860:) 845:) 827:) 813:) 791:) 706:) 691:) 663:) 632:) 610:) 585:) 569:) 565:• 543:) 524:) 413:, 409:, 379:, 375:, 2765:( 2707:( 2674:( 2563:( 2496:( 2447:( 2423:( 2386:) 2382:( 2369:. 2362:. 2235:( 2200:( 2157:( 2130:( 2100:( 2081:( 2067:( 2048:( 2020:( 1995:( 1967:( 1939:( 1891:( 1870:. 1841:( 1775:( 1719:( 1693:( 1668:( 1607:( 1589:( 1570:( 1535:( 1517:( 1498:( 1471:( 1428:( 1411:( 1396:( 1376:( 1357:( 1343:( 1328:( 1313:( 1239:( 1186:( 1157:( 1130:( 1107:( 1088:( 1072:( 1010:( 988:( 972:( 954:( 932:( 903:( 871:( 856:( 841:( 823:( 809:( 787:( 702:( 687:( 659:( 628:( 606:( 581:( 561:( 539:( 520:( 423:: 404:: 391:: 370:: 357:: 321:. 216:. 127:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index