84:
74:
53:
176:
158:
22:
553:
of polygons with even number of sides where squares are reduced either to digons or edges. There can be reasons to keep digons, and the Euler characteristic is unchanged since you're adding or removing n faces and n edges.
140:
419:
I'd stick with t{2,n}, truncated hosohedra as
Coxeter expresses, and just leave the dihedrons in peace. Or say a dihedron is a degenerate prism with height of zero (it already says that).
639:
224:
629:
230:
130:
624:
634:
106:
200:
97:
58:
579:
569:
479:
451:
443:
423:
345:
Hmmm... Cantellation isn't usually applied across 2 branches. t{2,n} works better, or a bitruncation from a dihedron as 2t{2,n}.
593:
for a special case wythoff construction of uniform prisms for both spherical tilings and polyhedra. But you could argue better
589:
489:
471:
461:
433:
183:
163:
574:
584:
484:
466:
456:
438:
428:
288:
257:
33:
561:. And it could apply in any polyhedron, replacing any edge with 2 edges and a digon between. It is important for
363:,2} and bevelling the edges, each edge turns into a square, and the hemispherical polygons shrink, creating an
21:
550:
410:
372:
334:
521:
with zero height, then there are two degeneracy interpretations possible. Each side face become either a
270:
39:
83:
278:
262:
199:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
73:
52:
606:
498:
406:
392:
368:
350:
330:
303:
266:
518:
557:
Anyway, I admit I've not read anything to support this specifically, or it is here I guess
175:
157:
594:
598:
618:
602:
494:
388:
346:
299:
295:
102:
79:
562:
196:
192:
188:
558:
522:
610:
502:
414:
396:
376:
354:
338:
307:
254:
15:
549:
vertices. This sort of topological problem also exists in
367:-gonal prism. We should probably list both constructions.
565:
which do have digon faces since
Coxeter uses t{2,n} =
359:
Perhaps so, but it does work: if you imagine taking r{
187:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
229:This article has not yet received a rating on the
525:or single edge. So the regular form has 2 faces,
517:It seems to me that if a dihedron is seen as a
387:,2}={n,2}, another reason rr is problematic.
8:
19:
152:
47:
154:
49:
640:Unknown-importance Polyhedra articles
597:digons are more real since they make
7:
181:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
277:,2} dihedron transforms it into a
14:
630:Low-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
625:Start-Class mathematics articles
587:
582:
577:
572:
567:
487:
482:
477:
469:
464:
459:
454:
449:
441:
436:
431:
426:
421:
174:
156:
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
401:You're right: we ought to use t
209:Knowledge:WikiProject Polyhedra
135:This article has been rated as
635:Start-Class Polyhedra articles
559:Digon#Theoretical significance
212:Template:WikiProject Polyhedra
1:
611:23:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
203:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
529:edges and vertices, while a
656:
231:project's importance scale
503:09:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
415:08:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
397:11:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
377:10:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
355:09:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
339:13:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
228:
169:
134:
67:
46:
308:07:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
273:operation on a regular {
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
533:solution could have 2
28:This article is rated
513:As a degenerate prism
313:Yup, it should be rr{
184:WikiProject Polyhedra
541:2-gonal faces, and 2
263:Wythoff construction
121:mathematics articles
252:Recently removed:
248:truncation or what
215:Polyhedra articles
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
293:
292:
267:dihedral symmetry
245:
244:
241:
240:
237:
236:
151:
150:
147:
146:
647:
592:
591:
590:
586:
585:
581:
580:
576:
575:
571:
570:
492:
491:
490:
486:
485:
481:
480:
474:
473:
472:
468:
467:
463:
462:
458:
457:
453:
452:
446:
445:
444:
440:
439:
435:
434:
430:
429:
425:
424:
255:
217:
216:
213:
210:
207:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
655:
654:
650:
649:
648:
646:
645:
644:
615:
614:
599:spherical lunes
595:antipodal point
588:
583:
578:
573:
568:
566:
515:
488:
483:
478:
476:
470:
465:
460:
455:
450:
448:
442:
437:
432:
427:
422:
420:
405:then, I guess?
404:
250:
214:
211:
208:
205:
204:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
653:
651:
643:
642:
637:
632:
627:
617:
616:
514:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
402:
381:
380:
379:
342:
341:
325:,2} is just {2
291:
290:
287:
259:
249:
246:
243:
242:
239:
238:
235:
234:
227:
221:
220:
218:
201:the discussion
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
652:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
626:
623:
622:
620:
613:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
564:
560:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
512:
504:
500:
496:
418:
417:
416:
412:
408:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
285:
282:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
247:
232:
226:
223:
222:
219:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
556:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
516:
407:Double sharp
384:
369:Double sharp
364:
360:
331:Double sharp
326:
322:
318:
314:
296:Cantellation
294:
283:
279:
274:
251:
195:, and other
182:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
551:alternation
545:edges, and
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
619:Categories
537:-gons and
271:truncation
563:hosohedra
493:= n-gon.
206:Polyhedra
197:polytopes
193:polyhedra
164:Polyhedra
603:Tom Ruen
495:Tom Ruen
389:Tom Ruen
347:Tom Ruen
321:}Ă—{}: t{
286:-prism.
189:polygons
531:uniform
475:--: -->
447:--: -->
317:,2} = {
300:Tamfang
261:From a
139:on the
36:scale.
523:digon
519:prism
329:,2}.
280:4.4.n
607:talk
499:talk
411:talk
393:talk
373:talk
351:talk
335:talk
304:talk
269:, a
403:0,2
298:? —
265:on
225:???
131:Low
621::
609:)
601:.
501:)
413:)
395:)
383:r{
375:)
353:)
337:)
306:)
289:”
258:“
191:,
605:(
547:n
543:n
539:n
535:n
527:n
497:(
409:(
391:(
385:n
371:(
365:n
361:n
349:(
333:(
327:n
323:n
319:n
315:n
302:(
284:n
275:n
233:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
