1883:
with epilepsy fasting through history. The Bible has Jesus recommend the disciples pray with fasting (i.e. with great devotion) for the sick person, not that the sick person fasts for themselves. In fact, historical reference to this passage wrt epilepsy treatment mentions some people would carry a small piece of paper quoting those verses, as though the words themselves would offer protection. Anyway, I assume some ketogenic diet doctor got carried away with themselves one day and this nonsense gets copy/pasted without engaging brain cells. Our article doesn't mention it at all, on the basis that no scholarly
Biblical or history of epilepsy works do either. Is this similar? Where some brain fart by a doctor in 1855 is destined to be forever repeated? I haven't read the criticism of this theory, though one can imagine that since dracunculiasis does not involve being bitten nor is death such a likely outcome that "many people of Israel died" would seem to be big negatives, and we are left clutching at "fiery serpent" for an explanation, but then any snake bit would cause a fiery pain. See
1615:
for anything other than being our oldest evidence. Does anyone seriously suggest humans might not have had dracunculiasis in 2000 BCE or even stretching back into our origins as a species in those locations? The fact that it can infect other animals, and that there are other species worldwide that infect animals in a similar way, would suggest perhaps we have always had it in those regions of the world. Maybe the first half of this sentence could be dropped and we simply document that it has likely been described in antiquity. Similarly for the body text, I think saying "has been with humans for at least 3,000 years" is misleading, and is more really a reflection of the limits of how old documented medical history/archaeology is.
708:, with the exception of references to numerical data. Apparently those references were called upon elsewhere, but I'd removed the definitions. I could swear a bot used to swoop in and fix those errors by resurrecting the reference definitions from the page history, but apparently that's not working anymore? Anyway, the remaining calls to those references will probably be removed as I update the rest of the lead, since many of them are now dated. If the red error messages really bother you in the mean time, I can manually resurrect the reference definitions. Does that address your concern? Or did you have other issues with the content changes? Thanks and I hope all is well.
1818:"Dracunculiasis is nearly eradicated" I don't think the WHO source supports this claim, which describes the programme being "hindered" and non-human cases. Rather than using a crystal ball, how about we just describe the massive change in epidemiology: "The epidemiology of dracunculiasis has changed dramatically since 1986, when the World Health Assembly called for dracunculiasis' eradication. In that year there were an estimated 3.5 million cases across 20 countries. By 2020, there were only 21 cases in humans worldwide, and only 15 in 2021. Dracunculiasis remains endemic in just four countries: Chad, Ethiopia, Mali, and South Sudan."
1302:!!). I can't find an article on this right now, but the story I was told is that a few years ago the authors got together, decided selling a $ 100+ textbook on diseases of the poor was ridiculous, and wrote an updated edition on their own sans publisher. The last two(?) editions have been available free online, as well as a Spanish translation. "Parasites Without Borders" is just the name they made up to publish under, and presumably a vehicle for accepting donations. The book has a bit of a clunky look without the trappings of a textbook publishing company, but I believe it's seen as reliable. The 6th edition was reviewed in
1781:"When worms emerge near joints, the inflammation around a dead worm, or infection of the open wound can result in permanent stiffness, pain, or destruction of the joint" The grammar isn't right here, as the second clause is read as though it was following chronologically from the first (but a dead worm doesn't emerge). Instead this is a list of three scenarios that presumably lead to "permanent stiffness, pain, or destruction of the joint". And "the joint" is only clearly meaningful in the first scenario. The other two might affect a nearby joint, assuming there is one nearby.
1913:
significance. If we value reliable sources backed up with serious evidence, and for history, what modern scholars really think, then both such topics are at the "inject bleach and invermectin" level of "someone once said something" significance. By continuing to cover this in an otherwise fact and evidence-based article we are doing our readers a disservice, planting ridiculous ideas into our readers heads along with all the good stuff. All we do is encourage future parasitologists desperate for a novelty factoid and image for the start of their PowerPoint presentation. --
1814:"Sources of drinking water can also be protected through public education campaigns, informing people in affected areas how dracunculiasis spreads and encouraging those with the disease to avoid soaking their wounds in bodies of water that are used for drinking." This sentence loops round and begins and ends with water used for drinking. Maybe just shorten it to "Public education campaigns inform people in affected areas how dracunculiasis spreads and encourage those with the disease to avoid soaking their wounds in bodies of water that are used for drinking".
1856:"Within a given place, dracunculiasis risk is linked to occupation; people who farm or fetch drinking water are most likely to be infected". I don't understand why this should be so. Are such people likely to drink the water at-source rather than water that someone else has transported and left to settle? If you scoop up a bucket of infected water and carry it to your family, who then drink it, why would it affect the water carrier more than the other recipients? What is it about farming vs fishing or hunting or labouring, say, that makes one more at risk?
230:
209:
1102:. That said, perhaps I'm under-selling the dog infections? I'll add some text on the canine case counts and trends to the animal section, and if you think it deserves more sunshine I can add something to Prevention or Epidemiology as well. (3) Wow, I somehow missed the baboon thing completely. I now see it mentioned several places. Will look into it. (4) The Carter Center - I know it seems bizarre, but The Carter Center really is the major international force behind the eradication effort. See
176:
1098:(1) I'll have to look into the three years/certification issue. Adding it to the to-do list so I don't lose track. (2) Dog infections derailing eradication was all the buzz ~5 years ago, but now canine cases are reliably decreasing year-over-year, and my impression is folks are far less concerned than they were as recently as ~2017. Funny enough, this month's "Guinea Worm Wrap-Up" (the WHO/CDC guinea worm newsletter) highlighted the decreasing dog cases in this ugly and confusing graph
456:
435:
21:
614:
167:
1680:(which hosts infamously exhaustive reviews). It has a "Morphology" section which notes "Males have been recovered only doubtfully from humans, but those from experimental animals measure 15 to 40 by 0.4 mm." That review was written 20 years ago, but I suspect that's still the state of our knowledge (after all, you'd need to dig around in a human body ~3 months after infection to recover a male worm...). I'll reach out to the
1878:"The disease of "fiery serpents" that plagues the Hebrews" I don't think it is accurate to describe this as a "disease", using Knowledge (XXG)'s voice, as it isn't so described in the Bible. We can just drop "disease of". This contentious speculation would be better explained in-text rather than with a footnote, though a footnote giving the Biblical reference and quotation is appropriate. I faced a similar issue at
407:
1766:"There is no vaccine or medicine to treat or prevent Guinea worm disease" See comment above about "Guinea worm disease" vs dracunculiasis. Also I think we should drop mention of vaccine here. I know some vaccines are useful in the treatment of some diseases, but that's not typical, and the Prevention section shortly after this leads with "There is no vaccine for dracunculiasis" so we end up repeating ourselves.
2025:. If we don't mention it, I think we're doing the reader a disservice (and annoyingly, they'll probably keep adding the uncritical version). At the same time, to your point, I think a sentence in the History section is all it's due. So I tried to breeze through it quickly. You've added a bit more color to make the reader even more skeptical of Velschius' claim. That seems fine.
325:
298:
704:, pardon me for undoing your big reversion a moment ago. I've been working on this improving this article for a while (see history). I've updated most of the sections (still working on history and eradication campaign!). Last week I started to update the lead, which I typically save for last. In the process, I removed some references from the lead per
335:
2084:
528:
2229:
any case much too little (far too recent) to match the remarkable graph. I suggest the table should go. Better, if detailed illustration is thought necessary, would be a map from the 2011 dataset and a matching map from the 2023 dataset with countries coloured by their data values (or the numbers could be overlaid on the maps).
2370:"at the lastest" Apologies. Man plans; god laughs. And all that. All done. There are two items I disagreed with and noted reasons above. If you feel the disagreement spots are worth pursuing, we can seek other opinions. I'm not sure the talk page gets much traffic, but we can certainly try posting there or perhaps
859:
dracunculiasis). I'm not opposed to adding it to the
History section here, but I'll feel more comfortable if I can find a source written by someone with some expertise in ancient Egypt. I'll take a closer look as soon as I can, but if folks feel strongly about it, feel free to add it back in the meantime.
2228:
The large table in 'Eradication' goes to great length to say what the small graph says more clearly; I doubt we need annual data by country in an article of this kind, and the assembling of the data in this manner is a bit uncomfortable, as is the set of overlapping maps. The table's date range is in
2020:
about whether
Velschius' view is "worth publishing". I think it should remain in the article because Velschius' claim about the Rod of Asclepius is widely and uncritically repeated in parasitology and public health texts, as if it were decided fact. Several of the otherwise excellent sources for this
1906:
that this is an ancient symbol linked to dracunculiasis by some guy (Georg
Hieronymous Velschius) who "saw drancunculi everywhere including on ancient Roman emblems, in the signs of the zodiac, among marine nemertines and polychaetes, in Arabic lettering, in many Greek sculptures and in the emblem of
1882:
where quite a few sources repeat the total rot that Jesus suggested fasting as a cure for epilepsy (and therefore presumably the ketogenic diet comes divinely recommended). I've got a scholarly book on the history of epilepsy and believe me if there was any evidence of this, we'd have recorded people
1774:
or prevent it from causing disease once within the body". I'm not sure I love my new wording; I was trying to get across that once you're infected there's no pharmaceutical intervention -- but I didn't want to say there's "no medication to treat..." since the CDC does recommend anti-inflammatories...
1706:
Well would you look at that, I Googled the textbook title to get the details for a resource exchange request, and Google brought up an (almost certainly illegally hosted) online 2009 version. I won't link it here for obvious reasons, but it notes "A major difficulty in taxonomy of dracunculids is the
1381:
that he acquired the copyright from the publisher in 1995 and now distributes a Kindle version ($ 7) and the facsimile of the 1990 edition (free). His link to the 1990 edition download is now dead. I took the liberty of assuming it died due to neglect rather than choice, and so I included the link to
2201:
My gentle preference would be not to. The textbook sources I use don't describe it in this way -- possibly because they don't want to surface negative associations, though possibly they just don't think it's important. "with a larvicide known as temephos (ABATE)" (Parasitic
Diseases), "with the safe
1648:
people, but if there are toxic chemicals and an inflammatory response to burst worms, etc, then that isn't allergy is it, which is a word more used to mean an abnormal immune response to a normally harmless thing. I would have thought having an unpleasant immune response to an 80cm worm bursting and
1163:
Hmmm, my impression is that the reliability of a country's surveillance system is the major consideration for the ICCDE when deciding whether to certify a country free of dracunculiasis. But how it goes about making that determination, and what experts think of the reliability of case counts I don't
662:
Hello to any talk page watchers, this is the next article on my list for a pet project of cleaning up some of the WHO neglected tropical disease articles. I'll probably hit the sections in order, sporadically as I find time. Happy to have help, suggestions, et al. I'll also leave some clean-up notes
1940:
Just popping by to say thank you for the comments -- and a reiterated thank you to everyone else who commented above. Pardon the silence. Real life has been taking all my time the last few days. It's looking like I'll get some chunks of time to do research and address comments in the latter half of
1868:
I wonder if the seasonal epidemiology section is more appropriate in the past tense. There are no longer cases along the Gulf of Guinea, and the data in the WHO report for the four other countries don't support much seasonal analysis (though the cases for dogs in Chad peak in June and are high from
1801:
We don't really explain how the person is disabled. I get that it is very sore and the would needs attention, but is that really enough to mean a person couldn't walk or work or study or look after their family. Is it the pain or is it the concern the worm might get damaged and die? I think we need
1039:
All of the CDC citations have old dates; those pages have last reviewed date at the bottom of each page, and we should make sure we are using the latest page and that the text is still verified. (I can check and update those when I have more time if no one gets to it before me, but I have two very
1912:
How to deal with this? My vote really is remove both entirely from this article, and certainly the image as that will stick this foolishness in people's head. The matter is covered by the other articles, placing it within scholarly historical analysis and giving it (we hope) appropriate weight and
1614:
Humans have had dracunculiasis since at least 1,000 BCE" I'm not sure about the tense here. The body says "Dracunculiasis has been with humans for at least 3,000 years". But more importantly, it seems to be giving too much emphasis to our oldest evidence as though the 1000 BCE dates is significant
1127:
I wonder if there are any sources that discuss the accuracy of the case counts. I imagine it is difficult to carry out effective surveillance programs in impoverished areas of rural Africa, and when we are talking about counts of only a few dozen cases a year, a few missed cases could make a large
960:
Fair enough. Looking at the four footnotes from Cox (2002), we have access to Grove (1990). I don't have access to the other three sources cited by Cox (2002). Cox himself is listed as the editor of Tayeh (1996), so in a sense it is self-citing. It seems
Hoeppli was later disgraced for reasons not
858:
Yes, thanks for bringing this back up. Unfortunately this topic is sometimes obfuscated by authors who write with expertise on medicine, but overreach on the armchair history (e.g. many modern medical sources state it as a matter of settled fact that the fiery serpents passage in
Hebrews refers to
2423:
I think we take that sort of caveat as read in natural
English: "when it is completed, the tower will be the tallest in the world" doesn't need "unless someone else builds a taller one in the meantime": we take "all unspecified context carrying on as normal" as an implied in any sentence of that
1745:
article says "at up to 80 centimetres (31 inches) in length" and "females (length 70â120 cm)". We seem inconsistent here between the articles. Having a typical length as well as a range could be useful. Again, I think the inch conversions here are incorrect in that the cm figure has clearly been
1076:
The issue of three years with no cases = eradication requires some explanation or clarification, when we're looking at a table that shows Mali going four years with no cases, then back again. I've also come across a lot of information about the surging cases in dogs, which have thrown the whole
896:
Well, I haven't spent much time studying the history of medicine and I've already gathered that tracing any disease back to the oldest surviving medical document is almost a cliché at this point. Without going into to much detail I'd be ok with calling this a complex issue outside the scope of a
2283:
The category "Parasitic infestations, stings, and bites of the skin" seems to be largely for insect bites and other such; Guinea worm is a penetrating, internal worm so the category isn't a good match for this article. Actually the category is a total mess and probably needs reworking into some
802:
correctly, but should (May â October) actually not be a spaced dash? Secondly, I would suggest shortening the lede which is at 460-ish words. While ledes for articles on diseases can be even longer, this is a disease with simple diagnostic and treatment procedures and I believe a reduction is
1810:"Where possible, open sources of drinking water are replaced by deep wells that can serve as new sources of clean water". This repeats itself, as "new sources of clean water" is that same as "are replaced by". Would it be better to explain how/that deep wells are unlikely to be contaminated?
968:
So the claim has been around for a while and, dubious or not, is still being repeated in reliable sources in 2019. Even with the above caveats concerning translation/interpretation and wishful thinking, I think including it in the history section (as with the Old
Testament, presented as an
2407:
It will be the âsecondâ only if it succeeds AND no other human diseases are eradicated first. If the disease is eradicated because of the program, but not until after polio, for example, is eradicated, I would still consider it a success, even though it will be the third, not the second.
2232:
Agreed, removed. I do have space for another illustration or two. If I were to find/generate a visual aid for any part of the article, would the map you reference above be your first choice? If you think there's another illustration that would be better, happy to work on that instead.
1907:
the medical profession". Note how our source places no more significance on this association than with Arabic lettering or ancient Roman emblems, and places it very firmly as the enthusiastic speculation of someone a tad obsessed (wrote a 456 page book in 1674) with the disease.
1925:
I've rewritten this bit to try to frame it in more appropriate context. I'm very hesitant to remove it completely, as these claims are often uncritically repeated in medical literature, and I'm concerned people will just add the contextless, no-doubt wrong version back.
2267:"paratenic host" needs a brief explanatory gloss. Or just call it a "transport host" or "secondary host" for the sake of general readers: the terms are in common use and don't involve rare Greek etymologies ("to stretch out beside", for some reason, don't ask).
1659:
article says "In contrast, the longest recorded male Guinea worm is only 4 cm (1+1â2 in)". So is 4cm a very typical length as well as being the longest, or is there more variation. I reckon the (1+1â2 in) text is more accurately approximate than (1.6 in).
2333:
Many thanks for taking the time to review. I hope I'll have a moment to get to this tomorrow, but if not I'll be held up until early next week. So if there's a few days silence from me, just know your comments are appreciated and soon to be acted upon.
1078:... and I came across a mention of baboons. Will add that source here once I re-locate it from last night's reading. The eradication stuff seems overly optimistic, or something. Also, not comfortable using The Carter Center for data (should I be?).
1643:
article's pathology section mentions quite a lot that this article does not. Is there a reason those aspects (toxic chemical, non-emergence, inflammatory response, joint/CNS infection etc) are missing? This article covers an allergic reaction in
2202:
larvicide temephos" (Atlas of
Pediatrics), "with the larvicide Temephos" (Galan-Puchades, 2019 - not a textbook, but I accidentally opened the PDF at the same time). Ditto the broad public-facing sources: "by using the larvicide temephos" (
1652:"emerge from separate blisters at the same time" if it takes a year to reach the leg, would they really all emerge at the same time, or would one endure fresh ulcers appearing and resolving over months? Can we say any more about that?
1671:
I cited here claims "The smaller male typically measures 40 mm by 0.4 mm", hence the current text. To my surprise, all the other sources in the article are mum on the male's size. The only other source I could find on the matter is
2481:
778:
The article states than only humans, dogs and ferrets can be hosts. Why are other mammals not potential hosts? This should be explained if possible as it is an obvious question that came to my mind when reading the article.
1143:
Agree ... I saw divergent numbers in my reading last night, but didn't get out of bed to write them down :) In one report from The Carter Center, it mentioned the numbers weren't "official" until "certified", or some such.
822:, thanks for the comments. I've made the dash change you suggested. I'm all for shortening the lead, but I'm embarrassingly bad at seeing where my own writing should be shortened. Any recommendations are much appreciated.
839:
On another note (and with thanks to our friendly neighbourhood IP-editor): what do you think about including the claims about Eber's papyrus in the history section. They are repeated by Despommier (2019) p. 295. citing
2250:
Amazing proverb, hadn't heard that before. I'm inclined to disagree. I think the somewhat large eradication section is due here. This is a disease that affects about as few people as any. It's primarily written about
180:
2198:...), but no Western country would want to see anything like that in their water supply, so the recommendation is a bit startling. Though says it's safer than Chlorine, so there. Maybe is redundant for this claim.
2220:"there could be as many as 48 million cases" in 1947: perhaps "could have been", or something of that sort. Fascinating paper by Stoll, by the way. (Loved the 3.3 billion prediction for world population in 2000...)
2471:
2456:
1837:"Cases tend to be split roughly equally between males and females, and can occur in all age groups." I wonder if we need to say this at all, which is a rather wordy way of saying there isn't a sex/age bias.
137:
35:
2486:
1186:
We're left with the idea that if the infected individual never put the wound in water, it would never "burst" ... is that the case? It would just ... stay there forever, without expelling the larvae?
2247:, this section should be a short summary of that article (resembling its concise lead section) rather than an extensive treatise. No point keeping a dog and barking yourself, to quote an old proverb.
1382:
the InternetArchive version of the text. I'm happy to remove the link if folks think that's an over-reach. Also he's still alive as best I can tell; I can reach out to him to see what he thinks...
2194:" larvicide temephos" - perhaps gloss this "the organophosphate larvicide temephos". I don't know if we should get into a discussion of the wisdom of adding organophosphates to drinking water (...
1667:
article cites the 2009 and 2012 editions of a textbook I can't seem to find (a local library has the 2000 edition of the same book -- can't decide if it's worth the trip...). The 2019 version of
1564:"used to occur throughout Central Africa, Yemen, India, Pakistan, and to a lesser extent Latin America." (Despommier, et al. 2019 - holding out for a more specific description in another source)
1625:
I wonder if the eradication description in the lead could be made a bit less detailed and we add something about it affecting some other animals, and related species affecting other animals.
569:
1544:"The first signs of dracunculiasis occur around a year after infection, as the full-grown female worm prepares to leave the infected person's body." - second half not supported by ref.
416:
308:
1608:"public education campaigns to prevent people from" I don't think a campaign can "prevent" people from doing something, only laws and force could achieve that. How about "discourage"?
1761:", as we already name it at the start of the sentence and perhaps should avoid confusing with an alternative name (which we have presumably chosen not to use for the article title).
353:
538:
357:
1374:
1976:
Did a few easy ones. I hope you don't mind I struck the suggestions for which I simply implemented your wording. I'm doing some research to address the others. Thanks all!
1540:" This is primarily accomplished by filtering drinking water to physically remove copepods." - Sources don't support that this is the primary aim of prevention strategies.
2122:
1112:
on eradication which notes " has been led since 1986 by The Carter Center..." and it goes on to elaborate. I suppose I should emphasize that in the text in some way...
798:
The article seems to be in good shape. I checked 8 random notes and only needed to make a correction to a page number. Two minor issues: I'm not sure if I'm reading the
80:
2521:
280:
2112:
914:
Nothing medical gets decided at FAC these days; all of the involved medical reviewers who would/could/might weigh in at FAC are already present on this talk page.
2496:
2089:
270:
506:
1427:
563:
1448:) 18:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Besides the differential diagnosis question on Spicy's talk, that's all I've got for now. I will watchlist and stay tuned in.
2466:
397:
2541:
496:
1212:
blister bursts in 1-3 days, and worm spews larvae in response to water. Updated in Signs & Symptoms; will tweak the wording in Cause as well. Thanks!
2511:
2501:
1859:
I don't have a source that spells this out per se, but my understanding is that at the village folks are more likely to have large nylon filters or even
387:
1298:
is a textbook that has been running through occasional editions since the 80s, originally published by Springer (ridiculously, Springer still offers to
246:
2546:
2526:
2476:
2404:
The sentence â If the eradication program succeeds, dracunculiasis will become the second human disease eradicated, after smallpoxâ is incorrect.
1806:"Additionally, sources of drinking water can be treated with the larvicide temephos, which kills copepods" Don't think "Additionally" is necessary.
472:
2531:
2491:
2451:
2516:
877:
out of the lead because it's speculative, perhaps overly optimistic, and there are too many variables. But I don't feel strongly about that.
362:
2536:
682:) and then of course we can pick an image of the blister post-eruption with the worm coming out. Will looks around after going over the text
237:
214:
2356:
Thanks for the ping. Did the easy ones this morning, will get to the rest by the end of the weekend at the latest. Pardon my slow replies.
1556:
Incorporating Sandy's facts above (#larvae, more specific timeline, more details on stomach exit, the male and female meet a few months in)
2094:
679:
2506:
2409:
2161:
2022:
463:
440:
1184:
When the wound touches freshwater, the female spews a milky-white substance containing hundreds of thousands of larvae into the water.
2117:
582:
2016:. I've combined the previous wording (which I wrote) and your version into a compromise that I hope you'll find acceptable. To your
1435:(And generally a lot of information that made it sound like eradication effort may be endangered because of the situation in dogs.)
2223:
Done. Glad you liked it. Some sources state Stoll's estimate as gospel truth, so I was quite tickled when I found the actual paper.
1099:
348:
303:
1635:"migrates to its final site" the female worm leaves the body, so perhaps this isn't its "final site". Would "exit site" be better?
2461:
2275:"The only other reptile affected is the snapping turtle" - suggest "reptiles" and "snapping turtles" as 2 species are mentioned.
1899:
1417:"the cyclops is dissolved by the gastric acid of the stomach and the larvae are released and migrate through the intestinal wall"
1399:
189:
2424:
kind. It does seem from the article that there are compelling reasons to assume that D. has a very good change of being the
30:
2068:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1903:
1428:
https://www.idse.net/Parasitology/Article/12-21/Global-Eradication-of-Guinea-Worm-Disease-Nears-Despite-Complications/65395
2395:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2244:
630:
1410:
Says "largest of the tissue parasite affecting humans" (how come I came across a gross youtube of something much bigger?)
2203:
1746:
rounded to a single digit of precision and so "(40 in)" and "30 inches" would be more appropriate imperial unit values.
1707:
sparsity of discovered males. The few specimens known range from 12 mm to 40 mm long." So another vote against the
1468:
Oops, forgot one ... read somewhere that the fleas are too small to be seen by the human eye, should mention that.
1863:
a well. Out in the fields or at the body of water, people are more likely to drink directly from the water source.
2430:
2195:
2136:
642:
1649:
dying in your leg would be "normal". The other article also mentions hand or scrotum as occasional exit points.
1002:
The article uses both dmy and mdy; which date format is preferred (I will run the script to address them all).
678:
Images - In the Signs and symptoms section I'd like to find an image of the blister pre-eruption (like Image 1
166:
20:
195:
40:
2413:
2323:
2155:
2140:
2052:
974:
965:
his book published in 1959 was well received. As for Foster (1965), E. & S. Livingstone is legit, right?
905:
849:
808:
597:
118:
99:
2318:
This is a well-written and compact article on a sad but curious topic. I hope to see it as a GA very soon.
1965:
1750:
1742:
1656:
1640:
1513:
1488:
Thank you for all the comments! I've just got a moment tonight, so I'll try to knock out a few easy ones.
1478:
1458:
1445:
1359:
1330:
1283:
1259:
1240:
1197:
1154:
1088:
1050:
1012:
951:
924:
887:
2258:
So it's the exceptionally long, exceptionally important "main" article summary. Don't make a habit of it!
1753:
article says "thousands of larvae". That's quite a significant difference in magnitude. Which is correct?
752:
2270:
Sure, went with "transport host" which hopefully at least gets the right idea across to the uninitiated.
875:
If the eradication program succeeds, dracunculiasis will become the second human disease ever eradicated
471:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
245:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2371:
2299:
The images, all from Commons, appear to be correctly licensed. All are clearly relevant to the article.
1378:
1884:
784:
577:
1342:
44:
1802:
more explanation of the disability. How often are "some people" affected for 12 to 18 months after.
1688:
article. If not, I'm gently inclined to believe the more detailed 2002 review over the more recent
1587:
I'm sure I'll have more to add. Just separating out the less-easy stuff for when I have a moment.
2379:
2361:
2339:
2319:
2151:
2048:
2030:
1981:
1946:
1931:
1845:
1826:
1790:
1716:
1697:
1592:
1493:
1387:
1311:
1217:
1169:
1117:
1066:
1028:
970:
938:
901:
864:
845:
827:
819:
804:
759:
713:
687:
668:
648:
1770:
Good point, I've changed up the wording of this sentence a bit to "There is no medicine to kill
229:
208:
1370:
1956:
1504:
1469:
1449:
1436:
1350:
1321:
1274:
1250:
1231:
1209:
1188:
1145:
1079:
1041:
1003:
942:
915:
878:
742:
727:
1404:
897:
GA-review, kicking the can down the road to be settled one way or the other during PR or FAC.
2013:
1891:
1873:"flowing water sources dry". I'd have written "dry up" but maybe that's a English variation?
1684:
folks to see if anyone can provide a photocopy of a recent chapter of the book cited in the
644:
613:
1400:
https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/dracunculiasis-(guinea-worm-disease)
1299:
799:
1995:
1918:
1730:
1133:
780:
340:
1681:
2213:
For the record, I hear the soft courtly tones of euphemism here, and I think I know why.
2207:
2021:
article that speak with authority to the medical aspects of the disease flub this, e.g.
1303:
1109:
1103:
455:
434:
1879:
1673:
543:
2445:
2375:
2357:
2349:
2335:
2026:
1977:
1942:
1927:
1841:
1822:
1786:
1758:
1712:
1693:
1588:
1569:
Look into certification process per SG's comment above regarding Mali's 3-year break.
1489:
1383:
1307:
1213:
1165:
1113:
1062:
1024:
860:
823:
755:
709:
683:
664:
738:
723:
705:
699:
242:
1349:; does it have copyright permission to post? Who is that, what is that publisher?
406:
1890:
Rod of Asclepius. This also appears to be nonsense. You can see from our article
841:
1840:
Gently disagree, but am open to changing it of course if others feel the same.
1991:
1914:
1726:
1129:
934:
468:
330:
1895:
2143:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
962:
1373:
called it the "definitive history of helminthology". CAB International is
646:
1875:"dry up" sounds fine to my (American) ear as well, so let's go with that.
1377:. As far as posting that link, I admit I may be on uncertain ground. The
836:
Thanks to Spicy it is now down to 402 words, I've no further suggestions!
1741:"the female is comparatively large, often over 100 cm (39 in) long".The
900:
As for the sentence in the lead, I don't feel strongly about it either.
2436:
2417:
2383:
2365:
2343:
2327:
2165:
2056:
2034:
1997:
1985:
1969:
1950:
1935:
1920:
1849:
1830:
1794:
1732:
1720:
1701:
1596:
1517:
1497:
1482:
1462:
1391:
1363:
1334:
1315:
1287:
1263:
1244:
1221:
1208:
I'm glad you noticed this, because it turns out I was dead wrong here.
1201:
1173:
1158:
1137:
1121:
1092:
1070:
1054:
1032:
1016:
978:
955:
928:
909:
891:
868:
853:
831:
812:
788:
763:
747:
732:
717:
691:
672:
1575:
Any sources discuss reliability of case counts? How does ICCDE decide?
1249:
Is it possible to avoid using the Merck Manual (website) as a source?
2482:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
663:
to self here so other folks can work on them if they choose. Cheers!
591:
558:
1639:
The symptoms here only cover the female leaving through a sore. The
1061:
I think I got all of them. Added something to the to-do list below.
1369:
This book is a total gem, 850 pages on an extremely niche topic. A
527:
324:
297:
1106:
where it lays out the surveillance system: village observers : -->
536:
for Knowledge (XXG)'s health content are defined in the guideline
1228:
360:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
1414:
Wow: "The adult female, which carries about 3 million embryos,"
649:
607:
522:
160:
2472:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1663:
This has been more challenging to resolve than expected. The
1580:
Add some text on dog cases and trends per SG's comment above.
352:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
1785:
Reworded this so hopefully the intended meaning is clearer.
405:
1757:"is unique to guinea worm disease" Perhaps better to say "
1405:
https://www.who.int/health-topics/dracunculiasis#tab=tab_1
2457:
Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page
2186:"name" or perhaps "descriptor". Felt too casual really.
1725:
I'm feeling sorry for these unloved unnoticed males. --
722:
It is a bad style to leave a red mess after your edits.
2017:
1346:
1270:
539:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
130:
111:
92:
73:
2487:
FA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1749:"hundreds of thousands of larvae into the water". The
1398:
Put a range on the "about a year" to 10 to 14 months?
2284:
better-defined entities, but that's not our problem.
1887:
for more examples and text mentioning fiery serpents.
1692:
claim. But we'll see if I can turn anything else up.
1503:
Very busy here, too, but watching ... looking good.
1420:"After 100 days, the male and female meet and mate."
467:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
241:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1375:
Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International
583:
clinical publications about evidence-based medicine
1955:Agreeing with Colin on the Rod of Asclepius bit.
1655:"male remains small at 4 cm (1.6 in) long". The
1549:What happens if the blister never touches water?
1306:, and the authors are all well-known academics.
941:has already weighed in, but could be mistaken.)
803:achievable without sacrificing overall quality.
1294:Understandable skepticism; it is a silly name.
356:and that biomedical information in any article
2176:"was widespread, it would often affect" -: -->
1023:No strong opinion. Dmy I suppose (thank you!)
1164:know. I'll look into it and get back to you.
354:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
8:
1077:eradication plan into ... <something: -->
43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
39:as one of the best articles produced by the
33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
2206:), "using the approved chemical temephos" (
1300:sell you access to the 2nd edition for $ 80
774:Why only humans, dogs and ferrets as hosts?
2255:of the success of the eradication effort.
2072:
961:related to his research, but according to
429:
292:
203:
52:
15:
363:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Medicine
564:review articles from the past five years
255:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Microbiology
164:
2522:Unknown-importance dermatology articles
2236:I think the map would probably be best.
2103:
2075:
431:
294:
205:
2467:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
1183:
874:
481:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sanitation
2497:High-importance Microbiology articles
2243:Given that there is a "main" article
2023:Parasitic Diseases (textbook, pg 289)
1182:This could use better clarification:
7:
2177:"was widespread, it often affected"
2064:The following discussion is closed.
592:Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
461:This article is within the scope of
372:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine
346:This article is within the scope of
235:This article is within the scope of
1107:national eradication programs : -->
194:It is of interest to the following
2542:Low-importance sanitation articles
2008:Velschius and the Rod of Asclepius
1941:this week. Looking forward to it.
1108:The Carter Center and WHO. Or the
14:
2512:High-importance medicine articles
2502:WikiProject Microbiology articles
2452:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles
589:Other potential sources include:
258:Template:WikiProject Microbiology
2391:The discussion above is closed.
1900:Caduceus as a symbol of medicine
612:
526:
454:
433:
358:use high-quality medical sources
333:
323:
296:
228:
207:
174:
165:
19:
2547:WikiProject Sanitation articles
2527:Dermatology task force articles
2477:FA-Class level-5 vital articles
1227:Is this link useful anywhere ?
501:This article has been rated as
484:Template:WikiProject Sanitation
392:This article has been rated as
275:This article has been rated as
2532:All WikiProject Medicine pages
2492:FA-Class Microbiology articles
1619:Reworded to de-emphasize this.
969:interpretation) is warranted.
764:23:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
748:19:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
737:It is a borderline vandalism.
733:19:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
718:03:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
2517:FA-Class dermatology articles
2245:Eradication of dracunculiasis
1990:Yes that's fine. No rush. --
1733:09:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
1721:16:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
1702:16:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
1678:Clinical Microbiology Reviews
1572:Clarify Carter Center's role.
1222:15:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
550:sources of information about
475:and see a list of open tasks.
414:This article is supported by
375:Template:WikiProject Medicine
249:and see a list of open tasks.
2537:FA-Class sanitation articles
2309:Spot-checks worked out fine.
2035:21:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
1998:08:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
1986:00:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
1970:03:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
1951:23:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
1921:19:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
1392:02:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
1335:05:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
1316:02:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
1174:02:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
979:20:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
956:15:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
929:15:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
910:11:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
892:19:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
869:18:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
854:14:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
2563:
2507:FA-Class medicine articles
2437:11:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
2428:human disease eradicated.
2418:03:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
2384:01:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
2366:12:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
2057:07:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
1936:20:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
1850:20:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
1831:20:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
1795:20:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
1597:04:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
1518:10:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
1498:04:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
1483:18:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1463:18:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1364:18:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1288:18:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1264:18:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1245:18:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1202:18:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1159:21:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1138:20:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1122:04:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
1093:18:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1071:04:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
1055:18:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
1033:04:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
1017:18:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
832:00:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
813:14:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
692:20:15, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
673:20:15, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
507:project's importance scale
417:the Dermatology task force
398:project's importance scale
281:project's importance scale
138:Featured article candidate
2344:19:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
2328:16:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
2196:Organophosphate poisoning
2166:16:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
753:Knowledge (XXG):Vandalism
500:
449:
413:
391:
318:
274:
223:
202:
147:
55:
51:
41:Knowledge (XXG) community
2393:Please do not modify it.
2066:Please do not modify it.
933:Oopsie, that is, except
789:21:07, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
238:WikiProject Microbiology
2462:FA-Class vital articles
2141:Talk:Dracunculiasis/GA2
873:I'd contemplate taking
1759:unique to this disease
1751:Dracunculus medinensis
1743:Dracunculus medinensis
1657:Dracunculus medinensis
1641:Dracunculus medinensis
1583:Infections in baboons?
464:WikiProject Sanitation
410:
1629:Took a crack at this.
1128:relative difference.
409:
261:Microbiology articles
188:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
181:level-5 vital article
81:Articles for deletion
2432:UndercoverClassicist
1885:Fiery flying serpent
1869:May through August).
570:free review articles
546:. Here are links to
349:WikiProject Medicine
119:Good article nominee
100:Good article nominee
1602:Comments from Colin
1110:Hopkins, et al. ref
658:Update and clean-up
487:sanitation articles
2067:
1775:What do you think?
1709:Parasitic Diseases
1690:Parasitic Diseases
1669:Parasitic Diseases
1561:Historical range?
1371:review at the time
1304:a relevant journal
1296:Parasitic Diseases
1040:busy days ahead.)
542:and are typically
411:
190:content assessment
56:Article milestones
2131:
2130:
2065:
1682:resource exchange
1553:Surgical removal?
1535:IPA pronunciation
655:
654:
636:
635:
606:
605:
521:
520:
517:
516:
513:
512:
428:
427:
424:
423:
378:medicine articles
291:
290:
287:
286:
159:
158:
155:
154:
2554:
2185:"moniker" -: -->
2085:Copyvio detector
2073:
1962:
1892:Rod of Asclepius
1524:More to-do items
1510:
1475:
1455:
1442:
1356:
1347:this looks wonky
1327:
1280:
1256:
1237:
1194:
1151:
1085:
1047:
1009:
948:
921:
884:
745:
730:
703:
650:
627:
626:
616:
608:
530:
523:
489:
488:
485:
482:
479:
458:
451:
450:
445:
437:
430:
380:
379:
376:
373:
370:
343:
338:
337:
336:
327:
320:
319:
314:
311:
300:
293:
263:
262:
259:
256:
253:
232:
225:
224:
219:
211:
204:
187:
178:
177:
170:
169:
161:
150:Featured article
148:Current status:
133:
114:
95:
76:
53:
31:featured article
23:
16:
2562:
2561:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2442:
2441:
2402:
2397:
2396:
2316:
2306:
2296:
2173:
2135:This review is
2127:
2099:
2070:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2042:
2010:
1960:
1821:Have reworded.
1604:
1532:, replace Merck
1526:
1508:
1473:
1453:
1440:
1354:
1325:
1278:
1254:
1235:
1192:
1149:
1083:
1045:
1007:
999:
946:
919:
882:
796:
776:
743:
728:
697:
660:
651:
645:
621:
548:possibly useful
544:review articles
486:
483:
480:
477:
476:
443:
394:High-importance
377:
374:
371:
368:
367:
341:Medicine portal
339:
334:
332:
313:Highâimportance
312:
306:
277:High-importance
260:
257:
254:
251:
250:
218:Highâimportance
217:
185:
175:
129:
110:
91:
72:
12:
11:
5:
2560:
2558:
2550:
2549:
2544:
2539:
2534:
2529:
2524:
2519:
2514:
2509:
2504:
2499:
2494:
2489:
2484:
2479:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2459:
2454:
2444:
2443:
2440:
2439:
2401:
2398:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2347:
2346:
2315:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2305:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2295:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2172:
2169:
2146:
2145:
2129:
2128:
2126:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2109:
2106:
2105:
2101:
2100:
2098:
2097:
2095:External links
2092:
2087:
2081:
2078:
2077:
2071:
2062:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2041:
2038:
2009:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1938:
1909:
1908:
1888:
1880:ketogenic diet
1876:
1870:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1816:
1811:
1808:
1803:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1763:
1754:
1747:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1704:
1653:
1650:
1637:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1610:
1603:
1600:
1585:
1584:
1581:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1570:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1558:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1486:
1485:
1433:
1432:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1402:
1395:
1394:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1320:Got it, good.
1225:
1224:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1125:
1124:
1074:
1073:
1036:
1035:
998:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
966:
963:this biography
898:
871:
837:
795:
792:
775:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
735:
694:
659:
656:
653:
652:
647:
643:
641:
638:
637:
634:
633:
623:
622:
617:
611:
604:
603:
602:
601:
587:
574:
555:
552:Dracunculiasis
531:
519:
518:
515:
514:
511:
510:
503:Low-importance
499:
493:
492:
490:
473:the discussion
459:
447:
446:
444:Lowâimportance
438:
426:
425:
422:
421:
412:
402:
401:
390:
384:
383:
381:
345:
344:
328:
316:
315:
301:
289:
288:
285:
284:
273:
267:
266:
264:
247:the discussion
233:
221:
220:
212:
200:
199:
193:
171:
157:
156:
153:
152:
145:
144:
141:
134:
126:
125:
122:
115:
112:March 20, 2024
107:
106:
103:
96:
88:
87:
84:
77:
74:August 9, 2005
69:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
48:
27:Dracunculiasis
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2559:
2548:
2545:
2543:
2540:
2538:
2535:
2533:
2530:
2528:
2525:
2523:
2520:
2518:
2515:
2513:
2510:
2508:
2505:
2503:
2500:
2498:
2495:
2493:
2490:
2488:
2485:
2483:
2480:
2478:
2475:
2473:
2470:
2468:
2465:
2463:
2460:
2458:
2455:
2453:
2450:
2449:
2447:
2438:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2427:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2410:47.139.46.124
2405:
2399:
2394:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2351:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2320:Chiswick Chap
2313:
2308:
2307:
2303:
2298:
2297:
2293:
2286:
2285:
2282:
2277:
2276:
2274:
2269:
2268:
2266:
2265:
2257:
2256:
2254:
2249:
2248:
2246:
2242:
2235:
2234:
2231:
2230:
2227:
2222:
2221:
2219:
2212:
2211:
2209:
2205:
2200:
2199:
2197:
2193:
2188:
2187:
2184:
2179:
2178:
2175:
2174:
2170:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2160:
2157:
2153:
2152:Chiswick Chap
2150:
2144:
2142:
2138:
2133:
2132:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2111:
2110:
2108:
2107:
2102:
2096:
2093:
2091:
2088:
2086:
2083:
2082:
2080:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2049:Chiswick Chap
2039:
2037:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2019:
2015:
2007:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1939:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1919:
1916:
1911:
1910:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1886:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1871:
1867:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1838:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1819:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1779:
1773:
1772:D. medinensis
1769:
1768:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1760:
1755:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1734:
1731:
1728:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1705:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1686:D. medinensis
1683:
1679:
1675:
1674:a 2002 review
1670:
1666:
1665:D. medinensis
1662:
1661:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1599:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1574:
1571:
1568:
1563:
1562:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1431:
1429:
1424:
1419:
1416:
1413:
1411:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1380:
1379:author claims
1376:
1372:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1348:
1344:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1272:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1185:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1105:
1104:this CDC page
1101:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
996:
980:
976:
972:
971:Draken Bowser
967:
964:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
940:
939:Graham Beards
937:. (I believe
936:
932:
931:
930:
926:
922:
918:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
902:Draken Bowser
899:
895:
894:
893:
889:
885:
881:
876:
872:
870:
866:
862:
857:
856:
855:
851:
847:
846:Draken Bowser
843:
838:
835:
834:
833:
829:
825:
821:
820:Draken Bowser
817:
816:
815:
814:
810:
806:
805:Draken Bowser
801:
793:
791:
790:
786:
782:
773:
765:
761:
757:
754:
751:
750:
749:
746:
740:
736:
734:
731:
725:
721:
720:
719:
715:
711:
707:
701:
695:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
657:
640:
639:
632:
629:
628:
625:
624:
620:
615:
610:
609:
600:
599:
594:
593:
588:
585:
584:
579:
578:TRIP database
575:
572:
571:
566:
565:
560:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
540:
535:
534:Ideal sources
532:
529:
525:
524:
508:
504:
498:
495:
494:
491:
474:
470:
466:
465:
460:
457:
453:
452:
448:
442:
439:
436:
432:
419:
418:
408:
404:
403:
399:
395:
389:
386:
385:
382:
365:
364:
359:
355:
351:
350:
342:
331:
329:
326:
322:
321:
317:
310:
305:
302:
299:
295:
282:
278:
272:
269:
268:
265:
248:
244:
240:
239:
234:
231:
227:
226:
222:
216:
213:
210:
206:
201:
197:
191:
183:
182:
172:
168:
163:
162:
151:
146:
142:
140:
139:
135:
132:
128:
127:
123:
121:
120:
116:
113:
109:
108:
104:
102:
101:
97:
94:
93:June 10, 2010
90:
89:
85:
83:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
63:
60:
59:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2431:
2429:
2425:
2406:
2403:
2392:
2348:
2317:
2252:
2158:
2148:
2147:
2134:
2123:Instructions
2063:
2018:edit summary
2011:
1957:
1872:
1860:
1813:
1805:
1780:
1771:
1765:
1756:
1708:
1689:
1685:
1677:
1668:
1664:
1645:
1634:
1624:
1613:
1607:
1586:
1548:
1543:
1530:Remove Slate
1529:
1505:
1487:
1470:
1450:
1437:
1434:
1426:Baboons ???
1425:
1409:
1351:
1341:
1322:
1295:
1275:
1271:these people
1268:
1267:
1251:
1248:
1232:
1226:
1189:
1181:
1180:
1146:
1126:
1080:
1075:
1042:
1038:
1037:
1004:
1001:
1000:
943:
916:
879:
797:
777:
706:MOS:LEADCITE
661:
618:
596:
590:
581:
568:
562:
551:
547:
537:
533:
502:
462:
415:
393:
361:
347:
276:
252:Microbiology
243:Microbiology
236:
215:Microbiology
196:WikiProjects
179:
149:
136:
131:May 22, 2024
117:
98:
79:
45:please do so
34:
26:
2137:transcluded
2014:Herostratus
997:SG comments
309:Dermatology
2446:Categories
2090:Authorship
2076:GA toolbox
1343:WP:ELNEVER
842:Cox (2002)
781:SmilingBoy
567:(limit to
478:Sanitation
469:Sanitation
441:Sanitation
105:Not listed
36:identified
2149:Reviewer:
2113:Templates
2104:Reviewing
2040:GA Review
1896:Nehushtan
1273:(MEDRS)?
631:Archive 1
580:provides
561:provides
184:is rated
2400:âSecondâ
2376:Ajpolino
2358:Ajpolino
2350:Ajpolino
2336:Ajpolino
2287:Removed.
2171:Comments
2162:contribs
2118:Criteria
2047:Passed.
2027:Ajpolino
1978:Ajpolino
1943:Ajpolino
1928:Ajpolino
1902:and our
1842:Ajpolino
1823:Ajpolino
1787:Ajpolino
1713:Ajpolino
1694:Ajpolino
1589:Ajpolino
1490:Ajpolino
1430:Baboons
1384:Ajpolino
1308:Ajpolino
1269:Who are
1214:Ajpolino
1210:CDC says
1166:Ajpolino
1114:Ajpolino
1063:Ajpolino
1025:Ajpolino
861:Ajpolino
824:Ajpolino
794:Comments
756:Ajpolino
710:Ajpolino
684:Ajpolino
665:Ajpolino
619:Archives
369:Medicine
304:Medicine
186:FA-class
143:Promoted
2314:Summary
2304:Sources
2253:because
1961:Georgia
1509:Georgia
1474:Georgia
1454:Georgia
1441:Georgia
1355:Georgia
1326:Georgia
1279:Georgia
1255:Georgia
1236:Georgia
1193:Georgia
1150:Georgia
1084:Georgia
1046:Georgia
1008:Georgia
947:Georgia
920:Georgia
883:Georgia
700:Ruslik0
505:on the
396:on the
279:on the
64:Process
2372:WT:MED
2294:Images
1904:source
1898:, and
1894:, and
1711:text.
739:Ruslik
724:Ruslik
559:PubMed
192:scale.
124:Listed
67:Result
2278:Done.
2189:Done.
2180:Done.
2139:from
1992:Colin
1958:Sandy
1915:Colin
1861:maybe
1727:Colin
1506:Sandy
1471:Sandy
1451:Sandy
1438:Sandy
1352:Sandy
1323:Sandy
1276:Sandy
1252:Sandy
1233:Sandy
1190:Sandy
1147:Sandy
1130:Spicy
1100:Fig 1
1081:Sandy
1043:Sandy
1005:Sandy
944:Sandy
935:Colin
917:Sandy
880:Sandy
173:This
29:is a
2426:next
2414:talk
2380:talk
2362:talk
2340:talk
2324:talk
2156:talk
2053:talk
2031:talk
1982:talk
1966:Talk
1947:talk
1932:talk
1846:talk
1827:talk
1791:talk
1717:talk
1698:talk
1646:some
1593:talk
1514:Talk
1494:talk
1479:Talk
1459:Talk
1446:Talk
1388:talk
1360:Talk
1331:Talk
1312:talk
1284:Talk
1260:Talk
1241:Talk
1229:WASH
1218:talk
1198:Talk
1170:talk
1155:Talk
1134:talk
1118:talk
1089:Talk
1067:talk
1051:Talk
1029:talk
1013:Talk
975:talk
952:Talk
925:Talk
906:talk
888:Talk
865:talk
850:talk
828:talk
809:talk
785:talk
760:talk
744:Zero
729:Zero
714:talk
688:talk
680:here
669:talk
595:and
576:The
388:High
271:High
86:Kept
61:Date
2210:).
2208:CDC
2204:WHO
2012:Hi
1968:)
1676:in
1516:)
1481:)
1461:)
1362:)
1333:)
1286:)
1262:)
1243:)
1200:)
1157:)
1091:)
1053:)
1015:)
954:)
927:)
890:)
818:Hi
800:MOS
696:Hi
598:CDC
497:Low
2448::
2416:)
2382:)
2374:.
2364:)
2352:?
2342:)
2326:)
2164:)
2055:)
2033:)
1984:)
1949:)
1934:)
1848:)
1829:)
1793:)
1719:)
1700:)
1595:)
1496:)
1390:)
1345:,
1314:)
1220:)
1172:)
1136:)
1120:)
1069:)
1031:)
977:)
908:)
867:)
852:)
844:.
830:)
811:)
787:)
762:)
716:)
690:)
671:)
307::
2412:(
2378:(
2360:(
2338:(
2322:(
2159:·
2154:(
2051:(
2029:(
1994:°
1980:(
1964:(
1945:(
1930:(
1917:°
1844:(
1825:(
1789:(
1729:°
1715:(
1696:(
1612:"
1591:(
1512:(
1492:(
1477:(
1457:(
1444:(
1386:(
1358:(
1329:(
1310:(
1282:(
1258:(
1239:(
1216:(
1196:(
1168:(
1153:(
1132:(
1116:(
1087:(
1065:(
1049:(
1027:(
1011:(
973:(
950:(
923:(
904:(
886:(
863:(
848:(
826:(
807:(
783:(
758:(
741:_
726:_
712:(
702::
698:@
686:(
667:(
586:.
573:)
554:.
509:.
420:.
400:.
366:.
283:.
198::
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.